Special Release Euro: 10 Years of the Single European Currency in Slovenia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Special Release Euro: 10 Years of the Single European Currency in Slovenia Special Release 23 december 2016 no status Euro: 10 years of the single European currency in Slovenia A decade of euro in Slovenia Ten years ago, on 1 January 2007, Slovenia introduced the euro as the 13th EU Member State. The euro replaced the first monetary currency of our independent state, the Slovenian tolar (SIT), at the exchange rate EUR 1 = SIT 239.64. Steps towards the euro In January 2017 Slovenia will celebrate 10 years of the adoption of the euro. When it became member of the EU, Slovenia also made the commitment to introduce the single European currency and thus to join the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). Prior to the introduction of the euro, Slovenia had to fulfil certain conditions, and these conditions focused on the stability of public finances, prices, interest rates and the exchange rate. Slovenia will mark the tenth anniversary of euro introduction also by issuing a commemorative €2 coin. The central motif on the coin is 10 swallows flying: each of them represents one of the "springs" since the introduction of the euro, while a bird is the symbol of freedom. At the same time, EU will celebrate the fifteenth anniversary of the introduction of euro banknotes and coins. Globally, euro banknotes maintain the same design, but with euro coins one side is common to all coins and the other (national) side holds a design that is specific to each individual EU Member State. Milestones in the history of euro introduction Sources: BS, ECB Published on: http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/News/Index/6414, printed on 28. 9. 2021. 1/4 Euro in figures With the introduction of the euro in 2002, 38.1 billion coins and 7.8 billion banknotes in circulation were worth a total of EUR 233.8 billion. Since then, the quantity has been constantly growing and at the end of 2015 there were over 116.2 billion coins and 18.9 billion banknotes in circulation, worth EUR 1,109.4 billion in total. Prior to the introduction of the new currency, Slovenia asked the European Central Bank (ECB) for 296.3 million pieces of euro coins, worth EUR 103.9 million and weighing 1,465 tonnes, and for 94.5 million pieces of euro banknotes, worth EUR 2.2 billion and weighing 76 tons. Per capita this meant 147 coins and 47 banknotes respectively almost 1,150 euros. As regards banknotes in circulation in the EMU, the most common denomination in terms of volume and value is EUR 50, while among the coins the 1 cent coin prevails in terms of volume and the EUR 2 coin prevails in terms of value. The international role of the euro Today the euro is used by more than 339 million people in the euro area, comprising 19 of 28 EU Member States. In addition, it is the official monetary unit also in six other European countries, i.e. Andorra, San Marino, Vatican City, Monaco, Montenegro, and Kosovo. Published on: http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/News/Index/6414, printed on 28. 9. 2021. 2/4 The countries with the euro in 2015 generated almost 16% of global GDP (gross domestic product). The euro has thus rapidly become the second most important international currency after the US dollar. It is also the second most common currency that is traded on foreign exchange markets: it is used in approximately 33% of all daily transactions in the world. In 2015 over a fifth of foreign currency assets were held in euros. In 2015 the debt ratio in global markets, expressed in the euro, amounted to around 40%. The use of the euro keeps increasing also in view of billing and payment of invoices in international trade. Over 50% of imports and more than 65% of exports of the euro area are accounted for in euros. Euro myths: think again The introduction of the euro in Slovenia definitely contributed to larger price transparency and made easier the comparisons of prices with other countries using the same currency. In the first years after the introduction of the euro this also had an impact on the price rise and inflation. Thus, in 2007 and 2008 Slovenia had the highest inflation in the euro area, although in 2015 inflation turned into a 0.8% deflation. Compared to 2006, the prices in Slovenia in 2015 measured by the harmonized index of consumer prices (HICP), rose on average by 20.2% and in the EMU by 15.2%. An overview of the prices of selected goods and services showed that some prices increased considerably in nine years, e.g. of a cup of coffee in a bar by 48%, of beer by 42% and of a woman’s haircut by 29%. In 2006 a cup of coffee in a bar cost on average 81 cents and in 2015 already EUR 1.20. For the average monthly net salary in 2006 one could buy 955 cups of coffee in a bar, but in 2015 only 844. The introduction of the euro definitely also contributed to the decline in