Safety Management System in Aviation: Comparative Analysis of Safety Management System Approaches in V4 Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safety Management System in Aviation: Comparative Analysis of Safety Management System Approaches in V4 Countries Management Systems in 2021, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp. 208-214 Production Engineering Date of submission of the article to the Editor: 01/2021 Date of acceptance of the article by the Editor: 03/2021 DOI 10.2478/mspe-2021-0026 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN AVIATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APPROACHES IN V4 COUNTRIES Michaela KEŠEĽOVÁ, Monika BLIŠŤANOVÁ, Peter HANÁK, Ľubomíra BRŮNOVÁ Technical University of Kosice Abstract: The article aims to support the Safety Management System's implementation in the Visegrad Four (V4) countries by introducing supporting documentation at the national level or national legislation. The research subjects are the V4 countries (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia), where 39 air carriers operate. Safety manage- ment in today's world is already necessary, yet introducing a Safety Management System (SMS) is voluntary in many areas, including some transport modes. In air transport, it is mandatory, and the general principles and guidelines of this system are set out in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which has issued sev- eral regulations and recommendations. The lists of ICAO standards and essential translations can be considered a minimum, which is also approached by different authorities. The article points out the primary differences in SMS in individual V4 countries and presents which country provides the strongest support in implementing this system. Key words: ICAO, Regulations and Recommendations, Safety Management System INTRODUCTION In November 2006, the International Civil Aviation Organ- Air transport has become an integral part of life with a ization (ICAO) demanded the Contracting States establish growing trend, but in 2020 the COVID world pandemic a safety program to accept and oversee the safety service stopped its expansion. Despite the fact, International Air providers' safety management system. Recently, the Transport Association (IATA) published a scenario analysis emerging era of the 'Total Aviation System Approach' re- that over the next 20 years, global air passenger growth quires all aviation stakeholders and their interfaces to be could plausibly be in the range between 3.2% and 5.3% understood and managed for safety performance, result- [1]. With the increase in aviation accidents and incidents ing from an increasing level of maturity in aviation safety and environmental threats, aviation safety came to the [5, 29]. From the first point of view, the purpose of safety forefront of interest. The main reason was that aviation management is to make sure that the amount of accidents safety is a critical factor in passenger trust of an airline, and incidents is kept as low as possible or as low as is rea- reputation, and international prestige. According to [2], sonably practicable. From a second perspective, the pur- aviation safety determines the state in which risks con- pose of safety management is to ensure that as much as nected with aviation activities, linked to, or indirect sup- possible goes right, in the sense that everyday work port of aircraft operation, are reduced and controlled to achieves its objectives [6, 26, 30]. an acceptable level. Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 trans- poses international standards and recommended prac- LITERATURE REVIEW tices described in Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention on A Safety Management System (SMS) provides a frame- International Civil Aviation. It sets out an obligation for work of methodologies, requirements, and tools that sup- each Member State of the European Union to establish an port and organisations in understanding safety principles, independent permanent national civil aviation safety in- constructing and customising a management framework vestigation authority, which shall investigate accidents that is ideal for achieving each organisation's necessary and serious incidents to improve aviation safety and pre- safety outcomes. Although safety management was a pri- vent future occurrences without apportioning blame lia- ority used as a tool to improve occupational health and bility [3, 4]. safety, it has emerged into a much more comprehensive M. KEŠEĽOVÁ et al. – Safety Management System in Aviation… 