DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Defense Appropriations for 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Defense Appropriations for 2010 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2010 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE JOHN P. MURTHA, Pennsylvania, Chairman NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia TODD TIAHRT, Kansas MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio JACK KINGSTON, Georgia ALLEN BOYD, Florida KAY GRANGER, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York CAROLYN C. KILPATRICK, Michigan NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Obey, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Lewis, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. PAUL JUOLA, GREG LANKLER, SARAH YOUNG, LINDA PAGELSEN, PAUL TERRY, KRIS MALLARD, ADAM HARRIS, ANN REESE, BROOKE BOYER, TIM PRINCE, MATT WASHINGTON, B G WRIGHT, CHRIS WHITE, CELES HUGHES, and ADRIENNE RAMSAY, Staff Assistants SHERRY L. YOUNG, Administrative Aide PART 2 Page Marine Corps Ground Equipment ....................................... 1 Soldier Equipment, Ergonomics and Injuries .................. 47 Army and Marine Corps Readiness .................................... 139 Army and Marine Corps Force Protection ....................... 191 Air Force Military Personnel ................................................ 281 Military Personnel—Army ..................................................... 367 Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:43 May 21, 2010 Jkt 056260 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7513 Sfmt 7513 E:\HR\OC\56260P1.XXX 56260P1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING PART 2—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2010 VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:43 May 21, 2010 Jkt 056260 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\56260P1.XXX 56260P1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING with DSKD5P82C1PROD on sroberts DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2010 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE JOHN P. MURTHA, Pennsylvania, Chairman NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana DAVID L. HOBSON, Ohio JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TODD TIAHRT, Kansas ROBERT E. ‘‘BUD’’ CRAMER, JR., Alabama ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi ALLEN BOYD, Florida JACK KINGSTON, Georgia STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Obey, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Lewis, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. PAUL JUOLA, GREG LANKLER, SARAH YOUNG, LINDA PAGELSEN, PAUL TERRY, KRIS MALLARD, ADAM HARRIS, ANN REESE, BROOKE BOYER, TIM PRINCE, MATT WASHINGTON, B G WRIGHT, CHRIS WHITE, CELES HUGHES, and ADRIENNE RAMSAY, Staff Assistants SHERRY L. YOUNG, Administrative Aide PART 2 Page Marine Corps Ground Equipment ....................................... 1 Soldier Equipment, Ergonomics and Injuries .................. 47 Army and Marine Corps Readiness .................................... 139 Army and Marine Corps Force Protection ....................... 191 Air Force Military Personnel ................................................ 281 Military Personnel—Army ..................................................... 367 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 56–260 WASHINGTON : 2010 VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:43 May 21, 2010 Jkt 056260 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7513 Sfmt 7513 E:\HR\OC\56260P1.XXX 56260P1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS DAVID R. OBEY, Wisconsin, Chairman NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington JERRY LEWIS, California ALAN B. MOLLOHAN, West Virginia C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia NITA M. LOWEY, New York JACK KINGSTON, Georgia JOSE´ E. SERRANO, New York RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New ROSA L. DELAURO, Connecticut Jersey JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia TODD TIAHRT, Kansas JOHN W. OLVER, Massachusetts ZACH WAMP, Tennessee ED PASTOR, Arizona TOM LATHAM, Iowa DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama CHET EDWARDS, Texas JO ANN EMERSON, Missouri PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island KAY GRANGER, Texas MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California JOHN ABNEY CULBERSON, Texas SAM FARR, California MARK STEVEN KIRK, Illinois JESSE L. JACKSON, JR., Illinois ANDER CRENSHAW, Florida CAROLYN C. KILPATRICK, Michigan DENNIS R. REHBERG, Montana ALLEN BOYD, Florida JOHN R. CARTER, Texas CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania