DOCSLIB.ORG

M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme Heritage Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme Heritage Statement 04 August 2017 Mott MacDonald 35 Newhall Street Birmingham B3 3PU United Kingdom T +44 (0)121 234 1500 F 44 (0)121 200 3295 mottmac.com M6 Junction 10 Improvement 370629-MMD-REP-ES-0010-01 Scheme http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=2119213024&objAction=browse&viewType=1 Mott MacDonald Heritage Statement 04 August 2017 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme Heritage Statement Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 04/04/17 K Luker P Riccoboni J Timothy First draft for internal comment J. Stroud B 27/04/17 K. Luker P. Riccoboni J. Timothy For client comment R. Mackay E. Lunt C 04/08/17 K. Luker P. Riccoboni J. Timothy Capturing client comments E Lunt Document reference: 370629-MMD-REP-ES-0010-01 Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This report has been pr epared sol el y for use by the party which commissi oned it (the ‘Client’) i n connecti on with the capti oned proj ect. It should not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party who has expressl y ag reed ter ms of r eliance with us (the ‘Reci pient(s)’) may rel y on the content, i nformati on or any views expressed i n the repor t. We accept no duty of care, responsi bility or liability to any other r eci pient of thi s document. T his r eport is confi denti al and c ontains pr opri etar y intell ectual property. No representati on, warranty or under taking, expr ess or i mplied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Cli ent or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or completeness of the i nformati on contai ned i n this r eport. For the avoidance of doubt this r eport does not in any way purport to i nclude any legal , insur ance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion. We disclai m all and any liability whether arising i n tort or contract or other wise which it might otherwise have to any party other than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in r espect of this report, or any infor mation attri buted to i t. We accept no r esponsibility for any error or omission i n the r eport which is due to an error or omission i n data, infor mation or statements supplied to us by other par ties incl udi ng the client (‘D ata’). We have not i ndependentl y verified such D ata and have assumed it to be accurate, complete, reli abl e and current as of the date of such infor mation. Forecasts presented i n this document were pr epared usi ng Data and the report is dependent or based on D ata. Inevitabl y, some of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances may occur. C onsequentl y M ott MacDonal d does not guarantee or warr ant the concl usi ons contained i n the repor t as there are li kel y to be differ ences between the for ecasts and the actual results and those di ffer ences may be material. Whil e we consi der that the infor mation and opini ons gi ven i n this r eport are sound all parti es must rel y on their own skill and j udgement when making use of it. Under no circumstances may this report or any extr act or summar y ther eof be used in connection with any public or pri vate sec urities offering i ncluding any rel ated memorandum or prospectus for any securities offering or stock exchange listing or announcement. 370629-MMD-REP-ES-0010-01 | 04 August 2017 http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=2119213024&objAction=browse&viewType=1 Mott MacDonald | M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme Heritage Statement Contents Abbreviations 1 Executive Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Introduction to Cultural Heritage 3 1.2 Overview of the M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme 3 1.3 Legislation Policy and Guidance 5 2 Approach and Methodology 9 2.1 Assessment Methodology 9 2.2 Study Area 9 2.3 Site Visit 9 2.4 Assumptions and Limitations 9 3 Baseline 10 3.1 Introduction 10 3.2 Existing conditions of the Anson Branch and Bentley Canal 10 3.3 Historical Background of the Anson Branch and Bentley Canal 10 3.4 Historic Map Regression of the Anson Branch and Bentley Canal 11 4 Heritage Significance of the Anson Branch and Bentley Canal 15 5 Impact Assessment 16 6 Conclusions 17 6.1 Summary of Assessment 17 7 References 18 Appendices 19 A. Selected photographs from the site visit of the study area 20 370629-MMD-REP-ES-0010-01 | 04 August 2017 http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=2119213024&objAction=browse&viewType=1 Mott MacDonald | M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme 1 Heritage Statement Abbreviations Abbreviation Definition CIfA Chartered Institute for Archaeologists DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges EAR Environmental Assessment Report EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement GPA Good Practice Advice HER Historic Environment Record J10 Junction 10 NPPF National Planning Policy Framework UDP Unitary Development Plan 370629-MMD-REP-ES-0010-01 | 04 August 2017 http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=2119213024&objAction=browse&viewType=1 Mott MacDonald | M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme 2 Heritage Statement Executive Summary This Heritage Statement presents the heritage significance of the Anson Branch of the Walsall Canal and the Bentley Canal, and an assessment of the impact the development at the M6 Junction 10 (herby referred to as ‘the Scheme’) would have on the significance of these assets. It acts as a supporting document to the Environmental Statement. Both canals are non-designated heritage assets, meaning although they have no statutory protection they been identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions (National Planning Policy Framework, 2012). An Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) has assessed the impact the Scheme would have on all known and potential cultural heritage assets within a study area comprising up to 200m from the site boundary. The EAR concluded that during construction and operation the Scheme would have neutral or neutral/slight adverse effects on all heritage assets within the study area. It was therefore recommended in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report that Cultural Heritage was not taken forward to EIA stage for either construction or operational phases. However, the EIA Scoping Report further recommended that it would be appropriate to produce a desk based assessment, focussing on the potential impact on the Anson Branch and Bentley Canal. This Heritage Statement fulfils this requirement. This assessment concludes that both assets have low heritage significance and that the Scheme would have less than substantial harm on them. 370629-MMD-REP-ES-0010-01 | 04 August 2017 http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=2119213024&objAction=browse&viewType=1 Mott MacDonald | M6 Junction 10 Improvement Scheme 3 Heritage Statement 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction to Cultural Heritage 1.1.1 This Heritage Statement presents the results of the assessment of impact the Scheme would have on the Anson Branch of the Walsall Canal and the Bentley Canal. These are both non- designated heritage assets, meaning although they have no statutory protection, they have been identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions (National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2012). This Heritage Statement will act as a supporting document to the Environmental Statement. 1.1.2 An Environmental Assessment Report (see Appendix 2.1 in Volume II of this ES) has assessed the impact the Scheme would have on all known and potential cultural heritage assets within a study area comprising a 200m radius from the Scheme. This assessment found that it is considered that during construction and operation the Scheme would have neutral or neutral/slight adverse effects on all heritage assets within the study area. It was therefore recommended in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report (see Appendix 1.1 in Volume I of this ES) that Cultural Heritage was not taken forward to EIA stage for either construction or operational phases. However, the EIA Scoping Report further recommended that: ‘it is however proposed to undertake a Desk-Based Assessment focussing only on the Anson Branch Canal feature, using information from the design to understand more fully any potential impacts to this feature and if any specific mitigation measures are required to feed into the design’. 1.1.3 The Scoping Opinion Response from Walsall Council included comments from the Conservation Officer and the Canals and River Trust.
Recommended publications
  • PDF995, Job 6

