Site Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Site Assessment 635 Carmel Avenue, Albany, CA 94706 Fingerman Property 1755 South Fork Diamond Mountain Road Calistoga, Napa County BIOLOGICAL HABITAT EVALUATION REPORT PREPARED FOR: Prunuske Chatham, Inc. 400 Morris Street, Suite G Sebastopol, CA 95472 Contact: Carrie Lukacic 707/824-4600 PREPARED BY: Pacific Biology 635 Carmel Avenue Albany, CA 94706 Contact: Josh Phillips 510/527-1008 October 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 1 4.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 5 5.0 EXISTING BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 6 (i) Regional Setting ....................................................................................................................... 6 (ii) Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 7 (iii) Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 7 (iv) Project Site Botanical Resources .......................................................................................... 7 6.0 SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ....................................................................................................... 12 (i) Special-Status Plant Species ................................................................................................. 12 (ii) Special-Status Wildlife Species ............................................................................................ 22 7.0 JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 27 8.0 SENSITIVE PLANT COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................ 28 9.0 WILDLIFE MOVEMENT CORRIDORS .................................................................................... 30 10.0 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................... 31 FIGURES: Figure 1. Regional Location ....................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Project Site................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. Onsite Plant Communities ......................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Local CNDDB Map ................................................................................................................... 14 Appendices: Appendix A: USFWS Species List Appendix B: Resumes Appendix C: Site Photos Appendix D: Plant List 1755 South Fork Diamond Mountain Rd Project i Biological Habitat Evaluation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed project involves the construction of a 3,267 square foot (sf) winery, 5,486 sf of exterior work areas, a 7,134 sf wine cave with three proposed portals, the restoration of the existing pond, and improvements to the driveway entrance. Natural habitats within or immediately boarding the project’s disturbance boundary include fresh emergent wetland (associated with the onsite pond), montane hardwood, annual grassland/ruderal, mixed chaparral, and redwood. The onsite redwood habitat is considered a sensitive plant community by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and portions of the onsite mixed chaparral may be described as Stanford manzanita chaparral, which is also considered a sensitive plant community by the CDFW. The project site provides suitable habitat for special-status plants and two potentially special-status plant species were identified during the August reconnaissance survey – species that appear to match the description of the vegetative characteristics for Napa false indigo (Amorpha californica var. napensis) (CRPR List 1B.2) and Calistoga ceanothus (Ceanothus divergens) (CRPR List 1.B.2) were observed, but the identity of these plants should be confirmed during plant’s flowering phase. Appropriately timed surveys are required to determine if these or other special-status plants occur on the project site. Avoidance measures are also required to prevent impacts to bird species potentially nesting on or near the project site and to protect western pond turtle (should the species occur in the onsite pond). The onsite pond is expected to be under the jurisdiction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the CDFW. The associated wetlands may also be under the jurisdiction of the RWQCB. The pond and associated wetlands are not expected to be under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) because there is no hydrologic connection of the pond to a Waters of the U.S. The potential occurrence of northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), a state and federally threatened species, is addressed in a separate report. 1755 South Fork Diamond Mountain Rd Project ii Biological Habitat Evaluation Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pacific Biology and Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting (VNLC) conducted a biological habitat evaluation of the 1755 South Fork Diamond Mountain Road project site, located in Calistoga, Napa County, California. The evaluation was conducted to identify and characterize onsite and surrounding habitats; to assess the potential of these habitats to support special-status plant and wildlife species; to identify any wetlands, riparian areas, or other sensitive habitats present; to evaluate potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources; and to identify feasible avoidance measures that could be implemented to protect sensitive biological resources. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located at 1755 South Fork Diamond Mountain Road, which is accessed from Diamond Mountain Road via the Saint Helena Highway (CA-29). The project site is located in the hills approximately 2 miles south of Calistoga (Figure 1). The site is in a sparsely developed area and is generally bordered by vineyards and undeveloped lands (including forested and chaparral habitats). The project site is mapped on the Calistoga USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves the construction of a 3,267 square foot (sf) winery, 5,486 sf of exterior work areas, a 7,134 sf wine cave with three proposed portals, and the restoration of the existing pond to be used as a landscape element. Improvements would also be made to the driveway entrance, where the existing driveway meets South Fork Diamond Mountain Road. The approximate disturbance boundaries of the proposed project are shown in Figure 2. The winery will be constructed on an area of the property currently used to house horses. The fenced area includes an onsite barn/storage structure. All winery construction activities will occur within the footprint of the barn and surrounding fenced horse area. The wine cave will be constructed underground with three proposed exit portals. Portal #1 will serve as the primary cave access and will be located immediately adjacent to the winery. The other two portals will be the only other aboveground components of the cave. Construction of the proposed wine cave exit portals will require excavation of the portal, construction of a concrete bulkhead wall, and installation of two 22-foot long entryway wing walls for each portal. Installation of a temporary road will be required to provide access for the excavator and concrete trucks during construction. The temporary access road will be located between the existing unpaved road on the north side of the pond towards the portals, which will be located just below the paved driveway to the residence. The temporary access road will be 1755 South Fork Diamond Mountain Rd Project 1 Biological Habitat Evaluation Report between 10 and 12 feet wide and approximately 55 feet long for Portal #2 and 78 feet long for Portal #3. The area between the two wing walls at each portal will be used for winery guest areas with tables and chairs. The temporary access roads will be converted to narrow walking paths for guests, and the disturbed areas will be restored and planted native vegetation. Spoil material from the cave construction will be used to rehabilitate the existing pond. The pond will be drained. Planting material on the pond bottom will be removed and stored and used as planting medium for pond restoration. Approximately 3,900 cubic yards of spoil material from the wine cave construction will be stockpiled in the drained pond. Once the wine cave is constructed, the pond will be rough graded according to the landscape design and an artificial liner will be placed to stop pond leakage. The spoil material will be spread over the liner. The stored growing medium will be placed and augmented with compost and topsoil. Native grasses and forbs will be
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS the VERANDA at INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1
    MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS THE VERANDA AT INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 LINCOLN AVE CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA July 16, 2020 Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Group 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B Napa, California 94559 Attention: Ms. Olivia Ervin Prepared by Monk & Associates, Inc. 1136 Saranap Avenue, Suite Q Walnut Creek, California 94595 Contact: Ms. Sarah Lynch 1136 Saranap Ave., Suite Q Walnut Creek California 94595 (925) 947-4867 FAX (925) 947-1165 Biological Resources Constraints Analysis MONK & ASSOCIATES The Veranda at Indian Springs 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 Lincoln Ave Calistoga, California APNs 011‐034‐003; ‐004; -005; ‐006; ‐021; ‐022; 028; ‐029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................................... 1 3. STUDY METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 1 4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES .................................... 2 4.1 Evaluation for Waters of the U.S. and Waters of the State .................................................... 3 4.1.1 APPLICABILITY TO THE PROJECT SITE..................................................................................... 3 5. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ISSUES .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Recipients of 5 Star Grant Program (PDF)
    2010 Five Star Recipients Alabama Project Title: Tapawingo Springs Wetlands Restoration (AL) Organization: Freshwater Land Trust Award Amount: $14,980 Project Location: The project is located at the foot of Sand mountain along Tapawingo Road in northeastern Jefferson County, Alabama. Project Description: Conduct riparian wetland habitat restoration of abandoned residential property concentrating on re-establishing wetland hydrology and native species and eradication of invasive species. Project Title: Village Creek Trail and Restoration (AL) Organization: Freshwater Land Trust Award Amount: $20,620 Project Location: Birmingham and Jefferson Counties Project Description: Construct and maintain a trail system along the Village Creek head waters. Project will include invasive plant removal, wetland enhancement, and bioswale construction. California Project Title: Audubon Bobcat Ranch Oak Woodland Corridor (CA) - III Organization: National Audubon Society Award Amount: $40,000 Project Location: Putah Creek Watershed, Yolo County Project Description: Create an ecological connection between the Dry Creek tributaries and the main channel of Putah Creek in Yolo County. Project will create a wild-way managed by landowners. Project Title: Cooley Landing Restoration and Education (CA) Organization: City of East Palo Alto Award Amount: $40,000 Project Location: East Palo Alto and Menlo Park, San Mateo County Project Description: Restore nine acres of upland habitat for endangered clapper rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. Project will create a new passive recreation park and environmental and history education center. Project Title: Cresta Riparian Habitat Enhancement and Education (CA) Organization: Sotoyome Resource Conservation District Award Amount: $20,000 Project Location: Project is located along Porter Creek in the Mayacamas Mountains of northeastern Sonoma County.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL CHANGES in CHANNEL ALIGNMENT Along Lower Laguna De Santa Rosa and Mark West Creek
