DOCSLIB.ORG

KC Shorelines Draft Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KC Shorelines Draft Analysis Report DRAFT S HORELINE A NALYSIS R EPORT FOR SHORELINES IN KLICKITAT COUNTY Prepared for: Klickitat County 228 W Main Street Goldendale, WA 98620 Prepared by: December 2016 The Watershed Company Reference Number: 121201 Cite this document as: The Watershed Company. December 2016. DRAFT Shoreline Analysis Report for Shorelines in Klickitat County. Prepared for Klickitat County, Klickitat, WA. The Watershed Company Contact Person: Dan Nickel Printed on 30% recycled paper. T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Page # Shoreline Analysis Report .............................................................. 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................. i List of Exhibits ............................................................................... iv Executive Summary ...................................................................... vii Shoreline Analysis Report .............................................................. 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Shoreline Jurisdiction .................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Shorelines of the State .................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Shorelines of Statewide Significance ............................................................ 3 1.3 Study Area ..................................................................................................... 3 2 Summary of Current Regulatory Framework .......................... 4 2.1 Shoreline Management Act .......................................................................... 4 2.2 Local Regulations ......................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Klickitat County Shoreline Master Program and Critical Areas Ordinance5 2.2.2 Other County Regulations .............................................................................. 6 2.2.3 Columbia River Gorge Commission .............................................................. 7 2.3 State Regulations .......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Tribal Regulations ....................................................................................... 10 2.5 Federal Regulations .................................................................................... 10 3 Summary of Ecosystem Conditions ...................................... 13 3.1 Geography, Topography, and Drainage Patterns ..................................... 14 3.1.1 White Salmon (WRIA 29b) ............................................................................. 14 3.1.2 Klickitat (WRIA 30) ......................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Columbia River .............................................................................................. 16 3.2 Key Species and Habitats ........................................................................... 16 3.2.1 White Salmon (WRIA 29b) ............................................................................. 20 3.2.2 Klickitat (WRIA 30) ......................................................................................... 21 i 3.2.3 Columbia River .............................................................................................. 24 3.3 Land Use and Land Use Changes .............................................................. 25 3.3.1 White Salmon (WRIA 29b) ............................................................................. 25 3.3.2 Klickitat (WRIA 30) ......................................................................................... 27 3.3.3 Columbia River .............................................................................................. 28 4 Shoreline Inventory ................................................................. 30 4.1 Inventory Sources ....................................................................................... 30 4.2 Data Assumptions and Data Gaps ............................................................. 36 4.2.1 Ecological Characterization ......................................................................... 36 4.2.2 Land Use Characterization ........................................................................... 40 4.3 Shoreline Inventory Results ....................................................................... 41 5 Analysis of Ecological Functions .......................................... 42 5.1 Approach, Rationale and Limitations of Functional Analysis .................. 42 5.1.1 Reach Delineation.......................................................................................... 42 5.1.2 Functions and Impairments .......................................................................... 45 5.1.3 Limitations ...................................................................................................... 53 5.2 Results of Functional Analysis .................................................................. 53 5.2.1 White Salmon Watershed ............................................................................. 53 5.2.2 Klickitat Watershed ....................................................................................... 69 5.2.3 Columbia River .............................................................................................. 89 5.3 Restoration Opportunities .......................................................................... 95 5.3.1 White Salmon (WRIA 29b) ............................................................................. 