General Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Introduction GENERAL INTRODUCTION Rodents pose a threaten towards crops in fields and stores. In addition, they may attack people and their domestic animals spreading many infectious diseases via their endo- and ectoparasites. The control of Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.), the most prevailing species lives close to man, depends mainly on rodenticides such as metal phosphides, fluoroacetamide, hypercalcemics and the worldwide commonly used coumarin-derived anticoagulants. Constituting over 40% of all mammal species, Rodents are the largest and most successful group of mammals worldwide. They have a high rate of reproduction and a good ability to adapt to a wide variety of habitats (Parshad 1999) Although rodents are often only associated with infrastructural damages, crop attacking and eating or spoiling of stored food and products, the veterinary and zoonotic risks of rodents are frequently underestimated. Wild rodents can be reservoirs and vectors of a number of agents that cause serious diseases for human and domestic animal; there are more than 20 transmissible diseases that are known to be directly transmitted by rodents to humans, by the assistance of blood- sucking parasites like fleas, ticks and mites (Khatoon et al. 2004). Wild rodents act as definitive and/or intermediate hosts of many parasites, which are common to domestic animals, and humans. Some rodent parasites are epidemiologically important as they are prevalent parasites of humans and their domestic animals. The eggs of parasites are passed out in rodent droppings in fields, grain stores and amongst foodstuffs in houses, and are responsible for disease spread (Khatoon et al. 2004). As rodents live in a close proximity with human and their animals and expose to the blood-sucking arthropods, the possibility for transmission of parasites increases. Controlling of rodents and their endo- and ectoparasites has been done mainly using anticoagulant rodenticides. The repeated use and application of such anticoagulant rodenticides for long periods may result in the rapid development of resistance to these compounds in wild rodent species. Resistance to anticoagulants can develop in a population after 5-10 years sustained use of anticoagulant rodenticides. No enough data exist on the baseline susceptibility of rodent populations in Egypt to anticoagulants or their changing patterns of susceptibility in areas of sustained use. Monitoring systems for rodent populations and changes to poisoning methods will assist Egypt rodent control groups in avoiding the resistance-induced control problems now seen outside Egypt. Sustained control of rodents is likely to be substantially dependent on toxicants, and anticoagulant poisons in particular, for the foreseeable future. 2 The aim of this work This study was carried out to determine what the major Norway rat parasites are, and to monitor its resistance to warfarin anticoagulant rodenticide at some governorates of Egypt. Therefore, the scope of the present work was to cover the following points: 1- To study the Norway rat species population structure at four different governorates. 2- To identify Norway rat helminthic parasites and to determine their incidence and distribution at four different governorates. 3- To identify Norway rat ectoparasites, and to determine their prevalence and general indices that is useful to understand the role of arthropod vectors as well as mammalian reservoirs in the maintenance of various diseases in the study areas. 4- To monitor the Norway rat resistance to warfarin (First generation anticoagulant rodenticide) at four different governorates by using the conventional method, non- choice feeding test. 5- To monitor the Norway rat resistance to anticoagulants rodenticides (warfarin) at four different governorates through VKORC1 analysis using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique. 3 4 Part I: Endo and Ectoparasites of Rattus norvegicus INTRODUCTION Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus (Berk. 1769), is a cosmopolitan rodent species with a wide distribution in urban and suburban-rural habitats. It is commonly found living near sources of food and water, such as garbage and drainage ditches, streams or sewers. Because of its high ability to harbor many zoonotic agents, wild Norway rats play a significant role as definitive and/or intermediate hosts for vector-borne animal and human diseases (Easterbrook et al., 2007). Zoonotic disease or zoonosis are the diseases that can be transmitted from either wild or domesticated animals to humans. About 60% of all infectious disease agents affecting humans are zoonotic in origin and most of the zoonotic reservoir species are rodents (Taylor et al., 2001). Viral, bacterial and protozoan pathogens responsible for zoonotic diseases are excreted by rodent hosts or are transferred via the bite of a bloodsucking arthropod and then enter the human body via inhalation, swallowing or skin punctures (Ostfeld and Holt, 2004). The most famous zoonotic disease associated with rodent presence is probably the infection of rodent fleas with bubonic plague caused by Yersinia pestis bacterium, resulting in many millions of casualties worldwide. 