interest rates. The harmonised long- term interest rate for convergence assessment purposes in Slovenia decreased from 4.23% at the beginning of 2007 to 1.61% at the end of 2015. Elimination of the costs due to currency exchange and currency risks, better integration of financial markets and the related easier access to capital and easier handling of international cooperation surely had an effect also on the volume of the Slovenian international trade and investments on the one hand, and travels of the population and the higher number of tourists in Slovenia on the other hand. Compared to 2006, in 2015 Slovenia recorded an increase in the exports of goods (by 41%) and in the imports of goods (by 27%). In the same comparison also the number of overnight stays and arrivals of tourists increased considerably (by 34% and 58%, respectively). In 2015 the average monthly net salary in Slovenia was on average higher by 31% over 2006, and GDP per capita was higher by 19%. The increase in the value of certain indicators was particularly large in the first year and partly in the second year after the introduction of the euro. Published on: http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/News/Index/6414, printed on 28. 9. 2021. 3/4 Did you know that: so far Slovenia has issued eleven commemorative €2 coins; tolar coins can be exchanged in the Bank of Slovenia only until 31 December 2016, while there is no limit on the exchange of tolar banknotes; the inspiration for the euro symbol (€) was the Greek letter epsilon (Є), which is interpreted as a symbol for the first letter of the name of Europe in the Latin alphabet, while the two parallel lines represent stability; the windows and gateways on the front side of the euro banknotes are the symbols of the European spirit of openness and cooperation, and the bridges on the back are the symbol of communication between Europe and the rest of the world; in 2015 the banknotes for EUR 20 and EUR 50 were the most frequently counterfeited; a second series of euro banknotes, called Europe, has been put in circulation, but this series no longer includes the EUR 500 banknote. Author/s: Ema Mišić Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia Litostrojska cesta 54, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Information Centre: phone: +386 1 241 64 04 fax: +386 1 241 53 44 [email protected] www.stat.si/en © Statistični urad Republike Slovenije Use and publication of data is allowed provided the source is acknowledged. Published on: http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/News/Index/6414, printed on 28. 9. 2021. 4/4.
Recommended publications
  • Small Economies in the Euro Area
    CONTENTS EDITORIAL Mitja Gaspari: Jumping the Last Hurdle Towards the Final Stage of Convergence 1 MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK OF SMALL OPEN ECONOMY Willem H. Buiter and Anne C. Sibert: When Should the New Central European Members Join the Eurozone? 5 George Kopits: Policy Scenarios for Adopting the Euro 12 Dejan Krušec: Common Monetary Policy and Small Open Economies 17 Lars Calmfors: The Revised Stability and Growth Pact – A Critical Assessment 22 Fabio Mucci and Debora Revoltella: Banking Systems in the New EU Members and Acceding Countries 27 Mathilde Maurel: The Political Business Cycles in the EU Enlarged 38 FINANCIAL MARKETS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN EMU Kevin R. James: Small Countries, Big Markets: Achieving Financial Stability in Small Sophisticated Economies 43 Garry J. Schinasi and Pedro Gustavo Teixeira: Financial Crisis Management in the European Single Financial Market 47 Franjo Štiblar: Consolidations and Diversifications in Financial Sector 56 Fabrizio Coricelli: Financial Deepening and Financial Integration of New EU Countries 70 THE CASE OF SLOVENIA Ivan Ribnikar: Slovenian »Transition« and Monetary Policy 75 Igor Masten: Expected Stabilization Effects of Euro Adoption on Slovenian Economy 83 Velimir Bole: Fiscal Policy in Slovenia after Entering Euro – New Goals and Soundness? 87 Božo Jašovič and Borut Repanšek: Application of the Balance Sheet Approach to Slovenia 95 STATISTICAL APPENDIX Matjaž Noč: Selected Macroeconomic and Financial Indicators 105 EDITORIAL Jumping the Last Hurdle Towards the Final Stage of Convergence Mitja Gaspari * n 1 January 2007, Slovenia will join the 12 current members of the euro area and adopt the single European currency. This is a historic moment for Slovenia and for euro area enlargement.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union
    EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 27 June 2004 COMMUNIQUE At the request of the Slovenian authorities, the ministers of the euro area Member States of the European Union, the President of the European Central Bank and the ministers and the central bank governors of Denmark and Slovenia have decided, by mutual agreement, following a common procedure involving the European Commission and after consultation of the Economic and Financial Committee, to include the Slovenian tolar in the Exchange Rate Mechanism II (ERM II). The central rate of the Slovenian tolar is set at 1 euro = 239.640 tolar. The standard fluctuation band of plus or minus 15 percent will be observed around the central rate of the tolar. The agreement on participation of the tolar in ERM II is based on a firm commitment by the Slovenian authorities to continue to take the necessary measures to lower inflation in a sustainable way: these include most notably measures aimed at further liberalising administered prices and advancing further with de-indexation, in particular of the wage and certain social transfer setting mechanisms. Continued vigilance will be needed so that domestic cost developments, in particular wages, are in line with productivity growth. The authorities, together with the responsible EU bodies, will closely monitor macroeconomic developments. Fiscal policy will have to play a central role in controlling demand-induced inflationary pressures and financial supervision will assist in containing domestic credit growth. Structural reforms aimed at further enhancing the economy’s flexibility and adaptability will be implemented in a timely fashion so as to strengthen domestic adjustment mechanisms and to maintain the overall competitiveness of the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Economic Trends
    MONET MONTENEGRO ECONOMIC TRENDS April 2003 ABOUT ISSP ABOUT CEPS The Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognoses CEPS was established in 1983. It performs (ISSP), established by Professor Vukotic in independent analyses and critiques on European 1999, is the first independent economic institute economic policy and politics, as well as on in Montenegro. USAID assisted in this process European institutions and security. It and continues to support the work of the disseminates its findings through a regular flow Institute. ISSP has a wide network of associates of publications, public events and electronic both in Montenegro (about 150) and abroad. commentaries. ISSP is a member of the Balkan Network, the CEPS is an independent membership-driven Global Development Network established by the organization with more than 100 corporate World Bank and the European Integration members and a large number of central banks, Network. ISSP cooperates with ICER (Torino), diplomatic missions and international business WIIW (Vienna), CEPS (Brussels) and organizations in its constituency. Chesapeake Associates (Washington). ABOUT MONET The Institute’s mission is "to provide research that will contribute to Montenegro’s economic MONET (www.monetonline.org) is the result of transformation and to change the current the joint work of ISSP in Podgorica and CEPS in mindset, as well as to train today’s young people Belgium. It is financed by the grant from the how to function successfully in the new European Agency for Reconstruction. environment." MONET team
    [Show full text]
  • Central Bank Sterilization Policy: the Experiences of Slovenia and Lessons for Countries in Southeastern Europe1
    √ Workshops Proceedings of OeNB Workshops Any Lessons for Southeastern Europe? Lessons for Any Emerging Markets: Any Lessons for Southeastern Europe? Emerging Markets: Emerging March 5 and 6, 2007 12 No. Workshops N0. N0. Workshops 12 Stability and Security. Central Bank Sterilization Policy: The Experiences of Slovenia and Lessons for 1 Countries in Southeastern Europe Darko Bohnec Banka Slovenije Marko Košak University of Ljubljana 1. Introduction It is well known that countries in the Southeastern European (SEE) region have experienced a substantial and gradually intensified inflow of foreign capital during the entire period of economic transition (Markievicz, 2006). Central banks in those countries had to adapt their monetary policy operations and exchange rate regimes to the changing conditions. Especially in those countries that responded by implementing a managed floating exchange rate regime, central banks had to find viable solutions in order to support the “consistency triangle” policy framework (Bofinger and Wollmershaeuser, 2001). Advocates of the “consistency triangle” policy framework claim that simultaneous determination of the optimum interest rate level and the optimum exchange rate path is possible. Effective sterilization procedures need to be activated by the central bank in order for the policy framework to be operational. The experiences of some developing countries in the 1990s confirm the viability of sterilization as a key element of the central bank’s monetary policy in circumstances of intensified inflow of foreign capital (Lee, 1996). However, certain limitations to this kind of strategy exist, which in most cases central banks need to address properly by developing alternative procedures and instruments instead of classical open-market operations.
