Animal Evolution: the Enigmatic Phylum Placozoa Revisited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Animal Evolution: the Enigmatic Phylum Placozoa Revisited Current Biology Vol 15 No 1 R26 networks and have a very low turnover in 12. Rabut, G., Lenart, P., and Ellenberg, J. formation in Aspergillus is coupled to live mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 154, (2004). Dynamics of nuclear pore tubulin movement into the nucleus. Mol. 71–84. complex organization through the cell Biol. Cell 14, 2192–2200. 9. Rabut, G., Doye, V., and Ellenberg, J. cycle. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 314–321. 17. Lenart, P., Rabut, G., Daigle, N., Hand, (2004). Mapping the dynamic 13. Goldberg, M.W., Rutherford, S.A., A.R., Terasaki, M., and Ellenberg, J. organization of the nuclear pore complex Hughes, M., Cotter, L.A., Bagley, S., (2003). Nuclear envelope breakdown in inside single living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, Kiseleva, E., Allen, T.D., and Clarke, P.R. starfish oocytes proceeds by partial NPC 1114–1121. (2000). Ran Alters Nuclear Pore Complex disassembly followed by a rapidly 10. Walther, T.C., Alves, A., Pickersgill, H., Conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 300, 519–529. spreading fenestration of nuclear Loiodice, I., Hetzer, M., Galy, V., 14. Feldherr, C.M., Akin, D., and Cohen, R.J. membranes. J. Cell Biol. 160, 1055–1068. Hulsmann, B.B., Kocher, T., Wilm, M., (2001). Regulation of functional nuclear Allen, T., et al. (2003). The conserved pore size in fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 114, Nup107–160 complex is critical for Department of Biochemistry and 4621–4627. nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell 15. De Souza, C.P., Horn, K.P., Masker, K., Molecular Biology, Baylor College of 113, 195–206. Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, 11. Harel, A., Orjalo, A.V., Vincent, T., and Osmani, S.A. (2003). The Lachish-Zalait, A., Vasu, S., Shah, S., SONB(NUP98) nucleoporin interacts with Texas 77030, USA. Zimmerman, E., Elbaum, M., and Forbes, the NIMA kinase in Aspergillus nidulans. E-mail: [email protected] D.J. (2003). Removal of a single pore Genetics 165, 1071–1081. subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei 16. Ovechkina, Y., Maddox, P., Oakley, C.E., devoid of nuclear pores. Mol. Cell 11, Xiang, X., Osmani, S.A., Salmon, E.D., DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.36.29 853–864. and Oakley, B.R. (2003). Spindle Animal Evolution: The Enigmatic upper and a lower epithelium separated by the ‘fiber cell’ layer Phylum Placozoa Revisited (Figure 1B). The latter has a syncytial organization and its contractile properties are often A recent report of high levels of genetic variation between strains of assumed to be responsible for the Trichoplax adhaerens challenges the traditional view that the phylum amoeba-like changes in shape. Placozoa comprises only one species. At the morphological level, The upper layer consists of placozoans are amongst the simplest extant animals, but molecular monociliated ‘cover’ cells, evidence suggests that they may have more complex origins. whereas two cell types make up the lower epithelium — gland David J. Miller1* and [3], all that is known about it is cells, which are non-ciliated and Eldon E. Ball2 based on aquarium cultures. thought to secrete digestive Although T. adhaerens was until enzymes, and ciliated ‘cylinder’ Often described as the simplest now the sole recognized species cells that may be adhesive and known animal, the unassuming in the phylum Placozoa, the levels capable of resorbing digestion marine placozoan Trichoplax of molecular heterogeneity products [1]. Little is known about adhaerens is one of a handful of reported by Voigt et al. [4] the natural diet of Trichoplax, ‘lower’ metazoans that have so far reported in a recent issue of although it is assumed to consist defied being pigeonholed. Current Biology imply that what of micro-algae and organic The history of Trichoplax and has previously been considered detritus. In culture, they have its relatives has the elements of a one species may actually be been maintained for years on a scientific mystery story several. Cryptic molecular diet of Cryptomonas, which are (summarized in [1]). In 1971, Karl diversity thus underlies the more or less dissolved upon Grell [2] formally described a new apparently uniform morphology of contact with the gland cells. The Phylum, the Placozoa, to placozoans and, as the majority of morphology of the cylinder cells accommodate two species that the cell biological studies to date indicates that they are responsible had been reported a hundred have been based on a single for uptake of the dissolved years earlier. These were isolate from the Red Sea, this nutrients. Trichoplax sometimes originally greeted with excitement study highlights the need for elevate their center from the as ‘living fossils’ representing the further research on this enigmatic substrate to form one or more ancestral animal morphology. group of animals. digestive bags, and on glass However, the suggestion that substrates they frequently leave they