DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical-Council.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical-Council.Pdf Background The French Revolution was perhaps one of the most consequential periods in European history. It was a time of instability, ideological shift, and violence that saw the end of traditional monarchy in one of the most powerful European countries of the era. There is no single cause of the French Revolution. Instead, it is the culmination of conditions that have existed in the country for decades. Starting from the reign of Louis XIV, France amassed large amounts of debt that was most profoundly felt by the lower class. At the same time, the Enlightenment was taking hold, with thinkers such as Rousseau, Voltaire, and Montesquieu publishing works that questioned the very foundation of French society. Along with this, the coronation of an incompetent king and the recent success of the American Revolution all stimulated revolutionary sentiments in the country. The Enlightenment The Enlightenment marked a period of ideological shift in Europe, starting from 1685 and culminating during the French Revolution in 1789. During this era, people started to embrace rationality and believe humanity could be improved through logical reasoning alone. As a result, people became more skeptical and, instead of blind obedience, they demanded empirical proof for something to be true. Thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Denis Diderot, Pierre Bayle, and Voltaire all contributed to this intellectual movement. However, it is perhaps Jean-Jacques Rousseau who is the most important philosopher when considering the French Revolution. In his work, The Social Contract (1762), Rousseau asserts the state should be determined by the ​ “general will” of the people. In a good society, people consent to having their government limit some freedoms in exchange for safety and a better life. However, the state should still preserve people’s natural rights and liberties. Most importantly, if citizens do not agree with the state, then it is their duty to abolish the government and restart (Reill and Wilson). SiMUN Historical Crisis Council 1 The Monarchy Beginning with the reign of Louis XIV, France engaged in major military conflicts that made it the European power of the time. Louis XIV sought out wars to bring glory to the nation. However, his reckless spending coupled with a series of unsuccessful wars deeply impoverished France. In addition, special privileges given to the clergy and nobility, such as their exemption from taxation and their accessibility to the king, further contributed to France’s debt and created tensions with the lower class. These issues were not addressed during the reign of Louis XV nor by Louis XVI, both regarded as weak leaders. With the rise of Enlightenment, people started to question the necessity of the monarchy and the legitimacy of the divine right of kings (State). France Before the Revolution Before the revolution, French society was structured as what is known as the ancien régime. ​ ​ The king was as the head of state, a single ruler who held absolute power over the country. Besides the king, French society was divided into three Estates: the First Estate composed of the clergy, the Second Estate consisted of the nobility, and the Third Estate represented the rest of the population. This rigid social structure decreased social mobility, meaning that even the SiMUN Historical Crisis Council 2 most intelligent, skillful, affluent people of the lower class could not move up in the social ladder (Haberman, Arthur, et al. 160). Furthermore, France was on the verge of bankruptcy when Louis XVI came to the throne. Due to France’s warfare in the past, Louis XVI mainly used France’s revenue to service its debt. In addition, the First and Second Estates were exempt from taxes, meaning that France’s only source of income was through peasants and the lower class. The growing population coupled with high unemployment aggravated the situation. Plus, droughts in the spring and hailstorms in the summer in the years leading up to the Revolution further devastated French peasants through the increase in the price of grain. Widespread hunger and a government that did very little to alleviate the situation triggered peasants into revolt (L. Frey and M. Frey 3). Recent Events The Estates-General May of 1789, in acknowledgement of France’s pressing political and economic issues, King Louis XVI called for the Estates-General. It was a gathering of representatives from all three Estates to discuss issues, with each Estate drawing up a list of grievances (cahiers de doleances) that highlighted their concerns. While members ​ ​ of the First and Second Estates proposed a constitutional monarchy and a free press, it was the Third Estate that was the most drastic, demanding a new constitution that called for freedom and social equality based on ideas from the Enlightenment. Even though the Third Estate comprised of 95 percent of the population, they had the same amount of votes as the first two Estates. This meant that the first two Estates always outvoted the Third Estate in favour of preserving their own privileges. This enraged delegates of the Third Estate, leading to the formation of the National Assembly. On June 17, the Third Estate swore the Tennis Court Oath that promised the National Assembly would continue on until France has a written constitution, marking the beginning of the Revolution (Wilde). Storming of Bastille SiMUN Historical Crisis Council 3 As tensions increase, a mob of revolutionaries invaded the Bastille prison on July 14, 1789, which was regarded as a symbol of royal power and oppression. Three-hundred revolutionaries stormed the prison, seizing stockpiles of guns and ammunition. The city hall was captured and the mayor was executed. As Paris fell into chaos, King Louis XVI was forced to recognize the National Assembly. This use of violence for political means will become a hallmark of the French Revolution (Allen). Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen As the National Assembly tried to restore order, they made reforms such as the abolition of tithes, seigneurial rights, and exemption from taxation. On August 26, 1789, the National Assembly published the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, ​ ​ a fundamental document based on Enlightenment ideals and the recently drafted American Constitution that emphasized natural rights, freedom, and rule of law. It proclaimed that natural rights are universal and inalienable to all (Llewellyn and Thompson). Slaves were considered free once they reached the mainland of France, and all citizens were subject to the same basic set of rules. This council starts September 1st, 1789, subsequent to these events. Questions to Consider 1. Considering the establishment of the National Assembly, what should be the new role of the king? How much and what kind of power should the king possess? Should there be a monarchy at all? 2. Taking into account Enlightenment ideals that founded the French Revolution, how does each member of the council interpret such ideals differently? What rights are people entitled to? How can the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of ​ the Citizen be effectively enforce implemented? ​ 3. Widespread famine was a cause of the Revolution. How does this council plan to repair the French economy and address its debt problem? What can be done to help peasants who are currently starving? 4. What is the best way to deal to with enemies of the Revolution? How can the National Assembly maintain control through the chaos and fighting factions? What are possible consequences of such control? When considering these questions, bear in mind your individual’s own beliefs and ambitions during the Revolution. Further Resources http://www1.curriculum.edu.au/ddunits/downloads/pdf/dec_of_rights.pdf http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/French_Revolution http://www.history.com/topics/french-revolution http://historylists.org/events/list-of-10-major-events-of-the-french-revolution.html SiMUN Historical Crisis Council 4 http://serious-science.org/parties-of-the-french-revolution-7211 https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/07/french-revolution-bastille-day-guide-jacobins- terror-bonaparte/ https://www.britannica.com/topic-browse/History/Age-of-Revolutions/French-Revol ution French Revolution Character Matrix Character Faction Background 1 Maximilien Extreme Jacobin As a French lawyer and politician, Robespierre Robespierre played a very prominent role during the French Revolution as a member of the Estates-General, the Constituent Assembly and the Jacobin Club. He was also known for being an advocate for democracy and of the poor, and often used violent means to accomplish missions. 2 Marquis de Moderate A hero of the American Revolution, the LaFayette Marquis de LaFayette is an aristocrat and represented the nobility during the Estates-General. Despite his class, he advocated for natural rights, supported the end of slavery, and helped draft the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. LaFayette was more ​ moderate in his politics and preferred a middle ground. 3 Jean-Paul Marat Extreme Jacobin A journalist known for fiercely advocating for basic human rights and as a defender of the sans-culottes. Marat’s views were uncompromising and made public through numerous pamphlets and newspapers. 4 Georges Danton Extreme Jacobin As the first president of the Committee of Public Safety, Danton was instrumental in the early phases of the Revolution and the rise of the Jacobin Club. He wanted to overthrow the French monarchy and establish a republic. 5 Jacques Hebert Herbertist/Radical Hebert was a French journalist who was the founder and editor of the Le ​ Père Duchesne, a radical newspaper. He ​ SiMUN Historical Crisis Council 5 was a leader of the French Revolution and had many followers called Herbertists, who advocated for the ​ dechristianization of France and supported extreme measures used in the Terror. 6 Jacques Pierre Girondin Brissot was a leading member of the Brissot (de Warville) Girondist movement during the French Revolution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789 Kiley Bickford University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Bickford, Kiley, "Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789" (2014). Honors College. 147. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/147 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONALISM IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 by Kiley Bickford A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (History) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Richard Blanke, Professor of History Alexander Grab, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History Angela Haas, Visiting Assistant Professor of History Raymond Pelletier, Associate Professor of French, Emeritus Chris Mares, Director of the Intensive English Institute, Honors College Copyright 2014 by Kiley Bickford All rights reserved. Abstract The French Revolution of 1789 was instrumental in the emergence and growth of modern nationalism, the idea that a state should represent, and serve the interests of, a people, or "nation," that shares a common culture and history and feels as one. But national ideas, often with their source in the otherwise cosmopolitan world of the Enlightenment, were also an important cause of the Revolution itself. The rhetoric and documents of the Revolution demonstrate the importance of national ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques-Louis David's 'Oath of the Tennis Court'
