1 Maccabees: Emotions of Life and Death in Narrative and Lament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Maccabees: Emotions of Life and Death in Narrative and Lament Michael W. Duggan 1 Maccabees: Emotions of Life and Death in Narrative and Lament The author of 1 Maccabees was primarily a historian and secondarily a theolo- gian. His extensive quotations of Israel’s diplomatic correspondence with Rome, Sparta, and the Seleucid monarchs contrast with his few citations of biblical texts. His preoccupation with events supersedes his attention to interpersonal relationships. His narrative consists of action-oriented episodes with a para- mount focus on the uniqueness of each setting in time and place as well as the elaboration of military and diplomatic strategies, movements of armies and peoples, decisions of leaders, and final outcomes. He mentions God sporadical- ly and he references Scripture mostly by allusions. Given the author’s propensity to focus on the external world, his notations of emotions afford rare glimpses of his perceptions into the interior lives of hu- man beings. Moreover, in a sweeping global narrative that surveys the panora- ma of Israel’s landscape and scans the international horizon from Jerusalem to Rome, his references to feelings redirect the reader’s attention to the unique experiences of individuals. Furthermore, his affective language usually exhibits a subtle theological texture. An examination of emotions in 1 Maccabees affords insight into the unique way this historian – who was a Jewish nationalist and Hasmonean advocate – profiles the dispositions of friend and foe at the turn of the first century BCE. I investigate the emotional dynamics of 1 Maccabees by attending to the genres of narrative and lament. I begin with comments on the date, authorship, intention and design of the book as a whole. I then survey the affective contours of the complete narrative by concentrating on the feelings that distinguish the Jewish protagonists from their Jewish and Gentile adversaries. Against this background, I focus on the five laments that punctuate the narrative prior to the opening battle when Judas Maccabeus engages the Seleucid forces at Emmaus (1:24b–28, 36–40; 2:7–13; 3:45, 50b–53; cf. 4:1–25). 1 Authorship, message and design of 1 Maccabees Internal evidence suggests that 1 Maccabees was composed at the beginning of the first century BCE, certainly before Pompey’s siege of Jerusalem in 63 BCE, and DOI 10.1515/9783110369083-007, © 2018 Michael W. Duggan, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. 96 | Michael W. Duggan probably very early in the reign of Alexander Jannaeus as high priest (103–76 BCE).1 The author was a historian (and possibly a diplomat) who wrote 1 Macca- bees to describe the transformation of Israel from a territory under foreign occu- pation into an autonomous nation ruled by Jews.2 He profiles this emerging Jewish state as a legitimate participant in international affairs, both in partner- ships with Rome and Sparta abroad and also in on-going struggles with Syria and Egypt closer to home. He argues that political and cultural nationalism is the heritage the Hasmoneans bequeathed to the Jewish people. The original text in Hebrew was the author’s contribution to the culture of Jewish nationalism. In analogous fashion, the Greek translation fitted nicely into the literary repertoire of Hellenistic Judaism in so far as it reflected the dignity of the Septuagint. This version – which may have been produced under the author’s direction – com- municated to Jewish and Gentile audiences across the Hellenistic world the message that Israel was a player in global politics.3 The author presents the case that Israel’s emergence onto the world stage was due to the courage and acumen of Judas, Jonathan and Simon, who were inspired by their father, Mattathias, to forge an independent Jewish state. In the process, they inaugurated the Hasmonean dynasty.4 The story of this family is the story of Jewish nationalism. The narrative consists of two halves (1:1–9:22; 9:23–16:24), each of which ends with a note on the bravery of a deceased Hasmonean, Judas early on and John Hyrcanus in the end (9:22; 16:23–24).5 The || 1 The thoroughly favourable profile of Roman authorities in 1 Maccabees rules out a date close to Pompey’s invasion of Jerusalem in 63 BCE (cf. 1 Macc 8:1–16, 17–32; 12:1–4; 14:16–19, 40; 15:16). First Maccabees ends with a reference to the posthumous annals of the high priest John Hyrcanus (135–104 BCE), the father of Alexander Jannaeus (1 Macc 16:23–24). On the actual relationship between the Hasmoneans and Rome, see Mandell, Maccabees, 211–220. 