Bibliography
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BIBLIOGRAPHY Books Baylis, J. and Smith S. 2005. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. Cheng, Tao. 1974. The Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Tiao-yu-tai (Senkaku) Islands and the Law of Territorial Acquisition. 14 VA. J. INT’L L. Collins, Alan. 2000. The Security Dilemmas of South East Asia. Basingstoke: Macmillan ---------, Alan. 2003. Security and Southeast Asia: Domestic, Regional and Global Issues. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Connor, Walker. 1978. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Roudledge, Taylor and Francis Group Donnelly, Jack O. 2008. The Ethics of Realism. in Christian Reus-Smit, Duncan Snidal Ed. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford University. Press, Goldstein, Joshua S. and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2007. International Relations. United States: Pearson International Edition. Grant, Thomas D. 1999. The recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. Herz, J. 1950. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics vol. 2, no. 2. Cambridge University Press. Hoadley, Stephen and Jürgen Rüland, Ed. 2006. Asian Security Reassessed. Singapore: ISEAS Publication Pasir Panjang. Jennings, Robert. 1963. The Acquisition of Territory in International Law. New York: N.Y.: Oceana Publications. Kegley, Charles W. Wittkopf, Eugene R. 2005. World Politics: Trends and Transformation 10th Ed. England: Cengange Learning. Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 96 97 Lynn-Jones, S.M. 1995. Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics. Security Studies vol. 4, no. 4. Frank Cass, London. Loraine Blaxter, Christina Hughes, and Malcolm Tight. 2006. How to Research: Third Edition. McGraw-Hill Education: Open University Press. Marvasti, Amir B. 2004. Qualitative Research in Sociology. Great Britain: The Cromwell Press Ltd. Mas’oed, Mohtar. 1990. Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Disiplin dan Metodologi. Jakarta: LP3ES. Mearsheimer, J. J. no year. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton. ----------------, Hans J. 1952. Another 'Great Debate': The National Interest of the United States. liThe American Political Science Review, XLVI 972. ---------------, Hans J. 1967. Politics among Nations 4th Ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ---------------, Hans J. 1978. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace 5th Edition, Revised. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Murray, Thomas, R. 2003. Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Theses and Dissertation. United States of America: Corwin Press. Nasution, Dahlan. 1983. Konsep Politik Internasional. Jakarta: Bina Cinta. Plano, Jack C. and Roy Olton. 1973. The International Dictionary. New York: Western Michigan University. Shambaugh, David and Michael Yahuda, Ed. 2008. International Relations of Asia. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Shaw, Malcolm Nathan. 2003. International Law. Cambridge University Press. Silalahi, Uber. 1999. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: UNPAR Press. Stewart, Patrick. 2007. Failed' States and Global Security: Empirical Questions and Policy Dilemmas. International Studies Review: Blackwell Publishing. The World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 98 Tishkov, Valery. 2000. Forget the 'Nation': Post-nationalist Understanding of Nationalism. Walt, S.M. 1998. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy No.110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge Spring 1998. Published by: The Slate Group, a division of The Washington Post Company Wheaton, Henry. 1836. Elements of International Law: With a Sketch of the History of the Science. Philadephia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard. Yoshiro, Matsui. 1997. International Law of Territorial Acquisition and the Dispute over the Senkaku (Diaoyu) Islands. Japanese Annual of International Law, No. 40. Journals Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics vol. 30, no.2. N.J.: Princeton University Press. --------, Robert. 1978. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Lee, Seokwoo. 2002. The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan and the Territorial Disputes in East Asia. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2002. -----, Seokwo. No year. Territorial Disputes among Japan, China and Taiwan Concerning the Senkaku Islands. International Boundaries Research Unit Volume 3 Number 7. Lee, Wei-chin. 1987. Trouble under the Water: Sino-Japanese Conflict of Sovereignty on the Continental Shelf in the East China Sea. Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 18, 1987 Okuhara, Toshio. 1971. The Territorial Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands and Problems on the Surrounding Continental Shelf. Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 15, 1971. Roe, Paul. The Intrastate Security Dilemma: Ethnic Conflict as a 'Tragedy'? Journal of Peace Research vol. 36, no. 2 March 1999 Wu Hui. 2001. The Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu Islands and the Prospect for Its Resolution: An International Law Perspective [Cong guojifa lun 99 zhongri diaoyudao zhengduan jiqi jiejue qianjing], Zhongguo Bianjian Shidi Yanjiu, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2001, pp. 75-83. e-Journals Gavan McCormack, Much Ado over Small Islands: The Sino-Japanese Confrontation over Senkaku/Diaoyu. The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 11, Issue 21, No. 3, May 27, 2013. Home page On-line. Available: http://www.japanfocus.org/-Gavan-McCormack/3947, accessed on July 21st, 2014 Hara, Kimie. 1998. Japanese-Russian/Soviet Relations Since 1945: A Difficult Peace. London: Routledge. Hara, Kimie. 1998. “Japanese-Russian/Soviet Relations Since 1945: A Difficult Peace”. London: Routledge. ------, Kimie. 2012. The San Francisco Peace Treaty and Frontier Problems in The Regional Order in East Asia A Sixty Year Perspective. The Asia- Pacific Journal, Vol 10, Issue 17, No. 1, April 23, 2012.Home page on-line. Available: http://www.japanfocus.org/-kimie-hara/3739, accessed July 1st, 2014 Haruki, Wada. Resolving the China-Japan Conflict Over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands," The Asia-Pacific Journal, 43-3-10, October 25, 2010. Home page On-line. Available: http://japanfocus.org/-wada-haruki/3433, accessed July 21th, 2013 Heflin, William B. 2000. Diayou/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Japan and China, Ocean Apart. Asian-Pacific Law, Policy Journal. Home page on-line. Available: http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/2011/11/APLPJ_01.2_heflin.pdf, accessed July 1st, 2014 Prospect Journal UCSD, Strategic Responses to the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute. Prospect Journal of International Affairs at UCSD, 10-15-13, October 15, 2013. Home page On-line. Available: http://prospectjournal.org/2013/10/15/strategic-responses-to-the-senkakudiaoyu -islands-dispute/, accessed July 21th, 2014. Suganuma, Unryu. 2000. Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Association for Asian Studies and University of Hawai'i Press. Home page On-line. Available: http://www.uhpress.hawaii.edu/p-9780824824938.aspx, accessed July 21th, 2014 100 Research Reports Brookings Policy Brief Series. Bush, Richard C. 2010. China-Japan Security Relations. Home page On-line. Available:http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2010/10/china-japan- bush, accessed on May 13th, 2014 Cheng-China Huang, ICE Case Studies Diayou Islands Dispute. Home page On-line, available: http://www.interlog.com/~yuan/evidence.html. Accessed on July 1st, 2014. Granados, Ulises. 2014. U.S. Involvement in the Sino-Japanese Diaoyu/Senkaku Conflict: Finding Solutions for Stability in the East China Sea 美国介入中 钓鱼岛/尖阁诸岛冲突:求解中国 东海稳定困局 East Asia Security Symposium and Conference 东亚安全座谈谈论会. Beijing. Feb. 2014. Home page On-line. Available: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/eassc_publications/44/, accessed on July 18th, 2014 Han Yi-Shaw. 1999. The Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Its History and an Analysis of the Ownership Claims of the P.R.C., R.O.C., and Japan. in School of Law University of Maryland website. Home page on-line. Available: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1151 context=mscas. Internet; accessed: May 12th, 2014. Ken'ichi Goto, Paul H. Kratoska. 2003. Tensions of empire: Japan and Southeast Asia in the Colonial and Postcolonial World. NUS Press. Keyser, Don. 2013. The Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute: The U.S. policy perspective and Japanese PM Abe’s visit. China Policy Institute Blog. Homepage On-line. Available: http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/chinapolicyinstitute/2013/02/21/the senkakudiaoyu-dispute-the-u-s-policy-perspective-and-japanese-pm-abes-visit/, accessed on July 18th, 2014 Li, Victor. 1975. China and Off-Shore Oil: The Tiao-yü Tai Dispute. Stanford Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, Spring 1975. Manyin, Mark E. 2013. Senkaku (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Islands Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations. Washington: Congressional Research Service. Matsui, Yoshiro. 1997. International Law of Territorial Acquisition and the Dispute over the Senkaku (Diaoyu) Islands. Japanese Annual of International Law, No. 40. pp. 3-31. 101 Moteki, Hiromichi. 2010. The Senkaku Islands Constitute an Intrinsic Part of Japan. Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact. Home page On-line. Available: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/79_S4.pdf, accessed on July 18th, 2014 Naosite: Nagasaki University's Academic Output. Kiyono, ken. 1969. A Study on the Concept