DOCSLIB.ORG

360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 11 11 Total Building Transformation Digital, Media and Tech Powerhouse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 11 11 Total Building Transformation Digital, Media and Tech Powerhouse Where Innovation Works… NAREIT Presentation San Francisco, CA November 12, 2013 John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO Welcome 1 Agenda 303 Second Street, San Francisco I. John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO, Welcome KRC II. Edwin M. Lee “Everybody’s Mayor, San Francisco Favorite City” III. John Kilroy 201 Third Street, San Francisco Chairman, President and CEO, KRC Update KRC IV. Chris Roeder San Francisco Managing Director, Market Update Jones Lang LaSalle 100 First Street, San Francisco V. Q&A VI. Cocktails and Hors d’ouevres 2 San Francisco Mayor Edwin M. Lee “Everybody's Favorite City” 3 John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO KRC Update 4 Investment Thesis LOCATION PHYSICALITY YIELD & TIMING Transbay Terminal Housing Options Retail Amenities Companies need high quality space in the best locations to attract and retain their workforces 5 Premier West Coast Franchise December 2009 Annualized Pro Forma 9/30/2013 13% GREATER SEATTLE GREATER Enterprise Value SEATTLE $6.5 Billion 35% 100% NORTHERN SOUTHERN Enterprise Value CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA $2.6 Billion SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA 52% LOS ANGELES 12/31/2009 SOUTHERN 9/30/2013 ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY SAN DIEGO KRC’s expanded and stronger platform generates significant value Note: Pro forma NOI reflects GAAP NOI for the 9 months ended 9/30/2013 annualized , including a full year’s contribution from acquisitions as well as near-term development projects (690 Middlefield, 331 Fairchild, 350 Mission Street, 555 N Mathilda Campus, 333 Brannan, Crossing 900, Columbia Square, The Heights) and 6 redevelopment projects currently in lease-up. Proud to be a part of the San Francisco landscape KRC’s SOMA Portfolio – 2.7mm SF • $777 mm in acquisitions; 2.1mm SF • $368 PSF basis • $378 mm of estimated development investment KRC’s SOMA Footprint San Francisco, CA 7 7 You Can’t Ignore The 21st Century “Modern” Workforce Decline in Office Space The Millennial Generation per U.S. Worker (Per square feet) 600 225 176 151 1970s 2010 2012 2017E Source: CBRE. KRC’s Commitment to Sustainable Practices . 37% of portfolio is LEED certified . 50% of portfolio is ENERGY STAR certified . Development projects 100% LEED certified 8 Responding to the 21st century “modern” workforce 201 Third Street San Francisco, CA 9 9 “Shaping old into new state of the art” Medium for stimulating environments 201 Third Street San Francisco, CA 10 10 BEFORE… Case Study: 360 Third … AFTER Street What We Purchased? • Former Pac Bell building, built in 1974 as a call center Why We Purchased? • Terrific location - proximity to BART, Caltrain and Muni • Large, efficient floor plates about 68,000 SF Opportunity • Created “South Beach” rooftop deck • Upgraded lobbies and elevators to state of the art • Secure bike storage and showers • Collaborative breakout areas • Parking garage and on-site management office • LEED Gold certification 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 11 11 Total Building Transformation Digital, media and tech powerhouse 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 12 12 “What the tenants want” Amenities for today’s workforce 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 13 13 “Cool in the city” Urban rooftop terrace 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 14 14 Inspiring creativity 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 15 15 “Feels a little less like work, with inviting spaces where people eat, chat and relax” 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 16 16 Chance interactions and creative collisions 360 Third Street San Francisco, CA 17 17 UPDATE ON NEAR-TERM DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Facilities to Attract and Retain the Modern Workforce 18 KRC’s Current and Near-Term Development Pipeline Total Estimated Total Project Investment Square Feet Current Projects $792 Million 1.4 Million 12% of enterprise value Near-Term Projects Columbia Square (Mixed Use) $670 Million 1.1 Million Crossing/900 10% of enterprise value 333 Brannan $2.3 Billion TOTAL $1.5 Billion 2.5 Million 22% of enterprise value 19 On-Time and On-Budget to Provide Significant Shareholder Value Construction Completion 2013 - 2014 2015 2016 Columbia Square Phase II Crossing 900 Columbia Square Phase I 333 Brannan Creating Significant Shareholder Value Historical average of ~80% leased upon completion 20 Bringing Hollywood back… • $390 million total