DOCSLIB.ORG

Thailand's Community-Based Eco-Industrial Town Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thailand's Community-Based Eco-Industrial Town Development Case Study Thailand’s Community-Based Eco-Industrial Town Development Acknowledgements The author would like to express sincere gratitude to Dr. Decha Pimpisut, Executive Director of Bureau of Public Participatory Promotion of Department of Industrial Works, Ministry of Industry of Thailand, for the information and insights he shared for this case study. This project also has been greatly benefited from extensive support by Khan Ram-Indra and Pasnakorn Maikate of GGGI Thailand in reaching out to Thai government officials and collecting information, and from review and editing contributions by Orestes Anastasia of GGGI’s Investment and Policy Solutions Division. Author Eunice Jieun Kim, Global Green Growth Institute This case study is intended to serve as an example of policies and practices relevant to pursuing a green growth model of development. It describes activities and programs performed by organizations other than GGGI, and GGGI itself had no direct role in their development, adoption, or implementation. Copyright © June 2017 Global Green Growth Institute Jeongdong Building 19F 21-15 Jeongdong-gil Jung-gu, Seoul 04518 Republic of Korea The Global Green Growth Institute does not make any warranty, either express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed of the information contained herein or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Global Green Growth Institute. Contents 01 Summary ............................................. 2 02 Context ................................................ 5 03 Approach ............................................. 7 04 Outcomes ......................................... 12 05 Lessons .............................................. 14 Global Green Growth Institute 01 Summary Thailand has been a pioneer in promoting special cooperation with the German Technical economic zones, and has achieved noteworthy Cooperation Agency (GIZ) in 2000 as an attempt to success as a result of its unique approach of make highly polluting IEs more sustainable. promoting inclusive but voluntary industry Although that program was unsuccessful, it participation and by actively engaging local provided the model for a new Thai MoIn initiative communities. launched in 2010 which focused more comprehensively on developing sustainable Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate (IE) is the most industrial communities, under a program titled as symbolic icon of Thailand’s industrial development. Eco Industrial Town development (EIT).\ Formulated in 1990 as part of the Eastern Seaboard Development program, a government- EIT was implemented with a special focus on being led industrial development program in Rayong more inclusive and engaging a large range of province, Map Ta Phut IE has turned a small fishing stakeholders on the ground. Local IEAT offices town into one of the world’s largest petrochemical encouraged community residents, local experts and production centers. The economic significance of officials from relevant local government agencies Map Ta Phut IE has grown dramatically based on to participate more proactively in the development the number of jobs supported and annual of EIT implementation plans for their own region revenues, which are equivalent to 11% of the through Eco Networks. The IEAT also emphasized national GDP. The Industrial Estate Authority of knowledge-sharing and capacity building activities Thailand (IEAT) under the Ministry of Industry for local stakeholders. The EIT program was firstly (MoIn) is charged with developing and managing piloted in five regions, and then expanded to six Thailand’s 47 IEs. other provinces in 2013. Frequent political instability in the central government affected the Economic success of Map Ta Phut IE came with overall EIT implementation progress. However, its some costs. The surrounding areas became adoption in the national development agenda in severally polluted as a result of industrial emissions 2012 ensured continuity of the program, and 19 and waste, causing various health problems for IEs had completed their EIT development master people in nearby communities. Multiple industrial plan as of 2015. accidents such as leaks of toxic gas and factory explosions amplified fear as well as distrust The design of the EIT program also facilitated its towards IE management authorities and resident adoption by key stakeholders. The program factories among local communities. Tensions integrated Thailand’s Green Industry (GI) and the intensified between civil society and the industrial Eco-Industrial Estate (EIE) programs under the EIT sector in the absence of effective government umbrella, allowing green transition either within intervention. The situation was similar in other IE individual firms or across entire industrial estates, areas, which experienced growing pressure to be even when the macro level EIT implementation more responsible for environmental and social faced difficulty. Both GI and EIT programs offer impacts of their operations. different levels of certification, which made it possible for more applicants to participate. In the A decision by the Thai Central Administrative court GI program, for example, companies can be to suspend a large number of industrial certified for actions ranging from basic development projects in Map Ta Phut IE in 2009 commitment to more comprehensive integration of came at the height of tension between green acts in their value