DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 9 of the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 Which Was Introduced by the Civil Law (Wrongs) Amendment Act 2005 and Commenced on 23 February 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 9 of the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 Which Was Introduced by the Civil Law (Wrongs) Amendment Act 2005 and Commenced on 23 February 2006 PROTECTING REPUTATION DEFAMATION PRACTICE, PROCEDURE AND PRECEDENTS THE MANUAL by Peter Breen Protecting Reputation Defamation Practice, Procedure and Precedents THE MANUAL © Peter Breen 2014 Peter Breen & Associates Solicitors 164/78 William Street East Sydney NSW 2011 Tel: 0419 985 145 Fax: (02) 9331 3122 Email: [email protected] www.defamationsolicitor.com.au Contents Section 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 Section 2 Current developments and recent cases ................................................. 5 Section 3 Relevant legislation and jurisdiction ..................................................... 11 3.1 Uniform Australian defamation laws since 2006 ........................................ 11 3.2 New South Wales law [Defamation Act 2005] ........................................... 11 3.3 Victoria law [Defamation Act 2005] .......................................................... 13 3.4 Queensland law [Defamation Act 2005] ..................................................... 13 3.5 Western Australia law [Defamation Act 2005] .......................................... 13 3.6 South Australia law [Defamation Act 2005] .............................................. 14 3.7 Tasmania law [Defamation Act 2005] ........................................................ 14 3.8 Northern Territory law [Defamation Act 2006] .......................................... 15 3.9 Australian Capital Territory law [Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002] ............. 15 3.10 United Kingdom law [Defamation Act 2013] ............................................ 16 3.11 A review of the uniform defamation laws .................................................. 16 Section 4 Alternatives to defamation proceedings ............................................... 19 4.1 Action for breach of the tort of privacy ...................................................... 19 4.2 Equitable doctrine of breach of confidence ................................................ 22 4.3 Claim for injunctive relief ........................................................................... 24 4.4 Misleading or deceptive conduct action...................................................... 28 4.5 Claim for injurious falsehood ..................................................................... 30 4.6 Statutory remedies for hate speech ............................................................. 32 4.7 The Australian Press Council ...................................................................... 36 4.8 The Australian Communications and Media Authority .............................. 38 4.9 Criminal Defamation ................................................................................... 41 Section 5 Before commencing proceedings ........................................................... 43 5.1 Defamation‘s colourful history ................................................................... 43 5.2 The nature of defamation ............................................................................ 45 5.3 What constitutes publication? ..................................................................... 48 5.4 Who has the right to sue? ............................................................................ 49 5.5 Do you sue the publisher or the author? ..................................................... 52 5.6 How much can you sue for? ........................................................................ 55 5.7 How much can you expect to receive?........................................................ 58 5.8 Who pays the legal costs? ........................................................................... 64 5.9 What are the risks of losing? ....................................................................... 64 5.10 Letter of demand – Concerns Notice .......................................................... 65 5.11 Pre-publication inquiries and preliminary discovery .................................. 68 Section 6 Commencing proceedings ...................................................................... 75 6.1 Time limitations .......................................................................................... 75 6.2 Deciding which court has jurisdiction ........................................................ 76 i 6.3 Was the defamatory material written or spoken? ....................................... 78 6.4 Identifying the defamatory imputations ...................................................... 82 6.5 Drafting the Statement of Claim ................................................................. 85 6.6 Filing and serving the documents ............................................................... 86 6.7 Appearing at court on the return date.......................................................... 87 6.8 Representing the Defendant ........................................................................ 88 Section 7 Defending proceedings ........................................................................... 89 7.1 Assessing the motives of the plaintiff ......................................................... 89 7.2 Filing and serving a Notice of Appearance ................................................. 92 7.3 Seeking further and better particulars of the claim ..................................... 93 7.4 Objecting to the Statement of Claim ........................................................... 94 7.5 The decision whether to get Counsel‘s advice ............................................ 96 7.6 Do you want a jury to hear the case? .......................................................... 