DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Information Campaign Against Ukrainian State and Defence Forces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Information Campaign Against Ukrainian State and Defence Forces RUSSIAN INFORMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST UKRAINIAN STATE AND DEFENCE FORCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED BY THE NATO STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE RUSSIAN INFORMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST UKRAINIAN STATE AND DEFENCE FORCES The report was executed for the NATO StratCom operations continue to play a substantial role in COE by the Centre for Applied Research under the the current crisis in Ukraine. Russia uses various Estonian National Defence College. media channels to conduct its operations against The objective of this research is to identify how the Ukraine, including governmental and private TV Russian media portrays the Ukrainian military and channels (e.g. Pervyi Kanal, Rossija 1, NTV, Russia security structures, including the policies of the Today, LifeNews), radio (e.g. Radio Mayak), mobile Kiev government and their ‘collaboration’ with the phone operators (e.g. KyivStar), Internet sources West. The research group looks at how messages (including online publications, e.g. Regnum, TV disseminated in the media attempt to construct Zvezda, Кomsomolskaya Pravda, Itar Tass, RIA attitudes and advocate behaviours in parallel Novosti ) and social media networks (e.g. YouTube, to political and military events on the ground in Facebook, Vk.com, odnoklassniki.ru). Some Ukraine. The research covers the period from 1 April Ukrainian sources hold pro-Russian attitudes until 31 December 2014 and analyses the following and can also be used to spread disinformation Russian media: Regnum, Komsomolskaya Pravda (e.g. Vesti). The separatist People’s Republics of and TV Zvezda. These media are important because Donetsk and Luhansk have their own channels they target not only Russian internal audience but producing anti-Ukrainian propaganda (e.g. dnr- also the Russian-speaking communities in the news.com, novorus.info). The current study has former territory of the USSR. focused on the media channels that represent the Russian mainstream—Komsomolskaya Pravda, TV The researchers used standardised content Zvezda, Regnum. These mass media channels are analysis in accordance to a specially developed generally critical against the Ukrainian government Coding Manual and enriched the findings with and armed forces, but do not offer a critical view data from 25 structured interviews with Ukrainian of the Russian government; they justify Russian representatives (media, political and military policy in Ukraine and see the Ukrainian crisis as a experts, as well as soldiers and officers involved in battlefield between Russia and West, referring to the military conflict). the clash of civilisations with the West (primarily From December 2014 the Russian military has the US and NATO, but also the European Union) adopted a new doctrine that explicitly states that allegedly intending to advance its sphere of information superiority is essential to achieving influence towards Russian borders. victory on the physical battleground in the modern war. It is crucial for NATO to draw appropriate RUSSIA’S INFORMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST conclusions from the on-going conflict in Europe in UKRAINE order to further strengthen the unity of the alliance and avoid such conflict scenarios between Russia • The Russian information campaign in and NATO in the future. Ukraine in 2014 was a massive, multifaceted, responsive, and coherent operation that can Russia’s information activities have played a be considered a proxy war. significant role in the overall military operations carried out in the territory of East Ukraine since • Russia denies direct involvement, but supports 2014. Information operations were used at all local pro-Russian separatists to maintain the levels starting with the political level (against the conflict. Military activities are supported by state of Ukraine, state structures, politicians) up an active media campaign that undermines to the tactical level for justifying military actions Ukrainian authorities and their political goals initiated by pro-Russian forces. Information to reunite the country. confrontation and a variety of psychological NATO STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE • Russia avoids any steps that may promote • Ukraine has created posters and flyers to international involvement in crisis inform the Ukranian population about the management and does not support the efforts situation, especially in the Eastern part of of international organisations (UN, OSCE) to the country, showing pro-Russian separatist stabilize the situation. political and military leaders such as Alexander Zakharchenko, Alexander Borodai, Alexander • The Ukrainian authorities as well as Hodakovsky, and others