chain. Detailed environmentalists and the industrial sector and certification criteria provided clear guidance for the eventually resulted in a turning point in Thailand’s participation in those programs. industrial policy. MoIn and the IEAT had previously piloted the Eco Industrial Estate program in 2 Case Study | Thailand’s Eco-Industrial Towns There are some potential lessons learned from environmental regulations, and so forth. Also, there Thailand’s EIT program and opportunities for are no apparent coordination and collaboration improvement. First, some have noted that the mechanisms between national and subnational current management structure does not promote government bodies. In addition, the EIT program sufficient coordination among relevant government lacks specific and measurable goals on ministries and agencies. Roles and responsibilities environmental, social, and economic impacts, among ministries are not clear without a making monitoring and evaluation of the program designated supervisory authority, whereas EIT challenging and ambiguous. Linkage with national development requires orchestrated actions by climate change commitments can also be multiple ministries dealing with not only industries strengthened in the program output goals. and economy but also urban development, 3 Global Green Growth Institute Sectors in Focus Industry, Energy, Cities Industrial pollution causing environmental degradation and public health Key Challenges hazards; increasing public antagonism against the industrial sector; need to harmonize industrial growth with public well-being and environmental sustainability Environmental: Thailand’s Eco Industrial Town (EIT) development Impacts programs intend to reduce pollution and other environmental hazards by improving energy and resource efficiency in all manufacturing bases by applying industrial symbiosis principles, and to promote clean and environmentally safe production processes. Social: Heavy pollution from industrial zones has incurred considerable social costs in Thailand including impacts on public health, and increased conflict and tension between local communities and industrial zones. The EIT program is expected to resolve these issues by harmonizing industrial priorities with the well-being of local communities. Economic: Poor environmental records and negative images of industrial zones have been a major barrier for the industrial sector in achieving continuous growth in Thailand. The EIT program helps to rebuild trust between communities and industries, and enables industrial growth that brings positive returns to local economies. Eco-industrial estate, Green industries, Eco-industrial town, Industrial Keywords ecology, Sustainable industrial zone development, Stakeholder engagement Geographic Coverage Kingdom of Thailand 4 Case Study | Thailand’s Eco-Industrial Towns 02 Context After the discovery of natural gas in the Gulf of Figure 1. Location of Map Ta Phut (Fuller 2009) Thailand in 1973, the Royal Thai Government launched a development plan for the eastern seaboard region comprised of Chachoengsao, Chonburi, and Rayong provinces, in line with its new national development strategy for export-led industrialization. The government established the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT), a state enterprise under MoIn, to manage development and operation of industrial parks around the country. The Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate (IE) in Rayong province was opened in 1990 as part of the Eastern Seaboard Development Program. Constructed to be the national hub of heavy industries, it currently hosts more than 60 factories mostly in petrochemicals, along with several coal‑fired power plants and oil refineries (Map Ta Phut Industrial Esate 2014). Being the nation’s largest industrial park and also the world’s eighth largest petrochemical production complex, Map
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Prime Gateway to Asia Exceptional Location Exclusive Opportunity Comprehensive Development
    THE PRIME GATEWAY TO ASIA EXCEPTIONAL LOCATION EXCLUSIVE OPPORTUNITY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT Thailand is at the centre of the Mainland ASEAN, surrounded by 5 the fastest-growing economies such as ASEAN, India, and China Thailand Rest of Mainland ASEAN Rest of ASEAN, China and India 2050 real GDP - projected (2010 USD bn) (%) GDP growth CAGR1 between 2013-2050 RUSSIA GERMANY 6,026 3,086 (1.7%) (1.4%) UK US 5,495 CHINA 37,624 (2.1%) JAPAN (2.4%) 40,894 7,221 FRANCE (4.7%) (0.7%) 4,393 INDIA (1.3%) 17,503 ASEAN (6.0%) 10,507 (4.3%) BRAZIL 6,338 (2.7%) 40% of the global GDP in 2035 will come from ASEAN, China and India SOURCE: IHS, Global Insights EEC as Central Hub for Seamless Connectivity & Logistics 6 8 AVIATION HUB Eastern Airport City to Eastern Aerotropolis 10 แนวทางการขยายตัวPOTENTIAL EXPANSION 1. Tourism and livable smart city 1.1 Airport - Sattahip Bangsaray Jomtian Pattaya Sriracha 1.2 Airport - Banchang-Map Ta Phut-Rayong - Samed 2. Expansion of business, targeted industries and services 2.1 Airport – Highway 331 Corridor ( Toward Sriracha Ban Bueng) 2.2 Airport - Map Ta Phut Industrial estate - High way 331 and high way 36 CITY DEVELOPMENT ▪ First 5 year : within 10 km. around the airport Sattahip Banchang Bangsaray Jomtian ▪ 5 to 10 years : within 30 km. around the airport From Pattaya to Rayong ▪ 10 to 15 years : within 60 km. around the airport 11 AREA CONNECTIVITY INNER AEROTROPOLIS • 10 km. around the airport (Approximately 140,000 Rai) Sattahip Banchang (In the centre) MIDDLE AEROTROPOLIS • 30 km.