95 5.3.2 Klickitat (WRIA 30) ......................................................................................... 98 5.3.3 Columbia ...................................................................................................... 100 6 Land Use Analysis ................................................................ 102 6.1 Overview .................................................................................................... 102 6.2 Land Use Context: Population ................................................................. 103 6.3 County-wide Zoning and Ownership ....................................................... 104 6.4 Shoreline Permit History .......................................................................... 105 6.5 Shoreline Land Use Analysis by Area ..................................................... 105 6.5.1 Approach and Methodology ....................................................................... 106 6.5.2 White Salmon Watershed ........................................................................... 108 ii 6.5.3 Klickitat Watershed ..................................................................................... 110 6.5.4 Columbia River ............................................................................................ 113 7 Shoreline Management Recommendations ........................ 117 7.1 Environment Designations ....................................................................... 117 7.2 General Policies and Regulations ............................................................ 121 7.2.1 Archaeological and Historic Resources ................................................... 121 7.2.2 Critical Areas ................................................................................................ 121 7.2.3 Flood Hazard Reduction ............................................................................. 121 7.2.4 Public Access .............................................................................................. 122 7.2.5 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation ........................................................... 122 7.2.6 Water Quality, Stormwater, and Nonpoint Pollution ................................ 122 7.3 Shoreline Modification Provisions ........................................................... 123 7.3.1 Shoreline Stabilization ................................................................................ 123 7.3.2 Piers and Docks ........................................................................................... 123 7.3.3 Fill .................................................................................................................. 123 7.3.4 Breakwaters, Jetties, Groins and Weirs .................................................... 124 7.3.5 Dredging and Dredge Material Disposal ................................................... 124 7.3.6 Shoreline Habitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects ............ 124 7.4 Shoreline Uses .......................................................................................... 124 7.4.1 Agriculture .................................................................................................... 124 7.4.2 Aquaculture .................................................................................................. 125 7.4.3 Boating Facilities ......................................................................................... 125 7.4.4 Commercial Development .......................................................................... 125 7.4.5 Forest Practices ........................................................................................... 125 7.4.6 Industry ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 Copy 1
    Events Contact Information Map and guide to points Festivals Goldendale From the lush, heavily forested April Earth Day Celebration – Chamber of Commerce of interest in and around Goldendale 903 East Broadway west side to the golden wheat May Fiddle Around the Stars Bluegrass 509 773-3400 W O Y L country in the east, Klickitat E L www.goldendalechamber.org L E Festival – Goldendale S F E G W N O June Spring Fest – White Salmon E L County offers a diverse selection Mt. Adams G R N O H E O July Trout Lake Festival of the Arts G J Chamber of Commerce Klickitat BICKLETON CAROUSEL July Community Days – Goldendale 1 Heritage Plaza, White Salmon STONEHENGE MEMORIAL of family activities and sight ~ Presby Quilt Show 509 493-3630 seeing opportunities. ~ Show & Shine Car Show www.mtadamschamber.com COUNTY July Nights in White Salmon City of Goldendale Wine-tasting, wildlife, outdoor Art & Fusion www.cityofgoldendale.com WASHINGTON Aug Maryhill Arts Festival sports, and breathtaking Sept Huckleberry Festival – Bingen Museums scenic beauty beckon visitors Dec I’m Dreaming of a White Salmon Carousel Museum–Bickleton Holiday Festival 509 896-2007 throughout the seasons. Y E L S Open May-Oct Thurs-Sun T E J O W W E G A SON R R Rodeos Gorge Heritage Museum D PETE O L N HAE E IC Y M L G May Goldendale High School Rodeo BLUEBIRDS IN BICKLETON 509 493-3228 HISTORIC RED HOUSE - GOLDENDALE June Aldercreek Pioneer Picnic and Open May-Sept Thurs-Sun Rodeo – Cleveland Maryhill Museum of Art June Ketcham Kalf Rodeo – Glenwood 509 773-3733 Aug Klickitat County Fair and Rodeo – Open Daily Mar 15-Nov 15 Goldendale www.maryhillmuseum.org Aug Cayuse Goldendale Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Assessment of Thirty Miles of Railroad Infrastructure Along the Klickitat River and Swale Creek, Klickitat County, WA Preliminary Report
