Competing Interpretations of the Socio-Political Crisis in Ukraine in 2013-20161

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Competing Interpretations of the Socio-Political Crisis in Ukraine in 2013-20161 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v8i3.14505 ARTIGO Competing interpretations of the socio-political crisis in Ukraine in 2013-20161 Interpretações em disputa sobre a crise sociopolítica na Ucrânia em 2013-2016 Valentin YAKUSHIK2 Abstract: This article addresses the sharp ideological conflicts which underlie attempts to characterise and explain the on-going socio-political crisis in Ukraine, which started in 2013. It argues that both academic and non-academic commentators have presented diametrically opposed interpretations of the nature of the events of Autumn 2013 – Spring 2014, as well as of the relevant interpretations of the continuing socio-political crisis facing the country. Characterisations of these events vary from a revolution of dignity, denunciations of foreign intervention and separatist movements to assertions of a coup d’état which promoted and provoked regionalist movements and civil war. A second objective of the article is therefore to demonstrate the limitations of one- dimensional, strikingly ideologised interpretations of these events and the need for scholars engaged in the social sciences to generate unbiased, multi-dimensional, multi-level visions of complex, contradictory, tectonic transformations in contemporary Ukraine. Keywords: Ukraine - Revolution. Interpretation. Resumo: Este artigo aborda os agudos conflitos ideológicos que subjazem às tentativas de caracterizar e expli- car a crise sociopolítica em curso na Ucrânia, que abriu em 2013. Argumenta-se que os comentaristas acadêmi- cos e não acadêmicos apresentaram interpretações diametralmente opostas da natureza dos eventos do outono de 2013 – primavera de 2014, bem como as interpretações relevantes da contínua crise sócio-política que o país enfrenta. As caracterizações desses eventos variam de uma revolução da dignidade, denúncias de intervenção estrangeira e movimentos separatistas a asserções de um golpe de estado que promoveu e provocou movimen- tos regionalistas e guerra civil. Assim, um segundo objetivo do artigo é demonstrar as limitações das interpre- tações unidimensionais, notavelmente ideologizadas desses eventos e a necessidade dos estudiosos engajados nas ciências sociais gerarem visões imparciais, multidimensionais e multi-nível das transformações tectônicas complexas, contraditórias na Ucrânia contemporânea. Palavras-Chave: Ucrânia - Revolução. Interpretação. Submetido em: 3/11/2016. Aceito em: 21/11/2016. Introduction The development of multi-aspect, multi-level understanding of the complex, contradictory, and tectonic transformations of modern Ukraine is important and topical for political sci- ence if efficient practical political programmes are to be developed which properly address the current crisis. Multidimensionality is proposed here as providing just such an approach to the analysis of the recent political events. Under this approach a strident fixation on any one level of analysis, and/or on any limited methodology is rejected. It is hoped that when considering the full range of issues of political changes that began in Ukraine in the autumn 1 English revision: Rory O'Hara, formerly Senior Lecturer in Politics and Management at the University of East London. 2 Professor of Department of Political Science of the University of “Kiev-Mohyla Academy” (Kiev, Ukraine). 2 Skovorody vul., Kyiv 04655, Ukraine. Ph.D. in Political Science, PhD. in Law. E-mail: <yakus- [email protected]>. [Professor de Ciência Política, Universidade de “Kievo-Mogilianska Academia” (Kiev, Ucrânia)]. 105 Argum. (Vitória), v. 8, n. 3, p. 105-121, set./dez. 2016. Valentin YAKUSHIK of 2013 and which have continued, in one form or another, until the present day, it is possi- ble to overcome the narrow ideological isolation and biases which are prevalent in most of mass media covering the events in Ukraine. In this way, a much-needed departure from such subjectivist approaches, often highly sensationalist and usually borrowed from the me- dia environment, will ultimately help Ukraine-related political studies reach the level in which an authentic academic would be possible, rather than a journalistic approach to the relevant key issues. Several competing interpretations of the nature and content of the emerging and ongoing transformations in Ukraine have been proposed. These offer significantly different analyses from each other and vary profoundly in their depth, ideological orientation and in the policy prescriptions they propose. Such analyses relate to: (a) the daily life of millions of Ukrainian citizens and citizens of those countries where a large (or a certain) part of the population perceive the problems of Ukraine as their