DOCSLIB.ORG

IUFRO Division 9: Forest Policy and Economics Research Group 9.06.00 (Former 6.13.00): Forest Law and Environmental Legislation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUFRO Division 9: Forest Policy and Economics Research Group 9.06.00 (Former 6.13.00): Forest Law and Environmental Legislation Research Collection Conference Proceedings Legal aspects of European forest sustainable development proceedings of the 12th international symposium, Cyprus Author(s): Šulek, Rastislav; Herbst, Peter; Schmithüsen, Franz Josef Publication Date: 2012 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-009991119 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library IUFRO Division 9: Forest Policy and Economics Research Group 9.06.00 (former 6.13.00): Forest Law and Environmental Legislation Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Cyprus Editors Rastislav Šulek, Peter Herbst and Franz Schmithüsen Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management Technical University in Zvolen 2012 IMPRESSUM Rastislav Šulek, Peter Herbst, Franz Schmithüsen (Editors) Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium, Cyprus The authors are fully responsible for the content of their articles included in the proceedings Published by: Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management, Technical University in Zvolen, Slovak Republic Layout and design by: Rastislav Šulek Copy Right: Editors and Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen PREFACE 6.13.00 – this used to be the numerical code standing for forest law and environmental legislation, not only within IUFRO (International Union of Forest Research Organizations (cf. www.iufro.org)) but far beyond that. Now that code has been changed to 9.06.00 – the substance, however, remained untouched. IUFRO research group 9.06.00 has been operating world-wide over decades now to collect, evaluate and document, disseminate and also critically analyse developments in forest law and environmental legislation, with special emphasis on Central and Eastern European countries, not only, but in particular such with economies in transition. This within the unit's general and foremost objective, i. e. to foster exchange of information amongst researchers and practitioners active in the domain of forest law and environmental legislation, and to permanently review the state of the subject, thereby setting priorities concerning research and practice. There is a huge amount of publications published by this research group, and each of them proves how this unit meets its high standards (cf http://www.iufro.org/science/divisions/division-9/90000/90600/publications/). Thanks to the many lawyers amongst that group, it has also been highly successful in accomplishing the scientific transfer between traditional forestry communities and legal circles. The group's work distinctively contributed to ease long-standing deadlocks, by connecting policy and law in research and in real life as well as in policy and law design and foremost in policy and law implementation. Starting from 1998, the former IUFRO 6.13.00, now 9.06.00 has regularly been organising workshops to discuss legal aspects of European forest sustainable development in a non- formal and thus highly productive way. The 1st International Symposium on (then) "Experiences with new forest and environmental laws in European countries with economies in transition" was held in Ossiach, Austria in June, 1998. This meeting was followed by the 2nd symposium on the same topic, again in Ossiach, Austria in October 1999 (with presentation of its main results during the XXIst IUFRO World Congress in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in August 2000). The 3rd International Symposium was held in Jundola, Bulgaria in June, 2001, followed by meetings in Jaunmokas, Latvia in August, 2002, then in Zidlochovice, Czech Republic (May 2003), and after that follow-up symposia took place in Poiana Brasov, Romania, in June 2004; in Zlatibor Mt., Serbia, in May 2005; in Istanbul, Turkey, in May 2006; in Zikatar, Armenia, in June 2007; in Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, in May 2008; as well as in Zvolen (Slovakia) in May 2009, and now in Lemesos (Cyprus) for the 12th Symposium on "Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development", in May/June 2010. On the occasion of their 12th International Symposium on “Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development”, IUFRO 9.06.00 entered uncharted territory, twice: Besides being the first ever scientific congress on the island of Cyprus covering such forestry topics, this meeting - unlike most other such meetings on European level, which usually are organized by scientific and/or state institutions - was hosted by a grass-root organisation, Cyprus’ largest farmers’ association, Panagrotikos. Forty-one researchers and practitioners originating from eighteen different countries met in Lemesos/Cyprus (31 May – 3 June, 2010) and used this opportunity to get acquainted, involved and familiar with the new legal situation not only in European forests, but, profiting from the presence of participants from across the world, also Cameroon, Japan and Iran. 3 The participants were surprised to experience the long-standing tradition of sustainable forestry on the host island, which combined with the amenities of the Mediterranean Sea helped to create the very right atmosphere for that meeting of experts reviewing the state of forest laws and environmental legislation. This time, the main focus was on the role of forests, the goals of forest management and the objectives of public policies addressing sustainable forest management. Specifically, issues like legal aspects of different types of forest land tenure, legal regulations of forest management plans as a tool for sustainable forest management, the status of compensation of forest owners for ownership restrictions in the public or private interest, legal and Institutional status of national parks as tool for sustainable forest management, as well as the legal and institutional framework for recreation and environmental markets for forest enterprises were analysed and discussed by international and local participants. The symposium was kindly hosted by Panagrotikos Sydesmos of Cyprus and supported by the respective governmental agencies and all institutions involved in the management of the local forests and natural environment of the Republic of Cyprus, as well as the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland. The meeting was organized by Nektarios Karios and his staff at Panagrotikos, as well as Peter Herbst (IUFRO 6.13.00). The high relevance of this meeting was emphasised by the attendance and active participation of the Leader of the Democratic Rally of Cyprus, Mr. Nicos Anastasiades, as well as the Minister of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment of Cpyrus, Mr. Demetris Eliades. Interested in IUFRO 9.06.00? You are welcome to visit http://www.iufro.org/science/divisions/division-9/90000/90600/ for more information, or directly contact the coordinator via email, <[email protected]>. Peter Herbst Coordinator IUFRO Forest Law and Environmental Legislation, 9.06.00 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM OF FOREST HABITATS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'NATURA2000' STANDARDS IN THE GEORGIAN LEGISLATION MAIA AKHALKATSI , MARIAM KIMERIDZE .................................................................................................................... 6 POLITICAL ASPECT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY: PERCEPTION BY DEPUTIES IN THE PARLIAMENT OF SERBIA TOWARDS FORESTRY AS A SOURCE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY DANKO ALEKSIC .................................................................................................................................................... 20 EU REGULATIONS ON TROPICAL TIMBER AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACTS IN THE CONGO BASIN REGION SAMUEL ASSEMBE-MVONDO ................................................................................................................................... 32 RESULTS AND EXPERIENCES IN DEVELOPMENT OF NEW (DRAFT) MONTENEGRIN FOREST LAW WITH PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO PRIVATE FORESTRY FRANC FERLIN, MILOSAV ANDJELIC .......................................................................................................................... 43 LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF ALTERNATIVE FOREST USE AND PROCEDURES ANDRANIK GHULIJANYAN ........................................................................................................................................ 44 COLLISION BETWEEN NEW PRIVATE FORESTS AND LEASING OF HUNTING LANDS: IN SEARCH OF HARMONY VITALIE GULCA ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMICS ASPECTS OF THE LAW ON FORESTS IN THE LAST TWO DECADES IN SERBIA LJILJANA KEČA, JELENA NEDELJKOVIĆ......................................................................................................................... 59 COMPENSATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY PROTECTION IN FORESTS OF LITHUANIA IMANTAS LAZDINIS, AUŠRA ŠALTENYTĖ ...................................................................................................................... 67 LEGAL AND POLITICAL FRAMEWORK OF SMES IN THE FORESTRY SECTOR: EUROPEAN UNION AND WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES DRAGAN NONIĆ, NENAD RANKOVIĆ, MARKO MARINKOVIĆ, JELENA NEDELJKOVIĆ, PREDRAG GLAVONJIĆ .............................. 79 LEGAL GROUNDS OF FOREST OWNERS’ COOPERATIVES IN JAPAN AND THEIR POSSIBILITIES IKUO OTA ...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development
