DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling and Targeted Field Surveys to Gap-Fill an Ecosystem Surveillance Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling and Targeted Field Surveys to Gap-Fill an Ecosystem Surveillance Network bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Using generalised dissimilarity modelling and targeted field surveys 2 to gap-fill an ecosystem surveillance network 3 4 Greg R. Guerin1,2*, Kristen J. Williams3, Emrys Leitch1,2, Andrew J. Lowe1, Ben Sparrow1,2 5 6 1School of Biological Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, 7 Australia 8 2Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network 9 3CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia 10 11 *Email: [email protected] 12 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 13 Abstract 14 1. When considering which sites or land parcels complement existing conservation or 15 monitoring networks, there are many strategies for optimising ecological coverage in the 16 absence of ground observations. However, such optimisation is often implemented 17 theoretically in conservation prioritisation frameworks and real-world implementation is 18 rarely assessed, particularly for networks of monitoring sites. 19 2. We assessed the performance of adding new survey sites informed by predictive modelling 20 in gap-filling the ecological coverage of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network’s 21 (TERN) continental network of ecosystem surveillance plots, Ausplots. Using plant cover 22 observations from 531 sites, we constructed a generalised dissimilarity model (GDM) in 23 which species composition was predicted by environmental parameters. We combined 24 predicted nearest-neighbour ecological distances for locations across Australia with practical 25 considerations to select regions for gap-filling surveys of 181 new plots across 18 trips. We 26 tracked the drop in mean nearest-neighbour distances in GDM space, and increases in the 27 actual sampling of ecological space through cumulative multivariate dispersion. 28 3. GDM explained 34% of deviance in species compositional turnover and retained 29 geographic distance, soil P, aridity, actual evapotranspiration and rainfall seasonality among 30 17 significant predictors. 31 4. Key bioregions highlighted as gaps included Cape York Peninsula, Brigalow Belt South, 32 South Eastern Queensland, Gascoyne and Dampierland. 33 5. We targeted identified gap regions for surveys in addition to opportunistic or project-based 34 gap-filling over two years. Approximately 20% of the land area of Australia received 35 increased servicing of biological representation, corresponding to a drop in mean nearest- 36 neighbour ecological distances from 0.38 to 0.33 in units of compositional dissimilarity. The 37 gain in sampled ecological space was 172% that from the previous 181 plots. Notable gaps 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 38 were filled in northern and south-east Queensland, north-east New South Wales and northern 39 Western Australia. 40 6. Biological scaling of environmental variables through GDM supports practical sampling 41 decisions for ecosystem monitoring networks. Optimising putative survey locations via 42 ecological distance to a nearest neighbour rather than to all existing sites is useful when the 43 aim is to increase representation of habitats rather than sampling evenness per se. Iterations 44 between modelled gaps and field campaigns provide a pragmatic compromise between 45 theoretical optima and real-world decision-making. 46 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 47 Introduction 48 Conservation planners have long grappled with the problem of how to maximise ecological 49 representation in the absence of perfect information on biodiversity (Albuquerque & Beier 50 2018). For example, finite budgets mean the acquisition of incompletely surveyed land 51 parcels to complement reserve systems must be prioritised. Indeed, much of the literature 52 concerning spatial representation deals with conservation planning (Ferrier 2002; Williams et 53 al. 2006; Arponen et al. 2008; Pennifold et al. 2017), and, in particular, reserve selection 54 (Faith & Walker 1996; Araújo et al. 2001; Engelbrecht et al. 2016). 55 Fewer studies have addressed optimising representation for targeted biological 56 surveys (Funk et al. 2005; Hortal & Lobo 2005; Ware et al. 2018) or the design of monitoring 57 networks (Stohlgren et al. 2011; Rose et al. 2016). Networks of ecosystem observation plots 58 have traditionally been designed to maximise spatial or environmental coverage using 59 stratification (Goring et al. 2016; Guerin et al. 2020). Even so, the problems of 60 complementary reserve selection and gap-filling monitoring networks are, in essence, the 61 same (Hopkins & Nunn 2010); both seek to maximise ecological coverage in the absence of 62 fine-scale biodiversity survey data. For this reason, biodiversity surrogates are often 63 employed to estimate and compare representativeness (Grantham et al. 2010). 