DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2102.00349V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 31 Jan 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2102.00349V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 31 Jan 2021 Non-relativistic Effective Quantum Mechanics of the Coulomb Interaction David M. Jacobs1, ∗ and Matthew Jankowski2 1Physics Department, Norwich University 158 Harmon Dr, Northfield, VT 05663 2Physics Department, Hamilton College 198 College Hill Rd., Clinton, NY 13323 (Dated: February 2, 2021) We apply the ideas of effective field theory to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Utilizing an artificial boundary of ignorance as a calculational tool, we develop the effective theory using bound- ary conditions to encode short-ranged effects that are deliberately not modeled; thus, the boundary conditions play a role similar to the effective action in field theory. Unitarity is temporarily violated in this method, but is preserved on average. As a demonstration of this approach, we consider the Coulomb interaction and find that this effective quantum mechanics can predict the bound state energies to very high accuracy with a small number of fitting parameters. It is also shown to be equivalent to the theory of quantum defects, but derived here using an effective framework. The method respects electromagnetic gauge invariance and also can describe decays due to short-ranged interactions, such as those found in positronium. Effective quantum mechanics appears applicable for systems that admit analytic long-range descriptions, but whose short-ranged effects are not re- liably or efficiently modeled. Potential applications of this approach include atomic and condensed matter systems, but it may also provide a useful perspective for the study of blackholes. I. INTRODUCTION approximated as a delta-function potential. There are two notable limitations to the analysis in [2]: (1) be- Effective field theory (EFT) has had many successes cause all non-trivial ` 6= 0 solutions to the Schrodinger within subfields of physics that include condensed mat- equation are not normalizeable, the method applies only ter, particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology. The for s-states (` = 0) and (2) it does not reproduce the success of an effective field theory depends on a hierarchy Rydberg-Ritz formula, the more accurate bound state of scales; the momenta or wavelengths of the experimen- energy formula in which the quantum defect is energy- tal probes or observations of a system must be markedly dependent [3]. different from the scale(s) of the processes not described, The motivation of [4] was to extract a useful effec- at least in detail, by the effective theory. tive theory that would apply for all angular momentum In this work we apply many of the ideas of EFT to states. In that work a finite region of space encompass- quantum mechanics. The starting point of our discus- ing the origin was omitted from analysis, thereby naively sion begins with the description of contact interactions, obviating the need to discard the non-trivial ` 6= 0 solu- or delta-functions potentials, in quantum mechanics in tions. The radius of what is referred to as the boundary of two and three dimensions. It is known that such po- ignorance, rb was interpreted as a kind of short-distance tentials sometimes require elaborate regularization and cutoff on which the boundary conditions effectively cap- renormalization schemes to ensure physically sensible re- ture the omitted physics. In order to enforce unitarity sults are obtained [1]. In [1] it was advocated that non- conservation, however, the limit rb ! 0 had to be taken trivial boundary conditions are a preferable alternative at the end of any calculation; it follows that the analy- method to using delta functions. sis of [4] only reproduces the results of [2]. Thereafter, When applied to bound Coulomb states, this non- results in [5, 6] demonstrated similar results using an ef- trivial boundary condition method { also known as the fective field theory of point particles. method of self-adjoint extension { has been shown to pro- In [7], it was finally realized that violation of unitar- ity is not necessarily a problem if the violation is only arXiv:2102.00349v1 [physics.atom-ph] 31 Jan 2021 duce energy levels that obey Rydberg's formula, at least when the boundary condition parameter is small and pro- temporary because the norm of a state function averages portional to the quantum defect [2]. In [2] it was shown to unity. Therefore it is not necessary to take the limit that a unique boundary condition can provide an effec- rb ! 