    IUFRO Division 9: Forest Policy and Economics Research Group 9.06.00 (former 6.13.00): Forest Law and Environmental Legislation Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Cyprus Editors Rastislav Šulek, Peter Herbst and Franz Schmithüsen Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management Technical University in Zvolen 2012 IMPRESSUM Rastislav Šulek, Peter Herbst, Franz Schmithüsen (Editors) Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium, Cyprus The authors are fully responsible for the content of their articles included in the proceedings Published by: Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management, Technical University in Zvolen, Slovak Republic Layout and design by: Rastislav Šulek Copy Right: Editors and Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen PREFACE 6.13.00 – this used to be the numerical code standing for forest law and environmental legislation, not only within IUFRO (International Union of Forest Research Organizations (cf. www.iufro.org)) but far beyond that. Now that code has been changed to 9.06.00 – the substance, however, remained untouched. IUFRO research group 9.06.00 has been operating world-wide over decades now to collect, evaluate and document, disseminate and also critically analyse developments in forest law and environmental legislation, with special emphasis on Central and Eastern European countries, not only, but in particular such with economies in transition. This within the unit's general and foremost objective, i. e. to foster exchange of information amongst researchers and practitioners active in the domain of forest law and environmental legislation, and to permanently review the state of the subject, thereby setting priorities concerning research and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principles of Sustainable Development of Tourism In
    Acta geographica Slovenica, 54-2, 2014, 391–400 THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM IN THE SPECIAL NATURE RESERVE »GORNJE PODUNAVLJE« AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE LOCAL COMMUNITIES Vladimir Stojanovi}, Jasmina \or|evi}, Lazar Lazi}, Igor Stamenkovi}, Vanja Dragi}evi} ] I V O N A J O T S R I M I D A L V Special Nature Reserve Gornje Podunavlje near Bezdan. Vladimir Stojanovi}, Jasmina \or|evi}, Lazar Lazi}, Igor Stamenkovi}, The principles of sustainable development of tourism … The principles of sustainable development of tourism in the special nature reserve »Gornje Podunavlje« and their impact on the local communities DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/ 10.3986/AGS54407 UDC: 913:338.48(497.113) 338.48:712(497.113) COBISS: 1.01 ABSTRACT: The development of tourism in protected areas is a particular challenge for the tourism business and the activity of nature conservation. The leading criteria for sustainable tourism in protected areas empha - size the importance of the adoption of certain principles of care, long -term planning and management that integrates nature protection and tourism. In this respect, the paper analyzes their importance in the case of Special Nature Reserve »Gornje Podunavlje« in Vojvodina. After acquiring the status of a special nature reserve, talk about the importance of this area to the tourism of Sombor and Apatin, where it is located, has increased. This trend follows the design of educational and tourist tracks, starting and running events as well as starting tourism businesses in rural households. There could be multiple benefits of this for the local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • KORICE MICO SED 2016.Cdr
    Third International Conference Higher Education in Function of Sustainable Development of Tourism in Serbia and Western Balkans within 9th International Conference “Science and Higher Education in Function of Sustainable Development – SED 2015” PAPER PROCEEDINGS September 2016, Užice, Serbia 3rd International Conference: "Higher education in function of development of Page i tourism in Serbia and Western Balkans" Publisher Business and Technical College of Vocational Studies, Užice 34 St. Sava’ Square 31 000 Užice, Serbia www.vpts.edu.rs For publisher Ivana Ćirović, Ph.D, Director Editors Milutin Đuričić, Ph.D Ivana Ćirović, Ph.D Nenad Milutinović, M.Sc Technical editing Nenad Milutinovic, M.Sc Design Miroslav Drašković Printed by “GRAFOPLAST PLUS”, Užice Circulation 250 ISBN 978-86-83573-84-4 3rd International Conference: "Higher education in function of development of Page ii tourism in Serbia and Western Balkans" PROGRAM BOARD 1. Milutin Djuricic, Ph.D, professor of vocational studies, Business Technical College of Vocational Studies, Uzice (Serbia) 2. Milena Marjanović, Ph.D, Higher Business