    EXTENSION ACTIVITIES – Jacques-Louis David’s ‘Oath of the Tennis Court’, 1791 Read the discussion of Jacques-Louis-David’s ‘Oath of the Tennis Court’ (1791) on p. 3-8 of this handout. Then complete the following extension activities: 1. One of the big problems which faced David as the Revolution progressed was that many of the figures to whom he had given prominence in the 1791 drawing fell from favour as political conditions changed. Using Liberating France (including the Who’s Who) and other sources, find out what happened to Mounier, Mirabeau, Bailly, Barère, Barnave, and Robespierre. Then research the clergymen, Abbé Grégoire and Abbé Sieyès. 2. David alludes to the popular movement which became known as the sans-culottes through the strong and robust figure in the red bonnet of liberty in the lower left hand corner. Referring to Liberating France (including the Section B Timeline), write a paragraph to outline the role played by the sans-culottes movement from 10 August 1792 until the days of Germinal and Prairial Year III, (1 April and 20-23 May 1795). 3. Using Liberating France (including the Who’s Who) and other sources, outline David’s revolutionary career – both as a painter and as a politician. In your answer consider the importance his paintings and drawings 1789-1795, and his role in organising public ceremonies. Then investigate his political activities as a deputy in the National Convention. 4. David uses at least eight revolutionary ideas in his 1791 study of the Tennis Court Oath. Locate them and any other revolutionary ideas not mentioned in the summary above.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Nationalism
    Shaping Nationalism The French Revolution • The French Revolution marked a turning point for European Nationalism • Marked the transition from Absolute Monarch to Republic The History Behind It • The revolution had been growing for some time, but the catalyst was the storming of the Bastille on July 14, 1789 • It was a prison and its capture by the mob was symbolic of the overtaking of tyranny • The news of the Bastilles capture spread across France and inspired people to take up arms against the king and aristocracy • It inspired the feeling that they were a nation and could govern themselves. • The idea of being the French Nation had entered the peoples’ collective consciousness • In pre-revolutionary France, society was divided into strict social order. • The Monarch, aristocracy and high-ranking clergy held most power Estates-General • The Estates General was an elected body of three groups 1. First Estate- clergy 2. Second Estate- aristocrats 3. Third Estate- common people • First and Second Estates tended to side together and outvote the Third. • June 1789, the Third Estate declared themselves the National Assembly and swore the Tennis Court Oath • France was influenced by the Renaissance ideas • Paris became the cultural capital of Europe • People were exposed to new ideas that questioned the nobility • Prior to the revolution, there was a growing middle class called the bourgeoisie. They were prosperous professionals and began to demand more say in decision making. Financial Factors • France had been at war and was basically broke
    [Show full text]
  • PROLOGUE Josephine Beheaded
    PROLOGUE Josephine Beheaded Marble like Greece, like Faulkner’s South in stone Deciduous beauty prospered and is gone . —Derek Walcott, “Ruins of a Great House,” Collected Poems There is a spectacle in Martinique’s gracious Savane park that is hard to miss. The statue honoring one of the island’s most famous citizens, Josephine Tascher, the white creole woman who was to become Napoleon’s lover, wife, and empress, is defaced in the most curious and creative of ways. Her head is missing; she has been decapitated. But this is no ordinary defacement: the marble head has been cleanly sawed off—an effort that could not have been executed without the help of machinery and more than one pair of willing hands—and red paint has been dripped from her neck and her gown. The defacement is a beheading, a reenactment of the most visible of revolutionary France’s punitive and socially purifying acts—death by guillotine. The biographical record shows Josephine born of a slaveholding family of declining fortunes, married into the ranks of France’s minor aristocracy, and surviving the social chaos of the French Revolution, which sentenced countless members of the ancien régime to the guillotine. In the form of this statue, she received her comeuppance in twentieth-century Martinique, where she met the fate that she narrowly missed a century earlier. Scratched on the pedestal are the words—painted in red and penned in creole— “Respe ba Matinik. Respe ba 22 Me” [Respect Martinique. Respect May 22]. The date inscribed here of the anniversary of the 1848 slave rebellion that led to the abolition of slavery on Martinique is itself an act of postcolonial reinscription, one that challenges the of‹cial French-authored abolition proclamation of March 31, 1848, and 2 CULTURAL CONUNDRUMS Statue of Josephine in Fort-de-France, Martinique, today.