were, in fact, modified Trichoplax Biology behind an area that is cleared of cnidarian larvae prompted a loss In culture, individual Trichoplax everything edible. of interest for the next fifty years. are flat and irregular disc-like One of the species upon which animals a few millimeters in Is Trichoplax Secondarily Simple? Placozoa was founded, diameter (environmental isolates Although it would be hard to Treptoplax reptans, has never are often smaller) and 10–15 µm imagine a simpler animal than been seen since its original thick (Figure 1A). Although Trichoplax, it is unclear whether it description, and is assumed not molecular studies point to had more complex ancestors, or to exist; T. adhaerens, on the additional cellular complexity (see whether its simplicity reflects its other hand, appears to be widely below), Trichoplax has been humble origins. Trichoplax has distributed and relatively common repeatedly described as some of the morphological in warm marine environments [1]. comprising just four cell types characteristics that are However, other than field surveys arranged in three layers — an considered to define higher Dispatch R27 animals, but not others. For example, the ectodermal cell junctions of Placozoa are similar to those of higher animals, but placozoan epithelia differ by their lack of a basal lamina. Grell’s original description of the phylum assumed a basal position amongst metazoans and implied that its simplicity is ancestral. However, according to recent molecular and morphological phylogenies [5,6] the Placozoa branch off after the ctenophores and sometimes the cnidarians, both of which are morphologically much more complex. Nevertheless, the issue is still controversial (e.g., [7]). If Trichoplax is secondarily simple, then it has lost typical animal features such as a nervous system, and there are intriguing hints that this may be the case. Only a few genes have been cloned from Trichoplax, but amongst these are several that are expressed in cnidarian nervous systems. In Trichoplax, these genes are expressed in small cells that are relatively evenly spaced in the marginal Figure 1. Trichoplax adhaerens, a simple amoeboid metazoan. zone and which do not appear to (A) A top view of an FITC-stained specimen (diameter about 1 mm) reveals the shiny spheres characteristically found in the upper epithelium as white dots. Reproduced correspond to any of the four with permission from [8]. (B) The four classically recognized cell types of Trichoplax: known cell types. For example, cover cells of the upper epithelium, fiber cells of the intermediate layer, and cylinder the placozoan homeobox gene cells and gland cells of the lower layer (modified after [1]). (C) Secp1, which encodes a Trox2 (Figure 1D) is clearly related putative small secreted protein, is expressed uniformly in the marginal zone, as shown to the Gsx/ind genes, which in the top view (upper panel), and in all three layers, as shown in the transverse function in dorso-ventral section (lower panel). Reproduced with permission from [14]. (D) The Gsx-type homeobox gene, Trox-2 is also expressed in the marginal zone, but in discrete cells patterning of the central nervous (unpublished photo, courtesy of B. Schierwater). (E) Another homeobox gene, Not, is system in higher animals and to expressed in folds in intact animals, as shown here, as well as in regenerating cnox2-Am from the cnidarian wounds. Reproduced with permission from [18]. (F) Birefringent granules, possibly of Acropora millepora, which is also calcitic calcium carbonate, are also limited to the marginal zone. Reproduced with differentially expressed in the permission from [13]. (G) The T-box transcription factor Brachyury is expressed in a nervous system [8–10]. Likewise few cells or groups of cells in the marginal outgrowth zones of large Trichoplax individuals. Reproduced with permission from [14]. Pax-B type genes are expressed in the Trichoplax marginal zone and in the cnidarian nervous example produces the calcium are lacking, it is unclear whether system [8,11]. Intriguingly, cells in carbonate skeleton in corals. the limits of the ‘marginal zone’ this marginal region also appear However, it is difficult to relate are the same for all genes. to express the neuropeptide this apparent similarity to the RFamide [12], which is the most overall structure of Trichoplax. The Placozoan Life Cycle — Are abundant neurotransmitter in Moreover, expression data for We Missing Something? cnidarians. These expression Brachyury genes cannot easily be In culture, placozoan reproduction patterns suggest a possible accommodated by the idea of a is overwhelmingly asexual and sensory function and that the correspondence between the occurs by binary fission. However, marginal zone of Trichoplax might ectoderm and marginal zone, as as Trichoplax cultures reach high correspond to the ectoderm of they are expressed in the densities and begin to degenerate, cnidarians. The presence in this Trichoplax marginal zone (Figure oocytes are developed. Under layer of birefringent granules 1G), but in the presumptive such conditions, small non- (Figure 1F) of what appears to be endoderm of cnidarians [14,15].
