Centre for Conservation Science Partners

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Centre for Conservation Science Partners Erciyes University, Turkey Malloch Society Ethiopian Wildlife & Natural History Society Government of Malta European Bird Census Council Malta Museum of Natural History Partnerships European Environment Agency Mammal Society European Commission Manchester Metropolitan University European Food Safety Authority Manx Atlas Project European Topic Centre: Biological Diversity Marine Conservation Society By working with a wide range of partners, the British High Commission, New Delhi, India European Union Environment Council Marine Biological Association British High Commission, Kolkata, India exeGesIS Spatial Data Management Ltd Max Planck Institut für Ornithologie RSPB maximises the quantity and quality of British Lichen Society Fauna and Flora International Ministry of Defence conservation science that it can undertake. British Museum of Natural History Field Ornithology Group of Sri Lanka Montana State University Underpinning much of this is the huge contribution British Mycological Society Flag Ecology Montserrat Government British Ornithologists’ Union Flemish Land Agency (VLM), Belgium Montserrat National Trust made by thousands of birdwatchers in the British Sugar Food Animal Initiative, Wytham Government of Morocco surveying, monitoring and ringing of birds, within British Trust for Ornithology Footprint Ecology NABU (German Society for Nature Conservation) the UK and further afield. Their contribution, and British Wind Energy Association Forest Enterprise National Aviary, USA Michael Brombacher Forest Research National Biodiversity Network the partnerships with them, are invaluable. Brooms Barn Experimental Research Station Forestry Division, Sierra Leone National Bird of Prey Trust The following organisations and individuals were Buccleugh Estate Francis Kirkham National Energy Foundation active partners in RSPB research during the Buglife Freshwater Habitats Trust (formerly Pond Conservation) National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds Friends of the Chagos National Geographic Society period 2003 – 2013. Bumblebee Conservation Trust Friends of Nature, Nepal National Institute of Agricultural Botany Bumblebee Working Group G Spoor Associates National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand Burung Indonesia Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT) National Museums of Kenya Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability Butterfly Conservation Gdansk Ornithological Station – Polish Academy of Sciences National Parks and Wildlife Service, Republic of Ireland Aberystwyth University CABI Bioscience Kai Gedeon National Parks and Wildlife Service, Kenya Academy of Sciences, Belarus Government of Cambodia General Commission for Al Badia Management and National Trust Acorus Ltd Cambridge Conservation Forum Development, Syria National Trust for Nature Conservation, Nepal Aculeate Conservation Group Cape Verde Government Ghana Wildlife Society National Trust for Scotland Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Grampian Ringing Group National Trust of the Cayman Islands ADAS UK Ltd Reading (CAER) Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science National Zoological Gardens of South Africa African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement Secretariat Central Science Laboratory (CSL) Harper Adams University College Natur Vårds Verket, Sweden Allerton Research and Education Trust Chagos Conservation Trust Haryana Forest Department, India Natural England Alpenzoo, Innsbruck-Tirol, Austria Charles Darwin University Hawk and Owl Trust Natural Environment Research Council American Bird Conservancy Chough Study Groups Hawk Conservancy Trust Natural History Museum, London Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Chizé Centre for Biological Studies (CEBC-CNRS), France Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Germany Natural History Museum, Nepal Andhra Pradesh Forest Department Central Institute for Research on Goats – India Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia Natural History Museum, Paris Anglia Ruskin University Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) Himalayan Nature, Nepal Natural Research Ltd Government of Anguilla Colorado State University Dr Mike Hounsome Natural Resources Wales [formerly Countryside Council Anguilla National Trust Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland Hungarian Academy of Sciences for Wales] APB – BirdLife Belarus Conservation Metrics Hungarian Ornithological and Nature Conservation Society (MME) Naturama (Burkina Faso BirdLife Partner) AP Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, Nigeria Conservation International Hymettus NatureKenya Aquatic Warbler Conservation Team Conservation Society of Sierra Leone Dr Hugh Insley NatureUganda Ascension Conservation Consortium for Conservation Medicine Indian Council of Agricultural Research Neo Human Foundation, India Ashmolean Natural History Society of Oxford Countryside Council for Wales Indian Poultry Diagnostics and Research Centre Neotropical Bird Club State Government of Assam Cranfield University Indian Veterinary Research Institute New Zealand Department of Conservation Association of British Fungus Groups Crown Estate Institute for Environment and Sustainability Nigerian Conservation Foundation Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity in Kazakhstan Czech Society for Ornithology Institute of Grassland & Environmental Research North of England Zoological Society, Chester Zoo National Audubon Society Defence Estates Institute of Zoology, London North Wyke Research Australian Animal Health Laboratory Defence Training Estates North Institute of Zoology, Minsk