DOCSLIB.ORG

Municipality of Sveti Nikole Project Appraisal Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Municipality of Sveti Nikole Project Appraisal Document Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General description ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Current condition ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.2. Future condition ................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.3. Strategic goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.4 Knowledge and experience of municipality Sveti Nikole ....................................................................................... 14 1.2 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 16 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 17 2.1. General information on the municipality Sveti Nikole ......................................................... 17 2.2. Population and demographic structure ................................................................................ 17 2.3. Demographic profile ............................................................................................................. 17 2.4. Natural resources .................................................................................................................. 19 2.5. Climatic characteristics ......................................................................................................... 19 2.6. Hydrological characteristics .................................................................................................. 20 2.7. Local economic development ............................................................................................... 21 2.8. Agriculture – Development and resources ........................................................................... 21 3. SOCIAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 22 3.1. Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.2. Social diversity and gender ................................................................................................... 23 3.3. Institutions, rules and behavior ............................................................................................ 24 3.4. Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 24 3.5. Citizen’s engagements/ participation ................................................................................... 25 3.6. Social risks ............................................................................................................................. 26 3.7. Other considerations ............................................................................................................ 26 3.8. Resettlement issues .............................................................................................................. 26 3.9. Concluding remarks .............................................................................................................. 26 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................ 27 4.1. Main project activities that have an impact on the environment ........................................ 28 4.2. Major impacts on the environment and sensitive receptors ............................................... 28 4.3. Main environmental impacts in the operational phase ....................................................... 32 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PLAN ......................................................................................... 33 5. Technical solution ......................................................................................................................... 38 5.1. Description ............................................................................................................................ 38 5.1.1. Construction and reconstruction of local streets and street sections ................................................................... 39 5.1.2. Pavement structure and sidewalks ...................................................................................................................... 43 5.1.3. Stormwater drainage system ............................................................................................................................... 44 5.1.4. Pavement structure and sidewalks ...................................................................................................................... 48 5.2. Alternative solutions ............................................................................................................. 51 5.3. Conclusion and recommendations ....................................................................................... 52 6. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 53 6.1. Project costs ............................................................................................................................... 53 6.2. Loan repayment ......................................................................................................................... 53 6.3. Credit capacity ........................................................................................................................... 54 6.4. Financial Analysis of Municipal Capacity to Service Debt .......................................................... 55 6.5. Analysis of the financial feasibility of the project ...................................................................... 57 6.5.1 Time Horizon ....................................................................................................................................................... 57 6.5.2 Limitations of the analysis ................................................................................................................................. 57 6.5.3 Initial Investments ............................................................................................................................................... 57 6.5.4 Inflation ................................................................................................................................................................ 57 6.5.5 Discount rate ....................................................................................................................................................... 57 6.5.6 Projection of operating cash flows ................................................................................................................... 57 6.5.7 Results from financial analysis ......................................................................................................................... 