DOCSLIB.ORG

Wild Plants As an Ecosystem Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wild Plants As an Ecosystem Service Wild plants as an ecosystem service: Contextualizing sustainability and socioeconomic Impact In rural Armenia Master thesis Miriam Rueger 620176 M.Sc. EnviroFood First examiner: Professor Dr. Claudia Bieling Institute for Societal Transition and Agriculture University of Hohenheim Second examiner: Alen Amirkhanian Acopian Center for the Environment American University of Armenia 10th June 2020 Abstract The relevance of ecosystem services has increased significantly over the past few years in scientific research. Armenia, as a biodiversity hotspot, provides great potential in this regard. This is especially true because ecosystem services are often not quantified and neglected in policy and decision-making processes there. Wild harvest is an activity that is widely acknowledged as an important benefit people obtain from natural ecosystems. However, it remains poorly researched and data availability is fairly limited. The aim of this study was to document wild harvest in rural Armenia and put it in the context of the ecosystem service framework. For that, a total of 23 structured interviews were conducted in four rural Armenian communities. Questions aimed to identify the most important wild plant species and their uses. Further, they tried to capture the sustainability of wild harvest and document a possible decline of biodiversity. Finally, the study intended to record the socioeconomic and cultural dimensions of wild harvest. The respondents listed a total of 68 species that they use for multiple purposes like medicine, cooking, spice, tea, preservation, and as ornamentals and it was consequently possible to capture the importance of wild harvest as a provisioning ecosystem service. However, the study was limited in documenting the overall sustainability of wild harvest and conclusions could only be drawn for specific species in certain communities. The sustainability of wild harvest is very context-specific and more detailed data is needed to fully capture whether wild harvest is sustainable or not in different locations. Lastly, the study was able to show a clear socioeconomic and cultural relevance of wild harvest. In the investigated communities, wild harvest is an important tool for people to uphold their traditions and strengthen their community bonds. Moreover, while the study only touched upon the economic dimension of wild harvest, it was still able to show that for some households wild plants are an important additional source of income. Overall, the research proofed the importance of wild harvest as an ecosystem service in rural Armenia. While the study captured wild harvest broadly based on many factors, some of these characteristics could be investigated more thoroughly with more specific objectives. More research is needed in Armenia to allow comprehensive decision-making for wild harvest regulations. For the research on ecosystem services, this study is a good example on how one activity can incorporate not just one ecosystem service but be embedded holistically in the overall concept. Acknowledgements First of all, I want to thank my two supervisors, Professor Dr. Claudia Bieling, director of the institute of Societal Transition and Agriculture at the University of Hohenheim and Alen Amirkhanian, director of the Acopian Center for the Environment (ACE) at the American University of Armenia (AUA). Thanks a lot to both of you for supervision and always taking the time to help me with any questions before, during and after my stay in Armenia. Next, I want to thank Anahit Amirkhanian for facilitating the field interviews and helping me to get a better understanding of Armenian culture than I would have on my own. Further, I thank Aghavni Harutyunyan for helping out with anything related to ArcGIS, creating maps for the field work and of the results, for translation of the questionnaire and helping out with field logistics. For project coordination and organization of field logistics I also want to thank Siranush Harutyunyan and Lilia Khzmalyan of the ACE and Julia Rietze from the University of Hohenheim. From the GIZ office in Yerevan, I want to thank Caroline Wegner and Artur Hayrapetyan for project coordination. Also, I want to thank Alla Aleksanyan from the Agrarian State University in Yerevan for helping with the correct botanical identification of the local plants. Lastly, I want to thank the DAAD for funding and enabling this project in the first place. Table of Contents List of figures ................................................................................................................................. i List of tables .................................................................................................................................. i Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Thematic background .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Knowledge gaps and research aims ......................................................................... 2 1.3. Research objectives .................................................................................................... 3 State of knowledge ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Ecosystem services ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Wild harvest .................................................................................................................. 5 2.2.1. Socioeconomic and cultural aspects of wild harvest ..................................... 7 2.2.2. Sustainable wild harvest .................................................................................... 