209 system embracing psychological, organisational, social, as a quality management system is a systematic and ex- and technological approaches to safety and systems plicit approach to improving the quality of a product to thinking [7, 28]. Another definition describes a safety meet the customer's requirement [16]. This sophisticated management system as an approach to harmonise, ra- and high-quality system has broad applicability in air tionalise, and integrate management processes, safety transport. It is also one of the main requirements [17] that culture, and operational risk assessment [8]. Modern SMS an air carrier must meet to obtain an Aircraft Operating could be defined as an arbitrary collection of activities Certificate (AOC). A specific modification of the require- deemed necessary actions to discharge responsibilities ment is Commission Regulation (EU) No. 965/2012. It is a under the new age of the delegated responsibility of self- comprehensive regulation laying down general and de- regulation [9]. The definitions of SMS in air transport vary tailed air operations rules, including SMS, airborne vehi- depending on the system's approach, the main definitions cles, aeroplanes, helicopters, balloons, and gliders. being given in (Table 1). The safety management system for 193 ICAO member countries is regulated by ICAO Annex 19, first published in Table 1 July 2013. ICAO Annex 19 provides standards for imple- Definitions of SMS menting and maintaining a State Safety Program (SSP) by SOURCE DEFINITION States and providing a Safety Management System (SMS) A safety management system is a system- by applicable service providers involved in the various ser- atic approach to managing safety, includ- vices and industries in aviation [18]. Table 2 shows the ICAO ing the necessary organisational struc- Overview of Annex 19. tures, accountabilities, policies, and proce- dures [5]. A Safety Management System is an ex- Table 2 plicit, comprehensive, and proactive Overview of Annex 19 process for managing risks that inte- Overview of Annex 19 Transport Canada grates operations and technical systems emphasises the importance of security management at the na- (TC) with financial and human resource man- tional level; agement for all activities related to a increases safety by consolidating safety management provisions Civil Aviation Document (CAD) [10]. applicable to several areas of aviation; A safety management system is a system- facilitates the development of safety management provisions; atic approach to managing safety, includ- represents an opportunity further to support the implementa- Civil Aviation Safety ing organisational structures, accountabil- tion of the SMS and SSP provisions; Authority Australia ities, policies, and procedures. An SMS is Supports the process set out for the analysis of Annex 19 feed- (CASA) scalable, so it can be tailored to the size back and the implementation of safety management. and complexity of the organisation [11]. A Safety Management System is the for- ICAO Annex 19 are supplemented by [18]: mal, top-down, organisation-wide ap- − Safety Management Manual (ICAO) for Safety (Doc Federal Aviation proach to managing safety risk and assur- 9859), Administration ing the effectiveness of safety risk con- − Guidance Material (GM) to Annex III Organization re- (FAA) trols. It includes systematic procedures, quirements for air operations, in this case, practices, and policies for the manage- ment of safety risk [12]. ORO.GEN.200, A Safety Management System is a system- with recommendations for other manuals [18]: atic and proactive approach to managing − Manual for the Oversight of Fatigue Management Ap- safety risks. Risk management activities proaches (Doc 9966) are at the heart of SMS, including the iden- UK (Civil Aviation − Manual on Laser Emitters and Flight Safety (Doc 9815) tification of safety issues, risk assessments Authority) CAA − Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) and risk mitigation. It is supported by a (Doc 10019) strong assurance function that monitors compliance and performance as well as − Manual on the Competencies of Civil Aviation Safety managing changes [13]. Inspectors (Doc 10070) − Manual on the ICAO Bird Strike Information System The SMS is a system whose primary purpose is to ensure (IBIS) (Doc 9332) that safety is managed and regulated in all aspects of life. − Airport Services Manual (Doc 9137), Part 3 – Bird Con- To maintain the required safety level, the effective identi- trol and Reduction fication of all risks is a precautionary measure [14]. The − Air