96 7.7 Apologies and offers to make amends ........................................................ 98 7.8 Offers of Compromise .............................................................................. 102 Section 8 Available defences ................................................................................. 105 8.1 The plaintiff‘s imputations are true in substance ...................................... 105 8.2 The words complained of are contextually true ........................................ 108 8.3 Absolute privilege ..................................................................................... 110 8.4 Common law qualified privilege ............................................................... 112 8.5 Statutory qualified privilege ...................................................................... 114 8.6 Honest opinion (common law fair comment) ........................................... 118 8.7 Innocent dissemination ............................................................................. 121 8.8 Triviality – unlikelihood of harm .............................................................. 122 8.9 Defences defeated by malice ..................................................................... 123 Section 9 Interlocutory procedures ..................................................................... 127 9.1 Updating the short minutes of order ......................................................... 127 9.2 Seeking further and better particulars of the Defence .............................. 127 9.3 The plaintiff‘s Reply to the Defence ......................................................... 129 9.4 Seeking further and better particulars of the Reply .................................. 129 9.5 Considerations for further strike out applications ..................................... 130 9.6 The defendant‘s Answer to the Reply ....................................................... 131 9.7 Discovery of documents ............................................................................ 131 9.8 Administration of Interrogatories .............................................................. 133 9.9 Answers to Interrogatories ........................................................................ 134 Section 10 The trial .................................................................................................. 135 10.1 Considerations for jury trials ..................................................................... 135 10.2 Trials without juries (case study – the Dragon Boat case) ....................... 136 10.3 Evidence in support of the plaintiff‘s case ................................................ 174 10.4 Evidence in support of the defendant‘s case ............................................. 177 10.5 Final submissions for the plaintiff ............................................................ 178 10.6 Final submissions for the defendant .......................................................... 180 10.7 Calculation of damages ............................................................................. 181 ii 10.8 Interest on damages ................................................................................... 183 10.9 Costs including indemnity costs ............................................................... 184 Section 11 The ten rules for success in the defamation courts ............................ 189 Rule 1 Mere vulgar abuse is not defamatory ........................................................ 189 Rule 2 Free speech is worth protecting ................................................................ 189 Rule 3 What matters is the meaning of the words ................................................ 190 Rule 4 Testing the water before publication ......................................................... 190 Rule 5 Malice kills defences in defamation.........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Media Journal - Australian Edition - Media Monitor Vol 3:2 2009
    Global Media Journal - Australian Edition - Media Monitor Vol 3:2 2009 Australian Media Monitor 2009 3:2 Tim Dwyer * GMJ Vol. 3, Issue Two * Australian Media Monitor In this edition of AMM, I highlight some of the key developments in media industries, policy and regulation in the final half of 2009. There have been important changes in several industry sectors, and often we are seeing that these moves on the media monopoly board will ripple out and interconnect with other corporations, directorships, policies, content and access issues for audiences. The sweeping proposals for change to separate Telstra Corporation’s wholesale and retail businesses that emerged in the second half of the year, are a case in point. The potential consequences of this particular law and its related policy and regulatory frameworks intersect most vividly with content and access issues in the potential sale of Foxtel, arising from the Telstra restructuring. Not only are there major ramifications for the rollout of the Rudd Government’s National Broadband Network (NBN), there are crucial flow-on issues for major media corporations such as the Seven Network and Consolidated Media Holdings, for advertisers, for internet service providers (ISPs), content creators, channel packagers and for regulators. And there are implications for the sale of the legacy free-to-air television spectrum in the ‘digital dividend’ as analog television is switched over to digital, and as the shakeout between traditional and new media continues. * Mogul Wars The second half of the year started dramatically (with headlines like “Raid launched on Consolidated Media”, Sydney Morning Herald, Business Day, Steffens, 9 July 2009, “Stokes share grab puts Packer in tight squeeze”, Australian Financial Review, Shoebridge and White, 10 July 2009, and “Seven takes stake in Cons Media to 19.91 percent”, AAP, 16 July 2009) when the papers began reporting that Kerry Stokes’ Seven Network had lifted its stake in James Packer’s Consolidated Media Holdings (CMH) to the maximum level allowed before launching a takeover.
