111 1111111Lil 111 111 111 000130167
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dipterists Forum
BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel. -
Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies 02/2004-01 PPQ Jeffrey N
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Enemies of Marketing and Regulatory True Fruit Flies Programs Animal and Plant Health (Tephritidae) Inspection Service Plant Protection Jeffrey N. L. Stibick and Quarantine Psyttalia fletcheri (shown) is the only fruit fly parasitoid introduced into Hawaii capable of parasitizing the melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 4700 River Road Riverdale, MD 20737 February, 2004 Telephone: (301) 734-4406 FAX: (301) 734-8192 e-mail: [email protected] Jeffrey N. L. Stibick Introduction Introduction Fruit flies in the family Tephritidae are high profile insects among commercial fruit and vegetable growers, marketing exporters, government regulatory agencies, and the scientific community. Locally, producers face huge losses without some management scheme to control fruit fly populations. At the national and international level, plant protection agencies strictly regulate the movement of potentially infested products. Consumers throughout the world demand high quality, blemish-free produce. Partly to satisfy these demands, the costs to local, state and national governments are quite high and increasing as world trade, and thus risk, increases. Thus, fruit flies impose a considerable resource tax on participants at every level, from producer to shipper to the importing state and, ultimately, to the consumer. (McPheron & Steck, 1996) Indeed, in the United States alone, the running costs per year to APHIS, Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), (the federal Agency responsible) for maintenance of trapping systems, laboratories, and identification are in excess of US$27 million per year and increasing. This figure only accounts for a fraction of total costs throughout the country, as State, County and local governments put in their share as well as the local industry affected. -
(Other Than Moths) Attracted to Light
Insects (other than moths) attracted to light Prepared by Martin Harvey for BENHS workshop on 9 December 2017 Although light-traps go hand-in-hand with catching and recording moths, a surprisingly wide range of other insects can be attracted to light and appear in light-traps on a regular or occasional basis. The lists below show insects recorded from light-traps of various kinds, mostly from southern central England but with some additions from elsewhere in Britain, and based on my records from the early 1990s to date. Nearly all are my own records, plus a few of species that I have identified for other moth recorders. The dataset includes 2,446 records of 615 species. (See the final page of this document for a comparison with another list from Andy Musgrove.) This isn’t a rigorous survey: it represents those species that I have identified and recorded in a fairly ad hoc way over the years. I record insects in light-traps fairly regularly, but there are of course biases based on my taxonomic interests and abilities. Some groups that come to light regularly are not well-represented on this list, e.g. chironomid midges are missing despite their frequent abundance in light traps, Dung beetle Aphodius rufipes there are few parasitic wasps, and some other groups such as muscid © Udo Schmidt flies and water bugs are also under-represented. It’s possible there are errors in this list, e.g. where light-trapping has been erroneously recorded as a method for species found by day. I’ve removed the errors that I’ve found, but I might not yet have found all of them. -
Dipterists Forum
BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Rob Wolton Vice Chairman Howard Bentley Secretary Amanda Morgan Meetings Treasurer Phil Brighton Please use the Booking Form downloadable from our website Membership Sec. John Showers Field Meetings Field Meetings Sec. vacancy Now organised by several different contributors, contact the Secretary. Indoor Meetings Sec. Martin Drake Publicity Officer Erica McAlister Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Conservation Officer vacant Martin Drake [email protected] Ordinary Members Bulletin contributions Stuart Ball, Malcolm Smart, Peter Boardman, Victoria Burton, Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Tony Irwin, Martin Harvey, Chris Raper Dipterists Bulletin Editor Unelected Members Darwyn Sumner 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Tel. 0116 212 5075 [email protected] Secretary Assistant Editor Amanda Morgan Judy Webb Pennyfields, Rectory Road, Middleton, Saxmundham, Suffolk, IP17 3NW 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. [email protected] Tel. 01865 377487 [email protected] Treasurer Phil Brighton [email protected] Dipterists Digest contributions Deposits for DF organised field meetings to be sent to the Treasurer Dipterists Digest Editor Conservation Peter Chandler Robert Wolton (interim contact, whilst the post remains vacant) 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL Tel. 01225-708339 Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ [email protected] Tel. -