    [Show full text]
  • (Unofficial Translation) Order of the Centre for the Administration of the Situation Due to the Outbreak of the Communicable Disease Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) No
    (Unofficial Translation) Order of the Centre for the Administration of the Situation due to the Outbreak of the Communicable Disease Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) No. 1/2564 Re : COVID-19 Zoning Areas Categorised as Maximum COVID-19 Control Zones based on Regulations Issued under Section 9 of the Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations B.E. 2548 (2005) ------------------------------------ Pursuant to the Declaration of an Emergency Situation in all areas of the Kingdom of Thailand as from 26 March B.E. 2563 (2020) and the subsequent 8th extension of the duration of the enforcement of the Declaration of an Emergency Situation until 15 January B.E. 2564 (2021); In order to efficiently manage and prepare the prevention of a new wave of outbreak of the communicable disease Coronavirus 2019 in accordance with guidelines for the COVID-19 zoning based on Regulations issued under Section 9 of the Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations B.E. 2548 (2005), by virtue of Clause 4 (2) of the Order of the Prime Minister No. 4/2563 on the Appointment of Supervisors, Chief Officials and Competent Officials Responsible for Remedying the Emergency Situation, issued on 25 March B.E. 2563 (2020), and its amendments, the Prime Minister, in the capacity of the Director of the Centre for COVID-19 Situation Administration, with the advice of the Emergency Operation Center for Medical and Public Health Issues and the Centre for COVID-19 Situation Administration of the Ministry of Interior, hereby orders Chief Officials responsible for remedying the emergency situation and competent officials to carry out functions in accordance with the measures under the Regulations, for the COVID-19 zoning areas categorised as maximum control zones according to the list of Provinces attached to this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion No. 15/2015
    1. A/HRC/WGAD/2015 ADVANCE UNEDITED Distr.: General 19 June 2015 VERSION Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-second session, 20-29 April 2015 No.15/2015 (Thailand) Communication addressed to the Government on 24 February 2015 Concerning Mr. Yongyuth Boondee The Government has not replied to the communication The State is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1. The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention was established in resolution 1991/42 of the former Commission on Human Rights, which extended and clarified the Working Group’s mandate in its resolution 1997/50. The Human Rights Council assumed the mandate in its decision 2006/102 and extended it for a three-year period in its resolution 15/18 of 30 September 2010. The mandate was extended for a further three years in resolution 24/7 of 26 September 2013. In accordance with its methods of work (A/HRC/16/47 and Corr.1, annex), the Working Group transmitted the above-mentioned communication to the Government. 2. The Working Group regards deprivation of liberty as arbitrary in the following cases: (a) When it is clearly impossible to invoke any legal basis justifying the deprivation of liberty (as when a person is kept in detention after the completion of his or her sentence or despite an amnesty law applicable to the detainee) (category I); (b) When the deprivation of liberty results from the exercise of the rights or
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Estates and Facilities