5 Endoparasites of rodents play an important role in the zoonotic cycles of many diseases, such as, schistosomiasis and angiostrongyliosis. Parasites in rats, particularly helminthes, belong to the four major groups; Nematoda, Cestoda, Trematoda and Acanthocephala. Cestode and nematode parasites in rat have been reported from all parts of the world. Vampirolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta are commonly found in rats and mice and they are potentially transmissible (Zoonosis) to man. The occurrence of H. diminuta and V. nana in certain rodents is of interest since the possibility exists that rats and mice may serve as reservoir hosts and help in dissemination of these worms to domestic animals and man causing zoonosis (Jawdat and Mahmoud, 1980). Also, rodents are suitable for hospitality of some groups of arthropods that are known as ectoparasites. They are well - adapted for living on the external surface of rodents bodies (permanent or temporary). Rats are known to harbor four groups of arthropod ectoparasites: fleas, ticks, mites and lice (Ansari, 1953; Abu-Madi, et al., 2005). Ectoparasitic arthropods as vectors of zoonotic pathogens have an important role in causing diseases such as anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis, rickettsiosis, plague, lyme borreliosis, viral encephalitis, tularemia, CCHF, zoonotic leishmaniasis, murine typhus, etc. They can also transmit disease to human by: feces, urine, saliva, milk and blood. 6 Among the ectoparasites infesting rats, the best known and most dangerous to man is the rat flea, Xenopsylla cheopis (Rothschild). This flea is the vector of Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, and Rickettsia typhi, the causative agent of murine typhus. Rickettsial agents, such as Anaplasma, Bartonella, Coxiella, Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia, have been detected by molecular tools from Egyptian ectoparasites, such as lice, fleas, and ticks (Reeves et al., 2006). 7 8 REVIEW OF LITERATURE Indo and ectoparasites associated with Rattus norvegicus Rodents (rats and mice) follow man wherever he goes carrying with them many serious zoonotic diseases (El Shazly et al., 1991). Historically, R. norvegicus has played a major role in diseases transmission. This fact is still important in today's world as it acts as a reservoir and transmits many serious diseases of man and animals like plague, hymenolepiasis, leishmaniasis, trichinosis, babesiosis and toxoplasmosis. (Louisiana, 2000). 1. A brief about Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout, 1769) Rattus norvegicus is a cosmopolitan rat species that may has many common names like brown rat, Norway rat, sewer rat or burrowing rat. Its usual habitat is away from houses, in drains or in burrows. It is fleshier than R. rattus with broad head, blunt muzzle, small eyes, short ears which, when drawn forward, do not touch each other. Fur is rough, grey brown above and whitish grey on the abdomen. The tail is shorter than the length of the body and head combined. The faecal pellets are sausage shaped and usually occur in groups. It is a commensal rat and not a true domestic rat (Nowak, 1999). Thought to have originated in northern China, R. norvegicus has now spread to all continents and is the 9 dominant rat in Europe and much of North America. It is a common pest wherever humans live particularly in urban areas and degraded environments (Banks et al., 2003). Classification of Rattus norvegicus (according to Nowak, 1999) Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Sabphylum: Vertebrata Class: Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758 Subclass: Eutheria Parker and Haswell, 1897 Infraclass: Eutheria Gill, 1872 Order: Rodentia Bowdich, 1821 Suborder: Myomorpha Brandt, 1855 Family: Muridae Illiger, 1815 Subfamily: Murinae Illiger, 1815 Genus : Rattus Fischer, 1803 Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhour, 1767) 2. Endoparasites of rats The ecology, in particularly the component community structure, of helminth parasites in small rodent population has been well documented in temperate regions of Europe (Abu- Madi et al., 1998). In contrast, and despite the wealth of information on species lists and taxonomy, there is little 01 comparable data for rodents living in tropics (Behnke et al., 2000). Rats and mice in Egypt are well-known to be the definitive hosts (reservoir hosts) of several helminthes (Arafa, 1968; Monib, 1980; Wissa, 1980). It has been known from the previous work that rats act as reservoir hosts for many parasitic helminthes
Recommended publications
  • Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?
