Mexican Real Estate
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Initial Determinants of Mexican Mass Migration
Initial Determinants of Mexican Mass Migration David Escamilla-Guerrero [email protected] London School of Economics November 8, 2018 Abstract The paper addresses the determinants of the Mexican-US migration flow in its begin- nings (1884-1910). Exploiting an original data set based on individual border crossings from 1906 to 1908, I present for the first time, the spatial distribution of the flow at the local level. The micro data reveal that Mexican and American historiography misrepresented the composition of the flow regarding the immigrant’s locations of birth and last residence. Contrary to previous literature, most immigrants came from the border states rather than from the central plateau of Mexico. In addition, internal migration was not the main mechanism to cross the border since 60 percent of the flow was characterized by direct emigration to the United States. The quantitative assessment reveals that market potentials and Mexican immigrant networks in the US were the main pull factors rather than the US-Mexico wage gap. On the other hand, differences in living standards across Mexico were the main push factor. Despite their importance for the Mexican economy, railways had a limited effect on the migration flow during the Age of Mass Migration. Keywords: labor migration, railways, institutions, Mexico JEL Classification Numbers: N36, N76, F22, J61 Acknowledgments: I am especially grateful to my PhD supervisors Eric Schneider and Joan Rosés for their guidance and invaluable comments. I thank Chris Minns, Zachary Ward, Neil Cummins, Alfonso Cabreros-Zurita, León Fernández-Bujanda and Mattia Bertazzini for their extensive feedback; and Daniela Gutiérrez and Marco Villeda for their assistance on the data transcription. -
White Paper Mexican Residential Real Estate
White Paper Mexican Residential Real Estate Toronto, Canada April, 2017 1 Table of Contents Investment Thesis Why Invest Capital in Mexican Residential Real Estate? o Strong Demographics will Drive Growth o Growing Middle Class = Favorable Demand Dynamics o Supply Shortfall (The Opportunity) o Government Support o Evolving Mortgage System Residential Market Overview o Product Segmentation o Housing Market Results 2015 o Housing Market Projections o Final Thoughts Barnhart Asset Management Corporate Overview 2 Mexican Residential Real Estate Investment Thesis Due to a young population in their early household formation years, low unemployment, strong economic growth and a government supported mortgage market, sustainable demand for housing in Mexico is anticipated for years to come. From a supply perspective, a fragmented home builder industry, a non competitive lending community and a non existent apartment rental sector has created a persisting housing deficit year over year. As a result of the supply and demand imbalance, BAM sees an opportunity to make significant risk adjusted returns by partnering with small and mid- sized local developers to provide new housing alternatives for the emerging middle class of Mexico. 3 Strong Demographics Will Drive Growth 4 Wealth Creation and Emerging Middle Class • Mexico has the 6th largest GDP per capita in the Americas with significant room for growth in the years to come. $60,000 GDP per Capita PPP $USD $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $- Argentina Brazil Canada Colombia Mexico United States Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook Database, April 2016. 5 Wealth Creation and Emerging Middle Class • Between 1992 and 2010, 42 million people became part of the Mexican middle class (annual income US$18-$50,000). -
Mexico Market Update
Singapore: Hotel Market Market Report - March 2019 MARKET REPORT Mexico Market Update AUGUST 2020 Mexico - Market Update Market Report - August 2020 Mexican Tourist Outlook 2020 The following analysis will examine the current state of the With more than 11,100 km of coastline and landscape Mexican economy, the tourism sector, and the evolution that varies from desert to mountains and rainforests, as of variables that have a tangible influence on the hotel well as an abundant cultural heritage that includes well- industry in Mexico. preserved ancient indigenous cities, Mexico has a privileged geographical location that appeals to its North American Size of the Mexican Hotel Industry neighbors. There should be no doubt about the economic importance of tourism for Mexico. In 2019, 44.7 million foreign tourists Number of Rooms visited Mexico and the total income for this concept Country Number of Rooms amounted to 24.6 billion dollars. In that same year, Mexico 808,139 Mexico was ranked number 7 worldwide for the number of Brazil 541,314 international tourists (OMT). The sector directly accounts Colombia 307,458 for an 8.7% share of the Mexican GDP and provides Perú 304,640 employment for 2.3 million people (2018). Tourism provides 6% of the total amount of work in the economy and is in Argentina 118,858 first place as a youth-employer sector, as well as in second Ecuador 74,173 place for women-employer sector. Costa Rica 57,233 Chile 45,112 Tourism’s share in national GDP 2011-2018 Source: DATATUR, MINCETUR, REPORTUR, SERNATUR, EMBRATUR 8.75% 8.70% 8.70% Mexico occupies the largest share in number of rooms, 8.65% 8.60% 8.60% 8.60% when compared to Central and South American countries. -