    INDUSTRIAL ESTATES AND FACILITIES 31 Year of Industrial Estate Nearest Airport/ Completion Location Seaport Distance (KM) BANGKOK Bang Chan Industrial 60 Moo 14, Seri Thai Rd., Minburi, Suvarnabhumi Estate 5 Bangkok 10510 Airport/ 20 General Industrial Zone 1973 Laem Chabang Port/ 100 Gemopolis Industrial 38 Sukhapiban 2 Soi 31, Dokmai, Suvarnabhumi Estate 1, 3 Pravet, Bangkok 10250 Airport/ 4 General Industrial Zone 1990 I-EA-T Free Zone 2009 Factories for Rent 2006 Lad Krabang Industrial 40 Moo 4, Suvarnabhumi Estate 5 Soi Chalongkrung 31 Rd., Airport/ 10 General Industrial Zone 1979 Lumplatew, Lad Krabang, Bangkok Port/ 50 I-EA-T Free Zone 1989 Bangkok 10520 CENTRAL AND WESTERN REGION AYUTTHAYA Bang Pa-In Industrial 139 Moo 2, Udomsorayuth Rd., Don Meuang Airport/ Estate 2, 3, 4 Klong-Jig, Bang Pa-In, Ayutthaya 26 General Industrial Zone - 13160 Bangkok Port/ 65 I-EA-T Free Zone - Ban-Wa (Hi-Tech) 99 Moo 5, Asia Hwy (Bang Pa-In - Don Meuang Airport/ Industrial Estate 1, 2, 3 Nakorn Sawan), Ban Wa, 36 General Industrial Zone 1993 Bang Pa-In, Ayutthaya 13180 Bangkok Port/ 63 I-EA-T Free Zone 1998 Customs Free Zone 2005 Factories for Rent 2003 32 Industrial Zone/ Selling Price/ Contact Information Available Area Maintenance Fee/ (rai)* Water Fee** Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (I-EA-T) 60 Moo 14, Seri Thai Rd., Minburi, Bangkok 10510 677/ - -/ 1,000/ 18-21 Tel: +66 (0) 2517-0744 Fax: +66 (0) 2517-6965 Website: www.ieat.go.th Email: [email protected] Information as of May 24, 2010 I.G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict in Fishery Resource Utilization: the Case of Light Luring Anchovy Fishery in Thailand
    IIFET 2000 Proceedings Conflict in Fishery Resource Utilization: The Case of Light Luring Anchovy Fishery in Thailand Ruangrai Tokrisna Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand Abstract. In late 1999 Artisanal Fisherman Association in Thailand requested the government to take actions in curbing destructive anchovy fishing gears. They believed that anchovy fishing was the main cause of fishery resource depletion in their fishing grounds. Main anchovy fishing gears were light luring falling net, purse seine, and scoop net. All of them are Juvenile bycatch varied from 1.72 – 30.37% of total catches depending on gear type, vessel size, fishing ground, fishing month, and fishing year. Economic losses of juvenile bycatch were $1 – 331/boat/trip. In Songkhla, the crisis problem area, economic losses from light luring falling net were as high as 0.42 – 7.64 times of the return from anchovy. The losses from light luring anchovy purse seine were 23 – 35% of the return from anchovy. The losses from light luring scoop net varied around 2 – 7%. Anchovy catch values in Thailand was $26 million in 1997. Value added from processing was $65 million, mainly from fish sauce. In spite of low value added, 59% of the catches were processed as boiled-dried/dried anchovy mainly for export. 44% of the anchovy value in the importing country were the trade margins, including tax, in importing country. Fishing cost was 20%. This cost estimation did not include the economic loss from juvenile bycatch. Processing and marketing costs in Thailand amounted to 19%.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Seaboard Report
    Eastern Seaboard Report October 2014 – Prepared by Mark Bowling, Chairman ESB Thailand's bearish automotive market has deterred two Japanese car makers, Mitsubishi Motors Corporation and Nissan Motor, from commencing production of their new eco- car. "Our parent company has not yet approved the exact time frame for production, as the domestic market has experienced weaker growth than was enjoyed in 2012," said Masahiko Ueki, president and chief executive of Mitsubishi Motors (Thailand). "Next year's prospects are unpredictable, as the economy and consumption will take time to recover," he said. Mitsubishi was one of the five companies that applied for Board of Investment (BoI) promotion for the second phase of the eco-car scheme. All eco-car production will be done at Mitsubishi's third plant in Laem Chabang Industrial Estate in Chon Buri province. The government confirmed changes to its high-speed development plan, adding a Bangkok-Rayong route and splitting the Nong Khai-Map Ta Phut route into two — Nong Khai-Nakhon Ratchasima and Nakhon Ratchasima-Bangkok-Map Ta Phut. The Nong Khai- Map Ta Phut route would cover 737 kilometres and cost 393 billion baht, while the Chiang Khong-Phachi route would be 655 km and cost 349 billion. Two high-speed rail routes costing a combined 741 billion baht would link Thailand with southern China. Bang Na-Trat office demand up - With office rents in Bangkok's central business district rising by 15% last year and nearly 6% more so far this year, more companies are considering Bang Na-Trat Road an alternative due to its competitive rents and convenient access to both the CBD and the Eastern Seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand Bangkok-Chonburi Highway Construction Project (2) External Evaluator: Masaru Hirano (Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consul
