DOCSLIB.ORG

Waikato District Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waikato District Council WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel REPORT 2 Ohinewai Rezoning 24 May 2021 Commissioners Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) Mr Dynes Fulton Mr Weo Maag Page | 1 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel Page | 2 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The APL submission ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Statutory and planning framework ............................................................................................ 15 4 Site suitability and physical characteristics ............................................................................... 18 5 Three Waters Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Natural hazards ........................................................................................................................... 24 7 Transport and traffic ................................................................................................................... 26 8 Economic effects .......................................................................................................................... 35 9 Cultural effects ............................................................................................................................. 37 10 Social Impacts .............................................................................................................................. 39 11 Residential component ................................................................................................................ 43 12 Acoustic effects ............................................................................................................................ 47 13 Ecological effects .......................................................................................................................... 49 14 Coal mining .................................................................................................................................. 52 15 Urban Design ............................................................................................................................... 53 16 Landscape and visual effects ....................................................................................................... 55 17 Other infrastructure .................................................................................................................... 56 18 Cumulative and precedent effects .............................................................................................. 57 19 Is there an obligation to consider alternative sites? .................................................................. 58 20 District Plan Provisions ............................................................................................................... 60 21 Statutory tests ............................................................................................................................. 70 22 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 95 23 Decision ........................................................................................................................................ 96 APPENDIX 1 – PARTICIPANTS IN THE HEARING ...................................................................... 97 APPENDIX 2 – DECISION ON SUBMISSIONS AND FURTHER SUBMISSIONS ...................... 99 APPENDIX 3 – DISTRICT PLAN MAP ........................................................................................... 103 APPENDIX 4 – DISTRICT PLAN PROVISIONS FOR OHINEWAI ............................................. 104 APPENDIX 5 - SECTION 32AA EVALUATION ........................................................................... 105 Page | 3 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel GLOSSARY OF TERMS APL Ambury Properties Limited Council Waikato District Council Huntly WWTP Huntly wastewater treatment plant NPS-UD National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 OLL Ohinewai Lands Limited Panel The Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel PDP Proposed Waikato District Plan TCG New Zealand Comfort Group Ltd RL Reduced Level RMA Resource Management Act RPS Waikato Regional Policy Statement Waka Kotahi Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency WRC Waikato Regional Council Page | 4 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel PART 1 - INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1. Stage 1 of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP) was notified on 18 July 2018. This encompassed the review of all provisions of the Operative Waikato District Plan, except natural hazards and climate change matters, which form part of Stage 2 of the review. Stage 2 of the PDP was notified on 27 July 2020 and the hearing of submissions is imminent. 2. In accordance with section 34A(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), the Waikato District Council (Council) appointed a seven-member Independent Commissioners Hearings Panel (the Panel) to hear and make decisions on the submissions on the PDP. While seven commissioners were appointed to hear and decide the PDP, a subset of four commissioners were tasked to hear and decide the submissions seeking rezoning of Ohinewai: a. Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) b. Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) c. Mr Dynes Fulton d. Mr Weo Maag 3. This Decision addresses submissions seeking the rezoning of land at Ohinewai. Ohinewai is located on the eastern banks of the Waikato River, 9km north of Huntly and has a population of approximately 245. The existing development at Ohinewai comprises largely rural land uses and is dissected by the Waikato Expressway and the North Island Main Trunk railway line which run parallel. There is significant dairy and dry stock farming on the eastern side of the Waikato Expressway, as well as smaller lifestyle rural uses with nine dwellings (zoned Village Zone in the PDP) located on the eastern side of Lumsden Road, ranging from 1550m2 to 5ha in size. Lake Rotokawau Reserve is located on the eastern side also. The more residential part of Ohinewai Village is located on the western side of the Waikato Expressway. It includes the Ohinewai Community Hall, Ohinewai Primary School, former commercial buildings which are now disused, an industrial yard, residential properties on sections in the order of 1000m2 and a range of rural activities including greenhouses and an orchard. In the wider Ohinewai area there are large industrial uses including a sawmill, transportable house construction and house relocation companies. 1.2 Primary Submissions 4. At the close of submissions on 9 October 2018, Council received over 300 submissions seeking some form of rezoning in the district. Seven submissions addressing the zoning at Ohinewai were received from the following submitters: a. Ambury Properties Limited [764]; b. Planning Focus Limited [383]; c. Shand Properties Limited [738]; Page | 5 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel d. Ohinewai Land Limited [428]; e. Ohinewai Area Committee [793]; f. PLB Construction [804]; and g. Ribbonwood Family Trust [863]. 5. Planning Focus Limited [383.1] withdrew its submission on 16 March 2020, and consequently we have not considered that submission, nor any associated further submissions. 6. The submissions seeking a change of zoning in and around Ohinewai could result in a significant change of land use from the current predominantly rural uses. The most detailed proposal was from Ambury Properties Limited (APL), for 178ha of land bounded by Lumsden Road, Tahuna Road and Balemi Road. This is referred to throughout this decision as ‘the APL Proposal’ and includes the introduction of urban zones, an Ohinewai Structure Plan and customised plan provisions applying to Ohinewai. Although the proposal evolved considerably between the time that the submission was lodged on 9 October 2018 until the closing statement from APL’s legal counsel was lodged with the Council on 23 September 2020, the proposal fundamentally comprises of a mix of urban zones and uses: a. 68ha of industrial zoned land, including 37ha for the TCG Sleepyhead factory; b. 13ha of business / commercial zoned land for a service station, discount factory outlet shops, community facilities and a small amount of convenience retail; c. 52ha of residential land for up to 1100 homes; and d. 55ha of public open space including stormwater management areas, recreational facilities, ecological enhancement areas and other community areas.1 7. Directly south of the APL Proposal and also on rural land, Ohinewai Lands Limited (OLL) sought that a further growth area (39ha) be signalled within the Ohinewai Structure Plan proposed by APL (‘the OLL Proposal’). No ‘live’ zoning was sought at this stage, with the intent being to allow for future low density residential use and open space by way of a future plan change. 8. Shand Properties and Ribbonwood Family
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strong Iwi Involvement in River Clean-Up Projects
    DECEMBER 2018 A newsletter from the Strong iwi involvement in MESSAGE FROM river clean-up projects THE CE It has been a busy end of year for THE WAIKATO RIVER AUTHORITY HAS ANNOUNCED $6 MILLION FOR RIVER the WRA. We completed our 8th CLEAN-UP PROJECTS IN ITS JUST COMPLETED FUNDING ROUND, WITH MORE funding round and it was great to THAN A THIRD OF THESE PROJECTS BEING IWI LED. see projects successfully lifted from the Restoration Strategy Overall, a total of 38 projects have been The largest project to be funded this year that Environment Minister funded in 2018. is a continuation of the Waipā Catchment Parker launched earlier this year. Authority Co-chairs Hon John Luxton and Plan implementation which will involve Our advocacy for the Vision & Roger Pikia, say a feature of the funding working with approximately 70 farmers Strategy has been pursued across round has been a close alignment with the and landowners within identified priority a number of fora. We held our Restoration Strategy for the Waikato and catchments. The $1.6 million of funding AGM on the back of publishing Waipā rivers and the strong participation will work towards reducing sediment our 2017/18 Annual Report. We of River Iwi. levels going into the Waipā River and its have also received positive media tributaries. Sediment from the Waipā “In recent years there has been a clear coverage across several articles River is a major factor in reducing the trend for successful projects to reflect in as many weeks. One of these water quality in the lower Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report