59 6.6. Sensitivity analyses .................................................................................................................... 60 6.7. Concluding Remarks ................................................................................................................... 61 7. Cost Benefit analysis ..................................................................................................................... 62 7.1 General Information ................................................................................................................... 62 7.1.1 Framework of the analysis .................................................................................................................................... 62 7.1.2 Limitations and constraints of the study ................................................................................................................ 62 7.1.3 Scope .................................................................................................................................................................... 63 7.2 Identification of the relevant costs and benefits ........................................................................ 63 7.2.1 Project investment costs ....................................................................................................................................... 63 7.2.2 Project costs and benefits ..................................................................................................................................... 63 7.2.3 Other assumptions ................................................................................................................................................ 67 7.3 Valuation of the Cost and Benefit analysis ................................................................................. 67 7.4 Results of the Cost and Benefit analysis ..................................................................................... 67 7.5 Sensitivity analysis .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bregalnica River Watershed”
    Project Report “Ecological Data Gap Analysis and Ecological Sensitivity Map Development for the Bregalnica River Watershed” Dekons-Ema and Macedonian Ecological Society Book 4 Report on the status of protected areas in Bregalnica watershed Project coordinator: Slavčo Hristovski Director: Menka Spirovska Skopje, December 2015 Report on the status of protected areas in Bregalnica watershed Project implementation: Dekons-Ema and Macedonian Ecological Society Project funding: Center for the development of Eastern Planning Region Editors: Brajanoska Robertina and Slavcho Hristovski Authors: Brajanoska Robertina Valentina Slavevska Daniela Jovanovska Slavcho Hristovski Stamenkovikj Vasko Avukatov Metodija Velevski Nikolcho Velkovski Aleksandar Sarov Mitko Kostadinovski Zlatko Levkov Bogoljub Sterijovski Vlado Matevski Katerina Rusevska Ljiljana Tomovikj Sonja Ivanovska Despina Kitanova Svetlana Pejovikj Vladimir Dzabirski Aleksandar Stojanov Natalija Melovska Ljupcho Melovski Dime Melovski Evgenija Jordanovska Citation: Brajanoska, R., Hristovski, S. eds. (2015). Report on the status of protected areas in Bregalnica watershed. Final report of the project “Ecological Data Gap Analysis and Ecological Sensitivity Map Development for the Bregalnica River Watershed”, Book 4, Skopje. Dekons-Ema Environmental Management Associates Mitropolit Teodosij Gologanov st., 44/4 1000 Skopje [email protected] http://www.ema.com.mk Macedonian Ecological Society Vladimir Nazor st., 10 1000 Skopje [email protected] http://www.mes.org.mk The Report on the status of protected areas in Bregalnica watershed was prepared within the Project " Ecological Data Gap Analysis and Ecological Sensitivity Map Development for the Bregalnica River Watershed ", Contract No., 0205-145/10 of 16.06.2014, signed between the Center for the development of Eastern Planning Region, represented by Dragica Zdraveva, coordinator of the Center and Environmental Management Associates Dekons-Ema represented by Menka Spirovska, Director.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Report No: AUS0001531 . Public Disclosure Authorized Assessment of barriers and opportunities using Gender and Roma lens in North Macedonia: Case of Transport Public Disclosure Authorized May 1, 2020 Transport Global Practice Public Disclosure Authorized . Public Disclosure Authorized . © 2017 The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: “World Bank. {YEAR OF PUBLICATION}. {TITLE}. © World Bank.” All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Table of contents 1 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 3 2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • How We Have Succeeded, Or Why Are We Doing Evaluation Right
    HOW HAVE WE SUCCEEDED, OR WHY ARE WE DOING AN EVALUATION NOW? EVALUATION REPORT ON THE WOMEN’S ORGANIZATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF SVETI NIKOLE (For the period: 1998-2004) External evaluators: Natasa Milenkovic and Aferdita Haxhijaha Imeri Requested by: the Women’s Organization of the Municipality of Sveti Nikole Implementation Period: September 2004 – December 2004 Translation: Natasa Dogramadzieva-Maneva Proofreading: Natasa Milenkovic, Aferdita Haxhijaha Imeri and Tanja Arsic Computer adaptation: Aleksandar Bogatinov Evaluation Report WOM Sveti Nikole 2 Content: 1. Summary 4 2. Organizational context 11 3. Description of the evaluation process 13 3.1 Evaluation particular goals 3.2 Methodology 4. Health program 15 4.1 Lectures and workshops 4.2 Free gynecological checkups 4.3 Self-help group 4.4 Campaign and lobbying 4.5 Survey results: Views of beneficiary vs. non-beneficiary participants 4.6 Health program promotional and educational material 4.7 Health program main achievements 4.8 Health program main recommendations 5. Evaluation of the Organization 28 5.1 Organizational processes 5.2 Internal perception of the organizational structure 5.3 Organizational results 5.4 Cooperation and communication with others 5.5 Press Clipping 5.6 Web page 6. Guidelines for future 37 6.1 Main achievements of the organization 6.2 Main recommendations for the organizational development 7. Recommendations to permanent donor Kvinna till Kvinna 41 Annex 1: WOM Sveti Nikole Developing Matrix for the period 1998 – 2004 42 Evaluation Report WOM Sveti Nikole 3 Acknowledgements We use this opportunity to express our gratitude to the members of the Managing Board and Supervising Committee of the Women’s Organization of the Municipality of Sveti Nikole (hereinafter WOM Sveti Nikole) for their cooperation and the time allocated to us, as evaluators.