investment • 675,000 square feet of office, residential and retail Columbia Square – Mixed Use Project Hollywood, CA 21 21 Contemporary work place Columbia Square – Mixed Use Project Hollywood, CA 22 22 A Transit Centric Location • $180 million total investment • 300,000 square feet of office Crossing 900 Redwood City, CA 23 23 An Urban Village Aesthetic. A Whole New Vibe. Crossing 900 Redwood City, CA 24 24 The Future is now… • $95-$100 million total investment • 170,000 square feet of office • LEED Platinum-certified • Building integrated photovoltaics • Living roof • High performance building envelope 333 Brannan Street San Francisco, CA 25 25 Where people interact with nature in an urban environment 333 Brannan Street San Francisco, CA 26 26 It’s a New Era in Office Space • Circles, squares and triangles • 21st century modern workforce • KRC is well positioned to capitalize on opportunities 201 Third Street San Francisco, CA 27 27 Chris Roeder Managing Director, Jones Lang LaSalle “Live, Work, Play” 28 “KRC’s Grand Entrance” 1. Invested the “right” product in the “right” submarkets a) SOMA b) Value-add properties with large floor plates 2. Progressive work environments a) Modern lobbies b) Collaborative space c) Amenities: roof decks, landscaped plazas, bike rooms with showers 3. Expedited delivery and deal process: a) Spec suites ready for occupancy b) Well-oiled machine 29 Supply Continues to Shrink Large Block Availability Trend 10,000,000 120 Large blocks of space have been on the decline Available Space No of Blocks 9,000,000 110 – especially among blocks over 100,000 SF 8,000,000 100 7,000,000 90 6,000,000 80 5,000,000 70 4,000,000 Supply & Demand 3,000,000 60 2,000,000 50 Number of blocks Number of requirements 54 200,000 + 53 2 100,000 - 199,999 10 222 Second Street, 535 Mission Street, 181 7 75,000 - 99,999 5 Fremont Street, 1 Tenth Street, 22 Fourth Street 17 50,000 - 74,999 14 34 30,000 - 49,999 30 Source: Jones Lang LaSalle 30 Tenant Demand Remains Steady into 2013 – Continued Office Expansion Expected Demand by Industry (SF) Technology 1,898,000 Financial Services 1,121,200 Professional Services 647,000 Legal 585,000 Education 541,000 Media/Entertainment 490,400 Advertising/Marketing/PR 350,500 Government 335,000 Historical Leasing Activity (SF) Real Estate 228,000 2013 Projected 11,200,000+ Insurance 133,000 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2012 11,131,816 2011 10,786,225 Leasing activity projected to accelerate into 2014 with a number of large deals to close before year-end 2010 8,578,354 2009 6,090,714 - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 Source: Jones Lang LaSalle 31 Record Leasing Activity and Large Deals Leading up to and Through 2013 18 of the 35 deals (51.0 percent) San Francisco Completed Leases over 100,000 square feet in the last Tenants +100,000 SF, 1995 - 2013 36 months have been on account of ’11 – ‘13: 35 deals in 36 months technology tenants ’99 – ‘00: 13 deals in 24 months ’06 – ‘07: 15 deals in 24 months 3,000,000 2,575,052 14 2,389,559 2,567,771 13 12 2,500,000 12 10 P 10 2,000,000 9 1,197,984 9 r 1,613,412 8 o 8 1,497,909 j 1,500,000 1,187,152 7 1,230,099 e 6 6 c 6 Square Square Footage 899,487 827,199 5 5 t Number of deals 1,000,000 4 473,007 873,314 e 758,634 4 464,000 d 244,552 312,000 3 3 500,000 155,000 153,000 115,000 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Year Total SF Number of deals completed Source: Jones Lang LaSalle 32 Absorption Driven by Technology Industry - Expected to Continue Year-end 2013 absorption expected to be 1.0 M SF+ Technology continues to lead net absorption Source: Jones Lang LaSalle 33 John Kilroy Chairman, President and CEO Conclusion 34 Focused on High-Growth, Best Performing West Coast Markets Centers of innovation and creativity Greater Seattle Fremont Lake Union, Seattle Gateway, coastal markets Critical mass of knowledge 100 First Street, San Francisco companies San Francisco Bay Area Highly educated Tribeca West, Los Los Angeles workforce Angeles San Diego Great quality of life Kilroy Centre Del Mar, San Diego 35 Q&A 36 Where Innovation Works… 37 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 22F915A2-4A57-4DCD-ABD1-3562213B15D9 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 04-14-2020\DateSigned | 16:28:46\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ January 1 to March 31 2020 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER Kyle Thompson \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Hamburger
