DOCSLIB.ORG

Weed Control and Crop Tolerance of Micro-Encapsulated Acetochlor Applied Sequentially in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weed Control and Crop Tolerance of Micro-Encapsulated Acetochlor Applied Sequentially in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Weed control and crop tolerance of micro-encapsulated acetochlor applied sequentially in glyphosate-resistant soybean Amit J. Jhala1, Mayank S. Malik2, and John B. Willis2 1Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915, USA (e-mail: [email protected]); and 2Monsanto Company, 800 North Lindberg Ave., St. Louis, MO 63167, USA. Received 6 December 2014, accepted 21 May 2015. Published on the web 8 June 2015. Jhala, A. J., Malik, M. S. and Willis, J. B. 2015. Weed control and crop tolerance of micro-encapsulated acetochlor applied sequentially in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 973Á981. Acetochlor, an acetamide herbicide, has been used for many years for weed control in several crops, including soybean. Micro-encapsulated acetochlor has been recently registered for preplant (PP), pre-emergence (PRE), and post-emergence (POST) application in soybean in the United States. Information is not available regarding the sequential application of acetochlor for weed control and soybean tolerance. The objectives of this research were to determine the effect of application timing of micro-encapsulated acetochlor applied in tank-mixture with glyphosate in single or sequential applications for weed control in glyphosate- resistant soybean, and to determine its impact on soybean injury and yields. Field experiments were conducted at Clay Center, Nebraska, in 2012 and 2013, and at Waverly, Nebraska, in 2013. Acetochlor tank-mixed with glyphosate applied alone PP, PRE, or tank-mixed with flumioxazin, fomesafen, or sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron provided 99% control of common waterhemp, green foxtail, and velvetleaf at 15 d after planting (DAP); however, control declined to 540% at 100 DAP. Acetochlor tank-mixed with glyphosate applied PRE followed by early POST (V2 to V3 stage of soybean) or late POST (V4 to V5 stage) resulted in ]90% control of common waterhemp and green foxtail, reduced weed density to 52 plants m2 and biomass to 512 g m2, and resulted in soybean yields3775 kg ha1. The sequential applications of glyphosate plus acetochlor applied PP followed by early POST or late POST resulted in equivalent weed control to the best herbicide combinations included in this study and soybean yield equivalent to the weed free control. Injury to soybean wasB10% in each of the treatments evaluated. Micro-encapsulated acetochlor can be a good option for soybean growers for controlling grasses and small-seeded broadleaf weeds if applied in a PRE followed by POST herbicide program in tank- mixture with herbicides of other modes of action. Key words: Acetamide, crop tolerance, post-emergence herbicides, residual herbicides, resistance management, sequential applications, tank-mixture, weed biomass For personal use only. Jhala, A. J., Malik, M. S. et Willis, J. B. 2015. De´sherbage par applications se´quentielles de microcapsules d’ace´tochlor dans le soja re´sistant au glyphosate et tole´rance de la culture au traitement. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 973Á981. On utilise l’ace´tochlor depuis de nombreuses anne´es pour lutter contre les mauvaises herbes dans diverses cultures, dont le soja. Les E´tats-Unis ont homologue´depuis peu les microcapsules de cet herbicide a` base d’ace´tamide comme traitement avant les semis, avant la leve´e et apre` s la leve´e pour le soja. Toutefois, on ne posse` de pas d’informations sur le de´sherbage par applications se´quentielles d’ace´tochlor, ni sur la tole´rance du soja a` un tel traitement. La pre´sente recherche devait e´tablir les conse´quences du moment d’application d’un me´lange de microcapsules d’ace´tochlor et de glyphosate en un traitement unique ou en traitement se´quentiel pour lutter contre les mauvaises herbes dans les cultures de soja re´sistant au glyphosate; elle devait aussi pre´ciser l’impact du traitement sur les dommages cause´s au soja et sur le rendement de la culture. Les expe´riences ont e´te´re´alise´es au champ, a` Clay Center (Nebraska), en 2012 et 2013, ainsi qu’a` Waverly (Nebraska), en 2013. L’application du me´lange d’ace´tochlor et de glyphosate avant les semis ou la leve´e, seul ou en combinaison avec de la flumioxazine, du fomesafen ou du sulfentrazone plus du chlorimuron de´truit 99 % de l’amaranthe rugueuse, de la se´taire verte et de l’abutilon quinze jours apre` s les semis. Cependant, le de´sherbage diminue a` 40 % et moins cent jours apre` s les semis. Le me´lange d’ace´tochlor et de glyphosate applique´avant la leve´e, puis au de´but (stade V2 ou V3 du soja) ou a` la fin de la leve´e (stade V4 ou V5) de´truit au moins 90 % de l’amaranthe rugueuse et de la se´taire verte, ce qui re´duit la densite´ Can. J. Plant Sci. Downloaded from pubs.aic.ca by University of Nebraska Lincoln on 09/09/15 des adventices a` un maximum de 2 plants par m2 et leur biomasse a` un maximum de 12 g par m2, avec pour re´sultat un rendement du soja supe´rieur a` 3 775 kg par hectare. Les applications se´quentielles de glyphosate et d’ace´tochlor avant les semis, puis au de´but ou a` la fin de la leve´e assurent une lutte e´quivalente aux meilleures combinaisons d’herbicides examine´es dans le cadre de l’e´tude et de´bouchent sur un rendement en soja e´quivalent a` celui de la parcelle te´moin de´sherbe´e. Les traitements e´value´s causent moins de dix pour cent de dommages au soja. Les microcapsules d’ace´tochlor Abbreviations: AMATA, common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer; ABUTH, green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv; DAP, days after planting; DBP, days before planting; POST,post- emergence application; PP, preplant application; PRE, pre-emergence application; SETVI, velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik Can. J. Plant Sci. (2015) 95: 973Á981 doi:10.4141/CJPS-2014-422 973 974 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE pourraient constituer une bonne solution de rechange aux cultivateurs de soja pour lutter contre les gramine´es et les dicotyle´dones a` petite graine quand l’application a lieu avant la leve´e et est comple´te´e par un de´sherbage post-leve´e graˆce a` un me´lange compose´de microcapsules et d’herbicides a` mode d’action diffe´rent. Mots cle´s: Ace´tamide, tole´rance des cultures, herbicides post-leve´e, herbicides re´siduels, gestion de la re´sistance, applications se´quentielles, me´lange en citerne, biomasse des mauvaises herbes After corn (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max L. resistant soybean. Weed control can be increased by Merr.) is the most widely grown field crop in the delaying glyphosate applications to allow new weeds United States (United States Department of Agriculture to emerge (Tharp and Kells 1999); however, delayed 2012). Weed management is an important component of application can result in soybean yield reduction as a soybean production to secure higher yields (Norsworthy result of cropÁweed competition during the initial growth 2003). Application of pre-emergence (PRE) and/or post- stage. Therefore, tank-mixing glyphosate and acetochlor emergence (POST) herbicides is the primary method may provide better weed control compared with either for weed control in soybean (Riar et al. 2013). The herbicide applied alone. There is no information in the acetamides are widely used in corn, cotton (Gossypium scientific literature on the effect of sequential applica- hirsutum L.), sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], tions of glyphosate plus acetochlor in respect to weed and soybean for control of annual grasses and small- control and soybean tolerance. seeded broadleaf weeds. Acetochlor is listed as the fourth Glyphosate has been used extensively for POST weed most commonly used herbicide in the United States control in glyphosate-resistant crops for more than a by the United States Environmental Protection Agency decade; however, herbicide programs depending only (USEPA) (Grube et al. 2011). The solubility of aceto- on glyphosate resulted in the evolution of glyphosate- chlor in water is 223 mg L1 at 258C and generally resistant weeds (Owen and Zelaya 2005). Therefore, provides 3 to 5 wk of residual weed control, depending on soybean growers are tank-mixing herbicides with glypho- application rate, soil type, weed pressure, and weather sate to expand the utility of glyphosate-based herbicide conditions (Parker et al. 2005). Acetochlor is primarily programs (Young 2006). In addition, tank-mixing her- absorbed by emerging plant shoots and seedling roots, bicides with different modes of action is one of the and is xylem-transported by acropetal movement (Boger methods to control herbicide-resistant weeds (Beckie 2006; et al. 2000). Susceptible grass weeds that do emerge Norsworthy et al. 2012; Mellendorf et al. 2013). For appear twisted and malformed with leaves tightly rolled example, acetochlor has been premixed with atrazine in the whorl that cannot unfurl properly, while broadleaf (Anonymous 2012a,b) as well as with clopyralid and seedlings may have slightly cupped or crinkled leaves, flumetsulam for PRE weed control in corn (Anonymous especially under cold conditions (Weisshaar and Boger 2011b). For personal use only. 1987). Weed control programs that include herbicides with Acetamide herbicides are usually applied PRE in corn multiple modes of action are needed due to the rapid and soybean; however, micro-encapsulated acetochlor increases in the number of herbicide-resistant weeds has been recently registered for PP, PRE, and POST (Kaur et al. 2014). Soybean growers can benefit from application in soybean (Anonymous 2011a). Acetochlor micro-encapsulated acetochlor applied PRE or POST in is sometimes applied 14 to 60 d before planting as an early tank-mix with other registered herbicides that provide preplant (EPP) application (Bunting et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn and Soybean Mode of Action Herbicide Chart