64 While many easily measured indicators of biological pattern could serve as 65 surrogates, spatial information is most commonly employed, due to its relative ease of access 66 and high spatial coverage, and to enable interpolation between sparse data locations 67 (Rodrigues & Brook 2007). For example, environmental layers relating to soil type, climate 68 and land cover are frequently used as surrogates for ecological community composition, as 69 are maps of classified vegetation types or bioregions (Ware et al. 2018). The rationale for 70 environmental layers as surrogates is the assumption that species compositional turnover 71 occurs as a result of environmental heterogeneity, due to differences in realised species 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 72 niches (Araújo et al. 2001). However, while environmental layers represent the broad 73 environmental setting of ecological communities, they do not directly capture other key 74 drivers of finer scale species compositional turnover, such as local disturbance regimes, 75 microclimates, human impacts, and biotic interactions (Araújo et al. 2001; Peres-Neto et al. 76 2012; Goring et al. 2016). The spatial structure of ecological similarity (i.e., the degree to 77 which species are shared between locations in space or time) is well known and is the reason 78 that unstratified, systematic sampling performs reasonably at sampling ecological variation 79 (Peres-Neto et al. 2012; Goring et al. 2016; Guerin et al. 2020). While local (patch level) 80 drivers are opaque at large scales, ideally the purely spatial component of turnover would be 81 included in assessments of surrogates. 82 In terms of selecting additional sites that best complement the ecological pattern of an 83 existing set of sites, a range of optimisation strategies have been proposed that vary in terms 84 of effectiveness and computational efficiency. Stohlgren et al. (2011) used Maxent modelling 85 of the environmental coverage of monitoring site locations to select the most dissimilar 86 putative sampling sites. Another approach is to select new sites that maximise the pairwise 87 distances among all sample sites, so-called ‘Environmental Diversity’, which results in even 88 sampling across environmental space (Faith & Walker 1996; Faith et al. 2004; Albuquerque 89 & Beier 2018). 90 One realisation of environmental surrogate approaches is that ecological turnover is 91 rarely a linear function of environmental turnover. The relationship is often nonstationary, 92 with varying rates of turnover or even abrupt boundaries between compositionally distinct 93 communities or geographic ecotones between structural vegetation types (Ferrier et al. 2007; 94 Gibson et al. 2015; Goring et al. 2016). Generalised dissimilarity modelling (GDM; Ferrier et 95 al 2007) has become the standard in community ecology for deriving biotically-scaled 96 environmental surrogates (ecological environments) where sufficient biological training data 5 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.107391; this version posted June 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Working Paper
    CLIMATE ADAPTATION FLAGSHIP The implications of climate change for biodiversity conservation and the National Reserve System: the tropical savanna woodlands and grasslands Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper #13B Adam C Liedloff, Richard J Williams, David W Hilbert, Simon Ferrier, Michael Dunlop, Tom Harwood, Kristen J Williams and Cameron S Fletcher September 2012 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The implications of climate change for biodiversity conservation and the National Reserve System: the tropical savanna woodlands and grasslands / Adam C Liedloff ISBN: 978-1-4863-0214-7 (pdf) Series: CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship working paper series; 13B. Other Climate Adaptation Flagship, Richard J Williams, David W Hilbert, Authors/Contributors: Simon Ferrier, Michael Dunlop, Tom Harwood, Kristen J Williams and Cameron S Fletcher Enquiries Enquiries regarding this document should be addressed to: Adam C Liedloff CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Darwin, NT 564 Vanderlin Drive Berrimah NT 0828 [email protected] Enquiries about the Climate Adaptation Flagship or the Working Paper series should be addressed to: Working Paper Coordinator CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship [email protected] Citation Liedloff AC, Williams RJ, Hilbert DW, Ferrier S, Dunlop M, Harwood T, Williams KJ and Fletcher CS (2012). The implications of climate change for biodiversity conservation and the National Reserve System: the tropical savanna woodlands and grasslands. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper No. 13B. www.csiro.au/resources/CAF-working-papers Copyright and disclaimer © 2012 CSIRO To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Calls of New South Wales
