DOCSLIB.ORG

San Francisco Office Market Update CCIM Northern California Chapter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CCIM Northern California Chapter San Francisco Broker Investment and Leasing Forum October 9, 2014 Wells Fargo Bank Penthouse San Francisco Office Market Update Market Knowledge. Insight on Trends. Expert Forecasts. Garrick Brown Vice President, Research Western United States [email protected] Cranes, Cranes Everywhere…. Salesforce Tower 222 2nd Street 415 Mission Street 452K SF 1.4 Million SF 2K Available 700K Available 07/2015 01/2017 Transbay Transit Center 350 Mission Street 181 Fremont Street 451K SF 416K SF 6K Available 416K SF Available 01/2015 06/2016 Cranes, Cranes Everywhere…. Salesforce Tower 222 2nd Street 415 Mission Street 452K SF 1.4 Million SF 2K Available 700K Available 07/2015 01/2017 Transbay Transit Center 350 Mission Street 181 Fremont Street 451K SF 416K SF 6K Available 416K SF Available 01/2015 06/2016 Cranes, Cranes Everywhere…. 535 Mission Street 329 Brannan Street 307K SF 180K SF 201K Available 0K Available Pending… 08/2015 Kaiser SF Public Safety Building 1600 Owens Street 1351 3rd Street 182K SF 151K SF -K SF Available 0K Available 10/2015 12/2014 Cranes, Cranes Everywhere…. 535 Mission Street 329 Brannan Street 307K SF 180K SF 201K Available 0K Available Pending… 08/2015 Kaiser SF Public Safety Building 1600 Owens Street 1351 3rd Street 182K SF 151K SF -K SF Available 0K Available 10/2015 12/2014 Cranes, Cranes Everywhere…. 345 Lansing 320 Units 06/2015 1000 Channel St 273 Units 09/2015 260 5th St 325 Octavia St 176 Units 182 Units 10/2015 02/2015 701 China Basin 188 Units 04/2015 Can the Market Absorb it All? 4.8 Million SF of Office Space Now Under Construction 50% Already Pre-Leased 30% in Negotiation Still 18 Months from Peak Deliveries San Francisco Office Market Net Absorption, New Construction (SF) & Vacancy Trend 1,500,000 17% 15% 1,000,000 13% 500,000 11% 0 9% (500,000) 7% 7.1% (1,000,000) Vacancy now at lowest level since Q2 2000! 5% Net Absorption New Construction Vacancy Source: Cassidy Turley Research Is Demand Cooling? Net Absorption Trend 1,600,000 Annual Occupancy Growth 17% 1,400,000 1,200,000 2010: 1.1 M SF 15% 1,000,000 2011: 4.2M SF 13% 800,000 2012: 2.1 M SF 600,000 2013: 566K SF 11% 400,000 2014YTD: 2.4M SF 200,000 9% 0 (200,000) 7% (400,000) (600,000) 5% Net Absorption New Construction Source: Cassidy Turley Research Demand Still Hot Demand Trends We are tracking 17.1 million SF of Office & R&D requirements throughout Bay Area. This number is up 10% from last year. We are tracking 3.9 million SF of current space user requirements in San Francisco. San Francisco Office Market Vacancy & Average Asking Rate (FSG) Trend 25% $80.00 $70.94 $56.89 $70.00 20% $60.00 15% $50.00 $40.00 10% $31.67 $30.00 $24.99 $20.00 5% $10.00 0% $0.00 Asking Rents up 80% from recession lows. Vacancy Avg. Asking (FSG) Source: Cassidy Turley Research Bay Area Space User Requirements By Industry Total Total SF Average Size Requirements Software/Internet 119 5,975,611 50,215 Professional Services 140 3,533,700 25,241 Consumer Products/Services 58 1,139,500 19,647 Hardware/Tech Tech Users Account23 1,133,500 for 49,283 Medical/Health Care 32 1,081,300 33,791 Government/EducationRoughly 70% of21 All805,000 38,333 Communications/MediaCurrent Demand21 604,000 28,762 Clean Technology 7 398,000 56,857 Life Science 16 361,500 22,594 Non Profit 16 205,000 12,813 Aerospace/Defense 2 90,000 45,000 Undisclosed 76 1,796,500 23,638 Total 532 17,128,611 32,197 San Francisco Office Market Net Absorption, New Construction (SF) & Vacancy Trend 3,000,000 24% Dot.com Dot. Great Tech 2.0 2,000,000 Bomb Recession Boom 20% 1,000,000 16% 0 12% (1,000,000) 8% (2,000,000) 4% (3,000,000) (4,000,000) 0% S&L Rollercoaster Net Absorption New Construction Vacancy Source: Cassidy Turley Research Does Tech Boom 2.0 Have Staying Power? Uh Yeah… Tech: San Francisco Clustering The Bigger Picture The “Flat World” View “Thanks to technology and competition in telecoms, distance will soon be no object...” – The Economist Magazine, 1995 “The wireless revolution is ending the dictatorship of place in a more profound way…” –The Economist Magazine, 1999 Technology is making place irrelevant… isn’t it? Place Still Matters… Immensely “There are many advantages that children can enter this world with—including intelligence, physical power and agility, good looks and caring parents. It also matters where you live.” – Edward Leamer, Economist, UCLA Anderson School of Management Globalization/Tech Revolution is not Either/Or We Are Seeing Both Simultaneously… • Globalization/Flat World • Geographic spread of routine economic functions – Manufacturing – Service work – Support work (call centers, etc.) • Concentration • Concentration of higher-level economic activities – Innovation/tech – Design – Finance – Media