DOCSLIB.ORG

CP26870E.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CP26870E.Pdf Standardized form for reporting international transfers of conventional arms (exports )a EXPORTS Report of international conventional arms transfers (according to United Nations General Assembly resolutions 46/36 L and 58/54) Reporting country: United States of America National point of contact: Office of International Security Negotiations, Bureau of Arms Control, U.S. Department of State Phone: 1-202-647-7909 Fax: 1-202-647-8746 E-Mail: [email protected] (Organization, Division/Section, telephone, fax, e-mail) (FOR GOVERNMENTAL USE ONLY) Calendar year: 2004 A B C D b E b REMARKS c Category (I-VII) Final importer Number State of origin Intermediate Description Comments on the State(s) of items (if not exporter) location of item transfer (if any) I. Battle tanks II. Armoured combat Canada 1 Light AV w/ ATGM vehicles 2 Light AV 25 M113 kits, APC Egypt 30 M577A2 Italy 1 AAV7A1 Jordan 42 M113A2 5 M577A2 Rep. of Korea 8 AAV7A1 Saudi Arabia 94 LAV-aslt Tunisia 6 M577A2 Turkey 103 AIFV kits III. Large-calibre Egypt 8 M109A2 artillery 12 MLRS systems Rep. of Korea 7 MLRS Saudi Arabia 4 M109A5 IV. Combat aircraft Brazil 3 P-3A Colombia 3 VTOL OV-10 Greece 5 F-16C 2 F-16D Israel 21 F-16D Rep. of Korea 2 P-3B Singapore 6 F-16 UAE 8 F-16 V. Attack German 2 MD-600 helicopters Greece 2 S-70B Jordan 1 S-70A Pakistan 12 AH-1F Singapore 4 Bell 412EP Turkey 2 MD-600 VI. Warships VII. Missiles and a) Australia 12 Naval SAM missile launchers d Canada 49 Sea Sparrow 3 RGM-8L Egypt 27 RGM-84L Denmark 14 Sea Sparrow 32 LAU-129A/A Germany 93 Airframe Missile Block 14 Standard Missile Israel 20 LAU-129A/A 43 AIM 120C Italy 68 AIM 120C Japan 66 Vertical launchers, AA missiles, AS missiles Netherlands 24 Standard Missile Oman 8 AGM-84L 29 LAU-129A/A 4 AIM 120C Rep. of Korea 96 Standard Missile 4 MK41 Saudi Arabia 46 LAU-128A/A 68 AIM 120C Sweden 1 AGM-66 G2 Thailand 12 LAU-129A/A UAE 20 AGM-65G2 3 AGM-65G 82 AIM 120C United Kingdom 90 UK Command Launch Kits Trident Missile 2 Limas Launcher 1 reloader b) Italy 146 Gripstock Ctrl Grp GM Lnch Note: In addition, during Calendar Year 2004, transfers to Taiwan took place as follows: Category VI (Warships) 4 x DDG Category VII (Missiles/Missile Launchers) 20 x RGM-84L 2 x AGM-65G 40 x AGM-65G2 National criteria on transfers: (iii) Transfer of Title. a b c d See explanatory notes. The nature of information provided should be indicated in accordance with explanatory notes e and f. Note: In addition, during Calendar Year 2004, transfers to Taiwan took place as follows: Category VI (Warships) 4 x DDG Category VII (Missiles/Missile Launchers) 20 x RGM-84L 2 x AGM-65G 40 x AGM-65G2 National criteria on transfers: (iii) Transfer of Title. a b c d See explanatory notes. The nature of information provided should be indicated in accordance with explanatory notes e and f. Standardized form for reporting international transfers of conventional arms (imports )a IMPORTS Report of international conventional arms transfers (according to United Nations General Assembly resolutions 46/36 L and 58/54) Reporting country: United States of America National point of contact: Office of International Security Negotiations, Bureau of Arms Control, U.S. Department of State Phone: 1-202-647-7909 Fax: 1-202-647-8746 E-Mail: [email protected] (Organization, Division/Section, telephone, fax, e-mail) (FOR GOVERNMENTAL USE ONLY) Calendar year: 2004 A B C Db Eb REMARKS c Category (I-VII) Exporter Number State of origin Intermediate Description Comments on the State(s) of items (if not exporter) location of item transfer (if any) I. Battle tanks II. Armoured combat vehicles III. Large-calibre artillery systems IV. Combat aircraft Israel 2 Kifir trainer Switzerland 6 F-5 V. Attack helicopters VI. Warships VII. Missiles and a) missile b) launchers d National criteria on transfers: iii) Transfer of Title. a b c d See explanatory notes. The nature of information provided should be indicated in accordance with explanatory notes e and f. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle
    SUMMARY AIFV Type : Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle ARMORED INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE Place of origin : United States Specifications : Dimensions : ● Weight : combat load 13.6 tons / empty 11.4 ton ● Length : 5.26 m ● Width : 2.82 m The AIFV is a tracked light armored ● Height : hull top front 1.85 m / rear 2.00 m vehicle that serves as an infantry fight- turret roof 2.79 m ing vehicle in several countries. It’s an ● Ground clearance : 0.432 m improved M113A1 armoured personnel carrier with 85% identical spare parts. Crew : 3+7 Armour : aluminium hull (40 mm) with spaced laminate steel armor on front and sides Main armament : 25 mm KBA-B02 cannon with ● Munition : 180 rounds ready; 144 in reserve ● Rate of fire : 50 rounds/min ● Muzzle velocities : 1.100 – 1.360 m/sec (depending ammo type) POWER PACK ● Firing height : 2.33 m GM Detroit Diesel 6V53 Turbo engine ● Recoil force : 2.500 kg Allison TX100-1A transmission Secondary armament : 7.62x51mm NATO Machine gun (not installed) ● Munition : 230 rounds ready; 1610 in reserve. MAX SPEED Smoke-laying equipment : 6 smoke grenade launchers mounted on the turret ● road 61.2 km/h Power pack : ● water 6.3 km/h ● Engine : GM Detroit Diesel 6V53 Turbo engine model 5063-5396 V-type watercooled engine ACCELERATION producing 265 hp at 2800 rpm 0 to 32 km/h in 10 sec ● Transmission : Allison TX100-1A transmission SUSPENSION ● Power/Weight Ratio : 19.29 hp/ton high strength torsion bars Max speed : road 61.2 km/h / water 6.3 km/h Acceleration : 0 to 32 km/h in 10 sec FUEL CAPACITY Suspension : High strength torsion bars 416 litres - range : 490 km Fuel capacity : 416 litres - range : 490 km Steering : mechanically controlled differential and pivot STEERING steering mechanically controlled differential and pivot steering Current operators : Bahrein 75, Chile (+169), Egypt (+1000), Jordan (500), Lebanon (16), Morocco (110), Malaysia (322), Philippines (71), Turkey EWS-ENCLOSED WEAPON STATION (+2000), United Arab Emirates (133) ● 25mm KBA-B02 cannon ● 7.26x51mm Nato machine gun FLANDERS TECHNICAL SUPPLY NV - SYLLAB SA J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mg 34 and Mg 42 Machine Guns
    MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS MC NAB © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS McNAB Series Editor Martin Pegler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEVELOPMENT 8 The ‘universal’ machine gun USE 27 Flexible firepower IMPACT 62 ‘Hitler’s buzzsaw’ CONCLUSION 74 GLOSSARY 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY & FURTHER READING 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Although in war all enemy weapons are potential sources of fear, some seem to have a deeper grip on the imagination than others. The AK-47, for example, is actually no more lethal than most other small arms in its class, but popular notoriety and Hollywood representations tend to credit it with superior power and lethality. Similarly, the bayonet actually killed relatively few men in World War I, but the sheer thought of an enraged foe bearing down on you with more than 30cm of sharpened steel was the stuff of nightmares to both sides. In some cases, however, fear has been perfectly justified. During both world wars, for example, artillery caused between 59 and 80 per cent of all casualties (depending on your source), and hence took a justifiable top slot in surveys of most feared tools of violence. The subjects of this book – the MG 34 and MG 42, plus derivatives – are interesting case studies within the scale of soldiers’ fears. Regarding the latter weapon, a US wartime information movie once declared that the gun’s ‘bark was worse than its bite’, no doubt a well-intentioned comment intended to reduce mounting concern among US troops about the firepower of this astonishing gun.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Foreign and Defense Policies
    Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies name redacted Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs December 21, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44017 Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies Summary Iran’s national security policy is the product of many, and sometimes competing, factors: the ideology of Iran’s Islamic revolution; Iranian leadership’s perception of threats to the regime and to the country; long-standing Iranian national interests; and the interaction of the Iranian regime’s various factions and constituencies. Some experts assert that the goal of Iran’s national security strategy is to overturn a power structure in the Middle East that Iran asserts favors the United States and its allies Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other Sunni Muslim Arab regimes. Iran characterizes its support for Shiite and other Islamist movements as support for the “oppressed” and asserts that Saudi Arabia, in particular, is instigating sectarian tensions and trying to exclude Iran from regional affairs. Others interpret Iran as primarily attempting to protect itself from U.S. or other efforts to invade or intimidate it or to change its regime. Its strategy might, alternatively or additionally, represent an attempt to enhance Iran’s international prestige or restore a sense of “greatness” reminiscent of the ancient Persian empires. From 2010 until 2016, Iran’s foreign policy also focused on attempting to mitigate the effects of international sanctions on Iran. Iran employs a number of different tools in pursuing its national security policy. Some Iranian policy tools are common to most countries: traditional diplomacy and the public promotion of Iran’s values and interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles
    The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles Product Code #F651 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Military Vehicles Forecast Analysis 2 The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles 2010 - 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................5 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................6 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................8 Table 1 - The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019.......................................................11 Table 2 - The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 .......................................................15 Figure
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weapons Transfers and Violations of the Laws of War in Turkey
    WEAPONS TRANSFERS AND VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR IN TURKEY Human Rights Watch Arms Project Human Right Watch New York AAA Washington AAA Los Angeles AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 November 1995 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-81502 ISBN 1-56432-161-4 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords. It also includes five collaborative projects on arms transfers, children's rights, free expression, prison conditions, and women's rights. It maintains offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles, London, Brussels, Moscow, Dushanbe, Rio de Janeiro, and Hong Kong. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, executive director; Cynthia Brown, program director; Holly J.