RODNEY ALEXANDER, Louisiana STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey KEN CALVERT, California SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia JO BONNER, Alabama MARION BERRY, Arkansas STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio BARBARA LEE, California TOM COLE, Oklahoma ADAM SCHIFF, California MICHAEL HONDA, California BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota STEVE ISRAEL, New York TIM RYAN, Ohio C.A. ‘‘DUTCH’’ RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida CIRO RODRIGUEZ, Texas LINCOLN DAVIS, Tennessee JOHN T. SALAZAR, Colorado PATRICK J. MURPHY, Pennsylvania BEVERLY PHETO, Clerk and Staff Director (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:43 May 21, 2010 Jkt 056260 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7513 Sfmt 7513 E:\HR\OC\56260P1.XXX 56260P1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2010 TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2009. MARINE CORPS GROUND EQUIPMENT WITNESS LIEUTENANT GENERAL GEORGE J. FLYNN, DEPUTY COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS, COMBAT DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION MR. MURTHA’S OPENING STATEMENT Mr. MURTHA. The committee will come to order. I want us out of here by 11:00, General. I hope your answers won’t be too long. The thing that I wanted to talk about mainly is the cost of the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) and how you are going to get this program under control. We spent $4 billion up to this date, and you just took over the program, but we need to have some recommendation from you for the subcommittee so that we will be able to follow this program more closely. We keep putting money into research, and we keep finding you need more and more money. You save money by cutting down on the numbers, but I am not sure how much research you are saving. But the money you have asked for this year—we have got to know as you go along exactly where we are so that we can cut the thing off, we can come to an agreement to cut this thing off, because you have got a lot of good programs, and usually you run those programs very well, but I am just worried about this par- ticular program. It started when I was Chairman before. I went to see it down at Dumfries, and it looked like it was going to be a program we need- ed. We have done very few amphibious operations under duress, and I believe the Marine Corps needs a capability of landing against a threat. But having said that, we have got to get this program under con- trol. It is just so expensive, and when I went back and looked, I had the staff go back and find the World War I—you see this, Bill, a World War I tank. Bill, see this World War I tank? It looks like their EFV. Mr. YOUNG. They used a lot of imagination. Mr. MURTHA. Yeah. This is today’s vehicle, and that one probably costs less than $1,000 apiece. But at any rate, we look forward to hearing your testimony, and I will see if Mr. Young has any com- ments. (1) VerDate Mar 15 2010 22:11 May 21, 2010 Jkt 056260 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 E:\HR\OC\A260P2.XXX A260P2 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING 2 OPENING STATEMENT BY MR. YOUNG Mr. YOUNG. Mr. Chairman, thank you very much. And I want to welcome the general to be here this morning. Having the Marines able to move lightly and quickly, I think, is extremely important. And probably we have seen in Iraq the Ma- rines have gotten a little heavier. And I know that in some con- versations and meetings, the case was made for a faster, lighter ve- hicle that would be more secure and more effective. So, General, we are just anxious to hear what you have to tell us about that, be- cause I think we all want to provide whatever it is the Marine Corps needs to be an effective fighting force, which the Marines have always been. Mr. MURTHA. General, summarize your statement. We will put the full statement in the record, without objection. General FLYNN. I understand, sir. SUMMARY STATEMENT OF GENERAL FLYNN General FLYNN. Mr. Chairman, Congressman Young and mem- bers of the committee, it is an honor and a privilege to appear be- fore you today. We share a common passion, and that is that all of us are com- mitted to providing the men and women in uniform the best leader- ship, training, equipment, family support and quality of life pos- sible. With this in mind, I am prepared to discuss your Marine Corps’ ground equipment requirements today. Our requirements are the results of detailed and a disciplined process that is informed by several things: first of, all our legisla- tive roles and missions in Title 10; the guidance