DOCSLIB.ORG

USAF Coutnerproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #955

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAF Coutnerproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #955 Issue No. 955, 8 November 2011 Articles & Other Documents: Featured Article: U.N. Says Iran Is Working on Nuclear Arms 1. Iran Has Nuclear Explosive Testing Facility 2. Iran Dismisses Reported UN Claims of Nuclear Work 3. Iran Says IAEA's Documents on Its Missile Program "Baseless": FM 4. IAEA Says Foreign Expertise Has Brought Iran to Threshold of Nuclear Capability 5. China Tells Iran to Show 'Flexibility and Sincerity' over Nuclear Issue 6. Russia Says Timing of UN Report on Iran Nuclear Weapons ‘Wrong’ 7. Barak Not Optimistic about Int'l Will to Stop Iranian Nukes 8. Iran Says West Has ‘No Proof’ of Bomb Drive 9. Israeli Minister Warns Iran Strike is Possible 10. U.N. Says Iran Is Working on Nuclear Arms 11. N. Korea's Uranium Program Close to Being Operational: Source 12. Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Vulnerable to Theft: Report 13. Pakistani Nukes Are 'Very Hard Targets': Musharraf 14. Pakistan Rejects Reports of Nuclear Insecurity 15. Threat to Pak Nukes Exists: US 16. US Invites Russia to Take Part in Antimissile Flight Test 17. Russia Rebukes US 'Look But Don't Touch' Offer on Missile Defense 18. Osama Bin Laden Was Betrayed by His Deputy 19. Ex-U.S. General Urges Frank Talk on Cyber Weapons 20. Rethink China's Nuke Weapons Strategy 21. No Optimism on NK Nukes 22. Nuclear Terrorism Threat 23. James A. Baker, on Reducing Nuclear Arms 24. More Documentation Of Iran's Relentless Pursuit Of Nukes 25. The Growing Threat of Iran’s Nuclear Program 26. Now For a Real Iran Debate Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats and countermeasures. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at http://cpc.au.af.mil/ for in-depth information and specific points of contact. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. Issue No. 955, 8 November 2011 The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Research & Education | Maxwell AFB, Montgomery AL Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7530 Financial Times – U.K. 5 November 2011 Iran Has Nuclear Explosive Testing Facility By James Blitz and agencies A report by the UN nuclear watchdog next week will support allegations that Iran has built a nuclear weapons testing facility, Reuters reported on Saturday. In its report, Reuters cites sources stating that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has obtained satellite pictures of a large steel container for carrying out tests with high explosives that could be used in nuclear weapons. The images of the site at Parchin, near Tehran, and other evidence lend credence to allegations by IAEA member states that the installation was intended for nuclear-related explosives testing. According to the sources that briefed Reuters, the IAEA will also reveal evidence next week that Iran has carried out computer modelling of a nuclear weapon. Western diplomats contacted by the FT on Saturday said that they would make no comment on the Reuters report. In recent days, western diplomats have said the keenly awaited report will strengthen suspicions that Tehran is seeking to develop a capability to make atomic bombs. However, the IAEA is expected to stop short of saying explicitly that Iran is definitely doing so. It was unclear when the container at Parchin was built or whether it was actually used for nuclear-related work. Iranian officials were not immediately available for comment. Suspicions of nuclear arms work at the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran date back at least to 2004 when a prominent nuclear expert said satellite images showed it could be a site for research, testing and production of nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is peaceful, has previously denied the allegations. In 2005, Iran allowed U, nuclear inspectors to visit Parchin. The IAEA in May listed seven areas of concern regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme, including high explosives manufacture and testing and the development, manufacture and testing of explosive components. One of the main hurdles in making an atomic bomb is designing a ring of conventional explosives to compress atomic material in the warhead core, igniting a nuclear chain reaction. Experiments have to be carried out to test the impact of explosions on bomb components. The IAEA report is expected to include other evidence of research and other activities that make little sense if not weapons-related, Western diplomats have said. Western powers believe Iran is secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons, but Tehran denies this, saying it is enriching uranium only to power reactors for electricity generation. Any evidence of nuclear weapons activities would strengthen calls for further sanctions against Iran. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d981ce22-07ba-11e1-b658-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1crjNHhn9 (Return to Articles and Documents List) Atlanta Journal-Constitution Saturday, November 05, 2011 Issue No. 955, 8 November 2011 United States Air Force Counterproliferation Research & Education | Maxwell AFB, Montgomery AL Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7530 Iran Dismisses Reported UN Claims of Nuclear Work By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press TEHRAN, Iran — New intelligence the U.N. atomic agency plans to release on alleged nuclear weapons work by Iran is fabricated, the Iranian foreign minister said Saturday. Diplomats have told The Associated Press that the International Atomic Energy Agency plans to reveal intelligence in the coming week suggesting Iran made computer models of a nuclear warhead, as well as other previously undisclosed details on alleged secret work by Tehran on nuclear arms. Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi accused the IAEA of giving in to U.S. pressure to level accusations against Iran, which insists its nuclear program is only for peaceful aims like energy production. "Iran has already responded to the alleged studies in 117 pages. We've said time and again that these are forgeries similar to faked notes," Salehi told a news conference in Tehran. Salehi, Iran's former nuclear chief, asserted that allegations proven false in the past are being reproduced. "The Americans raised documents like this in the past: the Niger scandal," he said, referring to claims — based on a forgery — that Iraq under Saddam Hussein had sought uranium from Niger. "The documents were used as a pretext to invade Iraq," Salehi said. "After killing tens of thousands of innocent people, it was discovered that it was a forged document." Iran has previously claimed that reports on alleged nuclear weapons activities were based on false information provided by a "few arrogant countries," a phrase authorities in Iran use to refer to the United States and its allies. Salehi accused the IAEA of violating its neutrality and siding with U.S. intelligence claims under new agency chief Yukiya Amano, saying he is using information that his predecessor, Mohamed ElBaradei, said the agency could not authenticate independently. "The IAEA should not do things under pressure. ... Iran's nuclear issue is not a technical or legal issue. It's a totally political case," Salehi said. Iran has in the past dismissed investigations by the IAEA into the so-called Green Salt Project, which the U.S. alleged was an Iranian plan studying diverse components of a nuclear weapons program, including uranium enrichment and high explosives testing. But Washington has refused to hand over the original documents to the IAEA and only presented a copy to the agency to support its claims. Iran has argued that U.S. reluctance to hand over original documents reinforces its assertion that they are forged. Iran is already under U.N. sanctions for its refusal to halt uranium enrichment, a technology that can be used to produce reactor fuel or material for a warhead. Iran insists its nuclear work is only to produce energy and conduct peaceful scientific research. http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/iran-dismisses-reported-un-1218488.html (Return to Articles and Documents List) Xinhua News – China Iran Says IAEA's Documents on Its Missile Program "Baseless": FM 6 November 2011 Issue No. 955, 8 November 2011 United States Air Force Counterproliferation Research & Education | Maxwell AFB, Montgomery AL Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7530 TEHRAN, Nov. 5 (Xinhua) -- Iran's Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Salehi said Saturday the documents of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on its missile program are "unfounded and baseless," the semi-official Mehr news agency reported. "The alleged documents claimed by the IAEA are baseless," Salehi said during a joint press conference with his visiting Burundian counterpart in Tehran, referring to reports that the IAEA will release some documents about Iran's missile program in the future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invisible Humans, Visible Terrorists: U.S. Neo-Orientalism Post 9/11 and Representations of the Muslim World" (2015)
