DOCSLIB.ORG

ANDREW JASON COHEN Associate Professor of Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANDREW JASON COHEN Associate Professor of Philosophy Curriculum Vitae, October 2018 ANDREW JASON COHEN Associate Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University [email protected] PO Box 3994 Atlanta, GA 30302-3994 Web: andrewjasoncohen.academia.edu EDUCATION Georgetown University Ph.D., Philosophy (1997) M.A., Philosophy (1994) Emory University B.A., Economics and Philosophy (1989) ACADEMIC POSITIONS HELD Founding Coordinator, Bachelors of Interdisciplinary Studies Program in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (2016-present) Affiliate Faculty Member of the Center for Access to Justice of GSU College of Law (2018-present) Affiliate Faculty Member of the Jean Beer Blumenfeld Center for Ethics (2005-present) Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy (2008-present) Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Assistant Professor 2005-2008) Visiting Professor of Ethics, McDonough School of Business Georgetown University, Washington, DC (Fall 2015) Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Religion James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia (2000-2005) Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (1997-2000) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Social and Political Philosophy AREAS OF COMPETENCE Philosophy of Law; Philosophy of Economics; Business Ethics; Criminal Justice Ethics; Medical Ethics; Environmental Ethics; Normative Ethical Theory; History of Moral, Social, and Political Philosophy; Existentialism; Free Will; Philosophy of Religion PUBLICATIONS: MONOGRAPHS Toleration and Freedom from Harm: Liberalism Reconceived. NY: Routledge, 2018. Reviewed by Peter de Marneffe on Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 4/3/2018 (http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/toleration-and-freedom-from-harm-liberalism-reconceived/) Discussion on Pea Soup’s NDPR Discussion Forum (http://peasoup.us/2018/05/ndpr-forum- on-andrew-j-cohens-toleration-and-freedom-from-harm/). Cohen, page 2 PUBLICATIONS: MONOGRAPHS (CONTINUED) Toleration. Oxford: Polity Press, 2014. Reviewed by Peter Balint (Australasian Journal of Philosophy Volume 92 No. 4, October 2014: 816-817). Reviewed by Aref Ebadi (Political Studies Review Volume 13 No. 2, May 2015: 243) Interview on Free Thoughts Podcast, September 2015 (http://www.libertarianism.org/media/free-thoughts/toleration#.pjh6ccu:hBpT) Author Meets Critics session at Central APA 2016. Symposium in Reason Papers Volume 38, No. 2, Winter 2016, with response to comments by Emily M. Crookston and David Kelley. PUBLICATIONS: ARTICLES AND CHAPTERS “What We Should Tolerate Internationally” (Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, forthcoming) “Harm: An Event-Based Feinbergian Account.” The Value and Limits of Academic Speech, Ed. Donald Downs and Chris W. Surprenant. NY: Routledge Press, 2018: 115-135. “Why Paternalists and Social Welfarists Should Oppose Criminal Drug Laws” (coauthored with William Glod). Rethinking Punishment in the Era of Mass Incarceration, Ed. Chris W. Surprenant. NY: Routledge Press, 2018: 225-241) Note: William Glod and I were equal partners in writing this paper. “The Harm Principle and Parental Licensing.” Social Theory and Practice, Volume 43, No. 4, October 2017: 825-849. “Psychological Harm and Free Speech on Campus.” Society, Volume 54 No. 2, July/August 2017: 320-325. (Available at http://rdcu.be/tXQt.) “Response to Emily M. Crookston and David Kelley” (symposium on Toleration). Reason Papers, Volume 38, No. 2, Winter 2016: 27-38. “Contemporary Liberalism and Toleration.” Cambridge Companion to Liberalism, Ed. Steve Wall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 189-211. “Toleration.” International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Ed. LaFollette, Hugh. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2013: 5150-5160. “Exchanges and Relationships: On Hard-headed Economics Capturing the Soft Side of Life.” Social Theory and Practice, Volume 38 No. 2, April 2012: 231-257. “A Conceptual and (Preliminary) Normative Exploration of Waste.” Social Philosophy and Policy, Volume 27 No. 2, Summer 2010: 233-273. (Also printed in Moral Obligation, edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 233-273). “Existentialist Voluntarism as a Source of Normativity.” Philosophical Papers, Volume 37 No. 1, March 2008: 89-129. “What the Liberal State Should Tolerate Within Its Borders.