DOCSLIB.ORG

Judgement Of: 29 May 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judgement Of: 29 May 2013 IT-04-74-T 607/78692 BIS UNITED D607- 494/78692 BIS NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-04-74-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date : 29 May 2013 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia ENGLISH since 1991 Original : French IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Árpád Prandler Judge Stefan Trechsel Reserve Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Registrar: Mr John Hocking Judgement of: 29 May 2013 THE PROSECUTOR v. Jadranko PRLIĆ Bruno STOJIĆ Slobodan PRALJAK Milivoj PETKOVIĆ Valentin ĆORIĆ Berislav PUŠIĆ PUBLIC JUDGEMENT Volume 5 of 6 The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr Kenneth Scott Mr Douglas Stringer Mr Roeland Bos Mr Pieter Kruger Ms Kimberly West Counsel for the Accused: Mr Michael Karnavas and Ms Suzana Tomanović for Jadranko Prlić Ms Senka Noţica and Mr Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stojić Ms Nika Pinter and Ms Natacha Fauveau-Ivanović for Slobodan Praljak Ms Vesna Alaburić and Mr Guénaël Mettraux for Milivoj Petković Ms Dijana Tomašegović-Tomić and Mr Draţen Plavec for Valentin Ćorić Mr Fahrudin Ibrišimović and Mr Roger Sahota for Berislav Pušić 606/78692 BIS Table of Contents ANNEX 1: GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 ANNEX 2: PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 20 I. Appointment of Judges and Competent Chambers ........................................................................................................20 II. Appointment of Counsel for the Accused ....................................................................................................................20 III. Pre-Trial Proceedings ..................................................................................................................................................24 A. Initial Indictment .....................................................................................................................................................24 B. Preliminary Motions Alleging Defects in the Form of the Indictment ....................................................................26 C. Preliminary Motions Challenging Jurisdiction ........................................................................................................28 D. Amended Indictment ...............................................................................................................................................30 E. Transfer and Initial Appearance ...............................................................................................................................31 F. Detention and Provisional Release ...........................................................................................................................32 G. Status Conferences ..................................................................................................................................................32 H. Filing of Pre-Trial Briefs .........................................................................................................................................32 I. Judicial Notice ..........................................................................................................................................................33 IV. On-Site Visit ...............................................................................................................................................................33 V. Trial Proceedings .........................................................................................................................................................34 A. Presentation of Prosecution and Defence Evidence ................................................................................................35 1. Presentation of the Prosecution Case ...................................................................................................................35 2. Presentation of the Defence Cases .......................................................................................................................37 B. Adoption of Guidelines for the Conduct of Trial Proceedings ................................................................................40 C. Duration and Scope of Cross-Examination and Re-Examination ............................................................................42 1. Duration of Cross-Examination ...........................................................................................................................42 2. Scope of Cross-Examination ...............................................................................................................................44 3. Scope of Re-Examination ....................................................................................................................................44 D. Judicial Notice .........................................................................................................................................................45 E. Request of the Republic of Croatia to Appear as Amicus Curiae ............................................................................45 F. Rule 98 bis Decision ................................................................................................................................................46 G. New Amended Indictment .......................................................................................................................................46 H. Replies .....................................................................................................................................................................47 I. Reopening of Cases ...................................................................................................................................................48 J. Request by the Prlić and Praljak Defence Teams for Disqualification of a Judge ....................................................49 K. Final Trial Briefs and Closing Arguments...............................................................................................................51 L. Provisional Releases ................................................................................................................................................52 1. List of Decisions on Requests for Provisional Release Rendered During Summer or Winter Judicial Recesses at the Tribunal ..........................................................................................................................................56 2. List of Decisions on Requests for Provisional Release Rendered During Periods of Adjournment ....................63 3. List of Decisions on Requests for Provisional Release Rendered Pending Delivery of Judgement Pursuant to Rule 65 (B) of the Rules as Amended on 28 October 2011 ..................................................................64 ANNEX 3: MAPS REGARDING THE MUNICIPALITY OF MOSTAR .............................................. 69 I. Important Locations in West Mostar .............................................................................................................................69 II. Mosques Destroyed or Significantly Damaged During the Siege of East Mostar ........................................................72 ANNEX 4: LIST OF WITNESSES .............................................................................................................. 74 SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TRECHSEL: RECKLESSNESS, DOLUS EVENTUALIS, INDIRECT INTENT ................................................................................................................................... 107 DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TRECHSEL: FORCED LABOUR PERFORMED BY NIHAD KOVAĈ, LEGAL FINDINGS REGARDING THE MUNICIPALITY OF JABLANICA (SOVIĆI AND DOLJANI) (COUNTS 15, 16 AND 17). ........................................................................... 112 Case No. IT-04-74-T i 29 May 2013 605/78692 BIS ANNEX 1: GLOSSARY Terms and Abbreviations Pertaining to the Trial Accused Ćorić Valentin Ćorić Accused Petković Milivoj Petković Accused Praljak Slobodan Praljak Accused Prlić Jadranko Prlić Accused Pušić Berislav Pušić Accused Stojić Bruno Stojić Appeals Chamber Appeals Chamber of the Tribunal Ćorić Defence Counsel for the Accused Ćorić Defence(s) Ćorić Defence, Petković Defence, Praljak Defence, Prlić Defence, Pušić Defence and Stojić Defence Indictment "Second Amended Indictment", public, 11 June 2008, superseding the "Indictment", public, 3 March 2004 and the "Amended Indictment”, public, 16 November 2005 Petković Defence Counsel for the Accused Petković Praljak Defence Counsel for the Accused Praljak Prlić Defence Counsel for the Accused Prlić Prosecution Office of the Prosecutor of the Tribunal Pušić Defence Counsel for the Accused Pušić Stojić Defence Counsel for the Accused Stojić The Accused Valentin Ćorić, Milivoj Petković, Slobodan Praljak, Jadranko Prlić, Berislav Pušić and Bruno Stojić Case No. IT-04-74-T 1 29 May 2013 604/78692 BIS Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief The Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković, Valentin Ćorić and Berislav Pušić, Case No. IT-04-74-PT, "Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief", partly confidential, 19 January 2006, and "Prosecution Submission of Pre-Trial Brief with Exhibit Numbers", public, 2 June 2006
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Icty Weekly Update –
    UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL PÉNAL INTERNATIONAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA POUR L’EX-YOUGOSLAVIE 7 April 2006 77 Apprriill 22000066 IICCTTYY WWEEEEKKLLYY UUPPDDAATTEE –– 339966 PROCEDURAL DEVELOPMENTS I. OVERVIEW OF COURT PROCEEDINGS MARTI] Case Trial Chamber I – Judges Moloto (Presiding), Nosworthy and Höpfel Continuation of the Prosecution case From 3 April until 4 April 2006, the following witness was examined by the Prosecution and subsequently cross-examined by the Defence: Witness MM-079 On 4 April 2006, the following witness was examined by the Prosecution and subsequently cross- examined by the Defence: Witness MM-036 On 5 April, the following witness was examined by the Prosecution and on 7 April 2006 cross-examined by the Defence: Witness Luka Brki} (eye-witness from the village of [kabrnja, Croatia) From 6 April until 7 April, the following witness was examined by the Prosecution, subsequently cross- examined by the Defence and then re-examined by the Prosecution: Witness Josip Josipovi} (member of the Croatian forces in the city of Dubica during the relevant period) MRK[I] et al. Case Trial Chamber II - Judges Parker (Presiding), Thelin and Van Den Wyngaert Continuation of the Prosecution case On 3 April 2006, the following witness was cross-examined by the Defence and then re-examined by the Prosecution: Witness Jan Alan Schou (member of the European Community Monitoring Mission in Croatia during the relevant period) On 4 April 2006, the following witness was examined by the Prosecution,