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations January 2015 Invisible Humans, Visible Terrorists: U.S. Neo- Orientalism Post 9/11 and Representations of the Muslim World Khalid Mosleh Alrasheed Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Recommended Citation Alrasheed, Khalid Mosleh, "Invisible Humans, Visible Terrorists: U.S. Neo-Orientalism Post 9/11 and Representations of the Muslim World" (2015). Open Access Dissertations. 1082. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1082 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Graduate School Form 30 Updated 1/15/2015 PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis/dissertation prepared By Khalid Mosleh Alrasheed Entitled INVISIBLE HUMANS, VISIBLE TERRORISTS: U.S. NEO-OREINTALISM POST 9/11 AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE MUSLIM WORLD For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Is approved by the final examining committee: Prof. Aparajita Sagar Chair Prof. Shaun Hughes Prof. Alfred Lopez Prof. Ahmed Idrissi Alami To the best of my knowledge and as understood by the student in the Thesis/Dissertation Agreement, Publication Delay, and Certification Disclaimer (Graduate School Form 32), this thesis/dissertation adheres to the provisions of Purdue University’s “Policy of Integrity in Research” and the use of copyright material. Approved by Major Professor(s): Aparajita Sagar Approved by: Krista Ratcliffe 11/16/2015 Head of the Departmental Graduate Program Date i INVISIBLE HUMANS, VISIBLE TERRORISTS: U.S. NEO-ORIENTALISM POST 9/11 AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE MUSLIM WORLD A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Khalid M.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining 10 Warning Signs of Iran Nuclear Weapons
    International Committee In Search of Justice (ISJ) President: Dr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras Rue d’Arlon 63, B-1040 Brussels Belgium Tel : +32 2 400 1071 [email protected] www.isjcommittee.com EXAMINING 10 WARNING SIGNS OF IRAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 20,2014 Dr. Alejo Vidal Quadras, Former Vice‐President of European Parliament, Professor of Atomic and Nuclear Physics: “An objective, thoroughly researched report on the core issue of the nature of Iranian nuclear program and its status”. Bob Jospeh, Former US Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, Senior White House Security Council staff on weapons of mass destruction: “A critically important report at a critically important time”. John Bolton, former US Ambassador to the UN, former Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security: "A timely and well document report with alarming findings on Iran's nuclear program." Contents Executive summary Chapter 1: SPND (organ in charge of weaponization) Chapter 2: Procurement of dual purpose equipment and its possible use for military dimensions of nuclear program Chapter 3: Secret enrichment of uranium Chapter 4: Enrichment using laser technology Chapter 5: High explosives tests and trigger mechanism Chapter 6: Neutron initiator Chapter 7: Manufacturing uranium metal (uranium hemisphere) Chapter 8: Hydro-dynamic tests and explosion vessels at Parchin site Chapter 9: Research on nuclear warhead Chapter 10: Key scientists and researchers engaged in possible military dimensions of nuclear program International Committee In Search of Justice (ISJ) was initially formed in 2008 as an informal group of EU parliamentarians to seek justice for the Iranian democratic opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining 10 Warning Signs of Iran Nuclear Weapons Development
    International Committee In Search of Justice (ISJ) President: Dr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras Rue d’Arlon 63, B-1040 Brussels Belgium Tel : +32 2 400 1071 [email protected] www.isjcommittee.com EXAMINING 10 WARNING SIGNS OF IRAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 20,2014 Dr. Alejo Vidal Quadras, Former Vice‐President of European Parliament, Professor of Atomic and Nuclear Physics: “An objective, thoroughly researched report on the core issue of the nature of Iranian nuclear program and its status”. Bob Jospeh, Former US Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, Senior White House Security Council staff on weapons of mass destruction: “A critically important report at a critically important time”. John Bolton, former US Ambassador to the UN, former Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security: "A timely and well document report with alarming findings on Iran's nuclear program." Contents Executive summary Chapter 1: SPND (organ in charge of weaponization) Chapter 2: Procurement of dual purpose equipment and its possible use for military dimensions of nuclear program Chapter 3: Secret enrichment of uranium Chapter 4: Enrichment using laser technology Chapter 5: High explosives tests and trigger mechanism Chapter 6: Neutron initiator Chapter 7: Manufacturing uranium metal (uranium hemisphere) Chapter 8: Hydro-dynamic tests and explosion vessels at Parchin site Chapter 9: Research on nuclear warhead Chapter 10: Key scientists and researchers engaged in possible military dimensions of nuclear program International Committee In Search of Justice (ISJ) was initially formed in 2008 as an informal group of EU parliamentarians to seek justice for the Iranian democratic opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Iran a Glossary of Terms