    [Show full text]
  • Filicide: the Australian Story
    Children Australia Filicide: the Australian story www.cambridge.org/cha Thea Brown1 , Danielle Tyson2 and Paula Fernandez Arias1 1Department of Social Work, Monash University, Caulfield East, VIC, Australia and 2Criminology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia Review Article Abstract Cite this article: Brown T, Tyson D, and A filicide death, meaning the killing of a child by their parent or equivalent guardian, is a tragic Fernandez Arias P (2020). Filicide: the Australian story. Children Australia 45:279–284. event. Sadly, a UK study suggests Australia has the fourth highest rate of filicide among similar https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2020.47 developed nations. Since Australian research studies on the incidence of filicide, or indeed on any other aspect of the problem, are limited, it is impossible to know if this finding is correct or Received: 13 May 2020 not. However, in the last several years more research on filicide has emerged in Australia and by Revised: 25 August 2020 Accepted: 25 August 2020 reviewing the recent research in detail, this article develops an integrated analysis of Australian filicide research and contributes to the knowledge bank on Australian filicide that can be used Keywords: by professionals undertaking practice and research in intervention and prevention. Analysis of Filicide; filicide victims; victim vulnerability; the studies shows one child dies at the hands of a parent every fortnight and that this number filicide perpetrators; filicide in Australia; filicide rates; perpetrator profiles; filicide risks; has not changed for many years. The analysis identifies the profiles of victims and perpetrators. domestic violence; mental illness; partnership The constellation of circumstances and stressors associated with each of the parental perpetrator breakdown; substance abuse; criminal history; groups is discussed, including the perpetrators’ contact with, and mostly unsuccessful use of, filicide prevention services.
    [Show full text]
  • Kathleen Folbigg Homepage This Page Set up by Dr Robert N Moles
    Networked Knowledge Media Reports Networked Knowledge Kathleen Folbigg Homepage This page set up by Dr Robert N Moles [Underlining where it occurs is for NetK editorial emphasis] On 12 March 2021 Quentin McDermott of the BBC reported ‘Kathleen Folbigg: Could science free Australian jailed for killing babies?’ Imagine for a moment what it must feel like if, as a mother, you give birth to four children, one after another, each of whom, as infants, dies from natural causes over a 10-year period. Then imagine being wrongly accused of smothering them all and being sentenced to 30 years in jail for four terrible crimes you did not commit. That narrative is emerging as potentially the true story of Kathleen Folbigg, an Australian mother from the Hunter Valley region of New South Wales (NSW). Branded at her trial in 2003 as "Australia's worst female serial killer", Folbigg has already spent nearly 18 years in prison after being found guilty of the manslaughter of her firstborn Caleb, and the murder of her three subsequent children, Patrick, Sarah and Laura. But now, fresh scientific evidence is turning this case on its head. Last week a petition signed by 90 eminent scientists, science advocates and medical experts was handed to the Governor of NSW, requesting a pardon for Folbigg and her immediate release. Among the signatories were two Nobel laureates and two Australians of the Year, a former chief scientist, and the president of the Australian Academy of Science, Professor John Shine, who commented: "Given the scientific and medical evidence that now exists in this case, signing this petition was the right thing to do." If Folbigg is freed and her convictions are overturned, her ordeal will be seen as the worst miscarriage of justice in Australia's history - worse even than the case of Lindy Chamberlain, who served three years in prison after being wrongly convicted of murdering her baby, Azaria, at Uluru.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii: Mary Alice Evatt, Modern Art and the National Art Gallery of New South Wales
