DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Impact Report Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project Napa County, California (State Clearinghouse No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Impact Report Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project Napa County, California (State Clearinghouse No Draft Environmental Impact Report Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project Napa County, California (State Clearinghouse No. 2006092096) CEQA Lead Agency City of St. Helena 1480 Main Street St. Helena, CA 95474 Contact: Jonathon Goldman Director of Public Works/City Engineer 707-968-2658 A Joint Project of the City of St. Helena, Napa County, California U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District, South Pacific Division April 20, 2007 Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Draft EIR City of St. Helena Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Draft EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ ES-1 1 PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Description and Objectives .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Characteristics of the Project Area ........................................................................................... 3 1.4 Project Background and History .............................................................................................. 3 1.5 Environmental Process and Timeline ...................................................................................... 5 1.5.1 Project Sponsors .............................................................................................................. 5 1.5.2 CEQA Lead Agency ....................................................................................................... 5 1.5.3 CEQA Responsible and Trustee Agencies .................................................................. 6 1.5.4 Public Participation and Timeline ................................................................................ 6 1.5.5 Timeline for Project Implementation ........................................................................... 7 1.6 Regulatory Background for the Project ................................................................................... 7 1.6.1 Ecological Permits .......................................................................................................... 7 1.6.2 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ............................................................................. 9 1.6.3 National Historic Preservation Act .............................................................................. 9 1.6.4 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ........................................................................................... 10 1.6.5 California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 .................................................. 10 2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FOR THE PROJECT ................................................................................ 11 2.1 All Alternatives Considered ................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Alternatives Analyzed in DEIR .............................................................................................. 12 2.2.1 No Project ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Small Notch ................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Full Dam Removal ........................................................................................................ 14 2.2.4 Fish Ladder .................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.5 Summary of Alternatives ............................................................................................ 15 2.3 Elements Included in All Action Alternatives ..................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Habitat Restoration ...................................................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Stabilization of Spring Mountain Road ..................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Species of Concern ........................................................................................................ 17 2.3.4 Dewatering .................................................................................................................... 17 2.3.5 Construction Access ..................................................................................................... 17 2.3.6 Sediment Reuse/Disposal ........................................................................................... 17 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ............................. 23 3.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 23 3.1.2 Standards ....................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.3 No Project Alternative: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................... 23 3.1.4 Preferred Alternative – Small Notch: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............ 25 3.1.5 Full Dam Removal: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................................... 26 3.1.6 Fish Ladder: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................... 26 3.1.7 Section References ........................................................................................................ 26 City of St. Helena Page i Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Draft EIR Page 3.2 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.2 Standards ....................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.3 No Project Alternative: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................... 31 3.2.4 Preferred Alternative – Small Notch: Impacts and Mitigation Measures, ........... 33 3.2.5 Full Dam Removal: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................................... 35 3.2.6 Fish Ladder: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................... 36 3.2.7 Section References ........................................................................................................ 36 3.3 Biological Resources ................................................................................................................ 38 3.3.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 38 3.3.2 Standards ....................................................................................................................... 77 3.3.3 No Project Alternative: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................... 78 3.3.4 Preferred Alternative - Small Notch: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............. 86 3.3.5 Full Dam Removal: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................................... 91 3.3.6 Fish Ladder: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................... 92 3.3.7 Section References ........................................................................................................ 93 3.4 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................... 97 3.4.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 97 3.4.2 Standards ....................................................................................................................... 98 3.4.3 No Project Alternative: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................... 98 3.4.4 Preferred Alternative – Small Notch: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............ 98 3.4.5 Full Dam Removal: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................................... 99 3.4.6 Fish Ladder: Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................... 99 3.4.7 Section References ........................................................................................................ 99 3.5 Geology, Soils, Landslides, and Seismic Activity .............................................................. 101 3.5.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................... 101 3.5.2 Standards ..................................................................................................................... 104 3.5.3 No Project Alternative: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................. 105 3.5.4 Preferred Alternative – Small Notch: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......... 105 3.5.5 Full Dam Removal: Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS the VERANDA at INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1
    MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS THE VERANDA AT INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 LINCOLN AVE CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA July 16, 2020 Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Group 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B Napa, California 94559 Attention: Ms. Olivia Ervin Prepared by Monk & Associates, Inc. 1136 Saranap Avenue, Suite Q Walnut Creek, California 94595 Contact: Ms. Sarah Lynch 1136 Saranap Ave., Suite Q Walnut Creek California 94595 (925) 947-4867 FAX (925) 947-1165 Biological Resources Constraints Analysis MONK & ASSOCIATES The Veranda at Indian Springs 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 Lincoln Ave Calistoga, California APNs 011‐034‐003; ‐004; -005; ‐006; ‐021; ‐022; 028; ‐029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................................... 1 3. STUDY METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 1 4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES .................................... 2 4.1 Evaluation for Waters of the U.S. and Waters of the State .................................................... 3 4.1.1 APPLICABILITY TO THE PROJECT SITE..................................................................................... 3 5. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ISSUES .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday August 2, 1995
    8±2±95 Wednesday Vol. 60 No. 148 August 2, 1995 Pages 39241±39624 Briefings on How To Use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC and Atlanta, GA, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 1995 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by Online: the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Telnet swais.access.gpo.gov, login as newuser <enter>, no Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register > Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the password <enter ; or use a modem to call (202) 512±1661, login as swais, no password <enter>, at the second login as regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register > > (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of newuser <enter , no password <enter . Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Assistance with online subscriptions 202±512±1530 20402. Single copies/back copies: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 512±1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Executive Orders and Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Supporting Information
    City of Santa Rosa—Emerald Isle Condominium Project Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix B: Biological Resources Supporting Information FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\3316\33160022\Subsequent MND\33160022 Oakmont Emerald Isle Subsequent MND.docx THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City of Santa Rosa—Emerald Isle Condominium Project Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration B.1 - CNPS and CNDDB Database Results FirstCarbon Solutions Y:\Publications\Client (PN-JN)\3316\33160022\Subsequent MND\33160022 Oakmont Emerald Isle Subsequent MND.docx THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3/22/2019 CNPS Inventory Results Plant List Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants 14 matches found. Click on scientific name for details Search Criteria California Rare Plant Rank is one of [1B, 2B], FESA is one of [Endangered, Threatened], CESA is one of [Endangered, Threatened, Rare], Found in Quads 3812257, 3812256, 3812255, 3812247, 3812246, 3812245, 3812237 3812236 and 3812235; Modify Search Criteria Export to Excel Modify Columns Modify Sort Display Photos Blooming CA Rare State Global Scientific Name Common Name Family Lifeform Period Plant Rank Rank Rank Clara Hunt's milk- Fabaceae annual herb Mar-May 1B.1 S1 G1 Astragalus claranus vetch Blennosperma bakeri Sonoma sunshine Asteraceae annual herb Mar-May 1B.1 S1 G1 Chorizanthe valida Sonoma spineflower Polygonaceae annual herb Jun-Aug 1B.1 S1 G1 Clarkia imbricata Vine Hill clarkia Onagraceae annual herb Jun-Aug 1B.1 S1 G1 Cordylanthus tenuis ssp. annual herb Pennell's bird's-beak Orobanchaceae Jun-Sep 1B.2 S1 G4G5T1 capillaris (hemiparasitic) Delphinium luteum golden larkspur Ranunculaceae perennial herb Mar-May 1B.1 S1 G1 Loch Lomond button- annual / perennial Apiaceae Apr-Jun 1B.1 S1 G1 Eryngium constancei celery herb Lasthenia burkei Burke's goldfields Asteraceae annual herb Apr-Jun 1B.1 S1 G1 Lilium pardalinum ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of North America North of Mexico
    Flora of North America North of Mexico Edited by FLORA OF NORTH AMERICA EDITORIAL COMMITTEE VOLUME 24 MagnoUophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Foaceae, part 1 Edited by Mary E. Barkworth, Kathleen M. Capéis, Sandy Long, Laurel K. Anderton, and Michael B. Piep Illustrated by Cindy Talbot Roché, Linda Ann Vorobik, Sandy Long, Annaliese Miller, Bee F Gunn, and Christine Roberts NEW YORK OXFORD • OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS » 2007 Oxford Univei;sLty Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York /Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto Copyright ©2007 by Utah State University Tlie account of Avena is reproduced by permission of Bernard R. Baum for the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Government of Canada, ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007. The accounts of Arctophila, Dtipontui, Scbizacbne, Vahlodea, xArctodiipontia, and xDiipoa are reproduced by permission of Jacques Cayouette and Stephen J. Darbyshire for the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Government of Canada, ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007. The accounts of Eremopoa, Leitcopoa, Schedoiioms, and xPucciphippsia are reproduced by permission of Stephen J. Darbyshire for the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Government of Canada, ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada, 2007. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Utah State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Arundo Scale, Rhizaspidiotus Donacis