Economic Output is Concentrating… Not Spreading… Concentrated Populations = Economic Output Economic Output is Concentrating… Not Spreading… These Areas Account for 80% of USA Output Mega-Region Population (Millions) Economic Output (Billions) # of Metros Bos-Wash 56.5 $3,751 41 Chi-Pitts 41.8 $2,314 60 Char-lanta 22.0 $1,149 45 So-Cal 21.8 $1,204 5 So-Flo 16.9 $765 15 Tor-Buff-Chester 16.4 $593 22 Nor-Cal 14.5 $909 17 Dal-Aus 11.9 $723 8 Hou-Orleans 10.8 $755 12 Cascadia 9.7 $593 11 Phoenix-Tucson 5.3 $256 2 Denver-Boulder 4.2 $256 5 Concentration: Pre-Requisite to Innovation Young workforces need to be corralled Clustering brings Productivity advantages Economies of scale Knowledge spillover Innovation, economic growth and prosperity continue to occur in places that attract a critical mass of top creative talent Globalization increases the returns on innovation… Fast rollouts of innovative products and services Increases lure of innovation centers for planet’s best and brightest Why Place Matters • Despite all the hype over globalization, place is actually more important in the global economy than ever before. • Places are growing more diverse and specialized— from their economic makeup and job market to the quality of life they provide and the kinds of people who live in them. • We live in a highly mobile society, giving most of us more say over where we live. Global IPO Trends 2013 $137 Billion Globally in 2013 Europe: $26.9 Billion Asia Pacific: $44.9 Billion North America: $54.9 Billion Middle East & Africa: $1.4 Billion Latin America: $12.1 Billion Global Total: $140.2 Billion North America Accounted for 39% of all Activity Source: Renaissance Capital/ Cassidy Turley Research IPOs Driving Growth Significant Bay Area IPOs (Public) US IPO Trends 2013 US IPO Historical Trends In 2013, the US IPO market posted its strongest showing in over a decade. Proceeds by Sector in 2013 US Total Bay Area Total As of midyear 2014, Sector # $(B) % of $ # $(B) % of $ Energy 22 $10.7 19% 2 $0.43 8% the US IPO market Financial 45 $10.2 19% 1 $0.23 4% Health Care 54 $8.6 16% 8 $0.79 15% was on pace to Consumer 19 $8.3 15% 3 $0.4 8% Technology 45 $7.9 14% 15 $3.45 65% surpass 2013 totals Capital Goods 14 $3.7 7% 0 $0.0 0% Transportation 7 $1.8 3% 0 $0.0 0% by at least 15%. Materials 9 $1.5 3% 0 $0.0 0% Business Services 3 $1.4 3% 0 $0.0 0% Communications 4 $0.8 1% 0 $0.0 0% Utilities 0 $0.0 0% 0 $0.0 0% Source: Renaissance Capital/ Cassidy Turley Research Total 222 $54.9 29 $5.31 Source: Renaissance Capital, SalesGenie, Cassidy Turley Research © Cassidy Turley 2014 Bay Area IPO Trends 2013 Proceeds by Sector (% of $) in 2013 The San Francisco Bay Area has emerged as the clear leader, nationally and globally, in terms of technology-related IPOs, accounting for 65% of all US activity last year. Source: Renaissance Capital/ Cassidy Turley Research Source: Renaissance Capital, SalesGenie, Cassidy Turley Research © Cassidy Turley 2014 Bay Area IPO Trends 2014 Bay Area IPOs in 2014 (Midyear 2014) Bay Area IPO Locations YTD 2014 Company Industry IPO Status Target ($M) GoPro Technology Jun 2014 $427.0M Business TriNet Mar 2014 $240.0M Svcs Arista Networks Technology Jun 2014 $226.0M A-10 Networks Technology Mar 2014 $188.0M Castlight Health Health Care Mar 2014 $178.0M Coupons.Com Technology Mar 2014 $168.0M Versartis Health Care Mar 2014 $126.0M Ultragenyx Health Care Jan 2014 $121.0M Pharmaceuticals MobileIron Technology Jun 2014 $100.0M ZenDesk Technology Jun 2014 $100.0M Revance Health Care Jan 2014 $86.3M Therapeutics Aerohive Networks Technology Mar 2014 $75.0M Achaeogen Health Care Mar 2014 $72.0M Five9 Technology Apr 2014 $70.0M Ardelyx Health Care Jun 2014 $60.0M Corium International Health Care Apr 2014 $52.0M Adamas Health Care Apr 2014 $48.0M Pharmaceuticals Energous Technology Mar 2014 $24.0M Sysorex Global Technology Apr 2014 $20.0M Enterprises YTD 2014 IPOs: 20 | $2,469M Source: Renaissance Capital, SalesGenie, Cassidy Turley Research © Cassidy Turley 2014 Bay Area IPOs Still Strong in 2014 Proceeds by Sector through YTD 2014 (Midyear 2014) US Total Bay Area Total Sector # $(B) % of $ # $(B) % of $ Energy 17 $7.5 24% 0 $0.0 0% Financial 16 $6.9 22% 0 $0.0 0% Technology 37 $6.6 21% 10 $1.4 66% Health Care 52 $3.6 12% 9 $0.8 34% Business Services 5 $2.5 8% 1 $0.2 0% Consumer 9 $2.2 7% 0 $0.0 0% Capital Goods 7 $1.1 3% 0 $0.0 0% Transportation 3 $0.6 2% 0 $0.0 0% Materials 1 $0.2 1% 0 $0.0 0% Communications 0 $0.0 0% 0 $0.0 0% Utilities 0 $0.0 0% 0 $0.0 0% Total 147 $31.4 20 $2.5 Proceeds by Sector (% of $) YTD 2014 (Midyear 2014) Proceeds by Sector (% of $) YTD 2014 (Midyear 2014) 65% Bay Area IPO Trends 2014 Bay Area Pending IPOs (Filings) in 2014 (Midyear 2014) Bay Area IPO Watch List Company Industry IPO Status Target ($M) Box Technology
Recommended publications
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report

    SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report

    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit

    San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit

    DocuSign Envelope ID: 22F915A2-4A57-4DCD-ABD1-3562213B15D9 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 04-14-2020\DateSigned | 16:28:46\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ January 1 to March 31 2020 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER Kyle Thompson \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601
  • DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A

    DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A

    DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A. Sider, Planning Department Staff RE: Market Analysis of the Sale of Publicly Owned TDR In May 2012, Planning Department (“Department”) Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) an informational presentation on the City’s Transferable Development Rights (“TDR”) program. In February 2013, the Department retained Seifel Consulting, Inc. and C.H. Elliott & Associates (jointly, “Consultants”) to perform a market analysis informing a possible sale of TDR from City-owned properties. The resulting work product (“Report”) was delivered to the Department in late June. This memo and the attached Report are intended to provide the HPC with relevant follow-up information from the May 2012 hearing. The City’s TDR Program Since the mid-1980’s, the Planning Department has administered a TDR program (“Program”) through which certain historic properties can sell their unused development rights to certain non- historic properties. The program emerged from the 1985 Downtown Plan in response to unprecedented office growth, housing impacts, transportation impacts and the loss of historic buildings. The key goal of the Program is to maintain Downtown’s development potential while protecting historic resources. The metric that underpins the Program is Floor Area Ratio ("FAR"), which is the ratio of a building’s gross square footage to that of the parcel on which it sits. Under the Program, a Landmark, Significant, or Contributory building can sell un-built FAR capacity to a non-historic property which can then use it to supplement its base FAR allowance. TDRs can only be used to increase FAR within applicable height and bulk controls.
  • Transbay Joint Powers Authority