    The Adare Limited Company Limited Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report 17 May 2018 Prepared by Awa Environmental Limited for The Adare Company Limited The Adare Limited Company Limited Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report Project No. J000098 Document title Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report Document number 03 Version number 03 Date 17 May 2018 Project manager Craig Martell Author TonyTrueman Awa Environmental Limited 115 Tory Street, Te Aro, Wellington 6011, Phone:+64 04 455 0990 www.awa.kiwi Document History Version Date Description Author Reviewed 1 02/11/2017 Review TonyTrueman Craig Martell 2 29/03/2018 Preliminary Issue Tony Trueman Tony Trueman 3 17/05/2018 Review Tony Trueman Tony Trueman COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Awa Environmental Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of constitutes an infringement of copyright. iii The Adare Limited Company Limited Waikato River Adare Flood Hazard Report Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. iv 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 1% AEP River Flooding Assessment ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 1% AEP Flood Hazard Extent ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ages on Weathered Plio-Pleistocene Tephra Sequences, Western North Island, New Zealand
    riwtioll: Lowe. D. ~.; TiP.I>CU. J. M.: Kamp. P. J. J.; Liddell, I. J.; Briggs, R. M.: Horrocks, 1. L. 2001. Ages 011 weathered Pho-~Je.stocene tephra sequences, western North Island. New Zealand. Ill: Juviglle. E.T.: Raina!. J·P. (Eds). '"Tephras: Chronology, Archaeology', CDERAD editeur, GoudeL us Dossiers de f'ArcMo-Logis I: 45-60. Ages on weathered Plio-Pleistocene tephra sequences, western North Island, New Zealand Ages de sequences de tephras Plio-Pleistocenes alteres, fie du Nord-Ouest, Nouvelle lelande David J. Lowe·, J, Mark Tippett!, Peter J. J, Kamp·, Ivan J. LiddeD·, Roger M. Briggs· & Joanna L. Horrocks· Abstract: using the zircon fISsion-track method, we have obtainedfive ages 011 members oftwo strongly-...-eathered. silicic, Pliocene·Pleislocelle tephra seql/ences, Ihe KOIIIUQ and Hamilton Ashformalions, in weslern North !sland, New Zealand. These are Ihe jirst numerical ages 10 be oblained directly on these deposils. Ofthe Kauroa Ash sequence, member KI (basal unit) was dated at 2,24 ± 0.19 Ma, confirming a previous age ofc. 1.25 Ma obtained (via tephrochronology)from KlAr ages on associatedbasalt lava. Members K1 and X3 gave indistinguishable ages between 1,68.±0,/1 and 1.43 ± 0./7 Ma. Member K11, a correlQlilV! ojOparau Tephra andprobably also Ongatiti Ignimbrite. was dated at 1.18:i: 0.11 Ma, consistent with an age of 1.23 ± 0.02 Ma obtained by various methodr on Ongaiiti Ignimbrite. Palaeomagnetic measurements indicated that members XI3 to XIJ (top unit, Waiterimu Ash) are aged between c. 1.2 Ma and O. 78 Mo. Possible sources of/he Kauroa Ash Formation include younger \!Oleanic centres in the sOllthern Coromandel Volcanic Zone orolder volcanic cenlres in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • [Review] for Vote Transport
    Hon Bill English Minister of Finance 7.6 Executive Wing Parliament Buildings WELLINGTON Dear Bill VALUE FOR MONEY REVIEW – VOTE TRANSPORT Purpose This letter responds to your letter dated 17 December 2008 and the Cabinet Business Committee paper CBC (08) 563. In line with the letter and Cabinet paper, I have asked the Ministry to review Vote Transport to identify: • savings that could be freed up for Budget 2009; • programmes that are inconsistent with the government’s priorities and should be discontinued; • programmes that are inconsistent with the government’s priorities and should be looked into; • programmes and expenditure that are not effective or efficient; • areas where performance information is currently insufficient to judge effectiveness or efficiency and actions that are required to make improvements by the next review. Vote Transport summary A summary of the funding under Vote Transport is attached to this letter. It is separated between departmental and non-departmental funding. Departmental funding The Ministry of Transport’s departmental funding will decrease by $3.685 million over the next three years mainly due to the cessation of medium-term project funding. In addition to the planned decrease in funding, the Ministry has forecast unavoidable cost increases arising from existing commitments in relation to staff costs (salaries), building and other expenses. These are expected to add a further $3.377 million by 2011/2012, or 12 percent of the baseline funding of $28.4 million. My Chief Executive has made a commitment
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study in Waikato Soils for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway
    Yong, I. & Clayton, P.B. (2017) Application of Soil Specific Correction Factors for Liquefaction Assessment: Case Study in Waikato Soils for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. Proc. 20th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium. Eds. GJ Alexander & CY Chin, Napier Application of soil specific correction factors for liquefaction assessment: case study in Waikato soils for the Hamilton section of the Waikato expressway Irene Yong Geotechnical Engineer, Beca Auckland, NZ [email protected] Philip Clayton Technical Director, Beca Auckland, NZ. [email protected] (Corresponding author) Keywords: Fines Correction, Ic Cutoff, Liquefaction, Hamilton Ash, Waikato. ABSTRACT The four-lane, 21.8 kilometre long, Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway is the largest roading project undertaken in this region’s history and one of the larger projects currently being undertaken in New Zealand. Many of the seventeen expressway bridges in the Hamilton Section are underlain by Pleistocene soils assessed as having a high liquefaction potential. Typically the soils encountered are volcanic in origin either as primary tephra deposits or reworked volcanically derived material. A number of researchers have noted the potential for misclassification of such soils by the CPT, therefore it was decided to undertake co-located borehole/SCPT/SDMT and laboratory classification testing for use in conjunction with a site wide geologic model to develop soil specific correction factors for use in liquefaction assessment. Soil specific correction factors were investigated for the Ic sand like/clay like cut-off (B&I 2014) and the fines content (Cfc). The specific correction factors derived are presented along with examples from the project showing the consequence, some of which are significant, of adopting soil specific correlations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Some Effects of the Wairakei Geothermal Power Station Upon the Waikato River
