Gao-21-322, Firearms Trafficking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gao-21-322, Firearms Trafficking United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters February 2021 FIREARMS TRAFFICKING U.S. Efforts to Disrupt Gun Smuggling into Mexico Would Benefit from Additional Data and Analysis GAO-21-322 February 2021 FIREARMS TRAFFICKING U.S. Efforts to Disrupt Gun Smuggling into Mexico Would Benefit from Additional Data and Analysis Highlights of GAO-21-322, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. Southwest Border Trafficking of U.S.-sourced firearms into Mexico is a national security threat, as it Counternarcotics Strategy: 2020 facilitates the illegal drug trade and has been linked to organized crime. The identified the trafficking of firearms Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives from the U.S. into Mexico as a threat to (ATF) found that 70 percent of firearms reported to have been recovered in the safety and security of both Mexico from 2014 through 2018 and submitted for tracing were U.S. sourced. countries. The Mexican government However, ATF does not receive complete data about thousands of firearms, such has estimated that 200,000 firearms as those recovered by Mexican states, because only Mexico’s federal Attorney are smuggled from the United States General’s office submits trace requests to ATF. In addition, the Department of each year. Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) GAO was asked to report on U.S. has identified smuggling trends by analyzing DHS data on 1,012 firearms seized efforts to counter firearms trafficking to in the U.S. by DHS agencies. However, ICE has not analyzed ATF data on Mexico. This report examines (1) the 56,000 U.S. firearms recovered in Mexico. Additional data and analysis could extent of U.S. agencies’ knowledge enhance U.S. efforts to understand firearms sources and smuggling routes. about firearms trafficking to Mexico and (2) U.S. agencies’ efforts to disrupt Examples of Firearms Recovered in Mexico this trafficking and the extent to which they have assessed those efforts. GAO reviewed firearms tracing data, related analysis, and program information for fiscal years 2014 through 2020. GAO also interviewed U.S. and Mexican officials. This is a public version of a sensitive report that GAO issued in December U.S. agencies have undertaken a number of efforts to disrupt firearms trafficking 2020. to Mexico—including several recently established efforts as well as prior and ongoing ones—but are unable to assess progress toward this goal. What GAO Recommends • In April 2020, ATF established Operation Southbound to coordinate with GAO is making eight other agencies to disrupt firearms trafficking to Mexico. ATF also conducts recommendations, including investigations related to Mexico. recommending that ATF and ICE • In fiscal year 2020, ICE and DHS’s U.S. Customs and Border Protection analyze additional information about the trafficking of U.S.-sourced firearms (CBP) established a joint operation to intercept firearms being smuggled to to Mexico and that ATF, ICE, CBP, and Mexico. ICE and CBP also conduct other efforts related to this issue. For State develop performance measures example, in fiscal years 2015 through 2017, ICE-led taskforces seized 1,104 to assess the results of their efforts to firearms along the southwest border. In fiscal years 2014 through 2019, CBP disrupt this trafficking. The agencies seized an annual average of 115 firearms at the border, and in the first 10 concurred with GAO’s months of fiscal year 2020, CBP increased outbound inspection at some recommendations. ports of entry and seized 321 firearms. • The Department of State (State) helps lead a working group to coordinate these and other U.S. efforts with the government of Mexico. State also provided $54 million in fiscal years 2015 through 2019 to help build Mexico’s capacity to disrupt trafficking through, for example, forensics training, inspection equipment, and canines trained for weapons detection. However, none of the agencies have fully developed performance measures for View GAO-21-322. For more information, their efforts to disrupt firearms trafficking to Mexico, and thus they have limited contact Chelsa Kenney at (202) 512-2964 or ability to assess progress. Identifying performance measures—including goals, [email protected]. indicators, targets, and time frames—would enhance their ability to optimize the use of U.S. government resources to address this threat to U.S. national security. United States Government Accountability Office Contents Letter 1 Background 3 ATF Traced Most Firearms Reported Recovered in Mexico to the U.S., but ATF’s and ICE’s Knowledge of Sources and Trends Has Gaps 12 U.S. Agencies Have Recently Initiated Efforts to Disrupt Firearms Trafficking to Mexico but Lack Performance Measures to Assess Results 24 Conclusions 36 Recommendations for Executive Action 37 Agency Comments 38 Appendix I Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 40 Appendix II Logic Models 43 Appendix III Comments from the Department of Homeland Security 44 Appendix IV Comments from the Department of State 48 Appendix V GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 50 Tables Table 1: State Assistance Provided to Build Mexican Government Capacity to Combat Firearms Trafficking, Fiscal Years 2015–2019 31 Table 2: Extent to Which U.S. Agencies Have Developed Performance Measures for Recent Initiatives Focused on Disrupting U.S.