    2010 Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What can we predict about the spread of vector-borne zoonotic diseases? Ph.D. Dissertation Megan M. Friggens School of Forestry I I I \, l " FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? by Megan M. Friggens A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science Northern Arizona University May 2010 ?Jii@~-~-u-_- Robert R. Parmenter, Ph. D. ~",l(*~ l.~ Paulette L. Ford, Ph. D. --=z:r-J'l1jU~ David M. Wagner, Ph. D. ABSTRACT FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? MEGAN M. FRIGGENS Vector-borne diseases of humans and wildlife are experiencing resurgence across the globe. I examine the dynamics of flea borne diseases through a comparative analysis of flea literature and analyses of field data collected from three sites in New Mexico: The Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, the Sandia Mountains and the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP). My objectives were to use these analyses to better predict and manage for the spread of diseases such as plague (Yersinia pestis). To assess the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on flea communities, I compiled and analyzed data from 63 published empirical studies. Anthropogenic disturbance is associated with conditions conducive to increased transmission of flea-borne diseases. Most measures of flea infestation increased with increasing disturbance or peaked at intermediate levels of disturbance. Future trends of habitat and climate change will probably favor the spread of flea-borne disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas and Flea-Borne Diseases
    International Journal of Infectious Diseases 14 (2010) e667–e676 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Infectious Diseases journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijid Review Fleas and flea-borne diseases Idir Bitam a, Katharina Dittmar b, Philippe Parola a, Michael F. Whiting c, Didier Raoult a,* a Unite´ de Recherche en Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales Emergentes, CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculte´ de Me´decine, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France b Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA c Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA ARTICLE INFO SUMMARY Article history: Flea-borne infections are emerging or re-emerging throughout the world, and their incidence is on the Received 3 February 2009 rise. Furthermore, their distribution and that of their vectors is shifting and expanding. This publication Received in revised form 2 June 2009 reviews general flea biology and the distribution of the flea-borne diseases of public health importance Accepted 4 November 2009 throughout the world, their principal flea vectors, and the extent of their public health burden. Such an Corresponding Editor: William Cameron, overall review is necessary to understand the importance of this group of infections and the resources Ottawa, Canada that must be allocated to their control by public health authorities to ensure their timely diagnosis and treatment. Keywords: ß 2010 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Flea Siphonaptera Plague Yersinia pestis Rickettsia Bartonella Introduction to 16 families and 238 genera have been described, but only a minority is synanthropic, that is they live in close association with The past decades have seen a dramatic change in the geographic humans (Table 1).4,5 and host ranges of many vector-borne pathogens, and their diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture P£R\ (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 BALTIMORE, MO., U. S. A. THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS By R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 I. The cockroach. Order Orthoptera 3 The head and the organs of ingestion 4 General structure of the head and mouth parts 4 The labrum 7 The mandibles 8 The maxillae 10 The labium 13 The hypopharynx 14 The preoral food cavity 17 The mechanism of ingestion 18 The alimentary canal 19 II. The biting lice and booklice. Orders Mallophaga and Corrodentia. 21 III. The elephant louse 30 IV. The sucking lice. Order Anoplura 31 V. The flies. Order Diptera 36 Mosquitoes. Family Culicidae 37 Sand flies. Family Psychodidae 50 Biting midges. Family Heleidae 54 Black flies. Family Simuliidae 56 Net-winged midges. Family Blepharoceratidae 61 Horse flies. Family Tabanidae 61 Snipe flies. Family Rhagionidae 64 Robber flies. Family Asilidae 66 Special features of the Cyclorrhapha 68 Eye gnats.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Phthiraptera) on Canada Geese (Branta Canadensis