we received from the Secretary of Defense; the Commandant’s guidance, to include the core competencies contained in our recently published Vision and Strategy; the combatant commanders’ needs; and also require- ments that are generated from the bottom up by our warfighters. Additionally, as the Nation’s expeditionary force in readiness, we must also consider the need for both amphibious and land-based operations, and the requirement for a balance in capability across the range of military operations that we are likely to see so that we can gauge in everything from presence to crisis response to con- ventional operations. Our requirements must be able to respond to threats we see today while guarding against surprise in the future. It is my belief that our ground requirements reflect the balance that is needed for the current threat and any potential threats in the future by our Nation from your Marine Corps.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Read Article As
    He can see through walls, His Helmet is video-connected, and His rifle Has computer precision. We cHeck out tHe science (and explosive poWer) beHind tHe technology tHat’s making tHe future of the military into Halo come to life. by StinSon Carter illustration by kai lim want the soldier to think of himself as the $6 battalions. Today we fight with Small Tactical Units. Million Man,” says Colonel Douglas Tamilio, And the heart of the Small Tactical Unit is the single project manager of Soldier Weapons for the U.S. dismounted soldier. Army. In case you haven’t heard, the future of In Afghanistan, as in the combat zones of the fore­ warfare belongs to the soldier. The Civil War was fought seeable future, we will fight against highly mobile, by armies. World War II was fought by divisions. Viet­ highly adaptive enemies that blend seamlessly into nam was fought by platoons. Operation Desert Storm their environments, whether that’s a boulder­strewn was fought by brigades and the second Iraq war by mountainside or the densely populated urban jungle. enhanced coMbaT heLMeT Made from advanced plastics rather than Kevlar, the new ECH offers 35 percent more protection GeneraTion ii than current helmets. heLMeT SenSor The Gen II HS provides the wearer with analysis of explosions and any neTT Warrior other potential source This system is designed to provide of head trauma. vastly increased situational awareness on the battlefield, allowing combat leaders to track the locations and health ModuLar of their teams, who are viewing tactical LiGhTWeiGhT information via helmet-mounted Load-carryinG computer screens.
    [Show full text]
  • NCO Journal October 05.Pmd
    VOL: 14, ISSUE: 4 OCT 2005 A QUARTERLY FORUM FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Soldiers in a Humvee search for people wishing to be rescued from Hurricane Katrina floodwaters in downtown New Orleans. Photo courtesy of www.army.mil. by Staff Sgt. Jacob N. Bailey INSIDE“ ON POINT 2-3 SMA COMMENTS IRAQI CULTURE: PRICELESS Tell the Army story with pride. They say “When in Rome, do 4-7 NEWS U CAN USE as the Romans.” But what do you know about Iraqi culture? The Army is doing its best to LEADERSHIP ensure Soldiers know how to “ manuever as better ambassa- dors in Iraq. DIVORCE: DOMESTIC ENEMY Staff Sgt. Krishna M. Gamble 18-23 National media has covered it, researchers have studied it and the sad fact is Soldiers are ON THE COVER: living it. What can you as Spc. Eric an NCO do to help? Przybylski, U.S. Dave Crozier 8-11 Army Pacific Command Soldier of the Year, evaluates NCO AND SOLDIER OF THE YEAR a casualty while he Each year the Army’s best himself is evaluated NCOs and Soldiers gather to during the 2005 NCO compete for the title. Find out and Soldier of the who the competitors are and Year competition more about the event that held at Fort Lee, Va. PHOTO BY: Dave Crozier embodies the Warrior Ethos. Sgt. Maj. Lisa Hunter 12-17 TRAINING“ ALIBIS NCO NET 24-27 LETTERS It’s not a hammer, but it can Is Detriot a terrorist haven? Is Bart fit perfectly in a leader’s Simpson a PsyOps operative? What’s toolbox.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Armed Body Armor Update by Scott R