School of Vocational Studies, Leskovac (Serbia) 3. Mr Dragan Stojanovic, Higher Business School of Vocational Studies, Leskovac (Serbia) 4. Vladimir Senic, Ph.D, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of hotel management and tourism, Vrnjacka Banja (Serbia) 5. Marija Mandaric, Ph.D, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of hotel management and tourism, Vrnjacka Banja (Serbia) 6. Miroslav Radjen, M.Sc, Tourism Organization of Western Serbia, Uzice (Serbia) 7. Miroslav Ivanovic, Ph.D, Tourism Organization of Western Serbia, Uzice (Serbia) 8. Dragoslav Nikolić, Regional Chamber of Commerce, Uzice (Serbia) 9. Mirjana Krdzic, Regional Chamber of Commerce, Uzice (Serbia) 10. Dragica Samardzic, Chamber of Commerce of Vojvodina, Novi Sad (Serbia) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Forestry Održivo Šumarstvo
    ISSN 1821-1046 UDK 630 INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY INSTITUT ZA ŠUMARSTVO BELGRADE BEOGRAD SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY ODRŽIVO ŠUMARSTVO COLLECTION ZBORNIK RADOVA Vol. 73-74 Vol. 73-74 BELGRADE BEOGRAD 2016. I SSN 1821 - 1046 9 7 7 1 8 2 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 ISSN 1821-1046 UDK 630 INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY INSTITUT ZA ŠUMARSTVO BELGRADE BEOGRAD SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY ODRŽIVO ŠUMARSTVO COLLECTION ZBORNIK RADOVA Vol. 73-74 Vol. 73-74 BELGRADE BEOGRAD 2016. INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY INSTITUT ZA ŠUMARSTVO BELGRADE BEOGRAD COLLECTION OF PAPERS ZBORNIK RADOVA · Publisher Izdavač Institute of Forestry Institut za šumarstvo Belgrade, Serbia Beograd, Srbija · For Publisher Za izdavača Ljubinko Rakonjac, Ph.D. Dr Ljubinko Rakonjac · Editorial Board Redakcioni odbor Snežana Rajković, Ph.D. Dr Snežana Rajković Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Dragana Dražić, Ph.D. Dr Dragana Dražić Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Ljubinko Rakonjac, Ph.D. Dr Ljubinko Rakonjac Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Mara Tabaković-Tošić, Ph.D. Dr Mara Tabaković-Tošić Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Radovan Nevenić, Ph.D. Dr Radovan Nevenić Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Mihailo Ratknić, Ph.D. Dr Mihailo Ratknić Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Zoran Miletić, Ph.D. Dr Zoran Miletić Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Milorad Veselinović, Ph.D. Dr Milorad Veselinović Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Biljana Nikolić, Ph.D. Dr Biljana Nikolić Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Vera Lavadinović, Ph.D. Dr Vera Lavadinović Institute of Forestry, Belgrade Institut za šumarstvo, Beograd Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAKON O ŠUMAMA ("Sl
    ZAKON O ŠUMAMA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 30/2010, 93/2012 i 89/2015) I OSNOVNE ODREDBE Predmet zakona Član 1 Ovim zakonom ure đuje se o čuvanje, zaštita, planiranje, gajenje i koriš ćenje šuma, raspolaganje šumama i šumskim zemljištem, nadzor nad sprovo đenjem ovog zakona, kao i druga pitanja zna čajna za šume i šumsko zemljište. Primena zakona Član 2 Odredbe ovog zakona odnose se na šume i šumsko zemljište u svim oblicima svojine. Cilj zakona Član 3 Ovim zakonom obezbe đuju se uslovi za održivo gazdovanje šumama i šumskim zemljištem kao dobrom od opšteg interesa, na na čin i u obimu kojim se trajno održava i unapre đuje njihova proizvodna sposobnost, biološka raznovrsnost, sposobnost obnavljanja i vitalnost i unapre đuje njihov potencijal za ublažavanje klimatskih promena, kao i njihova ekonomska, ekološka i socijalna funkcija, a da se pri tome ne pri činjava šteta okolnim ekosistemima. Opšti interes Član 4 Očuvanje, zaštita i unapre đenje stanja šuma, koriš ćenje svih potencijala šuma i njihovih funkcija i podizanje novih šuma u cilju postizanja optimalne šumovitosti, prostornog rasporeda i strukture šumskog fonda u Republici Srbiji, jesu delatnosti od opšteg interesa. Zaštita opšteg interesa iz stava 1. ovog člana obezbe đuje se: 1) zabranom trajnog smanjivanja površina pod šumama; 2) pove ćanjem ukupnog šumskog fonda, kao i udela državnog vlasništva u šumama u Republici Srbiji, a naro čito u šumama s posebnom namenom; 3) finansiranjem o čuvanja, zaštite i unapre đivanja stanja postoje ćih i podizanja novih šuma, izrade planova i programa
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Potential of Serbian Protected Areas Dear Reader