    [Show full text]
  • WM/Refinitiv Closing Spot Rates
    The WM/Refinitiv Closing Spot Rates The WM/Refinitiv Closing Exchange Rates are available on Eikon via monitor pages or RICs. To access the index page, type WMRSPOT01 and <Return> For access to the RICs, please use the following generic codes :- USDxxxFIXz=WM Use M for mid rate or omit for bid / ask rates Use USD, EUR, GBP or CHF xxx can be any of the following currencies :- Albania Lek ALL Austrian Schilling ATS Belarus Ruble BYN Belgian Franc BEF Bosnia Herzegovina Mark BAM Bulgarian Lev BGN Croatian Kuna HRK Cyprus Pound CYP Czech Koruna CZK Danish Krone DKK Estonian Kroon EEK Ecu XEU Euro EUR Finnish Markka FIM French Franc FRF Deutsche Mark DEM Greek Drachma GRD Hungarian Forint HUF Iceland Krona ISK Irish Punt IEP Italian Lira ITL Latvian Lat LVL Lithuanian Litas LTL Luxembourg Franc LUF Macedonia Denar MKD Maltese Lira MTL Moldova Leu MDL Dutch Guilder NLG Norwegian Krone NOK Polish Zloty PLN Portugese Escudo PTE Romanian Leu RON Russian Rouble RUB Slovakian Koruna SKK Slovenian Tolar SIT Spanish Peseta ESP Sterling GBP Swedish Krona SEK Swiss Franc CHF New Turkish Lira TRY Ukraine Hryvnia UAH Serbian Dinar RSD Special Drawing Rights XDR Algerian Dinar DZD Angola Kwanza AOA Bahrain Dinar BHD Botswana Pula BWP Burundi Franc BIF Central African Franc XAF Comoros Franc KMF Congo Democratic Rep. Franc CDF Cote D’Ivorie Franc XOF Egyptian Pound EGP Ethiopia Birr ETB Gambian Dalasi GMD Ghana Cedi GHS Guinea Franc GNF Israeli Shekel ILS Jordanian Dinar JOD Kenyan Schilling KES Kuwaiti Dinar KWD Lebanese Pound LBP Lesotho Loti LSL Malagasy
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro 2020
    MONTENEGRO 2020 1 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Doing Business in Montenegro ___________________________________________________4 Market Overview ________________________________________________________________4 Market Challenges ______________________________________________________________4 Market Overview ________________________________________________________________5 Market Entry Strategy ___________________________________________________________6 Leading Sectors for U.S. Exports and Investment __________________________ 7 Energy ________________________________________________________________________7 Tourism _______________________________________________________________________9 Medical Equipment _____________________________________________________________10 Construction __________________________________________________________________11 Customs, Regulations and Standards ___________________________________ 12 Trade Barriers _________________________________________________________________12 Import Tariffs __________________________________________________________________12 Import Requirements and Documentation _________________________________________13 Labeling and Marking Requirements ______________________________________________13 U.S. Export Controls ___________________________________________________________13 Temporary Entry _______________________________________________________________14 Prohibited and Restricted Imports ________________________________________________14 Customs Regulations___________________________________________________________14
    [Show full text]
  • European Economy. Convergence Report 2004
    European Economy Convergence Report 2004 – Technical annex A Commission services working paper SEC(2004)1268 PROVISIONAL LAYOUT The definitive version will be published as European Economy No 6/2004 http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/convergencereports2004_en.htm Acknowledgements This paper was prepared in the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs under the supervision of Klaus Regling, Director-General, and Antonio J. Cabral, Deputy Director-General. The main contributors to the paper were Johan Baras, Sean Berrigan, Carsten Brzeski, Adriaan Dierx, Christine Gerstberger, Alexandr Hobza, Fabienne Ilzkovitz, Filip Keereman, Paul Kutos, Baudouin Lamine, João Nogueira Martins, Moises Orellana Pena, Lucio R. Pench, Jiri Plecity, Stéphanie Riso, Delphine Sallard, Charlotte Van Hooydonk, Johan Verhaeven and Joachim Wadefjord. Country-specific contributions were provided by Georg Busch, Juan Ramon Calaf Sole, Nathalie Darnaut, Per Eckefeldt, Luis Fau Sebastian, Barbara Kauffmann, Filip Keereman, Viktoria Kovacs, Carlos Martinez Mongay, Marek Mora, Willem Noë, Mateja Peternelj, José Luis Robledo Fraga, Agnieszka Skuratowicz, Siegfried Steinlein, Kristine Vlagsma, Helga Vogelmann and Ralph Wilkinson. Charlotte Van Hooydonk edited the paper. Statistical and technical assistance was provided by Vittorio Gargaro, Tony Tallon and André Verbanck. Contents 1. Introduction and overview.................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Council and Commission Decision of 29 March 2010 on the Conclusion Of