own, often assessed as being of a vital importance; (b) politicians (both Ukrainian and international / foreign) and the politicised section of the expert community (political scientists, economists, journalists and other professional interpreters, including those who position themselves as social scientists); (c) academic research, for which the academic truth is of a higher importance than the short-term party truths and corporate truths. Almost without exception these analyses have focused on either short-term or narrow (bi- ased) aspects of the problem under consideration, so that when beginning from such posi- tion it is scarcely possible to comprehend the complexity of the Ukrainian socio-political crisis. Accordingly, the present research attempts to present this complexity in its proper light, so that future researchers of the subject may benefit from the inferences to be drawn from this paper’s findings. Much of the recent analysis of Ukraine’s current crisis is ahistorical, failing even to acknowledge the nation’s precarious socio-economic dynamics over the course of the last 25 years, a period which encompasses Ukraine’s transition to independent statehood following the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991. During this period, Ukraine has become noto- rious for its poor economic performance and the nation’s rankings as defined by most prom- inent global socio-economic indices. Per the World Bank’s Doing Business index, Ukraine’s ranks 80th (among 137 economies examined) in 2017 on regulatory measures that enhance or restrain business activity (WORLD BANK, [2016]). More worryingly, the Ukrainian economy is perceived as being beset by persistent corruption and inefficiency (see e.g.: (RAPOZA, 2016), and has exhibited a tendency for further degradation. According to Ukrainian econo- mist Igor Tyshkevich, the Ukrainian economy has been consistently declining in terms of its economic complexity indicators (as measured by Harvard’s Centre for International Devel- opment (CID) 1995 methodology). Indeed, should present trends continue, it is feared that the country will have become hopelessly bankrupt by 2030 (TYSHKEVICH, 2016). Hence, the problem of State dysfunctionality is a powerful underlying conditioning factor which needs to be constantly borne in mind when referring to the current Ukrainian crisis. The socio-psychological context of the post-2013 crisis reflects the general disillusionment of the Ukrainian population regarding the perspectives of both the state and “official” civil so- 106 Argum. (Vitória), v. 8, n. 3, p. 105-121, set./dez. 2016. Competing interpretations of s0cio-political crisis in Ukraine in 2013-2016 ciety. In particular, according to the Kiev International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) integrat- ed survey project published in May 2015 (with V. Paniotto and N. Kharchenko being the presentation’s authors), contemporary Ukrainian society is dominated by pessimistic or at least restrained perceptions on the prospects of its further development. According to KIIS, 64% of respondents expect a further deterioration in the economic situation over the next 5 years (though 42% of respondents believe that it can be improved over the same period) (PANIOTTO; KHARCHENKO, [2015], p. 9-10). Negative attitudes towards key political in- stitutions of the State are also increasing. In March 2015, only 12% of those polled expressed confidence in the government, while confidence in Parliament was measured at minus 54% (PANIOTTO; KHARCHENKO, [2015], p. 24). In addition, a survey conducted by the Demo- cratic Initiatives Foundation and the Razumkov Centre’s sociological service among resi- dents of Ukraine for the period from 14 to 22 November 2015 (excluding Crimea and the un- controlled territories of Ukraine in Donetsk and Lugansk regions), in which 2009 respond- ents aged 18 and over were interviewed, demonstrated that Ukrainian society does not have trust in its political parties. Only 1.1% of respondents would “fully” trust these structures, while 39.2% of respondents were found to be “completely” distrustful of political parties. Only 10.7% would claim to be “generally” confident of the Parties’ efficiency, while 40% would “mostly not trust” them (RAZUMKOV CENTRE, 2015). Purely political interpretations of the meaning and direction of political transformations in Ukraine are directly dependent on the general positions of the relevant politicians, political parties and the related politicised expert community sections. Such a link between the polit- ical positions of the respective national elites and their representation in an expert form once again highlights the fact that many of the serious analysts often interpret events based on the strategic-philosophical positions of the political and intellectual leadership of their societies and their dominant components. Within the Ukrainian expert