Northern England Raptor Forum Azov-Black Sea Ornithological Station De Montford University Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos – Spain Northern Ireland Environment Agency British Association for Shooting and Conservation De Wildt Cheetah and Wildlife Trust, South Africa InterRegII Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Bat Conservation Trust Denny Ecology International Advisory Group for Northern Bald Ibis Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust Biodiversity and Nature Conservation Association, Myanmar Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs International Centre for Birds of Prey Nyiregyhaza College, Hungary Biodiversity Indicator Partnership Department of Environment, Montserrat International Union for Conservation of Nature The Open University Biological Records Centre Department des Eaux et Foret, Morocco Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Italy The Organic Milk Suppliers Cooperative Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Island Conservation Oriental Bird Club Biosfera, Cape Verde Northern Ireland Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group Ornithological Society of Pakistan Bird Conservation Nepal Department of Forest and Wildlife, India Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, Bologna Parc National de Souss-Massa, Morocco Bird Conservation Society of Thailand Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Jagiellonian University Parc National des Oiseaux du Djoudj, Senegal Bird Education Society, Nepal Thailand The James Hutton Institute (and previously The Macaulay Land Paul-Cézanne University BirdLife International Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal Use Research Institute) People’s Trust for Endangered Species BirdLife Botswana Directorate of National Parks, Ministry of Forestry, Turkey Joint Nature Conservation Committee Penny Anderson Associates BirdLife Cyprus Doga Dernegi (Turkey BirdLife partner) Joint Research Centre of the European Commission The Peregrine Fund BirdLife Malta Doñana Biological Station King’s College London Percy Fitzpatrick Institute of African Ornithology BirdWatch Ireland Durham University Koshi Camp ,Nepal Perthshire Black Grouse Study Group Bombay Natural History Society Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Laboratoire D’Analyses et Récherches Vétérinaire D’Agadir, Plantlife Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI) East Yorkshire Ringing Group Agadir, Morocco Plymouth Marine Laboratory Bournemouth University EC Joint Research Centre: Institute for Environment and Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan (Indonesian Institute of Sciences) Polish Society for the Protection of Birds (OTOP) Brandenburg State Agency for Large Protected Areas Sustainability Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust Portuguese Society for the Study of Birds (SPEA) Bretagne Vivante ENCI Foundation, Netherlands Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux, France Poultry Diagnostics Research Centre, India British Antarctic Survey Endangered Wildlife Trust / Vulture Study Group, South Africa Linking Environment and farming (LEAF) Preservation of small landscape elements in Limburg Foundation British Arachnological Society Entotax Consultants UK Konrad Lorenz Institute (IKL; Netherlands) British Birds Environment Agency Makerere University Institute of the Environment and Princeton University British Bryological Society Environment Systems Natural Resources QPQ Software Queen's University, Belfast University of Castilla-La Mancha Queen’s University, Kingston University of Chiang Mai Rainforest Alliance University of Coimbra Rare Breeding Birds Panel University of Copenhagen Rare and Endangered Species Trust, Namibia University of Cork Red Panda Network, Nepal University of Coventry Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development University of Durham (ILS; Germany) University of East Anglia Rhino and Lion Wildlife Conservation NPO University of Edinburgh Rothamsted Research
Recommended publications
  • The Biology and Management of the River Dee
    THEBIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OFTHE RIVERDEE INSTITUTEofTERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY NATURALENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL á Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY The biology and management of the River Dee Edited by DAVID JENKINS Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens, Glassel BANCHORY Kincardineshire 2 Printed in Great Britain by The Lavenham Press Ltd, Lavenham, Suffolk NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATIONDATA The biology and management of the River Dee.—(ITE symposium, ISSN 0263-8614; no. 14) 1. Stream ecology—Scotland—Dee River 2. Dee, River (Grampian) I. Jenkins, D. (David), 1926– II. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Ill. Series 574.526323'094124 OH141 ISBN 0 904282 88 0 COVER ILLUSTRATION River Dee west from Invercauld, with the high corries and plateau of 1196 m (3924 ft) Beinn a'Bhuird in the background marking the watershed boundary (Photograph N Picozzi) The centre pages illustrate part of Grampian Region showing the water shed of the River Dee. Acknowledgements All the papers were typed by Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs E J P Allen, ITE Banchory. Considerable help during the symposium was received from Dr N G Bayfield, Mr J W H Conroy and Mr A D Littlejohn. Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs J Jenkins helped with the organization of the symposium. Mrs J King checked all the references and Mrs P A Ward helped with the final editing and proof reading. The photographs were selected by Mr N Picozzi. The symposium was planned by a steering committee composed of Dr D Jenkins (ITE), Dr P S Maitland (ITE), Mr W M Shearer (DAES) and Mr J A Forster (NCC).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Rural Affairs and Environment Committee