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 37 No. 4, December 2007: 479-513. “What Toleration Is.” Ethics, Volume 115 No. 1, October 2004: 68-95. “Defending Liberalism Against the Anomie Challenge.” Social Theory and Practice, Volume 30 No. 3, July 2004: 391-427. Cohen, page 3 PUBLICATIONS: ARTICLES AND CHAPTERS (CONTINUED) “Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Asocialism.” The Journal of Value Inquiry, Volume 34 Nos. 2- 3, September 2000: 249-261. (Also in Liberalism: New Essays on Liberal Theory, ed. Narveson, Jan and Susan Dimock, Norwelt, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 2000: 101-113). “Does Communitarianism Require Individual Independence?” The Journal of Ethics, Volume 4 No. 3, July 2000: 283-305. “On Universalism: Communitarians, Rorty, and (‘Objectivist’) ‘Liberal Metaphysicians’.” Southern Journal of Philosophy, Volume 38 No. 1, Spring 2000: 39-75. “In Defense of Nietzschean Genealogy.” Philosophical Forum, Volume 30 No. 4, December 1999: 269-288. “Communitarianism, ‘Social Constitution,’ and Autonomy.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 80 No. 2, June 1999: 121-135. “A Defense of Strong Voluntarism.” American Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 35 No. 3, July 1998: 251-265. PUBLICATIONS: ARTICLES AND CHAPTERS IN PROGRESS OR UNDER REVIEW “A Bleeding Heart Libertarian View of Inequality” (in progress, commissioned for Ethics in Practice, 5th Edition, Ed. Hugh Lafollette, Blackwell Publishing) “The Harms of Silencing: From Pierre Bayle to The New Jim Crow” (in progress, for Social Philosophy and Policy Volume 37, No, 2, 2020) “The Harm Principle and Corporations” (in progress) “Toleration and Business Ethics” (in progress) PUBLICATIONS: BOOK REVIEWS Autonomy (Andrew Sneddon, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013). Journal of Moral Philosophy, Volume 13 No. 6, 2016 (764-767). The Justification of Religious Violence (Steve Clarke, John Wiley & Sons, 2014). Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 94 No. 1, 2016 (206). Real Ethics: Rethinking the Foundations of Morality. (John Rist, Cambridge University Press, 2002). Utilitas, Volume 16 No. 1, March 2004 (115-117). Liberalism Beyond Justice (John Tomasi, Princeton University Press, 2001). Humane Studies Review, April 2002 (on-line journal; no longer available). A Case for Conservatism (John Kekes, Cornell University Press, 1998). Ethics, Volume 111 No. 2, January 2001 (411-414). PUBLICATIONS: BLOGS Bleeding Heart Libertarians (bleedingheartlibertarians.com). Regular Contributor and Founding Member. Contributions also at Learn Liberty (learnliberty.org), PeaSoup (www.peasoup.us), Heterodox Academy Blog (heterodoxacademy.org/blog/), and Open Inquiry Project (openinquiryproject.org/blog). Cohen, page 4 PRESENTATIONS “The Harms of Silencing: From Pierre Bayle to The New Jim Crow.” Freedom of Thought: Social Philosophy and Policy Center & Liberty Fund Conference, Park City, UT, July 2019. “Big Business and the Morality of Capitalism.” Foundation for Economic Education Seminar, Georgia Perimeter College-Dunwoody, October, 2018). “Is Capitalism Moral?” Foundation for Economic Education Seminar, Georgia Perimeter College- Clarkston, March 2018 (also: Georgia Perimeter College-Dunwoody, October, 2017). “The Nature of Harm.” The Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Society Conference, New Orleans, LA, March 2018. Also at: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Faculty Conference. Dallas, TX, October 2017. “Overcriminalization & Paternalism” (with Bill Glod). Moral Foundations of Capitalism Conference. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, May 2017. Commentator, Anna Stilz’s Territorial Sovereignty, Chapter 4: Legitimacy and Colonialism. Manuscript Workshop, Jean Beer Blumenfeld Ethics Center, Georgia State University, May 2017. Panelist, “Reforming Criminal Law: Juvenile Sentencing and Non-Ideal Theory.” The Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Society Conference, New Orleans, LA, March 2017. “Libertarianism Excludes Corporations.” The Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Society Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 2017. Also at: Georgetown Institute for the Study of Markets and Ethics, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, October 2015. “Bars Are Bad for You: Why Paternalists Should Oppose Criminal Drug Laws” (with Bill Glod). Against Incarceration Conference, University of New Orleans, Louisiana, September 2016. Author Meets Critics Session on Toleration with Emily M. Crookston, David Kelley, and Shawn Klein. American Association for the Philosophical Study of Society. 