    [Show full text]
  • BICC Paper5: Dutch Surplus Weapons
    by Pieter D. Wezeman and Siemon T. Wezeman July 1996 Pieter D. Wezeman and Siemon T. Wezeman are Research Assistants on the SIPRI Arms Transfers Project. Copy editor: Alisa M. Federico BICC .AN DER ELISABETHKIRCHE 25 . 53113 BONN .GERMANY . PHONE +49-228-9 11 96-0 . FAX +49-228-24 12 15 DUTCH SURPLUS WEAPONS CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. REASONS FOR DISPOSAL 3 2.1 CFE obligations 3 3. DISPOSAL POLICY ON SURPLUS WEAPONS 5 3.1 Donation 5 3.2 Destruction 6 3.3 Sales 9 3.4 The Ministry of Defense as an arms dealer 11 4. FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF DUTCH SURPLUS WEAPON SALES 13 4.1 Prices of items 14 5. EXPORT REGULATIONS 17 5.1 Transparency 17 6. ACTUAL MARKETING AND SALES 19 6.1 Submarines 19 6.2 Frigates 20 6.3 Leopard 1V 21 6.4 Leopard 2 23 6.5 M-109 24 6.6 YPR-765 24 6.7 F-16 25 6.8 Non-strategic surplus equipment 25 7. CONCLUSION 26 References 27 Appendix I: List of Surplus Equipment for Sale 29 Appendix II: Dutch Exports of Surplus Major Conventional Weapons, 1970–199031 Appendix III: Acronyms 33 1. INTRODUCTION As in most Western countries, the shift in East-West relations in the early 1990s led to a major restructuring of the Dutch armed forces. The Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty and its accompanying reduction obligations were soon followed by the realization that further cutbacks were possible due to the new European security environment. In March 1991, therefore, the Dutch Ministry of Defense presented a defense white paper with plans for the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • A/71/138 General Assembly
    United Nations A/71/138 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 July 2016 English Original: English/French/Russian/ Spanish Seventy-first session Item 97 (g) of the preliminary list* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report, which is submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 68/43, contains information received from Member States on the export and import of conventional arms covered by the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, including “nil reports”, as well as additional background information on military holdings, procurement through national production and international transfers of small arms and light weapons for the calendar year 2015. As at the date of submission of the present report, the Secretary-General had received reports from 27 Governments. * A/71/50. 16-12115 (E) 090816 010916 *1612115* A/71/138 Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................... 3 II. Information received from Governments ........................................... 4 A. Index of information submitted by Governments ................................. 4 B. Reports received from Governments on conventional arms transfers................. 5 III. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production ............................................................. 30 IV. Information received from Governments on international transfers
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 13C. Register of the Transfers and Licensed Production of Major Conventional Weapons, 2002
    Appendix 13C. Register of the transfers and licensed production of major conventional weapons, 2002 BJÖRN HAGELIN, PIETER D. WEZEMAN, SIEMON T. WEZEMAN and NICHOLAS CHIPPERFIELD The register in table 13C.1 lists major weapons on order or under delivery, or for which the licence was bought and production was under way or completed during 2002. Sources and methods for data collection are explained in appendix 13D. Entries in table 13C.1 are alphabetical, by recipient, supplier and licenser. ‘Year(s) of deliveries’ includes aggregates of all deliveries and licensed production since the beginning of the contract. ‘Deal worth’ values in the Comments column refer to real monetary values as reported in sources and not to SIPRI trend-indicator values. Conventions, abbreviations and acronyms are explained below the table. For cross-reference, an index of recipients and licensees for each supplier can be found in table 13C.2. Table 13C.1. Register of transfers and licensed production of major conventional weapons, 2002, by recipients Recipient/ Year Year(s) No. supplier (S) No. Weapon Weapon of order/ of delivered/ or licenser (L) ordered designation description licence deliveries produced Comments Afghanistan S: Russia 1 An-12/Cub-A Transport aircraft (2002) 2002 (1) Ex-Russian; aid (5) Mi-24D/Mi-25/Hind-D Combat helicopter (2002) 2002 (5) Ex-Russian; aid (10) Mi-8T/Hip-C Helicopter (2002) 2002 (3) Ex-Russian; aid; delivery 2002–2003 (200) AT-4 Spigot/9M111 Anti-tank missile (2002) . Ex-Russian; aid Albania S: Italy (1) Bell-206/AB-206 Light helicopter
