Weyland's Wars A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weyland's Wars A In Europe and Korea, Gen. Otto Weyland showed how airpower should support the ground forces. Then-Lt. Gen. George Patton (l) and Weyland in Nancy, France, in 1944. an “aerial flank”—protecting the swift advance of Patton’s armor in its advance through France. His experience in the Korean War was notably different, for both the Army and Air Force were totally un- prepared for the June 25, 1950 invasion of South Korea by communist North Korea. They had to fight with what they had: outdated and insufficient World War II equipment. Fortunately, Weyland’s wealth of experience and his credibility with both Army and Air Force leaders en- abled the pragmatic airman to adapt quickly in fighting the three distinctly different phases of the Korean War. In the beginning, overwhelming numbers of well-equipped North Ko- rean troops overran the inadequately Weyland’s Wars By Walter J. Boyne fighter pilot at heart, USAF most Army flag officers in the Korean armed South Korean Army, seeking Gen. Otto P. Weyland in- War. The term “most” does not mean to swiftly conquer the entire penin- stinctively punched his own “all,” however, as he was the target sula. USAF’s woefully inadequate Aticket in exactly the right way to make of bitter criticism by a few Army of- numbers of obsolescent World War II him a top Air Force commander in ficers who preferred “Marine-style” aircraft helped keep ill-equipped and two wars. He was as ardent in sup- close air support. undermanned land forces from being port of strategic airpower as any of Weyland’s achievements were all pushed into the sea. his contemporaries. Yet Weyland also the more remarkable because the Then came the daring Inchon land- achieved spectacular success through wars he fought were so very different ing of Sept. 15, 1950, a move that his determination to support Army in their nature. He commanded suc- turned the tide of the war. Weyland ground operations. cessively larger organizations during still lacked adequate resources but In his own words, he talked the World War II, applying first-class employed his forces so well they Army’s language. resources over huge areas, in con- destroyed the North Korean Army Gen. George S. Patton commended cert with well-equipped, well-trained even before Eighth Army began its Weyland as “the best damn general in Army outfits. The results were un- breakout from the Pusan Perimeter. the Air Corps” of World War II. He precedented. Weyland’s command, Finally, communist Chinese troops then received similar accolades from for the first time in history, provided poured across the Yalu River and joined 62 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2010 the fighting on the side of North Korea, This might have begun a perfectly the contrasting personalities of Wey- pushing the war into a stalemate. As ordinary career progression except land and Patton. both sides sought to find palatable for Weyland’s determination to learn Harmony thus assured, Quesada’s armistice terms, Weyland effectively how the Army operated at every level, IX TAC worked with Bradley’s First applied his still-marginal resources, and more important, how the Army Army, while Weyland’s XIX TAC implementing a series of successful wanted air operations conducted. It supported Patton’s Third Army in six air interdiction campaigns. For all this, was a unique viewpoint at a time when major campaigns. he drew criticism from some. most Air Corps officers unswervingly This was the sort of leadership that Weyland’s success in the joint supported the concept of strategic led Patton to his famous “best damn operations derived from his intimate bombing, and when a recalcitrant such general” assessment and to another, far knowledge of land warfare. Because as Claire L. Chennault might find his more meaningful tribute: After the war of his effective support of strategic career progress blocked. in Europe was won, Patton personally operations—he was a primary “pick By the time of Japan’s Dec. 7, 1941 told Weyland that he would be pleased and shovel” wielder in the creation attack on Pearl Harbor, Weyland was to have him as an Army corps com- of Strategic Air Command—Weyland a lieutenant colonel, commanding the mander. This was perhaps the greatest had the confidence of his superiors 16th Pursuit Group in Panama and compliment Patton could give. when he advocated additional re- serving as Sixth Air Force chief of Yet, like many of his contempo- sources for tactical operations. staff. Promotions came swiftly now, raries, Weyland languished in staff Weyland was born in Riverside, but he had to serve in staff roles at jobs when demobilization decimated Calif., in 1902. He went through the headquarters before being promoted the strength of American armed forces. classic career