Traffic Services Planning Manual (Doc 9426) safety management framework has gradually evolved into − Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9760) a core subject for safety sciences since 1973 [15]. An SMS − Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) (Doc 10004) is generally defined as the processes, components, and − Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation management activities that seek to enhance an organisa- (Doc 9756) tion's safety efficiency [9]. This system is no more than a The ICAO Safety Management Manual (SMM) [5] has un- systematic and explicit approach to managing safety – just dergone four revisions, the last of which was in 2018. The 210 Management Systems in Production Engineering 2021, Volume 29, Issue 3 current edition is supplemented
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    The Coordinator´s Activity Report Season : S12 Period : 25th March 2012 - 27th October 2012 Performed by: Slot Coordination Czech Republic Slot Coordination Czech Republic - 1 - Table of contents: 1. Introduction General information and general comments regarding the coordination process 2. Coordination Parameters A) Reference season a) Runway b) Terminal c) Others B) Forthcoming season a) Runway b) Terminal c) Others 3. Additional parameters a) Curfew b) Allotment for PSO c) Allotment for GA/BA d) Local rules 4. Coordination Process A) Initial allocation (IA) a) Requested slots - Historic - New entrant - Re-timed - New incumbent b) Allocated slots - Historic - New entrant - Re-timed - New incumbent i) As requested ii) Offers iii) Reason for not satisfying c) Outstanding requests d) Slot pool - Before initial allocation - After initial allocation B) Slot Return Deadline (SRD) a) Allocated slots b) Slot pool C) End of Season (EoS) a) Allocated slots incl. GA/BA D) Graphics / Histograms - Initial Allocation - SRD - Compare - Main carriers • Capacity • Demand • Allocated Slot Coordination Czech Republic - 2 - 5. Slot mobility a) transfers/exchanges 6. Monitoring Report a) Slot misuse b) Late handback c) Sanctions d) Exemptions 14.1 7. Coordination Committee a) minutes b) constitution 8. Conclusions Slot Coordination Czech Republic - 3 - 1. Introduction This report contains the general total data for S12 season. Time UTC. This report refers to Prague Ruzyne / Václav Havel Airport Prague. It is Level 3 airport, IATA/ICAO: PRG/LKPR The coordination software used: Score, ver. 5.10.10.4. Since November 2011 the online coordination has been performed. The coordination process is conducted in full compliance with EU Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Routes: How You Can Influence Their Development Paul Ouimet
    strategic transportation & tourism solutions Session ME302 Airline Routes: How You Can Influence Their Development Paul Ouimet 49th ICCA Congress & Exhibition October 25, 2010 Presentation Outline 1. What airlines are looking for… 2. Implementing an Air Service Development program… 3. What you can do to attract new services… 2 Global Air Passenger Traffic Millions Financial Credit IATA Crisis, Global forecasts Recession 7.1% 9/11, & H1N1 Outbreak Economic increase Downturn in 2010 Asian & SARS Economic outbreak Gulf War Flu and Recession Source: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and International Air Transport Association (IATA). Global Air Passengers by Sector Total Passengers Millions 34% 24% 66% 76% Source: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Airline Financial Performance Global Air Carriers Operating Profit/Loss US$ (millions) Source: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and International Air Transport Association (IATA). Global Air Traffic and Capacity % Change Source: International Air Transport Association (IATA). Consolidation: Mergers & Failures Gol Lufthansa EasyJet KLM Varig Swiss Air France go Martinair Austrian KLM dba SkyBus Brussels Air Canada Oasis Hong Kong Delta Canadian US Airways Northwest America West Silverjet ATA Ryanair Southwest AirTran XL Airways MaxJet buzz Zoom FlyLAL United Continental Aviacsa Sterling EOS MyAir SkyEurope Aloha Centralwings Nationwide 7 Growth of Low Cost Carriers 8 Growth of Low Cost Carriers LCC Capacity Share by Region (YTD Aug-2009) 9 strategic transportation & tourism solutions What airlines are looking for… The Airline Reality . Airline planners require detailed, accurate information to make new route decisions . But airlines do not have the resources to fully evaluate every market – Legacy carriers have scaled back staff – LCCs face innumerable expansion opportunities .