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq in Crisis
    MAY 2014 Iraq in Crisis ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN AND SAM KHAZAI AND SAM ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW| Washington DC 20036 t. (202) 887-0200 | f. (202) 775-3199 | www.csis.org Iraq in ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706 t. (800) 462-6420 | f. (301) 429-5749 | www.rowman.com Crisis AUTHORS Cover photo: Photo by Kaveh Seyedahmadian. http://www.flickr.com/photos/samanvari/3388535986/. Anthony H. Cordesman ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD ISBN 978-1-4422-2855-9 Sam Khazai Ë|xHSLEOCy228559z v*:+:!:+:! A Report of the CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy Blank Iraq in Crisis Authors Anthony H. Cordesman Sam Khazai A Report of the CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy May 2014 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMORED VEHICLES MARKET REPORT 2019 the WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE  #Iavevent
    presents THE WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE @IAVehicles ARMORED VEHICLES MARKET REPORT 2019 THE WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE #IAVEvent CONTENTS Rationale 3 Regional Developments 4 Africa 5 Europe 7 Indo-Asia Pacific 11 Middle East 14 North America 17 Latin America 18 Global Armoured Vehicle Holdings 19 Europe 20 Russia and Central Asia 24 Asia 27 North America 31 Middle East and North Africa 32 Sub-Saharan Africa 36 Latin America and Caribbean 41 International Armoured Vehicles 2019 44 2 THE WORLD’S LARGEST DEDICATED ARMOURED VEHICLE CONFERENCE #IAVEvent INTRODUCTION Within an ever changing strategic context, the market for armoured vehicles and related equipment has become even more wide- ranging. There has been a significant rise in the use of UGVs, artificial intelligence, virtual training and survivability equipment. Also, Active Protection Systems (APS) are being developed in lighter, cheaper and more accurate forms, supporting their case as a popular solution for the future battlespace. With all of the aforementioned in mind, the deployment of MBTs is still seen as a necessity by most in spite of climbing demand for light protected mobility. Ahead of International Armoured Vehicles 2019 conference, Defence IQ has compiled this market report to outline global key programmes and future requirements across all types of armoured vehicles. In January, Senior Representatives from the below countries will share their current requirements and challenges with the audience made up of over
    [Show full text]
  • 15. Conventional Arms Control and Military Confidence Building
    15. Conventional arms control and military confidence building ZDZISLAW LACHOWSKI and PÁL DUNAY I. Introduction The year 2004 marked the fifth anniversary of the decisions taken by the par- ticipating states of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) at its 1999 Istanbul Summit on ‘hard’ conventional arms control in Europe.1 Regrettably, the process remained stalemated in 2004. Seven new members were admitted to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in its second wave of post-cold war enlargement. This increased Russia’s con- cerns about the 1990 Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE Treaty), which are related to the fact that Russia considers itself to be at a security disadvantage. The 1999 Agreement on Adaptation of the CFE Treaty did not enter into force because of the refusal of the NATO members and other states to ratify it in the face of Russia’s non-compliance with some of its so-called ‘Istanbul commitments’ related to military pullouts from Georgia and Moldova. Russia nonetheless refrained from taking radical steps, such as withdrawing from the CFE Treaty regime. In 2004 the OSCE participating states continued to focus on adjusting and further developing certain norm- and standard-setting measures (NSSMs) in order to better respond to risks and challenges facing Europe and its neigh- bours. Regional arms control developed and functioned smoothly. In this con- text, the OSCE decided to suspend the operation of the Agreement on Confidence- and Security-Building Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina from September 2004.2 Croatia and Slovenia ratified the 1992 Treaty on Open Skies in 2004.3 Its February 2005 review conference was preceded by discussion of the relevance of the treaty and its applicability in the current security environment.
    [Show full text]