sequence of the era. to brigadier general and given the The newborn USAF was hampered Graduating with a degree in mechani- command of the 84th Fighter Wing. by tiny budgets, the drastic need for cal engineering in 1923, he accepted re-equipment with modern jet aircraft, a reserve commission in the US Army Best Damn General and the threat of a nuclear-armed and Air Service. He toyed with the idea of It was a good start to what became increasingly belligerent Soviet Union. working as an engineer for Western a brilliant career in World War II, Just after the North Korean inva- Electric but found that he preferred for in March 1944, he was made the sion of South Korea, Weyland was service life and sought a regular com- commanding general of XIX Tactical given command of TAC, but quickly mission after entering flying school. Air Command. It was here that his relinquished it to proceed to Japan. He trained first at Brooks Field, Tex., personality, experience, timing, and There he was vice commander for and then at nearby Kelly Field. circumstance coalesced into great operations, Far East Air Forces, under Promotion was slow in those days— success. Weyland spiced his taciturn Lt. Gen. George E. Stratemeyer. he was not made a first lieutenant until conversational mode with a subtle lev- Stratemeyer reported to Army Gen. 1930—but there were compensations. ity, which made him an ideal foil for Douglas MacArthur, commander in Weyland went to Hawaii’s Luke Field his Army counterpart, then-Lieutenant chief, Far East. on Ford Island, to command the 4th General Patton. Upon his arrival at his headquarters Observation Squadron. Patton allowed Weyland to dictate on July 20, Weyland realized he was the role of airpower and he not going to immediately reprise his did so ruthlessly. One unique successes in Europe. Instead of a well- consequence is that Weyland equipped Air Force supporting a well- personally accepted the sur- equipped Army, he found both services render of German Maj. Gen. short of men and equipment. Further, Eric Elster’s 20,000 Nazi troops the easy rapport with Patton was not in exchange for a cessation of going to be repeated, despite the fact air attacks. that Eighth Army and Fifth Air Force Weyland’s ability to get along had set up a joint operations center. extended to another colorful Weyland discovered that the air war commander, his boss at 9th was being directed by MacArthur’s Fighter Command (and com- staff, led by Maj. Gen. Edward M. mander of the “rival” IX TAC), Almond—a man who would try in Maj. Gen. Elwood R. Quesada. vain to thwart him. Someone had the foresight to Almond had attended Air Corps pair the more volatile Quesada Tactical School in 1938 and considered with the quieter personality of himself well-versed in air doctrine. He Army Gen. Omar N. Bradley, objected violently when, only three while similarly placing together days after his arrival, Weyland wrote a memo stating his objections to the way things were being handled. There followed a face-to-face confrontation Weyland (l), then commander in which the quiet but stern Weyland of XIX Tactical Air Command, reminded Almond that he outranked meets with Maj. Gen. Hoyt Van- him, was more knowledgeable about denberg, commander of Ninth Air Force, in Rennes, France, in air operations, and would carry out his 1944. instructions to run the air war. AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2010 63 expectation of close air support the Weyland was promoted Army never wished to relinquish. to general in 1952, while When FEAF and Bomber Command serving as commander of Far East Air Forces. He turned to more far-reaching targets, made close air support a many Army commanders resisted. top priority during his time The surprise massive Chinese in- in Korea. tervention that began in November and did not grind to a halt until late January 1951 totally reversed the strategic situation. United Nations columns of North Korean forces were thrust back far down the troops and supplies, be- peninsula. Once again, it was airpower lieving that after estab- that enabled UN forces to end their lishing air supremacy, the retreat and create a solid front line. first role of airpower was The new commander of Eighth to conduct an interdiction Army, Lt. Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway, campaign to cut enemy successfully re-established the morale lines of communication and offensive capability of his army, and supply. In doing so, but soon realized, as the Chinese did, Weyland demonstrated that a complete military victory was his innate flexibility. He no longer possible. Both sides then called upon Far East Air settled down to attrition warfare. Forces Bomber Com- The armistice was more than two mand to execute tactical years away. air strikes, something he By June 1951, Weyland was com- generally deplored.
Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1945-12-11 GO-116 728 ROB Central Europe Campaign Award
    GO 116 SWAR DEPARTMENT No. 116. WASHINGTON 25, D. C.,11 December- 1945 UNITS ENTITLED TO BATTLE CREDITS' CENTRAL EUROPE.-I. Announcement is made of: units awarded battle par- ticipation credit under the provisions of paragraph 21b(2), AR 260-10, 25 October 1944, in the.Central Europe campaign. a. Combat zone.-The.areas occupied by troops assigned to the European Theater of" Operations, United States Army, which lie. beyond a line 10 miles west of the Rhine River between Switzerland and the Waal River until 28 March '1945 (inclusive), and thereafter beyond ..the east bank of the Rhine.. b. Time imitation.--22TMarch:,to11-May 1945. 2. When'entering individual credit on officers' !qualiflcation cards. (WD AGO Forms 66-1 and 66-2),or In-the service record of enlisted personnel. :(WD AGO 9 :Form 24),.: this g!neial Orders may be ited as: authority forsuch. entries for personnel who were present for duty ".asa member of orattached' to a unit listed&at, some time-during the'limiting dates of the Central Europe campaign. CENTRAL EUROPE ....irst Airborne Army, Headquarters aMd 1st Photographic Technical Unit. Headquarters Company. 1st Prisoner of War Interrogation Team. First Airborne Army, Military Po1ie,e 1st Quartermaster Battalion, Headquar- Platoon. ters and Headquarters Detachment. 1st Air Division, 'Headquarters an 1 1st Replacementand Training Squad- Headquarters Squadron. ron. 1st Air Service Squadron. 1st Signal Battalion. 1st Armored Group, Headquarters and1 1st Signal Center Team. Headquarters 3attery. 1st Signal Radar Maintenance Unit. 19t Auxiliary Surgical Group, Genera]1 1st Special Service Company. Surgical Team 10. 1st Tank DestroyerBrigade, Headquar- 1st Combat Bombardment Wing, Head- ters and Headquarters Battery.: quarters and Headquarters Squadron.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified Xxix S E C\E T
    A. Fighter; Total claims against enemy aircraft during the month were 39-0-13 in the air and 1-0-2 on the ground. Missions 25 Sorties 296 d. Flak.— XIX TAC aircraft losses for the month because of flak Tons Bombs on Tgts 128 were unusually high. Out of the 50 aircraft lost, 35 were victims of Tons Frags 14.69 flak. The enemy, realizing that the greatest threat to the success of Tons Napalm 7.15 its ARD3NNBS salient was American air power, built up a very strong Tons Incendiaries 10.25 anti-aircraft defense around the entire area. Rockets 22 Claims (air) 4-1-1 The TTY TAC A-2 Flak Officer, reporting near the end of the Geraan retreat from the Bulge area, said: B. Reconnaissance: "The proportion of flak protection to troops and area involved (in Tac/R Sorties 58/36 1. INTRODUCTION. the ARDENNES area) was higher than in any previous operation in this P/R Sorties 7/6 war's history. Artillery sorties 4/2 a. General.— opening the year of 1945, the XIX Tactical Air Com­ mand-Third US Army team had a big job on its hands before it could re­ "Flak units were apparently given the highest priorities in supply C. Night Fighter: sume the assault of the SIEGFRIED LINE. The German breakthrough into of fuel and ammunition. They must also have been given a great degree of the ARDENNES had been checked but not yet smashed. The enemy columns freedom in moving over roads always taxed to capacity. Sorties 15 which had surged toward the MEUSE were beginning to withdraw, for the Claims (air) 1-0-0 v­ wily Rundstedt's best-laid plans had been wrecked on the rock of BAS­ "In addition to the tremendous quantities of mobile flak assigned TOGNS.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Expeditionary Air Force 6 June 1944