    [Show full text]
  • Airport from Katowice
    Katowice International Katowice International Airport (Polish: Międzynarodowy Port Lotniczy Katowice) (IATA: KTW, ICAO: EPKT) is an international airport, located in Pyrzowice, 30 km (19 mi) north of Katowice, Poland. The airport has the fourth- biggest (second-biggest in Summer Season) passenger flow in Poland. Katowice Airport has the biggest charter passenger flow of the airports in Poland. In August 2017 this airport was the second biggest airport in Poland in passenger flow. It is also second biggest airport in the Country in Cargo traffic. Katowice Airport operates a lot of charter, regular and cargo flights. The airport is an operating base for Enter Air, Ryanair Sun, Small Planet Airlines, Smartwings, Travel Service Polska and Wizz Air. History The current location of Katowice International Airport was initially used by German soldiers. In 1940, the Luftwaffe began construction of an airbase in the meadows around Pyrzowice. The Germans built three stone and concrete airstrips, with runway lengths varying from 1000 to 1500 meters, all of which around 50 meters wide. The airbase was used for handling of military aircraft flying from the inner part of the German Reich, carrying supplies to troops on the Eastern Front. Airlines Air Cairo Air Mediterranean AlMasria Universal Airlines Astra Airlines Bulgarian Air Charter Corendon Airlines Ellinair Enter Air FlyEgypt LOT Polish Airlines Terminals The airport features three passenger terminals A, B (departures) and C (arrivals) as well as a cargo terminal. Operations at terminal B, much bigger than A, started on 30 July 2007. Terminals are capable of handling about 3.6 million passengers annually. Terminal A handles all non-Schengen departure flights, while Terminal B handles all Schengen departure flights.
    [Show full text]
  • Vea Un Ejemplo
    3 To search aircraft in the registration index, go to page 178 Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page 10 Tanker Air Carrier 8 Air Georgian 20 Amapola Flyg 32 Belavia 45 21 Air 8 Air Ghana 20 Amaszonas 32 Bering Air 45 2Excel Aviation 8 Air Greenland 20 Amaszonas Uruguay 32 Berjaya Air 45 748 Air Services 8 Air Guilin 20 AMC 32 Berkut Air 45 9 Air 8 Air Hamburg 21 Amelia 33 Berry Aviation 45 Abu Dhabi Aviation 8 Air Hong Kong 21 American Airlines 33 Bestfly 45 ABX Air 8 Air Horizont 21 American Jet 35 BH Air - Balkan Holidays 46 ACE Belgium Freighters 8 Air Iceland Connect 21 Ameriflight 35 Bhutan Airlines 46 Acropolis Aviation 8 Air India 21 Amerijet International 35 Bid Air Cargo 46 ACT Airlines 8 Air India Express 21 AMS Airlines 35 Biman Bangladesh 46 ADI Aerodynamics 9 Air India Regional 22 ANA Wings 35 Binter Canarias 46 Aegean Airlines 9 Air Inuit 22 AnadoluJet 36 Blue Air 46 Aer Lingus 9 Air KBZ 22 Anda Air 36 Blue Bird Airways 46 AerCaribe 9 Air Kenya 22 Andes Lineas Aereas 36 Blue Bird Aviation 46 Aereo Calafia 9 Air Kiribati 22 Angkasa Pura Logistics 36 Blue Dart Aviation 46 Aero Caribbean 9 Air Leap 22 Animawings 36 Blue Islands 47 Aero Flite 9 Air Libya 22 Apex Air 36 Blue Panorama Airlines 47 Aero K 9 Air Macau 22 Arab Wings 36 Blue Ridge Aero Services 47 Aero Mongolia 10 Air Madagascar 22 ARAMCO 36 Bluebird Nordic 47 Aero Transporte 10 Air Malta 23 Ariana Afghan Airlines 36 Boliviana de Aviacion 47 AeroContractors 10 Air Mandalay 23 Arik Air 36 BRA Braathens Regional 47 Aeroflot 10 Air Marshall Islands 23
    [Show full text]
  • Signatory Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers As of May 1, 2019 Carriers that are highlighted in yellow hold expired Visa Waiver Program Agreements and therefore are no longer authorized to transport VWP eligible passengers to the United States pursuant to the Visa Waiver Program Agreement Paragraph 14. When encountered, please remind them of the need to re-apply. # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2015) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2015) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2013) 26 North Aviation Inc. 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2016) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2017) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2016) 620, Inc. 