DOCSLIB.ORG

Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 Ian Douglas, B.Sc ian@ zti.co.za 16 January 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4410650Version 1.1.0 DOI: This wor! is license" under t#e Creati%e Co&&ons Attri(ution 4.0 International License. +nqi": )-a521/-)06)e0c16))11./6a2a0e6(c 2lease c#ec! via DOI for latest version. Abstract ' mathe&atics course fro& t#e Ze4 Te4i era, w#ere we plan an" analyse a large buil"ing site, s#o ing ho the design mirrors the stars. ' si&4le and elegant e64lanation o/ ho Giza, wit# si6 main pyrami"s, was lai" out, using √2, 81, √5, π and φ. The design incor4orates t#e necessary ele&ents for s,uaring t#e circle, area- ise. The design matc#es the hea%ens around 5...! B$E. This coul" force a ret#ink o/ at least t#e #istory o/ mathe&atics, i/ not the broader hu&an ti&eline, an" effecti%ely sol%es the puzzle o/ #o Giza was lai" out. >ey or"s: Egy4tology, 7iza, pyrami"s, alignment, geo&etry, arc#aeogeo&etry, arc#aeoastrono&y, history o/ mat#e&atics, π, pi, φ, gol"en ratio, s,uaring the circle. Best vie e" and printe" in colour. 1 Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Notation, accurac and methodology !. The p ramids and their locations ". Module 1# The Thoth Grid %. Module 2# Thoth’s La(, or The s)uare on the h potenuse... *. Module 3# Di+iding space in a gi+en ratio ,. Module 4# The s-eleton blueprint .. Module 5# The big triangle /. Module 6# S)uaring the circle 10. Module ,# A map o1 Khu1u3 11. Conclusion 12. Ac-no(ledgements 1!. Bibliography 1". Gizactor version 3 Updates# 1.1.0 Re-arranged discussion of P1 base size, e:panded discussion of 21"!, e:panded discussion about the big triangle and put it in its o(n section. Added “Map of Khu1u3< section. Assorted other bug-=i:es and embellishments. 2 Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 1. Introduction ?The language o/ Giza is mat#e&atics.@ Ao(ert Bau%al ?Bou will belie%e.@ The arc#itects o/ Giza 5#is is my fiD# an" a hal/ atte&4t at writing this since early 2020, eac# ti&e starting at a di=erent 4oint an" follo ing a different path. As with t#e rest o/ my e64lorations o/ Giza, it has been a cyclical process, one thing leading to another, forcing re%isions and reCine&ents. It feels li!e I #a%e been gui"e" along li!e a c#il" learning science, w#ere w#at t#ey teac# you in junior sc#ool is “correcte"” in high sc#ool, an" then again at uni%ersity le%el. So w#at starte" o= innocently as a quest to see i/ Giza was hi"ing any circles di%i"e" in t#e gol"en ratio has no progresse" to a goo" understan"ing o/ e6actly ho t#e site was lai" out. The design presente" here largely su4erse"es the met#o"s presente" in my earlier paper. The "esign is elegant and de&onstrates undeniable kno le"ge o/ π, φ, an" s,uare roots. The final sur4rise is t#at the design inclu"es s,uaring the circle area; ise, not peri&eter; ise as in K#u/u. There are also nu&erous mat#e&atical “tric!s” or “jo!es” along t#e way. 's suc#, Giza re rites the history o/ mathe&atics, and we nee" to sto4 gi%ing t#e Gree!s cre"it for things that originate" in Egy4t. This paper is a continuation o/ my pre%ious efforts, Dis!er/ery and the Alignment o/ the Four Gain Giza Pyrami"s (Douglas 201- I1JK H#ence/ort# Dis!er/eryK and 5.,..0 B$E and the 21 Stars o/ Giza (Douglas 201- I2JK H#ence/orth ..>K. The first atte&4te" to deter&ine the location o/ the /ourth pyrami", as docu&ente" by Nor"en I1J, w#ile t#e second s#o e" a stellar alignment around 5...! B$E. This docu&ent intro"uces t#e fiD# an" si6th pyrami"s, long de&olis#e", for w#ic# we currently #a%e no conventional e%i"ence. Ho e%er, t#e stellar alignment strongly suggests t#eir presence. Once we a"" the& to t#e layout map, multi4le fascinating mathe&atical relations#i4s sur/ace, #ic# can not be by c#ance. The relations#i4s s#o ad%ance" (co&4are" to w#at we think t#ey !ne K mathe&atical kno le"ge. Thus, I a& convince" t#ey were t#ere. N#en we analyse t#e layout at Giza, we ha%e to o%erco&e these o(stacles: 1. We are dealing with “as is@, w#ic# is not t#e same as “as reno%ate"” (&ulti4le ti&esO I)JK, #ic# is not t#e sa&e as “as built”, w#ic# is not the same as “as designe".