    TANE 21, 1975 A STUDY OF SOME EFFECTS OF THE WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL POWER STATION UPON THE WAIKATO RIVER by G.J. Cox*, Sally M. Naylor f, and D.E. Thomson ft SUMMARY The effects of heated discharges from the Wairakei Geothermal Power Scheme upon the Waikato River have been investigated. Water temperature, oxygen content and mercury concentration were measured at a number of points above and below the station and aquatic life was studied (the data on the flora has yet to be fully analysed and can thus only be described briefly here). Marked local effects on both the aquatic life and paramaters of water quality were observed. However, although further investigation is warranted, particularly of the discharge rates of heavy metals such as mercury, the scheme does not appear to contribute significantly to the pollution of the Waikato River. INTRODUCTION A number of reports dealing with various aspects of the Wairakei Geothermal Power Station and its effects on the Waikato River have been published since the station became operative in the late 1950's. This work has recently been summarised by Axtmann1 who included a number of New Zealand Electricity Department reports in his references. However certain topics such as thermal mixing and the effects of the outputs from both station and bore fields on the aquatic life, have been virtually ignored. It was chiefly to provide some information on these that the present study was initiated. The study was confined to a single week in the mid-winter (11 to 16 August) of 1974. The power station-bore complex has two outlets into the Waikato River, the more obvious one being the discharge of cooling water used to condense the stream which is used to drive the powerhouse turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package
    Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package Chris Dawson - Planning 1.1 The correct approach under the RMA is to determine what district plan provisions (or zone) most appropriately assist Waikato District Council to carry out its functions to achieve the purpose of the Act. The critical evaluation is set out in s32 of the Act which determines determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed provisions in achieving the objectives of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP). 1.2 Mercer Airport requires a special zone to recognise that it is already a regionally significant aviation resource and should be formally protected in the District Plan as such. The rezoning, plus Obstacle Limitation Surfaces1 and Air Noise Boundary2 provisions are required to protect that facility and provide it with the operational certainty to grow over time in the future. 1.3 The most appropriate time to provide the statutory protection for the airport and the surrounding community is now before the Mercer area gets more developed than it already is. The implementation of a Special Zone for Mercer Airport is essential to ensure that the Proposed Waikato District Plan is consistent with the relevant higher order documents, specifically the Operative Waikato Regional Policy Statement Policy 6.3 and Method 6.3.1. 1.4 The policy direction of the Rural Zone is a relevant consideration under s32 of the Act, and Lens 2 of the s42A Framework report because that zone informs the existing environment and will continue to be applied over the
    [Show full text]
  • Meremere Roading Cases Tudy
    1 Reference: Harmsworth, G.R. 2005: Roading Case Study: Transit New Zealand and Ngati Naho, Meremere œ Springhill Road. Contract to Opus International Consultants New Zealand Ltd. 6 pp. FRST programme: Roading enhanced by M,ori values and Knowledge (OPSX0301) http://www.transportco2.org.nz/ FRST programme: Roading enhanced by Mori values and knowledge Case study: Transit New Zealand and Ngati Naho, Meremere œ Springhill Road Garth Harmsworth, Landcare Research [email protected] Background Construction on a 100-m section of the Waikato Expressway (major 4-lane highway), between Mercer and Longswamp, was temporarily stopped in 2002 while a solution was sought between the parties, Transit New Zealand (Transit) and the local hap> Ng,ti Naho, regarding a significant cultural "taniwha" (a M,ori mythological creature) and wetland site. The issue was widely publicised nationally and internationally in 2002 when it came to the attention of the media. The small wetland and culturally significant site (~30 m by 20 m) was located between the existing road and the Waikato River, adjacent to the planned Expressway. Transit NZ had also identified the vicinity as having —higher environmental value than adjacent land“ (Transit New Zealand 2002b) and there was a spring feeding a small remnant of kahikatea trees ( Podocarpus dacrydiodes ) œ a fact never presented by the media. —While a lot of the area we are working on is in swamp, this section over about 30 metres appears to be a spring which may be significant for a large stand of kahikatea trees, which need to be protected“ (Transit New Zealand 2002b), —The discussions to date with Ngati Naho had focussed on how the Expressway could be constructed past this section in a manner which preserved the nature of the site“ (Transit New Zealand 2002b).