    [Show full text]
  • French Revolution 1789–1795
    French Revolution 1789–1795 EVENTS THE THREE ESTATES 1789 May 1789 King Louis XVI of France calls a meeting of the Estates General (elected body of representatives from the Before the Revolution of 1789, three estates of French society; last convened in 1614) to French society was divided into solve financial crisis. Dispute begins over members’ powers three classes called estates. Members of the 3rd Estate were Jun 1789 Representatives of 3rd Estate declare themselves a denied the privileges of the 1st and National Assembly and swear, in the Tennis Court Oath, to 2nd estates. Revolutionaries fought draw up a new constitution for France. Members of 1st and against the injustice of this system, 2nd Estates join the National Assembly known as the “Old Regime.” Jul 1789 The Bastille (armory and political prison in Paris) is stormed by citizens after rumors that the King intends to 1st Estate suppress the National Assembly. Radicals form Paris Clergy of the Catholic Church 1790 Commune (to govern city) and National Guard volunteer (about 1% of population) force (to protect revolution). The Great Fear: peasant mobs ● Exempt from taxation overrun rural estates; many nobles leave France (they are ● Owned 20% of the land known as émigrés) ● Received annual payment of 10% of all citizens’ income Aug 1789 Rule of National Assembly begins (to Oct 1791) Aug 1789 Assembly issues the Declaration of the Rights of 2nd Estate Man (revolutionary manifesto and bill of human rights). Members of the nobility (about 2% Nobles and clergy agree to give up special
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon Reversing the French Revolution. HIST 3000 (Chicago
    Napoleon Reversing the French Revolution. HIST 3000 (Chicago Style) Napoleon Bonaparte turned France into a police state during his reign.1 However, he did not continue the French Revolution as the French people hoped. The French Revolution brought forth liberty and to do as ones will if it does not harm another.2 A new document brought by the French Revolution embodying these principles was the French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen in 1789.3 This Declaration stated under article 11 that there was to be a free flow of ideas and opinions in writing and the press.4 Article 7 outlawed any cruel harsh punishment and arbitrary sentencing.5 However, Napoleon reversed these fundamental principles of the French Revolution. Writers, the press, along with the French people were subjected to the General police and prefects and were banned from saying anything controversial, against his regime, anything about France’s revolutionary past, and against France’s allies.6 Arbitrary, cruel punishments, and harsh rules were enacted by Napoleon through the Penal Code in 1810.7 Napoleon did not continue the French Revolution and reversed it by turning France into a police state and monitored and censored the French people, the press, and writers. French Revolution embodiment The French Revolution exemplifies liberty and freedom.8 This was what the revolutionaries were fighting for during the revolution of 1789, and was not given to the French people during the Ancient Regime.9 The French Revolution, particularly the revolution of 1789, exemplified the 1 Philip G. Dwyer, Napoleon and Europe (Great Britain: Longman, 2001), Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • 21H.001 Lecture 12
    Endings & Beginnings 1 Recitation Debate Prompt: “The events in Egypt in 2011 and 2012 parallel developments in France from 1789 to 1794.” Prepare arguments for both the “pro” and “con” positions. 2 When did the French Revolution end? Satirical, post- Thermidorian print: “Robespierre guillotining the last executioner. This image is public domain 3 The Directory, 1795-1799 Vicomte Paul Barras, Aristocrat and Officer Paul Barras, These images are public domain 4 Director Jacques-Louis David, Portrait of Emmanuel- Josèph Sieyès, 1817 (Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University) This image is public domain 5 Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Citizens, 22 August 1795 Rights 2)Liberty consists in the power to do that which does not injure the rights of others. 3)Equality consists in this, that the law is the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. 4)Security results from the cooperation of all in order to assure the rights of each. 5)Property is the right to enjoy and to dispose of one’s goods, income, and the fruits of one’s labor and industry. Duties 1)The declaration of rights contains the obligations of the legislators; the maintenance of society requires that those who compose it should both know and fulfill their duties. 