    29.4.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 108/1 II (Non-legislative acts) INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS COUNCIL AND COMMISSION DECISION of 29 March 2010 on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part (2010/224/EU, Euratom) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN (3) As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of COMMISSION, Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community. Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 217 in conjunction with (4) The Agreement should be approved, Article 218(6)(a) and (8) thereof, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof, Article 1 Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, The Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the Euro­ Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament, pean Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part, the Annexes and Protocols annexed thereto, as well as the joint declarations and Having regard to the approval of the Council granted pursuant to the declaration by the Community attached to the Final Act, are Article 101 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic hereby approved on behalf of the European Union and the Euro­ Energy Community, pean Atomic Energy Community.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Expansion: Examining the Accession of Montenegro
    S. HRG. 114–712 NATO EXPANSION: EXAMINING THE ACCESSION OF MONTENEGRO HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gpo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–080 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 12:46 Nov 17, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\2016 HEARINGS -- WORKING\091416-QQ\27-080.T FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, TENNESSEE, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida BARBARA BOXER, California RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JEFF FLAKE, Arizona JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire CORY GARDNER, Colorado CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware DAVID PERDUE, Georgia TOM UDALL, New Mexico JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut RAND PAUL, Kentucky TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director ROB STRAYER, Majority Chief Counsel MARGARET TAYLOR, Minority Chief Counsel JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 12:46 Nov 17, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\2016 HEARINGS -- WORKING\091416-QQ\27-080.T FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER CONTENTS Page Johnson, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Rate of the Slovenian Tolar in the Context of Slovenia's Inclusion in the Eu and in the Emu
    EXCHANGE RATE OF THE SLOVENIAN TOLAR IN THE CONTEXT OF SLOVENIA'S INCLUSION IN THE EU AND IN THE EMU 9ODGLPLU /DYUDþ WORKING PAPER No. 1, 1999 EXCHANGE RATE OF THE SLOVENIAN TOLAR IN THE CONTEXT OF SLOVENIA'S INCLUSION IN THE EU AND IN THE EMU 9ODGLPLU /DYUDþ WORKING PAPER No. 1, 1999 E-mail address of the author: [email protected] Editor of the WP series: Peter Stanovnik © 1999 Inštitut za ekonomska raziskovanja This paper is also available on Internet home page: http//www.ier.si Ljubljana, January 1999 2 Introduction Creation of the European economic and monetary union (EMU) and successive introduction of the European single currency, the euro, is a historic event, which will lead to fundamental changes in the EU economies. These changes will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the economies of the Central European transition countries, candidates for a full membership in the EU, similarly as the preparations of the EU countries for the EMU and their efforts to meet the Maastricht convergence criteria have already affected the Central European economies. Policy-makers and other decision-makers at various levels (enterprises, banks, government bodies) will have to adapt to the changing environment, first by adjusting to the irrevocably fixed exchange rates among the EU currencies participating in the EMU and then by adjusting to the introduction of the euro and to the elimination of national currencies in the euro zone. This paper, however, does not concentrate on these otherwise important issues of the impact of the EMU on the Central European countries. It focuses primarily on the most direct questions related to the EMU for these countries - why, how and when Slovenia and the other Central European EU candidate countries will be ready to join the EMU.