-Sourced Firearms Trafficking to Mexico 34 Table 3: Summary of Logic Model Example from Department of State’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons 43 Page i GAO-21-322 Firearms Trafficking Figures Figure 1: ATF’s Process for Tracing a Firearm Recovered in Mexico to an Initial Purchaser 7 Figure 2: HSI BEST Locations on the U.S.–Mexican Border as of September 2020 8 Figure 3: Locations of Official U.S. Land Ports of Entry on the U.S.–Mexican Border 10 Figure 4: Origins of Firearms Recovered in Mexico and Traced by ATF, 2014–2018 13 Figure 5: Types of U.S.-Sourced Firearms Recovered in Mexico and Traced by ATF, 2014–2018 14 Figure 6: Example of a Firearm Recovered in Mexico and Held by a Mexican State Attorney General’s Office 16 Figure 7: Locations of Initial Purchasers of U.S.-Sourced Firearms Recovered in Mexico and Traced by ATF, 2014–2018 18 Figure 8: Obliterated Serial Number on a Firearm Recovered in Mexico 20 Figure 9: Border Enforcement Security Taskforce (BEST) Firearm and Ammunition Seizures along the U.S.–Mexican Border, Fiscal Years 2015–2017 28 Figure 10: Examples of State Assistance Provided to Build Mexican Government Capacity to Combat Firearms Trafficking 31 Figure 11: Mexican Laboratories with Ballistics Accreditation as of July 2020 32 Figure 12: Locations of Mexican Federal and State Participants in U.S.-Provided Firearms Identification Training as of July 2020 33 Page ii GAO-21-322 Firearms Trafficking Abbreviations ATF Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives BEST Border Enforcement Security Taskforce CBP U.S. Customs and Border Protection DHS Department of Homeland Security DOJ Department of Justice HSI Homeland Security Investigations ICE U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement INL Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs State Department of State TCIU transnational criminal investigative unit TCO transnational criminal organization This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. Page iii GAO-21-322 Firearms Trafficking Letter 441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 February 22, 2021 The Honorable Dick Durbin Chairman Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate The Honorable Gregory W. Meeks Chairman Committee on Foreign Affairs House of Representatives Violent crime perpetrated by transnational criminal organizations (TCO) continue to raise security concerns on both sides of the U.S.–Mexican border. A 2020 Congressional Research Service report estimated that more than 150,000 people had been killed in Mexico as a result of organized crime since 2006.1 U.S.-sourced firearms trafficked into Mexico—an estimated 200,000 each year, according to the Mexican government—are contributing to this violence by facilitating the illicit drug trade.2 The U.S. and Mexican governments have each acknowledged the threat posed by the trafficking of firearms from the United States to TCOs in Mexico.3 The Mexican government has emphasized that combating firearms trafficking is among its top priorities with respect to the United States, according to Mexican officials. In February 2020, the U.S. government’s Southwest Border Counternarcotics Strategy: 2020 identified the smuggling, trafficking, and illegal export of weapons from 1Congressional Research Service, Mexico: Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking Organizations (Washington, D.C.: July 28, 2020). In our report, all years cited are calendar years (January–December) unless denoted as fiscal years (October–September). 2According to officials of the U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and State, the Mexican government’s estimate of the number of firearms trafficked from the United States to Mexico annually is the best estimate available. 3“Firearms trafficking” refers to the diversion of guns from lawful commerce to the illegal market. Page 1 GAO-21-322 Firearms Trafficking the United States to Mexico as a threat to the safety and security of both countries.4 You asked us to report on U.S. efforts to counter firearms trafficking to Mexico.5 This report examines (1) the extent of U.S. agencies’ knowledge of firearms trafficking to Mexico and (2) U.S. agencies’ efforts to disrupt firearms trafficking to Mexico and the extent to which they have assessed those efforts.