0 to arrive at a useful theory. From another point tive description of \UV" physics near the origin, such as of view, one should not need to have a complete descrip- the effect of a finite nuclear radius or the Darwin fine- tion of a system to arbitrarily short distance from the structure correction { really anything that is, or may be origin, just as the framework of EFT does not require a complete understanding of a theory to arbitrarily large momentum. Recall that for a one-dimensional system described by ∗Electronic address: [email protected] a scalar potential and a boundary at the coordinate x = 2 II. BOUNDARY CONDITION AND xb, all eigenmodes must obey the same (Robin) boundary CONSEQUENCES condition in a standard analysis, i.e. The dynamics of a point charge of mass m and charge 0 Q coupled electromagnetically is described by the Hamil- i(xb) + Z (xb) = 0 ; (1) i tonian 2 where the modes are labelled by generic index i, and Z ~p − QA~ is a real number; for example, Z = 0 corresponds to H = + Q' : (3) the Dirichlet condition. The central equation of [7] is 2m what results from promoting the boundary condition to We expect that the boundary condition (2) can be pro- be mode-dependent, i.e. Z!Zi, or moted to a spherically symmetric and gauge-invariant version, namely 0 i(xb) + Zi i(xb) = 0 : (2) Ri(rb) + Zi(rb) DrRi(rb) = 0 ; (4) Because the boundary condition varies for different eigen- where modes, this theory is not instantaneously hermitian or unitary; however, those standard conditions do hold Dr = @r − iQAr ; (5) when averaged over sufficiently long times1. and Ar is the radial component of the vector potential, In this article we significantly extend the analysis of A~. It would then follow that, under a local U(1) trans- [7], demonstrating that this approach can be success- formation of the wave function and the electromagnetic fully applied in three dimensions with coupling to the field characterized by the function Ω, full electromagnetic gauge field. We devote the bulk of our effort to analysis of hydrogenic atoms and arrive at Ψ = eiQΩΨ0 the theory of quantum defects, albeit using a different A~ = A~0 + r~ Ω framework from earlier analyses (see, e.g., a well-known ' = '0 − Ω_ ; (6) review by Seaton [8]). The theoretical framing here is in the same spirit as that of effective field theory, however equation (4) will be invariant. we do not appeal to a Lagrangian formalism. We start We derive (4) by mandating conservation of probability with the Schrodinger equation, using a Hamiltonian valid associated with a single eigenmode where, for simpler at long distance; the conditions of the wavefunction on notation, we note that Ψ represents such a mode: the boundary of ignorance play a role analogous to the effective action. We therefore consider this method to be d Z (Ψ; Ψ) = − dV r · J~ = 0 ; (7) a demonstration of what can be called effective quantum dt mechanics. ~ In Section II we derive the three-dimensional version where the probability current density J following from of the boundary condition (2) that respects electromag- the Hamiltonian (3) is netic gauge invariance and discuss its consequences. In i h i Section III we analyze the bound states of the Coulomb J~ = (rΨ∗)Ψ − Ψ∗ (rΨ) + 2iQA~ jΨj2 : (8) problem and derive the theory of quantum defects as a 2m consequence of a low-energy effective theory describing Given the spherically symmetric boundary at r = rb, and the broken SO(3)⊗SO(3) symmetry of the Schrodinger- separability of the eigenmode as Coulomb problem. In Section IV we check the effective −i!t method against synthetically-generated data for a UV- Ψ = e R (r) Y`m (θ; φ) ; (9) complete model of an extended nucleus. In Section V we consider the successes and limitations of this non- the divergence theorem may be used to demonstrate that relativistic theory applied to real systems. In Section VI we consider decaying states. In Section VII we conclude ∗ ∗ with a discussion of our results, list possible