    Thailand Bangkok-Chonburi Highway Construction Project (2) External Evaluator: Masaru Hirano (Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting) Field Survey: January 2006 1. Project Profile and Japan’s ODA Loan ミャンマー ラオス Myanmar Laos タイ Bangkok バンコク カンボジアCambodia Chonburiチョンブリ プロジェクトサイトProject site Map of project area: Bangkok-Chon Buri, Bangkok-Chon Buri Expressway Thailand 1.1 Background In the Sixth Five-Year National Economic and Social Development Plan (1987-1991), the Thai Government specified promotion of the Eastern Seaboard Development Plan as a priority project constituting a key element in the development of the country’s industrial base. This plan sought the development of the eastern coastal area extending over the three provinces of Chon Buri, Rayong, and Chachoengsao (a 80-200km zone in Bangkok’s southeastern district) as Thailand’s No. 2 industrial belt next to Bangkok with a view to developing export industries and correcting regional disparities, thereby decentralizing economic functions that would contribute to ease over-concentrated situation in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area. In response to this decision, the Ministry of Transport, Department of Highways (DOH) established the Sixth Five-Year Highway Development Plan (1987-1991), in which development of a highway network to support the development of the eastern coastal area was positioned as a top-priority project. To achieve this priority objective, the DOH planned construction of the following three routes: expansion of the highway for transport of goods and materials between Bangkok and the eastern coastal area 1 (projects (1) and (2) below), and construction of a highway linking Thailand’s inland northeastern districts to the coastal area, bypassing highly congested Bangkok (project (3) below).
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Quote the OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE AS
    Preliminary Draft: not for Quote THE OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE AS A CATALYST OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION Matsuo WATANABE Japan Institute of International Affairs 1. INTRODUCTION This chapter is intended to investigate the contribution of infrastructure development financed by official development assistance (ODA) to attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) and formation of industrial agglomeration with reference to the automotive industry in Thailand. Thailand has been one of the major production bases in the ASEAN, and currently there are 700 automotive-related companies. The origin of the industry in Thailand dates back to the 1960s when the country invited foreign manufacturers, mainly Japanese, under the import substitution industrialisation (ISI) strategy. The country subsequently changed to an export-oriented strategy in the beginning of the 1970s afterwards which has led to the remarkable success of industrialisation (including automotive sector) and economic development. The success of Thai automotive industry is represented by the expansion of volume of production and export which has been the largest among ASEAN members. This expansion is enabled by a concentration of investments in the industry (known as ‘agglomeration’), among others, from foreign part suppliers in the Eastern Seaboard (ESB) area. The determinants of FDI have been analysed in number of past literature including FDI to the ASEAN economies in which provision of infrastructure as well as existence of industrial agglomeration have positive impacts on attracting FDI1. 1 For example, Kohama and Urata (2001) stress the importance of host countries’ condition in 1 This study investigates how the agglomeration of automotive industry has taken place in Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 0.08M