Scientific Publications* of James P. O'connor MRIA for the Years 1977
Scientific publications* of James P. O’Connor MRIA for the years 1977-2015. Emeritus Entomologist and former Keeper of Natural History, National Museum of Ireland – Natural History, Dublin. *book reviews are not included 495. Ashe, P., O’Connor, J. P. and Murray, D. A. (2015) A review of the distribution and ecology of Buchonomyia thienemanni Fittkau (Diptera: Chironomidae) including a first record for Russia. European Journal of Environmental Sciences 5: 5-11. 496. O’Connor, J. P., Bond, K. G. M and O’Connor, M. A. (2015) Records of Potamophylax cingulatus (Stephens) and P. latipennis (Curtis) (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) from Northern Ireland. Irish Naturalists’ Journal 34: 136-137. 497. O’Connor, J. P. and O’Connor, M. A. (2015) Three species of caddisfly (Trichoptera) new to Northern Ireland, including Apatania wallengreni McLachlan, 1871. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 151: 281-282. 498. Murray, D. A., Langton, P. H., O’Connor, J. P. and Ashe, P. (2014) Distribution records of Irish Chironomidae (Diptera): part 3 – Chironominae. Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society 39: 7-192. 499. O’Connor, J. P. and O’Connor, M. A. (2015) Additional caddisfly (Trichoptera) records from County Fermanagh including Hydroptila cornuta and Ceraclea senilis new to Northern Ireland. Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society 39: 203-208. 500. O’Connor, J. P. (2015) A catalogue and atlas of the caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Ireland. Occasional Publication of the Irish Biogeographical Society Number 11. viii + 646pp. Published by the Irish Biogeograpical Society in association with the National Museum of Ireland. List compiled 1 January 2016 and the pages are shown in reverse chronological order. -
Current Management Plan
Portsdown Hill and Portchester Common S.S.S.I. 5 year Higher Level Stewardship Management Plan for Portchester Common 2018 - 2022 Commenced February 2018 Next review Jan 2022 Contents 0.1 Preamble 4 0.2 Summary 4 DESCRIPTION 5 1.1 General information 5 1.1.1 Location 5 1.1.2 Tenure 6 1.1.3 Management Infrastructure 6 1.1.4 Compartments 6 1.2 Environmental Information 6 1.2.1 Physical 6 1.2.1.1 Climate 6 1.2.1.2 Geology 7 1.2.1.3 Soil 7 1.2.2 Biological 7 1.2.2.1 Flora 7 1.2.2.2 Fauna 8 1.2.2.2.1 Invertebrates 8 1.2.2.2.2 Vertebrates 9 1.2.2.3 Communities 9 1.2.3 Cultural 10 1.2.3.1 Archaeology/past land use 10 1.2.3.2 Past Conservation management 11 1.2.4 Environmental relationships which may have implications for management 11 1.2.4.1 General considerations of calcareous grassland Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2.4.2 Coarse grassland 11 1.2.4.2.1 Grazing - summary of ecological considerations 16 1.2.4.3 Scrub 16 1.2.4.3.1 Hedges 17 1.2.4.5 Species considerations 18 1.3 Bibliography 19 PART 2 EVALUATION AND OBJECTIVES 21 2.1 Evaluation of features 21 2.1.1 Evaluation 21 2.1.1.1 Size 21 2.1.1.2 Diversity 21 2.1.1.3 Potential 21 2.1.1.4 Intrinsic value 22 2.1.3 Summary of Important Features 22 2.1.4 Long-term /Ideal Management Objectives 23 2.2 Factors influencing the achievement of long term management objectives 23 2.2.1 Owners objectives Error! Bookmark not defined. -
FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH of the UNITED STATES (Diptera: Tephritidae)
1.0 1/11/2.5 2.2 1.1 1.1 111111.25 11111 1.4 111111.6 11111 1.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A NATIDNAL BUREAU OF STANDAROS-1963-A i 6~~ ~_. - (; ~> I' \, ," '" <> Q -i'. .D « 0" ',' '" p P 'J -:. y~.' /'.',,": :$, ,/ -l,; .C ~ r;;;:. ';. ,~ .., .. , {~ 0 , FRUIT FLY GENERA SOLJTH OF TH E UNITED STATES (Diptera: Tephritidae) by RICHARD H. FOOTE F\ UNITED STATES TECHNICAL PREPARED BY I\U.~), DEPARTMENT OF BULLETIN SCIENCE AND ~ AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1600 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION ABSTRACT Foote, Richard H. 1980. Fruit fly genera south of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1600,79 pp. The 88 genera of fruit flies in Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America are discussed. Keys to all genera are pre sented, and a synonymy, diagnosis, and discussion of each genus follow. Included for each genus is information about its distribution, its rela tionship to other genera, its composition in terms of the species belong ingto it, aids to its recognition, and references for identifying its species. Several diagnostic characteristics and the wing of at least one species in almost every genus have been illustrated. Four genera, previously re garded as valid, have been synonymized with others, and three addi tional genera, long recorded from the region, are shown not to occur in the New World or to belong to other fly families. Fruit flies comprise the most economically important family of plant-inhabiting Diptera, consid ering the potential for agricultu"'al damage by species of such genera as Anast-repha, Ceratitis, Dacu.s, andRhagoletis. -
FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH of the UNITED STATES (Díptera: Tephritidae)
- lAg84Te FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES (Díptera: Tephritidae) by RICHARD H. FOOTE I Ç3 ¿1 ¿¡Siv UNITED STATES TECHNICAL PREPARED BY UU*) DEPARTMENT OF BULLETIN SCIENCE AND ""iS^ AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1600 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION FRUIT FLY GENERA SOUTH OF THE UNITED STATES (Díptera: Tephritidae) by RICHARD H. FOOTE y r. ^ ^¡S^v UNITED STATES TECHNICAL PREPARED BY (i4É! DEPARTMENT OF BULLETIN SCIENCE AND '^^^' AGRICULTURE NUMBER 1600 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION 1 ABSTRACT Foote, Richard H. 1980. Fruit fly genera south of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1600,79 pp. The 88 genera of fruit flies in Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America are discussed. Keys to all genera are pre- sented, and a synonymy, diagnosis, and discussion of each genus follow. Included for each genus is information about its distribution, its rela- tionship to other genera, its composition in terms of the species belong- ing to it, aids to its recognition, and references for identifying its species. Several diagnostic characteristics and the wing of at least one species in almost every genus have been illustrated. Four genera, previously re- garded as valid, have been synonymized with others, and three addi- tional genera, long recorded from the region, are shown not to occur in the New World or to belong to other fly families. Fruit flies comprise the most economically important family of plant-inhabiting Diptera, consid- ering the potential for agricultural damage by species of such genera as Anastrepha, Ceratitis, Dacus, and Rhagoletis. Used in conjunction with my catalog of Tephritidae published in 1967, this bulletin provides a means of identifying about two-thirds of the more than 600 species of fruit flies known to occur south of Texas and Florida. -
1 Invasive Species and Biological Control
Bio Control 01 - 16 made-up 14/11/01 3:16 pm Page 1 Chapter 1 1 1 Invasive Species and Biological Control D.J. Parker and B.D. Gill Introduction ballast, favouring aquatic invaders (Bright, 1999). While the rate of introductions has Invasive alien species are those organisms increased greatly over the past 100 years that, when accidentally or intentionally (Sailer, 1983), the period 1981–2000 has introduced into a new region or continent, seen political and technological changes rapidly expand their ranges and exert a that may unleash an even greater wave of noticeable impact upon the resident flora invasive species. The collapse of the for- or fauna of their new environment. From a mer Soviet Union and China’s interest in plant quarantine perspective, invasive joining world trade have opened up new species are typically pests that cause prob- markets in Asia. These vast areas, once iso- lems after entering a country undetected in lated, can now serve as source populations commercial goods or in the personal bag- for additional cold-tolerant pests, e.g. the gage of travellers. Under the International Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), ‘pests’ glabripennis (Motschulsky), and the lesser are defined as ‘any species, strain or bio- Japanese tsugi borer, Callidiellum type of plant, animal or pathogenic agent rufipenne (Motschulsky). Examples of a injurious to plants or plant products’, few insects introduced to Canada since while ‘quarantine pests’ are ‘pests of eco- 1981 include apple ermine moth, nomic importance to the area endangered Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller, European thereby and not yet present there, or pre- pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.), sent but not widely distributed and being leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella officially controlled’ (FAO, 1999). -
AVIS Et Rapport De L'anses Relatifs À "Demande De Réalisation D'une