Recommended publications
  • War on the Mexican Drug Cartels
    THE WAR ON MEXICAN CARTELS OPTIONS FOR U.S. AND MEXICAN POLICY-MAKERS POLICY PROGRAM CHAIRS Ken Liu Chris Taylor GROUP CHAIR Jean-Philippe Gauthier AUTHORS William Dean Laura Derouin Mikhaila Fogel Elsa Kania Tyler Keefe James McCune Valentina Perez Anthony Ramicone Robin Reyes Andrew Seo Minh Trinh Alex Velez-Green Colby Wilkason RESEARCH COORDINATORS Tia Ray Kathryn Walsh September 2012 Final Report of the Institute of Politics National Security Student Policy Group THE WAR ON MEXICAN CARTELS OPTIONS FOR U.S. AND MEXICAN POLICY-MAKERS POLICY PROGRAM CHAIRS Ken Liu Chris Taylor GROUP CHAIR Jean-Philippe Gauthier AUTHORS William Dean Laura Derouin Mikhaila Fogel Elsa Kania Tyler Keefe James McCune Valentina Perez Anthony Ramicone Robin Reyes Andrew Seo Minh Trinh Alex Velez-Green Colby Wilkason RESEARCH COORDINATORS Tia Ray Kathryn Walsh September 2012 Final Report of the Institute of Politics 2 National Security Student Policy Group Institute of Politics ABOUT THE INSTITUTE OF POLITICS NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY GROUP The Institute of Politics is a non-profit organization located in the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. It is a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy, and its mission is to unite and engage students, particularly undergraduates, with academics, politicians, activists, and policymakers on a non-partisan basis and to stimulate and nurture their interest in public service and leadership. The Institute strives to promote greater understanding and cooperation between the academic world and the world of politics and public affairs. Led by a Director, Senior Advisory Board, Student Advisory Committee, and staff, the Institute provides wide-ranging opportunities for both Harvard students and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • 2134 ISS Monograph 116 Sierra Leone.Indd
    ISS MONOGRAPH No 116 PERPETUATING POWER: SMALL ARMS IN POST-CONFLICT SIERRA LEONE AND LIBERIA It is estimated that between eight and ten million small arms are circulating in West Africa; the real number is probably higher. Civil war in the Mano River Basin, where resources such as diamonds, rubber, and timber create buying power for political factions of all persuasions, has sustained the international flow of weapons to the region. With United Nations missions in both Sierra Leone and Liberia and the accompanying disarmament and demobilisation in both places having come to an end, markets for small arms and light weapons in West Africa are still open for business. Disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration processes have created their own weapons markets across borders as prices for handing over a weapon vary from country to country. State-centred solutions to illicit arms proliferation do not work when the state in question cannot fund traditional security operations. Borders are porous, and though they should be closed or better monitored, that is not a short- or medium-term option. Instead, this monograph looks at the factors behind the demand for weapons in Sierra Leone and Liberia, focusing on the buyer side of the market to determine whether proliferation can be stemmed, or at least slowed down, through more creative measures. Price: R20-00 PPERPETRATINGERPETRATING PPOWEROWER SMALL ARMS IN POST-CONFLICT SIERRA LEONE AND LIBERIA TAYA WEISS The vision of the Institute for Security Studies is one of a stable and peaceful Africa characterised by human rights, the rule of law, democracy and collaborative security.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia:Liberia: Backback Toto Thethe Futurefuture What Is the Future of Liberia’S Forests and Its Effects on Regional Peace?