    Nuclear Iran A Glossary of Terms Simon Henderson and Olli Heinonen Policy Focus 121 | May 2013 Update HARVARD Kennedy School A COPUBLICATION WITH BELFER CENTER for Science and International Affairs Map: Nuclear installations in Iran. TURKMENISTAN TABRIZ Bonab Lashkar Abad TEHRAN MASHAD Karaj Marivan Parchin Fordow Arak QOM IRAQ Natanz AFGHANISTAN Isfahan Ardakan Saghand Darkhovin Yazd IRAN KUWAIT SHIRAZ Bushehr PAKISTAN Gchine BANDAR ABBAS BAHRAIN SAUDI ARABIA QATAR © 2012 The Washington Institute for Near East Policy UAE OMAN Map: Nuclear installations in Iran. Nuclear Iran A Glossary of Terms Simon Henderson and Olli Heinonen Policy Focus 121 | May 2013 Update HARVARD Kennedy School A COPUBLICATION WITH BELFER CENTER for Science and International Affairs n n n The authors extend special thanks to Mary Kalbach Horan and her editorial team at The Washington Institute. n n n All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2012, 2013 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Copublished in 2012 and 2013 in the United States of America by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036; and the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 79 JFK St., Cambridge, MA 02138. Cover photo: Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified Fictions: the CIA, Secrecy Law, and the Dangerous Rhetoric of Authenticity
    Unclassified Fictions: The CIA, Secrecy Law, and the Dangerous Rhetoric of Authenticity Matthew H. Birkhold* ABSTRACT Zero Dark Thirty , Kathryn Bigelow’s cinematic account of the manhunt for Osama bin Laden, attracted tremendous popular attention, inspiring impassioned debates about torture, political access, and responsible filmmaking. But, in the aftermath of the 2013 Academy Awards, critical scrutiny of the film has abated and the Senate has dropped its much-hyped inquiry. If the discussion about Zero Dark Thirty ultimately proved fleeting, our attention to the circumstances of its creation should not. The CIA has a longstanding policy of promoting the accuracy of television shows and films that portray the agency, and Langley’s collaboration with Bigelow provided no exception. To date, legal scholarship has largely ignored the CIA’s policy, yet the practice of assisting filmmakers has important consequences for national security law. Recently, the CIA’s role in Zero Dark Thirty’s creation and the agency’s refusal to release authentic images of the deceased Osama bin Laden reveals its attitude toward fiction and how it impacts the CIA’s legal justifications for secrecy. By conducting a close analysis of CIA affidavits submitted in FOIA litigation and recently declassified records detailing the CIA’s interactions with Bigelow, this article demonstrates how films like Zero Dark Thirty function as workarounds where the underlying records are classified. These films are “unclassified fictions” in that they allow the CIA to preserve the secrecy of classified records by communicating nearly identical information to the public. Unclassified fictions, in other words, allow the CIA to evade secrecy while maintaining that secrecy—to speak without speaking.
    [Show full text]
  • AFI PREVIEW Is Published by the Age 46
    ISSUE 72 AFI SILVER THEATRE AND CULTURAL CENTER AFI.com/Silver JULY 2–SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 ‘90s Cinema Now Best of the ‘80s Ingrid Bergman Centennial Tell It Like It Is: Black Independents in New York Tell It Like It Is: Contents Black Independents in New York, 1968–1986 Tell It Like It Is: Black Independents in New York, 1968–1986 ........................2 July 4–September 5 Keepin’ It Real: ‘90s Cinema Now ............4 In early 1968, William Greaves began shooting in Central Park, and the resulting film, SYMBIOPSYCHOTAXIPLASM: TAKE ONE, came to be considered one of the major works of American independent cinema. Later that year, following Ingrid Bergman Centennial .......................9 a staff strike, WNET’s newly created program BLACK JOURNAL (with Greaves as executive producer) was established “under black editorial control,” becoming the first nationally syndicated newsmagazine of its kind, and home base for a Best of Totally Awesome: new generation of filmmakers redefining documentary. 1968 also marked the production of the first Hollywood studio film Great Films of the 1980s .....................13 directed by an African American, Gordon Park’s THE LEARNING TREE. Shortly thereafter, actor/playwright/screenwriter/ novelist Bill Gunn directed the studio-backed STOP, which remains unreleased by Warner Bros. to this day. Gunn, rejected Bugs Bunny 75th Anniversary ...............14 by the industry that had courted him, then directed the independent classic GANJA AND HESS, ushering in a new type of horror film — which Ishmael Reed called “what might be the country’s most intellectual and sophisticated horror films.” Calendar ............................................15 This survey is comprised of key films produced between 1968 and 1986, when Spike Lee’s first feature, the independently Special Engagements ............12-14, 16 produced SHE’S GOTTA HAVE IT, was released theatrically — and followed by a new era of studio filmmaking by black directors.