applications, (DrR) R − R DrR = 0 ; (10) and mention some outstanding issues. Throughout this r=rb article we use the natural unit convention ~ = c = 1. where Dr is as defined in (5). Following [9], one may then multiply by an arbitrary constant w with units of length and define the dimensionless complex quantities 1 Unitarity violation appears to be a consequence of only consid- x ≡ R(rb) (11) ering the domain x ≥ xb, whereas a particle can in reality prop- agate in and out of the omitted region, 0 ≤ x < xb. y ≡ wDrR(r)jr=rb ; (12) 3 time, but the same cannot be said for composite state. Following [7], consider the state so that equation (10) is then equivalent to Υ = ciΨi + cjΨj ; (18) jx + iyj2 − jx − iyj2 = 0 : (13) for two complex coefficients, ci and cj. We assume the The argument of the two terms above have an equal mag- standard normalization condition nitude and differ only by an arbitrary phase factor eiθ; it 2 2 follows that jc1j + jc2j = 1 ; (19) θ which will be justified below. The inner product of the R(rb) − cot wDrR(r) = 0 ; (14) 2 composite state with itself is therefore r=rb ∗ ∗ which is boundary condition (4) once we make the iden- hΥ; Υi = 1 + ci cjhΨi; Ψji + cj cihΨj; Ψii : (20) tification The last two offending terms do not vanish because the θ eigenmodes are not instantaneously orthogonal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward Quantum Simulation with Rydberg Atoms Thanh Long Nguyen
    Study of dipole-dipole interaction between Rydberg atoms : toward quantum simulation with Rydberg atoms Thanh Long Nguyen To cite this version: Thanh Long Nguyen. Study of dipole-dipole interaction between Rydberg atoms : toward quantum simulation with Rydberg atoms. Physics [physics]. Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 2016. English. NNT : 2016PA066695. tel-01609840 HAL Id: tel-01609840 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01609840 Submitted on 4 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DÉPARTEMENT DE PHYSIQUE DE L’ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE LABORATOIRE KASTLER BROSSEL THÈSE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE Spécialité : PHYSIQUE QUANTIQUE Study of dipole-dipole interaction between Rydberg atoms Toward quantum simulation with Rydberg atoms présentée par Thanh Long NGUYEN pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE Soutenue le 18/11/2016 devant le jury composé de : Dr. Michel BRUNE Directeur de thèse Dr. Thierry LAHAYE Rapporteur Pr. Shannon WHITLOCK Rapporteur Dr. Bruno LABURTHE-TOLRA Examinateur Pr. Jonathan HOME Examinateur Pr. Agnès MAITRE Examinateur To my parents and my brother To my wife and my daughter ii Acknowledgement “Voici mon secret.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hydrogen Atom (Finite Difference Equation/Discrete Wave Vectors/Bohr-Rydberg Formula) FREDERICK T
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 83, pp. 5753-5755, August 1986 Chemistry Discrete wave mechanics: The hydrogen atom (finite difference equation/discrete wave vectors/Bohr-Rydberg formula) FREDERICK T. WALL Department of Chemistry, B-017, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Contributed by Frederick T. Wall, March 31, 1986 ABSTRACT The quantum mechanical problem of the hy- its wave vector energy counterpart.* If V is small compared drogen atom is treated by use of a finite difference equation in to mc2, then V and l9 are substantially the same, but for large place of Schrodinger's differential equation. The exact solu- negative values of V, the two can be significantly different. tion leads to a wave vector energy expression that is readily The next question to be answered is how the potential en- converted to the Bohr-Rydberg formula. (The calculations ergy is introduced into the finite difference equation. In our here reported are limited to spherically symmetric states.) The problem, we shall write that wave vectors reduce to the familiar solutions of Schrodinger's equation as c -- w. The internal consistency and limiting be- O(r - A) - 2(X + V/mc2)4(r) + /(r + A) = 0, [2] havior provide support for the view that the equations em- ployed could well constitute an approach to a relativistic for- with mulation of wave mechanics. X = = (1 - 26/E)"2 [3] In an earlier paper (1), I set forth a simple difference equa- EI/E tion for the wave mechanical description of a free particle. This was accompanied by a postulatory basis for interpreting where & is the wave vector energy, and certain parameters related to the energy, thus appearing to provide a possible connection to relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Note to 8.13 Students