    PDF995, Job 6

    The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country _____________________________________________________________ The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background December 2005 Protecting Wildlife for the Future The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country gratefully acknowledges support from English Nature, Dudley MBC, Sandwell MBC, Walsall MBC and Wolverhampton City Council. This Report was compiled by: Dr Ellen Pisolkar MSc IEEM The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3. SITES 4 3.1 Introduction 4 3.2 Birmingham 3.2.1 Edgbaston Reservoir 5 3.2.2 Moseley Bog 11 3.2.3 Queslett Quarry 17 3.2.4 Spaghetti Junction 22 3.2.5 Swanshurst Park 26 3.3 Dudley 3.3.1 Castle Hill 30 3.3.2 Doulton’s Claypit/Saltwells Wood 34 3.3.3 Fens Pools 44 3.4 Sandwell 3.4.1 Darby’s Hill Rd and Darby’s Hill Quarry 50 3.4.2 Sandwell Valley 54 3.4.3 Sheepwash Urban Park 63 3.5 Walsall 3.5.1 Moorcroft Wood 71 3.5.2 Reedswood Park 76 3.5 3 Rough Wood 81 3.6 Wolverhampton 3.6.1 Northycote Farm 85 3.6.2 Smestow Valley LNR (Valley Park) 90 3.6.3 West Park 97 4. HABITATS 101 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 Heathland 103 4.3 Canals 105 4.4 Rivers and Streams 110 4.5 Waterbodies 115 4.6 Grassland 119 4.7 Woodland 123 5.
  • Contacts: T Becoming More Active

    Contacts: T Becoming More Active

    KEY National Cycle Route Existing cycle routes and safer routes to school On road cycle facilities rrss and bus lanes AA SSttaa Canal towpath Cycle stands Pedestrian area Walsall Walk On Health Walks Local Programme Town Centre Map Groups TO BROWNHILLS A454 TO ALDRIDGE & A34 TO BLOXWICH/ A461 TO BROWNHILLS CANNOCK TO ALDRIDGE Active Sustainable Travel TO Da & LICHFIELD Gr y WALSALL Str REEDSWOOD een ee t COLLEGE L an POLICE ARBORETUM e STATION And Road Safety Walking is Not sure where to start? Joining a group LAW LEATHER MUSEUM COURTS treet Littleton S one of the best is a great way of discovering new routes A4148 The A*STARS programme looks at promoting Wi llen A4148 TO h sustainable travel on the school journey and during and improving your skills and fitness with al st St t l C e y af t e BIRMINGHAM/ cle We Rout e ford n ee Str e La tr ld M6 J7 & J9 the school day. It also develops opportunities for e St and easiest ways of S the help of more experienced people. TO WILLENHALL u fie Bl on re rt Lich et training and new initiatives, such as walking bus he Here are a few useful contacts: t becoming more active. Supermarket Ha schemes. After a successful pilot, the programme is Supermarket now being rolled-out across all Walsall schools d CIVIC Walking regularly can: CTC Walsall Member Group a BATHS Ro CENTRE Pilot project achievements (2010-2012): n to LIBRARY Wol er verhampton POST (Cyclists’ Touring Club) Street Hath In OFFICE to • Help weight loss A454 TO WILLENHALL/ wn 3% increase in walking and cycling levels in R WOLVERHAMPTON M6 J10 WALSALL CANAL ART ow Contact: 01543 377145 BASIN GALLERY COUNCIL A*STARS schools, compared to an overall Walsall THE • Ease back pain Butlers HOUSE [email protected] Passage CROSSING t average of 1.8% e e r Pa t S rk l www.chasecycling.co.uk l • Reduce the risks of heart disease St re Br ha i s 3.7% reduction in single car use.
  • Display PDF in Separate