Recommended publications
  • ZAD, Commune, Metropolis
    ZAD Commune Metropolis 24 1 Metropolis Against the Airport and Its World 23 ZAD Commune Metropolis 22 ‘That it might take a generation to build a victorious revolu- tionary movement in all its breadth does not cause us to waver. We envisage this with serenity.’ Just before boarding the ferry, you check the internet and see that the police have pulled out of two main crossroads in the ZAD. The Interior Ministry can no longer maintain its milita- rized presence without hindering its ability to protect Paris. In this period of weakness, the Zone to Defend will grow. You close the internet, walk out of the cafe, and into the streets of Calais, filled with immigrants trying to reach their families on the isle. It is the spring of 2013. Where are the words, where is the house, where are my ancestors, where are my loves and where are my friends? There are none, my child. Everything has to be built. You must build the language that you will live in, You must build the house cover artwork by Jannis Kounellis, “Untitled works”, 1999 where you’ll no longer be alone. You must find the ancestors layout & printing by the Anti-Cybernetics League, Oakland, CA, 2013 who will make you more free, “ZAD, Commune, Metropolis” originally published on 4/28/2013 at: and you must invent the new www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2013/04/509012.html sentimental education through which once again, for more info about the ZAD visit: you will love. zad.nadir.org/?lang=en zinelibrary.info/against-airport-and-its-world/ 4 21 ruins the old world has left within us and which remain to be demolished.'' a few preliminary notes..
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Civil Society from the Orange Revolution to Euromaidan: Striving for a New Social Contract
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2014, Baden-Baden 2015, pp. 219-235. Iryna Solonenko Ukrainian Civil Society from the Orange Revolution to Euromaidan: Striving for a New Social Contract This is the Maidan generation: too young to be burdened by the experi- ence of the Soviet Union, old enough to remember the failure of the Orange Revolution, they don’t want their children to be standing again on the Maidan 15 years from now. Sylvie Kauffmann, The New York Times, April 20141 Introduction Ukrainian civil society became a topic of major interest with the start of the Euromaidan protests in November 2013. It has acquired an additional dimen- sion since then, as civil society has pushed for reforms following the ap- pointment of the new government in February 2014, while also providing as- sistance to the army and voluntary battalions fighting in the east of the coun- try and to civilian victims of the war. In the face of the weakness of the Ukrainian state, which is still suffering from a lack of political will, poor governance, corruption, military weakness, and dysfunctional law enforce- ment – many of those being in part Viktor Yanukovych’s legacies – civil so- ciety and voluntary activism have become a driver of reform and an import- ant mobilization factor in the face of external aggression. This contribution examines the transformation of Ukrainian civil society during the period between the 2004 Orange Revolution and the present day. Why this period? The Orange Revolution and the Euromaidan protests are landmarks in Ukraine’s post-independence state-building and democratiza- tion process, and analysis of the transformation of Ukrainian civil society during this period offers interesting findings.2 Following a brief portrait of Ukrainian civil society and its evolution, the contribution examines the rela- tionships between civil society and three other actors: the state, the broader society, and external actors involved in supporting and developing civil soci- ety in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Hands Off Iraq! Teamster Coalition Crumbles, Washington Suffers Defeat
    • AUSTRALIA $2.00 • BELGIUM BF60 • CANADA $2.00 • FRANCE FF1 0 • ICELAND Kr150 • NEW ZEALAND $2.50 • SWEDEN Kr12 • UK £1.00 • U.S. $1.50 INSIDE Manuel Pineiro. on Che Guevara's. internationalism THE _.....PA.GES6~7 A SOCIALIST NEWSWEEKLY PUBLISHED IN THE INTERESTS OF WORKING PEOPLE VOL. 61.NO. 42 DECEMBER 1, 1997 U.S. gov't prohibits U.S. Hands off Iraq! Teamster Coalition crumbles, Washington suffers defeat BY MEGAN ARNEY president Washington's latest attempt to launch a military assault on Iraq and consolidate U.S. military and economic dominance in the from race region has ended in defeat. Unable to put back together the coalition that carried out BY BRIAN TAYLOR the U.S.