2 Judas, his followers, and Simon speak of “our nation” (τοῦ ἔθνους ἡμῶν 3:59; 9:29; 16:3). In official correspondence with Jonathan and Simon, Seleucid kings refer to “your nation” (τὸ ἔθνος σου 10:20; 15:9) and “the nation of the Jews” (τῷ ἔθνει τῶν Ιουδαίων 11:33). The author may have written 1 Maccabees as a polemical defence of the Jewish nation in response to por- trayals of Israel as xenophobic and superstitious by contemporary Greek authors. For example, Posidonius of Apamea and Diodorus Siculus, who were contemporaries of Alexander Jannaeus, lauded Antiochus IV Epiphanes for Hellenizing Jerusalem and Judah. See Barbu, Sacking, 40–42. 3 On the textual issues about the Hebrew original and the Greek translation, see Bartlett, 1 Maccabees, 16–9; deSilva, Massage, 246–247, and Harrington, Invitation, 123. 4 Schwartz (Note, 305–309) suggests that the Hasmoneans were originally powerful landowners in Modein. Goldstein (1 Maccabees, 69–78) views 1 Maccabees as “propaganda” in support of the Hasmonean claims to the high priesthood and regency in Judah. For the priestly heritage of the Hasmoneans according to 1 Maccabees, see Schofield/VanderKam, Hasmoneans, 74–87. 5 Cf. Williams, Structure, 128–137. 1 Maccabees: Emotions of Life and Death in Narrative and Lament | 97 first half unfolds in three parts: (1) a brief overview of the world that Alexander the Great bequeathed to his generals (1:1–9); (2) Mattathias’s revolt against Antiochus IV Epiphanes (1:10–2:70); and (3) the campaigns of Judas Maccabeus (3:1–9:22). The second half also consists of three parts: (1) Jonathan’s regency as high priest (9:23–12:53); (2) Simon’s accomplishments as high priest (13:1– 16:17); and (3) a brief account of John Hyrcanus’s succession to the high priest- hood (16:18–24). Judas is the outstanding protagonist in the first half, whereas Jonathan and Simon share the spotlight in the second half.6 The following ana- lysis will indicate that the language of feelings is more concentrated in the first half than in the second half of the narrative. 2 Emotions in narrative: Jews and their adversaries The author is at pains to distinguish Jews from Gentiles. He identifies “Jews” (οἱ Ιουδαῖοι) as the indigenous residents of Judea and Jerusalem who observe Torah and are loyal to Mattathias and his sons. Their adversaries comprise a variety of groups including (a) Antiochus IV Epiphanes and other Seleucid monarchs, their governors and commanders, and their armies in so far as they are inimical to the Hasmoneans; (b) the surrounding nations that make war on Judas and his brothers (5:24–44; 12:53; cf. 13:6); (c) the Gentiles who inhabit the citadel (ἄκρα); (d) the priest Alcimus and his allies (7:5–25);7 and (e) Jews who are loyal to the Seleucids.8 The author reserves the term “Gentiles” (τὰ ἔθνη) for the non- Jewish adversaries of the Hasmoneans.9 He does not deem all non-Jews as || 6 In summary, the family narrative (1 Macc 2:1–16:22) spans some 33 years from the rebellion of Mattathias (167 BCE) to the campaigns of Judas Maccabeus (166–160 BCE), and subsequently the governance of Judah by his brothers Jonathan (160–142 BCE) and Simon (142–134 BCE), with a final note on the accession of John Hyrcanus to the high priesthood (134 BCE). 7 The author apparently concedes that Alcimus had a licit pedigree for his office (1 Macc 7:14). However, he portrays Alcimus and his followers as “ungodly” since they became allies of the Seleucid governor, Bacchides, against Judas (ἀσεβής 7:5, 9; cf. 7:4–25; 9:1, 54–57). 8 The author variously describes these Jews as “lawless” (παράνομοι 1:11, 34; 10:61; 11:21), “sinners” (ἁμαρτωλοί 1:34; 2:44, 48, 62), and “ungodly Israelites” (ἀσεβῶν ἐξ Ισραηλ 6:21; 7:5, 9; 9:25, 73). For a discussion of Jewish identity in 1 Maccabees, see Scolnic, Mattathias, 476– 483. Bickerman (God, 90–91) views the Maccabean conflict as principally a civil war between observant and unorthodox Jews. 9 The first seven chapters of 1 Maccabees contain 40 of the 42 occurrences, which the NRSV translates τὰ ἔθνη as “Gentiles” (1:11, 13, 14, 15, 42; 2:12, 18, 40, 44, 48, 68; 3:10, 25, 26, 45, 48, 98 | Michael W. Duggan enemies. He speaks favourably about the leaders and populaces of Rome, Spar- ta and other Mediterranean military powers that negotiate pacts of mutual un- derstanding with the Hasmoneans. He never refers to these Hasmonean allies as “Gentiles.” Jews differ from Gentiles in disposition and feeling. 1 Maccabees is the story of the Jews achieving honour to replace their former shame. The author intro- duces this theme in the first three laments (1:24b–28, 36–40; 2:7–13).10 The aim of the Maccabean campaigns is to win honour for God and country. Mattathias establishes adherence to Torah (ὁ νόμος) as the resource that energizes the Jews to attain honour (δοξασθήναι 2:64; cf.