    [Show full text]
  • Hortnz Submission On
    COMMENTS ON PROPOSED WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN CHANGE 1 WAIKATO AND WAIPA RIVER CATCHMENTS TO: Waikato Regional Council COMMENTS ON: Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 Waikato and Waipa River Catchments NAME: Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) ADDRESS: PO Box 10 232 WELLINGTON 1. HortNZ’s submission, and the decisions sought, are detailed in the attached schedules: 1.1. HortNZ wishes to be heard in support of this submission. 1.2. This submission is supported by a technical report that is to be read in support of this submission. The report has been lodged with the Waikato Regional Council via FTP file Transfer and is titled “Values and Current Allocation of Responsibility For Discharges” Jacobs Technical Report in Support of the Horticulture NZ Submission on Healthy River Plan Change”. 1.3. The Plan and this submission cover a wide range of issues and there are potential consequential amendments that will be required to give effect to the relief sought in this submission. Decision sought: 1.4. Other changes or consequential amendments as are necessary to give effect to the matters raised in this submission. 2. Background to HortNZ and its RMA involvement: 2.1. Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) was established on 1 December 2005, combining the New Zealand Vegetable and Potato Growers’ and New Zealand Fruitgrowers’ and New Zealand Berryfruit Growers’ Federations. 2.2. On behalf of its 5,500 active grower members HortNZ takes a detailed involvement in resource management planning processes as part of its National Environmental Policies. HortNZ works to raise growers’ awareness of the RMA to ensure effective grower involvement under the Act, whether in the planning process or through resource consent applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Swears for Waka Kotahi – Transportation Engineering
    Before Independent Hearing Commissioners In Ngāruawāhia Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) In the matter of of a submission by Ambury Properties Limited in respect of the proposed Waikato District Plan pursuant to Clause 6 of Schedule 1 of the Act seeking the rezoning of land at Ohinewai and Ambury Properties Limited (Submitter) and NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) (Submitter and Further Submitter) Statement of evidence of Robert Swears for Waka Kotahi – Transportation Engineering 13 August 2020 1 1 Qualifications and experience 1.1 My full name is Robert Clive Swears. I am employed as a Principal Road Safety / Transport Engineer in the Hamilton Office of WSP; I have been in this role for approximately five and a half years. 1.2 My qualifications include a New Zealand Certificate in Engineering, a Bachelor of Engineering degree with Honours from the University of Canterbury, and a Master of Engineering Science degree (Transport) from the University of New South Wales. I am a Chartered Member of Engineering New Zealand (CMEngNZ), and a Member of the Engineering New Zealand (EngNZ) Transportation Group. 1.3 I have been carrying out professional engineering tasks related to the investigation, design, and construction of roading and highway projects for 30 years. I have worked on a variety of transportation projects throughout my career for various clients including Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) and local authorities. 1.4 Examples of land use development projects for which I have recently provided advice to Waka Kotahi include: a Oceana Gold New Zealand Limited: proposed extension to Martha Mine at Waihi; b Ward Demolition: proposed clean fill site in Waikato District; c Coombes Sand Quarry: proposed expansion of sand quarry; d Proposed service centre at interchange with the Huntly section of the Waikato Expressway; and e Te Awa Lakes: proposed accommodation, housing, and recreation facilities in Waikato District.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Reo O Te Repo – the Voice of the Wetland Introduction 1
    TE REO O TE REPO THE VOICE OF THE WETLAND CONNECTIONS, UNDERSTANDINGS AND LEARNINGS FOR THE RESTORATION EDITED BY YVONNE TAURA CHERI VAN SCHRAVENDIJK-GOODMAN OF OUR WETLANDS AND BEVERLEY CLARKSON Te reo o te repo = The voice of the wetland: connections, understandings and learnings for the restoration of our wetlands / edited by Yvonne Taura, Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman, Beverley Clarkson. -- Hamilton, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research and Waikato Raupatu River Trust, 2017. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-478-34799-9 (electronic) ISBN 978-0-947525-03-3 (print) I. Taura, Y., ed. II. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. III. Waikato Raupatu River Trust. Published by Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Private Bag 3127, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand Waikato Raupatu River Trust PO Box 481, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand This handbook was funded mainly by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (contract C09X1002).The handbook is a collaborative project between the Waikato Raupatu River Trust and Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. Editors: Yvonne Taura (Ngāti Hauā, Ngāti Tūwharetoa, Ngai Te Rangi, Ngāti Rangi, Ngāti Uenuku/Waikato Raupatu River Trust and Manaaki Whenua), Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (Te Atihaunui a Papārangi, Ngāti Apa, Ngāti Rangi), and Beverley Clarkson (Manaaki Whenua). Peer reviewers: Anne Austin (Manaaki Whenua), Kiriwai Mangan (Waikato Raupatu Lands Trust), and Monica Peters (people+science). Design and layout: Abby Davidson (NZ Landcare Trust) This work is copyright. The copying, adaptation, or issuing of this work to the public on a non-profit basis is welcomed. No other use of this work is permitted without the prior consent of the copyright holder(s).
    [Show full text]