    [Show full text]
  • Ashton B. Carter, William J. Perry (1999). Preventive Defense
    list’ contains the most dangerous threats to the existence of the USA and Western world. The former Soviet Union had the Ashton B. Carter, William J. Perry capability to destroy Western values and (1999). Preventive Defense: A Western order, but such an enemy to the New Security Strategy for West no longer exists. The major part of US America. defense planning is now directed towards maintaining the capability to wage two Washington: Brookings Institution major theater wars. Such regional contin- Press. pp. 243. gencies might endanger American interests ISBN 0-8157-1308-8 and security, but would not question the existence of the United States. Therefore, wars of this type can be categorized in belonging to the ’B-list’ of threats. Public The United States of America is found- interest seems to be oriented mostly ing its national security and military strate- towards the activities that deal with the ’C- gies on three groups of activities, called list’ of threats, like those in Bosnia- preparing, shaping and responding. Herzegovina or Kosovo. However, the ’A- Responding capability refers to current list’ may not remain clear forever. One of readiness of the armed forces to engage the most important goals of the American and successfully annihilate open threats to security system is to keep the ’A-list’ clear national security. That readiness was as long as possible. Dr Perry and Dr Carter assessed during the nineties according to argue that this is the essential element of the military capability in successfully waging the preventive defense strategy, which they and winning two almost simultaneous major theoretically developed at Harvard and theater wars, like the one in Korea and in Stanford universities and practically The Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Croats Under the Rulers of the Croatian National Dynasty
    THE CROATS Fourteen Centuries of Perseverance Publisher Croatian World Congress (CWC) Editor: Šimun Šito Ćorić Text and Selection of Illustrations Anđelko Mijatović Ivan Bekavac Cover Illustration The History of the Croats, sculpture by Ivan Meštrović Copyright Croatian World Congress (CWC), 2018 Print ITG d.o.o. Zagreb Zagreb, 2018 This book has been published with the support of the Croatian Ministry of culture Cataloguing-in-Publication data available in the Online Catalogue of the National and University Library in Zagreb under CIP record 001012762 ISBN 978-953-48326-2-2 (print) 1 The Croats under the Rulers of the Croatian National Dynasty The Croats are one of the oldest European peoples. They arrived in an organized manner to the eastern Adriatic coast and the re- gion bordered by the Drina, Drava and Danube rivers in the first half of the seventh century, during the time of major Avar-Byzan- tine Wars and general upheavals in Europe. In the territory where they settled, they organized During the reign of Prince themselves into three political entities, based on the previ­ Branimir, Pope John VIII, ous Roman administrative organizations: White (western) the universal authority at Croatia, commonly referred to as Dalmatian Croatia, and Red the time, granted (southern) Croatia, both of which were under Byzantine su­ Croatia international premacy, and Pannonian Croatia, which was under Avar su­ recognition. premacy. The Croats in Pannonian Croatia became Frankish vassals at the end of the eighth century, while those in Dalmatia came under Frankish rule at the beginning of the ninth century, and those in Red Croatia remained under Byzantine supremacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical and Urban Changes in Sarajevo (1995 – 2015)
    Geopolitical and urban changes in Sarajevo (1995 – 2015) Jordi Martín i Díaz Aquesta tesi doctoral està subjecta a la llicència Reconeixement- NoComercial – SenseObraDerivada 3.0. Espanya de Creative Commons. Esta tesis doctoral está sujeta a la licencia Reconocimiento - NoComercial – SinObraDerivada 3.0. España de Creative Commons. This doctoral thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0. Spain License. Facultat de Geografia i Història Departament de Geografia Programa de Doctorat “Geografia, planificació territorial i gestió ambiental” Tesi doctoral Geopolitical and urban changes in Sarajevo (1995 – 2015) del candidat a optar al Títol de Doctor en Geografia, Planificació Territorial i Gestió Ambiental Jordi Martín i Díaz Directors Dr. Carles Carreras i Verdaguer Dr. Nihad Čengi ć Tutor Dr. Carles