DOCSLIB.ORG

Bosnia and Herzegovina (2015-2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bosnia and Herzegovina (2015-2020) STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN FOR PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (2015-2020) 2016 2 IMPRESSUM Operational Focal Point for Global Environment Facility: Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina National Focal Point for the Convention on Biological Diversity: Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism Prepared under support of: United Nations Environment Program External Associates: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Center for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translators and Editors: Branka Ramadanović Zinaida Lakić Graphic Design: Vanesa Prodanović Authors of Photographs: Elma Okić 3 GENERAL INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for Revision of the National Biological Diversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs) and development of the Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Implementation Agency of United Nations Environment Program the Global Environment Facility Operational Focal Point for Senad Oprašić Ph.D., Head of Department for Environmental the Global Environment Protection, Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Facility Bosnia and Herzegovina National Focal Point for the Mehmed Cero Ph.D., Assistant Minister at the Sector for Convention on Biological Environment, Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism Diversity 4 (In alphabetical order) Members of the Steering Committee Mehmed Cero, Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism Svjetlana Radusin, Ministry for Physical Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of the Republika Srpska Vanda Medić, Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina Participants included in the monitoring and development of the Strategy and Action Plan for Protection of Biological Diversity in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2015-2020) Adi Habul, Environmental Fund of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Alma Kovačević, Center for Ecology and Energy Ana Soldo, Public Enterprise Vjetrenica – Popovo Field Arzija Pašalić, Faculty of Health Studies - University of Sarajevo Boris Marković, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Waters of the Republika Srpska Dalibor Ballian, Faculty of Forestry - University of Sarajevo Damir Behlulović, Federal Institute for Agropedology Dejan Kulijer, National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina Dejan Radošević, Republic Institute for Protection of Cultural, Historical and Natural Heritage of the Republika Srpska Dragan Anđelić, Public Institution „Vode Srpske“ Dragan Kovačević, Republic Institute for Protection of Cultural, Historical and Natural Heritage of the Republika Srpska Dražen Kotrošan, Ornithological Association „Naše ptice“ and National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina Fehrija Mehić, Federal Institute for Statistics Gordana Đurić, Genetic Resources Institute - University of Banja Luka Hamid Čustović, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences - University of Sarajevo Larisa Majić, Environmental Fund of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Lejla Šuman, Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe Marinko Antunović, Agency for the Water Basin of the Adriatic Sea Mihajlo Marković, Faculty of Agriculture - University of Banja Luka Mirjana Miličević, Faculty of Science and Education - University of Mostar Mirza Agić, Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina Naris Pojskić, Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Nermina Skejović-Hurić, Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina Nezafeta Sejdić, Agency for the Water Basin of the Sava River Nihada Ahmetović, Food Safety Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina Osman Delić, Public Institution for Protected Natural Areas of the Sarajevo Canton Siniša Čerketa, Institute of Statistics of the Republika Srpska 5 Stanko Stančić, Government of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina Vildana Tahirović, Veterinary Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina Vlasta Meić, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry Zineta Mujaković, Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism Zoran Lukač, Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund of the Republika Srpska Željka Stojičić, Ministry for Physical Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of the Republika Srpska 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We hereby express our gratitude to all of the below listed institutions, which have offered support in development of the Strategy and Action Plan for Protection of Biological Diversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2015-2020) by taking part in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Center in Bosnia and Herzegovina Administration of Bosnia and Herzegovina for Plant Health Protection Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for the Water Basin of the Adriatic Sea Agency for the Water Basin of the Sava River Bosnian-Herzegovinian Herpetology Association – ATRA Center for Ecology and Energy Center for Environmentally Sustainable Development – COOR Environmental Fund of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund of the Republika Srpska Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences - University of Sarajevo Faculty of Agriculture - University of Banja Luka Faculty of Forestry - University of Banja Luka Faculty of Forestry - University of Sarajevo Faculty of Science and Education - University of Mostar Faculty of Sciences - University of Banja Luka Faculty of Sciences - University of Sarajevo Faculty of Sciences - University of Tuzla Federal Institute for Statistics Federal Hydro meteorological Institute Federal Institute for Agropedology Federal Institute for Geology Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism Food Safety Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina Genetic Resources Institute of the Republika Srpska Government of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina Inspectorate of the Republika Srpska Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Institute for Planning and Development of the Sarajevo Canton Institute of Statistics of the Republika Srpska Ministry for Economic Relations and Regional Cooperation of the Republika Srpska Ministry for Physical Planning, Civil Engineering and Ecology of the Republika Srpska Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Waters of the Republika Srpska Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina Ornithological Association „Naše ptice“ 7 Public Institution for Protected Natural Areas of the Sarajevo Canton Republic Institute for Protection of Cultural, Historical and Natural Heritage of the Republika Srpska Society for Research and Protection of Biological Diversity – DIZB United Nations Development Program in Bosnia and Herzegovina Veterinary Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina We also extend our gratitude to other institutions and individuals that are not listed, but have given their contributions to the final shape of this document. 