DOCSLIB.ORG

VOLUME II Subbasin Plans VOLUME II SUBBASIN PLANS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VOLUME II Subbasin Plans VOLUME II SUBBASIN PLANS United States The Columbia River Anadromous Fish Restoration Plan of the Nez Perce, Umatilla, Warm Springs and Yakama Tribes Canada United States VOLUME II Subbasin Plans VOLUME II SUBBASIN PLANS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction2 Map of Subbasins5 Subbasin Plans Lower Columbia River Mainstem6 Wind River 9 Little White Salmon13 Big White Salmon 16 Hood River20 Klickitat River22 Fifteenmile Creek27 Deschutes River29 John Day River32 Umatilla River35 Mid-Columbia River Mainstem40 Walla Walla River44 Yakima River47 Wenatchee River53 Entiat River59 Methow River64 Okanogan River70 Snake River Mainstem76 Tucannon River79 Clearwater River82 Grande Ronde River89 Salmon River 94 Imnaha River101 Summary Tables Acronyms104 Glossary105 References109 1 INTRODUCTION Klickitat, Yakima, Imnaha, Umatilla, Walla The NPPC was created under the Northwest Power Walla—many of the tributaries of the Columbia Act of 1980 to protect, mitigate and enhance Basin retain the names of the people who inhabited salmon in the basin. After determining the magni- their banks and fished their waters for no less than tude of salmon losses, the NPPC adopted a Fish ten thousand years. Even those rivers renamed by and Wildlife Program amendment setting forth a white settlers remain within the territories where program to restore salmon through individual tribu- our ancestors, the people of the Umatilla, Nez tary plans (subbasin planning) with implementation Perce, Yakama, and Warm Springs tribes lived and slated for 1990. died since time immemorial. The Pacific Salmon Commission was created in Prior to treaty signing in 1855, our Indian people 1985 under the Pacific Salmon Treaty to rebuild traveled throughout our territories in the Columbia chinook salmon runs and allocate harvests between Basin to places where we knew fish and game were United States and Canadian fisheries. available for sustenance and livelihood. In the The Columbia River Fish Management Plan was treaties, which opened the basin to white settle- approved by the Federal District Court of Oregon in ment, we reserved the right to travel to all of these 1988 to address production and harvest issues usual and accustomed fishing places to take fish among the federal, state, and tribal governments. while also reserving the exclusive right to take fish Provisions included the development of subbasin on our reservations. For its part, the United States plans to achieve the earliest feasible rebuilding of agreed to secure these rights. basin salmon stocks. For almost a century following the treaty councils, In 1991 the National Marine Fisheries Service list- federal policy generally ignored the treaties by ed certain Snake River salmon stocks as threatened allowing the salmon populations of the basin to or endangered, shifting attention to the preservation decline through over harvest and upper basin devel- of fragmented and isolated populations in the Snake opment and by misusing mitigation authorities such River, its tributaries and Redfish Lake. During the as the Mitchell Act and the Lower Snake River Salmon Summit, a series of citizen/industry/gov- Compensation Plan in a discriminatory manner. But ernment meetings convened in the early 1990s to in 1968, with the initiation of the lawsuit now called confront the salmon crisis, key participants rejected U.S. v. Oregon, we acted to protect our birthright. the approach that included subbasin restoration pro- Twenty-seven years later, U.S. v. Oregon is still on grams in favor of a focus on Endangered Species the federal district court docket and provides a Act listings. means of dispute resolution when discussion and The NMFS listing also restricted the ability of fish- negotiations fail between our tribes, the United ery managers to use propagation as a tool for States, and the states of Oregon, Idaho and rebuilding by including the “evolutionarily signifi- Washington. cant unit” (ESU) policy, a severe restriction on the Since 1968, the federal, state and tribal govern- ability of fishery managers to utilize propagation ments created or used other institutions to address techniques that were included as elements of the the problem of declining salmon stocks. These subbasin plans and the Columbia River Fish included the Northwest Power Planning Council Management Plan. (NPPC), the Pacific Salmon Commission, the Regrettably, the ESA designation of Snake River Columbia River Fish Management Plan adopted by salmon set back efforts to restore the basin’s declin- the federal court in U.S. v. Oregon, and the consul- ing salmon populations throughout the basin— tations conducted by the National Marine Fisheries efforts that were mandated under U.S. v. Oregon, Service (NMFS) under the Endangered Species Act the Pacific Salmon Treaty and the NPPC’s Fish and (ESA). Wildlife Program. However, scientific research 2 indicates now that numerous non-listed populations in Volume I of Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit, offer will be lost unless protection and restoration