The Egyptian Pyramids
T H £ EGYPTIAN vPYKWID?: \ AN ANALYSIS OF A Great Mystery. 1 BY EVERETT W. FISH, M. D, 1 Sbcond Edition CHICAGO: KVERE1T W. FISH, 188 Monroe Street. * 1880. DT£ Registered with the Librarian at Washington, D, C, Jan. 1880. .1 J OvA^ajtaj TO ntaitt Mm:n, * £&Z*9 AN EARNEST STUDENT, IN ART AND SCIENCE, Whose good opinion is valued more than the acclamation of the throng, Is this Imperfect Token Inscribed. PREFACE. p^^lNCE this work was undertaken, with the view of pre- 1 ^ senting a purely scientific essay on the Pyramids, its ' plan has been materially changed. The range of study, necessary to develop the scientific features, has in- woven many religious coincidences, complicating the mys- tery of their origin, which it would be folly to cast aside. It is not a proposition to be sneered at by the most invet- erate theomachist, that the design, origin, and destiny of the Great Pyramid are theistic, although reasonably subject to negative criticism. Nor, though fashionable with most modern writers of materialis- tic views, does it comport with good sense and justice to underrate coinci- dences, which, as evidences, are opposed to our own views. But they should rather be weighed, value for value, with physical testimony; for the day has not yet come when we can either dogmatically negate the direct gov- ernment of a spiritual essence, or demolish with rare mepris the intel" lectual giants, whose minds, (as broad and untrammeled as our own), have found "reason" in a divinity, and "common sense" in a revelation. When the bases fall from the physical deductions of Kepler, Bacon, Newton, Napier, and an array of minds breaking from the shackles of past schools of thought to inaugurate new systems, but still beholding a God in the universe, then we may conclude that our views of theism and* cosmogony are alone up to the level of philosophy, and consign theirs to neglect.
[Show full text]