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN CHANNEL ALIGNMENT along Lower Laguna de Santa Rosa and Mark West Creek PREPARED FOR SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY JUNE 2014 Prepared by: Sean Baumgarten1 Erin Beller1 Robin Grossinger1 Chuck Striplen1 Contributors: Hattie Brown2 Scott Dusterhoff1 Micha Salomon1 Design: Ruth Askevold1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation San Francisco Estuary Institute Publication #715 Suggested Citation: Baumgarten S, EE Beller, RM Grossinger, CS Striplen, H Brown, S Dusterhoff, M Salomon, RA Askevold. 2014. Historical Changes in Channel Alignment along Lower Laguna de Santa Rosa and Mark West Creek. SFEI Publication #715, San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA. Report and GIS layers are available on SFEI’s website, at http://www.sfei.org/ MarkWestHE Permissions rights for images used in this publication have been specifically acquired for one-time use in this publication only. Further use or reproduction is prohibited without express written permission from the responsible source institution. For permissions and reproductions inquiries, please contact the responsible source institution directly. CONTENTS 1. Introduction .....................................................................................1 a. Environmental Setting..........................................................................2 b. Study Area ................................................................................................2 2. Methods ............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Biodiversity Management Plan Pdf
    April 2015 VEGETATION AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Marin County Parks Marin County Open Space District VEGETATION AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Prepared for: Marin County Parks Marin County Open Space District 3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 260 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 473-6387 [email protected] www.marincountyparks.org Prepared by: May & Associates, Inc. Edited by: Gail Slemmer Alternative formats are available upon request TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents GLOSSARY 1. PROJECT INITIATION ...........................................................................................................1-1 The Need for a Plan..................................................................................................................1-1 Overview of the Marin County Open Space District ..............................................................1-1 The Fundamental Challenge Facing Preserve Managers Today ..........................................1-3 Purposes of the Vegetation and Biodiversity Management Plan .....................................1-5 Existing Guidance ....................................................................................................................1-5 Mission and Operation of the Marin County Open Space District .........................................1-5 Governing and Guidance Documents ...................................................................................1-6 Goals for the Vegetation and Biodiversity Management Program ..................................1-8 Summary of the Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Beckstoffer Buys Historic Red Hills Vineyard
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BECKSTOFFER BUYS HISTORIC RED HILLS VINEYARD Beckstoffer Vineyards Purchases the Beringer Clear Mountain Vineyard in the Red Hills of Lake County from Treasury Wine Estates; Renames it Amber Mountain Vineyard January 15, 2019 (Kelseyville, Calif.—January 15, 2019) – Andy Beckstoffer, perhaps the most recognized California grower of wine grapes, announced today that Beckstoffer Vineyards has purchased the 230-acre Clear Mountain Vineyard from Treasury Wine Estates. Beckstoffer will be renaming the vineyard Amber Mountain Vineyard, in recognition of the red volcanic soils of the Red Hills and as a nod to the company’s nearby Red Hills vineyards, Amber Knolls and Crimson Ridge. The vineyard formerly known as Clear Mountain was planted in the 1980’s by Napa’s Beringer Winery and has long been a hallmark for Cabernet Sauvignon production in the Red Hills. Its grape and wine quality influenced Beckstoffer’s decision to begin his Red Hills involvement in 1997, which subsequently began the modern era of premium vineyard plantings in Lake County. Since then, Beckstoffer has steadfastly been committed to proving that the Red Hills can produce ultra-premium Cabernet rivaling the best that California has to offer. After first purchasing land in the Red Hills in 1997, in 2004, Andy Beckstoffer and a group of growers established the Red Hills AVA in 2004. In 2016 Beckstoffer Vineyards announced a new Red Hills wine quality research program with outstanding Cabernet Sauvignon winemakers, the results of which shall be announced later in 2019. Additionally, in 2018, Beckstoffer Vineyards further staked its claim in the area, opening their Red Hills Station office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biological Resources Section Provides Background Information