    [Show full text]
  • Sveti Nikole
    Republic of Macedonia Municipality Sveti Nikole PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT “Reconstruction of streets, water supply and sewerage system and construction of sidewalks and storm water system in the Municipality Sveti Nikole” World Bank Municipal Services Improvement Project Skopje, March 2015 1 The Project’s Appraisal Document was prepared by the Center for Promotion of Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Rural Development – CeProSARD, with the exception of Environmental Impact section prepared by the MSIP consultant Slavjanka Pejcinovska-Andonova CeProSARD Str. Orce Nikolov 172 1000 Skopje, R. Macedonia Tel/fax: + 389 2 3061 391 http://www.ceprosard.org.mk CeProSARD would like to express many thanks for their generous and immense contribution to: WB MSIP team – PMU office, Skopje Mr. Zoran Tasev All representatives from the municipality staff who help in receiving the appropriate documentation All municipality counselors who participate at the interviews All residents who participate at the focus group Skopje, March 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General Information on the municipality Sveti Nikole .................................................................................... 8 2.2 Demographic and economic profile ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: List of Rural Areas
    Annex 1: List of rural areas Municipality Settlements designated as Rural areas (LAU 2) List of settlement on the level of the municipality with ≤ 30 000 inhabitants (Census 2002) Aerodrom Village: Dolno Lisiche. Arachinovo Villages: Arachinovo, Grushino, Mojanci and Orlanci. Berovo City: Berovo and villages: Budinarci, Vladimirovo, Dvorishte, Machevo, Mitrashinci, Ratevo, Rusinovo and Smojmirovo. Bitola Villages: Bareshani, Bistrica, Bratin Dol, Brusnik, Bukovo, Velushina, Gabalavci, Gopesh, Gorno Egri, Gorno Orizari, Graeshnica, Dihovo, Dolenci, Dolno Egri, Dolno Orizari, Dragarino, Dragozani, Dragosh, Drevenik, Gjavato, Zabeni, Zlokukjani, Kazani, Kanino, Karamani, Kishava, Kravari, Krklino, Kremenica, Krstoar, Kukurechani, Lavci, Lazec, Lera, Lisolaj, Logovardi, Lopatica, Magarevo, Malovishte, Metimir, Medzitlija, Nizepole, Novo Zmirnovo, Oblakovo, Oleveni, Optichari, Orehovo, Ostrec, Poeshevo, Porodin, Ramna, Rashtani, Rotino, Svinishte, Sekirani, Snegovo, Sredno Egri, Srpci, Staro Zmirnovo, Strezevo, Trn, Trnovo, Capari, Crnobuki and Crnovec. Bogdanci City: Bogdanci and villages: Gjavato, Selemli and Stojakovo. Bogovinje Villages: Bogovinje, Gorno Palchishte, Gorno Sedlarce, Dolno Palchishte, Jelovjane, Kamenjane, Zerovjane, Novake, Novo Selo, Pirok, Rakovec, Selce Kech, Sinichane and Urvich. Bosilovo Villages: Borievo, Bosilovo, Gecherlija, Drvosh, Ednokukevo, Ilovica, Monospitovo, Petralinci, Radovo, Robovo, Saraj, Sekirnik, Staro Baldovci, Turnovo, Hamzali and Shtuka. Brvenica Villages: Blace, Brvenica, Volkovija, Gurgurnica,
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of SPATIAL and URBAN PLANNING for BETTER CLIMATE CHANGE MANAGEMENT Author: Biljana Pulevska
    STRATEGIC CONCEPT - THE ROLE OF SPATIAL AND URBAN PLANNING FOR BETTER CLIMATE CHANGE MANAGEMENT Author: Biljana Pulevska november, 2013 CONTENT I. Introduction 5 II. How can spatial and urban planning help cope with the effects of climate change? 6 1. Spatial and urban planning capacity for climate change adaptation 7 2. Spatial and urban planning capacity for climate change mitigation – reduction of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere 11 III. Republic of Macedonia – Spatial and urban planning and climate change 12 1. Legal framework-assessment of the level of good climate change governance through spatial and urban planning 12 2. Questionnaire results – Common characteristics of the Vardar and Southeast Planning Regions 13 IV. Recommendations for the strategic concept 18 APPENDICES 22 APPENDIX 1. TABLE OVERVIEW OF LONG-TERM, MID-TERM AND SHORT- TERM PLANNING DOCUMENTS IN THE AREA OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR THE SOUTHEAST AND VARDAR PLANNING REGIONS – EXCERPT FIELD: SPATIAL PLANNING 22 APPENDIX 2. VARDAR PLANNING REGION – RESULTS FROM THE QUESTIONNAIRE 2 PART 5. SPATIAL AND URBAN PLANNING -NARRATIVE 28 APPENDIX 3. SOUTHEAST PLANNING REGION – RESULTS FROM THE QUESTIONNAIRE 2 PART 5. SPATIAL AND URBAN PLANNING-NARRATIVE 32 3 I. Introduction patial and urban planning aim at regulated by law on the utilisation of land, Scontributing to the sustainable the spatial distribution of business and development of local communities. non-business facilities, the network of Carefully prepared planning documents for settlements, the distribution of traffic and spatial development and landscaping can other infrastructure in the area, strategic help increase the sustainability of spatial assessment of impacts on the environment, development at local level, addressing measures to protect the environment important aspects of climate change and nature, guidelines and measures for adaptation and mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vkupno Naselenie, Doma]Instva I Stanovi Total
    REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA DR@AVEN ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKA REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE POPIS NA NASELENIETO, DOMA]INSTVATA I STANOVITE VO REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA, 2002 definitivni podatoci Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia, 2002 final data VKUPNO NASELENIE, DOMA]INSTVA I STANOVI - DEFINITIVNI PODATOCI PO NASELENI MESTA - VKUPNO NASELENIE SPORED IZJASNUVAWETO ZA NACIONALNATA PRIPADNOST, MAJ^INIOT JAZIK I VEROISPOVEDTA X BOOK X X TOTAL POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS - FINAL DATA BY SETTLEMENTS - TOTAL POPULATION ACCORDING TO THE ETHNIC AFFILIATION, KNIGA KNIGA MOTHER TONGUE AND RELIGION PRI KORISTEWE NA PODATOCITE DA SE NAVEDE IZVOROT: POPIS NA NASELENIETO, DOMA]INSTVATA I STANOVITE VO REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA, 2002 - KNIGA X WHEN USING DATA CONTAINED HERE, PLEASE CITE THE SOURCE AS FOLLOWS: CENSUS OF POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, 2002 - BOOK X Izdava~: DR@AVEN ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKA, "Dame Gruev" - 4, Skopje Publisher: THE STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE, "Dame Gruev" - 4, Skopje Odgovara m-r Don~o Gerasimovski, direktor For the publisher: M.Sc. Donco Gerasimovski, Director Broj na stranici: 470 Number of pages: 470 Pe~ateno vo Pe~atnicata na Slu`bata za op{ti i zaedni~ki raboti pri Vladata na Republika Makedonija Printed in Printing House at General Administration Services at the Government of the Republic of Macedonia Tira`: 500 primeroci Number of copies printed: 500 2 Popis na naselenieto, doma}instvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija, 2002 PREDGOVOR Popisot na naselenieto, doma}instvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija be{e sproveden vo periodot od 1 do 15 noemvri 2002 godina. Podatocite vo popisnite obrasci se zapi{ani so sostojba na den 31 oktomvri 2002 godina vo 24 ~asot, odnosno na polno} pome|u 31 oktomvri i 1 noemvri 2002 godina.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 5: List of Local Administrative Units Eligible Under « Investments in Rural Public Infrastructure » Measure
    Annex 5: List of local administrative units eligible under « Investments in rural public infrastructure » measure Municipality in List of settlements with < 10 000 inhabitants (LAU 2) which settlements (according to 2002 Census) are located Aerodrom Village: Dolno Lisiche. Arachinovo Villages: Arachinovo, Grushino, Mojanci and Orlanci. Berovo City: Berovo and villages: Budinarci, Vladimirovo, Dvorishte, Machevo, Mitrashinci, Ratevo, Rusinovo and Smojmirovo. Bitola Villages: Bareshani, Bistrica, Bratin Dol, Brusnik, Bukovo, Velushina, Gabalavci, Gopesh, Gorno Egri, Gorno Orizari, Graeshnica, Dihovo, Dolenci, Dolno Egri, Dolno Orizari, Dragarino, Dragozani, Dragosh, Drevenik, Gjavato, Zabeni, Zlokukjani, Kazani, Kanino, Karamani, Kishava, Kravari, Krklino, Kremenica, Krstoar, Kukurechani, Lavci, Lazec, Lera, Lisolaj, Logovardi, Lopatica, Magarevo, Malovishte, Metimir, Medzitlija, Nizepole, Novo Zmirnovo, Oblakovo, Oleveni, Optichari, Orehovo, Ostrec, Poeshevo, Porodin, Ramna, Rashtani, Rotino, Svinishte, Sekirani, Snegovo, Sredno Egri, Srpci, Staro Zmirnovo, Strezevo, Trn, Trnovo, Capari, Crnobuki and Crnovec. Bogdanci City: Bogdanci and villages: Gjavato, Selemli and Stojakovo. Bogovinje Villages: Bogovinje, Gorno Palchishte, Gorno Sedlarce, Dolno Palchishte, Jelovjane, Kamenjane, Zerovjane, Novake, Novo Selo, Pirok, Rakovec, Selce Kech, Sinichane and Urvich. Bosilovo Villages: Borievo, Bosilovo, Gecherlija, Drvosh, Ednokukevo, Ilovica, Monospitovo, Petralinci, Radovo, Robovo, Saraj, Sekirnik, Staro Baldovci, Turnovo, Hamzali and Shtuka.
    [Show full text]
  • Rknjiga8sadrzaj