06/03/2015 I. Eventos Relevantes De Las Principales Emisoras
Fecha de Elaboración: 06/03/2015 I. Eventos Relevantes De Las Principales Emisoras (S.A.B’s) RAZÓN SOCIAL EVENTOS RELEVANTES (clave de pizarra) ARCA CONTINENTAL, S.A.B DE Sin publicación C.V (AC) ALFA, S.A.B DE C.V Sin publicación (ALFA) ALPEK, S.A.B de C.V Sin publicación (ALPEK) ALSEA, S.A.B DE C.V (ALSEA) b)De acue Ley del Mercado de Valores) con el 6 siguiente, por este mismo medio y conforme lo estable el marco normativo. General aplicables a las emisoras de valores y a otros participantes del mercado de valores. AMERICA MOVIL, S.A.B DE C.V Sin publicación (AMX) GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL SURESTE, S.A.B DE C.V (ASUR) GRUPO BIMBO, S.A.B DE C.V Sin publicación (BIMBO) BOLSA MEXICANA DE Sin publicación VALORES, S.A.B DE C.V (BOLSA) CEMEX, S.A.B DE CV MONTERREY, MEXICO. 2 de Marzo de - (CEMEX) convocada para celebrarse el 26 de marzo de 2015. GRUPO CARSO, S.A.B DE C.V 2 (GCARSO) Sin publicación CONTROLADORA COMERCIAL MEXICANA, S.A.B DE C.V Cont (COMERCI) CCM se mantienen sin camb Adicionalmente, en es En 2015 se proyecta la apertura de cinco nuevas tiendas, de las cuales una corresp con Centros comerciales y mantenimiento operativo 1 $ 685 CEDIS Vallejo 1 $ 50 y Fresko. lo que 3 crezcan un 2.0% a unidades iguales y 1.8% a tiendas totales - esto debido el efecto de la venta de Restaurantes California. control de gastos administrativos y de operaciones. -
Comunicado Prensa Indicador
. – – – – . Evaluación Calificación Estatus Final De 80% a 100% Calidad Buena De 51% a 79% Calidad Regular Menor o igual a 50% Calidad Deficiente Instrumento No. de emisoras Verde Amarillo Rojo Acciones 136 121 4 11 Deuda largo plazo 64 56 7 1 FIBRAs* 11 11 - - CKDs 54 49 5 - Total 265 237 16 12 * Incluye un fideicomiso hipotecario. Clave de Razón Social de la emisora (ACCIONES) Calificación Pizarra Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V. ALFA 100 Alpek, S.A.B. de C.V. ALPEK 100 América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. AMX 100 Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V. AC 100 Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V. AXTEL 100 Bio Pappel, S.A.B. de CV PAPPEL 100 Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. BOLSA 100 Cemex, S.A.B. de C.V. CEMEX 100 CMR, S.A.B. de C.V. CMR 100 Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. KOF 100 Compañía Minera Autlan, S.A.B. de C.V. AUTLAN 100 Consorcio Ara, S.A.B. de C.V. ARA 100 Consorcio Hogar, S.A.B. de C.V. HOGAR 100 Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. VOLAR 100 Convertidora Industrial, S.A.B. de C.V. CONVER 100 Corporación Actinver, S.A.B. de C.V. ACTINVR 100 Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VESTA 100 Corporación Moctezuma, S.A.B. de C.V. CMOCTEZ 100 Corporativo Fragua, S.A.B. de C.V. FRAGUA 100 Corporativo GBM, S.A.B. -
Fitch Rati Ca Cali Cación De Gruma En 'AAA(Mex)'; Perspectiva Estable
8/31/2020 Fitch Ratifica Calificación de Gruma en 'AAA(mex)'; Perspectiva Estable RATING ACTION COMMENTARY Fitch Ratica Calicación de Gruma en 'AAA(mex)'; Perspectiva Estable Mon 31 Aug, 2020 - 7:26 PM ET Fitch Ratings - Monterrey - 31 Aug 2020: Fitch Ratings raticó la calicación en escala nacional de Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. (Gruma) en 'AAA(mex)' y la calicación de corto plazo en escala nacional en ‘F1+(mex)’. Asimismo, raticó las calicaciones en escala internacional en moneda extranjera y local de Gruma en 'BBB'. La Perspectiva de las calicaciones es Estable. La raticación de las calicaciones reeja la posición de negocio sólida de Gruma como uno de los productores principales de harina de maíz y tortillas en el mundo, con marcas reconocidas en sus mercados principales y diversicación geográca de sus operaciones. Las calicaciones también incorporan su perl nanciero consistente con márgenes de rentabilidad buenos, niveles bajos de apalancamiento y posición amplia de liquidez. Fitch prevé que Gruma manejará efectivamente en 2020 los desafíos asociados un entorno económico débil y a las disrupciones de la pandemia por coronavirus. Se espera que el aumento en la demanda de sus productos en el canal de supermercado compense la disminución en la demanda en el segmento de servicios de comida. Fitch proyecta que la deuda total a EBITDA (excluye IFRS 16) de Gruma estará entre 1.5 veces (x) y 2.0x en los próximos 12 a 24 meses. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/es/corporate-finance/fitch-ratifica-calificacion-de-gruma-en-aaa-mex-perspectiva-estable-31-08-2020 1/12 8/31/2020 Fitch Ratifica Calificación de Gruma en 'AAA(mex)'; Perspectiva Estable FACTORES CLAVE DE CALIFICACIÓN Disrupciones por Coronavirus Manejable: Las operaciones de Gruma han mostrado resiliencia durante la pandemia por coronavirus ya que los consumidores han cambiado sus preferencias a consumir en casa en comparación a consumir fuera de casa. -