    Note to 8.13 students: Feel free to look at this paper for some suggestions about the lab, but please reference/acknowledge me as if you had read my report or spoken to me in person. Also note that this is only one way to do the lab and data analysis, and there are nearly an infinite number of other things to do that would be better. I made some mistakes doing this lab. Here are a couple I found (and some more tips): Use a smaller step and get more precise data than what we had. Then fit • a curve, don’t just pick out a peak. The Hg calibration is actually something like a sin wave instead of a cubic. • Also don’t follow the old version of Melissionos word for word. They use an optical system with a prism oppose to a diffraction grating. We took data strategically so we could use unweighted fits • The mystery tube was actually N, whoops my bad. We later found a • drawer full of tubes and compared the colors. It was obviously N. Again whoops, it was our first experiment okay?! 1 Optical Spectroscopy Rachel Bowens-Rubin∗ MIT Department of Physics (Dated: July 12, 2010) The spectra of mercury, hydrogen, deuterium, sodium, and an unidentified mystery tube were measured using a monochromator to determine diffrent properties of their spectra. The spectrum of mercury was used to calibrate for error due to optics in the monochronomator. The measurements of the Balmer series lines were used to determine the Rydberg constants for hydrogen and deuterium, 7 7 1 7 7 1 Rh =1.0966 10 0.0002 10 m− and Rd=1.0970 10 0.0003 10 m− .
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics for Beginners OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 10/3/2020, Spi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 10/3/2020, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 10/3/2020, SPi Quantum Mechanics for Beginners OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 10/3/2020, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 10/3/2020, SPi Quantum Mechanics for Beginners with applications to quantum communication and quantum computing M. Suhail Zubairy Texas A&M University 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 10/3/2020, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © M. Suhail Zubairy 2020 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2020 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics
    Quantum Mechanics Richard Fitzpatrick Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Intendedaudience................................ 5 1.2 MajorSources .................................. 5 1.3 AimofCourse .................................. 6 1.4 OutlineofCourse ................................ 6 2 Probability Theory 7 2.1 Introduction ................................... 7 2.2 WhatisProbability?.............................. 7 2.3 CombiningProbabilities. ... 7 2.4 Mean,Variance,andStandardDeviation . ..... 9 2.5 ContinuousProbabilityDistributions. ........ 11 3 Wave-Particle Duality 13 3.1 Introduction ................................... 13 3.2 Wavefunctions.................................. 13 3.3 PlaneWaves ................................... 14 3.4 RepresentationofWavesviaComplexFunctions . ....... 15 3.5 ClassicalLightWaves ............................. 18 3.6 PhotoelectricEffect ............................. 19 3.7 QuantumTheoryofLight. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 3.8 ClassicalInterferenceofLightWaves . ...... 21 3.9 QuantumInterferenceofLight . 22 3.10 ClassicalParticles . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 3.11 QuantumParticles............................... 25 3.12 WavePackets .................................. 26 2 QUANTUM MECHANICS 3.13 EvolutionofWavePackets . 29 3.14 Heisenberg’sUncertaintyPrinciple . ........ 32 3.15 Schr¨odinger’sEquation . 35 3.16 CollapseoftheWaveFunction . 36 4 Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics 39 4.1 Introduction ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Physics (UCSD Physics 130)
