PYRAMIDS and ZIGGURATS COMPARING and CONTRASTING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN Built Circa 2649–1500S B.C.E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PYRAMIDS and ZIGGURATS COMPARING and CONTRASTING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN Built Circa 2649–1500S B.C.E The Pyramids PYRAMIDS AND ZIGGURATS COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ANCIENT EGYPTIAN Built circa 2649–1500s B.C.E. White limestone Old and Middle Kingdom Egypt cladding PYRAMIDS AND MESOPOTAMIAN ZIGGURATS Deep inside, in a secret chamber, Early civilizations in the Middle East, the Americas, and elsewhere built towering pyramids entombed Egypt’s dead structures that held importance in their societies. But their meaning to the people The Ziggurats rulers to assure their safe transition Built circa 2100–500s B.C.E. to the afterlife. Beside the ruler’s who planned, built, and lived with them was markedly different. Sumer / Babylonia / Assyria mummified body, the pyramid contained food and supplies for their High atop the ziggurats, scholars comfort and support in the afterlife. believe there was either a shrine to Pyramids developed from an earlier Tigris the greatest god of the location or one-layer rectangular tomb, called a an area designed for astronomical Portcullis Air shafts mastaba. Experts continue to argue Dur Sharrukin observation. Since there are no about how they were constructed. complete ziggurats left in the world, Grand gallery we cannot know with certainty. The Great Pyramid of Giza, built by Ziggurats may have developed from Ascending passage Nineveh Khufu in the early 2500s B.C.E., is the King’s chamber earlier shrines that were raised above largest of the Egyptian pyramids. It Kalhu ground level. contains 2.3 Euphrates Entrance million limestone blocks, with Asshur The Great Ziggurat of Ur was built by an average weight of 1.8 metric Queen’s chamber Hassuna Ur-Nammu in the twenty-first century tons (2 tons) per block, Descending passage B.C.E. and was dedicated to the moon mainly from a nearby Mari god Nanna/Sin. It is a rectangular, limestone quarry. There Subterranean chamber three-layer ziggurat, without interior are three burial chambers chambers. Entered by three staircases in the pyramid, with the Tell Asmar (one in the front, and one on each king’s chamber composed of granite. side), its sides aligned from north to Etemenanki Great Pyramid at Giza Babylon south and from east to west. It was built The Step Pyramid of Djoser, built using sunbaked mud bricks and with in Saqqara circa 2600 B.C.E. and Lagash Barsippa Susa a baked brick casing for protection. designed by Imhotep, is considered Mediterranean Sea the first Egyptian pyramid. Imhotep Nippur Etemenanki, also known as the Temple built it up from a simple, one-layer Uruk of Marduk and thought by some to Sais Basora mastaba with an underground burial Heliópolis Ur be the original Tower of Babel, was a Giza Temple chamber to a six-step pyramid. Cairo seven-layer Babylonian ziggurat, with Djoser Built with sunbaked Memphis Eridu each layer a different color. The top Red mud bricks The first king of the Fourth Dynasty, Pyramid Tell-el-Amarna was probably accessed using ramps. Sneferu (father of Khufu), built three Bent Pyramid pyramids around 2500 B.C.E. The first, Assyrian king Sargon II built a ziggurat modern day coastline in Dur Sharrukin, now Khorsabad, in the Meidum Pyramid, was an attempt Meidum Persian Gulf at a true (straight-sided) pyramid Amarna the eighth century B.C.E. There are constructed over a step pyramid. Its four layers left, originally colored in limestone casing seems not to have Side staircases order from the bottom, white, black, had enough support: part of it fell off. red, and white or blue. This may be the reason that Snefru’s City location second pyramid, the Bent Pyramid, Open portal which was meant to be a true pyramid Known ziggurat locations from the start, has a sudden change Dendera Valley of the Karna Red Sea Known pyramid locations of angle. Maybe the builders realized Kings the original angle was too steep. Luxor Sneferu’s Red Pyramid, his third, was the first true pyramid to survive. Main staircase Great Ziggurat of Ur .