    Transbay Joint Powers Authority

    NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only RATINGS: See “RATINGS” In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming compliance with the tax covenants described herein, and the accuracy of certain representations and certifications made by the Authority, interest on the 2020 Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Tax-Exempt Bonds is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed under the Code. Interest on the Senior 2020A-T Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California (the “State”) under present State law. See “2020 TAX-EXEMPT BONDS TAX MATTERS” and “SENIOR 2020A-T BONDS TAX MATTERS” in this Official Statement regarding certain other tax considerations. TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY $189,480,000 $28,355,000 Senior Tax Allocation Bonds Senior Tax Allocation Bonds Series 2020A (Tax-Exempt) (Green Bonds) Series 2020A-T (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) $53,370,000 Subordinate Tax Allocation Bonds Series 2020B (Tax-Exempt) (Green Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1, as shown on inside cover Bonds. The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (the “Authority”) is issuing the above-captioned bonds (the “Senior 2020A Bonds,” the “Senior 2020A-T Bonds,” and the “Subordinate 2020B Bonds” and, collectively, the “2020 Bonds”).
  • 181 Fremont Street

    181 Fremont Street

    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 Case No.: 2007.0456E Reception: Project Title: 181 Fremont Street 415.558.6378 Zoning/Plan Area: C-3-0 (SD) Downtown Office Special Development District; Transit Center Commercial Special Use District; 415.558.6409 700-S Height and Bulk District; Transit Center District Plan Block/Lot: Planning 3719/10 & 11 Information: Lot Size: 15,312.5 square feet 415.558.6377 Project Sponsor: Daniel R. Kingsley, SKS Fremont, LLC, (415) 421-8200 Staff Contact: Michael Jacinto (415) 575-9033 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project sponsor, SKS Fremont, LLC, proposes to demolish two existing structures and develop one 700-foot-tall tower (745 feet to the top of the parapet/mechanical screen) on two lots located at the east side of Fremont Street immediately south of the new Transhay Transit Center that is currently under construction. The project site, as shown in Figure 1, comprises two parcels, is approximately 15,310 square feet in size, and is located within the approved Transit Center District Plan (TCDP or Plan) area. The proposed tower would include a mix of office, residential, and retail, along with five levels of below grade parking, off-street loading spaces, residential and office lobbies and amenities for the project residents (continued on next page). EXEMPT STATUS: Exempt per Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines California. REMARKS: (see page 18, below) DETERMINATION: I do hereby certify that the above determination has been made pursuant to State and Local requirements.
  • June 2016 San Francisco Residential Development

    June 2016 San Francisco Residential Development

    SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT JUNE 2016 NAVIGATION Click page numbers to be taken directly to page NEWS & MARKET CURRENTLY HIGHLIGHTS PERFORMANCE SELLING NEWS AND HIGHLIGHTS MARKET PERFORMANCE CURRENTLY SELLING Median $/SqFt Currently Year-Over-Year Month-Over-Month CURRENTLY SELLING... Luxe New Condominiump. $1,218/SqFt + 15% p. + 2% p. Nearly half of second phase is under contract. Price per square foot3 is 4 1650 Broadway at Van5 Ness | Pacific Heights Shipyard’s Resale Condominium $1,042/SqFt + 11% + 2% averaging approximately $760. The first phase averaged approximately $660 per Status: 34 units available/0 in-contract/0 closed square foot. New Apartment $5.10/SqFt + 7% N/A Pre-sale: August 2015 Closings anticipated: Q1 2016 Less than 100 units remain available at The Rockwell. Current absorption surpasses Project info: 34 units, 7-stories, 34 parking spaces 30 units a month. NEW CONDOMINIUM PRICING & VOLUME Developer: Belrich Partners Sales are expected to commence this month at the second phase of Onyx , consisting Architect: Forum Design of 21 condominiums. Median Price & Closing Volume Interior Design: Edmonds + Lee Features & Finishes: Marble tile and zinc facade, Floor- Closings have commenced at Lumina’s Plaza A. Price per square$1,200,000 foot is averaging 180 approximately $1,500. to-ceiling windows, Bay and Golden Gate views, Studio 160 Click development to be taken directly to page $1,000,000 Becker Cabinetry, Mobile kitchen islands, Caesarstone 140 Most Recent Quarter countertops, Subzero refrigerators, Thermador ap- $800,000ONE FRANKLIN 181 FREMONT ONE120 MISSION BAY THE HARRISONpliances, Uline THE wine coolers, PACIFIC Duravit and Hansgrohe 100 Median: $1,000,000 PROPOSED..
  • 400 Montgomery Street