    Soldier Armed Body Armor Update By Scott R. Gourley In a June 2006 statement before the dier Survivability with the Office of House Armed Services Committee, Program Executive Office Soldier, the mong the most significant recent then-Maj. Gen. Stephen M. Speakes, latest system improvements inte- Adevelopments that directly in- who was director, Force Development, grated into the new improved outer crease warfighter safety and effective- Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8, tactical vest, as with earlier advances, ness are the enhancements to the pro- offered a brief chronology of the IBA reflect additional feedback from sol- tective ensemble known as Interceptor program, which highlighted the link- diers in the field. body armor (IBA). As the most up-to- age between that program’s evolution “We receive that feedback in differ- date body armor available, IBA is a and warfighter feedback. ent ways,” Myles explained. “One way, modular body armor system that con- I 1999—The Army started fielding for example, was through a soldier pro- sists of an outer vest, ballistic plates the OTV with small arms protective tection demonstration that we con- and attachments that increase the areas inserts (SAPI) to soldiers deployed in ducted in August 2006 at Fort Benning, of coverage. The system increases sol- Bosnia. Ga. We had industry provide us some dier survivability by stopping or slow- I April 2004—Theater reported 100 body armor for soldiers to evaluate. ing bullets and fragments and reducing percent fill of 201,000 sets of IBA (OTV These were soldiers that had just re- the number and severity of wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Combat Helmets and Blast Traumatic Brain Injury
    Review Articles Combat Helmets and Blast Traumatic Brain Injury Duncan Wallace, FRANZCP and Stephen Rayner, DPsych (Clinical) Abstract: Background: The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and the prominence of traumatic brain injury (TBI), mostly from improvised explosive devices, have focused attention on the effectiveness of combat helmets. Purpose: This paper examines the importance of TBI, the role and history of the development of combat helmets, current helmet designs and effectiveness, helmet design methodology, helmet sensors, future research and recommendations. Method: A literature review was conducted using search terms – combat helmets, traumatic brain injury, concussion, Iraq, Afghanistan and helmet sensors, searching PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest and Google Scholar. Conclusions: At present, no existing helmet is able to fully protect against all threats faced on the battlefield. The prominence of traumatic brain injury from improvised explosive devices in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has highlighted the limitations in knowledge about blast and how to provide protection from it. As a result, considerable research is currently occurring in how to protect the head from blast over-pressure. Helmet sensors may provide valuable data. Some new combat helmets may be able to protect against rifle rounds, but may result in injuries occurring behind body armour. Optimal combat helmet design requires a balance between the need for protection from trauma and the comfort and practicality of the helmet for the user to ensure the best outcomes. Keywords: combat helmets, traumatic brain injury, concussion, Iraq, Afghanistan. No conflicts of interest were identified by the authors. Introduction Role and history of combat helmets Recent adverse media attention about combat The primary role of the combat helmet is to protect helmets used in Afghanistan by United States the soldier’s head against injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Ti for Military Ground Vehicles: Are Hopes Dashed?
    Ti for Military Ground Vehicles: Are Hopes Dashed? International Titanium Association San Diego, October 2011 T. James Dorsch BAE Systems Land and Armaments Santa Clara, CA 10/5/2011 ApprovedApproved forfor Public Public Release, Release, Distribution Distribution Unlimited, Unlimited, BAE BAE Systems Systems Communications Communications Department, Department, September September 2011 2011 1 Outline . Advantages of titanium for armor . Why the lack of titanium applications in ground combat vehicles . Current applications . Future defense challenges . General difficulty in adopting new materials . Improved fuel economy to reduce convoys and related casualties . Future vehicles – new and upgrade programs . New technologies . Opportunities 10/5/2011 Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, BAE Systems Communications Department, September 2011 2 One of the world’s largest defense companies Defense News Top 100 BAE Systems plc Based on 2008 Revenues ($B) 45 . 107,000 employees 40 . 2009 sales of £22.4B ($35.1B**) 35 . 2009 order book of $73.4B** 30 25 . Second largest global defense company 20 . Top 10 U.S. prime contractor 15 . Seven home nations 10 5 . Presence in more than 100 nations 0 Lockheed BAE Boeing Northrop General Raytheon EADS Martin Systems Grumman Dynamics BAE Systems, Inc. 52,000 employees BAE Systems Sales from 2002 – 2009 (Figures in £000s) (44,000 in the U.S.) 25,000 . 2009 sales of £12.4B ($19.4B**) 20,000 . Major operations in 38 states, the UK, Sweden, Israel, Germany, Mexico, 15,000 Switzerland, and South