8 2.3. Problems and degradation of ecosystem services ............................................... 10 Study area and communities ................................................................................................... 12 3.1. Republic of Armenia .................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1. Geography and natural diversity ..................................................................... 12 3.1.2. Agriculture and ecosystem degradation ........................................................ 14 3.1.3. Demographics, history and culture ................................................................. 14 3.2. Communities ............................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1. Aragatsotn marz – Kuchak and Geghadzor .................................................. 16 3.2.2. Gegharkunik marz – Kalavan and Dprabak .................................................. 17 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 19 4.1. Literature review ........................................................................................................ 19 4.2. Questionnaire ............................................................................................................. 20 4.3. Timing of research and data collection ................................................................... 21 4.4. Respondents .............................................................................................................. 22 4.5. Botanical inventory .................................................................................................... 22 4.6. Data analysis .............................................................................................................. 23 4.6.1. Data organization and adjustment .................................................................. 23 4.6.2. Statistical methods ............................................................................................ 25 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 26 5.1. General information ................................................................................................... 26 5.2. Harvested plants and their usage ........................................................................... 27 5.2.1. Plants listed ........................................................................................................ 27 5.2.2. Similarity indices ............................................................................................... 28 5.2.3. Generalized linear models for plant collection .............................................. 28 5.2.4. Purpose of plants .............................................................................................. 30 5.2.5. Parts used ............................................................................................................... 32 5.3. Harvesting techniques and changes ...................................................................... 33 5.3.1. Harvesting techniques ...................................................................................... 33 5.3.2. Changes in plant availability ............................................................................ 35 5.3.3. Spatial component ............................................................................................ 38 5.4. Socioeconomic relevance of wild harvest .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN ARMENIA 6th May 2012 European Elections monitor Republican Party led by the President of the Republic Serzh Sarkisian is the main favourite in Corinne Deloy the general elections in Armenia. On 23rd February last the Armenian authorities announced that the next general elections would Analysis take place on 6th May. Nine political parties are running: the five parties represented in the Natio- 1 month before nal Assembly, the only chamber in parliament comprising the Republican Party of Armenia (HHK), the poll Prosperous Armenia (BHK), the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (HHD), Rule of Law (Orinats Erkir, OEK) and Heritage (Z), which is standing in a coalition with the Free Democrats of Khachatur Kokobelian, as well as the Armenian National Congress (HAK), the Communist Party (HKK), the Democratic Party and the United Armenians. The Armenian government led by Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian (HHK) has comprised the Republi- can Party, Prosperous Armenia and Rule of Law since 21st March 2008. The Armenian Revolutionary Federation was a member of the government coalition until 2009 before leaving it because of its opposition to the government’s foreign policy. On 12th February last the Armenians elected their local representatives. The Republican Party led by President of the Republic Serzh Sarkisian won 33 of the 39 country’s towns. The opposition clai- med that there had been electoral fraud. The legislative campaign started on 8th April and will end on 4th May. 238 people working in Arme- nia’s embassies or consulates will be able to vote on 27th April and 1st May. The parties running Prosperous Armenia leader, Gagik Tsarukian will lead his The Republican Party will be led by the President of the party’s list.
    [Show full text]
  • ERENET PROFILE Issue