as criminals. interested international organisations are considered to be merely puppets of the West • Ukrainian activists and NGOs have established under the guidance of primarily the United websites to disprove false information and fakes from Russia (e.g. www.stopfake.org, States and NATO. During Putin’s presidency, en.informnapalm.org). Russia has declared the restoration of Russia as a Eurasian empire as its national goal. However, according to the ruling REPRESENTATION OF THE UKRAINIAN SIDE IN THE RUSSIAN MEDIA narrative, Russia cannot be a real Eurasian Empire if it does not control Ukraine and In Russia’s information campaigns against Ukraine, the Black Sea, and control over Crimea is of Moscow propagandists use a number of different utmost importance. In the Russian national myths and narratives that are mostly related to mythology, Ukraine was an integral part of the Second World War, Stepan Bandera, and the birth of the Russian Empire. Ukraine’s the Ukrainian nationalists of the 1940s, but also special position makes crisis management refer to Nazism and violence. Additionally, they there extremely sensitive. use the images of the ‘glorious’ Soviet period. Such manipulations in the Russian media are very • Russian information activities skilfully target a common since Vladimir Putin came to power in the wide range of audiences with different beliefs Russian Federation. and convictions. The anti-Ukrainian approach Russia’s information campaign targets a number of relies on a variety of stylistic forms and different audiences in Ukraine. It aims to disparage nuances. It can take the form of sensationalism the Ukrainian government and demonstrate that it and blaming (e.g. Komsomolskaya Pravda) or is a corrupt, illegal, and fascist junta. The Ukrainian use a more restrained approach (e.g. Regnum, defence forces (including the volunteer units) are TV Zvezda). often compared to Einsatztruppen (executions • In addition to the content of the messages, squads), Nazis, killers, terrorists, bandits, and Russia technically ensures that certain servants of the Kiev junta. Ukraine is portrayed as messages reach specific audiences and others a failed state, or a puppet of NATO and Western do not (i.e. by controlling TV and radio towers, countries. Russian media channels have published mobile phone operators etc.). fake news stories about foreign soldiers and NATO troops in Ukraine, or try to show that some NATO UKRAINIAN COUNTER-ACTIVITIES or EU states help the Kiev junta and Ukrainian army, • Ukraine has stopped the transmission of who kill civilians and are Nazi sympathisers. Russian TV channels (e.g. NTV, RTR, Pervyi In the three media outlets analysed for this research, kanal, LifeNews) to Ukraine and promoted its Ukrainian Armed Forces were mostly mentioned in the own channels (e.g. Hromadske TV) to replace context of combat activities, terrorism and violence. them. RUSSIAN INFORMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST UKRAINIAN STATE AND DEFENCE FORCES The representatives of the Ukrainian Armed Forces country where there is effectively no democracy were mostly labelled as fascists and execution squads or freedom of speech cannot be mistaken for a (reference to the World War II) under the command source of alternative opinions. In this respect, of the Kiev “junta”. The Ukrainian Government NATO could foster closer cooperation with was mostly labelled as fascists and connected with numerous NGOs, think tanks, and human rights violence. watchdogs (e.g. Freedom House, Reporters without Borders, Amnesty International, etc.) that Often they were characterised as a failed government are already producing quality materials regarding unable to rule the country, take care of the citizens the real situation in Russia. Same goes to myth- and or command the army. disinformation- busting initiatives. Regnum used the widest selection of references Through thorough monitoring and intelligence to historical events, including WWII and the Soviet gathering, NATO should continuously pay attention period, but the share of articles referring to past to non-military actions that may have military events did not account for more than 10% of the co-objectives, including all operations related overall number of articles examined. Therefore, to information warfare, which have increasing the parallels that are often drawn between importance in contemporary conflicts. Particular Ukraine and Nazi Germany do not come in the focus should be put on the activities and conflicts form of references to the actual events of the past. with the Russian involvement. Instead, they appear in the form of labels used to describe target groups in Ukraine. While TV NATO should increase its own information Zvezda and Regnum only compare the Ukrainian capabilities and be prepared in the event of any government with Nazis, Komsomolskaya Pravda kind of information confrontation that would
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ukrainian Civil Society from the Orange Revolution to Euromaidan: Striving for a New Social Contract