    Bat calls of New South Wales Region based guide to the echolocation calls of microchiropteran bats Michael Pennay1 , Brad Law2 & Linda Reinhold3 1 New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation 2 State Forests of New South Wales 3 Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines Bat calls of New South Wales Bat calls of New South Wales Published by the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation May 2004 Copyright © NSW Department of Environment and Conservation ISBN 0 7313 6786 3 This guide is the result of a co-operative project between NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, now the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and State Forests of NSW (SFNSW). DEC provided project funding, management, staff, reference calls, preparation and printing. SFNSW provided part funding and granted support of staff time and expertise, reference calls and editing. Research was conducted under NPWS scientific licence number A2753 and SFNSW special purpose permit for research number 05466. Material presented in this publication may be copied for personal use or republished for non-commercial purposes provided that NSW Department of Environment and Conservation is fully acknowledged as the copyright owner. Apart from these purposes or for private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without written permission from NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. Inquiries should be addressed to the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. This publication should be cited as follows: Pennay, M., Law, B., Reinhold, L. (2004). Bat calls of New South Wales: Region based guide to the echolocation calls of Microchiropteran bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Reforms Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box A290 Sydney South NSW 1232
    Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Reforms Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box A290 Sydney South NSW 1232 21st June 2017 To the Office of Environment and Heritage, Stand Up For Nature is an alliance of environment, wildlife and heritage groups in support of strong biodiversity and native vegetation laws in NSW. Together we represent tens of thousands of people who want the NSW Government to safeguard the future of our unique wildlife, and our healthy soils and water resources. Stand Up For Nature members include: Nature Conservation Council of NSW | Total Environment Centre National Parks Association of NSW | Humane Society International The Wilderness Society | Colong Foundation for Wilderness | NSW WIRES WWF Australia |National Trust |Birdlife Australia IFAW We urge the NSW Government to abandon the draft Regulations and Codes under the Biodiversity Conservation 2016 and Local Land Services Amendment Act 2016 and develop strong biodiversity conservation laws that are scientifically robust and that will deliver improved environmental outcomes, now and for future generations. Please count this as our formal submission into these important documents, and do not hesitate to contact Daisy Barham, Campaigns Director, Nature Conservation Council on [email protected] for any further information. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 KEY ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE CODES AND REGULATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 Timeframe and the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map 2 Broad-scale land clearing 3 Threatened ecological communities 3 Koala
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of an Alien Fish Species in the Pilbara Region of Western
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 33 108–114 (2018) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.33(1).2018.108-114 Introduction of an alien fsh species in the Pilbara region of Western Australia Dean C. Thorburn1, James J. Keleher1 and Simon G. Longbottom1 1 Indo-Pacifc Environmental, PO Box 191, Duncraig East, Western Australia 6023, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Until recently rivers of the Pilbara region of north Western Australia were considered to be free of introduced fsh species. However, a survey of aquatic fauna of the Fortescue River conducted in March 2017 resulted in the capture of 19 Poecilia latipinna (Sailfn Molly) throughout a 25 km section of the upper catchment. This represented the frst record of an alien fsh species in the Pilbara region and the most northern record in Western Australia. Based on the size of the individuals captured, the distribution over which they were recorded and the fact that the largest female was