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2004
    MONET MONTENEGRO ECONOMIC TRENDS February 2004 ABOUT ISSP ABOUT CEPS The Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognoses CEPS was established in 1983. It performs (ISSP), established by Professor Vukotic in independent analyses and critiques on European 1999, is the first independent economic institute economic policy and politics, as well as on in Montenegro. USAID assisted in this process European institutions and security. It and continues to support the work of the disseminates its findings through a regular flow Institute. ISSP has a wide network of associates of publications, public events and electronic both in Montenegro (about 150) and abroad. commentaries. ISSP is a member of the Balkan Network, the Global Development Network established by the CEPS is an independent membership-driven World Bank and the European Integration organization with more than 100 corporate Network. ISSP cooperates with ICER (Torino), members and a large number of central banks, WIIW (Vienna), CEPS (Brussels) and diplomatic missions and international business Chesapeake Associates (Washington). organizations in its constituency. The Institute’s mission is "to provide research ABOUT MONET that will contribute to Montenegro’s economic transformation and to change the current MONET (www.isspm.org) is the result of the mindset, as well as to train today’s young people joint work of ISSP in Podgorica and CEPS in how to function successfully in the new Belgium. It is financed by the grant from the environment." European Agency for Reconstruction. Major projects: MONET team o Macroeconomic reform in Montenegro a) Privatization -ISSP- b) Monetary Reform c) Capital Markets Development ISSP team leaders: d) Fiscal Reform Professor Veselin Vukotic Petar Ivanovic e) Reform of the Pension System f) Introduction of the SNA system Researchers: o Macroeconomic indicators in Jadranka Kaludjerovic, Montenegro Maja Bacovic, o Economic education Milorad Katnic, Nina Labovic, President: Ana Krsmanovic, Professor Veselin Vukotic, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • World View Foreign Currency Kit #4 Inventory
    World View Foreign Currency Inventory Kit #4 Dear Educator: Thank you for your interest in the World View Foreign Currency Kit project. Before returning to World View, please use this form to verify that the kit is complete. COIN/ # COUNTRY/ REGION CURRENCY DENOMINATION BILL? TEACHER WORLD VIEW 9 Armenia Dram 200 dram bill 25 Botswana Pula 1 thebe coin 26 Brazil Real/ Centavo 2 real bill 26 Brazil Real/ Centavo 5 real bill 26 Brazil Real/ Centavo 1 real x 3 coin 26 Brazil Real/ Centavo 50 centavos x 2 coin 26 Brazil Real/ Centavo 10 centavos x 2 coin 26 Brazil Real/ Centavo 5 centavos coin 38 Chile Peso 10 pesos coin 38 Chile Peso 100 pesos coin 39 China Renminbi 1 yuan bill 39 China Renminbi 5 yuan bill 39 China Yuan/ Jiao 1 yi jiao x 7 coin 39 China Yuan/ Jiao 1 yi yuan x 6 coin 39 China Yuan/ Jiao 5 wu jiao x 2 coin 44 Costa Rica Colones 1000 colones bill 44 Costa Rica Colones 100 colones coin 44 Costa Rica Colones 25 colones coin 44 Costa Rica Colones 10 colones coin 50 Denmark Kroner 5 kroner coin 50 Denmark Kroner 20 kroner coin 200 Falkland Islands Falkland Islands Pound 5 pence x 3 coin 200 Falkland Islands Falkland Islands Pound 1 pence x 4 coin 64 Finland Markka 10 penni coin 64 Finland Markka 1 markka coin World View UNC at Chapel Hill 01/2017 World View Foreign Currency Inventory Kit #4 69 Germany Deutsche Mark 10 Deutsche mark bill 80 Hungary Forint 20 forint coin 80 Hungary Forint 100 forint coin 80 Hungary Forint 5 forint coin 92 Japan Yen 1 yen x 2 coin 92 Japan Yen 10 yen coin 92 Japan Yen 100 yen x 2 coin 92 Japan Yen
    [Show full text]