Nota Informativa (AEAL 09Abr19
SUMMARY RELATED TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AS PART OF THE SERIES “L” SPECIAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING OF AMÉRICA MÓVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V., TO BE HELD ON APRIL 09, 2019 IN MEXICO CITY AT 10:00 A.M. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ By means of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of AMÉRICA MÓVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V. (the “Company” or “AMX”), in its meeting held on February 12, 2019, the Company called its Series “L” shareholders to a Special Shareholders’ Meeting (the “Meeting”), to be held on April 09, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Mexico City Time), in the Company’s Auditorium located at Lago Zurich 245, Plaza Carso, Edificio Telcel, 15th Floor, Colonia Ampliación Granada, Miguel Hidalgo, 11529, Mexico City, in order to address the following items: I. Appointment or, as the case may be, reelection of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company that the holders of the Series “L” shares are entitled to appoint. Adoption of resolutions thereon. II. Appointment of delegates to execute, and if, applicable, formalize the resolutions adopted by the Meeting. Adoption of resolutions thereon. Information related to the items of the Agenda Appointment or reelection of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company that the holders of the Series “L” shares are entitled to appoint Item I. Submission of a proposal for the approval by the Meeting of the reelection of the Company’s current board members that the holders of the Series “L” shares are entitled to appoint. If the aforesaid proposal is approved, the following persons would be reelected as board members: Pablo Roberto González Guajardo Principal occupation: CEO of Kimberly Clark de México, S.A.B. -
Corporate Bond Market Review May 6, 2020
Estrategia de Deuda Corporativa México cccc7 Corporate Bond Market Review May 6, 2020 Early material implications of the pandemic www.banorte.com @analisis_fundam ▪ During April 2020 only one bond was placed, unsecured note ACTINVR 20 for MXN 500 million (‘AA-’, TIIE 28 + 0.9%), the monthly issued Tania Abdul Massih amount was 94.9% lower than the recorded for the same period of 2019 Director of Corporate Debt [email protected] ▪ The first material implications of the pandemic took place during April, highlighting the sovereign downgrades by Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Hugo Gómez Senior Analyst, Corporate Debt Investor Service, as well as several rating corporate actions [email protected] ▪ In the short-term market, outstanding amount totaled MXN 34,316 Gerardo Valle million, a 15.2% y/y reduction due to the COVID-19 sanitary crisis and Analyst, Corporate Debt its economic consequences [email protected] ▪ In May 2020 we expect maturities for MXN 8,355 million from FEFA, Liverpool, Toyota and Cetelem. Based on the actual market conditions, with a high-risk aversion from investors, these maturities could be covered with revolving credit facilities Long-term corporate bond market. During April 2020 the corporate bond market observed the first material implications of the coronavirus epidemic in Contents Mexico. The relevant events that stand out are the sovereign downgrades; Fitch Long-Term Corporate Bond Market 2 Short-Term Corporate Bond Market 9 cut to ‘BBB-’ from ‘BBB’, while Moody’s downgraded the rating to ‘Baa1’ from Banking Bond Market (VT 94 and CD) 13 ‘A3’, following S&P Global ratings last month. -
Cross-Border Investments Lay the Foundation for Shared Regional Prosperity
Growing Together: Economic Ties between the United States and Mexico Cross-Border Investments Lay the Foundation for Shared Regional Prosperity By Christopher Wilson #USMXEcon October 2016 Growing Together: Economic Ties between the United States and Mexico Cross-Border Investments Lay the Foundation for Shared Regional Prosperity By Christopher Wilson Project Introduction The impact of trade and globalization on the average American has become a core issue in this year’s elections. We have heard measured, well-founded and serious critiques on the handling of issues like currency manipulation and preparing our workforce for participation in the global economy, but the conversation has also drawn many passionate and visceral responses, highlighting the intensity with which citizens feel the impact of economic change. Due to campaign rhetoric, Mexico has come to symbolize much of the U.S. encounter with globalization. Given that Mexico is the United States’ second largest export market, third largest overall trading partner, and the top country of origin for immigrants living in the country, this is understandable. Nonetheless, having become a top tier issue in the presidential elections, it is more important than ever that Americans have a clear and up-to-date understanding of Mexico and, in particular, the U.S.-Mexico economic relationship. With that in mind, the Mexico Institute is pleased to announce the launch of a new project, Growing Together: Economic Ties between the United States and Mexico, which explores the bilateral economic relationship in detail to understand its nature and its impact on the United States. We have commissioned original research on the employment impact of bilateral trade on the U.S. -
Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio-Institutional Class As of July 31, 2021 (Updated Monthly) Source: State Street Holdings Are Subject to Change
Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio-Institutional Class As of July 31, 2021 (Updated Monthly) Source: State Street Holdings are subject to change. The information below represents the portfolio's holdings (excluding cash and cash equivalents) as of the date indicated, and may not be representative of the current or future investments of the portfolio. The information below should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any security. This listing of portfolio holdings is for informational purposes only and should not be deemed a recommendation to buy the securities. The holdings information below does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. The holdings information has not been audited. By viewing this listing of portfolio holdings, you are agreeing to not redistribute the information and to not misuse this information to the detriment of portfolio shareholders. Misuse of this information includes, but is not limited to, (i) purchasing or selling any securities listed in the portfolio holdings solely in reliance upon this information; (ii) trading against any of the portfolios or (iii) knowingly engaging in any trading practices that are damaging to Dimensional or one of the portfolios. Investors should consider the portfolio's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses, which are contained in the Prospectus. Investors should read it carefully before investing. Your use of this website signifies that you agree to follow and be bound by the terms -
Mexican Multinational Enterprises: Navigating Uncertainty from NAFTA to the USMCA March 2020
1 Mexican Multinational Enterprises: Navigating Uncertainty from NAFTA to the USMCA March 2020 Mexico City and New York, The Institute for Economic Research (IIEc) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their ninth survey of Mexican multinationals.1 The survey, conducted in 2019, is part of a long-term study of the rapid global expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging markets. The present report focuses on data for the year 2017. Highlights In 2017, the 20 largest Mexican MNEs had foreign assets of US$ 153 billion (Table 1), foreign revenue of US$ 100 billion, and 408,231 foreign employees (Annex I, Table 1). The two largest companies (América Móvil and CEMEX) together controlled US$ 74 billion, equivalent to 48% of the total foreign assets of the companies on the list. The four largest MNEs (also including FEMSA and Grupo Mexico) together controlled US$ 104 billion, equivalent to 68% of the total. Companies in the food and beverage sectors (seven) dominate the list, followed by companies in the non-metallic minerals (three) and diversified (three) sectors. Only two companies are 1 The authors of this report, Dr. Jorge Basave Kunhardt and Dra. Maria Teresa Gutiérrez Haces are senior researchers at the Economics Research Institute of National University of Mexico (UNAM). The authors kindly ask that this work be cited properly. Technical support was provided by Vanessa Mora and Iris Velasco. -
Mexican Migration to the US Border Region
WHY STOP T HERE ? MEXICAN MIGRATION TO THE U.S. BORDER REGION PIA M. ORRENIUS , MADELINE ZAV O DNY AND LESLIE LUKENS RE S EARCH DEPART M ENT WORKING PAPER 0803 Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas ٭Why Stop There? Mexican Migration to the U.S. Border Region Pia M. Orrenius, Ph.D. Madeline Zavodny, Ph.D. Research Department Department of Economics Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and IZA Agnes Scott College and IZA 2200 N. Pearl St. 141 E. College Ave. Dallas, TX 75201 Decatur, GA 30030 (214) 922-5747 (404) 471-6377 [email protected] [email protected] Leslie Lukens LBJ School of Public Affairs University of Texas at Austin 2315 Red River St. Austin, TX 78712 (512) 469-7878 [email protected] March, 2008 Abstract The transformation of the U.S. border economy since the 1980s provides a fascinating backdrop to explore how migration to the U.S-side of the Mexican border has changed vis-à-vis migration to the U.S. interior. Some long-standing patterns of border migrants remained unchanged during this period while others underwent drastic changes. For example, border migrants are consistently more likely to be female, to have migrated within Mexico, and to lack migrant networks as compared with migrants to the U.S. interior. Meanwhile, the occupational profile of border migrants has changed drastically from being predominately agricultural work to being largely made up of service-sector and sales-related work. Border migration is more sensitive to Mexican and U.S. business cycles than migration to the U.S.