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2014, Baden-Baden 2015, pp. 219-235. Iryna Solonenko Ukrainian Civil Society from the Orange Revolution to Euromaidan: Striving for a New Social Contract This is the Maidan generation: too young to be burdened by the experi- ence of the Soviet Union, old enough to remember the failure of the Orange Revolution, they don’t want their children to be standing again on the Maidan 15 years from now. Sylvie Kauffmann, The New York Times, April 20141 Introduction Ukrainian civil society became a topic of major interest with the start of the Euromaidan protests in November 2013. It has acquired an additional dimen- sion since then, as civil society has pushed for reforms following the ap- pointment of the new government in February 2014, while also providing as- sistance to the army and voluntary battalions fighting in the east of the coun- try and to civilian victims of the war. In the face of the weakness of the Ukrainian state, which is still suffering from a lack of political will, poor governance, corruption, military weakness, and dysfunctional law enforce- ment – many of those being in part Viktor Yanukovych’s legacies – civil so- ciety and voluntary activism have become a driver of reform and an import- ant mobilization factor in the face of external aggression. This contribution examines the transformation of Ukrainian civil society during the period between the 2004 Orange Revolution and the present day. Why this period? The Orange Revolution and the Euromaidan protests are landmarks in Ukraine’s post-independence state-building and democratiza- tion process, and analysis of the transformation of Ukrainian civil society during this period offers interesting findings.2 Following a brief portrait of Ukrainian civil society and its evolution, the contribution examines the rela- tionships between civil society and three other actors: the state, the broader society, and external actors involved in supporting and developing civil soci- ety in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper David Schneider B.A., University of Colorado, 2018 M.A., University of Colorado, 2018
    Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper David Schneider B.A., University of Colorado, 2018 M.A., University of Colorado, 2018 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Russian 2018 i This thesis entitled: Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine by Jasper Schneider has been approved for the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Professor Laura Osterman Professor John O’Loughlin Professor Artemi Romanov Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Abstract Schneider, Jasper David (M.A., Russian Department of the University of Colorado) Ethno-Symbolism and Decommunization in the Post-Maidan Ukraine Thesis directed by Associate Professor Laura Osterman This paper closely examines trends surrounding Ukrainian nationalism following the events of the Maidan Revolution, and applies modernist nationalist thinking, including Benedict Anderson's theory of Imagined Communities and Anthony Smith’s theory of Ethno-Symbolism, to explain how the Ukrainian Nation is fundamentally changing at a core level. Anderson’s theory states that modern nations are defined by perceived shared connections between each individual member of a nation, and that these connections are often dictated by language, religion and other cultural icons. The Ukrainian nation has been under the control of Russia and the USSR for the better part of the last 1,000 years, and as a result what defines the Ukrainian nation in modern times is controversial even amongst Ukrainians.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovak-Ukrainian Relations
    Alexander Duleba Research Center of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava December 2002 Slovak-Ukrainian Relations 1. Introduction Slovak-Ukrainian relations as to their changing bilateral agenda since 1993 when Slovakia became an independent state with its own foreign-policy making could be staggered into the following three distinct periods: 1) 1993-1998; 2) 1998-2000; and 3) since 2001. The Slovak attitude toward Ukraine during the first period might be characterized like an „indifferent neighborhood”. The then Slovak governments were viewing Ukraine rather like a „gate to Russia„ than a partner worthy of attention for itself. In the Slovak eastern policy at that period Ukraine was simply overshadowed by Russia. The new Slovak government that came to power in afterwards of the September 1998 elections has proclaimed a will to change the attitudes and practices of the previous years, but without real results. Quite on the contrary, years of 1998-2000 could be characterized like the most problematic years in the Slovak-Ukrainian modern relationship since both countries gained independence at the beginning of 1990s. The diplomatic competition of the both countries within the UN for chairmanship of the 52 General Assembly followed by the competition for a seat in the UN Security Council representing the Central-European group of countries, has stunned the Slovak-Ukrainian bilateral relations in period of 1998-2000. At that time Slovakia was supporting the Russian plan to construct a new natural gas pipeline – so called Jamal 2 - bypassing the territory of Ukraine via Belarus, Poland and Slovakia - which brought new negative impulses into the Slovak-Ukrainian agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpathian Ruthenia As an Imagined Colonial Space