2016 Central APA Meeting, Chicago, IL, March 2016. “Freedom From Harm.” Legal and Ethical Studies Program, University of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, October 2015. Also at: George Mason University Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, Fairfax, VA, April 2015. “Libertarianism and Parental Licensing.” University of New Orleans Department of Philosophy, March 2015. Also at: Moral Foundations of Capitalism Conference. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, May 2014. “The Harm Principle and Corporate Welfare (or Tolerationism vs. Promotionism).” University of New Orleans Department of Philosophy, March 2015. “Does Inequality Matter? Yes!” 2014 Association for Private
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Note: This Is a Pre-Print, Draft Manuscript of Toby Svoboda, Duties Regarding Nature: a Kantian Environmental Ethic (Routledge, 2016)
    Note: This is a pre-print, draft manuscript of Toby Svoboda, Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Environmental Ethic (Routledge, 2016). If citing, please consult the published version, which contains substantial revisions. Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Environmental Ethic Draft of Complete Manuscript Toby Svoboda Table of Contents • Introduction: Kant and Environmental Ethics • Chapter 1: Traditional Approaches to Environmental Ethics • Chapter 2: Kantian Approaches to Animal Ethics and Environmental Ethics • Chapter 3: Indirect Duties, Moral Perfection, and Virtuous Dispositions • Chapter 4: Teleology and Non-Human Flourishing • Chapter 5: A Kantian Environmental Virtue Ethic • Conclusion: Advantages of the Kantian Environmental Virtue Ethic • References Introduction, 1 Introduction: Kant and Environmental Ethics Why Environmental Ethics? I have set out in this book to develop and defend a Kantian approach to environmental ethics. This immediately raises a question: why should we want an environmental ethic at all, much less a Kantian one? Human beings face serious environmental problems, such as those associated with climate change, loss of biodiversity, and air pollution.1 It seems clear that these problems have various ethical dimensions, given that they threaten to increase human mortality rates, cause substantial harm to present and future generations, and exacerbate socio-economic injustice.2 Moreover, the impact of human activities on the environment, such as ocean acidification due to anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
    [Show full text]
  • Yaffe-CV 7-20-16
    Gideon Yaffe Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy & Psychology, Yale Law School Yale Law School, P.O. Box 208215, New Haven, CT 06520 [email protected] Publications Books As Author: The Age of Culpability: Children and the Nature of Criminal Responsibility, Oxford University Press, forthcoming. Attempts: In the Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, 2010. Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid’s Theory of Action, Oxford University Press, 2004. Liberty Worth the Name: Locke on Free Agency, Princeton University Press, 2000. As Co-Editor: Rational and Social Agency: The Philosophy of Michael Bratman (with Manuel Vargas), Oxford University Press, 2014. Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell (with David Owen and Paul Hoffman), Broadview Press, 2008. Articles “The Duty Requirement” forthcoming in The Ethics and Law of Omissions, edited by Dana Nelkin and Sam Rickless, Oxford University Press. “Desert for Wrongdoing” in The Journal of Ethics, 2016. “Hypothetical Consent” forthcoming in The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent, edited by Peter Schaber. “Collective Intentionality in the Law” forthcoming in The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality, edited by Kirk Ludgwig and Marija Jankovic. “What Does Recent Neuroscience Tell Us About Criminal Responsibility?” (with Uri Maoz) in Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2015. “Non-Political Images Evoke Neural Predictors of Political Ideology” (middle author--Ahn, W.-Y., Kishida, K. T., Gu, X., Lohrenz, T., Harvey, A. H., Alford, J. R., Smith, K. B., Yaffe, G., Hibbing, J. R., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R.) in Current Biology, v.24, n. 22, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarians in Bush's World