    RURAL AFFAIRS AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE WILDLIFE AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT (SCOTLAND) BILL WRITTEN SUBMISSION FROM DR ADAM WATSON Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill, consultation I request members of the Rural Affairs & Environment Committee to take the decisive action that is long overdue to end the widespread and increasing illegal persecution of protected Scottish raptors. Leading MSPs and Scottish Ministers in the previous Labour/Lib Dem coalition and the present SNP administration have condemned this unlawful activity, calling it a national disgrace. However, it continues unabated, involving poisoning as well as shooting and other illegal activities. Indeed, it has increased, as is evident from the marked declines in numbers and distribution of several species that are designated as in the highest national and international ranks for protection. In 1943 I began in upper Deeside to study golden eagles, which have now been monitored there for much longer than anywhere else in the world. I have also studied peregrines and other Scottish raptor species, and snowy owls in arctic Canada. This research resulted in many papers in scientific journals. An example was in 1989 when I was author of a scientific paper that reviewed data on golden eagles from 1944 to 1981. It showed the adverse effects of eagle persecution on grouse moors, in contrast to deer forests where the birds were generally protected or ignored by resident deerstalkers. Also it showed how a decline of such persecution during the Second World War, when many grouse-moor keepers were in the armed services, led to a notable increase of resident eagle pairs on grouse moors.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cairngorm Club Journal 110, 2013
    76 BOOK REVIEWS The Cairngorms: 100 Years of Mountaineering. Greg Strange, 2101. Scottish Mountaineering Trust, 400pp. ISBN 978-1-907233-1-1 This magisterial volume by the author of a well-used SMC climbing guide to the Cairngorms, covers the century from 1893 (the ascent of the Douglas-Gibson Gully) onwards. To this Club, founded six years earlier, that choice of starting date may seem odd, even contentious, but it signals that the focus of this book is firmly about climbing on rock and ice, even if there are occasional mentions of skiing, bothies, some environmental issues (hill tracks, the Lurcher's Gully Inquiry, but not climate change) and even walks. Given that focus, it is hard to fault the book, at least from a non/ex-climber's viewpoint: it takes the reader through each main first ascent with a happy mixture of background information on the participants, the day (and/or night) as a whole, and sufficient detail on the main pitches, including verbatim (or at least reported) conversations. Delightfully, most pages carry a photograph of the relevant route, landscape or character(s), the accumulation of which must represent a tremendous effort in contacting club and personal archives. Throughout the century the energy and endurance of the pioneers are evident, perhaps most to those who have themselves tramped the approach miles, and sampled Cairngorm weather and terrain, even if they have never attempted the technical feats here described. The 12 main chapters cover the period in a balanced way, but the pride of place must go to the central chapters on 'The Golden Years' (1950-1960) in 56 pages, 'The Ice Revolution' (1970-1972) in 38 pages and 'The Quickening Pace' (1980-1985) in 58 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable CNPA Decision
    The Newsletter for the Cairngorms Campaign Enhancing the Conservation of the Cairngorms T HE CAIRNGORMS CAMPAIGNER Autumn 2011 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Appeal for Funding Support for the Campaign’s Legal Appeal Against the Cairngorms National Park Local Plan A Time to Challenge! Appeal for Funding 1-2 Support for the Why has a group of voluntary bodies findings, largely supported the views of Campaign’s Legal decided to take the Cairngorms National objectors to some important developments. Appeal Against the Park Authority (CNPA) to the Court of The sheer scale of housing developments Cairngorms Session in Edinburgh regarding the was a major concern: “---we conclude that National Park Local Plan Cairngorms National Park Local Plan? This that the rationale for the calculation of the housing requirement is unconvincing and the connection with housing land Action by the 3-4 requirement is not made sufficiently clearly” Campaign the reporters stated, in particular saying they could find no basis for a 50% allowance for second homes and vacant Talking Point 6-7,8 property in housing allocations. Wildness and the Cairngorms In Brief 5, 9 Around the 10 Cairngorms Book reviews 11 Cairngorm Stories 11-12 A red squirrel at Carrbridge one of the threatened sites is expensive and arduous. Voluntary organisations have to be driven to this. Something major must be amiss! The Local Plan for the National Park is a The Cairngorms Campaign key document guiding its sustainable The Blaeberry Bee – a threatened species on the UK postal address: development. It went through the stages of List of Priority Species and Habitats under threat under being drafted, submitted to public the UK Biodiversity Action Plan “Cairngorms Campaign, consultation, a public local plan inquiry and The proposal to build a new town, An PO Box 10037, Alford, the Park Authority’s response to the often Camas Mor initially, across the Spey from AB33 8WZ” strong criticisms and recommendations of Aviemore was particularly important.