    THE CZECHOSLOVAK ORIENT: CARPATHIAN RUTHENIA AS AN IMAGINED COLONIAL SPACE BY GEOFFREY BROWN A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Victoria University of Wellington 2016 Figure 0.1 – “Let’s Get To Know the People and Beauty of Subcarpathian Ruthenia!” Czech Tourist Guidebook Cover (1937) “Poznejte lid a krásy Podkarpatské Rusi!” (Uzhhorod: Národohospodářský sbor pro zemi Podkarpatoruskou, 1937). ii Abstract In 1919 the territory of Subcarpathian Ruthenia joined the new state of Czechoslovakia under the terms set by the Treaty of Saint Germain. During the following twenty years a relationship developed between Czechs and Ruthenia’s Rusyn inhabitants which this study considers as an example of imperialism and colonialism. The Czech media applied a colonial framework in its portrayals of Ruthenia, encouraging the Czech public to see the poor and undeveloped territory as a colony ruled from Prague. Rusyns also used colonial terminology as a means of criticizing the Czech officials who ruled them. The colonial discourse occurred despite a shared Slavic ethnic background and even as representatives of both nations expressed brotherhood and solidarity towards one another. Some Czech officials sent to Ruthenia adopted imperialist attitudes and practices in an environment of minimal bureaucratic oversight, leading to friction with the Rusyn intelligentsia. Faced with the threat of Czechization, Rusyns struggled to achieve autonomy and an anti-imperialist movement supporting Rusyn rights developed among Czech Communists. The Prague government sought to defend its actions in Ruthenia against accusations of mistreatment by the Hungarian revisionist movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Business in Ukraine
    CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN UKRAINE 2018 All of the information included in this document is for informational purposes only, and may not reflect the most current legal developments, judgments, or settlements. This information is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The Firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything, and in respect of the consequences of anything, done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of Baker McKenzie’s Conducting Business in Ukraine brochure. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this document without first seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances. CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN UKRAINE 2018 Baker McKenzie Renaissance Business Center 24 Bulvarno-Kudriavska St. Kyiv 01601, Ukraine Tel.: +380 44 590 0101 Fax: +380 44 590 0110 [email protected] www.bakermckenzie.com\ukraine CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN UKRAINE Table of Content 1. Ukraine — An Overview ...................................................... 11 1.1 Geography, Topography and Population ........................................ 11 1.2 Government and Political and Legal Systems .............................. 12 1.3 Regional Structure ............................................................................... 15 1.4 Economy ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOKOLOGO AFRICAN ANARCHIST COLLECTIVE TOKOLOG Iissues S U E ##22 • Nnovembero V E M B E R 220130 1 3 • RR22 • Pphone:H O N E : 00727 2 33999 9 009129 1 2
    N EWSLETTER OF THE TOKOLOGO AFRICAN ANARCHIST COLLECTIVE TOKOLOG IIssues s u e ##22 • NNovembero v e m b e r 220130 1 3 • RR22 • PPhone:h o n e : 00727 2 33999 9 009129 1 2 INSIDE: Stop Evictions, Stop the State, Defend the Working Class and Poor • Pre- Paid Electricity Meters or Power to the People? • Wake Up the Power of the Working Class and Poor • The Struggle at Kwa-Masisa Hostel in Sebokeng • Activists Demand End to Misappropriation of Funds and Wasteful Expenditure: Khutsong’s Corrupt Municipality • The Story of the Makhnovists and the Anarchist Revolution in the Ukraine, 1918- 1921 • Ukraine’s Revolution as Anarchist, Popular Class National Self- Determination and Decolonisation • The Story of the Korean Anarchists and the Anarchist Revolution in Manchuria, 1929-1931 • Who was Kim Joa-Jin, Korean Anarchist Revolutionary? • Korean Anarchist Revolu- tion: Decolonisation through Anarchism • TAAC Statement of Intent (isiXhosa/ SeTswana/English) Editorial Welcome to the second issue of Tokologo, produced by the Tokologo African Anarchist Collective. Why do we publish this? We publish it because our country is crying out for an alternative. And that alternative is anarchism, which stands for a free and democratic society, run from the grassroots, in communities and workplaces, and based on equality and freedom. In such a society, wealth like land and factories would be collectively owned; production would be directed to meeting basic needs and ensuring environmental sustainability. In such a society, everyone would have a say in all matters that aff ect them; poverty and deprivation would be abolished; hatred and competition would be replaced by cooperation and mutual aid by all peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Interpretations of the Socio-Political Crisis in Ukraine in 2013-20161