    By Premix Corn and Soybean This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer Herbicide Chart to the Mode of Action chart for more information. Component Repeated use of herbicides with the same Site of Premix Trade Active Action site of action can result in the development of Trade Name ® Name ® Ingredient Group* herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First ............... Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Axiom ........................... Define flufenacet 15 This publication was designed for commercial printing, color shifts may occur on other printers and on-screeen. Sencor metribuzin 5 Basis . ........................... Resolve rimsulfuron 2 Harmony GT thifensulfuron 2 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Bicep II Magnum .......... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist Bicep Lite II Magnum .... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 you in selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in Boundary ...................... Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 herbicide use and 2) to rotate among herbicides with different Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ ............... Breakfree acetochlor 15 sites of action to delay the development of herbicide resistance. atrazine atrazine 5 Breakfree ATZ Lite ........ Breakfree acetochlor 15 Number of atrazine atrazine 5 resistant weed Buctril + Atrazine ......... Buctril bromoxynil 6 atrazine atrazine 5 species in U.S. Bullet ............................ Micro-Tech alachlor 15 Site of Chemical Active atrazine atrazine 5 Action Product Examples Camix ........................... Callisto mesotrione 28 Group* Site of Action Family Ingredient (Trade Name ®) Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Lipid Canopy DF ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse and Field Evaluation of Isoxaflutole for Weed Control In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Greenhouse and field evaluation of isoxaflutole for weed control in maize in China Received: 27 June 2017 Ning Zhao, Lan Zuo, Wei Li, Wenlei Guo, Weitang Liu & Jinxin Wang Accepted: 18 September 2017 Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to provide a reference for pre-emergence (PRE) Published: xx xx xxxx application of isoxaflutole on maize in China. In greenhouse study, the isoxaflutole PRE application at 30 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1 could effectively control large numbers of weeds, especially some large-seeded broadleaves, tested in this study. The tolerance results indicated 21 maize hybrids showed different responses to isoxaflutole under greenhouse conditions. In 2015 and 2016, field experiments were conducted to determine and compare the weed control efficacy and safety to Zhengdan 958 maize with 6 herbicide treatments. In both years, isoxaflutole PRE at 100 to 250 g a.i. ha−1 was sufficient to provide satisfactory full-season control of the dominant common broadleaf and grass weeds in the field. Temporary injury to maize was observed with isoxaflutole treatments of 125, 150, and 250 g a.i. ha−1 in both years, but plants recovered within 4 to 6 wk. To maximize maize yield and provide satisfactory weed control, a range of 100 to 150 g a.i. ha−1 of isoxaflutole is recommended, depending on the soil characteristics, weather, and weed species present at the experimental site. Based on the results, isoxaflutole PRE has good potential for weed control in maize in China. Maize was planted on more hectares than any other crops in China from 2010 to 2014, with an average of 35 million ha planted per year and yield averaging 5,779 kg per ha per year1.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program
    U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program Stream water-quality analytes Major ions and trace elements­schedule 998 (20 constituents) Pesticides ­­schedule 2437 (229 compounds) Alkalinity 1H­1,2,4­Triazole Arsenic 2,3,3­Trichloro­2­propene­1­sulfonic acid (TCPSA) Boron 2,4­D Calcium 2­(1­Hydroxyethyl)­6­methylaniline Chloride 2­[(2­Ethyl­6­methylphenyl)amino]­1­propanol Fluoride 2­Amino­N­isopropylbenzamide Iron 2­Aminobenzimidazole Lithium 2­Chloro­2',6'­diethylacetanilide 2­Chloro­4,6­diamino­s­triazine {CAAT} Magnesium (Didealkylatrazine) pH 2­Chloro­4­isopropylamino­6­amino­s­triazine Potassium 2­Chloro­6­ethylamino­4­amino­s­triazine {CEAT} Total dissolved solids 2­Chloro­N­(2­ethyl­6­methylphenyl)acetamide Selenium 2­Hydroxy­4­isopropylamino­6­amino­s­triazine 2­Hydroxy­4­isopropylamino­6­ethylamino­s­triazin Silica e {OIET} Sodium 2­Hydroxy­6­ethylamino­4­amino­s­triazine Specific conductance 2­Isopropyl­6­methyl­4­pyrimidinol Strontium 3,4­Dichlorophenylurea Sulfate 3­Hydroxycarbofuran Turbidity 3­Phenoxybenzoic acid Vanadium 4­(Hydroxymethyl)pendimethalin 4­Chlorobenzylmethyl sulfoxide Suspended sediment 4­Hydroxy molinate 4­Hydroxychlorothalonil Nutrients­schedule 2430 (18 constituents) 4­Hydroxyhexazinone A Inorganic carbon, suspended Acephate Dissolved inorganic carbon Acetochlor ammonia + organic nitrogen (unfiltered­Kjeldahl) Acetochlor oxanilic acid ammonia + organic nitrogen (filtered­Kjeldahl) Acetochlor sulfonic acid Ammonia as N, filtered Acetochlor sulfynilacetic acid nitrite, filtered Alachlor