-led slaughter in the 1990-91 Gulf After ordering new elections for the presi­ War, the U.S. rulers had to accept negotia­ dent of the International Brotherhood of tions spearheaded by Paris and Moscow to Teamsters (IBT), U.S. officials on Novem­ resolve the crisis they had provoked. At the ber 17 barred the current Teamster president, same time, the Clinton administration is Ronald Carey, from running. continuing its military buildup in the Per­ Washington launched its latest "anticor­ sian Gulf. Over the weekend of November 15-16, ruption" campaign against Teamster officials during the 15-day strike by 185,000 union Washington's campaign for a military air strike against Iraq, on the pretext of the al­ members at United Parcel Service in Au­ leged threat of Iraqi chemical weapons, was gust. That fight drew broad public support as the main demands -the creation of more still in full swing.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Unified Theory Analysing Workplace Ideologies: Marxism And
    Marxism and Racial Oppression: Towards a Unified Theory Charles Post (City University of New York) Half a century ago, the revival of the womens movementsecond wave feminismforced the revolutionary left and Marxist theory to revisit the Womens Question. As historical materialists in the 1960s and 1970s grappled with the relationship between capitalism, class and gender, two fundamental positions emerged. The dominant response was dual systems theory. Beginning with the historically correct observation that male domination predates the emergence of the capitalist mode of production, these theorists argued that contemporary gender oppression could only be comprehended as the result of the interaction of two separate systemsa patriarchal system of gender domination and the capitalist mode of production. The alternative approach emerged from the debates on domestic labor and the predominantly privatized character of the social reproduction of labor-power under capitalism. In 1979, Lise Vogel synthesized an alternative unitary approach that rooted gender oppression in the tensions between the increasingly socialized character of (most) commodity production and the essentially privatized character of the social reproduction of labor-power. Today, dual-systems theory has morphed into intersectionality where distinct systems of class, gender, sexuality and race interact to shape oppression, exploitation and identity. This paper attempts to begin the construction of an outline of a unified theory of race and capitalism. The paper begins by critically examining two Marxian approaches. On one side are those like Ellen Meiksins Wood who argued that capitalism is essentially color-blind and can reproduce itself without racial or gender oppression. On the other are those like David Roediger and Elizabeth Esch who argue that only an intersectional analysis can allow historical materialists to grasp the relationship of capitalism and racial oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Direction of Ecological Insurrections: Political Ecology Comes to Daggers with Fukuoka
    The direction of ecological insurrections: political ecology comes to daggers with Fukuoka Alexander Dunlap1 University of Oslo, Norway Abstract This article proposes a political ecology of resistance. This is done by putting forward insurrectionary political ecology as a lens of research and struggle, through the confluence of the complementary "political" practice of insurrectionary anarchism and the "ecological" method of "no-till natural farming." While seemingly different, the article argues that these practices are compatible, animating a political ecology of resistance around anti- authoritarian political and ecological lifeways. This direction, or compass, of insurrectionary political ecology is discussed in relation to other autonomous tendencies, as it complements and strengthens existing critical schools of thought heavily influenced by political ecology, such as (decolonial) degrowth, environmental justice and post-development. Insurrectionary political ecology deepens connections with scholarly rebels in political and ecological struggles outside—and rejecting—the university system. The article includes discussions of research ethics, various conceptions of "activism", autonomous tendencies and existing differences between the concepts of "revolution" and "insurrection", in order to debate notions of "counter-hegemony" and "duel- power." The overall purpose here is to offer a theoretical ethos for a political ecology of resistance that invigorates political praxis to subvert the ongoing socio-ecological catastrophes. Keywords: Resistance; insurrectionary political ecology; post-development; decolonization; degrowth; insurrectionary ecology; environmental justice Résumé Cet article propose une écologie politique de la résistance. Cela se fait en proposant «l'écologie politique insurrectionnelle» comme un prisme de recherche et de lutte, à travers la confluence de la pratique politique de l'anarchisme insurrectionnel et de la méthode «écologique» de «l'agriculture naturelle sans labour».