    Sadržaj Žrtve rata 1941-1945 BEROVO........................................................................... 1 Orle................................................................................... 56 Berovo............................................................................... 1 Ostrec............................................................................... 56 Budinarci........................................................................... 1 Paralovo............................................................................ 56 Čiflik.................................................................................. 1 Radobor............................................................................ 56 Crnik................................................................................. 1 Ramna.............................................................................. 56 Dvorište............................................................................. 1 Raštani.............................................................................. 56 Mačevo............................................................................. 1 Rotino................................................................................ 56 Mitrašinci........................................................................... 1 Sekirani............................................................................. 56 Pančarevo......................................................................... 1 Sovič................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Law on Territorial Organization of the Local Self-Government in the Republic of Macedonia
    Republic of Macedonia Government of the Republic of Macedonia Law on Territorial Organization of the Local Self-Government in the Republic of Macedonia 11 December 2003 CONTENTS of the Law on Territorial Organization of the Local Self-Government in the Republic of Macedonia I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 This law regulates the territorial organisation of the local self-government in the Republic of Macedonia, establishes the municipalities, determines the territory of the municipalities and the City of Skopje being a particular unit of local self-government, determines the names, seats and boundaries of the municipalities, determines the type and names of populated places, joining, division and change of boundaries of the municipalities and the City of Skopje, as well as other issues regarding the territorial organisation of the local self- government. Article 2 The establishment of new municipality (joining, division and change of boundaries) and change of the name and seat may be done only with changes and amendments of this law, following prior consultation with the citizens of the respective territory, in a manner determined by law. Article 3 The territory of the municipality covers populated places with cadastre municipalities determined in accordance with a law. Populated place and its cadastre municipality may be a part of one municipality only. Article 4 Boundaries of the municipality are the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities of the populated places that are part of that municipality in the part[s] that border[s] on the adjacent municipalities. 2 Article 5 Each municipality has a name and a seat of municipality. The seat of the municipality is in one of the populated places within that municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Eu
    IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA EU INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION (IPA) RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 (final draft) Skopje, November 2014 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................................6 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................................7 1. TITLE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ........................................................................... 11 2. COUNTRY PROFILE ............................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Geographical area covered by the Programme ............................................................................. 11 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ................................................................................. 12 3.1 General socio-economic context ......................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1 Definition of areas related to Programme implementation ............................................ 12 3.1.2 Demographic situation ................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.3 Administrative system ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]