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, SHARDA ACETOCHLOR 30.2% +
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPA Reg. Number: Date of Issuance: Office of Pesticide Programs Registration Division (7505P) 83529-119 9/21/20 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: Term of Issuance: X Registration Reregistration Conditional (under FIFRA, as amended) Name of Pesticide Product: Sharda Acetochlor 30.2% + Fomesafen 7.1% SE II Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code): Anna Armstrong Agent for Sharda USA LLC c/o Wagner Regulatory Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 640 Hockessin, DE 19707 Note: Changes in labeling differing in substance from that accepted in connection with this registration must be submitted to and accepted by the Registration Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product always refer to the above EPA registration number. On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above named pesticide is hereby registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use if it has been covered by others. This product is conditionally registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(7)(A).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weed Control
    2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual The 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual is published by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, N.C. State University, Raleigh, N.C. These recommendations apply only to North Carolina. They may not be appropriate for conditions in other states and may not comply with laws and regulations outside North Carolina. These recommendations are current as of November 2013. Individuals who use agricultural chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure to obtain current information about usage regulations and examine a current product label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your county Cooperative Extension agent. The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial products or services in this document does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service nor discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL Chemical Weed Control in Field Corn ...................................................................................................... 224 Weed Response to Preemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................... 231 Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Human Urinary Metabolites of Acetochlor In
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2007) 17, 559–566 r 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1559-0631/07/$30.00 www.nature.com/jes Identification of human urinary metabolites of acetochlor in exposed herbicide applicators by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry DANA B. BARRa, CYNTHIA J. HINESb, ANDERS O. OLSSONa, JAMES A. DEDDENSb,c, ROBERTO BRAVOa, CYNTHIA A.F. STRILEYb, JESSICA NORRGRANa AND LARRY L. NEEDHAMa aCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA bCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safetyand Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA cDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universityof Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Acetochlor is a preemergent chloroacetanilide herbicide used to control annual grasses and small-seeded broadleaf weeds. It is the second most abundantly applied herbicide on corn crops in the United States; however, human metabolites associated with known exposure to acetochlor have not been positively identified and confirmed. We positively identified acetochlor mercapturate (ACM) as a metabolite of acetochlor in urine samples collected during a 24-h period from custom (commercial) applicators who had applied acetochlor on either the day of or the day before urine collection. Concentrationsin applicator urine samplesrangedfrom 0.5 to 449 mg/l (0.3–121 mg/g creatinine). We found that ACM accounted for asmuch as42% of the total acetochlor-derived metabolites; however, as the exposure level decreased (based on total acetochlor metabolite level), ACM became a less abundant metabolite of acetochlor (o17%). Unmetabolized acetochlor was also measured in the urine samples analyzed. At high exposures (classified as 4100 mg/l), acetochlor accounted for about 0.8% of the total excreted acetochlor metabolites( B2% of the ACM concentrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Procedure Manual