efforts the best scientific knowledge available on the use are begun immediately in every Columbia Basin of habitat protection and fish restoration in each tributary. watershed. Further, the plans are based upon a thor- ough technical evaluation of habitat conditions and Since the passage of the Northwest Power Act in proper broodstock sources for supplementation 1980, the basin’s treaty fishing tribes have worked where appropriate. with their neighbors in certain watersheds to restore fisheries for the benefit and enjoyment of all users. But they are not cast in concrete. Instead the plans that follow are intended to engage our neighbors in In the Umatilla, the Confederated Tribes of the the challenge of salmon restoration through cooper- Umatilla Indian Reservation, in cooperation with ative efforts at the watershed and regional level. the State of Oregon and local irrigators, implement- Such cooperative efforts guiding state and federal ed a program of habitat improvement and outplant- government actions are preferable to mandated pro- ing of appropriate stocks that returned chinook grams arising from lawsuits and court orders or salmon and coho to the river for the first time in from state capitals and national offices in seventy years. Washington, D.C. In the Imnaha, a tributary of the Snake, the Nez Federal, state and tribal governments each have a Perce Tribe worked with Wallowa County residents role to play in Columbia Basin salmon restoration to maintain a program for habitat protection and based upon each sovereign’s specific authorities and artificial propagation that, in 1992 and 1993, functions. Through the U.S. v. Oregon process, the resulted in a ten-fold increase in adult spring chi- three classes of sovereign governments learned to nook returns, then the only increasing trend for resolve disputes by defining and answering technical spring chinook in the Snake above eight dams. questions in a manner that provided a firm basis on In the Yakima, the Yakama Indian Nation secured which policy representatives could then find solu- federal legislation to provide enhancement of water tions. We believe these same methods can be applied quantity as a means to implement an ambitious pro- at both the regional and watershed levels so that gram of salmon restoration that has been in the restoration proceeds on a cooperative basis, thereby NPPC’s Fish and Wildlife Program since 1982. avoiding mandated solutions from one government In the Hood River, the Confederated Tribes of the or another. Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon are working The watersheds of the basin are both the biological closely with the Oregon Department of Fish and and social neighborhoods in which we live. During Wildlife and with local interests to rebuild spring the next twelve months, we call upon the stake- chinook and steelhead through a program of habitat holders of each watershed to comment upon these improvement and supplementation of natural pro- proposals and meet with us in a spirit of neighborly duction. cooperation to address salmon restoration. The plans that follow are our tribal proposals to pro- Institutions such as local governments, municipal tect or restore salmon populations in each tributary and public utility districts, schools and irrigation above Bonneville Dam through the implementation districts are key players in this effort and their of detailed subbasin actions that address both habi- review is especially important. tat protection and fish production. These subbasin We call upon state and federal government agencies plans are a refinement of the plans completed by the to assist this effort by supplying technical and fishery agencies and tribes in 1990—plans that financial resources and by constructively participat- defined watershed habitat and production problems ing, along with tribal representatives, in watershed and proposed remedies. They represent the cultur- approaches. Certain activities are already under al and geographic knowledge of our tribes and, in way: Oregon, Idaho and Washington are undertak- combination with the life cycle survival frame- ing various watershed health initiatives under state work, scientific hypotheses and recommendations authorities. In its most recent Fish and Wildlife 3 Program amendments, the NPPC, whose members development policies. For the Sake of the Salmon, a are appointed by state governors, called for BPA to cooperative state, federal, tribal project, is an impor- fund and fish managers to develop emergency pro- tant coastwide Pacific salmon restoration initiative. duction and habitat actions to protect adult spawn- We are calling for a moratorium on salmon postur- ers in 1995 and 1996. The four Columbia River ing and an end to the impasse that has marked tribes and the Shoshone Bannock tribe together salmon restoration since the listing of Snake River with the Earth Conservation Corps and the U.S. stocks in 1991. From the tribal perspective, the Department of Energy are putting young people to progress that marked salmon rebuilding efforts that work fencing off riparian habitat, restoring stream- began in the mid- 1970s was halted as interests sus- bank vegetation and related projects as a part of pended constructive dialogue.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Salmon and Steelhead in the White Salmon River After the Removal of Condit Dam—Planning Efforts and Recolonization Results