Recommended publications
  • Syllabus, Deuterocanonical Books
    The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Caravaggio. Saint Jerome Writing (oil on canvas), c. 1605-1606. Galleria Borghese, Rome. with Dr. Bill Creasy Copyright © 2021 by Logos Educational Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of this course—audio, video, photography, maps, timelines or other media—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval devices without permission in writing or a licensing agreement from the copyright holder. Scripture texts in this work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the copyright owner. 2 The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Traditional Authors: Various Traditional Dates Written: c. 250-100 B.C. Traditional Periods Covered: c. 250-100 B.C. Introduction The Deuterocanonical books are those books of Scripture written (for the most part) in Greek that are accepted by Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as inspired, but they are not among the 39 books written in Hebrew accepted by Jews, nor are they accepted as Scripture by most Protestant denominations. The deuterocanonical books include: • Tobit • Judith • 1 Maccabees • 2 Maccabees • Wisdom (also called the Wisdom of Solomon) • Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus) • Baruch, (including the Letter of Jeremiah) • Additions to Daniel o “Prayer of Azariah” and the “Song of the Three Holy Children” (Vulgate Daniel 3: 24- 90) o Suzanna (Daniel 13) o Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14) • Additions to Esther Eastern Orthodox churches also include: 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, Odes (which include the “Prayer of Manasseh”) and Psalm 151.
    [Show full text]
  • “Not As the Gentiles”: Sexual Issues at the Interface Between Judaism And
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 16 July 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201807.0284.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Religions 2018, 9, 258; doi:10.3390/rel9090258 Article “Not as the Gentiles”: Sexual Issues at the Interface between Judaism and its Greco-Roman World William Loader, Murdoch University, [email protected] Abstract: Sexual Issues played a significant role in Judaism’s engagement with its Greco-Roman world. This paper will examine that engagement in the Hellenistic Greco-Roman era to the end of the first century CE. In part sexual issues were a key element of demarcation between Jews and the wider community, alongside such matters as circumcision, food laws, sabbath keeping and idolatry. Jewish writers, such as Philo of Alexandria, make much of the alleged sexual profligacy of their Gentile contemporaries, not least in association with wild drunken parties, same-sex relations and pederasty. Jews, including the emerging Christian movement, claimed the moral high ground. In part, however, matters of sexuality were also areas where intercultural influence is evident, such as in the shift in Jewish tradition from polygyny to monogyny, but also in the way Jewish and Christian writers adapted the suspicion and sometimes rejection of passions characteristic of some popular philosophies of their day, seeing them as allies in their moral crusade. Keywords: sexuality; Judaism; Greco-Roman 1. Introduction When the apostle Paul wrote to his recently founded community of believers that they were to behave “not as the Gentiles” in relation to sexual matters (1 Thess 4:5), he was standing in a long tradition of Jews demarcating themselves from their world over sexual issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Canons of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament
    Canons of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament JEWISH TANAKH* PROTESTANT CATHOLIC ORTHODOX OLD TESTAMENT* OLD TESTAMENT* OLD TESTAMENT* Torah (Law or Instruction) The Five Books of Moses Pentateuch Pentateuch Bereshit (In the Beginning) Genesis Genesis Genesis Shemot (Names) Exodus Exodus Exodos VaYiqra (He summoned) Leviticus Leviticus Leuitikon BeMidbar (In the wilderness) Numbers Numbers Arithmoi Devarim (Words) Deuteronomy Deuteronomy Deuteronomion Nevi’im (Prophets) Historical Books Historical Books Histories Iesous Naue Yehoshua (Joshua) Joshua Josue Kritai (Judges) Shofetim (Judges) Judges Judges Routh Shemuel (Samuel) Ruth Ruth 1 Basileion (1 Reigns) Melachim (Kings) 1 Samuel 1 Kings (1 Samuel) 2 Basileion (2 Reigns) 2 Samuel 2 Kings (2 Samuel) 3 Basileion (3 Reigns) Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 1 Kings 3 Kings (1 Kings) 4 Basileion (4 Reigns) Yirmeyahu (Jeremiah) 2 Kings 4 Kings (2 Kings) 1 Paralipomenon (1 Supplements) Yechezkel (Ezekiel) 1 Chronicles 1 Paralipomenon 2 Paralipomenon (2 Supplements) 2 Chronicles 2 Paralipomenon Tere Asar (The Twelve) 1 Esdras (= 3 Esdras in the Ezra 1 Esdras (Ezra) Vulgate; parallels the conclusion Hoshea (Hosea) Nehemiah 2 Esdras (Nehemiah) of 2 Paralipomenon and 2 Esdras) Yoel (Joel) Esther Tobias 2 Esdras (Ezra+Nehemiah) Amos (Amos) Judith Esther (long version) Ovadyah (Obadiah) Poetic and Wisdom Books Esther (long version) Ioudith Yonah (Jonah) 1 Maccabees Job Tobit Michah (Micah) 2 Maccabees Psalms 1 Makkabaion Nachum (Nahum) Proverbs 2 Makkabaion Chavakuk (Habakkuk) Poetic and Wisdom Books Ecclesiastes