    ESSAY ON LIBERTY+ LIBERTARIANS IN BUSH’S WORLD Todd Seavey* Imagine ordinary, non-ideological people hearing about an obscure politi- cal sect called libertarianism, which emphasizes self-ownership, property rights, resistance to tyranny and violence, the reduction of taxation and regulation, control over one’s own investments, and the de-emphasizing of litigation as a primary means of dispute resolution. Since this philosophy has very few adherents in the general population and is very much a minority position among intellectuals, one might expect proponents of the creed to count themselves lucky, given the likely alternatives, if the president of the country in which most of them live increasingly emphasized the themes of freedom and ownership in his major speeches; toppled brutal totalitarian regimes in two countries while hounding democracy-hating theocratic terrorists around the globe; cut taxes (despite howls even from some in the free-market camp that the cuts were too deep); called for simplification of the tax code; appointed relatively industry-friendly officials to major regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration despite frequent criti- cism by the media; proposed partially privatizing Social Security (America’s largest socialist boondoggle but one long regarded as sacrosanct by political analysts); and pushed tort reform to combat the chilling effect of lawsuits on doctors and manu- facturers. + Essays on Liberty is a continuing series of the Journal of Law & Liberty, dedicated to explorations of freedom and law from perspectives outside the legal academy. * Director of Publications for the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH.org, HealthFactsAnd- Fears.com), which does not necessarily endorse the views expressed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Johann Frick
    JOHANN FRICK Department of Philosophy (609) 258-9494 (office) 212 1879 Hall (609) 258-1502 (fax) Princeton University [email protected] Princeton, New Jersey 08544- http://scholar.princeton.edu/jfrick 1006 AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Normative Ethics; Practical Ethics (including Bioethics); Political Philosophy. AREAS OF COMPETENCE Metaethics; Causation; Philosophy of Action; Wittgenstein. EMPLOYMENT 2020- Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy and the Present Center for Human Values, Princeton University. 2015 – Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy and the 2020 Center for Human Values, Princeton University. Feb 2014 – Instructor in the Department of Philosophy and the Center for 2015 Human Values, Princeton University. EDUCATION 2008 - 2014 Ph.D. in Philosophy, Harvard University. • Dissertation: “Making People Happy, Not Making Happy People: A Defense of the Asymmetry Intuition in Population Ethics”; Committee: T.M. Scanlon, Frances Kamm, Derek Parfit. 2005 - 2008 BPhil degree in Philosophy, Merton College, Oxford University. • Distinction in both the written examinations and the BPhil thesis. • BPhil thesis: “Morality and the Problem of Foreseeable Non- Compliance”; advisor: Derek Parfit. • Specialization in Moral Philosophy (tutor: Ralph Wedgwood); Political Philosophy (tutors: Joseph Raz and John Tasioulas); Wittgenstein (tutor: Stephen Mulhall). 2006 - 2007 Visiting student at the École Normale Supérieure (ENS) in Paris. • Courses and seminars at the ENS, the Institut Jean Nicod, and the Collège de France; tutor: François Recanati. 2002 - 2005 BA (Hons.) degree in Philosophy, Politics & Economics, St. John’s College, Oxford University. • First Class Honours in the Final Examinations (June 2005). • Distinction in the Preliminary Examination (June 2003). FELLOWSHIPS, AWARDS, AND HONORS Richard Stockton Bicentennial Preceptorship, Princeton University (2018-2021), awarded annually to one or two assistant professors from all the humanities and social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contested Legacy of Ayn Rand