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2017) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2018) A A OK Jets A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2014) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2014) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2015) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (09/26/2012) ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V. (d/b/a Interjet) (08/24/2011) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2019) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2018) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2019) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2015) Ace Aviation Services Corporation (08/24/2011) Ace Flight Center Inc. (07/30/2012) ACE Flight Operations a/k/a ACE Group (09/20/2015) Ace Flight Support ACG Air Cargo Germany GmbH (03/28/2011) ACG Logistics LLC (02/25/2019) ACL ACM Air Charter Luftfahrtgesellschaft GmbH (02/22/2018) ACM Aviation, Inc. (09/16/2011) ACP Jet Charter, Inc. (09/12/2013) Acromas Shipping Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Ryanair Route Between Milan Bergamo and Tbilisi, Georgia, Takes Off
    THE NEW RYANAIR ROUTE BETWEEN MILAN BERGAMO AND TBILISI, GEORGIA, TAKES OFF Today (6 November) Ryanair, the number one airline in Italy and Europe, launched the new route connecting Milan Bergamo and Tbilisi in Georgia with four weekly flights as part of the winter 2019 scheduling from Milan Bergamo Airport. For winter 2019, Ryanair will be covering 83 routes in total, of which 6 are brand new, and with 7 summer destinations extended for the first time to the winter months, transporting more than 11.1 million passengers to and from Milan Bergamo Airport this year. The routes being extended from the summer are Bremen (twice-weekly), Gothenburg (twice-weekly), Katowice (twice- weekly), Lappeenranta (twice-weekly), London Southend (three weekly flights), Santander (twice-weekly) and Sofia (daily). As well as Tbilisi (four weekly flights), the brand-new destinations are Agadir (twice-weekly), Aqaba (twice-weekly), Eilat Ramon (twice-weekly), Marseilles (four weekly flights) and Yerevan (twice-weekly, beginning 14 January). To celebrate this new route, Ryanair has launched a special offer for travellers departing from Milan Bergamo Airport. Passengers can book a flight from Milan Bergamo Airport to one of the 83 destinations proposed by the airline with fares as low as just € 14.99. The promotion, subject to availability, can be booked until Saturday (9 November) for departures until the end of March 2020 from the Ryanair website only. Chiara Ravara from Ryanair stated: “Ryanair is delighted to announce the new route connecting Milan Bergamo to Tbilisi, Georgia, with four weekly flights, as part of our winter 2019 scheduling.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospekt Enter Air – 27 Lipca 2018
    Enter Air S.A. (spółka akcyjna z siedzibą w Warszawie, adres ul. Komitetu Obrony Robotników 74, 02-146 Warszawa, Polska, wpisana do rejestru przedsiębiorców prowadzonego przez Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem KRS 0000441533) Ubieganie się o dopuszczenie i wprowadzenie 10.543.750 akcji zwykłych imiennych (akcje imienne zostaną zamienione na akcje na okaziciela z chwilą ich dematerializacji), w tym 100.000 akcji zwykłych imiennych serii A i 10.443.750 akcji zwykłych imiennych serii B do obrotu na rynku regulowanym prowadzonym przez Giełdę Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie S.A. Niniejszy prospekt emisyjny („Prospekt ”) został sporządzony w związku z ubieganiem się o dopuszczenie i wprowadzenie 10.543.750 akcji zwykłych imiennych spółki Enter Air Spółka Akcyjna z siedzibą w Warszawie („Spółka ”) o wartości nominalnej 1 PLN, w tym 100.000 akcji zwykłych imiennych serii A i 10.443.750 akcji zwykłych imiennych serii B Spółki (akcje imienne zostaną zamienione na akcje na okaziciela z chwilą ich dematerializacji) („Akcje Imienne ” lub „ Akcje Dopuszczane ”) do obrotu na rynku regulowanym (rynku podstawowym) prowadzonym przez Giełdę PapierówWartościowych wWarszawieS.A. („GPW ”) („ Dopuszczenie ”). Na Datę Prospektu 7.000.000 akcji zwykłych Emitenta znajdowało się w obrocie na rynku regulowanym (rynku podstawowym) prowadzonym przez GPW („Akcje Serii C ”). Akcje Serii C nie były notowane na żadnym innym rynku regulowanym ani nie były przedmiotem obrotu w alternatywnym systemie obrotu. Akcje Serii C zostały zarejestrowane w depozycie papierów wartościowych prowadzonym przez Krajowy Depozyt Papierów Wartościowych S.A. („KDPW ”) pod następującym kodem ISIN: PLENTER00017. Zamiarem Spółki jest wprowadzenie 10.543.750Akcji Imiennych do obrotu na rynku podstawowym GPW.