    Taxonomic, Ecological and Quantitative Examination of Chewing Lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) on Canada Geese (Branta canadensis) and Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in Manitoba, Canada By Alexandra A. Grossi A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Science Department of Entomology University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba Copyright © 2013 by Alexandra A. Grossi 0 Abstract Over 19 years chewing lice data from Canada geese and mallards were collected. From Canada geese (n=300) 48,669 lice were collected, including Anaticola anseris, Anatoecus dentatus, Anatoecus penicillatus, Ciconiphilus pectiniventris, Ornithobius goniopleurus, and Trinoton anserinum. The prevalence of all lice on Canada geese was 92.3% and the mean intensity was 175.6 lice per bird. From mallards (n=269) 6,986 lice were collected which included: Anaticola crassicornis, A. dentatus, Holomenopon leucoxanthum, Holomenopon maxbeieri and Trinoton querquedulae. The prevalence of lice on mallards was 55.4% and the mean intensity was 42.0 lice per bird. Based on CO1, A. dentatus and Anatoecus icterodes were synonymised as A. dentatus. Anatoecus was found exclusively on the head, Anaticola was found predominantly on the wings, Ciconiphilus, Holomenopon and Ornithobius were observed in several body regions and Trinoton was found most often on the wings of mallards. i Acknowledgments I express my sincere thanks to my supervisor Dr. Terry Galloway for introducing me to the fascinating and complex world of chewing lice, and for his continued support and guidance throughout my thesis. I also like to thank my committee member Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blood Sucking Lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) of Croatia: Review and New Data
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 329-334 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Short Communication doi:10.3906/zoo-1510-46 The blood sucking lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) of Croatia: review and new data 1, 2 Stjepan KRČMAR *, Tomi TRILAR 1 Department of Biology, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia 2 Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Ljubljana, Slovenia Received: 17.10.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 24.06.2016 Final Version: 04.04.2017 Abstract: The present faunistic study of blood sucking lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) has resulted in the recording of the 4 species: Hoplopleura acanthopus (Burmeister, 1839); Ho. affinis (Burmeister, 1839); Polyplax serrata (Burmeister, 1839), and Haematopinus apri Goureau, 1866 newly reported for the fauna of Croatia. Thirteen species and 2 subspecies are currently known from Croatia, belonging to 6 families. Linognathidae and Haematopinidae are the best represented families, with four species each, followed by Hoplopleuridae and Polyplacidae with two species each, Pediculidae with two subspecies, and Pthiridae with one species. Blood sucking lice were collected from 18 different host species. Three taxa, one species, and two subspecies were recorded on the Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758. Two species were recorded on Apodemus agrarius (Pallas, 1771); A. sylvaticus (Linnaeus, 1758); Bos taurus Linnaeus, 1758; and Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 per host species. On the remaining 13 host species, one Anoplura species was collected. The recorded species were collected from 17 localities covering 17 fields of 10 × 10 km on the UTM grid of Croatia. Key words: Phthiraptera, Anoplura, Croatia, species list Phthiraptera have no free-living stage and represent Lice (Ferris, 1923).