    Geomorphic Assessment of Thirty Miles of Railroad Infrastructure along the Klickitat River and Swale Creek, Klickitat County, WA Preliminary Report Prepared by: Will Conley, Hydrologist/Geomorphologist Yakama Nation Fisheries Program Klickitat Field Office Wahkiacus, WA Prepared for: United States Department of Energy Washington State Recreation and Bonneville Power Administration Conservation Office Environment, Fish, and Wildlife Program Salmon Recovery Funding Board Portland, Oregon Olympia, WA Project Number: 1997-056-00 Project Number: 10-1741 May 31, 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project funding was provided by Bonneville Power Administration project number 1997-056-00 (Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project) and Salmon Recovery Funding Board project number 10-1741. David Lindley (Habitat Biologist, YNFP) provided valuable assistance inventorying crossing structures and reviewing report drafts. The success of the field-based portion of this study was greatly assisted by coordination with Andrew Kallinen, Ranger, Columbia Hills State Park Complex. 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 7 Study Area and Geographic Scope ............................................................................................. 8 Fisheries Significance ................................................................................................................. 9 Study Purpose ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead in the White Salmon River After the Removal of Condit Dam—Planning Efforts and Recolonization Results
    FEATURE Salmon and Steelhead in the White Salmon River after the Removal of Condit Dam—Planning Efforts and Recolonization Results 190 Fisheries | Vol. 41 • No. 4 • April 2016 M. Brady Allen U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center–Columbia River Research Laboratory Rod O. Engle U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Office, Vancouver, WA Joseph S. Zendt Yakama Nation Fisheries, Klickitat, WA Frank C. Shrier PacifiCorp, Portland, OR Jeremy T. Wilson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Vancouver, WA Patrick J. Connolly U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center–Columbia River Research Laboratory, Cook, WA Current address for M. Brady Allen: Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208-3621. E-mail: [email protected] Current address for Rod O. Engle: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Office, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Suite 343, Boise, ID 83709. Fisheries | www.fisheries.org 191 Condit Dam, at river kilometer 5.3 on the White Salmon River, Washington, was breached in 2011 and completely removed in 2012. This action opened habitat to migratory fish for the first time in 100 years. The White Salmon Working Group was formed to create plans for fish salvage in preparation for fish recolonization and to prescribe the actions necessary to restore anadromous salmonid populations in the White Salmon River after Condit Dam removal. Studies conducted by work group members and others served to inform management decisions. Management options for individual species were considered, including natural recolonization, introduction of a neighboring stock, hatchery supplementation, and monitoring natural recolonization for some time period to assess the need for hatchery supplementation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES Fall, 1984 2 The Wild Cascades PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE ONCE THE LINES ARE DRAWN, THE BATTLE IS NOT OVER The North Cascades Conservation Council has developed a reputation for consistent, hard-hitting, responsible action to protect wildland resources in the Washington Cascades. It is perhaps best known for leading the fight to preserve and protect the North Cascades in the North Cascades National Park, the Pasayten and Glacier Peak Wilderness Areas, and the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. Despite the recent passage of the Washington Wilderness Act, many areas which deserve and require wilderness designation remain unprotected. One of the goals of the N3C must be to assure protection for these areas. In this issue of the Wild Cascades we have analyzed the Washington Wilderness Act to see what we won and what still hangs in the balance (page ). The N3C will continue to fight to establish new wilderness areas, but there is also a new challenge. Our expertise is increasingly being sought by government agencies to assist in developing appropriate management plans and to support them against attempts to undermine such plans. The invitation to participate more fully in management activities will require considerable effort, but it represents a challenge and an opportunity that cannot be ignored. If we are to meet this challenge we will need members who are either knowledgable or willing to learn about an issue and to guide the Board in its actions. The Spring issue of the Wild Cascades carried a center section with two requests: 1) volunteers to assist and guide the organization on various issues; and 2) payment of dues.