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v8i3.14505 ARTIGO Competing interpretations of the socio-political crisis in Ukraine in 2013-20161 Interpretações em disputa sobre a crise sociopolítica na Ucrânia em 2013-2016 Valentin YAKUSHIK2 Abstract: This article addresses the sharp ideological conflicts which underlie attempts to characterise and explain the on-going socio-political crisis in Ukraine, which started in 2013. It argues that both academic and non-academic commentators have presented diametrically opposed interpretations of the nature of the events of Autumn 2013 – Spring 2014, as well as of the relevant interpretations of the continuing socio-political crisis facing the country. Characterisations of these events vary from a revolution of dignity, denunciations of foreign intervention and separatist movements to assertions of a coup d’état which promoted and provoked regionalist movements and civil war. A second objective of the article is therefore to demonstrate the limitations of one- dimensional, strikingly ideologised interpretations of these events and the need for scholars engaged in the social sciences to generate unbiased, multi-dimensional, multi-level visions of complex, contradictory, tectonic transformations in contemporary Ukraine. Keywords: Ukraine - Revolution. Interpretation. Resumo: Este artigo aborda os agudos conflitos ideológicos que subjazem às tentativas de caracterizar e expli- car a crise sociopolítica em curso na Ucrânia, que abriu em 2013. Argumenta-se que os comentaristas acadêmi- cos e não acadêmicos apresentaram interpretações diametralmente opostas da natureza dos eventos do outono de 2013 – primavera de 2014, bem como as interpretações relevantes da contínua crise sócio-política que o país enfrenta. As caracterizações desses eventos variam de uma revolução da dignidade, denúncias de intervenção estrangeira e movimentos separatistas a asserções de um golpe de estado que promoveu e provocou movimen- tos regionalistas e guerra civil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle and the Trident: U.S.-Ukraine Relations in Turbulent
    CHAPTER 1 Establishing Relations n the eve ning of December 1, 1991, Larry Napper, one of the OState Department’s foremost Soviet experts and destined to be the last director of its Office of Soviet Union Affairs, walked the streets of Kyiv. He had accompanied Assistant Secretary of State for Eu ro- pean affairs Thomas M. T. Niles to observe the in depen dence referen- dum that the Ukrainians had held earlier that day. The results of the vote streamed in, and they sent a resounding message. In the end, with a large turnout, more than 90 percent of the voters had opted for an in de pen dent state. Inde pen dence won even in Crimea, garnering 54 percent of the vote in the only part of Ukraine where ethnic Rus sians constituted a majority of the population. As Napper tracked the incom- ing vote tally and watched the reaction of Ukrainians in the capital, he quietly admired their inspirational act of self- determination and thought to himself: “It’s clear; the jig is up for the Soviet Union.” Washington now had to prepare urgently for the final collapse of its Cold War rival and the emergence of the New In de pen dent States, including Ukraine. And, after that happened, the U.S. government needed to get about the business of establishing a relationship with the new nation. 9 10 The Eagle and the Trident Ukraine’s Long and Complex History At its height in the early eleventh century, Kyivan Rus’ was the largest state in Eu rope.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Ukrainian History (From Various Sources) Ukraine Was The