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • Louse Infestation in Production Animals
    LOUSE INFESTATION IN PRODUCTION ANIMALS Dr. J.H. Vorster, BVSc, MMedVet(Path) Vetdiagnostix Veterinary Pathology Services, PO Box 13624 Cascades, 3202 Tel no: 033 342 5104 Cell no: 082 820 5030 E-mail: [email protected] Dr. P.H. Mapham, BVSc (Hon) Veterinary House Hospital, 339 Prince Alfred Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Tel no: 033 342 4698 Cell No: 082 771 3227 E-mail: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Lice infestations, or pediculosis, is common throughout the world affecting humans, fish, reptiles, birds and most mammalian species. Many of these parasites are host very host specific, and in these hosts they may also show preference to parasitize certain areas on the body. Lice are very broadly divided into two groups namely sucking lice (suborder Anoplura) and biting lice (suborder Mallophaga). Lice may in many cases be found in animals concurrently parasitized by other ectoparasites such as ticks and mites. In some instances lice may be potential vectors for viral or parasitic diseases. The prevalence and distribution patterns of lice, as with all other ectoparasites, may be influenced by a number of different factors such as changing climate, changes in husbandry systems, animal movement and changes or failures in ectoparasite control and biosecurity measures in place. Lice infestation is of particular importance in the poultry industry, salmon farming industry and in humans. This article will focus mainly on production animals in which lice infestation may be of lesser clinical significance. SPECIES OF MITES There are a number of species of lice which are of clinical importance in domestic animals. In cattle the sucking lice are Linognathus vituli (long nose sucking louse), Solenopotes capillatus (small blue sucking louse), Haematopinus eurysternus (short-nosed sucking louse), Haematopinus quadripertusus (tail louse) and Haematopinus tuberculatus (buffalo louse); and the chewing louse is Bovicola bovis.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Host and Flea Traits/Properties
    1 Oikos OIK-02178 Krasnov, B. R., Shenbrot, G. I., Khokhlova, I: S. and Degen, A. A. 2015. Trait-based and phylogenetic associations between parasites and their hosts: a case study with small mammals and fleas in the Palearctic. – Oikos doi: 10.1111/oik.02178 Appendix 1 Host and flea traits/properties: explanations and data sources Hosts Body mass Body mass is the central characteristic of a species and is commonly employed in developing hypotheses related to physiological and behavioural responses. For example, Peters (1983) presented a large number of allometric relations between various animal characteristics and body mass. From a parasite perspective, host body mass may influence parasite’s abundance (due to the obvious reasons) and host specificity. For example, a host body mass is associated with persistence of a host individual in time merely because a larger host species lives longer and, thus, represents a more predictable resource for a parasite (Peters 1983). As a result, parasite species with higher host specificity are expected to exploit large hosts, whereas small-bodied hosts are expected to be exploited mainly by generalist parasites. Indeed, our earlier findings indicated that the exploitation of large-bodied, and therefore long-lived, host species has likely promoted specialization in fleas (Krasnov et al. 2006a). Data on mean body mass of a host species were obtained from Silva and Downing (1995), Degen (1977) or PanTHERIA database (Jones et al. 2009). Basal metabolic rate Investment of host in a high basal metabolic rate (BMR) could be associated with parasitism as a compensation for a costly immune response when parasite challenges are either strong (e.g., in case of highly abundant parasite) or diverse (in case of attacks by multiple parasites) (Morand and Harvey 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Stellenbosch University Research Report 2013
    STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH REPORT 2013 Editor: Senior Director (Research and Innovation) Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch 7602 ISBN: 978-0-7972-1516-0 i CONTENTS CONTENTS i FACULTY OF AGRISCIENCES 1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS .................................................................................................. 1 AGRONOMY .................................................................................................................................. 3 ANIMAL SCIENCES ..................................................................................................................... 3 CONSERVATION ECOLOGY AND ENTOMOLOGY ................................................................ 7 FOOD SCIENCE ............................................................................................................................ 12 FOREST AND WOOD SCIENCE .................................................................................................. 15 GENETICS ..................................................................................................................................... 16 HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE ...................................................................................................... 18 PLANT PATHOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 22 SOIL SCIENCE .............................................................................................................................. 24 VITICULTURE AND OENOLOGY ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, II R.G