mature, P. latipinna appeared to be breeding. While P. latipinna was unlikely to physically threaten native fsh species in the upper reaches of the Fortescue River, potential spatial and dietary competition may exist if it reaches downstream waters where native fsh diversity is higher and dietary overlap is likely. As P. latipinna has the potential to affect macroinvertebrate communities, some risk may also exist to the macroinvertebrate community of the Fortescue Marsh, which is located immediately downstream, and which is valued for its numerous short range endemic aquatic invertebrates. The current fnding indicated that despite the relative isolation of the river and presence of a low human population, this remoteness does not mean the river is safe from the potential impact of species introductions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Northern Australia
    THE NATURE OF NORTHERN AUSTRALIA Natural values, ecological processes and future prospects 1 (Inside cover) Lotus Flowers, Blue Lagoon, Lakefield National Park, Cape York Peninsula. Photo by Kerry Trapnell 2 Northern Quoll. Photo by Lochman Transparencies 3 Sammy Walker, elder of Tirralintji, Kimberley. Photo by Sarah Legge 2 3 4 Recreational fisherman with 4 barramundi, Gulf Country. Photo by Larissa Cordner 5 Tourists in Zebidee Springs, Kimberley. Photo by Barry Traill 5 6 Dr Tommy George, Laura, 6 7 Cape York Peninsula. Photo by Kerry Trapnell 7 Cattle mustering, Mornington Station, Kimberley. Photo by Alex Dudley ii THE NATURE OF NORTHERN AUSTRALIA Natural values, ecological processes and future prospects AUTHORS John Woinarski, Brendan Mackey, Henry Nix & Barry Traill PROJECT COORDINATED BY Larelle McMillan & Barry Traill iii Published by ANU E Press Design by Oblong + Sons Pty Ltd The Australian National University 07 3254 2586 Canberra ACT 0200, Australia www.oblong.net.au Email: [email protected] Web: http://epress.anu.edu.au Printed by Printpoint using an environmentally Online version available at: http://epress. friendly waterless printing process, anu.edu.au/nature_na_citation.html eliminating greenhouse gas emissions and saving precious water supplies. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry This book has been printed on ecoStar 300gsm and 9Lives 80 Silk 115gsm The nature of Northern Australia: paper using soy-based inks. it’s natural values, ecological processes and future prospects. EcoStar is an environmentally responsible 100% recycled paper made from 100% ISBN 9781921313301 (pbk.) post-consumer waste that is FSC (Forest ISBN 9781921313318 (online) Stewardship Council) CoC (Chain of Custody) certified and bleached chlorine free (PCF).
    [Show full text]
  • Cape York Peninsula Parks and Reserves Visitor Guide
    Parks and reserves Visitor guide Featuring Annan River (Yuku Baja-Muliku) National Park and Resources Reserve Black Mountain National Park Cape Melville National Park Endeavour River National Park Kutini-Payamu (Iron Range) National Park (CYPAL) Heathlands Resources Reserve Jardine River National Park Keatings Lagoon Conservation Park Mount Cook National Park Oyala Thumotang National Park (CYPAL) Rinyirru (Lakefield) National Park (CYPAL) Great state. Great opportunity. Cape York Peninsula parks and reserves Thursday Possession Island National Park Island Pajinka Bamaga Jardine River Resources Reserve Denham Group National Park Jardine River Eliot Creek Jardine River National Park Eliot Falls Heathlands Resources Reserve Captain Billy Landing Raine Island National Park (Scientific) Saunders Islands Legend National Park National park Sir Charles Hardy Group National Park Mapoon Resources reserve Piper Islands National Park (CYPAL) Wen Olive River loc Conservation park k River Wuthara Island National Park (CYPAL) Kutini-Payamu Mitirinchi Island National Park (CYPAL) Water Moreton (Iron Range) Telegraph Station National Park Chilli Beach Waterway Mission River Weipa (CYPAL) Ma’alpiku Island National Park (CYPAL) Napranum Sealed road Lockhart Lockhart River Unsealed road Scale 0 50 100 km Aurukun Archer River Oyala Thumotang Sandbanks National Park Roadhouse National Park (CYPAL) A r ch KULLA (McIlwraith Range) National Park (CYPAL) er River C o e KULLA (McIlwraith Range) Resources Reserve n River Claremont Isles National Park Coen Marpa
    [Show full text]
  • Your Great Barrier Reef