    FEATURE Salmon and Steelhead in the White Salmon River after the Removal of Condit Dam—Planning Efforts and Recolonization Results 190 Fisheries | Vol. 41 • No. 4 • April 2016 M. Brady Allen U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center–Columbia River Research Laboratory Rod O. Engle U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Office, Vancouver, WA Joseph S. Zendt Yakama Nation Fisheries, Klickitat, WA Frank C. Shrier PacifiCorp, Portland, OR Jeremy T. Wilson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Vancouver, WA Patrick J. Connolly U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center–Columbia River Research Laboratory, Cook, WA Current address for M. Brady Allen: Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208-3621. E-mail: [email protected] Current address for Rod O. Engle: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Office, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Suite 343, Boise, ID 83709. Fisheries | www.fisheries.org 191 Condit Dam, at river kilometer 5.3 on the White Salmon River, Washington, was breached in 2011 and completely removed in 2012. This action opened habitat to migratory fish for the first time in 100 years. The White Salmon Working Group was formed to create plans for fish salvage in preparation for fish recolonization and to prescribe the actions necessary to restore anadromous salmonid populations in the White Salmon River after Condit Dam removal. Studies conducted by work group members and others served to inform management decisions. Management options for individual species were considered, including natural recolonization, introduction of a neighboring stock, hatchery supplementation, and monitoring natural recolonization for some time period to assess the need for hatchery supplementation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES Fall, 1984 2 The Wild Cascades PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE ONCE THE LINES ARE DRAWN, THE BATTLE IS NOT OVER The North Cascades Conservation Council has developed a reputation for consistent, hard-hitting, responsible action to protect wildland resources in the Washington Cascades. It is perhaps best known for leading the fight to preserve and protect the North Cascades in the North Cascades National Park, the Pasayten and Glacier Peak Wilderness Areas, and the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. Despite the recent passage of the Washington Wilderness Act, many areas which deserve and require wilderness designation remain unprotected. One of the goals of the N3C must be to assure protection for these areas. In this issue of the Wild Cascades we have analyzed the Washington Wilderness Act to see what we won and what still hangs in the balance (page ). The N3C will continue to fight to establish new wilderness areas, but there is also a new challenge. Our expertise is increasingly being sought by government agencies to assist in developing appropriate management plans and to support them against attempts to undermine such plans. The invitation to participate more fully in management activities will require considerable effort, but it represents a challenge and an opportunity that cannot be ignored. If we are to meet this challenge we will need members who are either knowledgable or willing to learn about an issue and to guide the Board in its actions. The Spring issue of the Wild Cascades carried a center section with two requests: 1) volunteers to assist and guide the organization on various issues; and 2) payment of dues.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the MOUNT ADAMS VOLCANIC FIELD, CASCADE RANGE of SOUTHERN WASHINGTON by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-2460 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE MOUNT ADAMS VOLCANIC FIELD, CASCADE RANGE OF SOUTHERN WASHINGTON By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein When I climbed Mount Adams {17-18 August 1945] about 1950 m (6400') most of the landscape is mantled I think I found the answer to the question of why men by dense forests and huckleberry thickets. Ten radial stake everything to reach these peaks, yet obtain no glaciers and the summit icecap today cover only about visible reward for their exhaustion... Man's greatest 2.5 percent (16 km2) of the cone, but in latest Pleis­ experience-the one that brings supreme exultation­ tocene time (25-11 ka) as much as 80 percent of Mount is spiritual, not physical. It is the catching of some Adams was under ice. The volcano is drained radially vision of the universe and translating it into a poem by numerous tributaries of the Klickitat, White Salmon, or work of art ... Lewis, and Cis pus Rivers (figs. 1, 2), all of which ulti­ William 0. Douglas mately flow into the Columbia. Most of Mount Adams and a vast area west of it are Of Men and Mountains administered by the U.S. Forest Service, which has long had the dual charge of protecting the Wilderness Area and of providing a network of logging roads almost INTRODUCTION everywhere else. The northeast quadrant of the moun­ One of the dominating peaks of the Pacific North­ tain, however, lies within a part of the Yakima Indian west, Mount Adams, stands astride the Cascade crest, Reservation that is open solely to enrolled members of towering 3 km above the surrounding valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Habitat Assessment for Conservation Planning on the Lower White Salmon River, Washington
    Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Salmon habitat assessment for conservation planning on the Lower White Salmon River, Washington By Jill M. Hardiman and M. Brady Allen Report Series XXXX–XXXX U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 201x Revised and reprinted: 201x For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Author1, F.N., Author2, Firstname, 2001, Title of the publication: Place of publication (unless it is a corporate entity), Publisher, number or volume, page numbers; information on how to obtain if it’s not from the group above. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii ContentsAbstract ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 109–44 109Th Congress an Act to Designate a Portion of the White Salmon River As a Component of the National Aug
    PUBLIC LAW 109–44—AUG. 2, 2005 119 STAT. 443 Public Law 109–44 109th Congress An Act To designate a portion of the White Salmon River as a component of the National Aug. 2, 2005 Wild and Scenic Rivers System. [H.R. 38] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Upper White Salmon Wild and SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Scenic Rivers Act. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper White Salmon Wild and 16 USC 1271 Scenic Rivers Act’’. note. SEC. 2. UPPER WHITE SALMON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER. Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘( ) WHITE SALMON RIVER, WASHINGTON.—The 20 miles of river segments of the main stem of the White Salmon River and Cascade Creek, Washington, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following classifications: ‘‘(A) The approximately 1.6-mile segment of the main stem of the White Salmon River from the headwaters on Mount Adams in section 17, township 8 north, range 10 east, down- stream to the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary as a wild river. ‘‘(B) The approximately 5.1-mile segment of Cascade Creek from its headwaters on Mount Adams in section 10, township 8 north, range 10 east, downstream to the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary as a wild river. ‘‘(C) The approximately 1.5-mile segment of Cascade Creek from the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary downstream to its confluence with the White Salmon River as a scenic river.
    [Show full text]
  • Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 2342 Final Decommissioning Report
    Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 2342 Final Decommissioning Report Condit – May 2014 Prepared by: May 10, 2019 Final Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning Report This Final Condit Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning Report has been prepared per article (J) Final Report of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order Accepting Surrender of License, Authorizing Removal of Project Facilities, and Dismissing Application for New License (“Surrender Order”) for the Condit Hydroelectric Project (Project Nos. 2342-005 and 2342-011) as issued on December 16, 2010. This report is organized to present the individual requirements of the Surrender Order of December 16, 2010 along with modifications prescribed by the Order on Rehearing, Denying Stay, and Dismissing Extension of Time Request (“Order on Rehearing”) issued by the FERC on April 21, 2011. For each requirement of these orders, actions taken by PacifiCorp and the results are described to provide a comprehensive review of the completion of all required actions, many of which have been documented in individual reports filed with the FERC. 1. BACKGROUND On October 21, 1999, PacifiCorp filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for amendment of license and approval of offer of settlement (“Surrender Application”) to surrender the Condit Hydroelectric Project (P-2342) license and decommission the project. On December 16, 2010, the FERC issued the Surrender Order. On January 14, 2011, PacifiCorp filed with the FERC a Request for Clarification and Rehearing and Motion for Stay. The FERC responded to the request issuing the Order on Rehearing on April 21, 2011. In the Surrender Order and Order on Rehearing, the FERC set forth a number of conditions that PacifiCorp was to undertake and complete to remove Condit dam and restore the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge: Its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway by IRA A