    [Show full text]
  • A' Ghàidhlig Air Taobh an Ear Na H-Alba Gaelic on the East Coast Past
    A' GHÀIDHLIG AIR TAOBH AN EAR NA H-ALBA ♦ GAELIC ON THE EAST COAST PAST, PRESENT AND POSSIBLE FUTURES Dr. Duncan Sneddon, University of Aberdeen Prof. Michelle Macleod, University of Aberdeen A report commissioned by Aberdeen, Angus, Dundee City, Fife and Perth & Kinross Councils. Supported by Bòrd na Gàidhlig. 0 CONTENTS | CLÀR-INNSE Summary / Geàrr-Chunntas (Gàidhlig) 2 Summary / Geàrr-Chunntas (English) 3 Summary Geàrr-Chunntas (Scots) 4 Introduction / Ro-Ràdh 5 Abbreviations 9 1. Aberdeen City / Baile Obar Dheathain 10 2. Aberdeenshire / Siorrachd Obar Dheathain 30 3. Angus / Aonghas 45 4. Dundee / Dùn Dè 54 5. Fife / Fìobha 66 6. Perth & Kinross / Peairt & Ceann Rois 75 Conclusions / Co-Dhùnaidhean 95 Bibliography / Leabhar-Liosta 97 An t-Samhain / November 2020 1 A' Ghàidhlig air Taobh an Ear na h-Alba Geàrr-chunntas (Gàidhlig) Chaidh an rannschadh seo a dhèanamh leis an Oll. Donnchadh Sneddon agus an Àrd-Oll. Michelle NicLeòid, Oilthigh Obar Dhethain. Chaidh a maoineachadh le Bòrd na Gàidhlig, agus a h-iarradh le Comhairle Obar Dheathain, Comhairle Machair Aonghais, Comhairle Dhùn Deagh, Comhairle Fhìobha agus Comhairle Pheairt is Cheann Rois. B' e amas na pròiseict rannsachadh a dhèanamh air caochladh cuspairean co-cheangailte ris a' Ghàidhlig anns na sgìrean sin: a h-eachdraidh, a dìleab ann an ainmean-àite agus litreachas, coimhnearsnachdan na Gàidhlig gu eachdraidheil agus an latha an-diugh, polasaidhean gus a' chànan a leasachadh, buidhnean a tha an sàs sa Ghàidhlig air ìre na coimhnearsnachd agus fuasglaidhean airson leasachadh na Gàidhlig san àm ri teachd. Chaidh rannsachadh leabharlainn a dhèanamh, a' bharrachd air coinneamhan le luchd-labhairt ionadail sna sgìrean fa-leth, conaltradh le oifigearan anns na comhairleachan aig a bheil dleastanas airson na Gàidhlig agus daoine a tha an sàs ann an brosnachadh agus leasachadh na Gàidhlig aig ìre na coimhearsnachd.