    Allied Expeditionary Air Force 6 June 1944 HEADQUARTERS ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY AIR FORCE No. 38 Group 295th Squadron (Albemarle) 296th Squadron (Albemarle) 297th Squadron (Albemarle) 570th Squadron (Albemarle) 190th Squadron (Stirling) 196th Squadron (Stirling) 299th Squadron (Stirling) 620th Squadron (Stirling) 298th Squadron (Halifax) 644th Squadron (Halifax) No 45 Group 48th Squadron (C-47 Dakota) 233rd Squadron (C-47 Dakota) 271st Squadron (C-47 Dakota) 512th Squadron (C-47 Dakota) 575th Squadron (C-47 Dakota) SECOND TACTICAL AIR FORCE No. 34 Photographic Reconnaissance Group 16th Squadron (Spitfire) 140th Squadron (Mosquito) 69th Squadron (Wellington) Air Spotting Pool 808th Fleet Air Arm Squadron (Seafire) 885th Fleet Air Arm Squadron (Seafire) 886th Fleet Air Arm Squadron (Seafire) 897th Fleet Air Arm Squadron (Seafire) 26th Squadron (Spitfire) 63rd Squadron (Spitfire) No. 2 Group No. 137 Wing 88th Squadron (Boston) 342nd Squadron (Boston) 226th Squadron (B-25) No. 138 Wing 107th Squadron (Mosquito) 305th Squadron (Mosquito) 613th Squadron (Mosquito) NO. 139 Wing 98th Squadron (B-25) 180th Squadron (B-25) 320th Squadron (B-25) No. 140 Wing 21st Squadron (Mosquito) 464th (RAAF) Squadron (Mosquito) 487t (RNZAF) Squadron (Mosquito) No. 83 Group No. 39 Reconnaissance Wing 168th Squadron (P-51 Mustang) 414th (RCAF) Squadron (P-51 Mustang) 430th (RCAF) Squadron (P-51 Mustang) 1 400th (RCAF) Squadron (Spitfire) No. 121 Wing 174th Squadron (Typhoon) 175th Squadron (Typhoon) 245th Squadron (Typhoon) No. 122 Wing 19th Squadron (P-51 Mustang) 65th Squadron (P-51 Mustang) 122nd Squadron (P-51 Mustang) No. 124 Wing 181st Squadron (Typhoon) 182nd Squadron (Typhoon) 247th Squadron (Typhoon) No. 125 Wing 132nd Squadron (Spitfire) 453rd (RAAF) Squadron (Spitfire) 602nd Squadron (Spitfire) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Brief Installations and Usaaf Combat Units In
    HISTORICAL BRIEF INSTALLATIONS AND USAAF COMBAT UNITS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM 1942 - 1945 REVISED AND EXPANDED EDITION OFFICE OF HISTORY HEADQUARTERS THIRD AIR FORCE UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE OCTOBER 1980 REPRINTED: FEBRUARY 1985 FORE~ORD to the 1967 Edition Between June 1942 ~nd Oecemhcr 1945, 165 installations in the United Kingdom were used by combat units of the United States Army Air I"orce~. ;\ tota) of three numbered .,lr forl'es, ninc comllklnds, frJur ;jfr divi'iions, )} w1.l\~H, Illi j(r,IUpl', <lnd 449 squadron!'! were at onE' time or another stationed in ',r'!;rt r.rftaIn. Mnny of tlal~ airrll'lds hnvc been returned to fann land, others havl' houses st.lnding wh~rr:: t'lying Fortr~ss~s and 1.lbcratorR nllce were prepared for their mis.'ilons over the Continent, Only;l few rcm:l.1n ;IS <Jpcr.Jt 11)11., 1 ;'\frfll'ldH. This study has been initl;ltcd by the Third Air Force Historical Division to meet a continuin~ need for accurate information on the location of these bases and the units which they served. During the pas t several years, requests for such information from authors, news media (press and TV), and private individuals has increased. A second study coverin~ t~e bases and units in the United Kingdom from 1948 to the present is programmed. Sources for this compilation included the records on file in the Third Air Force historical archives: Maurer, Maurer, Combat Units of World War II, United States Government Printing Office, 1960 (which also has a brief history of each unit listed); and a British map, "Security Released Airfields 1n the United Kingdom, December 1944" showing the locations of Royal Air Force airfields as of December 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron's