    In: Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, II R.G. Foottit & P.H. Adler, editors) John Wiley & Sons 2018 Chapter 17 Biodiversity of Ectoparasites: Lice (Phthiraptera) and Fleas (Siphonaptera) Terry D. Galloway Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch17 Summary This chapter addresses the two insect orders in which all known species are ectoparasites. The sucking and chewing lice (Phthiraptera) are hemimetabolous insects that spend their entire lives on the bodies of their hosts. Fleas (Siphonaptera), on the other hand, are holometabolous. The diversity of these ectoparasites is limited by the diversity of the birds and mammals available as hosts. Determining the community diversity of lice and fleas is essential to understanding ecological structure and interactions, yet offers a number of challenges to the ectoparasitologist. The chapter explores medical and veterinary importance of lice and fleas. They are more likely to be considered detrimental parasites, perhaps even a threat to conservation efforts by their very presence or by the disease agents they transmit. Perez-Osorio emphasized the importance of a more objective approach to conservation strategies by abandoning overemphasis on charismatic fauna and setting priorities in ecological management of wider biodiversity issues. When most people see a bird or mammal, they don’t look beneath the feathers or hair of that animal to see what is hidden. They see the animal at its face value, and seldom appreciate the diversity of life before them. The animal is typically a mobile menagerie, infested by external parasites and their body laden with internal parasites and pathogens.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrients Cycling, Climate, Energy Flow, Etc
    https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF S28-EnvironmentEcologyPart-1 S29-EnvironmentEcologyPart-2 S30-EnvironmentEcologyPart-3 S31-EnvironmentEcologyPart-4 S32-EnvironmentEcologyPart-5 S33-EnvironmentEcologyPart-6 Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Part - 1 Environment & Ecology Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Topics To Be Discussed I. Ecology II. Ecosystem III. Functions of Ecosystems A. Energy Flow B. Nutrient Cycles C. Ecological Succession D. Homeostasis Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF What is Environment? ➢ The environment may be defined as the surroundings or conditions in which an organism lives or operates. ➢ Every living organism is constantly interacting with its environment comprised of air, light, water, land or substratum and the various kinds of living organisms. ➢ The environment broadly includes living and non-living components. ➢ All organisms depend on their environment for survival. Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF I. Ecology Website - https://upscpdf.com findfind on on telegram telegram @unacademyplusvideos @unacademyplusvideos https://t.me/UPSC_PDF Website - https://upscpdf.com https://t.me/UPSC_PDF What is Ecology? ➢ Ecology is defined "as a scientific study of the relationship of the living organisms with each other and with their environment." ➢ The term ecology was first coined in 1869 by the German biologist Ernst Haeckel.
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvatic Plague Studies. the Vector Efficiency of Nine Species of Fleas
    [ 371 ] SYLVATIC PLAGUE STUDIES THE VECTOR EFFICIENCY OF NINE SPECIES OF FLEAS COMPARED WITH XENOPSYLLA CHEOPIS BY ALBERT LAWRENCE BURROUGHS*, M.S., PH.D. From the George Williams Hooper Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California (With Plates 4 and 5) CONTENTS PAOE PAGE Introduction .371 Discussion ....... 388 Historical 372 Mass transmissions ..... 388 Individual transmissions .... 389 Materials and methods 376 Estimation of vector efficiency 390 Selection of fleas 376 Method of determining if the variation in the Source of fleas for study .... 376 vector efficiencies obtained in two experi- Rearing the fleas ...... 376 ments is real or due to chance . 390 Maintenance of pure cultures of fleas . 377 Feeding infected fleas 377 Xenopsylla cheopis 390 Infecting the fleas 378 Diamanus montanus . .391 Echidnophaga gallinacea . 379 Malaraeus telchinum ..... 392 Experimental 379 Orchopeas sexdentatus sexdentatus . 392 Nosopsyllus fasciatus ..... 393 Xenopsylla cheopis . .379 Opisodasys nesiotus 393 Determination of the number of organisms Echidnophaga gallinacea .... 393 present in the regurgitant of a blocked flea. 381 Oropsylla idahoensis . .393 Mass transmissions with Xenopsylla cheopis . 383 Pulex irritans ...... 393 Diamanus montanus . .383 Megabothris abantis ..... 393 Nosopsyllus fasciatus . .383 Malaraeus telchinum ..... 384 Orchopeas sexdentatus sexdentatus . 385 Conclusions ....... 394 Opisodasys nesiotus . .385 Echidnophaga gallinacea . 386 Summary ........ 394 Oropsylla idahoensis 386 Pulex irritans 387 Megabothris abanlis ..... 387 References........ 395 INTRODUCTION Russian workers, as well as American, having The discovery of the existence of a large wild-rodent become aware of the widespread existence of reservoir of plague in the western United States sylvatic plague in the steppes, valleys, foothills and during the last forty years stimulated interest in the mountains encompassing thousands upon thousands study of the vectors infecting these rodent popula- of square miles, undertook a study of the vector tions.
    [Show full text]