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]
  • CATASTROPHE BONDS OLIVER RESSLER Oliver Ressler Catastrophe Bonds
    CATASTROPHE BONDS OLIVER RESSLER Oliver Ressler Catastrophe Bonds Carol & Robert Bush Art Center, St. Norbert College Lawton Gallery, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay February 26-March 29, 2018 Published by St. Norbert College De Pere, WI 54115, USA Copyright © 2018 by St. Norbert College All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission of the author. Printed in the United States of America by Independent Printing Company Inc. ISBN 978-0-9851080-5-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018932081 Oliver Ressler: Catastrophe Bonds is offered as the second in a series of scholarly catalogs prepared by the art discipline at St. Norbert College. This catalog was funded in part by a generous grant from the Elizabeth Firestone Graham Foundation. Table of Contents Curators’ Foreword 8 About the Artist 9 About the International Visiting Scholars Program 9 One Struggle After Another by Marc James Léger 11 Precarity and Protest: States of Democracy in the Work of Oliver Ressler 19 by Jennifer A. González Catastrophe Bonds: An Interview with Oliver Ressler by Brandon Bauer 27 Works on View 42 Biographies 58 Acknowledgements 63 Curators’ Foreword Oliver Ressler’s work is both urgent and timely. Reactionary populist movements have been on the ascendency in both the United States and in Europe, and counter-movements seeking to reassert the values of liberal democracy have risen in opposition to the threats against civil liberties and the attacks upon democratic institutions across the West. This exhibition is the first survey of Ressler’s work in the U.S., and his focus on enacting and expanding forms of democracy is especially compelling and timely.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Graffiti in May 2018 at Nanterre University: a Linguistic Ethnographic Analysis
    Political graffiti in May 2018 at Nanterre University: A linguistic ethnographic analysis Camille Debras To cite this version: Camille Debras. Political graffiti in May 2018 at Nanterre University: A linguistic ethno- graphic analysis. Discourse and Society, SAGE Publications, 2019, 30 (5), pp.441-464. 10.1177/0957926519855788Discourse. hal-03110754 HAL Id: hal-03110754 https://hal.parisnanterre.fr//hal-03110754 Submitted on 14 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DAS0010.1177/0957926519855788Discourse & SocietyDebras 855788research-article2019 Political graffiti in May 2018 at Nanterre University: A linguistic ethnographic analysis Camille Debras Université Paris Nanterre, France Abstract Fifty years after May 68, spring 2018 in France was marked by mass student protest against the Parcoursup/ORE reform of university entry. After a riot police intervention on campus, Nanterre University was blocked and occupied. It was profoundly affected, both as a community and as a physical site. This linguistic ethnographic study proposes a systematic analysis of more than 500 physical interventions (political graffiti, tags and posters) on the campus during that period, to identify the functions of graffiti as political discourse. The graffiti (1) expressed resistance, reclaimed the university’s identity and manifested presence on site; (2) established dialogue with local and national authorities and (3) anchored the movement in a larger web of historical references and sites of political resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper David Schneider B.A., University of Colorado, 2018 M.A., University of Colorado, 2018
    Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper David Schneider B.A., University of Colorado, 2018 M.A., University of Colorado, 2018 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Russian 2018 i This thesis entitled: Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper Schneider has been approved for the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Professor Laura Osterman Professor John O’Loughlin Professor Artemi Romanov Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Abstract Schneider, Jasper David (M.A., Russian Department of the University of Colorado) Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine Thesis directed by Associate Professor Laura Osterman This paper closely examines trends surrounding Ukrainian nationalism following the events of the Maidan Revolution, and applies modernist nationalist thinking, including Benedict Anderson's theory of Imagined Communities and Anthony Smith’s theory of Ethno-Symbolism, to explain how the Ukrainian Nation is fundamentally changing at a core level. Anderson’s theory states that modern nations are defined by perceived shared connections between each individual member of a nation, and that these connections are often dictated by language, religion and other cultural icons. The Ukrainian nation has been under the control of Russia and the USSR for the better part of the last 1,000 years, and as a result what defines the Ukrainian nation in modern times is controversial even amongst Ukrainians.