    The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron’s Experience during the Development of World War II Tactical Air Power by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2013 Keywords: World War II, fighter squadrons, tactical air power, P-47 Thunderbolt, European Theater of Operations Copyright 2013 by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce Approved by William Trimble, Chair, Alumni Professor of History Alan Meyer, Assistant Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Abstract During the years between World War I and World War II, many within the Army Air Corps (AAC) aggressively sought an independent air arm and believed that strategic bombardment represented an opportunity to inflict severe and dramatic damages on the enemy while operating autonomously. In contrast, working in cooperation with ground forces, as tactical forces later did, was viewed as a subordinate role to the army‘s infantry and therefore upheld notions that the AAC was little more than an alternate means of delivering artillery. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt called for a significantly expanded air arsenal and war plan in 1939, AAC strategists saw an opportunity to make an impression. Eager to exert their sovereignty, and sold on the efficacy of heavy bombers, AAC leaders answered the president‘s call with a strategic air doctrine and war plans built around the use of heavy bombers. The AAC, renamed the Army Air Forces (AAF) in 1941, eventually put the tactical squadrons into play in Europe, and thus tactical leaders spent 1943 and the beginning of 1944 preparing tactical air units for three missions: achieving and maintaining air superiority, isolating the battlefield, and providing air support for ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower and Ground Armies : Essays on the Evolution of Anglo-American Air Doctrine
    Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Airpower and ground armies : essays on the evolution of Anglo-American air doctrine. 1940- 1943/ editor, Daniel R Mortensen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Air power-Great Britain-History. 2. Air power-United States-History. 3. World War, 1939-1945- Aerial operations, British, 4. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial operations, American. 5. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Africa, North. 6. Operation Torch. I. Mortensen, Daniel R. UG635.G7A89 1998 358.4’03-dc21 97-46744 CIP Digitize December 2002 from 1998 Printing NOTE: Pagination changed Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Table of Contents Page DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................... i FORWARD........................................................................................................................ iii ABOUT THE EDITOR .......................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. vi GETTING TOGETHER ......................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Spearhead of Patton's Third Army Is Anything but a One-Man Book
    XII CORPS SPEARHEAD OF PATTON’S THIRD ARMY [14 March 1945 to 9 May 1945] by LT COL GEORGE DYER Formerly Liaison Officer and Special Assistant to the Chief of Staff Headquarters, XII U S ARMY CORPS CONTENTS FRONT MATTER INTRODUCTION 1. Background: the XII Corps History Association 2. General Policy and Form of the Writing 3. Credits 4. Character of XII Corps ABBREVIATIONS BASIC MAP SYMBOLS PICTURES PINUPS LILI MARLEEN CHAPTER 13 - SECOND MOSELLE. 14 MARCH 45 - 22 MARCH 45 1. The Real "Operation Grab" 2. Six Divisions 3. The Nahe 4. Simmern and Bad Kreuznach 5. Wind-up of the Palatinate Campaign CHAPTER 14 - FIRST ASSAULT CROSSING OF THE RHINE. 22 MARCH – 26 MARCH 45 1. Preliminary 2. The Fifth Infantry Division's Great Day 3. US Army Engineers – and the U.S. Navy 4. All-out Support for the Bridgehead 5. Darmstadt, Frankfurt, and the Main 6. Payoff CHAPTER 15 - FROM THE RHINE TO CZECHOSLOVAKIA. 26 MARCH 45 – 22 APRIL 45 1. End of a Banner Month 2. The Strange Case of the 6th SS Mountain Division 3. Gotha and Ohrdruff 4. Peculiar Treasures 5. Salted Gold 6. Germany Cut in Two 7. To Kronach and Bayreuth CHAPTER 16 - AUSTRIA – AND VE-DAY. 22 APRIL 45 – 9 MAY 45 1. Grafenwohr 2. Into Austria; and the Myth of the "National Redoubt" 3. The Last Week of Battle 4. End of the 11th Panzer Division; the "Werewolves," and Others 5. Plan Eclipse 6. "Death Marches" and "Death Camps" 7. The Russians, and VE-Day Introduction 1. Background: the XII Corps History Association During the summer of 1945 headquarters of XII U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • El, P,-T 1711 R I D '. 'I