    VOLUMB 2 NUMBBI3 NOVBMBBR, 1916 . THE .MINERAL · RESOURCES OF OREGON ' PuLhaLed Monthly By The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology Mitchell Point tunnel and viaduct, Columbia River Hi~hway The .. Asenstrasse'' of America The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations Entered aa oeoond cl,... matter at Corvallis, Ore., on Feb. 10, l9lt, accordintt to tbe Act or Auc. :U, 1912. .,.,._ ;t ' OREGON BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY COMMISSION On1cm or THm Co><M188ION AND ExmBIT OREGON BUILDING, PORTLAND, OREGON Orncm or TBm DtBIICTOR CORVALLIS, OREGON .,~ 1 AMDJ WITHY COMBE, Governor HENDY M. PABKB, Director C OMMISSION ABTBUB M. SWARTLEY, Mining Engineer H. N. LAWRill:, Port.land IRA A. WILLIAMS, Geologist W. C. FELLOWS, Sumpter 1. F . REDDY, Grants Pass 1. L. WooD. Albany R. M. BIITT8, Cornucopia P. L. CAI<PBELL, Eugene W 1. KEBR. Corvallis ........ Volume 2 Number 3 ~f. November Issue {...j .· -~ of the MINERAL RESOURCES OF OREGON Published by The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology ~•, ;: · CONTAINING The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History l Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway t. By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations 1916 ILLUSTRATIONS Mitchell Point t unnel and v iaduct Beacon Rock from Columbia River (photo by Gifford & Prentiss) front cover Highway .. 72 Geologic map of Columbia river gorge. 3 Beacon Rock, near view . ....... 73 East P ortland and Mt. Hood . 1 3 Mt. Hamilton and Table mountain .. 75 Inclined volcanic ejecta, Mt. Tabor. 19 Eagle creek tuff-conglomerate west of Lava cliff along Sandy river.
    [Show full text]
  • Condit Dam Removal Sepa Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
    Condit Dam Removal Final SEPA Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) Ecology Publication # 07-06-012 March 23, 2007 CONDIT DAM REMOVAL SEPA SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT This report is available on the Department of Ecology Web site at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0706012.html For a CD or printed copy of this report contact: Joanne R. Wellner Department of Ecology 15 West Yakima Avenue, Suite 200 Yakima WA 98902 Phone (509) 575-2680 Refer to Publication number 07-06-012 If you need this publication in an alternate format, please contact Tim Schlender in Ecology’s Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program at (360) 407-6096. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call (877) 833-6341. THIS DOCUMENT WAS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER March 23, 2007 Dear interested parties: The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) has prepared and issued this State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to address the proposal by PacifiCorp to remove the Condit Hydroelectric Project on the White Salmon River, a tributary of the Columbia River. The Final SEIS supplements the following National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents: Condit Hydroelectric Project Final Environmental Impact Statement, FERC No. 2342-005, Washington (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, October 1996); and Final Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement, Condit Hydroelectric Project, Washington, FERC Project No. 2342, (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, June 2002). As part of the SEIS, Ecology is adopting these documents pursuant to provisions of WAC 197-11-610 and 630. The aforementioned documents identify and evaluate a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposal, identify probable significant impacts associated with the proposal and its alternatives, and address mitigation measures to be imposed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 White Salmon River
    WASHINGTON #5 White Salmon River T HREAT: CONDIT D AM SUMMARY turing steep, breathtaking canyons and contin- There is incredible potential for the White uous rapids, the White Salmon is nationally Salmon River to once again be home to abun- recognized as a premier whitewater destina- dant wild salmon and steelhead runs. But tion. Ten outfitters run commercial trips on before this vision can be realized, the 94 year- the river, and at least 25,000 boaters use the KEEFE ’ O old Condit Dam, which blocks all salmon and White Salmon each year, bringing an important steelhead from most of the river, must be economic influx to the local community. THOMAS removed. Not only is dam removal the best Before Condit Dam was built, the White choice for the river ecosystem, it also makes Salmon River was home to abundant runs of economic sense. The time for action is now: salmon and steelhead that provided an impor- the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission tant source of food, as well as spiritual and cul- (FERC) must issue a dam removal order that tural values to the Native Americans of the respects a carefully negotiated multi-party set- area. tlement agreement calling for dam removal in 2008. This is an extraordinary restoration THE THREAT opportunity we simply cannot afford to miss. Built in 1913 to generate hydropower, Condit Dam played an important role in the history THE RIVER and development of the area. But the benefits From the snowy slopes of Mount Adams in have come with a high cost to the river’s southwest Washington, the White Salmon integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Trout Lake NAP