Recommended publications
  • PYRAMIDS and ZIGGURATS AS the ARCHITECTONIC REPRESENTATIONS of the ARCHETYPE of the COSMIC MOUNTAIN. Part I
    I Andrzej WIERCINSKI, Warszawa PYRAMIDS AND ZIGGURATS AS THE ARCHITECTONIC REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ARCHETYPE OF THE COSMIC MOUNTAIN. Part I "Is there a man of you who by anxious thought can add a cubit to the age of his life? "(The Gospel of St. Matthew, 6, 27, according to Greek text) 1. Explanation of the problem The astrobiological religion played the role of a main ideological system which regulated societies of the formative-theocratic phase of cultural development of mankind which was distinguished by the rise of cultic centers of the monumental architecture. The latter ones were the cores of early urbanisation process. This religion has precised a model of the world with well defined position of man within it, and the sense of his activities. Its essence consisted of a dynamical and informational principle of transformation of an Absolute One into pairs of polarised opposites which, in turn, create an universal frame of reference of Cardinal Points organizing the time-spatial order of rhythmically repeating and mutually synchron­ ised cosmic, biological and socio-cultural processes and, at last, the psychic processes of the human individual. All these was vivified, personificated and deified ( for the main assumtions of the model see: A. Wiercinski, 19761 ). The astrobiological model of the world and man was statically patterned in mutually equivalent, due to a symbolical analogisation, archetypical (in Jungian sense) and iconic-numerical representations. Among them, the main position has been occupied by: the Cosmic Mountain, the Cosmic Tree � Cosmic Ladder � Cosmic Pillar, the Mandala, the Cosmic Man� man as Microcosmos and, © Del documento, los autores.
    [Show full text]
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15:2, 2005
    Location of the Old Kingdom Pyramids in Egypt Miroslav Bârta The principal factors influencing the location of the Old Kingdom pyramids in Egypt are reconsidered. The decisive factors influencing their distribution over an area of c. eighty kilometres were essentially of economic, géomorphologie, socio-political and unavoidably also of religious nature. Primary importance is to be attributed to the existence of the Old Kingdom capital of Egypt, Memphis, which was a central place with regard to the Old Kingdom pyramid fields. Its economic potential and primacy in the largely redistribution- driven state economy sustained construction of the vast majority of the pyramid complexes in its vicinity. The location of the remaining number of the Old Kingdom pyramids, including many of the largest ever built, is explained using primarily archaeological evidence. It is claimed that the major factors influencing their location lie in the sphere of general trends governing ancient Egyptian society of the period. For millennia, megaliths and monumental arts were pyramids see Edwards 1993; Fakhry 1961; Hawass commissioned by the local chieftains and later by the 2003; Lehner 1997; Stadelmann 1985; 1990; Vallogia kings of Egypt. The ideological reasons connected 2001; Verner 2002; Dodson 2003). The reasons that may with the construction and symbolism of the pyra­ be put forward to explain their location and arrange­ mids were manifold, and in most cases obvious: the ment are numerous but may be divided into two basic manifestation of power, status and supremacy over groups: practical and religious. It will be argued that the territory and population, the connection with the whereas the general pattern in the distribution of the sacred world and the unlimited authority of the rulers pyramid sites may be due mainly to practical reasons, (O'Connor & Silverman 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Pharaohs
    Ancient Egyptians: History Information Sheet Famous Pharaohs Name: Khufu Name: Khafra Reigned: 2589 - 2566 BC Reigned: 2558 - 2504 BC Khufu is also known as King Cheops and Khafra is famous for building the is the builder of the Great Pyramid of second of the pyramids at Giza and the Giza. The Giza pyramids are famous as Sphinx which guards his tomb. Some being the oldest of the Seven Ancient historians believe that the head of the Wonders of the World and the only one Sphinx is carved in Khafra’s image. to still be in existence today. Name: Ankhenaten Name: Hatshepsut Reigned:1351 - 1337 BC Reigned: 1472 - 1457 BC Ankhenaten is most remembered for Hatshepsut is remembered not only changing the belief system of ancient because she was a woman (it was very Egypt, if only for a short while. He rare for a woman to be a ruler) but also introduced Aten, a sun god, as the one because of the many accomplishments true god and changed Egypt from a she achieved throughout her reign. kingdom that worshiped many gods to During her reign, trade flourished, the a kingdom that worshiped just one. economy grew and she built and restored many magnificent temples Name: Rameses II and other buildings. Reigned: 1279 - 1213 BC Rameses II is also known as Rameses Name: Tutankhamen the Great. He was a great military ruler Reigned: 1334 - 1325 BC and famously defeated the Hittites to Tutankhamen is not remembered for his regain control of lands that had been reign as king as much as he is famous lost during the reign of Ankhenaten.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSETTA/OSIRIS Observations of the 67P Nucleus During the April 2016 flyby: High-Resolution Spectrophotometry