    THE CONTESTED LEGACY OF AYN RAND Truth and Toleration in Objectivism THE CONTESTED LEGACY OF AYN RAND THE CONTESTED LEGACY OF AYN RAND Truth and Toleration in Objectivism DAVID KELLEY The OBJECTIVIST CENTER Transaction Publishers Poughkeepsie, New York New Brunswick (U.S.) & London (U.K.) First Printing, February, 1990 Second Revised Edition, 2000 Copyright © 1990 by David Kelley Copyright © 2000 by David Kelley All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted in any form without written permission from the author. For information address Dr. David Kelley, The Objectivist Center, 11 Raymond Avenue, Suite 31, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kelley, David, 1949– The Contested Legacy of Ayn Rand: Truth and Toleration in Objectivism/ David Kelley Includes bibliographic references (p. 103–111) and index. ISBN 1-57724-010-3 Printed in the United States of America The Objectivist Center 11 Raymond Avenue, Suite 31 Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE TO THE 2ND EDITION 9 INTRODUCTION 13 I. MORAL JUDGMENT 19 COGNITION AND EVALUATION 19 MORAL JUDGMENT 21 TYPES OF MORAL JUDGMENT 23 THE TEMPERAMENT OF A JUDGE 28 II. SANCTION 31 EXISTENTIAL AID AND MORAL SANCTION 31 THE CASE OF LIBERTARIANISM 36 III. ERROR AND EVIL 39 IDEAS AND ORIGINAL SIN 40 THE ROLE OF IDEAS IN HISTORY 43 THE SCOPE OF HONEST ERROR 50 INHERENTLY DISHONEST IDEAS 57 IV. TOLERATION 61 TOLERANCE, JUSTICE, AND BENEVOLENCE 61 TOLERANCE AND OBJECTIVITY 63 V. OBJECTIVISM 71 OPEN AND CLOSED SYSTEMS 73 OBJECTIVISM AS AN OPEN SYSTEM 75 WHAT IS OBJECTIVISM? 81 THE OBJECTIVIST MOVEMENT 85 POSTSCRIPT 95 NOTES 103 APPENDIX A: A QUESTION OF SANCTION 113 APPENDIX B: BETTER THINGS TO DO 119 INDEX 123 PREFACE TO THE 2ND EDITION 2000 Ayn Rand’s philosophical novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged made her the most controversial author of her age.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Titles on Display
    ABCD springer.com Springer Titles on Display American Philosophical Association - Eastern Division 2008 Franklin Hall B, Philadelphia Marriott Philadelphia, PA December 27 — 30, 2008 20% Discount valid through January 30 2009 Discount applicable to all Springer books. Mention reference E30290S when ordering. Credit cards preferred (AMEX, MasterCard, VISA). Springer ships internationally. Prices do not include tax or shipping. Order form with discount code at the back of this list. springerlink.com SpringerLink The world’s most comprehensive online collection of scientifi c, technological and medical journals, books and reference works Journals, eBooks and eReference Works integrated on a single user interface New powerful search engine Extensive Online Archives Collection Organized in 13 subject Collections To browse our content visit springerlink.com VISIT TODAY 012521a 012521a_210x276ma_4c.indd 1 24.07.2007 14:05:38 Uhr APA - Eastern Division 2008, Philadelphia, PA 7 December 27 — 30, 2008 1 springer.com Science and Its History Nanotechnology & Society Symbolic Landscapes A Reassessment of the Historiography Current and Emerging Ethical Issues G. Backhaus, J. Murungi (Eds.) of Science F. Allhoff, P. Lin (Eds.) 2009. Approx. 420 p. 60 illus. Hardcover J. Agassi 2008. XXXIV, 300 p. Hardcover 978-1-4020-8702-8 7 $269.00 Exhibits Price 7 $215.20 2008. 500 p. 10 illus. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy 978-1-4020-6208-7 7 $119.00 of Science, Volume 253) Dustjacket Exhibits Price 7 $95.20 978-1-4020-5631-4 7 $159.00 Exhibits Price 7 $127.20 Extensionalism: The Revolution Physicians at War in Logic The Dual-Loyalties Challenge N. Bar- Am Thinking about Life F.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathias Risse Curriculum Vitae
    Mathias Risse Curriculum Vitae John F. Kennedy School of Government Office: (617) 495 9811 Harvard University Fax: (617) 495 4297 79 JFK St / Rubenstein 209 Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] USA https://www.hks.harvard.edu/about/faculty-staff-directory/mathias-risse Citizenship: German and American Employment Since 2018: Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Administration; Director of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy; Affiliated Faculty in the Department of Philosophy 2000-2005: Assistant Professor, 2005 – 2010: Associate Professor, 2010-2018 Professor of Philosophy and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2000 - 2002: Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Yale University Areas of Teaching and Research Areas of Specialization: Social and Political Philosophy, Ethics (Systematic, Applied) Areas of Competence: 19th Century German Philosophy, especially Nietzsche; Decision Theory (Individual and Group), Philosophy of Science (General); Logic Education 1995- 2000: Princeton University, Department of Philosophy Ph.D., Summer 2000; M.A., 1997 1990-1995: University of Bielefeld (Germany), Departments of Philosophy and Mathematics and Institute for Mathematical Economics M.S. (Diplom), 1996, Mathematics, supervisor Robert Aumann, Hebrew University; exam areas probability/measure theory, game theory, logic, algebraic topology; grade sehr gut (very good) B.S. (Vordiplom), 1992, Mathematics and Mathematical Economics, grade sehr gut B.A. (Zwischenprüfung),