    ISSUE Vol. VII No. 1 January 2012 CONTENT ERENET PROFILE __________________________ WINTER MESSAGE 2 PAPERS PUBLISHER Dr. Péter Szirmai – Editor DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND Dr. Antal Szabó – Scientific Director SME-SECTORS IN SOUTH-EASTERN CAUCASUS: Ágnes Kiss – Website Editor Tamás Tóth – Designer Development of the SME Sector in the Era of 3 INTERNATIONAL BOARD Emerging from the Economic Crises in Armenia Desislava Yordanova AleksanderPoghossian-TigranSukiasyan 29 St. Kliment Ohridski University Development of the SME Sector in the Era of Dr. Sanja Pfeifer Emerging from the Economic Crises in Azerbaijan University of Osiek AlakbarMammadov Dr. Hans-Jürgen Weißbach Emerging out the Economic Crises and Strategies of 44 Fachhochschule Frankfurt am Main Entrepreneurship Improvement and SME Dr. Dumitru Matis Development in Georgia Babeş-Bolyai University EteriMamukelashvili Dr. Szabo Zsuzsanna University of Tirgu Mures Dr. Eric Dejan CONFERENCE PAPERS University of Belgrade • GlobalMicrocreditSummit2011concludedinSpain 61 Dr. Mateja Drnovsek • Dynamo-FirstNationalDayonBusinessContinuity 63 University of Ljubljana • RecognizingInnovativeSMEsinMalaysia 64 Dr. Toni Brunello Studiocentroveneto INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE Dr. Renáta Vokorokosová, University of Kosice • InternationalCouncilforSmallBusiness-ICSB Dr. Krzysztof Wach CALLS EVENTS Cracow University Dr. Sonia Heptonstall • GlobalBusinessIncubatorManagementTraining, 66 UBIS Geneva Istanbul 68 Dr. Sybille Heilbrunn • DoctoralCourceinEntrepreneurshipEducation, Ruppin Academic
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Armenia's Progress on the Tobacco Control Scale
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004410 on 27 February 2014. Downloaded from Measuring Armenia’s progress on the Tobacco Control Scale: an evaluation of tobacco control in an economy in transition, 2005–2009 Narine K Movsisyan,1 Gregory N Connolly2 To cite: Movsisyan NK, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Connolly GN. Measuring Objectives: This study aimed to measure the 5-year Armenia’s progress progress in the implementation of WHO Framework ▪ on the Tobacco Control The fist study to assess the Framework Convention Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in Armenia by Scale: an evaluation of on Tobacco Control (FCTC) implementation in tobacco control in an applying the Tobacco Control Scale, a rapid assessment Armenia. economy in transition, 2005– tool developed to assess the strength of tobacco control ▪ Applies the Tobacco Control Scale, an important 2009. BMJ Open 2014;4: policies in Europe. rapid assessment tool for measuring the strength e004410. doi:10.1136/ Setting: Armenia, an economy in transition, has extreme of tobacco control policies, to a transition country bmjopen-2013-004410 smoking rates among men (62.5%) despite acceding to such as Armenia, highlights the weaknesses of the FCTC in 2004. However, little research has been carried out scale and makes recommendations to enhance its ▸ Prepublication history and to evaluate Armenia’s progress in tobacco control. validity and reliability. additional material for this Methods: The Tobacco Control Scale total score was ▪ The findings from this study are limited to paper is available online. To estimated for Armenia using the original methodology; Armenia and similar economies in transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and Deportation of Azerbaijanis
    GENOCIDE AND DEPORTATION OF AZERBAIJANIS C O N T E N T S General information........................................................................................................................... 3 Resettlement of Armenians to Azerbaijani lands and its grave consequences ................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Iran ........................................................................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Turkey ................................................................................... 8 Massacre and deportation of Azerbaijanis at the beginning of the 20th century .......................... 10 The massacres of 1905-1906. ..................................................................................................... 10 General information ................................................................................................................... 10 Genocide of Moslem Turks through 1905-1906 in Karabagh ...................................................... 13 Genocide of 1918-1920 ............................................................................................................... 15 Genocide over Azerbaijani nation in March of 1918 ................................................................... 15 Massacres in Baku. March 1918................................................................................................. 20 Massacres in Erivan Province (1918-1920) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Armaments, Disarmament and International Security 472 NON-PROLIFERATION, ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT, 2007
    10. Conventional arms control ZDZISLAW LACHOWSKI I. Introduction There were many troubling developments for conventional arms control in 2007, although there was positive progress in some areas. In the biggest chal- lenge yet to the 1990 Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE Treaty) the Russian Federation ‘suspended’ its participation in the regime.1 This gave rise to more energetic consideration of the current status of conven- tional arms control in Europe. The weakening of the CFE arms control regime led to some disquieting reactions in the South Caucasus, while in Moldova the deadlock persisted over Russia’s removal of personnel and equipment. In contrast, there was further implementation of the 2005 Georgia–Russia agree- ment on the closure of Russian military bases and other facilities in Georgia and the subregional arms control regime in the Balkans continued to operate smoothly. Outside Europe, North and South Korea restarted talks in 2007 on building