    Laboratory Procedure Manual Analyte: Specific Organophosphorous Pesticides, Synthetic Pyrethroids, Selected Herbicides and DEET Matrix: Urine Method High-Performance Liquid Chromatography- Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization & Heated Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Method No: 6103.01 Revised: as performed by: Organic Analytical Toxicology Branch Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health contact: Dr. Dana Barr Phone: 770-488-7886 Fax: 770-488-7609 Email: [email protected] Dr. Eric J. Sampson, Director Division of Laboratory Sciences Important Information for Users CDC periodically refines these laboratory methods. It is the responsibility of the user to contact the person listed on the title page of each write-up before using the analytical method to find out whether any changes have been made and what revisions, if any, have been incorporated Universal Pesticides OAT-DLS Table Of Contents 1. Clinical Relevance and Summary of Test Principle ..............................................................................1 2. Safety Precautions................................................................................................................................2 a. Reagent Toxicity or Carcinogenicity..................................................................................................2 b. Radioactive Hazards.........................................................................................................................2 c. Microbiological Hazards....................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Part 180—Tolerances And
    Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–11 Edition) (iv) The data and information sub- 180.4 Exceptions. mitted in support of the petition. 180.5 Zero tolerances. (v) The notice of filing of the peti- 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, tion. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of policy. (3) Any order issued under § 180.29(f) of this chapter to which the objection Subpart B—Procedural Regulations related, the regulation that was the subject of that order, and each related 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. emptions for pesticide residues in or on raw agricultural commodities or proc- (4) The comments submitted by mem- essed foods. bers of the public in response to the 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- Notice of Filing or Notice of Proposed dice. Rulemaking, and the information sub- 180.9 Substantive amendments to petitions. mitted as part of the comments, the 180.29 Establishment, modification, and rev- Administrator’s response to comments ocation of tolerance on initiative of Ad- and the documents or information re- ministrator. lied on by the Administrator in issuing 180.30 Judicial review. 180.31 Temporary tolerances. the regulation or order. 180.32 Procedure for modifying and revoking (5) All other documents or informa- tolerances or exemptions from toler- tion submitted to the docket for the ances. rulemaking in question under parts 177 180.33 Fees. or part 180 of this chapter. 180.34 Tests on the amount of residue re- (6) The Notice of Hearing published maining. under § 179.20.
    [Show full text]
  • A Corn and Soybean Herbicide Chart
    By Premix This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names Corn and Soybean so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer to the Mode of Action chart on the left for more information. Herbicide Chart Component Premix Site of Action Trade Name ® Trade Name ® Active Ingredient Group Repeated use of herbicides with the same Anthem Zidua pyroxasulfone 15 Cadet fluthiacet-ethyl 14 site of action can result in the development of Autority Assist Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Pursuit imazethapyr 2 herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Autority MTZ Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Sencor metribuzin 5 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Authority XL Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Classic chlorimuron 2 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist you in Autumn Super Autumn iodosulfuron 2 selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in herbicide use and ------- thiencarbazone 2 Basis Blend Resolve rimsulfuron 2 2) to rotate among herbicides with different sites of action to delay the Harmony thifensulfuron 2 development of herbicide resistance. Bicep II Magnum Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 (Bicep Lite II Mag) AAtrex atrazine 5 The Site of Action Group is a classification system developed by the Weed Science Society of America. Boundary Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ Breakfree acetochlor 15 (Breakfree ATZ Lite) AAtrex atrazine 5 Number of resistant Bullet
    [Show full text]