    W-.- -- ---- * _ e a : AUTIYH: CG XIX TAC: :DATE: 30 SEPT 44: : INIT: : :g::): 0*0 .0~~. 0O... TWELVE THOUSAID, FIGHTER-BOMEBEHR SORTIES ;t- * *** XIX Tactical Air Conmland's i'irst Tonth of CDerations in Support of Third US Army in France in Support at' Third. UZ) riny in rance z , 'Y I I I, i El, P,-T4 , 1711I I d'., ,i r I "I'I J , - DECLASSIFIED C OTENTS No. of Paggs Frontispiece. 1 . Introduction. ... ....... ..... 1 Notes on Organization, Tactics, and Technique . 6 Missions of the XIX Tactical Air Colmuand (Photos), . 6 The Background, In Brief. .... 2 Air Operations Day by Day . ..33 Five Accompanying Maps . 5 Recapitulation . 2 Annex 1: Map Showing Location of Units. ..... 1 ^.F^^AIsz Elf'l DEIII SSEI E J.! 21 I1 5 Lieut. Gen. GEORGE S. PATTON, JR. Commanding, Third U.S. Army, and Brig. Gen. 0. P. WETLAND, Commanding, XIX Tactical Air Command. %- ^--*-^ HEADQUARTERS (ADVANCED) :DA2TE: 30 Sept 44: XIX, ACTICAL AIR CG0MAND zT=. .. 6. APO 141, U. S. Army. 30 September 1944. INTRODUCTION Within one month of the day when the Third US Army and XIX Tactical Air Command of the Ninth Air Force began operations together in France, the armored and infantry divisions and covering fighter-bombers of this new ground-air team had broken out of NOMANDY into BRITTANZ, conquered all of that peninsula except three stubborn ports, firmly secured the line of the LOIRE, and swept 140 miles beyond liberated PARIS to within 60 miles of the German border. While the events are still warm these notes and historical record are written, with the hope that some of the many lessons in teamwork and technique which were learned in that eventful month may be of tactical value.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Participants and Contemporaries: Papers
    World War II Participants and Contemporaries: Papers Container List ACCETTA, DOMINICK Residence: Fort Lee, New Jersey Service: 355th Inf Regt, Europe Volume: -1" Papers (1)(2) [record of Cannon Co., 355th Inf. Regt., 89th Inf. Div., Jan.-July 1945; Ohrdruf Concentration Camp; clippings; maps; booklet ”The Story of the 89th Infantry Division;” orders; song; ship’s newspaper, Jan. 1946;map with route of 89th Div.] AENCHBACHER, A.E. "Gene" Residence: Wichita, Kansas Service: Pilot, 97th Bomber Group, Europe; flew DDE from Gibraltar to North Africa, November 1942 Volume: -1" Papers [letters; clippings] ALFORD, MARTIN Residence: Abilene, Kansas Service: 5th Inf Div, Europe Volume: -1" Papers [copy of unit newspaper for 5th Inf. Div., May 8, 1945; program for memorial service; statistics on service and casualties in wars and conflicts] ALLMON, WILLIAM B. Residence: Jefferson City, Missouri Service: historian Volume: -1” 104 Inf Div (1) (2) [after action report for November 1944, describing activities of division in southwest Holland; this is a copy of the original report at the National Archives] 1 AMERICAN LEGION NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS Residence: Indianapolis, Indiana Service: Veteran's organization Volume: 13" After the War 1943-45 [a monthly bulletin published by the Institute on Postwar Reconstruction, Aug. 1943-April 1945] American Legion Publications (1)-(11) [civil defense; rights and benefits of veterans; home front; citizenship; universal draft; national defense and security program; Americanism; employment manual; Boy Scouts-youth program; G. I. Bill of Rights; peace and foreign relations; disaster; natural resources; law and order; UMT-universal military training; national defense; veterans’ employment; 1946 survey of veterans; reprint of two pages from The National Legionnaire, June 1940; instructors manual for military drill; United Nations; junior baseball program] Army-Navy YMCA Bulletin, 1942-44 Atlas of World Battle Fronts [1943-45] China at War, 1939 [four issues published by the China Information Publishing Co.] Clippings [submarine war; Alaska; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Power for Patton's Army