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Release of the Marketing and Regulatory Arundo Scale, Programs Animal and Rhizaspidiotus donacis Plant Health Inspection Service (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), an Insect for Biological Control of Arundo donax (Poaceae) in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, December 2010 Field Release of the Arundo Scale, Rhizaspidiotus donacis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), an Insect for Biological Control of Arundo donax (Poaceae) in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, December 2010 Agency Contact: Shirley Wager-Page, Branch Chief Pest Permitting Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737–1236 __________________________________________________________ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. __________________________________________________________ Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by USDA over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Federal and State-Listed Rare, Endangered, & Threatened
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 1-21-2020 List of the Federal and State-listed Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Plants of California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "List of the Federal and State-listed Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Plants of California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 92. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/92 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA'S FEDERAL AND STATE-LISTED RARE, ENDANGERED, & THREATENED PLANTS Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 21 January 2020 used the names used by the California Natural DEFINITIONS AND NAMES Diversity Database. Federally-listed Plants CONIFERS Under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act, a plant is endangered if it is “in danger of extinction Cupressaceae throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” Hesperocyparis abramsiana var. abramsiana • FT - SE A species is threatened if it is “likely to become an Hesperocyparis abramsiana var. butanoensis • FT - SE endangered species within the foreseeable future Hesperocyparis goveniana • FT throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” FLOWERING PLANTS FE Federally-listed as endangered FT Federally-listed as threatened Amaranthaceae State-listed Plants Atriplex coronata var.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Arundo Wasp, Tetramesa Romana
    Field Release of the Arundo Wasp, Tetramesa romana (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), an Insect for Biological Control of Arundo donax (Poaceae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, April 2009 Field Release of the Arundo Wasp, Tetramesa romana (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), an Insect for Biological Control of Arundo donax (Poaceae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, April 2009 Agency Contact: Shirley Wager-Page, Branch Chief Pest Permitting Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737–1236 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. Mention of companies or commercial products does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees or warrants the standard of any product mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of California Grasses (Poaceae)
    TWO Systematics of California Grasses (Poaceae) PAUL M. PETERSON AND ROBERT J. SORENG The grass family (Poaceae or Gramineae) is the fourth largest relationships among organisms) of the major tribes of flowering plant family in the world and contains about California grasses. 11,000 species in 800 genera worldwide. Twenty-three gen- era contain 100 or more species or about half of all grass Morphology species, and almost half of the 800 genera are monotypic or diatypic, i.e., with only one or two species (Watson and The most important feature of grasses (Poaceae) is a one- Dallwitz 1992, 1999). seeded indéhiscent fruit (seed coat is fused with the ovary Over the last 150 years the grass flora of California has wall), known as a caryopsis or grain (see Figure 2.1; Peterson been the subject of considerable attention by botanists. 2003). The grain endosperm is rich in starch, although it can Bolander (1866) prepared the first comprehensive list, recog- contain protein and significant quantities of lipids. The nizing 112 grasses from California, of which 31 were intro- embryo is located on the basal portion of the caryopsis and ductions. Thurber (1880) mentions 175 grasses in California, contains high levels of protein, fats, and vitamins. The stems and Beetle (1947) enumerates 400 known species. It is inter- are referred to as culms, and the roots are fibrous and princi- esting to note that Crampton (1974) recognized 478 grasses pally adventitious or arising from lower portions of the in California, and of these, 175 were introduced and 156 were culms. Silica-bodies are a conspicuous component of the reported as annuals (we report 152 annuals here).
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Vascular Plants of California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 1-21-2020 A List of the Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Vascular Plants of California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A List of the Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Vascular Plants of California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 90. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/90 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE RARE, ENDANGERED, & THREATENED VASCULAR PLANTS OF CALIFORNIA James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Revised: 21 January 2020 Rare, endangered, and threatened vascular plants Fish and Wildlife to manage rare plant data. In have been the subject of study by federal and state March 2010 the two organizations developed a agencies, by conservation groups, and other private scheme called the California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR). entities. The plants on this list are derived from Each plant is given one of the following codes: three sources: the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (federally-listed), the California Department 1A: plants presumed extirpated in California and of Fish & Wildlife (state-listed), and the California either rare or extinct elsewhere Native Plant Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 1995 / Proposed Rules
    39326 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 1995 / Proposed Rules Species Historic range Family name Status When listed Critical Special Scientific name Common name habitat rules ******* Astragalus Clara Hunt's U.S.A. (CA) ............. Fabaceae ............... E ................... NA NA clarianus. milkvetch. ******* Carex albida ..... White sedge ............ U.S.A. (CA) ............. Cyperaceae ........... E ................... NA NA ******* Clarkia imbricata Vine Hill clarkia ....... U.S.A. (CA) ............. Onagraceae ........... E ................... NA NA ******* Lilium Pitkin Marsh lily ....... U.S.A. (CA) ............. Liliaceae ................. E ................... NA NA pardalinum ssp. pitkinense. ******* Plagiobothrys Calistoga allocarya .. U.S.A. (CA) ............. Boraginaceae ......... E ................... NA NA strictus. ******* Poa napensis ... Napa bluegrass ....... U.S.A. (CA) ............. Poaceae ................. E ................... NA NA ******* Sidalcea Kenwood Marsh U.S.A. (CA) ............. Malvaceae ............. E ................... NA NA oregana ssp. checkermallow. valida. ******* Trifolium Showy Indian clover U.S.A. (CA) ............. Fabaceae ............... E ................... NA NA amoenum. ******* Dated: July 5, 1995. threatened status for Cupressus California, 93003. Comments and Mollie H. Beattie, goveniana ssp. goveniana (Gowen materials received will be available for Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. cypress). The six taxa are found public inspection, by appointment,
    [Show full text]