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the MOUNT ADAMS VOLCANIC FIELD, CASCADE RANGE of SOUTHERN WASHINGTON by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-2460 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE MOUNT ADAMS VOLCANIC FIELD, CASCADE RANGE OF SOUTHERN WASHINGTON By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein When I climbed Mount Adams {17-18 August 1945] about 1950 m (6400') most of the landscape is mantled I think I found the answer to the question of why men by dense forests and huckleberry thickets. Ten radial stake everything to reach these peaks, yet obtain no glaciers and the summit icecap today cover only about visible reward for their exhaustion... Man's greatest 2.5 percent (16 km2) of the cone, but in latest Pleis­ experience-the one that brings supreme exultation­ tocene time (25-11 ka) as much as 80 percent of Mount is spiritual, not physical. It is the catching of some Adams was under ice. The volcano is drained radially vision of the universe and translating it into a poem by numerous tributaries of the Klickitat, White Salmon, or work of art ... Lewis, and Cis pus Rivers (figs. 1, 2), all of which ulti­ William 0. Douglas mately flow into the Columbia. Most of Mount Adams and a vast area west of it are Of Men and Mountains administered by the U.S. Forest Service, which has long had the dual charge of protecting the Wilderness Area and of providing a network of logging roads almost INTRODUCTION everywhere else. The northeast quadrant of the moun­ One of the dominating peaks of the Pacific North­ tain, however, lies within a part of the Yakima Indian west, Mount Adams, stands astride the Cascade crest, Reservation that is open solely to enrolled members of towering 3 km above the surrounding valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Habitat Assessment for Conservation Planning on the Lower White Salmon River, Washington
    Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Salmon habitat assessment for conservation planning on the Lower White Salmon River, Washington By Jill M. Hardiman and M. Brady Allen Report Series XXXX–XXXX U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 201x Revised and reprinted: 201x For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Author1, F.N., Author2, Firstname, 2001, Title of the publication: Place of publication (unless it is a corporate entity), Publisher, number or volume, page numbers; information on how to obtain if it’s not from the group above. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii ContentsAbstract ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 109–44 109Th Congress an Act to Designate a Portion of the White Salmon River As a Component of the National Aug
    PUBLIC LAW 109–44—AUG. 2, 2005 119 STAT. 443 Public Law 109–44 109th Congress An Act To designate a portion of the White Salmon River as a component of the National Aug. 2, 2005 Wild and Scenic Rivers System. [H.R. 38] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Upper White Salmon Wild and SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Scenic Rivers Act. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper White Salmon Wild and 16 USC 1271 Scenic Rivers Act’’. note. SEC. 2. UPPER WHITE SALMON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER. Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘( ) WHITE SALMON RIVER, WASHINGTON.—The 20 miles of river segments of the main stem of the White Salmon River and Cascade Creek, Washington, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following classifications: ‘‘(A) The approximately 1.6-mile segment of the main stem of the White Salmon River from the headwaters on Mount Adams in section 17, township 8 north, range 10 east, down- stream to the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary as a wild river. ‘‘(B) The approximately 5.1-mile segment of Cascade Creek from its headwaters on Mount Adams in section 10, township 8 north, range 10 east, downstream to the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary as a wild river. ‘‘(C) The approximately 1.5-mile segment of Cascade Creek from the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary downstream to its confluence with the White Salmon River as a scenic river.
    [Show full text]
  • Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 2342 Final Decommissioning Report
    Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 2342 Final Decommissioning Report Condit – May 2014 Prepared by: May 10, 2019 Final Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning Report This Final Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning Report has been prepared per article (J) Final Report of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order Accepting Surrender of License, Authorizing Removal of Project Facilities, and Dismissing Application for New License (“Surrender Order”) for the Condit Hydroelectric Project (Project Nos. 2342-005 and 2342-011) as issued on December 16, 2010. This report is organized to present the individual requirements of the Surrender Order of December 16, 2010 along with modifications prescribed by the Order on Rehearing, Denying Stay, and Dismissing Extension of Time Request (“Order on Rehearing”) issued by the FERC on April 21, 2011. For each requirement of these orders, actions taken by PacifiCorp and the results are described to provide a comprehensive review of the completion of all required actions, many of which have been documented in individual reports filed with the FERC. 1. BACKGROUND On October 21, 1999, PacifiCorp filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for amendment of license and approval of offer of settlement (“Surrender Application”) to surrender the Condit Hydroelectric Project (P-2342) license and decommission the project. On December 16, 2010, the FERC issued the Surrender Order. On January 14, 2011, PacifiCorp filed with the FERC a Request for Clarification and Rehearing and Motion for Stay. The FERC responded to the request issuing the Order on Rehearing on April 21, 2011. In the Surrender Order and Order on Rehearing, the FERC set forth a number of conditions that PacifiCorp was to undertake and complete to remove Condit dam and restore the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge: Its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway by IRA A