    Quantum Physics (UCSD Physics 130) April 2, 2003 2 Contents 1 Course Summary 17 1.1 Problems with Classical Physics . .... 17 1.2 ThoughtExperimentsonDiffraction . ..... 17 1.3 Probability Amplitudes . 17 1.4 WavePacketsandUncertainty . ..... 18 1.5 Operators........................................ .. 19 1.6 ExpectationValues .................................. .. 19 1.7 Commutators ...................................... 20 1.8 TheSchr¨odingerEquation .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 20 1.9 Eigenfunctions, Eigenvalues and Vector Spaces . ......... 20 1.10 AParticleinaBox .................................... 22 1.11 Piecewise Constant Potentials in One Dimension . ...... 22 1.12 The Harmonic Oscillator in One Dimension . ... 24 1.13 Delta Function Potentials in One Dimension . .... 24 1.14 Harmonic Oscillator Solution with Operators . ...... 25 1.15 MoreFunwithOperators. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 26 1.16 Two Particles in 3 Dimensions . .. 27 1.17 IdenticalParticles ................................. .... 28 1.18 Some 3D Problems Separable in Cartesian Coordinates . ........ 28 1.19 AngularMomentum.................................. .. 29 1.20 Solutions to the Radial Equation for Constant Potentials . .......... 30 1.21 Hydrogen........................................ .. 30 1.22 Solution of the 3D HO Problem in Spherical Coordinates . ....... 31 1.23 Matrix Representation of Operators and States . ........... 31 1.24 A Study of ℓ =1OperatorsandEigenfunctions . 32 1.25 Spin1/2andother2StateSystems . ...... 33 1.26 Quantum
    [Show full text]
  • The Frequency of Electron Rotation and the Frequency of Light Emitted
    European J of Physics Education Volume 10 Issue 3 1309-7202 Chen THE FREQUENCY OF ELECTRON ROTATION AND THE FREQUENCY OF LIGHT EMITTED Jing Chen University of Northern British Columbia Prince George, BC Canada V2N 4Z9 [email protected] 1-250-960-6480 http://web.unbc.ca/~chenj/ (Received 15.07.2019, Accepted 07.08.2019) Abstract We calculate the frequency of matter-wave of electrons orbiting the hydrogen nucleus at the ground state. It is the same as the value of light frequency corresponding to the ground state from the Rydberg’s formula. The result will stimulate students’ interest to further understand the mechanisms of quantum theory. Keywords: Electron rotation, the Bohr radius, the frequency of light. 20 European J of Physics Education Volume 10 Issue 3 1309-7202 Chen INTRODUCTION The frequency of light emitted from an atom is the difference of energy of an electron at different orbits. However, there is no detailed investigation on the relation between the frequency of electrons orbiting the nucleus and the frequency of light emitted from the atom. We will study this relationship. METHODOLOGY We will consider a hydrogen atom from the classical picture. An electron is rotating around the nucleus. The speed of the electron is v. The mass of the electron is m. Coulomb’s constant is k. The electric charge of the proton and the electron is e. The distance from the electron to the nucleus is r, which has the value of the Bohr radius. Then E, the total energy of the electron rotating around the nucleus is � = 1/2 ��^2 − � �^2/� (1) The electric force on the electron is � = � �^2/�^2 = �� = � �^2/� (2) From (2), � �^2/�^2 = � �^2/� which can be simplified into, �^2 = � �^2/�� Or � = �√(�/��) (3) 21 European J of Physics Education Volume 10 Issue 3 1309-7202 Chen We will calculate f, the frequency of the electron orbiting the nucleus, � = �/2�� = �/2�� √(�/��) (4) Applying the value of each parameter into (4), we get � = 6.5796 × 10^15 (5) This is the frequency of electron orbiting around the hydrogen nucleus at the ground state.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Correction of the Rydberg Formula