    400 Montgomery Street

    400 Montgomery Street For Lease | Retail Space | North Financial District - San Francisco, CA This exceptionally well-located Downtown retail availability sits at the base of the historic 400 Montgomery Street - a 75,000 SF office building at the cross streets of Montgomery and California. Don’t miss this rare opportunity to front one of the Financial District’s busiest streets. Premises 1,951 Rentable Square Feet 20,253 Cars Per Day on Montgomery Ideal for Fitness, Non-Cooking Food, Estimated 22 Million Pedestrians or Service Per Year Pass the Intersection of Montgomery and California 101 PEIR 39 1 AQUATIC PARK JEFFERSON ST TAYLOR ST POWELL ST JONES ST MARINA GREEN NORTH POINT ST M BEACH ST A MASON ST Y R CASA WAY A IN W A KEARNY ST O B R L I V MARINA BLVD RICO WAY T JEFFERSON ST D STOCKTON ST BRODERICK ST E R GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL WEBSTER ST FORT BAY ST RECREATION AREA MASON NORTH POINT ST BUCHANAN ST GRANT AVE C PRADO ST CERVANTES BLVD R JEFFERSON ST BEACH ST HYDE ST IS S Y BAKER ST FI POLK ST BAY ST FRANCISCO ST CHESTNUT ST ELD A BEACH ST V BEACH ST MONTGOMERY ST E AVILA ST NORTH POINT ST GOUGH ST LARKIN ST T DIVISADERO ST BAY ST CHESTNUT ST H 101 E SCOTT ST E FILLMORE ST LOMBARD ST M CAPRA WAY FRANKLIN ST BAY ST B NORTH POINT ST A T SANSOME ST T E R S M FRANCISCO ST L C E A A G A D R L LOMBARD ST R D V B L A O GREENWICH ST E L M A LEAVENWORTH ST P R R B BAY ST H COLUMBUS AVE H L C O A A OCTAVIA ST CHESTNUT ST H PIERCE ST AY L N W W IL D O L BLV LIN S O A D Y LOMBARD ST C H TAYLOR ST CO TOLE GREENWICH ST K N L E E I N FILBERT ST L
  • 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 11 11 Total Building Transformation Digital, Media and Tech Powerhouse

    360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 11 11 Total Building Transformation Digital, Media and Tech Powerhouse

    Where Innovation Works… NAREIT Presentation San Francisco, CA November 12, 2013 John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO Welcome 1 Agenda 303 Second Street, San Francisco I. John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO, Welcome KRC II. Edwin M. Lee “Everybody’s Mayor, San Francisco Favorite City” III. John Kilroy 201 Third Street, San Francisco Chairman, President and CEO, KRC Update KRC IV. Chris Roeder San Francisco Managing Director, Market Update Jones Lang LaSalle 100 First Street, San Francisco V. Q&A VI. Cocktails and Hors d’ouevres 2 San Francisco Mayor Edwin M. Lee “Everybody's Favorite City” 3 John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO KRC Update 4 Investment Thesis LOCATION PHYSICALITY YIELD & TIMING Transbay Terminal Housing Options Retail Amenities Companies need high quality space in the best locations to attract and retain their workforces 5 Premier West Coast Franchise December 2009 Annualized Pro Forma 9/30/2013 13% GREATER SEATTLE GREATER Enterprise Value SEATTLE $6.5 Billion 35% 100% NORTHERN SOUTHERN Enterprise Value CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA $2.6 Billion SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA 52% LOS ANGELES 12/31/2009 SOUTHERN 9/30/2013 ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY SAN DIEGO KRC’s expanded and stronger platform generates significant value Note: Pro forma NOI reflects GAAP NOI for the 9 months ended 9/30/2013 annualized , including a full year’s contribution from acquisitions as well as near-term development projects (690 Middlefield, 331 Fairchild, 350 Mission Street, 555 N Mathilda Campus, 333 Brannan, Crossing 900, Columbia Square, The Heights) and 6 redevelopment projects currently in lease-up.
  • San Francisco Tall Buildings Study