    ATLAS OF TOURISM POTENTIAL OF SERBIAN PROTECTED AREAS Dear reader, Serbia’s protected areas, the jewels of the country, contain nu- merous wonders of nature. A variety of rare, endangered animal and plant species can be observed in their natural habitat. Desi- gnating protected areas allows the provision of safe harbours for these species and ecosystems, which in many cases are unique. And promoting nature-respecting tourism and recreation in the- se areas not only allows visitors to explore these wonders, but also contributes to the livelihood of the people and communities who have lived in and shaped those landscapes over centuries. It is UNDP’s ambition, together with the authorities and people of Serbia, to support tourism and recreation in protected areas, so that you can explore their treasures. Hiking, bird watching, sport fishing, camping, but also adventurous activities, such as mountain biking, canyoning, paragliding or rafting, offer multiple opportunities for spending high quality time outdoors. Tourism infrastructure – like visitor centres, educational signalization, ob- servation towers and walking trails – are currently being built in all the protected areas to facilitate and guide visitors in exploring the nature, while enhancing the understanding and willingness to protect their unique character and inherent, rare species. I hope this “Atlas of Tourism Potential of Serbian Protected Are- as” will inspire you, guide you to remote corners of Serbia, and wake your curiosity to explore some of the most beautiful sides of this country. I would like to use the opportunity express my gratitude to the protected area managers for their valuable con- tribution in preparing it.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. BIODIVERSITY IN SERBIA – STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS; SIGNIFICANCE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR HUMAN WELL-BEING 14 1.1. Abiotic and biotic factors of biodiversity in Serbia 14 1.2. Diversity of ecosystems in Serbia 15 1.3. Threats and pressures exerted on biodiversity in sensitive ecosystems 18 1.3.1. Pressures on biodiversity - examples 22 1.4. Protected areas 28 1.4.1. National protected areas 29 1.4.2. Areas of international importance for the conservation of biodiversity 34 1.5. Protected species 36 1.5.1. Diversity of macromycetes in Serbia 41 1.6. Overview of studies and data on ecosystem services in Serbia 43 1.7. Natural resource systems and well-being of people in Serbia 48 1.7.1. Agricultural land in Serbia 49 1.7.2. Allocation of agricultural land 50 1.7.3. National agroecological program 53 1.7.5. Fish resources in Serbia 55 1.7.6. Forest ecosystems 57 1.7.7. Ecosystem services – forest ecosystems 60 1.7.8. Collection of wild species from nature 63 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR BIODIVERSITY WITH AN ACTION PLAN AND THE INCLUSION OF BIODIVERSITY INTO OTHER SECTORS 70 2.1. The Strategy for biodiversity of the Republic of Serbia with the Action plan for the period from 2011 to 2018 70 2.2. Strategic goals of biodiversity 71 2.3. Review of the Strategy of biodiversity in Serbia 74 2.4. Activities taken at the national level regarding implementation of the Convention on Biodiversity, after submission of the Fourth national report (2011-2014) 75 2.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Assessment of Protected Areas' Management
    sustainability Article Monitoring and Assessment of Protected Areas’ Management Capacities in the Republic of Serbia Nikola Banjac 1,2, Rado Maksimovi´c 2 , Katarina Dragaš 3 and Jelena Iveti´c 2,* 1 Assembly of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia; [email protected] 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 December 2018; Accepted: 22 January 2019; Published: 28 January 2019 Abstract: The necessity to measure the effectiveness of the management of protected areas has been widely recognized. This paper aims to show a realistic state of affairs in protected area management in the Republic of Serbia on the basis of the results of managers’ monitoring and their obligations stipulated by law. It will also answer questions on which form of management is optimal, by means of a proposed assessment model. The research has been performed on a sample of 30 sensu stricto protected areas, managed by 21 different managers. For the purpose of ranking and comparing the degree of protected area management effectiveness, the use of a normalized aggregate function (scoring) has been introduced. Results show that about half of the analyzed protected areas have no adequate management in terms of legally prescribed management criteria, as well as that management effectiveness is related to several external factors. The authors conclude that meeting all criteria stipulated by law, and the existence of professional staff represent fundamental factors for the effective management of protected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS Serbia Biodiversity Analysis