@ 2. As discusse" in a pre%ious paper (....!K, I ha%e co&e to t#e conclusion that Giza was built around 5...! B$E. This is a pro(le&atic date, but it’s w#en t#e star map be#ind t#e design aligns. Figure 1 s#o s ho e6tant Giza aligns with t#e stars around 5...! B$E. Giza ele&ents are in green, w#ile stars an" labels are re", blue and blac!. The “+” sign is t#e celestial nort# pole. 1 Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 >igure 1# Ho( the right hand side o1 Giza aligns with the stars, 5%.%- BC@ This s#o s fi%e pyrami"s, and Thu(an’s or(it around P.. Thu(an was t#e pole star at t#e ti&e. '4art fro& t#e fi%e pyrami"s, I will also s#o ho Cor Caroli, Koc#a(, Du(#e, and P#ec"a 4ositions are mat#e&atically relate" to t#e pyrami"s. They are s#o n as green dots. I don’t kno i/ anyt#ing was built there. Koc#ab in Ursa Minor is actually off the Giza plateau at the mo&ent, (ut it may still have been plateau w#en Giza was built. Koc#ab is close to t#e current entrance to the Ca%e o/ Bir"s. ) Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 S#o ing t#e alignment for si6 pyrami"s is diRicult, because t#e stars invol%e" s4an across more than hal/ the s!y, w#ic# creates pro(le&s trying to map t#e cur%e" s!y to a flat screen or page. The constellations distort differently, de4ending on w#ic# proEection you use. Here are t o atte&4te" alignments using the same s!y and date, just projecte" differently. This is the Mam&er;'itoff projection, with a 101..S fiel" o/ vie , at Cairo on 21 Marc#, 5...! B$E. >igure 2# Giza stellar alignment, HAI projection Mere is the AA$ Zenithal e,ui"istant projection version, wit# the same fiel" o/ vie . Zep Tepi Mathematics 101 I Douglas 2021 >igure !# Giza stellar alignment, ARC projection t# 1. In the years between being built, an" the 4 dynasty, I woul" i&agine that t#e pyra&i"s su=ere" a lot o/ da&age. I inter4ret “K#u/uPs Horizon” as the proEect initiate" by K#u/u, and co&4lete" by K#afre and Menkaure, to “reno%ate and restore” w#at was leD. In t#e process they cleare"t# t#et# area west o/ P2, creating t#e “horizon.” I s4eculate t#at t#ey too! w#at was leD o/ the . and 6 pyrami"s, and possi(ly Dje"e/rePs, and use" t#at to re(uil" t#e other four pyrami"s, s#i44ing in Tura li&estone for the final layer. K#u/u may have had to re(uil" the to4 thir" o/ his 4yrami", fro& t#e area abo%e the granite slabs. Starting fro& there coul" e64lain the graffiti, a twenty year ti&e s4an, and the o"" c#anges in course t#ic!ness. ). Ju"ging by t#e mat#e&atics, MenkaurePs re(uil"ing resulte" in the footprint mo%ing slightly south an" west, and possi(ly re;centring t#e entire pyrami". Legon’s triangle I.J actually ends insi"e t#e pyrami", so I t#ink Menkaure was "ifferently size" to no . .. A/rica has rotate" slightly since 5T..! years ago. This twist, along with MenkaurePs 4ro(le&atic reno%ations, #as co&4licate" any analysis o/ the site. 6. I/ my s4eculation in (1K is correct, t#en having pyrami"s 4, 5 and 6 missing, has also co&4licate" any analysis o/ t#e site. At least we ha%e Nor"en’s docu&entation I1J o/ pyrami" 4 as a starting point. T. Pyrami" 4, 5 and 6 were strongly suggeste" by t#e stellar alignment. A""ing t#e& to the "esign, and w#at co&es out o/ that as docu&ente" here, convinces me that they di" indee" e6ist. Ne can e%en get a goo" i"ea o/ their base sizes fro& the mat#e&atics o/ the site, and potentially their heights.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egypt Revisited “It Was an Amazing Experience to See Such Wonderful Sites Enhanced by Our Lecturer’S Knowledge...A Fabulous Experience!”