    Office of the Board of Investment 555 Vibhavadi-Rangsit Rd., Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand Tel. 0 2553 8111 Fax. 0 2553 8315 http://www.boi.go.th E-mail:[email protected] The Investor Information Services Center Press Release No. 12/2561 (A. 7) Monday 29th January 2018 On Monday 29th January 2018 the Board of Investment has approved 22 projects with details as follows: Project Location/ Products/Services Nationalities No. Company Contact (Promotion Activity) of Ownership 1 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES (Chonburi) Machinery e.g. Brake system Hong Kong GROUP CO., LTD. Nongkham Subdistrict testing machine, wheels Sriracha District alignment machine Chonburi (4.5.3) 2 MR. KEISUKE ISHIHAMA (Bangkok) International trading center Hong Kong Wattana District (7.6) Australian Bangkok 3 POLYMATECH (THAILAND) CO., LTD. (Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya) International trading center Hong Kong Bang Pa-In Industrial Estate (7.6) Klongjig Subdistrict Bang Pa-In District Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya 4 MR. VICTOR YANKOVSKIY (Bangkok) Trade and investment support Russian Wattana District office Canadian Bangkok (7.7) French 5 TAKEDA MORIYASU (THAILAND) (Rayong) Mold, jig, fixture Chinese CO., LTD. Amata City Industrial Estate (4.5.2) Mapyangporn Subdistrict Pluagdang District Rayong Page 1 of 4 Project Location/ Products/Services Nationalities No. Company Contact (Promotion Activity) of Ownership 6 MR. YUSUKE SAITO (Bangkok) International trading center Thai Phrakanong Subdistrict (7.6) Klongtoey District Bangkok 7 105 SOLAR POWER CO., LTD. (Chachoengsao) Electricitiy from Thai Thakham Subdistrict solar rooftop Bangpakong District (7.1.1.2) Chachoengsao 8 CHAKANGRAO STARCH CO., LTD. (Kamphaeng Phet) Electricitiy from Thai 657 m.7 bio gas Pangmaka Subdistrict (7.1.1.2) Khanuworalaksaburi District Kamphaeng Phet 9 TAKEDA MORIYASU (THAILAND) (Rayong) Metal parts for automotive Chinese CO., LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Removed from the Infected Area List Between 17 and 22 March
    Wkly Epldem. Rec.: No. 12 - 23 March 1978 - 88 - Relevé épidern. hebd.: N» 12 - 23 mars 1978 SMALLPOX SURVEILLANCE SURVEILLANCE DE LA VARIOLE Number of smallpox-free weeks worldwide: Nombre de semaines sans cas de variole dans le monde: 21 Last case: Somalia, onset of rash on 26 October 1977. Dernier cas: Somalie, début de l'éruption le 26 octobre 1977. Quatre timbres commémorant l'Eradication mondiale Four stamps marking the Global Eradication of Smallpox de la Variole seront émis le 31 mars 1978 par l'Admi­ will be issued by the UNITED NATIONS POSTAL nistration postale des Nations Unies, Palais des Nations, ADMINISTRATION, Palais des Nations, CH 1211 CH 1211 Genève 10. Ces timbres ainsi que des enve­ Geneva 10, on 31 March 1978. First day covers and loppes premier-jour peuvent être commandés à l'adresse stamps can be ordered from the above address. sus-indiquée. DISEASES SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS — MALADIES SOUMISES AU RÈGLEMENT Notifications Received from 17 to 22 March 1978 — Notifications reçues du 17 au 22 mars 1978 C Cases — Cas ... Figures not yet received — Chiffies non encore disponibles D Deaths — Décès i Imported cases — Cas importés P Port t Revised figures — Chiffres révisés A Airport — Aéroport s Suspect cases — Cas suspects PLAGUE — PESTE C ü 1 The total number of cases and deaths reported fbr MALAWI 5-H .ni each country occurred in infected areas already pub. Asia — Asie hshed or in newly infected areas (see below) / Tout 7 0 les cas et décès notifiés pour chaque pays se sont produits C D dans des zones infectées déjà signalées ou dans des BURMA — BIRMANIE 5-1 LUI Asia — Asie zones nouvellement infectées (voir ci-dessous).