Carreras i Verdaguer Barcelona, 2017 This dissertation has been funded by the Program Formación del Profesorado Universitario of the Spanish Ministry of Education, fellowship reference (AP2010- 3873). Als meus pares i al meu germà. Table of contents Aknowledgments Abstract About this project 1. Theoretical and conceptual approach 15 Socialist and post-socialist cities 19 The question of ethno-territorialities 26 Regarding international intervention in post-war contexts 30 Methodological approach 37 Information gathering and techniques 40 Structure of the dissertation 44 2. The destruction and division of Sarajevo 45 Sarajevo: common life and urban expansion until early 1990s 45 The urban expansion 48 The emergence of political pluralism 55 Towards the ethnic division of Sarajevo: SDS’s ethno-territorialisation campaign and the international partiality in the crisis 63 The Western policy towards Yugoslavia: paving the way for the violent ethnic division of Bosnia 73 The siege of Sarajevo 77 Deprivation, physical destruction and displacement 82 The international response to the siege 85 SDA performance 88 Sarajevo’s ethno-territorial division in the Dayton Peace Agreement 92 The DPA and the OHR’s mission 95 3.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-01-48-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 16 November 2005 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER I, SECTION A Before: Judge Liu Daqun, Presiding Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Judge Amin El Mahdi Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 16 November 2005 PROSECUTOR v. SEFER HALILOVIĆ JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Philip Weiner Ms. Sureta Chana Mr. David Re Mr. Manoj Sachdeva Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Peter Morrissey Mr. Guénaël Mettraux I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. THE ACCUSED SEFER HALILOVIĆ.................................................................................................1 B. OVERVIEW OF THE CASE AGAINST SEFER HALILOVIĆ..................................................................1 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE ...4 III. APPLICABLE LAW...................................................................................................................8 A. LAW ON ARTICLE 3 OF THE STATUTE...........................................................................................8 1. General Requirements of Article 3 of the Statute....................................................................8 (a) The Existence of an Armed Conflict and Nexus of the Alleged Crimes with the
    [Show full text]
  • It-04-74-T 607/78692 Bis United D607- 494/78692 Bis
    IT-04-74-T 607/78692 BIS UNITED D607- 494/78692 BIS NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-04-74-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date : 29 May 2013 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia ENGLISH since 1991 Original : French IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Árpád Prandler Judge Stefan Trechsel Reserve Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Registrar: Mr John Hocking Judgement of: 29 May 2013 THE PROSECUTOR v. Jadranko PRLIĆ Bruno STOJIĆ Slobodan PRALJAK Milivoj PETKOVIĆ Valentin ĆORIĆ Berislav PUŠIĆ PUBLIC JUDGEMENT Volume 5 of 6 The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr Kenneth Scott Mr Douglas Stringer Mr Roeland Bos Mr Pieter Kruger Ms Kimberly West Counsel for the Accused: Mr Michael Karnavas and Ms Suzana Tomanović for Jadranko Prlić Ms Senka Noţica and Mr Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stojić Ms Nika Pinter and Ms Natacha Fauveau-Ivanović for Slobodan Praljak Ms Vesna Alaburić and Mr Guénaël Mettraux for Milivoj Petković Ms Dijana Tomašegović-Tomić and Mr Draţen Plavec for Valentin Ćorić Mr Fahrudin Ibrišimović and Mr Roger Sahota for Berislav Pušić 606/78692 BIS Table of Contents ANNEX 1: GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 ANNEX 2: PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 20 I. Appointment of Judges and Competent Chambers ........................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-13/1-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 27 September 2007 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Kevin Parker, Presiding Judge Christine Van Den Wyngaert Judge Krister Thelin Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 27 September 2007 PROSECUTOR v. MILE MRK[I] MIROSLAV RADI] VESELIN [LJIVAN^ANIN PUBLIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr Marks Moore Mr Philip Weiner Mr Bill Smith Mr Vincent Lunny Ms Meritxell Regue Mr Alexis Demirdjian Counsel for the Accused: Mr Miroslav Vasi} and Mr Vladimir Domazet for Mile Mrk{i} Mr Borivoje Borovi} and Ms Mira Tapu{kovi} for Miroslav Radi} Mr Novak Luki} and Mr Mom~ilo Bulatovi} for Veselin [ljivan~anin CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE........................5 III. CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................8 IV. COMMAND STRUCTURE OF SERB FORCES INVOLVED IN VUKOVAR OPERATIONS ..........................................................................................................................23 A. GUARDS