    Cultivating the Arts Page 394 CHAPTER 9 - WAGING WAR ON THE ESTABLISHMENT? II: MARY ALICE EVATT, MODERN ART AND THE NATIONAL ART GALLERY OF NEW SOUTH WALES The basic details concerning Mary Alice Evatt's patronage of modern art have been documented. While she was the first woman appointed as a member of the board of trustees of the National Art Gallery of New South Wales, the rest of her story does not immediately suggest continuity between her cultural interests and those of women who displayed neither modernist nor radical inclinations; who, for example, manned charity- style committees in the name of music or the theatre. The wife of the prominent judge and Labor politician, Bert Evatt, Mary Alice studied at the modernist Sydney Crowley-Fizelle and Melbourne Bell-Shore schools during the 1930s. Later, she studied in Paris under Andre Lhote. Her husband shared her interest in art, particularly modern art, and opened the first exhibition of the Contemporary Art Society in Melbourne 1939, and an exhibition in Sydney in the same year. His brother, Clive Evatt, as the New South Wales Minister for Education, appointed Mary Alice to the Board of Trustees in 1943. As a trustee she played a role in the selection of Dobell's portrait of Joshua Smith for the 1943 Archibald Prize. Two stories thus merge to obscure further analysis of Mary Alice Evatt's contribution to the artistic life of the two cities: the artistic confrontation between modernist and anti- modernist forces; and the political career of her husband, particularly knowledge of his later role as leader of the Labor opposition to Robert Menzies' Liberal Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Yearbook
    Golden Yearbook Golden Yearbook Stories from graduates of the 1930s to the 1960s Foreword from the Vice-Chancellor and Principal ���������������������������������������������������������5 Message from the Chancellor ��������������������������������7 — Timeline of significant events at the University of Sydney �������������������������������������8 — The 1930s The Great Depression ������������������������������������������ 13 Graduates of the 1930s ���������������������������������������� 14 — The 1940s Australia at war ��������������������������������������������������� 21 Graduates of the 1940s ����������������������������������������22 — The 1950s Populate or perish ���������������������������������������������� 47 Graduates of the 1950s ����������������������������������������48 — The 1960s Activism and protest ������������������������������������������155 Graduates of the 1960s ���������������������������������������156 — What will tomorrow bring? ��������������������������������� 247 The University of Sydney today ���������������������������248 — Index ����������������������������������������������������������������250 Glossary ����������������������������������������������������������� 252 Produced by Marketing and Communications, the University of Sydney, December 2016. Disclaimer: The content of this publication includes edited versions of original contributions by University of Sydney alumni and relevant associated content produced by the University. The views and opinions expressed are those of the alumni contributors and do
    [Show full text]
  • Will Kyle and Jackie O Give Mix106.5 the KIIS of Life?
    Article No. 5379 Available on www.roymorgan.com Link to Roy Morgan Profiles Thursday, 16 January 2014 Will Kyle and Jackie O give Mix106.5 the KIIS of life? Monday 20 January promises to be a massive day for Sydney breakfast radio. For those who’ve been living in a cave in Outer Mongolia (or outside Sydney, as the case may be!), that’s the date long-time 2Day FM breakfast DJs Kyle Sandilands and Jackie O start their new show at rival station Mix106.5 FM. It’s also the date Mix106.5 FM will be rebranded as KIIS FM. So will these major changes have the desired effect for Mix, boosting both their audience and advertising revenue? Roy Morgan investigates… The total Sydney radio market comprises almost 3.9 million people. According to data from Roy Morgan Research, market leader 2Day’s total audience comprises 15% of this (568,000 people), well ahead of Mix106.5’s 10% market share (393,000 people). With 506,000 listeners, or 13% market share, Nova 96.9 FM has Sydney’s second-largest commercial audience. Battle of the breakfasters Breakfast (5.30–9am) is traditionally one of commercial radio’s most competitive timeslots, and has been dominated in Sydney by Southern Cross Austereo-owned 2Day FM’s Kyle and Jackie O Show for years. In the 12 months to September 2013, 349,000 Sydneysiders (or 9% of the city’s total radio market) listened to the show at least once in any given seven-day period. 2Day, Mix106.5 and Nova 96.9: total vs breakfast audience numbers 600 568 506 IMMEDIATE RELEASE 500 393 400 FOR 349 300 262 Audience ('000) 206 200 100 0 2Day FM Mix 106.5 Nova 96.9 Total Audience Breakfast Show Audience Source: Roy Morgan Single Source (Australia), October 2012-September 2013 (n = 10,135).