    4.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Biological resources section provides background information on sensitive biological resources within Napa County, the regulations and programs that provide for their protection, and an assessment of the potential impacts to biological resources of implementing the Napa County General Plan Update. This section is based upon information presented in the Biological Resources Chapter of the Napa County Baseline Data Report (Napa County, BDR 2005). Additional information on the topics presented herein can be found in these documents. Both documents are incorporated into this section by reference. This section addresses biological resources other than fisheries which are separately addressed in Section 4.6. 4.5.1 SETTING REGIONAL SETTING The Napa County is located in the Coast Ranges Geomorphic Province. This province is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean and on the east by the Great Valley geomorphic province. A dominant characteristic of the Coast Ranges Province is the general northwest- southeast orientation of its valleys and ridgelines. In Napa County, located in the eastern, central section of the province, this trend consists of a series of long, linear, major and lesser valleys, separated by steep, rugged ridge and hill systems of moderate relief that have been deeply incised by their drainage systems. The County is located within the California Floristic Province, the portion of the state west of the Sierra Crest that is known to be particularly rich in endemic plant species (Hickman 1993, Stein et al. 2000). LOCAL SETTING The County’s highest topographic feature is Mount St. Helena, which is located in the northwest corner of the County and whose peak elevation is 4,343 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • California Lilac Ceanothus Divergens Rating: 0.0 ( 0 Votes)
    California lilac Ceanothus divergens Rating: 0.0 ( 0 votes) This description is for California lilac (Ceanothus divergens): The distinctly toothed, oval-shaped leaves of ceanothus divergens, which is commonly known as calistoga ceanothus are a very eye-catching feature in and of themselves, while also serving as a pretty backdrop to this shrub’s striking blue or purple flowers that are produced in dense clusters. Calistoga ceanothus appreciates a well-drained loamy or sandy soil and is best grown in an area that receives full sunlight, though it will grow in partial shade too. This shrub is fantastic for incredible-looking groundcover and also looks delightful at the edge of a woodland garden. Find California lilac in our Shop! Free shipping from € 50! Plant Environment Usage Known dangers? Acidity Standard category no Neutral Trees & shrubs Alkaline Shrubs Height [m] Hardiness zone Grown for 1 Z8-10 Attractive Flowers Spread [m] Heat zone Creative category 1.5 H10-8 Kid Approved For Beginners Colours For every season Dominant flower colour Winter temperatures [°C] Garden type Blue -12 - 4 Cottage garden Coastal City Mediterranean garden Gravel garden Plant Environment Usage Flower Fragrance Heat days Garden spaces No, neutral please 90 - 180 Walls, trellises and pergolas Borders Flowering seasons Moisture Gardening expertise Early spring well-drained beginner Mid spring well-drained but frequently watered Late spring Foliage in spring Soil type Time to reach full size Green sandy up to 10 years chalky loams Foliage in summer Sun requirements Green Full sun Foliage in Autumn Exposure Green Sheltered Foliage in winter Green Propagation methods semi-ripe cuttings seed Growth habit Spreading .
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 4.2 Biological Resources Assessment Biological Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX 4.2 Biological Resources Assessment Biological Resources Assessment GREEN VALLEY II FAIRFIELD PROJECT (APNs: 0148-540-270, 0148-540-300) FAIRFIELD, SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Karen Garrett The Spanos Corporation 10100 Trinity Parkway, Suite 500 Stockton, CA 95219 WRA Contacts: Doug Spicher [email protected] Scott Batiuk [email protected] Date: March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Area Description ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Proposed Land Uses.............................................................................................. 1 2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 6 2.1 Sensitive Biological Communities .......................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Waters of the United States ............................................................................ 6 2.1.2 Waters of the State .......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Other Sensitive Biological Communities ......................................................... 6 2.1.4 Relevant Local Policies, Ordinances, and Regulations ................................... 7 2.2 Special-Status Species and Critical Habitat ........................................................... 7 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday August 2, 1995
    8±2±95 Wednesday Vol. 60 No. 148 August 2, 1995 Pages 39241±39624 Briefings on How To Use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC and Atlanta, GA, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 1995 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by Online: the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Telnet swais.access.gpo.gov, login as newuser <enter>, no Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register > Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the password <enter ; or use a modem to call (202) 512±1661, login as swais, no password <enter>, at the second login as regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register > > (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of newuser <enter , no password <enter . Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Assistance with online subscriptions 202±512±1530 20402. Single copies/back copies: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 512±1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Executive Orders and Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest.
    [Show full text]