    Limited to just 16 guests EGYPT Revisited “It was an amazing experience to see such wonderful sites enhanced by our lecturer’s knowledge...A fabulous experience!” - Barbara, Maryland Foreground, Red Pyramid at Dahshur; background, Temple of Seti I at Abydos October 19-November 3, 2019 (16 days | 16 guests) with Egyptologist Stephen Harvey optional extensions: pre-tour Siwa Oasis & Alexandria (8 days) and/or post-tour Jordan (5 days) Archaeology-focused tours for the curious to the connoisseur. Dear Traveler, You are invited to return to Egypt on a brand-new, custom-designed tour in the company of AIA lecturer/host Stephen Harvey, Egyptology guide Enass Salah, and a professional tour manager. © Ivrienen Snefru's Bent Pyramid at Dahshur Highlights are many and varied: • Gain inside access to the Red Pyramid at Dahshur, enter the burial chamber of the collapsed pyramid at Meidum, and visit two mud-brick pyramids (Illahun and Hawara) at the Fayoum Oasis. • Go behind-the-scenes at the ancient necropolis of Saqqara to see some of the new and remarkable excavations that are not open to the public, including (pending final confirmation) special access to the newly- discovered, 5th-dynasty Tomb of Wah Ti. • Make a special, private visit (permission pending) to the new Grand Egyptian Museum. • Explore the necropoli of Beni Hasan, known for its 39 rock-cut tombs © Olaf Tausch with well-preserved paintings of dancing, acrobatics, juggling, fishing, Red Pyramid at Dahshur hunting, and weaving; and Tuna el-Gebel, with huge catacombs for thousands of mummified ibises and baboons, and much more. • Visit Tell el-Amarna, which replaced Thebes (modern Luxor) as capital of Egypt under the heretic, 18th-dynasty pharaoh Akhenaton and was significant for its monotheism and distinctive artistic style.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and Mathematics in Ancient Egypt
    ARCHITECTURE AND MATHEMATICS IN ANCIENT EGYPT In this fascinating new study, architect and Egyptologist Corinna Rossi analyses the relationship between mathematics and architecture in ancient Egypt by explor- ing the use of numbers and geometrical figures in ancient architectural projects and buildings. While previous architectural studies have searched for abstract ‘universal rules’ to explain the history of Egyptian architecture, Rossi attempts to reconcile the different approaches of archaeologists, architects and historians of mathematics into a single coherent picture. Using a study of a specific group of monuments, the pyramids, and placing them in the context of their cultural and historical back- ground, Rossi argues that theory and practice of construction must be considered as a continuum, not as two separated fields, in order to allow the original plan- ning process of a building to re-emerge. Highly illustrated with plans, diagrams and figures, this book is essential reading for all scholars of ancient Egypt and the architecture of ancient cultures. Dr Corinna Rossi is a Junior Research Fellow in Egyptology at Churchill College, Cambridge. ARCHITECTURE AND MATHEMATICS IN ANCIENT EGYPT CORINNA ROSSI cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sa~o Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521690539 C Corinna Rossi 2003 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious Pyramid on Elephantine Island: Possible Origin of the Pyramid Code
    Archaeological Discovery, 2017, 5, 187-223 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ad ISSN Online: 2331-1967 ISSN Print: 2331-1959 The Mysterious Pyramid on Elephantine Island: Possible Origin of the Pyramid Code Manu Seyfzadeh Lake Forest, CA, USA How to cite this paper: Seyfzadeh, M. Abstract (2017). The Mysterious Pyramid on Ele- phantine Island: Possible Origin of the After the step pyramids of the Third Dynasty and before the true pyramids of Pyramid Code. Archaeological Discovery, the Fourth Dynasty, seven mysterious minor step pyramids were built by King 5, 187-223. Sneferu1 and a predecessor. None of them were tombs. Clues as to why they https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2017.54012 were built emerged from analyzing their orientation to objects in the sky Received: August 26, 2017 worshiped by the ancient Egyptians and hinted at a renewed preoccupation Accepted: September 