    [Show full text]
  • Grouse News 38 Newsletter of the Grouse Group
    Grouse News 38 Newsletter of the Grouse Group RESEARCH REPORTS Inter-specific aggression between red grouse, ptarmigan and pheasant Adam Watson Fights or other aggressive encounters between grouse species or between grouse and pheasants have seldom been recorded. Below, I describe some encounters between red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus and ptarmigan Lagopus muta, and between red grouse and pheasants Phasianus colchicus. They throw light on inter-specific behaviour in relation to habitat. Red grouse and ptarmigan In Scotland, Gordon (1912) described red grouse and ptarmigan showing inter-specific aggression over patches of their food plant, ling Calluna vulgaris, in deep snow. When both species fed close together on days with deep snow in north-east Scotland, I reported occasional “brief disputes in which one bird avoids another or drives it from a patch of snow-free vegetation” (Watson 1972). These instances occurred when ptarmigan had left their usual alpine habitat above 760 m altitude and moved downhill into typical habitat for red grouse around 600–700 m, and when snow was not so deep as to cause the red grouse to leave. Most disputes were over small patches of ling projecting above the snow. Out of a total of 33 such encounters that I observed on upper moorland near Braemar in Aberdeenshire (excluding repeated encounters by the same individuals within the observation period), a cock red grouse displaced a cock ptarmigan in 20 cases, both cocks withdrew in three, and a cock ptarmigan displaced a cock red grouse in 10. This suggests a slight advantage to red grouse, but all encounters were in habitat typical for red grouse, though atypical for ptarmigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Baseline Study Of
    - itsonct INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY MERLEWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STUDY OF • DAMAGED GROUND AT CAIRNGORM ESTATE by Dr Adam Watson Moray Badenoch &Strathspey ENTERPRISE Highlands & Islands April 1994 ENTERPRISE á ENVIRONMENTALBASELINE STUDY OF DAMAGED GROUND AT CAIRNGORM ESTATE By Dr Adam Watson c/o Instituteof TerrestrialEcology, Banchory Produced for Highlands & Islands Enterprise, 1994 TITUTZEor Termmura.E-oacov EriATHEA'S 7 :1-1 ESMIE 4EY CONTENTS Page Summary 1 Introduction 1 2 Location and land designations 3 Backgroundand rationale 6 4 Chronologicalaccount of work done 8 5 Ground damaged naturally,without human impact 12 6 History of the ski developmentsand of resulting impacts 15 7 Locationsand methods for monitoringdamaged ground on the Estate 32 8 Results of 1991-93monitoringon the Estate 37 9 Results of 1990-93monitoringon the ski area 40 10 Natural recovery after human-induceddamage 41 11 Problem sites and recommendationsfor them 43 12 Future action plans 71 13 Acknowledgements 74 14 References 75 Appendix 1 Copy of Watson (1985) on soil erosion at Cairn Gorm 2 Dr G.R. Miller's notes on monitoringdamaged ground 3 Detailed descriptivenotes on paths 4 Inspectionand monitoringreports on the ski area, 1990- 93 5 Review of monitoring 6 List of monitoringproposals 7 Summary implementationtable 8 Detailed specificationsfor reducing damage 9 English and Latin names of species 10 Assessmentof snow lie for ground protection 11 Photographsshowing changes in problem sites and path repairs- 12 Detailed notes by Dr R. Aitken and Mr K. Wilson on path and ditch repair works 13 Grass reseedingmixture and areas treated in recent years SUMMARY This report presents the results of a study of damaged ground at Cairngorm Estate, based on field work in 1990-93.