    Recommendations contained on page 1 Liberia:Liberia: BackBack toto thethe FutureFuture What is the future of Liberia’s forests and its effects on regional peace? A Report by Global Witness. May 2004 Liberia—Back to the Future Recommendations The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) should: The United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) should: G Maintain the embargo on the export and transport of Liberian timber, and its import into G Ensure that regular patrols are carried out in both other countries. The embargo should remain in interior and border areas to ensure the collection place until it can be demonstrated that the of comprehensive intelligence on trafficking Liberian timber trade does not contribute to activities and abuses against the civilian national and regional insecurity. population. G Utilise UNMIL to secure Liberia’s lucrative G Work closely with the International Criminal natural resources, assess and monitor any existing Court (ICC) to determine how, during the course and likely cross-border land and sea-based of carrying out its duties, UNMIL can smuggling routes, and coordinate the region’s UN mainstream data-collection to include information peacekeeping forces and national military forces to that may be of use for potential war crimes create more effective border security and prevent tribunals. cross-border trafficking of weapons, mercenaries G Engage local Liberian NGOs in policy-setting and and natural resources. decision-making processes in order to ensure G Amend the Liberian DDRR mandate to thorough and effective implementation of its incorporate foreign nationals fighting in Liberia mandate. into national or sub-regional disarmament programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Arms Trafficking in the Border Regions Of
    REPORT ON ARMS TRAFFICKING IN THE BORDER REGIONS OF SUDAN, UGANDA AND KENYA (A case Study of Uganda: North, Northeastern & Eastern) By Action For Development of Local Communities (ADOL) WITH SUPPORT FROM SWEDISH GOVERNMENT AND ACTION OF CHURCHES TOGETHER (ACT), NETHERLANDS. APRIL - JUNE, 2001. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................. 3 1.1. BACKGROUND 7 1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES, COVERAGE AND METHODOLOGY 8 2.0. RESEARCH FINDINGS ............................................................................ 10 2.1 MARKETS 10 2.2 ROUTES AND MODES OF ARMS TRAFFICKING 14 Map 2 showing Gun Market Belts 15 2.2 SOURCES OF SMALL ARMS AND AMMUNITIONS 16 2.3 DEALERS AND BUYERS OF SMALL ARMS AND AMMUNITIONS 17 2.4 NETWORKS AND OTHER METHODS OF ARMS ACQUISITION 18 Diagram 1: CURRENT NETWORK OF GUNS AND AMMUNITION SALES 20 2.5 EFFECTS OF GUN TRAFFICKING ON COMMUNITIES 21 2.6 EFFORTS TO CURB GUN TRAFFICKING 21 2.7 IMPACT OF GUN TRAFFICKING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES 23 3.0 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 25 APPENDICES .................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX 1 26 APPENDIX 2 28 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study was conducted in the districts of Moroto, Kotido, Nakapiripirit, Katakwi, Soroti, Kumi, Lira, Kitgum, Gulu, Pader, Adjumani, Moyo, Yumbe, and Kapchorwa with the following objectives: ♦ Collect first hand data from local authorities, community leaders, businessmen, police personnel and the army on the sources and causes of arms trafficking in the border regions of Sudan, Uganda and Kenya. ♦ Collect information on the location of gun markets, the quantity of traded arms, and the motives for trading in arms and ammunitions as well as the networks in which the gun traffickers operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Illegal Firearms Trafficking
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance Monograph Reducing Illegal Firearms Trafficking Promising Practices and Lessons Learned Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street NW. Washington, DC 20531 Janet Reno Attorney General Daniel Marcus Acting Associate Attorney General Mary Lou Leary Acting Assistant Attorney General Nancy E. Gist Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs World Wide Web Home Page www.ojp.usdoj.gov Bureau of Justice Assistance World Wide Web Home Page www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA For grant and funding information contact U.S. Department of Justice Response Center 1–800–421–6770 This document was prepared by Police Executive Research Forum, supported by coopera- tive agreement number 96–DD–BX–K005, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Of- fice of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not nec- essarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Bureau of Justice Assistance Reducing Illegal Firearms Trafficking Promising Practices and Lessons Learned July 2000 Monograph NCJ 180752 Reducing Illegal Firearms Trafficking Foreword Throughout the United States, violence involving firearms remains at an alarmingly high rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Arms Trafficking Will Even Give Them Direct Access—At a Lower Cost—To Weapons