    VOLUMB 2 NUMBBI3 NOVBMBBR, 1916 . THE .MINERAL · RESOURCES OF OREGON ' PuLhaLed Monthly By The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology Mitchell Point tunnel and viaduct, Columbia River Hi~hway The .. Asenstrasse'' of America The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations Entered aa oeoond cl,... matter at Corvallis, Ore., on Feb. 10, l9lt, accordintt to tbe Act or Auc. :U, 1912. .,.,._ ;t ' OREGON BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY COMMISSION On1cm or THm Co><M188ION AND ExmBIT OREGON BUILDING, PORTLAND, OREGON Orncm or TBm DtBIICTOR CORVALLIS, OREGON .,~ 1 AMDJ WITHY COMBE, Governor HENDY M. PABKB, Director C OMMISSION ABTBUB M. SWARTLEY, Mining Engineer H. N. LAWRill:, Port.land IRA A. WILLIAMS, Geologist W. C. FELLOWS, Sumpter 1. F . REDDY, Grants Pass 1. L. WooD. Albany R. M. BIITT8, Cornucopia P. L. CAI<PBELL, Eugene W 1. KEBR. Corvallis ........ Volume 2 Number 3 ~f. November Issue {...j .· -~ of the MINERAL RESOURCES OF OREGON Published by The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology ~•, ;: · CONTAINING The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History l Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway t. By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations 1916 ILLUSTRATIONS Mitchell Point t unnel and v iaduct Beacon Rock from Columbia River (photo by Gifford & Prentiss) front cover Highway .. 72 Geologic map of Columbia river gorge. 3 Beacon Rock, near view . ....... 73 East P ortland and Mt. Hood . 1 3 Mt. Hamilton and Table mountain .. 75 Inclined volcanic ejecta, Mt. Tabor. 19 Eagle creek tuff-conglomerate west of Lava cliff along Sandy river.
    [Show full text]
  • Klickitat River Basin in South Central Washington
    BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement July 2011 DOE/EA-0424 Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOE/EIS-0424 Bonneville Power Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Bureau of Indian Affairs Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation July 2011 Abstract – Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agencies: Lead federal agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA); cooperating federal agencies: National Marine Fisheries Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs; Lead state agency: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW); cooperating tribe: Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (Yakama Nation). Title of Proposed Project: Klickitat Hatchery Complex Program State Involved: Washington Abstract: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) describes proposed changes to production programs for four anadromous fish species sponsored by the Yakama Nation and WDFW in the Klickitat river basin in south central Washington. BPA proposes to assist with funding the construction, operation, and maintenance of the programs to help mitigate for anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams. The Yakama Nation and WDFW want to produce harvestable numbers of spring and fall Chinook and coho salmon, and steelhead while achieving self- sustaining native fish populations and minimizing the effects of introduced species. The DEIS discloses the environmental effects expected from three alternatives: the No Action Alternative, the Full Master Plan Buildout Alternative, and the Klickitat Hatchery Buildout Alternative. The proposed action is to implement changes to the existing fish production programs as outlined in the Klickitat Basin Anadromous Fishery Master Plan (Yakama Nation 2008b).
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Fall Trail Notes
    Trail Notes Fall 2007 Wild and Scenic Klickitat River Klickitat Trail Conservancy P.O. Box 512 By Donna Enz Sixteen miles of the Klickitat Trail follow one of the most scenic rivers in the Columbia Lyle, WA 98635 Gorge. Its headwaters start at Mount Adams and the Goat Rocks Wilderness area [email protected] where it flows nearly 100 miles to the Columbia River. This is, of course, the Klickitat www.klickitat-trail.org River, one of the longest undammed rivers in the Pacific Northwest. A ten-mile stretch of the lower Klickitat River from the Columbia River upstream to The Mission of the Wheeler Creek, near Pitt, was added as part of the National Wild and Scenic river sys- Klickitat Trail Conservancy is to preserve tem on November 17, 1986. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was created by Congress and promote the public use of the 31 mile in 1968 to protect and preserve our nation’s free flowing rivers. Less than 1% of our Klickitat Trail as a recreational, cultural, nation’s river miles have been designated for this protection. To be considered for this natural, educational, and economic asset designation a river must possess “outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geo- of Klickitat County. logic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values". The Klickitat River is undeniably scenic. Along it’s banks it has abundant wildlife and Members strongly support the purposes, wonderful wildflower viewing in the spring. It is also bird-rich, making bird watching very goals, and objectives of the Klickitat Trail popular.
    [Show full text]