4)No one is a good citizen unless he is a good son, good father, good brother, good friend, good husband. 8)It is upon the maintenance of proerty that the cultivation of the land, all the productions, all means of labor, and the whole social ordre rest. 6 The Constitution of 1795 Legislature: Bicameral; Council of 500 to initiate all legislation; Council of Elders (250, married or widowed, over 40 years old) to pass or reject, but not amend, legislation from Council of 500; 2/3 of first councils to come from previous National Convention; has complete control over treasury and law, and can declare war Voting: Direct universal male suffrage over 21, but only eligible to vote for representatives to electoral assemblies.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH REVOLUTION PART 3 from the Directory 1794-1799 To
    FRENCH REVOLUTION PART 3 From the Directory 1794-1799 to Napoleon Bonaparte The Terror July 1793-July 1794 Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety Inscription on Engraving from 1795, after pyramid: Thermidor “Here lies all Robespierre guillotines the France.” executioner, after all France has been guillotined Constitutions of 1791 and 1793 are beneath his feet COUP D’ĖTAT OF THERMIDOR JULY Execution of Robespierre, 1794 Saint Just, Couthon July 1794 End of the Jacobin Terror, start of White Terror" -- execution of 72 leading Jacobins in one day The Directory takes power 1794- 1799 The Directory: July 1794-1799 Paul Barras one of the five Directors making up the executive council Legislature under Directory is Drawing of bicameral: member of Council of Council of Elders = upper house Elders -- pseudo-Roman Council of 500 = lower house robes Constitution of the Year V 1795 Third constitution – one every two years 1791, 1793 Ends universal male suffrage Indirect elections (electoral college like USA) Bicameral legislature upper house as more elite restraint on lower house LOUIS XVII -- never reigned son & heir of Louis XVI & Marie Antoinette b. 1785 d. 1795 June in prison of illness at age 10 (age 8 at time of Marie Antoinette’s trial) Set back for royalist hopes for restoration of monarchy – but the eventual Louis XVIII restored in 1814 was the brother (in exile since 1792) of King Louis XVI executed in Jan 1793. REVOLT OF GERMINAL (Spring 1795): Parisian sans culottes riot, call for "bread & Constitution of 1793," but no more political
    [Show full text]
  • Five Things You Should Know About the Declarations of the Rights of Man and Woman
    Five Things You Should Know about the Declarations of the Rights of Man and Woman 1. TENNIS, ANYONE? The National Assembly of France, governing after the outbreak of the French Revolution, approved the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. The National Assembly, the vestiges of the delegation of the Third Estate (everyone in France except the nobility and the clergy) delegation to the Estates-General, tried to create a new governing body and was locked out of its meeting room. In 1789, its members met at a nearby tennis court to swear an oath (known as the Tennis Court Oath) not to disband until they gave France a constitution. They began by proposing the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen. 2. AN AMERICAN HERO: Much of the declaration was taken from a draft done by General Marquis de Lafayette, a liberal and a heroic participant in the American Revolution as well as a hero at home in France, at the request of the National Assembly during the summer of 1789. He was ultimately disappointed in the more radical course of the revolution. 3. AN ENLIGHTENED PROPOSAL: The declaration reads as a tribute to the ideas of the Enlightenment. It embodies the ideas of John Locke’s theories of natural rights and social contract, Montesquieu’s separation of powers, Rousseau’s idea of general will, and Voltaire’s thoughts on equality and free speech. Another major influence was the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States. In all, seventeen articles were published, creating a document based on universal principles that encouraged further discussion of human rights and demanded clarification of the definition of “man and citizen.” The ideas of the Declaration of the Rights of Man were upheld in the 1791 constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the Future of France