    98903 Trafficking and Fragility in West Africa Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Côme Dechery and Laura Ralston Public Disclosure Authorized Fragility, Conflict, and Violence Group World Bank 2015 1 1 Table of Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 What is Trafficking? .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Regional criminal markets and trafficking in West Africa ............................................................ 5 1.3 The region’s evolving criminal economy .................................................................................... 5 1.4 Internal factors: Crime and governance in West Africa ............................................................... 6 1.5 External factors: Market trends in worldwide trafficking ............................................................ 7 1.6 The routes and hubs of West African trafficking ......................................................................... 9 1.7 The prevalence and nature of trafficking flows in the region .................................................... 12 2. Five channels between trafficking and fragility: Trafficking and its impact on West Africa .. 13 2.1 Channel 1—A source
    [Show full text]
  • International Regional and Subregional Instruments
    KENYA NATIONAL FOCAL POINT AND LIGHT WEAPONS SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS PROLIFERATION PRESENTATION ON NATIONAL DATA ON ILLICIT ARMS FLOW AND IMPACT ON POLICY 1 Arms Trafficking flows in Kenya Much of the Great Lakes region and the Horn of Africa is awash with guns, predominantly small arms, and a large number of those weapons spill over into Kenya. Since the late 1970s countries bordering Kenya to the north (Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, and Uganda) among them have experienced long periods of unrest and internal armed conflict. Fighters from wars in these countries are a prime source of weapons brought into Kenya, which they often sell for subsistence. In addition, kinship ties among pastoralist communities that straddle international borders can facilitate the movement of firearms from one side to another, as well as the spread of localized conflicts. Kenya is vulnerable to illicit weapons trafficking through the same channels used for legal arms shipments.The country has long been a major transit point for illegal weapons shipments destined to war-torn countries in the Great Lakes region of Africa. The existence of an abusive armed conflict in the recipient country in some circumstances risks the weapons being diverted to an unauthorized third party (or of spilling back into Kenya) unscrupulous arms brokers and shipping agents in most cases use false documents, misdeclare cargo, file false flight plans, hide weapons in secret compartments in motor vehicles and shipping containers, and other covert tactics to traffic weapons undetected. However, Kenyan customs authorities take a number of steps to rein in such illegalities, but better techniques and equipment are required to more systematically halt undeclared arms shipments.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Homeland Security Role in the Mexican War Against Drug Cartels
    THE U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY ROLE IN THE MEXICAN WAR AGAINST DRUG CARTELS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 31, 2011 Serial No. 112–14 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 72–224 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY PETER T. KING, New York, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas HENRY CUELLAR, Texas GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia LAURA RICHARDSON, California CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois TIM WALBERG, Michigan BRIAN HIGGINS, New York CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota JACKIE SPEIER, California JOE WALSH, Illinois CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan BEN QUAYLE, Arizona WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia VACANCY BILLY LONG, Missouri VACANCY JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas MO BROOKS, Alabama MICHAEL J. RUSSELL, Staff Director/Chief Counsel KERRY ANN WATKINS, Senior Policy Director MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Thread: Arms and Ammunition Tracing in Sudan and South Sudan
    32 Following the Thread: Arms and Ammunition Tracing in Sudan and South Sudan By Jonah Leff and Emile LeBrun Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2014 First published in May 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Tania Inowlocki Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Rick Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-9700897-1-1 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 32 Contents List of boxes, figures, maps, and tables .......................................................................................................................... 5 List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Africa in Arms Taking Stock of Efforts for Improved Arms Control