    W ASHINGTON STATE NATURAL AREA PRESERVE [NAP] | ESTABLISHED 1996 Welcome to Trout Lake NAP Exceptional Places DID YOU KNOW? Wetlands are among the most Quality examples of Washington’s native his nationally recognized, biologically productive systems in grasslands, woodlands, marshes and more are the world, similar to rain forests protected in Natural Areas managed by the high quality wetland is home in the diversity of species Department of Natural Resources (DNR). to hundreds of plant species, they support. These special sites offer opportunities for research more than 160 species of birds, and the and education. Some have interpretive or W recreation trails. Others require DNR permission to h i rare Oregon Spotted Frog. t e visit because features are sensitive to human S a l m o disturbance. The preserve protects all of those n Chopaka Mountain R Lake Lumni Loomis Island Louise B i Point Doughty Dailey Prairie v Cypress Island u Barker Mountain Cypress Highlands Olivine Bridge . Seasonal e Hat Island Little c Cattle Point Skagit Riverside Breaks Pend Bald Granite Oreille r d things and provides opportunities for Water Level k Eagle Lakes River R C Shipwreck Davis Canyon Fluctuates– s Point Methow r Mount Morning Rapids m Pilchuck Star T e Dabob Bay r Often as Much Greider a o e Ridge u Devil’s Lake Castle Spring d South Nolan Rock Creek Pinecroft as 4 feet. k Canyon t Clearwater Corridor Snoqualmie Bog Entiat The 2 Clearwater Kitsap Forest Slopes education and research. There is a A Kings Lake Bog Steppe L R Bogs Dishman Schumocher Mount Si Hills Oak Patch Upper a .
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Gorge Be Arranged by Calling (509) 427-5208
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ridgefield National Pierce National Wildlife Refuge consists of 336 acres of Wildlife Refuge river bottomland habitat with riparian areas, wetlands, grasslands and hardwoods. The refuge provides habitat Complex for Canada geese, a variety of waterfowl and numerous Columbia River P.O. Box 457 other wildlife species. Hardy Creek supports one of the 301 North Third Street last remaining chum salmon runs in the lower Columbia Ridgefield WA 98642 River drainage. The refuge can be viewed from the Gorge (360) 887-4106 Beacon Rock trail. Location: South of State Highway 14 between Beacon Three of the four National Wildlife Refuges located on National Fish Rock State Park and North Bonneville. Group tours can the Washington side of the Columbia River Gorge be arranged by calling (509) 427-5208. National Scenic Area are currently closed to the public. Hatcheries and Public use facilities are planned for each of these Conboy Lake National Wildlife Refuge, a large seasonal refuges and will be developed as funding permits. The National Wildlife marsh at the base of 12,307-foot Mount Adams, is a major fourth refuge in the complex, Conboy Lake, has a self- stopover for migrating Canada geese, tundra swans, and guided trail and visitor facility. Group tours may be many species of ducks, and the only known nesting Refuges accommodated at each refuge as time allows. Contact location for sandhill cranes in Washington. The best time the refuge managers for additional information. to see geese, swans, and ducks is in early spring when visitors are also treated to a beautiful display of Steigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge consists of wildflowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Trout Proposed Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat Is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy
    BULL TROUT PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT JUSTIFICATION: RATIONALE FOR WHY HABITAT IS ESSENTIAL, AND DOCUMENTATION OF OCCUPANCY U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, Boise, Idaho Pacific Region, Portland, Oregon November 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 METHOD FOR DETERMINING CRITICAL HABITAT ............................................................ 1 SIX RECOVERY UNITS ARE ESSENTIAL ............................................................................... 2 A. Coastal Recovery Unit ........................................................................................................ 4 B. Klamath Recovery Unit ...................................................................................................... 4 C. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit ............................................................................................ 4 D. Upper Snake Recovery Unit ............................................................................................... 5 E. Columbia Headwaters Recovery Unit ................................................................................ 5 F. Saint Mary Recovery Unit .................................................................................................. 5 SEVEN GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR BULL TROUT CONSERVATION ............................... 5 Four Biological Indicators ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]