    Journal of Modern Physics, 2020, 11, 294-303 https://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp ISSN Online: 2153-120X ISSN Print: 2153-1196 Relativistic Correction of the Rydberg Formula Koshun Suto Chudai-Ji Temple, Isesaki, Japan How to cite this paper: Suto, K. (2020) Abstract Relativistic Correction of the Rydberg Formula. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, The relationship E = −K holds between the energy E and kinetic energy K of 294-303. the electron constituting a hydrogen atom. If the kinetic energy of the elec- https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.112018 tron is determined based on that relationship, then the energy levels of the Received: January 10, 2020 hydrogen atom are also determined. In classical quantum theory, there is a Accepted: February 18, 2020 formula called the Rydberg formula for calculating the wavelength of a pho- Published: February 21, 2020 ton emitted by an electron. In this paper, in contrast, the formula for the wa- velength of a photon is derived from the relativistic energy levels of a hydro- Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. gen atom derived by the author. The results show that, although the Rydberg This work is licensed under the Creative constant is classically a physical constant, it cannot be regarded as a funda- Commons Attribution International mental physical constant if the theory of relativity is taken into account. License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Keywords Open Access Rydberg Formula, Rydberg Constant, Classical Quantum Theory, Energy-Momentum Relationship in a Hydrogen Atom, Relativistic Kinetic Energy 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Квантна Музика Quantum Music
    Квантна музика Quantum I/2018 Music Реч уреднице Editor's Note ема броја 24 „Квантна музика“ инспирисана је истоименим Тмеђународним пројектом кофинансираним од стране Европске Уније у оквиру програма Креативна Европа (2015–2018). По први пут је институција из Србије – Музиколошки институт САНУ – била носилац пројекта из програма Креативна Европа, а конзорцијум партнера и придружених партнера окупио је Music Квантна институције из Србије, Словеније, Данске, Холандије и Уједињеног Краљевства. У темату посвећеном квантној музици објављујемо радове аутора који су непосредно учествовали у реализацији овог пројекта, али и научника који су се прикључили пројекту током музика његовог одвијања, као и текстове аутора који нису ни на који начин Quantum Quantum везани за овај пројекат, већ се, независно од нашег конзорцијума, баве сродним истраживањима. Укупно девет текстова, чији су аутори по примарној вокацији физичари, математичари, инжењери, композитори, музиколози и пијанисти, осветљава различите музика аспекте прожимања квантне физике и музике. Quantum he main theme of No 24 “Quantum Music” was inspired by the Teponymous international project co-funded by the Creative Europe programme of the European Union (2015–2018). For the first time, an institution from Serbia – the Institute of Musicology SASA – was the Квантна Music project leader within the Creative Europe programme, and a consortium of partners and affiliated partners comprised institutions from Serbia, Slovenia, Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. This issue contains articles written by the authors who directly participated in this project, but also the scientists who joined the project during its realisation, as well as articles by authors who are not in any way related to this project – however, they are involved in a similar or related research within their own institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics and Atomic Physics Lecture 2: Rutherfordrutherford--Bohrbohr Atom and Dbdebrog Lie Matteratter--Waves Prof
    Quantum Mechanics and Atomic Physics Lecture 2: RutherfordRutherford--BohrBohr Atom and dBdeBrog lie Matteratter--Waves http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/ugrad/361 Prof. Sean Oh HW schedule changed!! First homework due on Wednesday Sept 14 and the second HW will be due on Monday Sept 19! HW1 Will be posted today Review from last time Planck’s blackbody radiation formula Explained phenomena such as blackbody radiation and the photoelectric effect. Light regarded as stream of particles, photons because m=0 Also, E=hfE=hf(f: frequency), so pc=hfpc=hf Î p=hf/c= h/λ, because λ=c/f (λ: wave length, c: speed of light) Composition of Atoms If matter is primarily composed of atoms, what are atoms composed of? J.J. Thomson (1897): Identification of cathode rays as electrons and measurement of ratio (e/m) of these particles Electron is a constituent of all matter! Humankind’s first glimpse into subatomic world! Robert Millikan (1909): Precise measurement of electric charge Showed that particles ~1000 times less massive than the hydrogen atom exist Ru the rfo rd, w ith