Recommended publications
  • Buzzle – Zoology Terms – Glossary of Biology Terms and Definitions Http
    Buzzle – Zoology Terms – Glossary of Biology Terms and Definitions http://www.buzzle.com/articles/biology-terms-glossary-of-biology-terms-and- definitions.html#ZoologyGlossary Biology is the branch of science concerned with the study of life: structure, growth, functioning and evolution of living things. This discipline of science comprises three sub-disciplines that are botany (study of plants), Zoology (study of animals) and Microbiology (study of microorganisms). This vast subject of science involves the usage of myriads of biology terms, which are essential to be comprehended correctly. People involved in the science field encounter innumerable jargons during their study, research or work. Moreover, since science is a part of everybody's life, it is something that is important to all individuals. A Abdomen: Abdomen in mammals is the portion of the body which is located below the rib cage, and in arthropods below the thorax. It is the cavity that contains stomach, intestines, etc. Abscission: Abscission is a process of shedding or separating part of an organism from the rest of it. Common examples are that of, plant parts like leaves, fruits, flowers and bark being separated from the plant. Accidental: Accidental refers to the occurrences or existence of all those species that would not be found in a particular region under normal circumstances. Acclimation: Acclimation refers to the morphological and/or physiological changes experienced by various organisms to adapt or accustom themselves to a new climate or environment. Active Transport: The movement of cellular substances like ions or molecules by traveling across the membrane, towards a higher level of concentration while consuming energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A
    s l a m m a y t T i M S N v I i A e G t A n i p E S r a A C a C E H n T M i THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity The Humane Society of the United State s/ World Society for the Protection of Animals 2009 1 1 1 2 0 A M , n o t s o g B r o . 1 a 0 s 2 u - e a t i p s u S w , t e e r t S h t u o S 9 8 THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A. Rose, E.C.M. Parsons, and Richard Farinato, 4th edition Editors: Naomi A. Rose and Debra Firmani, 4th edition ©2009 The Humane Society of the United States and the World Society for the Protection of Animals. All rights reserved. ©2008 The HSUS. All rights reserved. Printed on recycled paper, acid free and elemental chlorine free, with soy-based ink. Cover: ©iStockphoto.com/Ying Ying Wong Overview n the debate over marine mammals in captivity, the of the natural environment. The truth is that marine mammals have evolved physically and behaviorally to survive these rigors. public display industry maintains that marine mammal For example, nearly every kind of marine mammal, from sea lion Iexhibits serve a valuable conservation function, people to dolphin, travels large distances daily in a search for food. In learn important information from seeing live animals, and captivity, natural feeding and foraging patterns are completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polyp and the Medusa Life on the Move
    The Polyp and the Medusa Life on the Move Millions of years ago, unlikely pioneers sparked a revolution. Cnidarians set animal life in motion. So much of what we take for granted today began with Cnidarians. FROM SHAPE OF LIFE The Polyp and the Medusa Life on the Move Take a moment to follow these instructions: Raise your right hand in front of your eyes. Make a fist. Make the peace sign with your first and second fingers. Make a fist again. Open your hand. Read the next paragraph. What you just did was exhibit a trait we associate with all animals, a trait called, quite simply, movement. And not only did you just move your hand, but you moved it after passing the idea of movement through your brain and nerve cells to command the muscles in your hand to obey. To do this, your body needs muscles to move and nerves to transmit and coordinate movement, whether voluntary or involuntary. The bit of business involved in making fists and peace signs is pretty complex behavior, but it pales by comparison with the suites of thought and movement associated with throwing a curve ball, walking, swimming, dancing, breathing, landing an airplane, running down prey, or fleeing a predator. But whether by thought or instinct, you and all animals except sponges have the ability to move and to carry out complex sequences of movement called behavior. In fact, movement is such a basic part of being an animal that we tend to define animalness as having the ability to move and behave.