    ROSETTA/OSIRIS observations of the 67P nucleus during the April 2016 flyby: high-resolution spectrophotometry accepted in A&A, DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/201833807 C. Feller1 [Corresponding author: clement.feller-at-obspm.fr], S. Fornasier1, S. Ferrari2, P.H. Hasselmann1 , A. Barucci1, M. Massironi2, J.D.P Deshapriya1 , H. Sierks3, G. Naletto4,5,6, P. L. Lamy7, R. Rodrigo8,9, D. Koschny10, B.J.R. Davidsson11 , J.-L. Bertaux7, I. Bertini4, D. Bodewits12, G. Cremonese13, V. Da Deppo6, S. Debei14, M. De Cecco15, M. Fulle16, P. J. Gutiérrez17, C. Güttler3, W.-H. Ip18,19, H. U. Keller20,21, L. M. Lara17, M. Lazzarin12, J. J. López- Moreno17, F. Marzari4, X. Shi3, C. Tubiana3 , B. Gaskell22, F. La Forgia4 , A. Lucchetti13,S. Mottola21, M. Pajola13, F. Preusker21, and F. Scholten21 1LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, 5 Place J. Janssen, Meudon Cedex 92195, France 2Center of Studies and Activities for Space (CISAS) G. Colombo, University of Padova, Via Venezia 15, 35131 Padova, Italy 3Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg, 3, 37077, Goettingen, Germany 4University of Padova, Department of Physics and Astronomy “Galileo Galilei”, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy 5University of Padova, Center of Studies and Activities for Space (CISAS) “G. Colombo”, Via Venezia 15, 35131 Padova, Italy 6CNR-IFN UOS Padova LUXOR, Via Trasea, 7, 35131 Padova, Italy 7LATMOS, CNRS/UVSQ/IPSL, 11 boulevard d’Alembert,78280, Guyancourt, France 8Centro de
    [Show full text]
  • Antiochus I Soter
    Antiochus I Soter home : ancient Persia : ancient Greece : Seleucids : index : article by Jona Lendering Antiochus I Soter Antiochus I Soter ('the savior'): name of a Seleucid king, ruled from 281 to 261. Successor of: Seleucus I Nicator Relatives: Father: Seleucus I Nicator Coin of Antiochus I Soter Mother: Apame I, daughter of Spitamenes (Museum of Anatolian Wife: Stratonice I (his stepmother), daughter of Demetrius Civilizations, Ankara) Poliorcetes Children: Seleucus Laodice Apame II (married to Magas of Cyrene) Stratonice II (married to Demetrius II of Macedonia) Antiochus II Theos Main deeds: 301: Present during the Battle of Ipsus 294/293: marriage with his father's wife Stratonice I 292: made co-regent and satrap of Bactria (perhaps Seleucus was thinking of the ancient Achaemenid office of mathišta) Stay in Babylon (on several occasions?), where he showed an interest in the cults of Sin and Marduk, and in the rebuilding of the Esagila and Etemenanki September 281: death of Seleucus (more...); accession of Antiochus; Philetaerus of Pergamon buys back Seleucus' corpse 280-279: Brief war against Ptolemy II Philadelphus (First Syrian War, first part); Cappadocia becomes independent when its leader Ariarathes II and his ally Orontes III of Armenia defeat the Seleucid general Amyntas 279: Intervention in Greece: soldiers sent to Thermopylae to fight against the Galatians; they are defeated 275 Successful "Elephant Battle" against the Galatians; they enter his army as mercenaries; Antiochus is called Soter, 'victor' 274-271: Unsuccessful war against Ptolemy (First Syrian War, second part) 268: Stay in Babylonia; rebuilding of the Ezida in Borsippa 266: Execution of his son Seleucus 263: Eumenes I of Pergamon, successor of Philetaerus, declares himself independent 262: Antiochus defeated by Eumenes Page 1 Antiochus I Soter 262: Antiochus defeated by Eumenes Dies 2 June 261 Succeeded by: Antiochus II Theos Sources: During Antiochus' years as crown prince, he played a large role in Babylonian policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pyramids of Ancient Egypt by History.Com, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 08.01.17 Word Count 765 Level 870L
    The Pyramids of Ancient Egypt By History.com, adapted by Newsela staff on 08.01.17 Word Count 765 Level 870L The Great Pyramid of Giza, also called the Pyramid of Khufu or Cheops, is the oldest and largest of the three pyramids in the Giza Necropolis bordering what is now Cairo, Egypt. The Great Pyramid was originally covered by casing stones that formed a smooth outer surface. Photo: Jerome Bon/Wikimedia Commons The pyramids of Egypt are among history's greatest buildings. A pyramid is a building with four triangle-shaped sides and a square base. The peak of pyramid building began late in Egypt's third dynasty. It continued until about the sixth, around 2325 B.C. In ancient Egypt, a dynasty was a period where all of the rulers were from a single family. The Egyptian pyramids are still a sight to see. They give us a peek into the country’s rich and glorious past. The Pharaoh in Egyptian Society During the third and fourth dynasties, Egypt prospered greatly. Kings, or pharaohs, held a special position in Egyptian society. They were believed to have been chosen by the gods. Ancient Egyptians believed that when the pharaoh died, part of his spirit remained with his body. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 1 To properly care for his spirit, his body was mummified. Everything the king would need in the afterlife was buried with him. This included gold bowls and cups, food, furniture and other offerings. The Egyptians built pyramids as tombs for their pharaohs.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”