    [Show full text]
  • Update All Clinic Network 05-10-2020
    Update All Clinic Network 05-10-2020 กรงุ เทพมหานคร (Bangkok) No Provider City Province Postcode Tel. Hospital Group Service 1 Bangkok Clinic ( Bangpakok 5) Bang Khun Thian Bangkok 10150 02-8941434-6 IPD & OPD 2 Kluaynamthai Clinic bangchak Bangkok 10250 02-7692000 Ext.6191-2 Kluaynamthai OPD Only 3 Kluaynamthai Clinic Branch Talad-yingcharoen Bangken Bangkok 10220 02-7692000 Ext.6161-2 Kluaynamthai OPD Only 4 Petchakaseb-Bangkae Hospital Bangkhae Bangkok 10160 02-8011199 IPD & OPD 5 Bangpakok 2 Bangkuntean Bangkok 10150 02-8990130-9 IPD & OPD 6 PAOLO MEDICAL CLINIC Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 02-617-6474 PAOLO KASET (MAYO) OPD Only 7 PAOLO MEDICAL CLINIC RASATOWER BRANCH Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 02-937-1213 PAOLO KASET (MAYO) OPD Only 8 PAOLO MEDICAL CLINIC TMB HEADQUARTER BRANCH Chom phon Bangkok 10900 02-2737884 PAOLO KASET (MAYO) OPD Only 9 Kluaynamthai Clinic Branch huai khwang huai khwang Bangkok 10130 02-7692000 Ext.6121-2 Kluaynamthai OPD Only 10 Kluaynamthai Clinic Branch Community 70 Klong Toey Bangkok 10110 02-7692000 Ext.6170,6171 Kluaynamthai OPD Only 11 Kluaynamthai Clinic Branch Thungsonghong Lak Si Bangkok 10210 02-7692000 Ext.6141-2 Kluaynamthai OPD Only 12 Clinic Chularat 8 Latkrabang Bangkok 10520 02-3267993-4 , 02-3267104 Chularat IPD & OPD 13 Clinic Nawamin 3 Latkrabang Bangkok 10520 02-7936273-4 Nawamin OPD Only PAOLO MEDICAL CLINIC CHAMCHURI SQUARE 14 Pathumwan Bangkok 10330 02-118-2877 PAOLO KASET (MAYO) OPD Only BRANCH 15 Kluaynamthai Clinic Branch Sukhumvit 56 Prakanong Bangkok 10250 02-7692000 Ext.6156-8 Kluaynamthai
    [Show full text]
  • A Maternal Short Course of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Infant Vaccine to Prevent Mother-To-Child Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus
    Study Title: Antiviral prophylaxis and infant vaccination to prevent perinatal hepatitis B infection, version 1.0 dated 21 August 2017 Protocol A Maternal Short Course of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Infant Vaccine to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus Short title: Antiviral prophylaxis and infant vaccination to prevent perinatal hepatitis B infection Version 1.0 August 21 , 2017 Study Coordination Center: PHPT (Chiang Mai University - Institut de recherche pour Ie development Collaboration) 110 Intawaroros Rd. T. Sripoom, Muang OJ. Chiang Mai 50200 , Thailand ') , O! C:?.:' r '\ Telephone: +66 5381 9125 (up to 29) 2 1 ~ . O . ~ 2 r, 6 0 Fax: +66 53252253, +66 5381 9130 , I ..J E-mail: gon [email protected] t) · :; m :i 1J n 1.j ~lV 1i H l1 f1l 1 1 ~tJ hnJ .lI ~ tJ (~ll ,rlH~~;.r"JlFn" ~" ...x-e- -, •.,- -j ~ ' r " ':C ' ~ " lJ ~ :" • .r-« I J "J ~ " " 'it}JrJ (lYflL , Study Title: Antiviral prophylaxis and infant vaccination to prevent perinatal hepatitis 8 infection, version 1.0 dated 21 August 2017 Table of Contents 1. Study Title 4 2. Protocol team and investigators' names and contact information .4 3. Project Summary 10 4. Background information 12 4.1 Background 12 4.2 Study Rationale 14 5. Study specific objectives 15 5.1 Study objectives 15 5.2 Study Design 16 6. Study sites and duration of the study 17 6.1 Study sites 17 6.2 Duration of the study 18 7. Workplan 19 7.1 Study population 19 7.1.1 Eligibility 19 7.1.2 Inclusion criteria 19 7.1.3 Exclusion criteria 19 7.1.4 Discontinuation criteria 19 7.2 Implementation, data collection, and monitoring procedures 20 7.2.1 Follow-up and study procedures 20 7.2.2 Laboratory assessments 22 7.2.3 Data collection 22 7.2.4 Reporting 22 7.2.5 Study implementation onsite monitoring 23 7.3 Study drugs 23 7.4 Biohazard Containment 23 7.5 Statistical considerations 23 7.5.1 Justifications for the design 23 7.5.2 Endpoints 23 7.5.3 Sample size 24 7.5.4 Analyses for the primary objective 25 7.5.5 Analyses for the secondary objectives/endpoints 25 7.6 Data and Safety Monitoring Board 26 8.
    [Show full text]