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Animals Sponges and Placozoa the Twig of the Tree That Is the Animals the Tour Begins
    Animal Kingdom Simple animals Sponges and placozoa Tom Hartman Asymmetry www.tuatara9.co.uk Animal form and function 1 Module 111121 2 The twig of the tree that is the animals Animals All other animals Animals Sponges Choanoflagellates Choanoflagellates Fungi Fungi 3 4 All other animals Animals (bilateralia) Radiata Sponges Choanoflagellates Fungi The tour begins 5 6 1 Animal Kingdom The Phylum Quirky phyla • In the standard Linnean system (and taxonomic systems • There are 39 animal phyla (+/- 10!) based on it), a Phylum is the taxonomic category between Kingdom and Class. • The Micrognathozoa were • A phylum is a major ranking of organisms, defined discovered in 2000 (1 species)in according to the most basic body-parts shared by that springs in Greenland. group. But we must include the creatures and their • Xenoturbellida removed from the common ancestor. molluscs and moved to the – Chordata (animals with a notochord - vertebrates and others), – Arthropoda (animals with a jointed exoskeleton) dueterostomes when DNA – Mollusca (animals with a shell-secreting mantle), evidence was discounted due to – Angiosperma (flowering plants), and so on. what it had eaten! – A number of traditional Phyla - e.g. Protozoa, possibly Arthropoda - • Cycliophora discovered on the are probably invalid (polyphyletic). lips of lobsters in 1995. 7 8 The Class Our journey • In the Linnean system (and taxonomic systems Kingdom Group Phylum based on it), a Class is the taxonomic category Porifera between Phylum and Order. Placozoa • A class is a major group of organisms, e.g. Cnidaria Mammalia, Gastropoda, Insecta, etc that Parazoa Ctenophora contains a large number of different Radiata Platyhelminthes sublineages, but have shared characteristics in Animalia Protostome Rotifera common e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • FAU Institutional Repository
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©1999 Academic Press. This manuscript is an author version with the final publication available and may be cited as: Young, C. M. (1999). Marine invertebrate larvae. In E. Knobil & J. D. Neill (eds.), Encyclopedia of Reproduction, 3. (pp. 89-97). London, England, and San Diego, CA: Academic Press. --------1111------- Marine Invertebrate Larvae Craig M. Young Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution 1. What Is a Larva? metamorphOSiS Morphological and physiological changes II. The Production of Larvae that occur during the transition from the larval phase to iII. Larval forms and Diversity the juvenile phase: often coincides with settlement in ben­ IV. Larval Feeding and Nutrition thic species. V. Larval Orientation, Locomotion, Dispersal, and mixed development A developmental mode that includes a Mortality brooded or encapsulated embryonic stage as well as a free­ VI. Larval Settlement and Metamorphosis swimming larval stage. VlI. Ecological and Evolutionary Significance of Larvae planktotrophic larva A feeding larva that obtains at least part VlIl. Economic and Medical Importance of Larvae of its nutritional needs from either particulate or dissolved exogenous sources. Planktotrophic larvae generally hatch from small, transparent eggs. GLOSSARY settlement The permanent transition of a larva from the plankton to the benthos. In sessile organisms, settlement atrochal larva A uniformly ciliated larva (cilia not arranged is marked by adhesion to the substratum. It is often closely in distinct bands). associated with metamorphosis and may involve habitat se­ competent larva A larva that is physiologically and morpho­ lection.