    San Francisco Tall Buildings Study

    SAN FRANCISCO TALL BUILDINGS STUDY Disclaimer: While the information presented in this report is believed to be correct, the Applied Technology Council assumes no responsibility for its accuracy or for the opinions expressed herein. The material presented in this publication should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability, and applicability by qualified professionals. Users of information from this publication assume all liability arising from such use. San Francisco Tall Buildings Study Prepared by APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 240 Redwood City, California 94065 www.ATCouncil.org Prepared for City and County of San Francisco Office of Resilience and Capital Planning Brian Strong, Chief Resilience Officer and Director Danielle Mieler, Principal Resilience Analyst San Francisco, California ATC MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT PROJECT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Ayse Hortacsu John D. Hooper (Task Leader) Justin Moresco David Bonowitz Gregory Deierlein PROJECT WORKING GROUPS Shahriar Vahdani Carlos Molina Hutt Preetish Kakoty CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Anne McLeod Hulsey TALL BUILDINGS EXECUTIVE PANEL Alireza Eksir Monfared Naomi Kelly (Chair) Max Rattie Mary Ellen Carroll Wen-Yi Yen Kathryn How Tom Hui TASK REVIEW PANEL Brian Strong Mark X. Haley William Walton December 2018 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TALL BUILDINGS STAKEHOLDERS Board of Supervisors Business District 3 San Francisco Chamber of Commerce District 6 Real Estate
  • City and County of San Francisco

    City and County of San Francisco

    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 30, 2019 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: Fitch: “AA+” See “RATING” herein. In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications described in this Official Statement, under existing law, the interest on the Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. Interest on the Bonds is not intended to be exempt from federal income taxation. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding other federal or State tax consequences relating to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014-1 (TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTER) $31,940,000* $152,205,000* Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019B (Federally Taxable) (Federally Taxable – Green Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of the security or terms of this issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. The City and County of San Francisco, California (the “City”) on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) (the “District”) will be issuing Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A (Federally Taxable) (the “2019A Bonds”) and Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019B (Federally Taxable – Green Bonds) (the “2019B Bonds” and, together with the 2019A Bonds, the “2019 Bonds”).
  • Tehama San Francisco | California

    Tehama San Francisco | California

    36 Tehama san francisco | California TRANSBAY MICRO-UNIT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1288HOWARD 36Tehama Executive Summary Colliers International is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire 36 Tehama, (the “Property” or “Project”), an incredible Transbay development opportunity located in the San Francisco’s downtown core. The Project features an irreplaceable location surrounded by San Francisco’s most notable office occupiers including Salesforce and Facebook who occupy nearly 3.5M square feet of space steps from the Project’s front door. 2 Residential Micro-unit Project 45 8 419 Total Units Levels Avg. unit size NORTHPOINT ST. NORTHPOINT ST. COLUMBUS ST. BAY ST. BAY ST. VANDEWATER ST. 18,855 ST. MIDWAY Type III BRET HARTE WORDEN ST. FRANCISCO ST. FRANCISCO ST. THE EMBARCADERO Total SaleableWATER ST. Sq. Ft. Construction HOUSTON ST. PFEIFFER ST. BELL AIR ST. BELL CHESTNUT ST. CHESTNUT ST. VENARD FIELDING ST. WHITING ST. CULEBRA WINTHROP ST. WINTHROP JULIUS NEWELL ST. NEWELL LOMBARD ST. LOMBARD ST. EDGARDO PL. BLACKSTONE TUSCANY CHILD ST. EDITH JANSEN ST. TELEGRAPH GREENWICH ST. GREENWICH ST. 0 500 BRANT T PARDEE E L KRAMER GERKE E ROACH ST. G VALPARAISO ST. VALPARAISO ST. R HARRIS PL. A Scale in Feet P H VIA BUFANO VIA High-rise Alternative Hotel B L V D DARELL NAPIER SCOTLAND ST. ATTRIDGE FILBERT ST. FILBERT ST. HARWOOD HAVENS ST. ALTA ST. ALTA ST. REDFIELD ALLADIN TER. SCHOOL NOBLE'S PL. GENOA ALLEN ST. HASTINGS KENT ST. CADELL MOORE MARION PL. BLACK PL. UNION ST. UNION ST. WARNER SHARP WEBB PL. WINTER ROCKLAND PRICE RUSSELL ST. MACONDRAY LN. MONTAGUE COMMERCE ST.
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit

    San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit

    DocuSign Envelope ID: E93BA072-AAE3-4AE2-B931-BCA55432FAA2 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 07-14-2020\DateSigned | 08:21:52\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ April 1 to June 30 2020 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER John Fogarty \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd, Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601 California