MOTORISED BRIGADE (“GMTBR”)................................................................................23 B. OPERATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-00-39 & 40-PT THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED CONSOLIDATED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. Momcilo KRAJISNIK, son of Sreten and Milka (née Spiric) was born on 20 January 1945 in Zabrdje, municipality of Novi Grad, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He was a leading member of the Serbian Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina ("SDS") and he served on a number of SDS bodies and committees. On 12 July 1991, Momcilo KRAJISNIK was elected to the Main Board of the SDS. He was President of the Assembly of Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina ("Bosnian Serb Assembly") from 24 October 1991 until at least November 1995. He was a member of the National Security Council of the Bosnian Serb Republic and from the beginning of June 1992 until 17 December 1992, he was a member of the expanded Presidency of the Bosnian Serb Republic. 2. Biljana PLAVSIC, daughter of Svetislav, was born on 7 July 1930 in Tuzla, Tuzla municipality, Bosnia and Herzegovina. She was a leading member of the SDS from the period of its establishment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. From 18 November 1990 until April 1992, Biljana PLAVSIC was a member of the collective Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Sveučilište U Zagrebu Medicinski Fakultet
    SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU MEDICINSKI FAKULTET Prijedlog sveučilišnog poslijediplomskog specijalističkog studija KLINIČKA MIKROBIOLOGIJA Zagreb, lipanj 2013. SADRŽAJ 1. UVOD 1.1. Osnovni podaci o visokom učilištu 1.2. Tijelo koje je odobrilo pokretanje novog studijskog programa 1.3. Popis nastavnika koji su sudjelovali u izradi elaborata 1.4. Razlozi za pokretanje studija 2. INSTITUCIJSKE PRETPOSTAVKE 3. OPĆI DIO 3.1. Naziv studija 3.2. Nositelj studija i izvođač studija 3.3. Tip studijskog programa 3.4 Razina 3.5. Znanstveno ili umjetničko područje 3.6. Znanstveno ili umjetničko polje 3.7. Znanstvena ili umjetnička grana 3.8. Uvjeti upisa na studij 3.9. Trajanje studija 3.10. Ukupan broj ECTS bodova 3.11. Akademski naziv koji se stječe završetkom studija 3.12. Kompetencije koje polaznik stječe završetkom studija 3.13. Otvorenost studija prema pokretljivosti studenata 3.14. Povezanost s temeljnim i modernim vještinama i strukom 3.15. Povezanost studija s potrebama lokalne zajednice 3.16. Zapošljivost studenata nakon završenog studija 3.17. Usporedba s inozemnim akreditiranim programima zemalja Europske unije 3.18. Dosadašnja iskustva predlagača u provođenju ekvivalentnih ili sličnih programa 3.19. Međunarodna suradnja 4. OPIS PROGRAMA 4.1. Popis obveznih i izbornih predmeta s brojem sati aktivne nastave potrebnih za njihovu izvedbu i brojem ECTS-bodova 4.2. Struktura studija, ritam studiranja i obveze studenata 4.2.1. Struktura studija 4.2.2. Ritam studiranja 4.2.3. Obveze polaznika u studiranju 4.3. Popis predmeta i/ili modula koje studenti mogu izabrati s drugih poslijediplomskih studija 4.4. Popis predmeta i/ili modula koji se mogu izvoditi na stranom jeziku 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Hrvatska Sveučilišta “100 Godina Uspjeha Zagrebačke Medicine”
    UGLED STEČEN Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu svoj je nacionalni i međunarodni ugled od samoga početka stjecao vrsnoćom obrazovnoga, znanstvenoga i stručnoga djelovanja. Pridržavao se pri IZVRSNOŠĆU tom najbolje međunarodne prakse u uvođenju visokih obrazovnih standarda, poticanju znan- OBRAZOVNOGA stvenih istraživanja i objavljivanju njihovih rezultata, primjeni novih kliničkih spoznaja i metoda I ZNANSTVENOG te razvoju javne zdravstvene službe. Znanstveno se djelovanje Medicinskoga fakulteta uvijek RADA odvijalo u skladu s činjenicom po kojoj su medicinsko obrazovanje i znanstveno istraživanje čvrsto povezani i po kojoj je prijenos znanstvenih spoznaja u nastavu i kliničku praksu predu- vjet uspješnog akademskog djelovanja. Nastavak na 6. str. hrvatska GODINA I. BROJ 2 sveučilišta 27. PROSINCA Autor fotografija Damir Humski 2017. MEDICINSKI FAKULTET SVEUČILIŠTA U ZAGREBU 1917. – 2017. PORUKE I POUKE STOGODIŠNJEG KALENDARA Stogodišnjica Medicinskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu priča je s porukom i poukom. Uzorno organiziranim obilježavanjem ovog jubileja poslana je upečatljiva poruka o vitalnoj nacionalnoj važnosti akademske zajednice, poruka podjednako upućena kako samoj toj zajednici tako i svima koji sudjeluju u vođenju hrvatske Države. A dvije glavne pouke također se tiču i države i akademske zajednice. Prva je da ni nesloboda – današnji značaj: besparica – ne smije postati izlika za nerad i nepromišljenost. Druga je pouka da bez solidarnosti – Papa Frane rekao bi „milosrđa“, a naš Ustav kaže „socijalne države“ – moć znanosti, obrazovanja i državne prisile postaje ne samo bez-smislena nego i opasna. Vitalna nacionalna važnost akademske zajednice u slučaju zagrebačke Medicine očituje se, prvo, u višestoljetnom otporu tuđinskih vladara da se dopusti osnivanje ustanove u kojoj bi nacionalna elita samostalno brinula o zdravlju vlastitog naroda.