    This project is funded by the European Union Issue 03 | January 2018 Africa in arms Taking stock of efforts for improved arms control Nelson Alusala Summary The future of Africa’s development is intrinsically linked to the continent’s ability to take charge of its peace and security. The African Union (AU) Commission is best placed to lead this process. However, the organisation and its member states have continuously been challenged by the widespread and uncontrolled flow of arms and ammunition. The AU Commission and its affiliated sub-regional organisations have put into place a number of initiatives and mechanisms that align their efforts with global processes, but Africa is yet to fully enjoy the dividends of these measures. This paper reviews the achievements attained so far, explores some of the drivers of the demand for arms and identifies recommendations for bolstering existing efforts. Recommendations To strengthen current efforts, the AU, regional economic communities (RECs) and regional mechanisms (RMs) should consider the following: • Strengthening stockpile management systems within member states. This should include the construction of modern armouries and capacity building for relevant personnel. • Enforcing the implementation of arms embargoes, in collaboration with the UN sanctions committees and embargo monitoring groups. This paper focuses on: • Addressing terrorism comprehensively. Terrorism is increasingly becoming a major driver for illicit arms flows. There is an urgent need for the AU and its sub-regional organisations to coordinate efforts to eliminate this growing menace. • Regulating artisanal arms manufacturers. These manufacturers should be supported in a framework that allows them to operate in a more formalised way.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic 2: Illicit Small Arms Trade There Are 857 Million Firearms in The
    Topic 2: Illicit Small Arms Trade There are 857 million firearms in the hands of civilians, an overwhelming 84.6% of all small arms around the globe. Of those 857 million, only 100 million are registered. The number of firearms in civilian hands is rapidly increasing as demand soars. Within the United States, this number is growing at an annual rate of 4.13%. Mexico, Yemen, Pakistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, and Ukraine are all listed under the top 25 countries with the most firearms (Karp). These same countries are listed as a portion of the top 15 war-torn countries (Nag). The arms flowing in and out of these countries is not regulated, if not illegal, and are used by citizens to engage in civil war. Though each country has its own laws about small arms and who can obtain them, 10-20% of all small arms are obtained illegally (Chander). All regions of the world are linked in the illicit small arms trade. Some countries have strict gun laws, while other are undeveloped and lack the infrastructure necessary to produce small arms. In both cases, civilians of those countries may turn to the black market. Officials in different locations take bribes and turn a blind eye to the weapons entering into the country (Stohl). The illicit small arms trade is a global issue, with manufacturers, brokers, and consumers spread out amongst different continents, and therefore requires a global solution. The illegal small arms trade has wreaked havoc upon many countries as it has allowed terrorists to access guns and other small weapons that they have used to commit violent crimes (“Illicit Arms”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms Trade Treaty's Interaction with Other Related Agreements
    Research Paper Elli Kytömäki International Security Department | February 2015 The Arms Trade Treaty’s Interaction with Other Related Agreements Contents Summary 2 Introduction 5 The ATT in the Landscape of Arms Control Instruments 7 The ATT at the Intersection of Other Policy Areas 12 The ATT’s Potential Contribution to Other Instruments 18 Conclusions and Recommendations 25 Acronyms and Abbreviations 26 References 27 About the Author 32 1 | Chatham House The Arms Trade Treaty’s Interaction with Other Related Agreements Summary The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), in force since 24 December 2014, is the first international, legally binding instrument to establish the ‘highest possible common international standards for regulating or improving the regulation of the international trade in conventional arms’ (Article 1). The treaty was not created in a vacuum. It exists alongside a range of previously established international, regional and sub-regional instruments. These include measures to combat terrorism, organized crime and piracy, and to prevent the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons (SALW). The ATT’s institutional context also encompasses frameworks to increase the transparency of weapons trading and possession, to increase transparency in military expenditure and to support development assistance. As states parties start to implement the ATT, its links with and impact on other instruments will be of crucial importance. A range of instruments1 partly overlap with the ATT, but the treaty was not developed to replace or duplicate them. This raises numerous questions. Could implementation of the treaty bring cross-cutting benefits, efficiency gains or cost savings? How could the ATT advance wider policy objectives such as combating piracy or corruption? How could it support implementation of other instruments? At the same time, there are concerns that the increasingly complex web of related instruments could produce confusion and contradiction.
    [Show full text]