    [Show full text]
  • Serviço Público Federal
    Serviço Público Federal UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL INSTITUTO DE FILOSOFIA E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA O chefe do DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA do INSTITUTO DE FILOSOFIA E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS (IFCH) DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL, no uso de suas atribuições, de acordo com a Lei nº 12.772/2012, de 28/12/2012, e com a Decisão Nº 232/2014 do Conselho Universitário da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (CONSUN), torna público que estarão abertas, no período de 03/10/2019 a 18/10/2019, as inscrições para o processo avaliativo com vistas à promoção para a Classe E, com denominação de Professor Titular da Carreira do Magistério Superior. DOS REQUISITOS I - Possuir o título de Doutor; II - Ter cumprido o interstício mínimo de 24 (vinte e quatro) meses no último nível da Classe D, com denominação de Professor Associado; III - Ser aprovado em processo de Avaliação de Desempenho Acadêmico; IV – Lograr aprovação em defesa de Memorial, que deverá considerar as atividades de ensino, pesquisa, extensão, gestão acadêmica e produção profissional relevante de sua carreira acadêmica, ou em defesa de Tese Acadêmica inédita. DA INSCRIÇÃO As inscrições ao processo avaliativo serão recebidas pela Secretaria de Departamento no horário das 13h30 às 17h30, em formulário próprio (modelo Anexo I deste Edital), acompanhado da portaria da última progressão e do título de doutor, no qual o interessado optará por submeter-se à defesa de Memorial ou Tese Acadêmica inédita. A homologação da inscrição dar-se-á após a entrega, pelo docente, do seu Memorial ou Tese Acadêmica inédita, em formato eletrônico e físico, com vistas ao processo avaliativo, em no máximo quinze dias corridos desde a inscrição do docente em seu Departamento de lotação.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ethics &Social Philosophy
    Journal of Ethics & social Philosophy Volume XIII · Number 2 May 2018 Articles 91 A Tripartite Theory of Love Sam Shpall 125 Practical Reason Not as Such Kenneth Walden 154 In or Out? On Benevolent Absolutisms in The Law of Peoples Robert Huseby Discussion 179 Shared Intention Is Not Joint Commitment Matthew Kopec and Seumas Miller Journal of Ethics Social Philosophy http://www.jesp.org & TheJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (issn 1559-3061) is a peer-reviewed online journal in moral, social, political, and legal philosophy. The journal is founded on the principle of publisher-funded open access. There are no publication fees for authors, and public access to articles is free of charge and is available to all readers under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. Funding for the journal has been made possible through the generous commitment of the Gould School of Law and the Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences at the University of Southern California. TheJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy aspires to be the leading venue for the best new work in the fields that it covers, and it is governed by a correspondingly high editorial standard. The journal welcomes submissions of articles in any of these and related fields of research. The journal is interested in work in the history of ethics that bears directly on topics of contemporary interest, but does not consider articles of purely historical interest. It is the view of the associate editors that the journal’s high standard does not preclude publishing work that is critical in nature, provided that it is constructive, well- argued, current, and of sufficiently general interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara Smith's Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: a Positive Contribution?