confidence on their mutual border.2 The states participating in the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) continued to develop confidence- and security-building meas- ures (CSBMs) and other arms control-related arrangements in 2007, with the aim of better meeting Europe’s regional and subregional risks and challenges. Globally, there was progress in dealing with ‘inhumane weapons’, and the international Oslo process on cluster munitions, which was launched in 2006, gained momentum. In reviewing these and other issues, this chapter assesses the major develop- ments relating to conventional arms control in 2007. Section II gives a brief overview of the gathering crisis over the CFE Treaty, an analysis of the crit- ical events during the year, the status of Russia’s commitments made in Istan- bul in 1999 and the impact of the crisis on low-intensity conflicts in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Wave of African Swine Fever Infection in Armenia: Virus Demonstrates the Reduction of Pathogenicity
    Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 RESEARCH ARTICLE Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/January-2018/2.pdf Open Access Third wave of African swine fever infection in Armenia: Virus demonstrates the reduction of pathogenicity M. A. Sargsyan1, H. E. Voskanyan2, E. M. Karalova2, L. H. Hakobyan2 and Z. A. Karalyan2,3 1. Department of Epizootiology and Parasitology, Armenian National Agrarian University, Yerevan 0009, Armenia; 2. Laboratory of Cell Biology and Virology, Institute of Molecular Biology of The National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia (NAS RA) , 7 Hasratyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia; 3. Department of Biology, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia. Corresponding author: Z. A. Karalyan, e-mail: [email protected] Co-authors: MAS: [email protected], HEV: [email protected], EMK: [email protected], LHH: [email protected] Received: 10-09-2017, Accepted: 05-12-2017, Published online: 11-01-2018 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.5-9 How to cite this article: Sargsyan MA, Voskanyan HE, Karalova EM, Hakobyan LH, Karalyan ZA (2018) Third wave of African swine fever infection in Armenia: Virus demonstrates the reduction of pathogenicity, Veterinary World, 11(1): 5-9. Abstract Aim: First cases of clinically uncommon African swine fever (ASF), caused by virus genotype II are described in this article. These cases occurred in Armenia, Tavush region, Dilijan municipality in 2011. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the new pathogenic forms of ASF in Armenia. Materials and Methods: The isolation and identification of ASF virus (ASFV) were carried out using conventional techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD COUNCIL of CHURCHES Armenia Round Table
    WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES Armenia Round Table ANNUAL REPORT 2006 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMME AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMME 2006 WCC Armenia Round Table World Council of Churches Monastery of Etchmiadzin WCC Diakonia & Solidarity Team - Europe Desk Tel: +374 (10) 517 157 150, Route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100, CH -1211 Geneva 2 Fax: +374 (10) 517 436 Tel: +41 22 791 6210 and 791 6209 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +41 22 788 0067 Web page: www.armwcc.org E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] ANNUAL REPORT Web page: www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/europe WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES ARMENIA ROUND TABLE CONTENTS Introductory remarks ...................................................................5 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMME ...................................................10 Christian Education and Social Diakonia ...............................12 Training Courses ....................................................................18 Teachers’ Training Programme and Social Service Centres ............................................................23 Participation in National Educational Policy Discussions and Policy Advocacy for Involvement of Churches in Education and Social Services .................................................27 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME .......................30 Promotion of Demonstration/ Monastery Farms ...................................................................32 Promotion of Sustainable Agricultural Development ..............36 Support of Locally Rooted Solutions with a Poverty
    [Show full text]
  • Հավելված N 1 Հհ Կառավարության 2011 Թվականի Մարտի 3-Ի N 220 - Ն Որոշման
    Հավելված N 1 ՀՀ կառավարության 2011 թվականի մարտի 3-ի N 220 - Ն որոշման Կ Ա Ր Գ ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ՀԱՆՐԱՊԵՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԱՇԽԱՐՀԱԳՐԱԿԱՆ ԱՆՎԱՆՈՒՄՆԵՐԻ ՌՈՒՍԵՐԵՆ ԵՎ ԱՆԳԼԵՐԵՆ ՏԱՌԱԴԱՐՁՈՒԹՅԱՆ I. ԸՆԴՀԱՆՈՒՐ ԴՐՈՒՅԹՆԵՐ 1. Սույն կարգով կանոնակարգվում են այն հիմնական դրույթները, որոնք անհրա- ժեշտ են մեկ միասնական համակարգում Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումների անգլերեն և ռուսերեն հրատարակման և օգտագործման ժամանակ։ 2. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվի համար մշակվել է մեկ մասնակի կարգ, որը հիմնականում անհրաժեշտ կլինի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումներով ռուսերեն և անգլերեն քարտեզներ, ատլասներ, գրական և տեղեկատվական նյութեր հրատարակելիս, ինչպես նաև ճանապարհային, վարչական շենքերի և այլ նպատակների համար նախատեսված ցուցանակներ տեղադրելիս։ 3. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվով անվանման ճիշտ ձևն ամրագրվում է` համադրելով մի քանի սկզբնաղբյուր։ 4. Հայերեն աշխարհագրական անվանումները պետք է տառադարձվեն այլ լեզուներով` հիմք ընդունելով տվյալ լեզվի արտահայտման առանձնահատկությունները, առավելագույնս մոտեցնելով դրանց գրելաձևերը հայերենի արտասանության հնչողությանը։ Առանձին դեպքերում ընդունված ավանդական գրելաձևերը հասցվել են նվազագույնի։ 5. Աշխարհագրական անվանումների տառադարձությունը, որպես կանոն, կատար- վում է հայերենի ժամանակակից գրելաձևից՝ հաստատված «Հայաստանի Հանրապետության վարչատարածքային բաժանման մասինե Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենքով և տերմի- 11_0220 2 նաբանական կոմիտեի 1956 թվականի սեպտեմբերի, 1958 թվականի փետրվարի և 1978 թվականի փետրվարի համապատասխան որոշումներով։ Հայերենի այն հնչյունները, որոնք չունեն ռուսերեն և անգլերեն համարժեքներ, տառադարձվում են հնարավորինս ավելի մոտ