19, 2017 with measuring time and the flow of the Nile. The first of the seven was built Published: September 22, 2017 on the Island of Elephantine, Egypt. Its orientation suggests that an aspect of Copyright © 2017 by author and the star Sirius was being enshrined. This paper proposes that this aspect per- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. tained to the different timings of its annual invisibility period observable from This work is licensed under the Creative either the capital at Memphis in Lower Egypt or from Upper Egypt at Ele- Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). phantine. I argue that these periods, measured in days, were converted to di- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ mensions in cubits, and consequently these numbers and the resulting geo- Open Access metric relationships between them became important.
    [Show full text]
  • Saqqara in 3D: a New Look at an Ancient Site by Elaine Sullivan
    Saqqara in 3D: A New Look at an Ancient Site By Elaine Sullivan The Saqqara cemetery, located about 15 kilometers south of the Giza pyramids, is one of Egypt’s most spectacular tourist sites. Modern visitors can explore the catacombs of the Serapeum, the ritual burial place of the Apis bull, wander through beautifully carved and painted tomb chapels more than 4000 years old, and stand before Egypt’s first monumental stone pyramid—the one that started it all—the step pyramid of the king Netjerykhet (later called Djoser). But what did it look like in antiquity? Located in the desert hills west of Egypt’s administrative capital, Memphis, Saqqara was used as the final resting place for royal and elite Egyptians (and sometimes non-elites) from the very start of the Pharaonic Period, in Egypt’s Dynasty 1 (~2950 BCE). The site continued to be used intensely for more than three millennia. But while Saqqara’s long history of occupation thrills archaeologists, it also provides many challenges, especially for understanding the site’s form and appearance at any given moment in the ancient past; changes were constant at the cemetery. Egyptians built new constructions while disassembling and reusing blocks from older monuments, and kings pulled down structures in the way of their new pyramid complexes. Mud-brick structures melted after centuries of rain and wind, and sands from the Sahara blew in and covered older tombs with meters of sand. It is difficult for modern scholars to reimagine so many stages of change concurrently. How can archaeologists better comprehend such multi- layered spaces? In my recently published study of the site, Constructing the Sacred: Visibility and Ritual Landscape at the Egyptian Necropolis of Saqqara, I combine 3D Geographic Information Systems (GIS) visualization technologies with a time-slider to offer a fresh way to consider the necropolis through space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry and Perspective in the Landscape of the Saqqara Pyramids
    GEOMETRY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE LANDSCAPE OF THE SAQQARA PYRAMIDS MAGLI Giulio, (I) Abstract. A series of peculiar, visual alignments between the pyramids of the pharaohs of the 4th , the 5th and the 6th Egyptian dynasties exists. These alignments governed from the very beginning the planning of the funerary monuments of successive kings and, in some cases, led to establish building sites in quite inconvenient locations from the technical viewpoint. Explaining the topography of these monuments means therefore also investigating on their symbolic motivations: religion, power, dynastic lineage and social context, as well as getting insights on the skills of the ancient architects in astronomy and geometry. In the present paper we focus on the relationships between the Old Kingdom pyramids at Saqqara. Key words. Ancient astronomy. Ancient and sacred geometry. Egyptian pyramids. Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 01A16, 51-03. 1 Introduction th It is known since the 19 century that an interesting feature exists in the layouts of the pyramids of th the 4 dynasty at Giza: the presence of a “main axis” connecting the south-east corners of the three main monuments and directed to the area where the ancient temple of the sun of Heliopolis once stood, on the opposite bank of the Nile [1,2,3]. This line is connected with a process of “solarisation” of the pharaohs which started with Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid, and th lasted up Menkaure, the builder of the third Giza pyramid [4,5]. The kings of the 5 dynasty moved - in spite of the presence of several favorable places to the immediate south of Giza - some 7 Kms apart on the plateau of Abusir.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Pyramids
    EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS LO: to discover facts about the Ancient Egyptian Pyramids The Egyptian pyramids are stone structures, mostly built as tombs for Egyptian Kings. Pyramid of Djoser There are over one hundred pyramids in Egypt, the first was the Pyramid of Djoser, built over four thousand years ago in Saqqara, south of Cairo. It was designed by the architect Imhotep and built during the third dynasty. This is thought to be the oldest monumental structure in the world made from cut stone. Photo courtesy of isawnyu (@flickr.com) - granted under creative commons licence - attribution It is not known how many men it took to build a pyramid, estimates are anything from two thousand to a hundred thousand!! Pyramid building would happen when the Nile was in flood. Q: Why do you think they chose this A: It was impossible to farm the land time of year to build? so many men were available for work. Photo courtesy of sir john gardner wilkinson – Public Domain – Wikimedia Commons The most famous pyramids are those in Giza. Photo courtesy of zoonabar (@flickr.com) - granted under creative commons licence - attribution Can you spot the River Nile on the map? Are you ready for a fact hunt? Photo courtesy of zoonabar (@flickr.com) - granted under creative commons licence - attribution The Pyramid of Khufu The Pyramid of Khufu, sometimes called the 'Great Pyramid' of Giza is the largest of all the Egyptian pyramids. It is one of the 'Seven Wonders of the Ancient World' and is the only one still standing. Photo courtesy of u07ch (@flickr.com) - granted under
    [Show full text]
  • Funerary Complex of Djoser at Sakkara : 1 Sakkara Is One Section of the Great Necropolis of Memphis, the Old Kingdom Capital A
    1 : Funerary Complex of Djoser at Sakkara . Sakkara is one section of the great necropolis of Memphis, the Old Kingdom capital and the kings of the 1st Dynasty as well as that of the 2nd Dynasty are mostly buried in this section of the Memphis necropolis. It has been of constant interest to Egyptologists. Three major discoveries have recently been made at Sakkara, including a prime minister’s tomb, a queen’s pyramid, and the tomb of the son of a dynasty-founding king. Each discovery has a fascinating story, with many adventures for the archaeologists as they revealed the secrets of the past. Sakkara is best known for the Step Pyramid, the oldest known of Egypt's 97 pyramids. It was built for King Djoser of the 3rd Dynasty by the architect and genius Imhotep, who designed it and its surrounding complex to be as grand as it was unique and revolutionary. Imhotep was the first to build stone tombs in honor of the king's majesty. His many titles included 'Treasurer of the King of Lower Egypt', 'Administrator of the Great Palace', and ''Imhotep the Builder, the Sculptor, the Maker of Stone Vessels. -١ - Egyp. Monuments The funerary complex of Djoser (Zoser) is believed to have been built around the beginning of the 3rd Dynasty. It is a walled compound that is constructed from stone rather than the mud brick that was used before this time. The stones that are used are different from the huge stones used in the pyramids at Giza, in that they are small in size.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclinations of Egyptian Pyramids and Finding of the Divine Essence
    Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2015, 3(1), 1-27; http://aaatec.org/art/a_gs1 www.aaatec.org ISSN 2310-2144 Inclinations of Egyptian Pyramids and Finding of the Divine Essence Stanislav Arkadievich Grigoriev Institute of History and Archaeology, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The aim of this research is discovery of astronomical reasons in orientation of slopes of Egyptian pyramids used as tombs for pharaohs of Ancient Egypt. The article contains results of statistical analysis of change in inclination of slopes of the pyramids (3rd – 2nd millennia BC) depending on time of their building. The first year of the corresponding pharaoh‟s reign has been accepted, as usually it is considered that building of pyramids ones started during either the first or second year of the reign. On the base of the obtained results a conclusion has been drawn that the average annual change of the angle of slopes of pyramids was close to value of the precession of the equinoxes. The sides were directed to the Sun at culmination, but a day for this procedure was chosen by the acronical rising of some stars after the autumnal equinox. In the course of research days of heliacal and acronical risings of some mythologically important stars have been determined for the first year of pharaohs reign. Within framework of the suggested hypothesis, the received days have been compared with days when the Sun was at culmination at height equal to the angle of slopes of a corresponding pyramid. Such comparison has made possible to discover that the inclination of the slopes of the earliest pyramids was connected with acronical rising of star Betelgeuse that has been connected with Osiris cult.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Building Stone in the Old Kingdom of Ancient Egypt As an Indicator of Changes in Knowledge
    Material Science and Applied Chemistry ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 2012 / 25 Application of Building Stone in the Old Kingdom of Ancient Egypt as an Indicator of Changes in Knowledge Agnese Kukela1, Valdis Seglins2, 1-2University of Latvia Abstract. The study investigates the construction stages, introduced. These innovations concerned large-scale materials and binder used in the Step Pyramid of Djoser to application of building stone and binder of far better quality, determine its current state of preservation. This research has and they resulted in construction of previously unthinkable allowed identifying 5 different building stone selection stages, structures. In this sense, the Step Pyramid of Djoser is a marking the development of knowledge on construction materials and their properties. This pyramid is exposed to deterioration unique structure and provides evidence for numerous attempts processes threatening stability of the structure. Unconsidered to implement innovations concerning geological knowledge restoration strategy just aggravates the situation, but this study on building stone available and its properties, binder and its would assist in elaboration of appropriate conservation measures. variations for different purposes, thus marking an extremely important stage in the initial development of the silicate Key words: stone material, stone processing, indicators of chemistry. Furthermore, it also concerns the areas of planning, knowledge, Ancient Egypt development of building constructions, engineering calculations, etc. The experiments and innovations promoted rapid diversification of building material. Such improved I. INTRODUCTION knowledge was successfully applied to developing the world’s The Old Kingdom of Ancient Egypt (ca. 2686-2160 BC) is major stone construction project – the complex of pyramids at notable as a time of rapid changes in the society and also in Giza.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Pyramids
    EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS LO: I can describe events from the past using dates when things happened What remains of ancient Egypt? • https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zg87xnb/articles/zr7qy9q/ • We know about the ancient Egyptians from the discovery of lots of buildings, monuments, objects and mummies. • The practice of studying these items is called Egyptology and the people who study them are called Egyptologists. An Egyptologist is an archaeologist who specialises in Ancient Egypt. • Let’s be Egyptologists today and take a look at some amazing artefacts: pyramids. The Egyptian pyramids are stone structures, mostly built as tombs for Egyptian Kings. Step Pyramid The first ‘pyramid’ was the Djoser, built in Saqqara, south of Cairo. It began as a Before the creation of the traditional, flat-roofed mastaba. true pyramid, three other step pyramids were built – It has six