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA Decision to Find Iran in Non-Compliance, 2002–2006
    CASE STUDY SERIES 6 The International Atomic Energy Agency’s Decision to Find Iran in Non-Compliance, 2002–2006 Nima Gerami and Pierre Goldschmidt Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction National Defense University Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction National Defense University DR. JOHN F. REICHART Director DR. W. SETH CARUS Deputy Director, Distinguished Research Fellow Since its inception in 1994, the Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Center) has been at the forefront of research on the implications of weapons of mass destruction for U.S. security. Originally focusing on threats to the military, the WMD Center now also applies its expertise and body of research to the challenges of homeland security. The center’s mandate includes research, education, and outreach. Research focuses on understanding the security challenges posed by WMD and on fashioning effective responses thereto. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has designated the center as the focal point for WMD education in the joint professional military education system. Education programs, including its courses on countering WMD and consequence management, enhance awareness in the next generation of military and civilian leaders of the WMD threat as it relates to defense and homeland security policy, programs, technology, and operations. As a part of its broad outreach efforts, the WMD Center hosts annual symposia on key issues bringing together leaders and experts from the government and private sectors. Visit the center online at www.ndu.edu/WMDCenter/. Cover: IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei before start of regular Board of Governors meeting, Vienna, June 15, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • GOV/2006/27 Date: 28 April 2006
    Derestricted 12 June 2006 International Atomic Energ (This document has been derestricted at the meeting of the Board on 12 June 2006) Board of Governors GOV/2006/27 Date: 28 April 2006 Original: English For official use only Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran Report by the Director General 1. On 4 February 2006, the Board of Governors adopted a resolution (GOV/2006/14) in paragraph 1 of which it, inter alia, underlined that outstanding questions concerning the implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran1 (Iran) could best be resolved and confidence built in the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme by Iran responding positively to the Board’s calls for confidence building measures. In this context, the Board deemed it necessary for Iran to: • re-establish full and sustained suspension of all enrichment related and reprocessing activities, including research and development, to be verified by the Agency; • reconsider the construction of a research reactor moderated by heavy water; • ratify promptly and implement in full the Additional Protocol; • pending ratification, continue to act in accordance with the provisions of the Additional Protocol which Iran signed on 18 December 2003; • implement transparency measures, as requested by the Director General, including in GOV/2005/67, which extend beyond the formal requirements of the Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol, and include such access to individuals, documentation relating to procurement, dual use equipment, certain military-owned workshops and research and development as the Agency may request in support of its ongoing investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Program of Iran
    NuclearNuclear ProgramProgram ofof IranIran -- CurrentCurrent StatusStatus Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government 22 November 2010 This presentation is based on information publicly available since 2002 from 30 reports of the Director General of the IAEA. Background - Iranian nuclear program originates from 1950’s - Pre-revolution: = US, France and Germany were involved in the program = interested also to get fuel cycle technology - After the revolution: program was in decline until it was revitalized in mid- 1980’s - Iran tried to acquire nuclear technology: Germany, France, Brazil, Argentina etc, but unsuccessful. - Attempts also included uranium enrichment and heavy water reactor technology. - Some success with China and Russia, but no real access to sensitive technologies apart from laser enrichment. - Turned in mid-1980’s to nuclear black markets to get technology. BackgroundBackground contcont’’dd - Iran failed to report some of its uranium conversion activities from mid-1980’s. - Iran failed to report uranium enrichment activities from early 1990’s. -The existence of Natanz enrichment facility revealed in August 2002. WhatWhat WeWe KnowKnow Iran continues: -Uranium exploration and mining: Saghand mine and Ardakan Yellow Cake Production Plant under construction Gcchine mine producing yellowcake -Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) at Isfahan: Produced 371 tonnes UF6 since March 2004 About 35 tonnes UF6 sofar used in Natanz -Uranium Fuel Manufacturing Plant (FMP) at Isfahan:
    [Show full text]
  • SMA 1109 News.Pmd