    [Show full text]
  • Virilio's Parting Song: the Administration Of
    Special Section: Paul Virilio and Media Theory Media Theory Virilio’s Parting Song: Vol. 3 | No. 2 | 161-178 © The Author(s) 2019 The Administration of Fear CC-BY-NC-ND http://mediatheoryjournal.org/ and the Privatisation of Communism through the Communism of Affect ATHINA KARATZOGIANNI University of Leicester, UK ANDREW ROBINSON Independent Scholar, UK Abstract In The Administration of Fear (2012), Virilio returns to his old 1977 theme of speed as the driving force in politics. For Virilio, modern power involves ever- accelerating speed, but in this work he takes it further by arguing there is a ‘cult of speed’, which is not progress but its ideology, whereby fear is hidden by the ideology of progress. Speed’s impact is mediated by affect, which produces social effects, such as loss of continuous action, ecological destruction, devitalisation, placelessness, fractal fragmentation, and group nationalisms or communalisms. This situation becomes particularly dangerous when the affective structures, which become viral are those – so common in turbo-capitalism – of fear, panic and hatred. As a result of telepresence, there is a ‘synchronisation of emotion’ which goes beyond the earlier standardisation of opinion. Virilio christens this regime the ‘communism of affect’ leading to new forms of politics: transition from a democracy of opinion to a democracy of emotion. In this article, we elaborate on this line of argumentation, and then discuss how Virilio may resonate and inspire analysis of contemporary political phenomena, such as affective polarisation in anti-immigrant fears driving the far right in Anglo-Saxon politics, securitisation in France, developmentalist acceleration and telepresence in India, and the dystopian extremes of the Chinese model.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovak-Ukrainian Relations
    Alexander Duleba Research Center of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava December 2002 Slovak-Ukrainian Relations 1. Introduction Slovak-Ukrainian relations as to their changing bilateral agenda since 1993 when Slovakia became an independent state with its own foreign-policy making could be staggered into the following three distinct periods: 1) 1993-1998; 2) 1998-2000; and 3) since 2001. The Slovak attitude toward Ukraine during the first period might be characterized like an „indifferent neighborhood”. The then Slovak governments were viewing Ukraine rather like a „gate to Russia„ than a partner worthy of attention for itself. In the Slovak eastern policy at that period Ukraine was simply overshadowed by Russia. The new Slovak government that came to power in afterwards of the September 1998 elections has proclaimed a will to change the attitudes and practices of the previous years, but without real results. Quite on the contrary, years of 1998-2000 could be characterized like the most problematic years in the Slovak-Ukrainian modern relationship since both countries gained independence at the beginning of 1990s. The diplomatic competition of the both countries within the UN for chairmanship of the 52 General Assembly followed by the competition for a seat in the UN Security Council representing the Central-European group of countries, has stunned the Slovak-Ukrainian bilateral relations in period of 1998-2000. At that time Slovakia was supporting the Russian plan to construct a new natural gas pipeline – so called Jamal 2 - bypassing the territory of Ukraine via Belarus, Poland and Slovakia - which brought new negative impulses into the Slovak-Ukrainian agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainianization, Terror and Famine: Coverage in Lviv's Dilo and The
    1 Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 40.3 (2012): 431-52. Available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com. Ukrainianization, terror and famine: coverage in Lviv’s Dilo and the nationalist press of the 1930s Myroslav Shkandrij The years 1932-34 were a turning point in Soviet Ukraine. Ukrainian nationalism was declared the “greatest danger,” replacing Russian great-power chauvinism which had held this distinction since the Twelfth Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolshevik) in 1923. Pavel Postyshev arrived from Moscow to implement the new line, which was that Ukrainianization had hitherto been a “Petliurite” operation aimed at developing a national culture and state, instead of being a tool for bolshevization (See Martin 356, 362-68). Sweeping arrests and show trials were conducted in order to intimidate those who were conducting Ukrainianization and to make the republic completely subservient to the party centre in Moscow. By the late thirties, korenizatsiia (the policy of rooting bolshevik rule in local populations) was seen as best done through Russification, and not through cooperation with supporters of a national renaissance that, in Stalin’s view, had interfered with the strengthening of bolshevik power (Iefimenko 13). After gaining control of the party and crushing the Ukrainian peasantry, Stalin began undermining Ukrainianization by linking it to nationalism and the disasters of collectivization. An incorrect, “Petliurite” Ukrainianization, it was pronounced, had stimulated resistance to party policies, caused shortages in grain-requisitioning and led to revolts. The Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party stated on December 14, 1932, that a lack of “bolshevik vigilance” had allowed “the twisting of the party line” (Ibid.
    [Show full text]