    Display PDF in Separate

    NRA Severn-Trent 36 TAME CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT JANUARY 1996 v NRA N at ion a I Rivers Authority Sc v e rn - Trcn t R eg io n Your views We want your views, comments, ideas and criticisms This is the basis for consultation between the NRA and all those with interests in the catchment. Please consider:- o The Vision for the Catchment. o The issues and options identified in the report. o Alternative options for resolving identified issues. o Raising additional issues not identified in the report. o Raising anything else you feel is important. All comments received will be treated as public information unless you explicitly state otherwise in your response. Following the consultation period all comments received will be considered in preparing the next phase, the Action Plan. This Consultation Report will not be rewritten as part of the Action Plan process. We intend that the Plan should influence the policies and action of developers, planning authorities and other as well as assisting in the day to day management of the Catchment. A letter outlining the issues was sent to local authorities, national organisations, other representative bodies and representatives of the NRA Statutory Committees in the summer of 1995. All the comments have been incorporated into this document where possible. A list of organisations that were contacted is given in Appendix 1. We are grateful for the useful suggestions received. Comments on the Consultation Report should be sent to: Tony Stanley National Rivers Authority Upper Trent Area Sentinel House 9 Wellington Crescent Fradley Park Lichfield Staffs WS13 8RR All contributions should be made in writing by: 31 March 1996 If you or your organisation need further information or further copies of this Report, please contact Jonathan Jenkin at the above address or by telephone on (01543) 444141 Ext 4086.
  • BCN Moorings Leaflet

    BCN Moorings Leaflet

    FACILITIES GENERAL INFORMATION WATER POINTS he Birmingham Canal Navigations (BCN) is a 100 mile network of narrow Sherborne Wharf (Birmingham) [0121 456 6163] T canals situated at the very heart of the Midlands waterway system. There is, Farmers Bridge Top Lock (Birmingham & Fazeley) Holliday Wharf (just south of Gas Street Basin) arguably, no other inland waterways complex in the world which provides such Tividale Aqueduct (Netherton Tunnel Branch) vivid, sometimes breathtaking, contrasts. It would be difficult to imagine a canal Tividale Aqueduct (Old Main Line) landscape containing more features of interest to such a wide variety of users. Wolverhampton Top Lock Wolverhampton Lock No.15 BW Sneyd Yard (Wyrley & Essington) Unfortunately, the BCN harbours a serious burden – its image. To the uninitiated the Anglesey Bridge Marina (Anglesey Branch) [01543 454994] Longwood Junction (by Boat Club) BCN is still perceived as grimy and unpleasant, but this is simply not true. Perry Barr Top Lock Admittedly, some parts do pass through industrialised areas – but remember – that is Walsall Top Lock the reason they were built in the first place! There are many others which remain Parkhead Junction (next to pump house) Aldridge Marina (Daw End Branch) [01922 53397] amazingly rural and completely unspoilt. Nowhere is this more apparent than the Hawne Basin (Dudley No.2) delightful areas of the Northern BCN, providing many miles of tranquil, trouble-free Malthouse Stables, Tipton (Old Main Line) cruising. Cuckoo Wharf (Aston Locks) Canal Transport Services (Cannock Extension) [01543 374370] Grove Colliery Basin (Cannock Extension) Fortunately British Waterways, in conjunction with local canal societies and Black Country Museum Coronation Gardens, Tipton (Old Main Line) councils, has done much in recent years to enhance the waterside, to improve NEW – Windmill End (Dudley No.2) [next to new visitor centre].
  • BCN Leaflet Amendments