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Misreading in 1 Maccabees 7:34 in Light of Its Biblical Model
    JBL 138, no. 4 (2019): 777–789 https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1384.2019.5 Possible Misreading in 1 Maccabees 7:34 in Light of Its Biblical Model matan orian [email protected] Center for the Study of Conversion and Inter-Religious Encounters, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, 8410501, Israel First Maccabees 7:34 employs four verbs to describe the offensive speech by Nicanor, the Seleucid general, addressed to the Jewish elders and priests. The third verb indicates that Nicanor defiled his audience. While this has led scholars to associate 1 Maccabees with the Jewish concept of gentile impurity, several factors suggest that, at this point, an error found its way into the Greek translation from the original Hebrew. The present argument comprises three steps. First, I use the biblical Sennacherib story, featured in the background of the Nicanor episode in 1 Maccabees, as a means of reconstructing the relevant original Hebrew verb employed by 1 Maccabees. Second, I suggest a possible misreading of one letter on the part of the Greek translator. Finally, I propose that a similar, earlier verse in 1 Maccabees, 1:24b, may have been conducive to the translator’s commission of this mistake, thus offering an insight into his way of thinking. I. A Verb Clearly out of Context First Maccabees 7:34 employs four verbs to describe the insulting nature of the speech by Nicanor, the Seleucid general, directed at the Jewish elders and the priests of the Jerusalem temple who emerged from the temple to greet him: “he mocked them, derided them, defiled them, and spoke arrogantly” (ἐμυκτήρισεν αὐτοὺς καὶ κατεγέλασεν αὐτῶν καὶ ἐμίανεν αὐτοὺς καὶ ἐλάλησεν ὑπερηφάνως).1 The third verb, “defile,” plainly differs from the other verbs in this verse: it does not relate to the nature of the speech but rather to a cultic or ritual consequence of some physical act committed by Nicanor.
    [Show full text]
  • Katell Berthelot Introduction
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 21 (2014): 73–85 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.14.001.2780 www.ejournals.eu/electrum JUDAS MACCABEUS’ WARS AGAINST JUDAEA’S NEIGHBOURS IN 1 MACCABEES 5: A REASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE Katell Berthelot CNRS / Aix-Marseille University Abstract: The fi fth chapter of the First Book of Maccabees recounts a whole range of wars waged by Judas Maccabeus against Judaea’s neighbours, who are depicted as threatening the lives of the Jews living in their midst. The account of these punitive expeditions contains the only explicit reference found in the book to an anathema (ḥerem) against a foreign people, a reference which has led some scholars to see Judas as re-enacting the biblical prescription of the ḥerem against the Canaanites. In contrast with this interpretation, the present article argues that the description in 1 Maccabees 5 is highly literary and rhetorical, and that it is part of a strategy which aims at pre- senting Judas as the heir of the fi rst kings of Israel. In particular, a careful literary analysis shows that nearly all the differences between the accounts in 1 and 2 Maccabees can be explained by tak- ing into consideration the project of the author to present Judas’s military expeditions in the light of Saul’s campaigns, following 1 Samuel 10–15 (especially 14:47–48). Given the indebtedness of 1 Maccabees 5 toward such biblical traditions, the historicity of Judas’s wars against Judaea’s neighbours should be re-assessed. Key words: history of Second Temple Judaism, Hasmoneans, 1 Maccabees 5, Judas Maccabeus, wars, biblical models, Saul.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism. Nancy Perkins East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 12-2011 The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism. Nancy Perkins East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Perkins, Nancy, "The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism." (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1397. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1397 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _____________________ by Nancy Perkins December 2011 _____________________ William D. Burgess Jr., PhD, Chair Keith Green, PhD Henry Antkiewicz, PhD Keywords: Book of Enoch, Judaism, Second Temple ABSTRACT The Book of Enoch and Second Temple Judaism by Nancy Perkins This thesis examines the ancient Jewish text the Book of Enoch, the scholarly work done on the text since its discovery in 1773, and its seminal importance to the study of ancient Jewish history. Primary sources for the thesis project are limited to Flavius Josephus and the works of the Old Testament. Modern scholars provide an abundance of secondary information.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripture in the Second Temple Period – from “The Law” to “The Law and the Prophets”