Ge ige r & Ma rs de n (1910): Es ta blis he d the nuclear model of the atom Atom = compact positively charged nucleus surrounded by an orbiting electron clo ud Thomson Model of Atoms (1898) Uniform, massive positive charge Much less massive point electrons embedded inside. Radius R. Rutherford’s α --scatteringscattering apparatus Ernest Rutherford, with Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden scattered alpha particles from a radioactive source off of a thin gold foil. (1911) http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/hframe.html Alpha deflection off of an electron --44 o Experiment was set up to see if any θ~me/mα ~ 10 rad < 0.01 alpha particles can be scattered But what about deflection off a through a l a rge an g le.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Atom – Lyman Series Rydberg’S Formula Hydrogen 91.19Nm Energy Λ = Levels 1 1 0Ev − M2 N2
    Hydrogen atom – Lyman Series Rydberg’s formula Hydrogen 91.19nm energy λ = levels 1 1 0eV − m2 n2 Predicts λ of nàm transition: Can Rydberg’s formula tell us what ground n (n>m) state energy is? m (m=1,2,3..) -?? eV m=1 Balmer-Rydberg formula Hydrogen energy levels 91.19nm 0eV λ = 1 1 − m2 n2 Look at energy for a transition between n=infinity and m=1 1 0 ≡ 0eV hc hc ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ Einitial − E final = = ⎜ 2 − 2 ⎟ λ 91.19nm ⎝ m n ⎠ -?? eV hc − E final = E 13.6eV 91.19nm 1 = − Hydrogen energy levels A more general case: What is 0eV the energy of each level (‘m’) in hydrogen? … 0 ≡ 0eV hc hc ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ Einitial − E final = = ⎜ 2 − 2 ⎟ λ 91.19nm ⎝ m n ⎠ -?? eV hc 1 1 − E = E = −13.6eV final 91.19nm m2 m m2 Balmer/Rydberg had a mathematical formula to describe hydrogen spectrum, but no mechanism for why it worked! Why does it work? Hydrogen energy levels 410.3 486.1Balmer’s formula656.3 nm 434.0 91.19nm λ = 1 1 − m2 n2 where m=1,2,3 and where n = m+1, m+2 The Balmer/Rydberg formula correctly describes the hydrogen spectrum! Is it a good model? The Balmer/Rydberg formula is a mathematical representation of an empirical observation. It doesn’t really explain anything. How can we explain (not only calculate) the energy levels in the hydrogen atom? Next step: A semi-classical explanation of the atomic spectra (Bohr model) Rutherford shot alpha particles at atoms and he figured out that a tiny, positive, hard core is surrounded by negative charge very far away from the core.
    [Show full text]
  • Bohr's Model of Atom Manual 2017
    Exercise 9 Energy levels of hydrogen atom. Rydberg constant. Aim Spectra analyses of light emitted by hydrogen atoms, determining of ionization energy of hydrogen atom and Rydberg constant on the basis of electron transitions observation between energy levels. Required theoretical knowledge Emission spectrum of hydrogen atom in visible light, Balmer series, Rydberg formula. Bohr model of the atom, energy states, Rydberg constant, spectral series Lyman (ultraviolet), Paschen, Brackett, Pfund (infrared). Ionization energy of hydrogen atom. Diffraction grating, diffraction grating equation. Emission and absorption spectra, continuous spectrum, linear spectrum. Dependence of the energy of light on the wavelength. Equipment Spectroscopic lamps: helium and hydrogen, handle for lamps, power supply adapter 0 – 10 kV, stand, diffraction grating, micro spectrometer with optical waveguide, computer. Measurement plan: A. Diffraction grating: 1. Carefully set a helium lamp in a stand and connect to the power supply. 2. Carry out observations of a spectrum emitted by the lamp; observe the discharge lamp through a diffracting grating. Problems for discussion: Starting from the equation of the diffraction grating, indicate in the observed spectrum zero, first and second line position. What is the order of the spectrum? Using the equation of the diffraction grating indicate, which the lines correspond to a longer wavelength and which to the shorter ones. B. Transmission between energy levels 1. Turn on the power supply of the spectrometer – red diode should be lighting. 2. Insert an optical waveguide terminal into a hole in a lamp shield. 3. Launch the computer program „SPM” for the spectrometer. In „settings” („Ustawienia”) assume: averaging 30 and the time at least 500 millisecond.
    [Show full text]