8 FOREWORD Bosnia and Herzegovina is characterized by a uniquely wide range of biological and landscape diversity resulting from the specific geomorphic structure, in terms of permeation among the climate regions of continental, Alpine and Mediterranean climates and the geographical position in the area of the northern plains along the Sava River, across the massif of the Dinaric Arc, down to the Adriatic Sea in the south. With responsible and sustainable management, its biological and physical-geographical diversity in their interaction provide Bosnia and Herzegovina with a good basis for human life and prosperity. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is the first international treaty that in an integrated way strives to solve the problems related to the protection and sustainable use of biological diversity of ranging from global, through regional, to national and local levels. As a basic international principle in nature protection, biological diversity conservation constitutes the most important strategic task in the protection and sustainable use of natural resources, and collective and individual care and responsibility of all countries. In accordance with the basic goals of the CBD, the 10th meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP), held in 2010 in Nagoya, Decision X/2 adopted the Strategic Plan for Biological Diversity 2011-2020, including 20 Aichi Targets developed in five key strategic goals. Accordingly, all parties to the CBD are invited to establish their own national targets within a given flexible framework, taking into account their national specificities, needs and priorities, and having in mind the achievement of global goals. Bosnia and Herzegovina, as a fully-fledged party to the CBD since 2002, has been following global trends of conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, and to this end it has mobilized its available institutions and experts to meet its international commitments, in particular to ensure that protection and sustainable use of biological diversity be an unavoidable area in the preparation of relevant sectoral policies and strategies at all levels of government in the state. Bosnia and Herzegovina has completed its first Strategy and Action Plan for Protection of Biological Diversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the period 2008-2015. Development of the Strategy and Action Plan for Protection of Biological Diversity of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the period 2015- 2020 is a continuation of global strategic planning and reporting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History and Development of the Communication Regulatory
    HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AGENCY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1998 – 2005 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Adin Sadic March 2006 2 This thesis entitled HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AGENCY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1998 – 2005 by ADIN SADIC has been approved for the School of Telecommunications and the College of Communication by __________________________________________ Gregory Newton Associate Professor of Telecommunications __________________________________________ Gregory Shepherd Interim Dean, College of Communication 3 SADIC, ADIN. M.A. March 2006. Communication Studies History and Development of the Communication Regulatory Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1998 – 2005 (247 pp.) Director of Thesis: Gregory Newton During the war against Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) over 250,000 people were killed, and countless others were injured and lost loved ones. Almost half of the B&H population was forced from their homes. The ethnic map of the country was changed drastically and overall damage was estimated at US $100 billion. Experts agree that misuse of the media was largely responsible for the events that triggered the war and kept it going despite all attempts at peace. This study examines and follows the efforts of the international community to regulate the broadcast media environment in postwar B&H. One of the greatest challenges for the international community in B&H was the elimination of hate language in the media. There was constant resistance from the local ethnocentric political parties in the establishment of the independent media regulatory body and implementation of new standards.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism”
    The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism” Davor Marijan War Museum, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia Abstract The author in this study does not intend to provide a comprehensive account of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in part because the cur- rent level of research does not enable this. The only way to understand this conflict is through facts, not prejudices. However, such prejudices are particularly acute amongst Muslim-Bosniac authors. They base their claims on the notion that Serbs and Croats are the destroyers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that both are equally culpable in its destruction. Relying on mainly unpublished and uncited documents from the three constitutive nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the author factually chal- lenges basic and generally accepted claims. The author offers alternative responses to certain claims and draws attention to the complexity of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has been mainly viewed in terms of black or white. The author does, however, suggest that in considering the character of the war it is necessary to examine first the war in Croatia and the inter-relationship between the two. The main focus is on 1992 and the Muslim and Croat differences that developed into open conflict at the beginning of 1993. The role of the international community in the war and the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are also discussed. At the end of the 20th century in Europe and the eclipse of Communism from the world political scene, it is not easy to trace the indelible marks left behind after the collapse of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution's Submission Pursuant to Rule 65