    Scripture in the Second Temple Period – from “the Law” to “the Law and the Prophets” A Mental List – the idea of “Scripture” begins as a rough, somewhat amorphous, mental catalogue of holy writings, which are mostly contained on individual scrolls • The basis for the concept of Scripture is the five “books of Moses” o Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy ▪ These are held by all Jews to be uniquely holy and divinely inspired • In synagogue Judaism, they are joined by the hazy category “and the prophets” The Development of “And the Prophets” (539 BC – 70 AD) • When we today hear the phrase “and the prophets,” we think of the writing prophets of the Old Testament and their “books of prophecy” o Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, “the Twelve,” and Daniel • But ancient Jews commonly had a much more expansive list of “prophets” in mind o Modern Jews designate Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings as the “former prophets” and Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and “the Twelve” as the “latter” ▪ The rest of the modern Jewish Bible is then referred to as “the Writings” • I.e. Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Chronicles o For ancient Jews, the picture is not so clear – personages like Enoch, Abraham, David, Solomon, Job, Daniel, etc. would have been viewed as “prophets” (cf. Acts 2.29-30) – so, if one were to possess authentic writings by (or possibly about) these persons, they might also be considered to be “prophetic” and a part of “the prophets” ▪ E.g. Psalms (for David), Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs (for Solomon), Lamentations (for Jeremiah), etc.
    [Show full text]
  • APOCRYPHA: the HIDDEN WRITINGS ______Men’S Ministries International
    APOCRYPHA: THE HIDDEN WRITINGS _______________________________ Men’s Ministries International Introduction to the Apocrypha I. Introduction to the Holy Scriptures A. Names and Definitions 1. Bible - Greek “biblos” - a book - Matthew 1:2 2. Canon - Greek “kanon” - rule or standard 3. Septuagint - “seventy” - Old Testament in Greek - 180 BC 4. Vulgate - “common” - Old Testament in Latin - 4th Century AD B. Process 1. Revelation - God directly communicates truth not known 2. Inspiration - Spirit-moved people to produce Spirit-breathed readings 3. Illumination - influence of the Holy Spirit for understanding C. Divisions 1. Old Testament - Covenant - 39 books a. The Law - Pentateuch or Torah b. The Prophets -Major/ Minor (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel) c. The Writings 1. Historical - Joshua thru Esther 2. Poetical - Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon 2. New Testament - 27 books a. Gospels d. Pastoral Epistles - 1,2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon b. Acts of the Apostles e. General (Hebrew) Epistles c. Pauline Epistles f. Prophetic - Revelation D. Canonicity 1. Apostolic - Was the book written by an Apostle or someone who knew an Apostle? 2. Spiritual Content - Proven a means of edification? (grace/justification/ holiness) 3. Doctrinal Soundness - Did the book conflict with the other books? 4. Usage - Was the book universally recognized and quoted by the Church Fathers? 5. Divine Inspiration - Did it give true evidence of Divine inspiration? - II Timothy 3:16 II. Introduction to the Apocrypha Books (Old Testament) A. Development 1. None of these books is included in the Hebrew canon of Holy Scriptures 2. Written some time between 300BC and 100AD - Septuagint - inclusive 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Bible Part One: the Canon of the Holy Scriptures