    [Show full text]
  • II Hrvatski Kongres Vojne Medicine
    II hrvatski kongres vojne medicine zbornik sažetaka Zagreb 20.-22.listopad 2005. god. II hrvatski kongres vojne medicine Pokrovitelji Akademija medicinskih znanosti Hrvatske Grad Zagreb Ministarstvo zdravstva i socijalne skrbi RH Ministarstvo obrane RH Organizator Hrvatsko društvo za vojnu medicinu Hrvatskog liječničkog zbora Suorganizatori Sanitetska uprava OSRH Služba za zdravstvenu zaštitu MORH-a Udruga hrvatskih liječnika dragovoljaca Domovinskog rata 1990.-1991. Predsjednik kongresa Drago Prgomet Tajnici kongresa Renato Mittermayer Nada Debač Rizničar Silvana Duvančić Ričko Počasni odbor Milan Bandić, Zdravko Brzović, Goran Dodig, Krešimir Glavina, Andrija Hebrang, Neven Ljubičić, Juraj Njavro, Ivan Prodan, Željko Reiner, Berislav Rončević, Hrvoje Šobat Organizacijski odbor Snježana Grđan, Vladimir Janđel, Vesna Lončarić Rabadžija, Anto Majić, Dubravko Martinović, Ivan Medved, Zoran Milas, Marija Pudar Stručni odbor Ivica Anić, Ivan Bagarić, Željko Baklaić, Željko Bumber, Željko Bušić, Zlatko Čulig, Slobodan Dešković, Davorin Đanić, Ante Zvonimir Golem, Ljubomir Hotujac, Vladimir Jerković, Vlado Jukić, Josip Husar, Ivica Kostović, Dragutin Košuta, Mladen Krathovil, Zoran Lolić, Mate Ljubičić, Jadranka Mustajbegović, Josip Paladino, Nadan Petri, Ante Petričević, Dinko Puntarić, Branko Sruk, Davor Strinović, Mirna Šitum, Vlado Taborsky, Herman Vukušić, Boris Zdilar, Marijan Zlatar Poštovani, Pred vama je Zbornik sažetaka drugog hrvatskog kongresa vojne medicine s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem. Namjera kongresa nije bila samo još jednom
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Re-Filing of Redacted Appeal Brief of Berislav Pušić ______
    IT-04-74-A 17631 A17631 - A17540 28 July 2015 MB THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-A IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Carmel Agius Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date filed: 28 July 2015 THE PROSECUTOR v. JADRANKO PRLIĆ BRUNO STOJIĆ SLOBODAN PRALJAK MILIVOJ PETKOVIĆ VALENTIN ĆORIĆ and BERISLAV PUŠIĆ PUBLIC NOTICE OF RE-FILING OF REDACTED APPEAL BRIEF OF BERISLAV PUŠIĆ _____________________________________________________________________ Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Douglas Stringer Mr. Mathias Marcussen Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Michael G. Karnavas and Ms. SuzanaTomanović for Jadranko Prlić Ms. Senka Nožica and Mr. Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stojić Ms. Nika Pinter and Ms. Nataša Fauveau-Ivanović for Slobodan Praljak Ms. Vesna Alaburić and Mr. Davor Lazić for Milivoj Petković Ms. Dijana Tomašegović-Tomić and Mr. Dražen Plavec for Valentin Ćorić Mr. Fahrudin Ibrišimović and Mr. Jairaj Roger Sahota for Berislav Pušić IT-04-74-A 17630 1. The Defence for Berislav Pušić after consultations with the Prosecution files this notice pursuant to the Appeals Chamber’s Decision on the Prosecution’s Urgent Motion to Reclassify Public Briefs and Modify the Public Redacted Briefing Schedule dated 8 July 2015. Word count: 203 Respectfully submitted on 28 July 2015 Counsel for Berislav Pušić Mr Fahrudin Ibrišimović Case No. IT-04-74-A 1 28 July 2015 IT-04-74-A 17629 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-A IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Carmel Agius Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Registrar: Mr.
    [Show full text]