tiers and was built in stages. Each the pyramids of step was made of rough stones before Sekhemkhet, Khaba and being covered in limestone. The limestone Lepsuis. was polished to make the pyramid gleam. Similar to the mastaba, the burial chambers of the step pyramids were underground and complex. Pyramid of Djoser There are over one hundred pyramids in Egypt, the first was the Pyramid of Djoser, built over four thousand years ago in Saqqara, south of Cairo. This is thought to be the oldest monumental structure in the world made from cut stone. It is not known how many men it took to build a pyramid - estimates are anything from two thousand to a hundred thousand! Pyramid building would happen when the Nile was in flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Kingdom and Pyramid Builders Found in 1898 by Quibell and Green in the Temple of Horus at Hierakonpolis
    Old Kingdom and Pyramid Builders Found in 1898 by Quibell and Green in the Temple of Horus at Hierakonpolis Tomb of King Djer (ca. 3000 BC) Umm el-Qaab Chronology 3100 – 2686 BC Early Dynastic (Dynasty 0 – 2) 2686 – 2181 BC Old Kingdom (Dynasty 3 – 6) 2181 – 2025 BC First Intermediate Period (Dyn. 7 – 10) 2025 – 1700 BC Middle Kingdom (Dyn. 11 – 13) 1700 – 1550 BC Second Intermediate Period (Dyn. 14 – 17) 1550 – 1069 BC New Kingdom (Dyn. 18 – 20) 1069 – 664 BC Third Intermediate Period (Dyn. 21 – 25) 664 – 332 BC Late Period (Dyn. 26 – 31) 332 – 30 BC Ptolemaic Period (Selected) Old Kingdom Rulers Third Dynasty • Djoser/Netjerikhet (ca. 2630-2611 BC) Fourth Dynasty • Sneferu (ca. 2575-2551 BC) • Khufu (ca. 2251-2528 BC) • Khafre (ca. 2520-2494 BC) • Menkaure (ca. 2472-2467 BC) All Creative Commons (Selected) Old Kingdom Rulers Fifth Dynasty • Userkaf (ca. 2465-2458 BC) • Sahure (ca. 2458-2446 BC) clevelandart.org • Unas (ca. 2356-2323 BC) Sixth Dynasty metmuseum.org • Teti (ca. 2323-2150 BC) • Pepi I (ca. 2289-2255 BC) • Pepi II (ca. 2246-2152 BC) brooklynmuseum.org What is a pyramid? - Gigantic tombstone - Glorified storage unit - Stairway to heaven - Representation of massive cultural development - Economic driving force Limestone: poorer quality blocks for internal structure, fine quality for outer casing stones Basalt: floors of mortuary temple Granite: red granite preferred for casing of burial chambers, sarcophagi, temple walls Diorite and gneiss: statues and vessels Travertine/Egyptian alabaster: vessels Khufu’s Pyramid Fun Facts
    [Show full text]
  • PYRAMIDS and ZIGGURATS COMPARING and CONTRASTING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN Built Circa 2649–1500S B.C.E
    The Pyramids PYRAMIDS AND ZIGGURATS COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN Built circa 2649–1500s B.C.E. White limestone Old and Middle Kingdom Egypt cladding PYRAMIDS AND MESOPOTAMIAN ZIGGURATS Deep inside, in a secret chamber, Early civilizations in the Middle East, the Americas, and elsewhere built towering pyramids entombed Egypt’s dead structures that held importance in their societies. But their meaning to the people The Ziggurats rulers to assure their safe transition Built circa 2100–500s B.C.E. to the afterlife. Beside the ruler’s who planned, built, and lived with them was markedly different. Sumer / Babylonia / Assyria mummified body, the pyramid contained food and supplies for their High atop the ziggurats, scholars comfort and support in the afterlife. believe there was either a shrine to Pyramids developed from an earlier Tigris the greatest god of the location or one-layer rectangular tomb, called a an area designed for astronomical Portcullis Air shafts mastaba. Experts continue to argue Dur Sharrukin observation. Since there are no about how they were constructed. complete ziggurats left in the world, Grand gallery we cannot know with certainty. The Great Pyramid of Giza, built by Ziggurats may have developed from Ascending passage Nineveh Khufu in the early 2500s B.C.E., is the King’s chamber earlier shrines that were raised above largest of the Egyptian pyramids. It Kalhu ground level. contains 2.3 Euphrates Entrance million limestone blocks, with Asshur The Great Ziggurat of Ur was built by an average weight of 1.8 metric Queen’s chamber Hassuna Ur-Nammu in the twenty-first century tons (2 tons) per block, Descending passage B.C.E.
    [Show full text]