    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconography of the Princess in the Old Kingdom 119 Vivienne G
    THE OLD KINGDOM ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE HELD IN PRAGUE, MAY 31 – JUNE 4, 2004 Miroslav Bárta editor Czech Institute of Egyptology Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague Academia Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague 2006 OOKAApodruhéKAApodruhé sstrtr ii–xii.indd–xii.indd 3 99.3.2007.3.2007 117:18:217:18:21 Contributors Nicole Alexanian, James P. Allen, Susan Allen, Hartwig Altenmüller, Tarek El Awady, Miroslav Bárta, Edith Bernhauer, Edward Brovarski, Vivienne G. Callender, Vassil Dobrev, Laurel Flentye, Rita Freed, Julia Harvey, Salima Ikram, Peter Jánosi, Nozomu Kawai, Jaromír Krejčí, Kamil O. Kuraszkiewicz, Renata Landgráfová, Serena Love, Dušan Magdolen, Peter Der Manuelian, Ian Mathieson, Karol Myśliwiec, Stephen R. Phillips, Gabriele Pieke, Ann Macy Roth, Joanne M. Rowland, Regine Schulz, Yayoi Shirai, Nigel Strudwick, Miroslav Verner, Hana Vymazalová, Sakuji Yoshimura, Christiane Ziegler © Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, 2006 ISBN 80-200-1465-9 OOKAApodruhéKAApodruhé sstrtr ii–xii.indd–xii.indd 4 99.3.2007.3.2007 117:18:217:18:21 Contents Foreword ix Bibliography xi Tomb and social status. The textual evidence 1 Nicole Alexanian Some aspects of the non-royal afterlife in the Old Kingdom 9 James P. Allen Miniature and model vessels in Ancient Egypt 19 Susan Allen Presenting the nDt-Hr-offerings to the tomb owner 25 Hartwig Altenmüller King Sahura with the precious trees from Punt in a unique scene! 37 Tarek El Awady The Sixth Dynasty tombs in Abusir. Tomb complex of the vizier Qar and his family 45 Miroslav Bárta Die Statuen mit Papyrusrolle im Alten Reich 63 Edith Bernhauer False doors & history: the Sixth Dynasty 71 Edward Brovarski The iconography of the princess in the Old Kingdom 119 Vivienne G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible Has Never Told
    Ghana Journal of Linguistics 9.1: 72-96 (2020) ______________________________________________________________________________ http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v9i1.4 EDITORIAL BOOK CRITIQUE: THE ORIGIN OF THE WORD AMEN: ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE THE BIBLE HAS NEVER TOLD Ọbádélé Bakari Kambon Editor-in-Chief Abstract: The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told is a book that promises to pique the interest of any reader interested in classical Kmt ‘Black Nation/Land of the Blacks’, mdw nTr ‘Hieroglyphs,’ the Akan language, and historical-linguistic connections between the three. Specifically, the book promises to deliver information about how the word imn ‘Amen,’ as attested in classical Kmt ‘Black Nation/Land of the Blacks,’ persists in the contemporary Akan language. While under a steady hand this should be a simple enough thesis to substantiate, unfortunately, the authors’ obvious lack of grounding in historical linguistics, their lack of knowledge of mdw nTr ‘Hieroglyphs’ as well as their lack of understanding the morphology (word structure) of the Akan language all mar the analyses presented in the book. Keywords: Amen, Heru Narmer, historical linguistics, folk etymology Osei, O. K., Issa, J., & Faraji, S. (2020). The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told. Long Beach, CA: Amen-Ra Theological Seminary Press. 1. Introduction In The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told, what should be an open-and-shut case is saddled with a plethora of spurious look-alikes and folk etymologies prompted by attempts to analyze one language with another without actually having studying the language to be analyzed itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Religion on the Silver Screen: Modern Anxieties About Race, Ethnicity, and Religion Caroline T
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons College of the Pacific aF culty Articles All Faculty Scholarship 10-1-2003 Ancient Egyptian Religion on the Silver Screen: Modern Anxieties about Race, Ethnicity, and Religion Caroline T. Schroeder Cornell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cop-facarticles Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Schroeder, Caroline T. (2016) "Ancient Egyptian Religion on the Silver Screen: Modern Anxieties about Race, Ethnicity, and Religion," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 7 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol7/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of the Pacific aF culty Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Religion & Film Volume 7 Article 1 Issue 2 October 2003 12-14-2016 Ancient Egyptian Religion on the Silver Screen: Modern Anxieties about Race, Ethnicity, and Religion Caroline T. Schroeder Ithaca College, [email protected] Recommended Citation Schroeder, Caroline T. (2016) "Ancient Egyptian Religion on the Silver Screen: Modern Anxieties about Race, Ethnicity, and Religion," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 7 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol7/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO.
    [Show full text]