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Visionaries in opposition: Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the future of France Seth J. Browner Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Browner, Seth J., "Visionaries in opposition: Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the future of France". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/621 Visionaries in opposition: Napoleon, Talleyrand, and the Future of France Seth Browner History Senior Thesis Professor Kathleen Kete Spring, 2017 2 Introduction: Two men and France in the balance It was January 28, 1809. Napoleon Bonaparte, crowned Emperor of the French in 1804, returned to Paris. Napoleon spent most of his time as emperor away, fighting various wars. But, frightful words had reached his ears that impelled him to return to France. He was told that Joseph Fouché, the Minister of Police, and Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, had held a meeting behind his back. The fact alone that Fouché and Talleyrand were meeting was curious. They loathed each other. Fouché and Talleyrand had launched public attacks against each other for years. When Napoleon heard these two were trying to reach a reconciliation, he greeted it with suspicion immediately. He called Fouché and Talleyrand to his office along with three other high-ranking members of the government. Napoleon reminded Fouché and Talleyrand that they swore an oath of allegiance when the coup of 18 Brumaire was staged in 1799.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution
    englIsh CHRONOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTION IN LYON TOPIC ROOM 18: THE FRENCH REVOLUTION 7 February 1790: Plundering of the Arsenal Imbert-Colomès ordered the muscadins to relieve the National Guard at the Arsenal, but the Guard, as representatives of the people, objected, took up arms and won the day, plundering the Arsenal. Colomès fled and tried to make Lyon the capital of royalist France, a place where emigrants could seek refuge. The Tricolour cockade, the cockade population immediately denounced this royalist conspiracy. of the lyon army during the siege of lyon in 1793, fabric, 1793, Inv. 513 The period of support (1789-1792) 14 March 1789: General Assembly of the three orders in the Cordeliers church In anticipation of the Estates General at Versailles in May 1789, a General Assembly composed of 300 clergymen, 317 noblemen and 350 delegates from the city and the surrounding area met at the Cordeliers church. It decided that each order would elect its own deputies and prepare a list of grievances. The third estate’s list included a demand for the abolition of the “octroi” taxes*, who se value had been increasing since the beginning of the 18th c. Plundering of the lyon arsenal, 7 February 1790, lithograph, 30 June - 5 July 1789: Berthault, 18th c., Inv. 55.80.4 July riots The failure of the debates at Versailles, the proclamation of 30 June 1790: the “National Assembly” by the third estate (17 June) and the Festival of the Federation Tennis Court Oath (20 June) led the king once again to invite As a prelude to the celebration of the Federation organised in the three new orders to debate.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Volume 17 (2017) Page 1
    H-France Review Volume 17 (2017) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 17 (September 2017), No. 152 Sophie Wahnich, La Révolution française n’est pas un mythe. Paris: Klincksieck, 2017. 247 pp. Notes. 25.00€ (pb). ISBN 978-2-252-04052-2. Review by Timothy Scott Johnson, Texas A & M University Corpus Christi To many historians of France, and in particular historians of the French Revolution, a study focused on readings of Jean-Paul Sartre, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Michel Foucault might seem of improbable relevance. However, Sophie Wahnich’s La Révolution française n’est pas un mythe makes a compelling case that engaging with these three thinkers’ views of history has significant historiographical and methodological value. Out of these three thinkers, Sartre is the only one who could be seen as engaging directly with the history of the Revolution, both in published and unpublished works. Yet it is Wahnich’s contention that the debates between these figures over the practice and epistemological status of history that began in the 1960s have influenced the historiography of the Revolution from the 1970s onward. At the center of this wide-ranging study is the claim that what began as an argument between Sartre, Lévi-Strauss, and Foucault about the status and practice of history eventually affected scholarly debates and practices within French Revolutionary studies and the attitude with which the French Revolution is approached today. Sartre’s Critique de la raison dialectique, published in 1960, attempted to reconcile his existentialist philosophy focused on the process of human freedom asserting itself with a Marxist vision of history.
    [Show full text]