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Street Public School Heritage Impact Statement
    Fort Street Public School Heritage Impact Statement SSD 10340 Prepared by Curio Projects For School Infrastructure NSW 11 March 2020 Document Information Citation Curio Projects 2020, Fort Street Public School—Heritage Impact Statement. Prepared for School Infrastructure NSW (SI). Local Government Area City of Sydney Council Cover Image Proposed Fort Street Public School Development. (FJMT Studio 2020) ISSUE ISSUE VERSION NOTES/COMMENTS AUTHOR REVIEWED No. DATE 1 15/11/2019 Draft Report For client review Sam Cooling, Natalie Vinton Tatiana Barreto Natalie Vinton 2 2/3/2020 Revised Final SSDA Revised Package Sam Cooling Natalie Vinton Draft Feb 2020. For client review 3 11/3/2020 For SSDA Issue Revised with client Sam Cooling Natalie Vinton comments This report has been prepared based on research by Curio Projects specialists. Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced at the end of each section and/or in figure captions. Unless otherwise specified or agreed, copyright in intellectual property of this report vests jointly in Curio Projects Pty Ltd. Curio Projects Pty Ltd Suite 9/17 Thurlow Street Redfern NSW 2016 Australia FORT STREET PUBLIC SCHOOL—HERITAGE IMPACT STATEMENT- SSDA ISSUE | SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE | MARCH 2020 Curio Projects Pty Ltd 2 Contents Document Information ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Independent Inquiry Into the Media and Media Regulation Is Protected by Copyright
    REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE MEDIA AND MEDIA REGULATION BY THE HON R FINKELSTEIN QC ASSISTED BY PROF M RICKETSON REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR BROADBAND, COMMUNICATIONS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 28 FEBRUARY 2012 © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN: 978-0-642-75424-0 (PDF version) 978-0-642-75425-7 (DOC version 978-0-642-75426-4 (printed version) The Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation is protected by copyright. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted, all material included this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/). The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website, as is the full legal code for CC BY 3.0 AU licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode). The document must be attributed as the ‘Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation’. Using the Commonwealth Coat of Arms The terms of use for the Coat of Arms are available from www.itsanhonour.gov.au Other use The use of any material in this report in a way not permitted or otherwise allowed under the Copyright Act 1968 may be an infringement of copyright. Where you wish to use the material on this in a way that is beyond the scope of the terms of use that apply to it, you must lodge a request for further authorisation with the department. Authorisation Please address requests and enquiries concerning further authorisation to: The Media Inquiry Secretariat Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy PO Box 2154 CANBERRA ACT 2601 [email protected] Letter of transmittal Contents Executive summary—conclusions and recommendations 7 Media codes of ethics and accountability 7 Changing business models and quality journalism 10 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD WALKLEY Conference What’S the Story Will Be Held at the National Film & Sound CATEGORY SPONSOR Archive in Canberra on November 29 & 30
    WALKLEY AWARD FINALISTS ANNOUNCED THURSDAY, 18 OCTOBER 2012 From scoops to scandals, world events and previously untold stories – the Walkley Award finalists for 2012 demonstrate the ongoing strength and diversity of journalism in Australia. Finalists in the general categories of the 57th annual Walkley Awards for Excellence in Journalism were announced at simultaneous events in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane tonight. Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance federal secretary Christopher Warren said the high standard of 2012 Walkley Award entries showed the enduring value of quality journalism in a challenging period for the media industry. “This year’s Walkley Award entries show that despite the financial and regulatory pressures being placed on journalists and newsrooms, the demand for high-quality, independent journalism continues growing every year,” Mr Warren said. Finalists for the Business Award, the Nikon-Walkley Awards for Excellence in Photojournalism and the Documentary Award were announced earlier this week. The 2012 Walkley Awards attracted more than 1300 entries, with winners to be announced on November 30 at the Awards Presentation and Gala Dinner at Parliament House in Canberra, broadcast on SBS. A special Capital Edition of The Walkley Foundation’s annual media GOLD WALKLEY conference What’s the Story will be held at the National Film & Sound CATEGORY SPONSOR Archive in Canberra on November 29 & 30. The conference features the best line-up of local and international speakers for any media conference in Australia, including New York Times founding interactive news editor Aron Pilhofer, ABC Director of News Kate Torney and Canberra Times editor-at-large Jack Waterford. Both the Gala Dinner and Conference are sponsored by Centenary of Canberra, an initiative of the ACT Government, to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Australia’s capital city in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications for David Clune 2020 2019 2018