    [Show full text]
  • THE STUDY on LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT in the REPUBLIC of ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V February 2006 KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., L
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA THE STUDY ON LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V SECTORAL REPORT – 1 - PRESENT CONDITIONS - February 2006 KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. THE STUDY ON LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V SECTORAL REPORT-1 - PRESENT CONDITIONS - Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1 NATURAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Topography ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Geology ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER-2 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM........................................................... 8 2.1 Legal System................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Policy, Budget, and Economy ...................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER-3 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 18 3.1 Purpose and Policy Of Study.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government of the Republic of Armenia
    E2203 Public Disclosure Authorized Government of the Republic of Armenia MCA-Armenia Team Proposal for Public Disclosure Authorized Millennium Challenge Account Assistance Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Assessment of the Concept Paper Public Disclosure Authorized September 2005 Government of the Republic of Armenia Proposal for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance Environmental Impact Assessment CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................3 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL ..........................................................4 2.1. Proposed Investment Areas.......................................................................4 2.2. Current Situation of Irrigation Infrastructure and Proposed Investments...4 2.3. Current Situation of Rural Roads and Proposed Investments.................36 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN ARMENIA...................50 3.1. Legal Framework......................................................................................50 3.2. International Agreements .........................................................................53 3.3. Institutional Framework ............................................................................57 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS....................................................................60 4.1. “No Action” Alternative .............................................................................61 4.2. Potential Positive Impacts ........................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Public Participation GIS for Mapping Land Use Patterns
    Working Paper Public Participation GIS for Mapping Land Use Patterns in Getik Valley, Armenia Aghavni Harutyunyan1, Pauline Pfeiffer2, Karen Vardanyan3, Marta Mamyan4 1 American University of Armenia (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment 2University of Hohenheim 3Yerevan State University Faculty of Law 4 American University of Armenia (AUA) Manoogian College of Business and Economics April 25, 2019 This project is a part of the DAAD-funded collaboration, GAtES (German-Armenian Network on the Advancement of Public Participation GIS for Ecosystem Services as a Means for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development), between the University of Hohenheim (UHOH) and the American University of Armenia’s (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment. 1.Introduction Throughout their lives, people receive benefits or services from the natural environment. These are known as ecosystem services, which are crucial for human life and well-being (Brown, 2012). However, overexploitation of them can lead to degradation (Ouko et al., 2018). We conducted a survey in Getik Valley, Armenia (Figure 1) to understand the benefits that communities receive from the natural environment, examine the distribution of ecosystem services, explore the existing relationships between ecosystem services and land use / land cover characteristics, as well as identify the problems connected to overuse of these resources. It is also important to increase the interest of local communities in biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation. The Internet-based PPGIS system (Maptionnaire) was used to evaluate and identify ecosystem services mainly provided by forest in Getik Valley, Armenia. PPGIS is a part of broader public participation process that can use survey research methods to incorporate human–computer interaction (Brown et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]