    Your Great Barrier Reef A masterpiece should be on display but this one hides its splendour under a tropical sea. Here’s how to really immerse yourself in one of the seven wonders of the world. Yep, you’re going to get wet. southern side; and Little Pumpkin looking over its big brother’s shoulder from the east. The solar panels, wind turbines and rainwater tanks that power and quench this island are hidden from view. And the beach shacks are illusory, for though Pumpkin Island has been used by families and fishermen since 1964, it has been recently reimagined by managers Wayne and Laureth Rumble as a stylish, eco- conscious island escape. The couple has incorporated all the elements of a casual beach holiday – troughs in which to rinse your sandy feet, barbecues on which to grill freshly caught fish and shucking knives for easy dislodgement of oysters from the nearby rocks – without sacrificing any modern comforts. Pumpkin Island’s seven self-catering cottages and bungalows (accommodating up to six people) are distinguished from one another by unique decorative touches: candy-striped deckchairs slung from hooks on a distressed weatherboard wall; linen bedclothes in this cottage, waffle-weave in that; mint-green accents here, blue over there. A pair of legs dangles from one (Clockwise from top left) Book The theme is expanded with – someone has fallen into a deep Pebble Point cottage for the unobtrusively elegant touches, afternoon sleep. private deck pool; “self-catering” such as the driftwood towel rails The island’s accommodation courtesy of The Waterline and the pottery water filters in is self-catering so we arrive restaurant; accommodations Pumpkin Island In summer the caterpillars Feel like you’re marooned on an just the right shade of blue.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change in the South East Queensland Region
    Photo: Tourism Queensland Tourism Photo: Climate change in the South East Queensland Region Rainfall Data Temperature Data Tewantin Post Office This regional summary describes Sunshine Coast the projected climate change Regional Council for the South East Queensland (SEQ) region. Somerset Regional Council Moreton Bay Regional Council Projected average temperature, Brisbane rainfall and evaporation for Brisbane City Redland Lockyer UQ Gatton Council City 2030, 2050 and 2070 under low, Valley Council Regional Amberley Council Ipswich City Council Logan medium and high greenhouse City Harrisville Council Post Office Gold gas emissions scenarios are Coast Scenic Rim City compared with historical Regional Council Council climate records. New South Wales SEQ_Map A regional profile Climate and Photo: Tourism Queensland landscape South East Queensland Key findings is home to the state’s capital, Brisbane, which has a sub-tropical Temperature climate. Rainfall in the region • Average annual temperature in SEQ has increased 0.4 °C is influenced both by tropical over the last decade (from 19.4 °C to 19.8 °C). systems from the north and fluctuations in the high pressure • Projections indicate an increase of up to 4 °C by 2070; leading ridge to the south. to annual temperatures well beyond those experienced over the last 50 years. South East Queensland is • By 2070, Amberley may have more than three times the number Australia’s fastest growing region. of days over 35 °C (increasing from an average of 12 per year The population of SEQ is heavily to 41 per year), Brisbane may have six times the number of urbanised and is generally hot days (increasing from an average of one per year to an average concentrated along the coast of six per year) and Tewantin may have nearly four times the between Noosa and Coolangatta.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Structure of Vertebrate Communities Across the Australian
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1059–1070 ORIGINAL Phylogenetic structure of vertebrate ARTICLE communities across the Australian arid zone Hayley C. Lanier*, Danielle L. Edwards and L. Lacey Knowles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary ABSTRACT Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Aim To understand the relative importance of ecological and historical factors Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA in structuring terrestrial vertebrate assemblages across the Australian arid zone, and to contrast patterns of community phylogenetic structure at a continental scale. Location Australia. Methods We present evidence from six lineages of terrestrial vertebrates (five lizard clades and one clade of marsupial mice) that have diversified in arid and semi-arid Australia across 37 biogeographical regions. Measures of within-line- age community phylogenetic structure and species turnover were computed to examine how patterns differ across the continent and between taxonomic groups. These results were examined in relation to climatic and historical fac- tors, which are thought to play a role in community phylogenetic structure. Analyses using a novel sliding-window approach confirm the generality of pro- cesses structuring the assemblages of the Australian arid zone at different spa- tial scales. Results Phylogenetic structure differed greatly across taxonomic groups. Although these lineages have radiated within the same biome – the Australian arid zone – they exhibit markedly different community structure at the regio- nal and local levels. Neither current climatic factors nor historical habitat sta- bility resulted in a uniform response across communities. Rather, historical and biogeographical aspects of community composition (i.e. local lineage per- sistence and diversification histories) appeared to be more important in explaining the variation in phylogenetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Evergreen Vine Thickets of the Brigalow Belt (North and South) And