    The Millennium Tower Settlement, Tilting and Upgrade University of Kansas Ronald O. Hamburger, S.E., SECB March 5, 2020 • Constructed 2005-2009 • 58 stories, 645 ft (197m) tall • Tallest & most expensive residential tower in San Francisco • Views from the Sierra to the Cascades to the Farallon Islands • Most expensive unit sold in 2013 for $13.5 million • Construction Cost - $600 Million Sales Cost - $750 Million 2 301 Mission The Site 350 Mission Transbay terminal and track tube 2012 2009 200 Beale 2017 Salesforce Tower 3 2014 History of the Problem • Ground breaking – 2005 – Settlement predicted 4”-6” • Construction completed 2009 – Settlement reached 10” – Transbay Terminal excavation starts • Last unit sold in 2013 – Settlement 13” • SGH retained in 2014 – Settlement 15” • Litigation initiated in 2016 – Settlement 17” • Adjacent construction complete 2017 – Settlement 18”, Tilt 17” to northwest 4 Some Homeowners Joe Montana Hall of Fame Quarterback Hunter Pence San Francisco Giants Superstar Steph Curry Golden State Warriors Icon 5 Some Homeowners Laurence Kornfield Retired Chief Deputy Building Inspector, City of SF Jerry Dodson Personal Injury Attorney 6 Why did this happen? San Francisco Downtown Area of “infirm” soils based on SF General Plan Subsurface profile (from Treadwell & Rollo) 8 10’ thick mat Subsurface conditions 75’ piles deep into Colma Sand 20’ (6m) – fill & rubble loose sand, brick, concrete, gravel 30’ (10m) – Young Bay Clay marine deposits – last 12,000 years 35’ (12m) – Colma Sand cemented sands with clay binder
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A
    DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A. Sider, Planning Department Staff RE: Market Analysis of the Sale of Publicly Owned TDR In May 2012, Planning Department (“Department”) Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) an informational presentation on the City’s Transferable Development Rights (“TDR”) program. In February 2013, the Department retained Seifel Consulting, Inc. and C.H. Elliott & Associates (jointly, “Consultants”) to perform a market analysis informing a possible sale of TDR from City-owned properties. The resulting work product (“Report”) was delivered to the Department in late June. This memo and the attached Report are intended to provide the HPC with relevant follow-up information from the May 2012 hearing. The City’s TDR Program Since the mid-1980’s, the Planning Department has administered a TDR program (“Program”) through which certain historic properties can sell their unused development rights to certain non- historic properties. The program emerged from the 1985 Downtown Plan in response to unprecedented office growth, housing impacts, transportation impacts and the loss of historic buildings. The key goal of the Program is to maintain Downtown’s development potential while protecting historic resources. The metric that underpins the Program is Floor Area Ratio ("FAR"), which is the ratio of a building’s gross square footage to that of the parcel on which it sits. Under the Program, a Landmark, Significant, or Contributory building can sell un-built FAR capacity to a non-historic property which can then use it to supplement its base FAR allowance. TDRs can only be used to increase FAR within applicable height and bulk controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Action Settlement Agreement
    CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Class Action Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of March 9, 2020 (the “Execution Date”) by and among the Class Action Settling Parties as defined below. Capitalized terms used herein are defined in Section II of this Agreement or indicated in parentheses elsewhere in this Agreement. I. FACTUAL REPRESENTATIONS 1.1 On or about July 21, 2017, Maui Peaks Corporation filed the Class Action against Transbay Joint Powers Authority (“TJPA”), Mission Street Development LLC (“MSD”), and Mission Street Holding LLC (“MSH”) on behalf of themselves and other owners of residential units in the Millennium Tower alleging causes of action relating to Plaintiffs’ allegations concerning, inter alia, the movement and tilt of Millennium Tower; 1.2 On September 14, 2017 Maui Peaks Corporation and NGMII LLC filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint in the Class Action against MSD, MSH and TJPA; 1.3 On or about January 5, 2018, Maui Peaks Corporation and NGMII LLC filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint in the Class Action against MSD, MSH and TJPA; 1.4 On or about July 17, 2019, NGMII LLC and Ian Kao filed a Third Amended Class Action Complaint in the Class Action alleging causes of action for failure to disclose and for deceptive business practices against MSD and MSH, and causes of action for, inter alia, express indemnity, specific performance, and declaratory relief against TJPA, and Maui Peaks Corporation asserted those same causes of action against the same defendants on its own behalf;
    [Show full text]
  • Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only RATINGS: See “RATINGS” In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming compliance with the tax covenants described herein, and the accuracy of certain representations and certifications made by the Authority, interest on the 2020 Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Tax-Exempt Bonds is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed under the Code. Interest on the Senior 2020A-T Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California (the “State”) under present State law. See “2020 TAX-EXEMPT BONDS TAX MATTERS” and “SENIOR 2020A-T BONDS TAX MATTERS” in this Official Statement regarding certain other tax considerations. TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY $189,480,000 $28,355,000 Senior Tax Allocation Bonds Senior Tax Allocation Bonds Series 2020A (Tax-Exempt) (Green Bonds) Series 2020A-T (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) $53,370,000 Subordinate Tax Allocation Bonds Series 2020B (Tax-Exempt) (Green Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1, as shown on inside cover Bonds. The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (the “Authority”) is issuing the above-captioned bonds (the “Senior 2020A Bonds,” the “Senior 2020A-T Bonds,” and the “Subordinate 2020B Bonds” and, collectively, the “2020 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Millennium Tower, San Francisco
    MILLENNIUM TOWER, SAN FRANCISCO Settlement, Tilting and Repair John A. Egan GE Ronald O. Hamburger, SE Senior Principal, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Nathaniel Wagner, PE Project Engineer, Slate Geotech 16 February 2021 • Constructed 2005-2009 • 58 stories, 645 ft (197m) tall • Tallest & most expensive residential tower in San Francisco • Views from the Sierra to the Cascades to the Farallon Islands • Most expensive unit sold in 2013 for $13.5 million • Construction Cost - $600 Million Sales Cost - $750 Million 2 Some Homeowners Joe Montana Hall of Fame Quarterback Hunter Pence San Francisco Giants Superstar 3 The Site 301 Mission 2005-2009 350 Mission Transbay terminal and track tube 2012 2009-2017 200 Beale 2017-18 Salesforce Tower 4 2014-16 History of the Problem • Groundbreaking – 2005 – Settlement predicted 4”-6” • Construction completed 2009 – Settlement reached 10” – Transbay Terminal excavation starts • Last unit sold in 2013 – Settlement 13” • SGH retained in 2014 – Settlement 15” • Litigation initiated in 2016 – Settlement 17” • Adjacent construction complete 2017 – Settlement 18”, Tilt 17” to northwest 5 Why did this happen? San Francisco Downtown Area of “infirm” soils based on SF General Plan 10’ thick mat Subsurface conditions 75’ piles deep into Colma Sand 20’ (6m) – fill & rubble loose sand, brick, concrete, gravel 30’ (10m) – Young Bay Clay marine deposits – last 12,000 years 35’ (12m) – Colma Sand cemented sands with clay binder (bearing pressures up to 6 -8 ksf) 140’ (45m) – Old Bay Clay overconsolidated clays with layers
    [Show full text]
  • BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project
    Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District April 30, 2018 Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project Prepared for San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 300 Lakeside Drive, 21st floor Oakland, CA 94612 Prepared by 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 April 30, 2018 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date of Publication of Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: April 30, 2018 Project Title: BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project Sponsor and Lead Agency: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Contact Person and Phone Number: Janie Layton, (510) 874-7423 Project Location: Downtown San Francisco BART Stations (Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza). Project Description: The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), in cooperation with the City and County of San Francisco, is working to improve escalator durability and security at station entrances/exits along Market Street leading to the underground Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza station concourses. The existing entrances/exits consist of variations of side-by-side stairs and escalators leading down to the underground concourse level, and are currently uncovered and exposed to inclement weather and discarded trash leading to frequent breakdowns of the existing escalators. The proposed improvements would include the installation of canopy covers over the entrances/exits, as well as replacement and refurbishment of existing street-level escalators. Each protective canopy would also be equipped with a motorized security grille that would lock at the sidewalk level of the station entrance/exit when the stations are closed.