    AIR POWER FOR PATTON’S ARMY The XIX Tactical Air Command in the Second World War David N. Spires Air Force History and Museums Program Washington, D. C. 2002 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Spires, David N. Air Power for Patton’s Army : the XIX Tactical Air Command in the Second World War / David N. Spires. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. World War, 1939-1945—Aerial operations, American. 2. United States. Army Air Forces. Tactical Air Command, 19th—History. 3. World War, 1939- 1945—Campaigns—Western Front. 4. Close air sup- port—History—20th century. 5. United States. Army. Army, 3rd—History. I. Title. D790 .S65 2002 940.54’4973—dc21 2002000903 In Memory of Colonel John F. “Fred” Shiner, USAF (1942–1995) Foreword This insightful work by David N. Spires holds many lessons in tacti- cal air-ground operations. Despite peacetime rivalries in the drafting of service doctrine, in World War II the immense pressures of wartime drove army and air commanders to cooperate in the effective prosecution of battlefield opera- tions. In northwest Europe during the war, the combination of the U.S. Third Army commanded by Lt. Gen. George S. Patton and the XIX Tactical Air Command led by Brig. Gen. Otto P. Weyland proved to be the most effective allied air-ground team of World War II. The great success of Patton’s drive across France, ultimately crossing the Rhine, and then racing across southern Germany, owed a great deal to Weyland’s airmen of the XIX Tactical Air Command. This deft cooperation paved the way for allied victory in Westren Europe and today remains a clas- sic example of air-ground effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Arracourt- -- September 1944
    UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER ADB067783 NEW LIMITATION CHANGE TO Approved for public release, distribution unlimited FROM Distribution limited to U.S. Gov't. agencies only; Proprietary Info.; 4 Jun 82. Other requests for this document must be referred to Commander, US Army Combined Arms Center & Fort Leavenworth, Attn: ATZL-PTS-IS. Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027. AUTHORITY USACGSC ltr, 2 May 2001 THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED , .EEhhh hmmEI~, F / ~. 1 6) J./ ARRACOURT- -- SEPTEMBER 1944 A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Amy Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE by RICHARD H..BARNES, MAJ, FA B.A., Temple University, 1966 B.S., University of Michigan, 1969 M.F., University of Michigan, 1969 M.A., Middlebury College, 1974 D T IC S ELECTE SEP 22 1982 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas .___- 1982 S"i5T.i.T-i .ITED TO U... GOV'T AGENCIES C) LY.,': •L3•".•."•~ . r2. O~s~ '.'si-"SS irn; .u -f ":.-.'i .'T '.•iUST ZZ REF.iRLD TO: HQ TRADOC, AT.LN•: AA'CS-D, FORT MONBOE, VA 23651 82-4652 82 u9 21 034 li11r~~rv~~ "re. UNCLAS - SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS P'AGE (Wheii~ Date Rr~toerd) READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM 1. REPORT NUMBER 12.GVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CAT AI.OG NUMBER 4, TITLE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED ARRACOURT--SEPTENBER 1944 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. AUTH.OR(*) 8- CONTRACT0., GRANT NUMBER(b) Major Richard H. Barnes 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10.
    [Show full text]