    PHOTO CREDIT: PAT FOSTER-TURLEY FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS Serbia Biodiversity Analysis JULY 2018 This report was authored by Patricia Foster-Turley PhD, Gabor Mesaros, PhD and Majda Sedej, MA. It was submitted by Jeff Ploetz to USAID/Serbia. This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by The Cloudburst Group under USAID Global Environmental Management Support project (GEMS II), Award Number AID-OAA-M-13000018 Task Order EE-02. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. GEMS II is implemented by: The Cloudburst Group 8400 Corporate Drive, Suite 550 Landover, MD 20785-2238 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 TOP PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS 3 SECOND PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS 3 I. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 PURPOSE 4 1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE USAID PROGRAM 4 1.3 METHODOLOGY 5 II. COUNTRY CONTEXT 6 2.1 LOCATION AND COUNTRY CONTEXT 6 2.2 BIOPHYSICAL SETTING 6 III. STATUS OF SERBIA’S BIODIVERSITY 7 3.1 MAJOR ECOSYSTEM TYPES AND STATUS 7 3.2 SPECIES DIVERSITY AND STATUS 9 3.3 GENETIC DIVERSITY 10 3.4 STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS 10 3.5 STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF KEY NATURAL RESOURCES OUTSIDE PROTECTED AREAS 11 IV. VALUE AND ECONOMIC POTENTIAL 12 4.1 VALUE OF BIODIVERSITY/ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 12 4.2 ECOSYSTEM GOODS AND SERVICES 12 V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AFFECTING CONSERVATION 14 5.1 NATIONAL LAWS, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES 14 5.2 INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS 15 5.3 GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS 15 5.4 CONSERVATION INITIATIVES: GAP ANALYSIS 16 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGY of ECO-CYCLING TOURISM DEVELOPMENT By
    STRATEGY OF ECO-CYCLING TOURISM DEVELOPMENT Project: Fostering enhanced ecotourism planning along the Eurovelo cycle route network in the Danube region, EcoVeloTour DTP-055-2.2 Financed by: Interreg Danube Transnational Programme Subotica, 2020 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Information on the goal of the project, its mission and strategic directions ................................... 3 1.2. Methodology of the strategy ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3. About cycling and recreation in general and the possibilities of their tourist valorisation ........... 6 1.4. Tradition and interesting historical facts about cycling in the micro-region ............................... 10 2. The role of bicycle and ecotourism in the development of the micro-region ............................... 13 2.1. Eco dimension and cycling dimension .............................................................................................. 13 2.2 A snapshot of the current situation ................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1. SWOT analysis ................................................................................................................................ 29 2.3. The benefits of linking eco and bicycle tourism, stakeholders at microregional level ................. 40 2.4. Eco-cycling
    [Show full text]
  • COMPETITION PROGRAMME for the Public International Two-Phase Open
    CITY OF BELGRADE CITY ADMINISTRATION – SECRETARIAT FOR CULTURE In cooperation with the Association of Belgrade Architects COMPETITION PROGRAMME For the public international two-phase open competition for the design of a conceptual solution for the Zoran Đinđić memorial at the Students square in Belgrade March 2017 COMPETITION PROGRAMME For the public international two-phase open competition for the design of a conceptual solution for the Zoran Đinđić memorial at the Students square in Belgrade Competition commissioned/organised by City of Belgrade, City Administration – Secretariat for Culture www.beograd.rs Competition implementation Association of Belgrade Architects, Kneza Milosa 7/III, Belgrade www.dab.rs 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1. MOTIVE AND GOAL FOR LAUNCHING THE COMPETITION 2. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPACE 2.1 Characteristics 2.1.2 General Characteristics 2.1.2 The existing situation 2.1.3 Reconstruction 2.2 Natural Characteristics - Climate and Green Areas 2.3 The History of the Space, Architectural and Cultural Heritage 3. TERMS OF REFERENCE 3.1 General Guidelines 3.2 Position of the Memorial, Spatial and Dimensional Limitations 3.3 Recommendations for the Approach to Architectural and Cultural Heritage 3.3 Guidelines for the First and the Second Stage of the Competition 4. CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE DESIGNS 5. RULES OF THE COMPETITION 5.1 Terms for Participating 5.2 Terms for the Implementation 5.3 Content of the Competing Work 5.4 Method of Technical and Design Processing of the Competition Design 5.5 Content
    [Show full text]