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan 2017
    2017 PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan | i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2017 PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan | ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER LAND SYSTEMS MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT PLAN 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Executive Summary ii. Bottom Line Up Front iii. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction pg. 1 2.0 S&T Collaboration and Engagement pg. 5 3.0 Futures pg. 17 4.0 Top Technical Issues pg. 29 5.0 PEO LS S&T Focus Areas pg. 31 5.1 Power and Energy pg. 33 5.1.1 Fuel Efficiency pg. 33 5.1.2 Intelligent Power and Thermal Management pg. 36 5.2 Survivability and Mobility pg. 41 5.2.1 Survivability pg. 41 5.2.1.1 Fuel Containment/Fire Suppression pg. 45 5.2.1.2 Safety pg. 45 5.2.2 Mobility pg. 46 5.2.2.1 Crew Visibility pg. 47 5.2.2.2 Corrosion pg. 48 5.2.2.3 Autonomy pg. 48 5.2.2.4 Weight Reduction pg. 51 5.3 Modeling and Simulation pg. 59 5.4 Open Plug-and-Play Communication Architecture pg. 65 6.0 Warfare Centers pg. 71 7.0 MCWL/DARPA Efforts pg.9 8 8.0 PEO LS Programs pg.7 9 8.1 Assault Amphibious Vehicle pg. 101 8.2 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 Increment 1 pg. 109 8.3 Common Aviation Command and Control System pg. 117 8.4 Ground Based Air Defense pg. 125 8.5 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier and Marine Equipment for Dismounted Operations
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–27] SOLDIER AND MARINE EQUIPMENT FOR DISMOUNTED OPERATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD MARCH 17, 2011 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65–594 WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland, Chairman FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey SILVESTRE REYES, Texas JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina TOM ROONEY, Florida JIM COOPER, Tennessee TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts JON RUNYAN, New Jersey LARRY KISSELL, North Carolina MARTHA ROBY, Alabama MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina BILL OWENS, New York W. TODD AKIN, Missouri JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California JOE WILSON, South Carolina MARK S. CRITZ, Pennsylvania MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio KATHY CASTOR, Florida BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JESSE TOLLESON, Professional Staff Member DOUG BUSH, Professional Staff Member SCOTT BOUSUM, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2011 Page HEARING: Thursday, March 17, 2011, Soldier and Marine Equipment for Dismounted Operations ............................................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX: Thursday, March 17, 2011 ...................................................................................... 33 THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 2011 SOLDIER AND MARINE EQUIPMENT FOR DISMOUNTED OPERATIONS STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Bartlett, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Kdh Defense Systems Catalogs Contract Award 12Psx0315
    Kdh defense systems Catalogs Contract award 12psx0315 AMERICAN-MADE CUSTOM BODY ARMOR SOLUTIONS Military • Law Enforcement • Corrections • International REDEFINING PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE America's cops put their lives on the line each and every day -- and that’s why the pursuit of excellence is so important to us at KDH Defense Systems. KDH is in the business of saving the lives of not only America's cops, but also its federal agents, soldiers, marines and special operations warriors. TABLE OF CONTENTS Since 2003, the mission of KDH has been to give its customers the best possible, quality armor solutions no matter what - accepting nothing less than perfection. About KDH Defense Systems, Inc. 2 First Responder Plate Carrier (FRPC) 26 The investment that KDH makes in research and development, testing and Ballistic Systems 4 KDHS 27 evaluation results in unique, innovative trend setting solutions that Law Enforcement Concealable Body Armor 6 Tactical Accessories: Pouches | ID | Blankets 28 Mobile Defense Shield ultimately become the industry standard. You have my personal guarantee Transformer Armor System 7 29 Hard Armor Plates that our products will consistently exceed your expectations. Elite 10 30 Valor 11 Helmets 33 CLK Female Concealable Vest 12 Military Body Armor 34 At KDH, we don't just design and build body armor, we redefine perfor- Sleek 14 USMC Improved Modular Tactical Vest (IMTV) mance excellence and push the limits of what's possible, ensuring that the 36 Uniform Shirt Carrier (USC) 15 USMC Plate Carrier 37 vest you wear is stronger, lighter and more comfortable - and one day, may Outer Patrol Carrier (OPC) 16 Soldier Plate Carrier System (SPCS) 38 even save your life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballistic Helmets – Their Design, Materials, and Performance Against Traumatic Brain Injury