    [Show full text]
  • 96444Tioaaaa44000aapoo[1:0DOODDEIDDI)
    Cn a) N tti a.) 4-1 a) ter CD Co Cn a) CO ci 0 0 O C cd Co Cn O 5 -6 o. a) ci a) Co O Fa Cn O la O Co a) Co Cd U o a) a) O 0 7-4 5 Co Co der Cn O H cu O O O o cd ci a <-4-1 b O cd Cn 5 Cd ci n Cd Cn .- 1co3' Co cd ti 0 0) b,0 -5 -o U 5 tw O co ;-1 O O 0 0 a.) a) 5 .4 0 a) Cd -o 0 Co Cn O C te .0 0 0 a) Cd Cn 5, Cn TJ 0 a) to o w -o o lexa 0 a) a) ll for co 5- a) -o C) -ct ci a) .4 nono .--0 Cd 5 k Cd a) a) Q.) 0.5 A O O O O a) CU 0 b0 U a) O 0 0 da s-I C.) "2" Cd Cn 0 -o cc 5 -50 7,5.cn__, Cn O wr co ci a) O Co c.) Co en , 0 0) 0.) Cn 0 0 at .444Cd a) -0 Co a) 5-4 t Cn lso Tow 44, a) a) i CU Co a) 5 TJ a) "TZ a) ca., 0 Cd Cd 0 45' CS Co O CO cd a) 0) .74 a a) Cn 1.4 ........ CY) Co 5 5-1 Cd :727 C/D O C ci a) a) O \.0 o 011, 54. 5.4 ci 5-4 CY\ -0 0 5-1 cd He -o 8 O 0 0 5 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report June 2006
    Cairngorms National Park consultative draft Local Plan CONSULTATION REPORT JUNE 2006 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 General Comments on Local Plan & Policies............................................................5 General Policies .......................................................................................................14 General Policy 1.......................................................................................................16 General Policy 2.......................................................................................................17 General Policy 3.......................................................................................................19 General Policy 4.......................................................................................................21 General Policy 5.......................................................................................................22 Policy 1 – Natura 2000 and Ramsar Sites................................................................24 Policy 2 – Protected Species....................................................................................25 Policy 3 - Biodiversity .............................................................................................26 Policy RM9 – Soil Conservation and Management.................................................27 Policy 4 - Landscape................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Our Website
    The Newsletter for the Cairngorms Campaign Enhancing the Conservation of the Cairngorms T HE CAIRNGORMS CAMPAIGNER Winter 2013 14 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: CAIRNGORMS NATURE ACTION PLAN 2013-2018 Cairngorms Nature 1-2 Action Plan 2013- 2018 Action by the 3-4 Campaign Book Reviews 5 Hill birds in north- east Highlands Mammals of north- east Highlands Photo Badenoch and Strathspey Conservation Group Conservation Strathspey and Photo Badenoch Birds in north-east Scotland – then and Aspen in full autumn colour. A species identified in the Plan as needing encouragement. now This is the Park Authority’s plan to reverse Measures like the creation of ponds or Points, sets and man biodiversity loss and indeed enhance reintroducing the pearl mussel to sites on biodiversity in the Park over the next six the River Avon are certainly achievable. Place Names in years although the document also sets out Other problems will need a harder look. The much of North-east Scotland a vision for how the Authority would like the plan for example emphasizes the Park to be in 50 years. It certainly states biodiversity value of the Park’s low ground, clearly its conservation value. but in Badenoch and Strathspey, it is the Authority’s own policy of extensive housing Talking Point 6-7,8 Quick Quote developments that is a major threat to that Rewilding the Old Nature Action Plan page 7 biodiversity. Caledonian Pine “—whilst the National Park covers less Forest A Growing Controversy than two percent of the UK’s landmass, it is home to a remarkable 25% of its threatened animal, insect, fungi and plant species.” In Brief 9,11 Around the 10- Almost half the Park’s area is designated Cairngorms under the Natura 2000 network to protect features or species of conservation interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sunlit Summit Additional Appendicies
    ONLINE APPENDICES TO THE SUNLIT SUMMIT These appendices can also be found on the website of Sandstone Press: www.sandstonepress.com. CONTENTS Introduction A A note on how climbs are graded in Britain – the grading systems for rock climbing and for winter snow and ice climbing. B The Campaign in the Western Desert 1940-42 – covering the period of Rommel’s main victories and Murray’s capture. C About Captain Herbert Buck – including his activities behind enemy lines and his daring escape. D Mountains and mysticism – a look at the possible causes of mystical experiences in mountains. E Further notes on the Perennial Philosophy, mysticism and meditation – as relevant to Murray’sbeliefs and the kind of meditation he practised. F Full text of Murray’s 1975 Presidential Address to the Mountaineering Council of Scotland - includes his views on access, preservation, mountain rescue and outdoor education. G Recipients of the Mungo Park Medal – an interesting list of explorers and adventurers. H Full text of John Randall’s Appreciation of The Islands of Western Scotland – John Randall, Cairman of the Islands Book Trust, discusses Murray’s book in the context of other books about the Western Isles. I Full text of the obituaries of W.H. Murray by (i) Robert Aitken; (ii) Robin Campbell – these two obituaries are the most comprehensive of the many obituaries which appeared. J An anthology of Murray’s special places – a list of places mentioned by Murray in his books, articles and other writings as having especially impressed him in some way. K Rocks and Realities: A Chronology of Murray’s Climbs 1935-45 by Michael Cocker – tells us when, where and with whom and provides a well-informed commentary.
    [Show full text]