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Montgomery Street
    400 Montgomery Street For Lease | Retail Space | North Financial District - San Francisco, CA This exceptionally well-located Downtown retail availability sits at the base of the historic 400 Montgomery Street - a 75,000 SF office building at the cross streets of Montgomery and California. Don’t miss this rare opportunity to front one of the Financial District’s busiest streets. Premises 1,951 Rentable Square Feet 20,253 Cars Per Day on Montgomery Ideal for Fitness, Non-Cooking Food, Estimated 22 Million Pedestrians or Service Per Year Pass the Intersection of Montgomery and California 101 PEIR 39 1 AQUATIC PARK JEFFERSON ST TAYLOR ST POWELL ST JONES ST MARINA GREEN NORTH POINT ST M BEACH ST A MASON ST Y R CASA WAY A IN W A KEARNY ST O B R L I V MARINA BLVD RICO WAY T JEFFERSON ST D STOCKTON ST BRODERICK ST E R GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL WEBSTER ST FORT BAY ST RECREATION AREA MASON NORTH POINT ST BUCHANAN ST GRANT AVE C PRADO ST CERVANTES BLVD R JEFFERSON ST BEACH ST HYDE ST IS S Y BAKER ST FI POLK ST BAY ST FRANCISCO ST CHESTNUT ST ELD A BEACH ST V BEACH ST MONTGOMERY ST E AVILA ST NORTH POINT ST GOUGH ST LARKIN ST T DIVISADERO ST BAY ST CHESTNUT ST H 101 E SCOTT ST E FILLMORE ST LOMBARD ST M CAPRA WAY FRANKLIN ST BAY ST B NORTH POINT ST A T SANSOME ST T E R S M FRANCISCO ST L C E A A G A D R L LOMBARD ST R D V B L A O GREENWICH ST E L M A LEAVENWORTH ST P R R B BAY ST H COLUMBUS AVE H L C O A A OCTAVIA ST CHESTNUT ST H PIERCE ST AY L N W W IL D O L BLV LIN S O A D Y LOMBARD ST C H TAYLOR ST CO TOLE GREENWICH ST K N L E E I N FILBERT ST L
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Notice of Preparation and Initial Study
    APPENDIX A. NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND INITIAL STUDY July 31, 2013 75 Howard Street Project Case No. 2011.1122E Draft EIR Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date: December 12, 2012 Case No.: 2011.1122E Project Title: 75 Howard Street Project Zoning: C-3-O(SD) – Downtown Office (Special Development) 200-S Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: Block 3741/ Lot 31, Block 3742/ Lot 12, and a portion of Block 3741 / Lot 35 Lot Size: 20,595 square feet (approximately 0.48 acres) Project Sponsor PPF Paramount Group 75 Howard Garage, LLP Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department Staff Contact: Don Lewis – (415) 575-9095 [email protected] A Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the above‐referenced project, described below, has been issued by the Planning Department. The NOP/Initial Study is either attached or is available upon request from Don Lewis, whom you may reach at (415) 575‐9095 or at the address above. It is also available online at http://tinyurl.com/sfceqadocs. This notice is being sent to you because you have been identified as potentially having an interest in the project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 75 Howard Street Project site is located on the south side of Howard Street at the intersection of Howard and Steuart Streets, in San Francisco’s Financial District, and within the Transit Center District Plan (TCDP) area. The project site consists of three lots and a portion of street right-of-way: Assessor’s Block 3741 / Lot 31, which is owned by PPF Paramount, 75 Howard Garage, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit
    DocuSign Envelope ID: E93BA072-AAE3-4AE2-B931-BCA55432FAA2 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 07-14-2020\DateSigned | 08:21:52\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ April 1 to June 30 2020 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER John Fogarty \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd, Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601 California
    [Show full text]
  • BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project
    Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project State Clearinghouse Number 2018042081 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District June 2018 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project State Clearinghouse Number 2018042081 Prepared for San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 300 Lakeside Drive, 21st floor Oakland, CA 94612 Prepared by AECOM 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 June 2018 Introduction The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) is acting as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project (proposed project). BART is working in cooperation with the City and County of San Francisco to install canopy covers over the majority of the entrances/exits at the four downtown San Francisco BART/Muni stations (Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza), as well as replace/refurbish existing street-level escalators. On April 30, 2018, BART published a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) which analyzed potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The Draft IS/MND was available for a 30-day public review period from April 30, 2018 to May 30, 2018 pursuant to Section 15073 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Notice of Availability and Notice of Intent (NOA/NOI) to adopt the IS/MND was posted with the City and County of San Francisco Clerk and the State Clearinghouse, mailed to all residents and businesses within ¼-mile of the project site, emailed to the project’s listserv of relevant stakeholders and interested people, made available on the BART website, and provided for public review at the San Francisco Main Library at Civic Center.
    [Show full text]