    [Show full text]
  • Flag Carriers: Should We Preserve Them?
    FLAG CARRIERS: SHOULD WE PRESERVE THEM? PEDAGOGICAL CASE STUDY OF MALÉV HUNGARIAN AIRLINES Anett Emese Timár Project submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of Master in International Management Supervisor: Prof. Antonio Robalo, ISCTE Business School, Departamento de Gestão October 2013 Flag carriers: should we preserve them? A case study of Malév Hungarian airlines Acknowledgments Completing a master course is a difficult challenge in anybody’s life who decides to follow up their academic studies. Writing my master thesis was one of the most difficult challenges I faced in all my academic years, which is why I would like to express my gratitude to those who helped me throughout this long process. I would like to give my special thanks to my Supervisor, Professor Antonio Robalo, who guided me on the right path of developing the topic of this dissertation, which was very dear to me, given the fact that I could work with a theme from my home country, Hungary. I would like to thank to all dear colleagues of mine from the MIM 2011-2012 edition, you all contributed to my life, one way or another. I will always keep you all in my hearth! And last but not least, I would like to give special thanks to the best husband on the world, Sérgio Vera Pedro. Thank you very much for all your support, for all your help, and patience you had in these past couple of months! I could have not done it without you! i Flag carriers: should we preserve them? A case study of Malév Hungarian airlines Table of Contents Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 16325/09 ADD 1 GW/Ay 1 DG C III COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 November 2009 THE EUROPEAN UNION 16325/09 ADD 1 AVIATION 191 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 18 November 2009 to: Mr Javier SOLANA, Secretary-General/High Representative Subject: Commission staff working document accompanying the report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council European Community SAFA Programme Aggregated information report (01 january 2008 to 31 december 2008) Delegations will find attached Commission document SEC(2009) 1576 final. ________________________ Encl.: SEC(2009) 1576 final 16325/09 ADD 1 GW/ay 1 DG C III EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 18.11.2009 SEC(2009) 1576 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT accompanying the REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SAFA PROGRAMME AGGREGATED INFORMATION REPORT (01 January 2008 to 31 December 2008) [COM(2009) 627 final] EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT AGGREGATED INFORMATION REPORT (01 January 2008 to 31 December 2008) Appendix A – Data Collection by SAFA Programme Participating States (January-December 2008) EU Member States No. No. Average no. of inspected No. Member State Inspections Findings items/inspection 1 Austria 310 429 41.37 2 Belgium 113 125 28.25 29.60 3 Bulgaria 10 18 4 Cyprus 20 11 42.50 5 Czech Republic 29 19 32.00 6 Denmark 60 16 39.60 7 Estonia 0 0 0 8 Finland 120 95 41.93 9 France 2,594 3,572 33.61 10 Germany 1,152 1,012 40.80 11 Greece 974 103 18.85 12 Hungary 7 9 26.57 13 Ireland 25 10 48.80 14 Italy 873 820 31.42 15 Latvia 30 34 30.20 16 Lithuania 12 9 48.08 17 Luxembourg 26 24 29.08 18 Malta 13 6 36.54 19 Netherlands 258 819 36.91 EN 2 EN 20 Poland 227 34 39.59 21 Portugal 53 98 46.51 22 Romania 171 80 28.37 23 Slovak Republic 13 5 23.69 24 Slovenia 19 8 27.00 25 Spain 1,230 2,227 39.51 26 Sweden 91 120 44.81 27 United Kingdom 610 445 39.65 Total 9,040 10,148 34.63 Non-EU ECAC SAFA Participating States No.
    [Show full text]