Hiérarchisation des mouches Tephritidae les plus menaçantes pour les DOM Zone : La Réunion Avis de l’Anses Rapport d’expertise collective Décembre 2014 Édition scientifique Hiérarchisation des mouches Tephritidae les plus menaçantes pour les DOM Zone : La Réunion Avis de l’Anses Rapport d’expertise collective Décembre 2014 Édition scientifique Avis de l’Anses Saisine n° « 2012-SA-0162 » Le directeur général Maisons-Alfort, le 19 décembre 2014 AVIS de l’Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail relatif à « Demande de réalisation d’une hiérarchisation des mouches Tephritidae les plus menaçantes pour les zones tropicales ultra-marines et notamment La Réunion» L’Anses met en œuvre une expertise scientifique indépendante et pluraliste. L’Anses contribue principalement à assurer la sécurité sanitaire dans les domaines de l’environnement, du travail et de l’alimentation et à évaluer les risques sanitaires qu’ils peuvent comporter. Elle contribue également à assurer d’une part la protection de la santé et du bien-être des animaux et de la santé des végétaux et d’autre part l’évaluation des propriétés nutritionnelles des aliments. Elle fournit aux autorités compétentes toutes les informations sur ces risques ainsi que l’expertise et l’appui scientifique technique nécessaires à l’élaboration des dispositions législatives et réglementaires et à la mise en œuvre des mesures de gestion du risque (article L.1313-1 du code de la santé publique). Ses avis sont rendus publics. L’Anses a été saisie le 02 juillet 2012 par la Direction Générale de l’Alimentation du Ministère en charge de l’agriculture pour la réalisation de l’expertise suivante : Demande de réalisation d’une hiérarchisation des mouches Tephritidae les plus menaçantes pour les zones tropicales ultra- marines et notamment La Réunion. -
An Introduction to the Immature Stages of British Flies
Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2013 Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 10, Part 14 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUP ARIA AND PUPAE K. G. V. Smith ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Handbooks for the Vol. 10, Part 14 Identification of British Insects Editors: W. R. Dolling & R. R. Askew AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUPARIA AND PUPAE By K. G. V. SMITH Department of Entomology British Museum (Natural History) London SW7 5BD 1989 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON The aim of the Handbooks is to provide illustrated identification keys to the insects of Britain, together with concise morphological, biological and distributional information. Each handbook should serve both as an introduction to a particular group of insects and as an identification manual. Details of handbooks currently available can be obtained from Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. Cover illustration: egg of Muscidae; larva (lateral) of Lonchaea (Lonchaeidae); floating puparium of Elgiva rufa (Panzer) (Sciomyzidae). To Vera, my wife, with thanks for sharing my interest in insects World List abbreviation: Handbk /dent. Br./nsects. © Royal Entomological Society of London, 1989 First published 1989 by the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. -
16. Biodiversity
16. Biodiversity Purpose of the Assessment 16.1 This assessment is based on the Proposed Development as set out at Chapter 5: The Proposed Development and as shown on the Parameters Plan (Appendix 5.1). It accordingly presents an ecological impact assessment (EcIA) following the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment published by the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (Ref 16.1). 16.2 In particular, designated sites, habitats and species are noted; baseline ecological conditions are described; potential impacts on ecological features are predicted and assessed (including those due to direct loss of habitat, and those likely to arise in connection with each stage of development from site-clearance and remediation, through various construction phases, to occupation and use of the completed development and decommissioning); proposed mitigation and compensation measures are outlined; and residual impacts after mitigation are then described and assessed. Cumulative impacts arising from interaction with other developments in the area, and intra-relationships, are also addressed. 16.3 This chapter of the Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) considers ecology relevant to the Order Limits (Potential Development Area (PDA)) (i.e. the Main Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) Site, the Junction 15a (J15a) Site; and Minor Highway Works) as shown in the Order Limits plan in Appendix 5.1. The Main SRFI Site covers approximately 291 ha and the J15a site approximately 70 ha. 16.4 This chapter also considers the potential impact of climate change upon ecological resources and receptors in accordance with the future UKCP09 climatic conditions as set out in Chapter 23:Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation of this PEIR.