    Reason Papers Vol. 35, no. 1 Response to Eyal Mozes, “Tara Smith’s Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics: A Positive Contribution?” Carrie-Ann Biondi Marymount Manhattan College Irfan Khawaja Felician College 1. Introduction In this discussion note, we respond to Eyal Mozes’s critique of Tara Smith’s Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics via his criticism of Carrie-Ann Biondi’s review of that book in Reason Papers.1 We take issue with Mozes’s discussion of Ayn Rand’s non-conflicts-of-interest principle (NCIP) along with his discussion of the nature of moral virtue. We end by taking issue with his inappropriately moralized conception of philosophical discourse. Since we agree with many (though not all) of Mozes’s claims about emergencies and the scope of morality, we leave those topics undiscussed. 2. Conflicts of Interest Mozes offers two objections to Smith’s discussion of the NCIP: For any book that purports to be a presentation of Rand’s normative ethics, a crucial part of its task is to give an elaborate explanation and defense of Rand’s no-conflicts-of-interest-principle, filling in the details of Rand’s own cursory discussion. In evaluating such a book, I don’t think there’s any question more important than how well it succeeds in explaining and defending this principle. Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics disgracefully fails in this task.2 We reject every element of this criticism. 1 Tara Smith, Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), hereafter ARNE; Carrie-Ann Biondi, “Review Essay: Tara Smith’s Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist,” Reason Papers 30 (Fall 2008), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Are You Suprised ?
    M A R T H A C. N USSBAUM Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics Department of Philosophy and Law School The University of Chicago MAILING ADDRESS: The University of Chicago Law School ◊ 1111 East 60th Street ◊ Chicago IL 60637 TELEPHONE: (773) 702-0303 ◊ FAX: (773) 702-0730 E-MAIL: [email protected] EDUCATION 1964-1966 Wellesley College 1966-1967 New York University, School of the Arts 1967-1969 New York University, Washington Square College. B.A. 1969. 1969-1975 Harvard University, M.A. 1971, Ph.D. 1975 (Classical Philology) 1972-1975 Harvard University, Society of Fellows, Junior Fellow 1973-1974 St. Hugh's College, Oxford University: Honorary Member of Senior Common Room EMPLOYMENT 1999-- University of Chicago, Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics Appointed in Law School and Philosophy Department, 2012 -- Appointed in: Law School, Philosophy Department, and Divinity School, -2012 Associate Member, Classics Department (1995 -- ) Associate Member, Department of Political Science (2003 -- ) Associate Member, Divinity School, (2012 --) Member, Committee on Southern Asian Studies (Affiliate 1999 –2005, full Member 2006--) Board Member,, Center for Gender Studies 1999-2002 Board Member, Human Rights Program, 2002--; Co-Chair, 2007-8; Founder and Coordinator, Center for Comparative Constitutionalism, 2002 –10. Steering Committee, University of Chicago Center in Delhi, 2014--. 2007 (spring) Visiting Professor of Law and Classics, Harvard University 2004 (spring) Visiting Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • A Reply to Tibor Machan
    LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 2, ART. NO. 9 (2010) WHEN IS A MONOPOLY NOT A MONOPOLY? A REPLY TO TIBOR MACHAN * NICHOLAS DYKES IN A LENGTHY FOOTNOTE to his essay “Reconciling Anarchism and Minarchism”1 (henceforth RAM) Tibor Machan accuses me of engaging in equivocation, and also of psychologising, in my essay “The Facts of Reality: Logic and History in Objectivist Debates about Government”2 (henceforth TFOR). Machan writes: … Dykes doesn’t seem to realise that monopoly in the use of retaliatory force is not the same as a legal or coercive monopoly in that use. He persists in this equivocation. Yet, one can have a monopoly that comes about naturally, because it is freely granted to one by people—as, say, they effectively granted the Beatles monopoly status in rock music or Fred Astaire in dancing or IBM in computers and Microsoft in software … without keeping anyone out by force. Furthermore, if people freely select a group of specialists to protect them by way of a long-term binding contract [or compact] that’s not to establish an objectionable, coercive monopoly, merely an exclusive but binding relationship …. It is along such lines that Rand’s notion of the “monopoly” of retaliatory force needs to be understood (RAM 61). Machan adds further on that equivocation is a “serious flaw” in my essay. To begin with, let’s be clear about what the term ‘equivocation’ means. I hardly need to point out that it is a fallacy in logic, one which involves *Nicholas Dykes ([email protected]), a British-Canadian writer currently living in England, is author of Old Nick’s Guide to Happiness: A Philosophical Novel (Ledbury, UK: Lathé Biosas Publishing, 2008).
    [Show full text]