    [Show full text]
  • Eukaryote Cell Biology - Michelle Gehringer
    FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOCHEMISTRY, CELL BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS – Vol. II - Eukaryote Cell Biology - Michelle Gehringer EUKARYOTE CELL BIOLOGY Michelle Gehringer Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa Keywords: cell theory, cell diversity, eukaryote cell structure, nucleus, chromatin, DNA, organelles, mitochondria, chloroplasts, transcription, RNA, translation, ribosomes, cell cycle, interphase, mitosis, meiosis, signal transduction, growth regulation, cancer, oncogenesis. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The first cell 2. Origin of Eukaryotes 3. Cellular differentiation in multicellular organisms 3.1. Plants 3.2. Animals 4. Eukaryotic cell structure 5. Organization of eukaryotic cells 5.1. Plasma membrane 5.2. Extracellular matrices 5.3. Protein synthesis and transport 5.4. Cytoskeleton and movement 5.5. Nucleus 5.5.1 Genomes 5.5.2 Gene expression 5.5.3 Maintaining the genome 5.6. Organelles 6. The cell cycle 6.1. Mitosis 6.2. Meiosis 7. Regulation of cell growth 7.1. Signal transduction 7.2. Programmed cell death 7.3. CancerUNESCO – EOLSS 8. Experimental Models 8.1. Yeast SAMPLE CHAPTERS 8.2. Arabidopsis 8.3. Drosophila 8.4. The mouse 8.5. Cell culture 8.6. Separation of cellular contents 8.7. Tracing biochemical pathways 9. Future Investigations Glossary Bibliography ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOCHEMISTRY, CELL BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS – Vol. II - Eukaryote Cell Biology - Michelle Gehringer Biographical Sketch Summary Cells form the basic unit of life on our planet. They are well organized systems which perform all the essential tasks of eating, respiring, replicating and excreting waste products. The first cells, which are thought to have evolved about 3.8 billion years ago, much resembled present day prokaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning List 1. Eukaryotic Cells (Plant and Animal Cells) Have a Cell Membrane, Cytoplasm and Genetic Material Enclosed in a Nucleus
    Learning List 1. Eukaryotic cells (plant and animal cells) have a cell membrane, cytoplasm and genetic material enclosed in a nucleus. 2. Prokaryotic cells contain cytoplasm, cell membrane and a cell wall. The genetic material is not in a nucleus but a single loop. 3. Prokaryotic cells can contain plasmids. 4. Prokaryotic cells are much smaller than eukaryotic cells. 5. Animal cells contain nucleus, cytoplasm, cell membrane, mitochondria and ribosomes. 6. Plant cells also contain chloroplasts, a vacuole and a cell wall. 7. Plant cell walls are made of cellulose. 8. Most animal cells differentiate at an early stage (become specialised) 9. Most plant cells retain the ability to differentiate throughout their life. 10. Cells can be specialised to carry out a particular function e.g. sperm cells, nerve cells, muscle cells, root hair cells, xylem and phloem cells. Cells All living things are made of ________________. Cells can either be ____________________ or ________________________. Plants and animal cells are _________________________. Label the diagram of a plant and animal cell. Compare the structure of a plant and animal cell Bacteria are _______________________ cells. Label the diagram of a bacterial cell. Complete the Venn Diagram to compare eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells Eukaryotic Prokaryotic Function of cell organelles Learning List – Microscopes 1. Light microscopes use light and lenses to form an image of a specimen. 2. Light microscopes are used to se nuclei, chloroplasts, cell wall, cell membrane and mitochondria. Electron microscopes use electrons to form an image. 3. Stains are used to make the specimen visible. 4. Electron microscopes have a higher magnification.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Models of Fungal Infection: Critical Systems in Development Of
    Animal Models of Fungal Infection Critical Systems in Development of New Antifungal Agents Thomas J. Walsh, MD, PhD (hon), FAAM, FIDSA, FECMM, FAAAS Founding Director, Transplantation-Oncology Infectious Diseases Program Chief, Infectious Diseases Translational Research Laboratory Professor of Medicine, Pediatrics, and Microbiology & Immunology Weill Cornell Medical Center of Cornell University Attending Physician, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Hospital for Special Surgery Adjunct Professor of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Disclosures/Disclaimers • Disclosures: Dr. Walsh has received grants for experimental and clinical antimicrobial pharmacology and therapeutics to his institution from Allergan, Amplyx, Astellas, Lediant, Medicines Company, Merck, Scynexis, Tetraphase, and Viosera and has served as consultant to Amplyx, Astellas, Allergan, ContraFect, Gilead, Lediant, Medicines