    IT-95-5/18-PT 18182 D 18182 - D 15860 18 May 2009 PvK UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 18 May 2009 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Iain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Christoph Flügge Judge Michèle Picard Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused: Radovan Karad`i} 18181 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s order of 6 April 20091 and Rule 65 ter (E)(i)- (iii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules), the Prosecution hereby files: (i) the final version of the Prosecutor's pre-trial brief (Appendix I); (ii) the confidential list of witnesses the Prosecutor intends to call (Appendix II); and (iii) the confidential list of exhibits the Prosecutor intends to offer into evidence (Appendix III). 2. Attached to Appendix I, the final pre-trial brief, are the following: - Confidential Attachment Detailing Events in the Municipalities: these set out the political background and events in the 27 municipalities;2 - Confidential Appendix A: Schedules A-G setting out additional particulars and the supporting evidence for the scheduled incidents; 1 Order Following on Status Conference and Appended Work Plan, 6 April 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Page 1 of 7
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Page 1 of 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina International Religious Freedom Report 2008 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and the entity Constitutions of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Federation) and the Republika Srpska (RS) provide for freedom of religion; the Law on Religious Freedom also provides comprehensive rights to religious communities. These and other laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The Government generally respected religious freedom in practice. Government protection of religious freedom improved slightly during the period covered by this report; however, local authorities continued at times to restrict religious freedom of minority religious groups. Societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice persisted. Discrimination against religious minorities occurred in nearly all parts of the country. The number of incidents targeting religious symbols, clerics, and property in the three ethnic majority areas decreased. Local religious leaders and politicians contributed to intolerance and an increase in nationalism through public statements. Religious symbols were often misused for political purposes. A number of illegally constructed religious objects continued to cause tension and conflict in various communities. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government and leaders from the four traditional religious communities and emerging religious groups as part of its overall policy to promote human rights and reconciliation. The U.S. Embassy supported religious communities in their efforts to acquire permits to build new religious structures. The Embassy also assisted religious communities regarding restitution of property and supported several exchange, speaking, and cultural programs promoting religious freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    30 June 2020 ISSN: 2560-1628 2020 No. 26 WORKING PAPER Belt and Road Initiative and Platform “17+1”: Perception and Treatment in the Media in Bosnia and Herzegovina Igor Soldo Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Wu Baiyi 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 [email protected] china-cee.eu Belt and Road Initiative and Platform “17+1”: Perception and Treatment in the Media in Bosnia and Herzegovina Igor Soldo Head of the Board of Directors, Foundation for the Promotion and Development of the Belt and Road Initiative, BiH Abstract The Belt and Road Initiative, as well as cooperation China - Central and Eastern European Countries (hereinafter: CEE) through the Platform "17+1" require the creation of a higher level of awareness of citizens about all aspects of the advantages of these foreign policy initiatives aimed at mutual benefit for both China and the participating countries. Of course, the media always play a key role in providing quality information to the general public, with the aim of better understanding all the benefits that these Chinese initiatives can bring to Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, the media can have a great influence on decision makers by creating a positive environment and by accurate and objective information. Therefore, when it comes to media articles related to these topics, it is important to look at the situation objectively and professionally. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the media treatment of the Belt and Road Initiative and Platform "17+1" in Bosnia and Herzegovina, quantitative measuring of the total number of media releases dealing with these topics in the media with editorial board or visible editorial policy, and their qualitative analysis, as well as the analysis of additional, special relevant articles.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • The EMERALD Network a Network of Areas of Special Conservation Interest for Europe
    The EMERALD Network a network of Areas of Special Conservation Interest for Europe CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS http://www.ecnc.nl/doc/lynx/publications/emerald.html 16th meeting Strasbourg, 2-6 December 1996 This short document explains how the EMERALD network was born, its reach and development, its relation with NATURA 2000 and other projects. 