    Mark E. Larson The Making of the Bible Part One: The Canon of the Holy Scriptures Introduction: Do the 66 Books of the Bible Constitute All the Books God Gave Us? A. The “BIBLE” (i.e. the books) is a collection of books given by inspiration of God over the course of 1,500 years. B. Yet how do we know that the books we have today are the ones that should be in the Bible or that other books from ancient times should not be included? 1. Why were so many ancient books excluded? First & Second Books of Adam and Eve, First & Second Books of Enoch, 1 Esdras, 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees. The Gospel of Peter, Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit, Gospel of the Twelve, the Gospel of Basilides, the Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Thomas, Epistle of Barnabas, Gospel of Philip, Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of the Hebrews, the Acts of Paul, the Preaching of Peter. 2. How were the books we have in the Bible chosen in the first place? (Genesis-Revelation) C. Many today claim that we cannot be confident that the Bible is in fact God’s word that the collection of books in it was arbitrarily chosen by men, by assembly counsels, and synods. D. However, there is a way that we can know for sure! 1. The Bible contains God’s plan of salvation! 2. God warns us that no one is to add to His word or take away from it (Deut. 4:2; Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIBLE from God to Us
    THE BIBLE From God to Us JoLynn Gower Spring 2017 493-6151 [email protected] 1 WORD FOR THE JOURNEY 2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. Scripture: graphe: writing, especially the Holy Bible text Inspired by God: theopneustos: God-breathed: the concepts and wording came from God, via the Holy Spirit, to men who wrote it down 2 Peter 1:20-21 But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God APOCRYPHA AND PSEUDEPIGRAPHA 2 OT APOCRYPHA Council of Trent 1546: these approved in Catholic Canon Tobit (200 BC; magic; alms to free from purgatory) Judith (historically inaccurate; may have been a novel) Additions to Esther (Vulgate Esther 10:4–16:24) Wisdom (Wisdom of Solomon) 30 BC; Mary born sinless Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) 132 BC; alms make atonement for sin Baruch, including the Letter of Jeremiah (Additions to Jeremiah in the Septuagint) 150-50 BC; historical errors Additions to Daniel: ... Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children (Vulgate version of Daniel 3:24–90) Susannah (Vulgate Daniel 13, Septuagint prologue) Bel/Dragon (Vulgate Daniel 14, Septuagint epilogue) 1 Maccabees 110 BC; some historical inaccuracies 3 2 Maccabees 110-170 BC; indulgences for the dead REASONS: NOT INCLUDED
    [Show full text]
  • Xeravits, Géza G. "Abraham in the Old Testament Apocrypha." Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature
    Xeravits, Géza G. "Abraham in the Old Testament Apocrypha." Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Ed. Sean A. Adams and Zanne Domoney-Lyttle. London: T&T Clark, 2019. 29–40. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567675545.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 22:19 UTC. Copyright © Sean A. Adams, Zanne Domoney-Lyttle and contributors 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. C h a p t e r 2 A BRAHAM IN THE O LD T ESTAMENT A POCRYPHA * G é z a G . X e r a v i t s Th e patriarch Abraham is one of the most pre- eminent fi gures of the Old Testament. Th e “fi rst Jew,” benefi ciary of God’s promises and covenant is an exciting personality already according to the primary epical source where he fi rst appears (Genesis). It is no wonder that later biblical texts and the authors of the literature of early Judaism were heavily interested in Abraham, and developed a rich tradition around him.1 Th is contribution intends to explore texts that belong to a rather artifi cial category, the Deuterocanonical books or the Old Testament Apocrypha. Th ese late Second Temple period writings do not appear in the Hebrew Bible, but found their way into the Septuagint and its parent versions.2 Th e evidence might be categorized into four distinct groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Hellenism on the Literary Style of 1 and 2 Maccabees
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2017 Apr 20th, 10:30 AM - 11:45 AM The Influence of Hellenism on the Literary Style of 1 and 2 Maccabees Dimitra S. Fellman Riverdale High School Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Fellman, Dimitra S., "The Influence of Hellenism on the Literary Style of 1 and 2 Maccabees" (2017). Young Historians Conference. 16. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2017/oralpres/16 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Fellman 1 Dimitra Fellman Ms. Keldorf Western Civilization 101 7 Nov. 2016 EQ: To what extent were the authors of 1 and 2 Maccabees and the people portrayed in these ​ ​ ​ ​ books influenced by Hellenism in the late 2nd century BCE? The Influence of Hellenism on the Literary Style of 1 and 2 Maccabees ​ ​ ​ It is impossible to understand Jewish identity without delving into the history of diasporas and persecution surrounding their history. Beginning with the Babylonian Captivity and the destruction of the first temple, the Jewish people were dispersed across Europe, Asia and Northern Africa, ruled by vast empires and kings by the likes of The Persian Empire and Alexander the Great, and have historically been a minority.
    [Show full text]