    Publications for David Clune 2020 Clune, D., Smith, R. (2019). Back to the 1950s: the 2019 NSW Clune, D. (2020), 'Warm, Dry and Green': release of the 1989 Election. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 34(1), 86-101. <a Cabinet papers, NSW State Archives and Records Office, 2020. href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3316/informit.950846227656871">[ More Information]</a> Clune, D. (2020). A long history of political corruption in NSW: and the downfall of MPs, ministers and premiers. The Clune, D. (2019). Big-spending blues. Inside Story. <a Conversation. <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-long- href="https://insidestory.org.au/big-spending-blues/">[More history-of-political-corruption-in-nsw-and-the-downfall-of-mps- Information]</a> ministers-and-premiers-147994">[More Information]</a> Clune, D. (2019). Book Review. The Hilton bombing: Evan Clune, D. (2020). Book review: 'Dead Man Walking: The Pederick and the Ananda Marga. Australasian Parliamentary Murky World of Michael McGurk and Ron Medich, by Kate Review, 34(1). McClymont with Vanda Carson. Melbourne: Vintage Australia, Clune, D. (2019). Book Review: "Run for your Life" by Bob 2019. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 34(2), 147-148. <a Carr. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 65(1), 146- href="https://www.aspg.org.au/wp- 147. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12549">[More content/uploads/2020/06/Book-Review-Dead-Man- Information]</a> Walking.pdf">[More Information]</a> Clune, D. (2019). Close enough could be good enough. Inside Clune, D. (2020). Book review: 'The Fatal Lure of Politics: The Story. <a href="https://insidestory.org.au/close-enough-could- Life and Thought of Vere Gordon Childe', by Terry Irving.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    22912 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Wednesday 19 May 2010 __________ The President (The Hon. Amanda Ruth Fazio) took the chair at 2.00 p.m. The President read the Prayers. APPROPRIATION (BUDGET VARIATIONS) BILL 2010 WEAPONS AND FIREARMS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010 Bills received from the Legislative Assembly. Leave granted for procedural matters to be dealt with on one motion without formality. Motion by the Hon. Tony Kelly agreed to: That the bills be read a first time and printed, standing orders be suspended on contingent notice for remaining stages and the second readings of the bills be set down as orders of the day for a later hour of the sitting. Bills read a first time and ordered to be printed. Second readings set down as orders of the day for a later hour. PRIVILEGES COMMITTEE Report: Citizen’s Right of Reply (Mrs J Passas) Motion by the Hon. Kayee Griffin agreed to: That the House adopt the report. Pursuant to standing orders the response of Mrs J. Passas was incorporated. ______ Reply to comments by the Hon Amanda Fazio MLC in the Legislative Council on 18 June 2009 I would like to reply to comments made by the Hon Amanda Fazio MLC on 18 June 2009 in the Legislative Council about myself. Ms Fazio makes two accusations, which adversely affect my reputation: That I am "an absolute lunatic"; and That apart from "jumping on the bandwagon of a genuine community campaign for easy access" at Summer Hill railway station, I did not have anything to do with securing the easy access upgrade at Summer Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Bathurst010611.Pdf
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES BANCO COURT ALLSOP P AND JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT Wednesday 1 June 2011 SWEARING-IN CEREMONY OF THE HONOURABLE THOMAS FREDERICK BATHURST QC AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES 1 BATHURST CJ: President, I have the honour to announce that I have been appointed Chief Justice of this Court. I present to you my Commission. 2 ALLSOP P: Thank you Chief Justice. Would you please be seated whilst the Commission is read. (Commission read) 3 Chief Justice, I now ask you to rise and take the oaths of office, first the oath of allegiance and then the judicial oath. (Oaths of office taken) 4 THE HONOURABLE GREG SMITH SC MP, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES: Your Honour, on behalf of the State of New South Wales and the New South Wales Bar, I congratulate you on your appointment as Chief Justice of the New South Wales Supreme Court. 5 You are now custodian of one of the oldest public offices in Australia. The first Chief Justice, Sir Francis Forbes, took his place in 1824 and you will - 1 - be the seventeenth. However, number five, Sir Julian Salomons, stepped down after fifteen days before he even got to hear a case. His problem was that his appointment was not well received. 6 This is not a problem facing your Honour. In fact, your elevation has been widely acclaimed, particularly among the Sydney Commercial Bar. One such beneficiary said, “Tom was simply briefed in every commercial matter of any significance going.
    [Show full text]