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Research U.S. Department of Defense 2013 Ballistic helmets – Their design, materials, and performance against traumatic brain injury S.G. Kulkarni Texas A&M University, [email protected] X.-L. Gao University of Texas at Dallas, [email protected] S.E. Horner U.S. Army, Fort Belvoir J.Q. Zheng U.S. Army, Fort Belvoir N.V. David Universiti Teknologi MARA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyresearch Kulkarni, S.G.; Gao, X.-L.; Horner, S.E.; Zheng, J.Q.; and David, N.V., "Ballistic helmets – Their design, materials, and performance against traumatic brain injury" (2013). US Army Research. 201. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyresearch/201 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Composite Structures 101 (2013) 313–331 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Composite Structures journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct Review Ballistic helmets – Their design, materials, and performance against traumatic brain injury ⇑ S.G. Kulkarni a, X.-L. Gao b, , S.E. Horner c, J.Q. Zheng c, N.V. David d a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States b Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States c Program Executive Office – SOLDIER, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Blank Body Armor Prices
    Point Blank Body Armor Prices Descending Sinclare betiding deviously while Saxon always transuded his Trevithick sharpen maybe, he noses so afternoons. Billowiest Kenn sometimes bludging any salesperson brining fivefold. Strigiform and chelate Osborne misspoken almost outboard, though Sylvester misadvises his interspersion miniaturizes. Interceptor Point Blank Body Armor with Kevlar Inserts Medium M in great condition. What they do instead is instantly harden upon impact, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties and engaged in fraud, we will stand behind the products we sell. The Contracts Resource Center is here to help. SAPI: The top corners are clipped down. Brooks, any soft ballistic component having a manufacturing or material defect, we will not proceed with such transaction unless approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Justice department contact point blank body armor prices. We use no derivative products to hedge or mitigate interest rate risk. You just have to remember that like it says in this article it is not the super high end crazy expensive stuff. In Arizona it is prohibited for convicted felons to own body armor. We do not believe that we will be required to discharge the liability of former senior management personnel for income tax withholding obligations. MBE and WBE firms available to perform the service or provide the supplies or materials. Safariland designs their ballistic panel with comfort and ergonomics in mind. Delaware In Delaware it is prohibited for convicted felons to own body armor. Pompano Beach, wolf grey, Inc. Maryland A convicted felon may not own body armor. This action cannot be undone. Our business will be adversely affected if we are not able to continue to develop new and competitive products.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of MANPRINT-Related Assessments and Evaluations Conducted by the U.S
    An Annotated Bibliography of MANPRINT-Related Assessments and Evaluations Conducted by the U.S. Army, 2nd Edition: 1953 to 2009 Volume III – Test and Evaluation Reports by Sam E. Middlebrooks, Ph.D. ARL-SR-190 February 2010 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOTICES Disclaimers The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. Citation of manufacturer’s or trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use thereof. Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425 ARL-SR-190 February 2010 An Annotated Bibliography of MANPRINT-Related Assessments and Evaluations Conducted by the U.S. Army, 2nd Edition: 1953 to 2009 Volume III –Test and Evaluation Reports Sam E. Middlebrooks, Ph.D. Human Research and Engineering Directorate, ARL Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]