    145° 150° 155° Semi-evergreen vine thickets of the Brigalow Belt (North and South) and ° ° Nandewar Bioregions 0 Charters Towers 0 2 " 2 - - This is an indicative map only and it is not intended for fine scale assessment. Mackay " Legend Winton " Ecological community likely to occur Brigalow Belt (North and South) and Nandewar Bioregions Emerald " Major Roads Gladstone " Note: The areas of Semi-evergreen vine thickets of the Blackall Brigalow Belt (North and South) and Nandewar Bioregions in " Queensland shown on this map all contain the ecological community but may have varying proportions of other communities Bundaberg mixed within the Semi-evergreen vine thickets. ° " ° 5 5 2 2 - - Source: Semi-evergreen vine thickets of the Brigalow Belt (North and South) and Nandewar Bioregions. The distribution in Queensland consists of Regional Ecosystems Nos 11.3.11, 11.4.1, 11.5.15, 11.8.13, 11.9.4, 11.11.18, 11.2.3, 11.8.3, 11.8.6, and 11.9.8 as defined by Sattler, P. and Williams, R. (eds) (1999). The Conservation of Queensland's Bioregional Ecosystems, Qld EPA Roma and mapped by Queensland Herbarium (Remnant Vegetation 2005 " v5). The distribution in NSW is from the Department of the Environment and Heritage's Native Vegetation Information System (NVIS), 2006. The following attributes were mapped from the Dalby 'Source_Code' field; e3 - Semi-evergreen Vine Thicket. Addtional areas " were derived according to Benson, J.S., Dick, R. and Zubovic, A. Brisbane " (1996). Semi-evergreen vine thicket vegetation at Derra Derra Ridge, Bingara, New South Wales. Cunninghamia 4(3): 497-510; and the Nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg the Short Range-Endemics of the Pilbara Bioregion
    Appendix 3 Supporting Technical Studies Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Prepared for: Covalent Lithium January 2019 Final Report May 2017 Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6014 P: (08) 9285 8722 F: (08) 9285 8811 E: [email protected] ABN: 55 124 110 167 Report Number: 298 Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 31 May 2017 Final Stuart Halse Email 24 November 17 Final V2 Anton Mittra Email 14 January 2019 BEC_Mt Holland_SRE_final_V2_10i2019.docx This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd. i Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Covalent Lithium proposes to mine lithium at the Earl Grey deposit (the Proposal) approximately 100 km southeast of Southern Cross in Western Australia. This desktop review examines the likelihood that short-range endemic (SRE) invertebrates and listed terrestrial invertebrate species occur in the Proposal area and whether these species are likely to be impacted by proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Nature's Safety Net 2008
    Building Nature’s Safety Net 2008 Progress on the Directions for the National Reserve System Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Telstra is a proud partner of the WWF Building Nature's Map sources and caveats Safety Net initiative. The Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia © WWF-Australia. All rights protected (IBRA) version 6.1 (2004) and the CAPAD (2006) were ISBN: 1 921031 271 developed through cooperative efforts of the Australian Authors: Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage WWF-Australia and the Arts and State/Territory land management agencies. Head Office Custodianship rests with these agencies. GPO Box 528 Maps are copyright © the Australian Government Department Sydney NSW 2001 of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts 2008 or © Tel: +612 9281 5515 Fax: +612 9281 1060 WWF-Australia as indicated. www.wwf.org.au About the Authors First published March 2008 by WWF-Australia. Any reproduction in full or part of this publication must Paul Sattler OAM mention the title and credit the above mentioned publisher Paul has a lifetime experience working professionally in as the copyright owner. The report is may also be nature conservation. In the early 1990’s, whilst with the downloaded as a pdf file from the WWF-Australia website. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Paul was the principal This report should be cited as: architect in doubling Queensland’s National Park estate. This included the implementation of representative park networks Sattler, P.S. and Taylor, M.F.J. 2008. Building Nature’s for bioregions across the State. Paul initiated and guided the Safety Net 2008.
    [Show full text]