Company, Merck, Methylgene, Pfizer, and Scynexis • Disclaimers: The views expressed in this talk represent my opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Weill Cornell Medicine or those of the FDA. Background • Animal model systems are a critical component of the process of discovery and development of new antifungal agents for treatment and prevention of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). • Models of IFDs in murine, rat, guinea pigs, and rabbits have been developed and studied for development of new systemic antifungal agents. • We will review the conceptual, scientific, and regulatory framework for utilizing these models, cite specific examples of their application, and discuss their predictability for clinical trials. Objectives • Review role of laboratory animal model systems in development of new antifungal agents. • Assess the predictability of these models for predicting outcome in clinical trials.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Eukaryotic Animal Cell by Kayla Underwood General
    Description of the Eukaryotic Animal Cell By Kayla Underwood General Description The animal cell is the basic unit of life in the animal body. Cells are the building blocks of more complicated structures and they are specialized to carry out specialized functions. Cells are highly organized structures and in order to be successful in carrying out its functions they must be able to separate its contents from the external environment. Eukaryotic cell size is limited and it ranges from ten to one-hundred micrometers in diameter. The eukaryotic animal cell has a plasma membrane that surrounds the cell along with internal structures that are referred to as organelles. Organelles are specialized to carry out specific functions such as converting energy to usable forms, synthesizing compounds, and manufacturing structures that are essential to function and reproduction. Major Structures As figure 1 indicates, the major structures of the eukaryotic animal cell are the plasma membrane, the Golgi complex, the nucleus, which contains the nucleolus, a nuclear envelope, and nuclear pores, the endoplasmic reticulum (rough and smooth), lysosomes, mitochondria, peroxizomes, microfilaments, microtubules, cilia, and the centrioles. Each structure is described below. Figure 1: Anatomy of the Animal Cell Source: © 1995-2005 by Michael W. Davidson and the Florida State University. Retrieved May 4, 2005 from http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/cells/animalcell.html Plasma Membrane A structure that surrounds all cells with the function of separating the cells contents from the outside environment. The plasma membrane serves as a selective barrier in that it only allows certain exchanges to take place between the internal area of the cell and the outside environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Evolution: Trichoplax, Trees, and Taxonomic Turmoil
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Dispatch R1003 Dispatches Animal Evolution: Trichoplax, Trees, and Taxonomic Turmoil The genome sequence of Trichoplax adhaerens, the founding member of the into the same major classes (C, E/F enigmatic animal phylum Placozoa, has revealed that a surprising level of and B) as do those described from genetic complexity underlies its extremely simple body plan, indicating either Amphimedon [4]. Consistent with that placozoans are secondarily simple or that there is an undiscovered a more derived position, however, morphologically complex life stage. Trichoplax has a number of Antp superclass Hox genes that are absent David J. Miller1 and Eldon E. Ball2 but no other axial differentiation, from the sponge Amphimedon. resembling an amoeba. Grell [3] who These include the ‘ParaHox’ gene With the recent or imminent release formally described these common but Trox-2 [5] and the extended Hox of the whole genome sequences of inconspicuous marine organisms as family gene Not [6] known from a number of key animal species, this belonging to a new phylum, assumed previous work. Particularly intriguing is an exciting time for the ‘evo-devo’ that their simplicity is primary, and is the discovery in Trichoplax of many community. In the last twelve months, that they therefore must represent genes associated with neuroendocrine whole genome analyses of the a key stage in animal evolution. This function across the Bilateria; in cnidarian Nematostella vectensis, view is still held by several prominent common with Amphimedon [7], many the choanoflagellate Monosiga Trichoplax biologists, but has always elements of the post-synaptic scaffold brevicollis and the cephalochordate been contentious; the view that it is are present, but so too are channel Branchiostoma floridae (commonly derived from a more complex ancestor and receptor proteins not known from known as amphioxus) have been has recently been gaining momentum sponges.
    [Show full text]