    NON-PROFIT SMA Alumni Association U.S. POSTAGE PAID P. O. Box 958, Woodrum Station STAUNTON, VA Staunton, Virginia 24402-0958 PERMIT NO. 96 Staunton Military Academy Alumni Newsletter Published by the Staunton Military Academy Foundation • Staunton, Virginia Fourth Quarter — November 2009 Reflections of a USS NAUTILUS Skipper By Rear Admiral Jeffrey C. Metzel, Jr. (Ret), Staunton Military Academy Alumni Association P. O. Box 958, Woodrum Station, Staunton, Virginia 24402-0958 Telephone: (540) 885-1309 • Fax: (540) 885-1366 E-mail: [email protected] • Website: http://www.sma-alumni.org Make room reservations now: SMA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION, INC. MEMBERSHIP DUES Amount enclosed: $_______________ • Dues ($60.00) will be credited for fiscal year September 1, 2009 - August 31, 2010). Call the Holiday Inn Golf and • Dues are not tax deductible. Please make checks payable to: SMA Alumni Association. SMA FOUNDATION, INC. Amount enclosed: $_______________ Conference Center at • Contributions are tax deductible. Please make checks payable to SMA Foundation, Inc. • Donations are used to fund the SMA-VWIL Museum, scholarships and related expenses. (540) 248-6020 or use the SMA-VWIL INITIATIVE Amount enclosed: $_______________ USS NAUTILUS enters New York Harbor in May 1956 (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)” SMA Alumni Association • Contributions are tax deductible. Please make checks payable to SMA Foundation, Inc. Editor’s note: Admiral Jeffrey Metzel, SMA ’47, was the fourth of nine • Donations are given to VWIL for discretionary utilization. website SCHOLARSHIP FUND Amount enclosed: $_______________ Commanding Officers of the USS NAUTILUS, the world’s first nuclear powered • Contributions are tax deductible. Please make checks payable to SMA Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Nuclear Ambiguity. the Iranian Nuclear Crisis and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
    PREMIO CESARE ALFIERI CUM LAUDE – 6 – PREMIO CESARE ALFIERI CUM LAUDE Commissione giudicatrice Anno 2018 Elena Dundovich (Presidente, area storica) Emidio Diodato (area politologica) Giorgia Giovannetti (area economica) Laura Magi (area giuridica) Gabriella Paolucci (area sociologica) Michele Gerli Beyond Nuclear Ambiguity The Iranian Nuclear Crisis and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action FIRENZE UNIVERSITY PRESS 2019 Beyond Nuclear Ambiguity : the Iranian Nuclear Crisis and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action / Michele Gerli. – Firenze : Firenze University Press, 2019. (Premio Cesare Alfieri Cum Laude ; 6) http://digital.casalini.it/9788864538655 ISBN 978-88-6453-864-8 (print) ISBN 978-88-6453-865-5 (online PDF) ISBN 978-88-6453-866-2 (online EPUB) Progetto grafico di Alberto Pizarro Fernández, Pagina Maestra Immagine di copertina: © M-sur | Dreamstime.com Peer Review Process All publications are submitted to an external refereeing process under the responsibility of the FUP Editorial Board and the Scientific Committees of the individual series. The works published in the FUP catalogue are evaluated and approved by the Editorial Board of the publishing house. For a more detailed description of the refereeing process we refer to the official documents published on the website and in the online catalogue (www.fupress.com). Firenze University Press Editorial Board M. Garzaniti (Editor-in-Chief), M. Boddi, A. Bucelli, R. Casalbuoni, A. Dolfi, R. Ferrise, M.C. Grisolia, P. Guarnieri, R. Lanfredini, P. Lo Nostro, G. Mari, A. Mariani, P.M. Mariano, S. Marinai, R. Minuti, P. Nanni, G. Nigro, A. Perulli. The on-line digital edition is published in Open Access on www.fupress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • A Key Missing Piece of the Amad Puzzle
    Research memo A Key Missing Piece of the Amad Puzzle The Shahid Boroujerdi Project for Production of Uranium Metal & Nuclear Weapons Components By David Albright, Olli Heinonen, Frank Pabian, and Andrea Stricker January 11, 2019 • Documentation from the Nuclear Archives reveals a major, former nuclear weapons site under Project 110 of the Amad Plan that was not previously identified. Project 110 was charged with the development and production of nuclear warheads; • The most likely purpose of this site was as a production-scale facility to produce uranium metal components for nuclear weapons, fulfilling Iran’s long-time quest to acquire and develop uranium metallurgy and components suitable for nuclear weapon manufacturing; • Satellite imagery analysis supports these findings; • The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors should urge the IAEA to verify sites, locations, facilities, and materials involved in these activities, and urge Iran to cooperate fully in these investigations. Background Documentation seized in January 2018 by Israel from the Iranian “Nuclear Archive”1 revealed key elements of Iran’s past nuclear weaponization program and the Amad program more broadly, aimed at development and production of nuclear weapons. The material extracted from the archives2 shows that the Amad program had the 1. The authors wish to thank Behnam Ben Taleblu of FDD for his consultations on this paper. Documentation seized from Tehran contains, according to Israeli statements, some 55,000 pages and another 55,000 files on 183 CDs. Israeli officials estimated that this represented about 20 percent of the material stored at the archive. See: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Presentation, April 30, 2018, Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmSao-j7Xr4 2.
    [Show full text]