    Summary of Ukrainian history (from various sources) Ukraine was the center of the first eastern Slavic state, Kyivan Rus, which during the 10th and 11th centuries was the largest and most powerful state in Europe. Weakened by internecine quarrels and Mongol invasions, Kyivan Rus was incorporated into the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and eventually into the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The cultural and religious legacy of Kyivan Rus laid the foundation for Ukrainian nationalism through subsequent centuries. A new Ukrainian state, the Cossack Hetmanate, was established during the mid-17th century after an uprising against the Poles. Despite continuous Muscovite pressure, the Hetmanate managed to remain autonomous for well over 100 years. During the latter part of the 18th century, most Ukrainian ethnographic territory was absorbed by the Russian Empire. Following the collapse of czarist Russia in 1917, Ukraine was able to achieve a short-lived period of independence (1917-20), but was reconquered and forced to endure a brutal Soviet rule that engineered two forced famines (1921-22 and 1932-33) in which over 8 million died. In World War II, German and Soviet armies were responsible for some 7 to 8 million more deaths. Although final independence for Ukraine was achieved in 1991 with the dissolution of the USSR, democracy and prosperity remained elusive as the legacy of state control and endemic corruption stalled efforts at economic reform, privatization, and civil liberties. A peaceful mass protest "Orange Revolution" in the closing months of 2004 forced the authorities to overturn a rigged presidential election and to allow a new internationally monitored vote that swept into power a reformist slate under Viktor YUSHCHENKO.
    [Show full text]
  • 971 Copyright © 2020 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O
    European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2020, 9(4) Copyright © 2020 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. All rights reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic European Journal of Contemporary Education E-ISSN 2305-6746 2020, 9(4): 971-983 DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2020.4.971 www.ejournal1.com IMPORTANT NOTICE! Any copying, reproduction, distribution, republication (in whole or in part), or otherwise commercial use of this work in violation of the author(s) rights will be prosecuted in accordance with international law. The use of hyperlinks to the work will not be considered copyright infringement. Transformations in the Field of public education of the Ukrainian State in 1918. Part 1 Sergey I. Degtyarev a , b , *, Vladyslava M. Zavhorodnia а, Lyubov G. Polyakova b , с a Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine b International Network Center for Fundamental and Applied Research, Washington, USA c Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation Abstract The government policy of the Ukrainian State, conducted in the field of public education within 1918 year, is reviewed in this article. The first part of the research covers the peculiarity of the work of the Ukrainian Ministry of Public Education, its structure and personnel. The authors paid separate attention to the formation process of the higher education institutions system and the internal organization of their activities. The research is based on a corpus of published normative documents, memoirs of contemporaries of the events described here. The authors concluded that in general the government policy of the Ukrainian State in the area of the public education system development was very successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Rusyns of the Carpathians : Competing Agendas of Identity
    RUSYNS OF THE CARPATHIANS: COMPETING AGENDAS OF IDENTITY A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Of Georgetown University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In Russian and East European Studies By Alexandra C. Wiktorek, B.A. Washington, DC April 28, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Alexandra Wiktorek All Rights Reserved !! RUSYNS OF THE CARPATHIANS: COMPETING AGENDAS OF IDENTITY Alexandra Wiktorek, B.A. Thesis Adviser: Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the cultural revival and nation-building movement of the Rusyns, an East Slavic ethnic group whose homeland along the Carpathians straddles the border between the former Soviet Union and the European Union. While in the 19th century and again after World War I, Rusyns launched national movements, they never gained statehood as did other neighboring nations. Instead, Rusyns remain divided among several European states. During communist rule, they were officially classified as Ukrainians, their closest ethnic neighbors. After the Revolutions of 1989 and the subsequent demise of the Soviet Union, however, the Rusyns have emerged as a cohesive group recognized officially as a national minority in all the countries where they live except for Ukraine. The new Rusyn national movement brought about the revival of an identity once considered irretrievably outdated by reviving Rusyn language, engaging with the nations around them, and creating international organizations to unite all Rusyns. This question is explored here through the lens of liberal nationalism theory, especially as formulated by Yael Tamir, who argues that nations are defined culturally and that a stateless people may achieve self-determination when they live in a state whose institutions provide recognition and space for them to develop unhindered.
    [Show full text]