1. Introduction In June 1989 the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention held an extraordinary meeting exclusively devoted to habitat conservation within the Convention. At the meeting the Committee adopted an interpretative resolution (Resolution No. 1 (1989) on the provisions relating to the conservation of habitats) and three operative recommendations (Recommendations Nos. 14, 15 and 16 (1989)) aimed at the development of a network of areas under the Convention. A further recommendation (Recommendation No. 25 (1991) on the conservation of natural areas outside protected areas proper) was adopted at a later meeting of the Committee. In Recommendation No. 16 (1989) "on Areas of Special Conservation Interest" (ASCIs), the Standing Committee recommended Parties to "take steps to designate Areas of Special Conservation Interest to ensure that the necessary and appropriate conservation measures are taken for each area situated within their territory or under their responsibility where that area fits one or several of the following conditions..." (a list of conditions followed). The Committee had wished that all these recommendations on habitat conservation be rapidly implemented by Contracting Parties but two major events delayed their implementation. The first was the fundamental change in the political map of Europe that followed the fall of the Berlin wall in October 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. T-6807-BIH TECHNICAL ANNEX Public Disclosure Authorized BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EMERGENCYTRANSPORT RECONSTRUCTIONPROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized MARCH 13, 1996 Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Unit of Currency: Bosnia and Herzegovina Dinar (BHD) BHD100.00 = US$0.67 (as of March 8, 1996) US$1.00 = BHD 149.25 (as of March 8, 1996) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic BH - Bosnia and Herzegovina BHMTC - BH Ministry of Foreign Trade and International Communications EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC - European Commission ECA - Europe and Central Asia Regional Office EU - European Union FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FBH - Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FRD - Federal Road Directorate FMTC - Federal Ministry of Transport and Communications FYP - First year Program GDP - Gross Domestic Product ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization IDA - International Development Association IFOR - Implementation Force IMG - International Management Group IRI - International Roughness Index IRR - Internal Rate of Return NBF - Non Bank Financed PID - Project Implementation Directorate PMA - Program Management Advisor RAS - Road Advisory Services RD - Road Directorate RS - Republica Srpska SUS - Start Up Services TFBH - Trust Fund for Bosnia and Herzegovina UN - United Nations UNPROFOR - United Nations Protection Force USAID - United States Agency for International Development VOC - Vehicle Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA “Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, 1/94, 13/97 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - consolidated translation, with amendments indicated - • The Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was adopted by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24, 1994. It was published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendment I to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24th,1994. It was also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendments II to XXIV to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at its 14th session held on June 5th,1996. They were published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. • Amendments XXV and XXVI to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed according to the procedure in Chapter VIII, finalized on May 8th, 1997. They were also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. PREAMBLE I. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FEDERATION Arts. 1-6 II. HUMAN RIGHTS A. General Arts. 1-7 B. Initial Appointment and Functions of the Ombudsmen Arts. 1-9 III. DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN THE FEDERATION GOVERNMENT AND THE CANTONS Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulatory Framework for Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises in European Waters
    The Regulatory Framework for Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises in European Waters Andrea Ripol, Seas At Risk, Brussels, Belgium and Mirta Zupan, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences and Ghent University, Belgium No EU citizen wants to eat fish that has been caught at the expense of iconic species like dolphins or whales. The legal framework to prevent the killing of marine mammals exists, now it is just a matter of political will to implement it. Andrea Ripol © Tilen Genov, Morigenos © Tilen Genov, 28 Overview of Cetacean Species in European Waters (including Red List Status) Introduction Interest in whale conservation began in earnest in the late 1940s largely as a response to the unsustainable pressure placed on whale populations by intensified commercial whaling. At first, the aim was to conserve populations in order to continue harvesting them. In the 1970s, as environmental activism heightened, several international agreements for nature protection were signed, including the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Today, in addition, cetaceans in European Union (EU) waters are strictly protected by the EU‘s Habitats Directive, as well as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which intends to prevent human-induced decline of biodiversity, targets various pressures and threats and tries to achieve a good environmental status in EU waters. Legal framework in Europe Habitats Directive and the Natura 2000 network The protection of cetaceans in the EU is primarily driven by the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC), a cornerstone of EU legislation for nature protection, adopted in 1992 (Council of the European Communities, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Impact Study
    Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Final revised versions that incorporates inputs from consultations with the public and relevant authorities Zagreb, May 2015 IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Strategic Environmental Impact Study Document quality information Authors of SEA Jiří Dusík, Dipl. Engineer - Water Resource Engineering Study Marta Brkić, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Ivan Juratek, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Vjeran Magjarević, B. Sc. Phys. Tomislav Hriberšek, B.Sc. Geology Ines Geci, B.Sc. Geology Mario Pokrivač, B.Sc. Traffic, Occupational Safety Specialist Authors of Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Appropriate Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology Assessment M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Tajana Uzelac Obradović, B.Sc. Biology Project name Ex-ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment for Interreg IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Document name Strategic Environmental Impact Study Version and Final draft incorporating comments after public consultations (20 May dates 2015) Reference U070_14 Managing Directorate for Managing Cooperation Programmes and Regional authority Development within the Agency for Regional Development Sent to Service for Managing Cooperation Programmes Sent on (date): 20 May 2015 Contact
    [Show full text]