    BCN Leaflet Amendments

    “FINDING YOUR WAY “FINDING YOUR WAY “FINDING YOUR WAY AROUND THE BCN” AROUND THE BCN” AROUND THE BCN” Additions and Amendments Additions and Amendments Additions and Amendments MOORINGS INFORMATION: MOORINGS INFORMATION: MOORINGS INFORMATION: There are now suitable moorings at: There are now suitable mooorings at: There are now suitable mooorings at: • Black Cock Bridge (Daw End Branch) • Black Cock Bridge (Daw End Branch) • Black Cock Bridge (Daw End Branch) • Walsall Town Wharf • Walsall Town Wharf • Walsall Town Wharf • BW, Ocker Hill (Walsall Canal) • BW, Ocker Hill (Walsall Canal) • BW, Ocker Hill (Walsall Canal) PUBS: PUBS: PUBS: Add the following to the list: Add the following to the list: Add the following to the list: • “Tap & Spile” (Gas St Basin) • “Tap & Spile” (Gas St Basin) • “Tap & Spile” (Gas St Basin) • “The Victoria”, Tipton (Old Main Line) • “The Victoria”, Tipton (Old Main Line) • “The Victoria”, Tipton (Old Main Line) • “Church Tavern, Perry Barr (Tame Valley Canal) • “Church Tavern, Perry Barr (Tame Valley Canal) • “Church Tavern, Perry Barr (Tame Valley Canal) • “The Dilke” (west of Longwood, Daw End Branch) • “The Dilke” (west of Longwood, Daw End Branch) • “The Dilke” (west of Longwood, Daw End Branch) • “The Black Cock” (Daw End Branch) • “The Black Cock” (Daw End Branch) • “The Black Cock” (Daw End Branch) • “The Nickleodeon” (Wednesfield Jn, W&E Canal) • “The Nickleodeon” (Wednesfield Jn, W&E Canal) • “The Nickleodeon” (Wednesfield Jn, W&E Canal) • “The United Kingdom” (Wednesfield, W&E Canal) • “The United
  • Daw End Branch & Rushall Canals and Ryecroft Railway Junction An

    Daw End Branch & Rushall Canals and Ryecroft Railway Junction An

    Walsall Walkabout #2 (North East) Daw End Branch & Rushall Canals and Ryecroft Railway Junction An RCHS West Midlands Group Walk Saturday 9th September 2017 Overview Walsall Walkabout #2, - a (perhaps surprisingly) mostly rural walk - starts at Bell Bridge (Walstead Road) on the Rushall Canal: Bus #51 or X51 from Walsall Bus Station stand A/B to Walstead Road Bell Inn. The Wyrley & Essington Canal was incorporated in 1792 to connect Wolverhampton with Wyrley Bank and adjacent collieries. In fact, before the canal was completed the line up to Wyrley became a branch with the main line continuing to Birchills (north Walsall). Subsequently, the main line was extended from a junction less than half a mile north of Birchills basin to join the Coventry Canal at Huddlesford Junction which is to the east of Lichfield. There were a number of branches notably in the area around Wyrley and to the south of Cannock. The main line of the canal was opened in stages (from west to east) between 1794 and 1797. Despite the proximity of the Wyrley & Essington Canal and the BCN, and pressure from local businessmen, the two canals had no connections (apart from Horseleyfields Junction at the Wolverhampton end) until the two canal companies merged in 1840. Three such canals were completed between 1841 and 1847. The first (the Walsall Locks Branch) made the half-mile connection between the W&E at Birchills Wharf and the Walsall Canal close to its terminus at Walsall Wharf - this canal was included in our Walsall Walkabout #1 in 2016. The Rushall Canal, completed in 1847, was #3 in the sequence.
  • BCN Safe Moorings Guide

    BCN Safe Moorings Guide

    MOORING PLACES ON THE BCN WEDENSBURY OAK LOOP WALSALL CANAL BIRMINGHAM CITY CENTRE C&RT Workshop basin. Mooring has been permitted, by prior Walsall Locks Top Lock, off side K There are many excellent visitor moorings arrangement – particularly in association with their open days. Walsall Town Arm secure off side before town basin. Barclaycard Arena, National Sealife Centre & Oozells Street loop. Check with the workshop. Walsall Town Basin Between the Worcester Bar and Holliday Street Bridge. TAME VALLEY CANAL Willingsworth Hall Bridge (adjacent to Patent Shaft site). Cambrian Wharf and Gas Street basin visitor moorings. Between Lock No.11 & No.12 adjacent to park and container base. Ocker Hill moorings (just inside arm) K PUBS: Many to choose from, but the “Prince of Wales” (beside Good stretch between M6 and Lock No.7. Top of Ryders Green Locks. (off side) the ICC, on Cambridge Street) is a boaters' favourite. Perry Barr Top Lock. PUBS: "New Navigation" (Walsall Top Lock); BIRMINGHAM & FAZELEY PUBS: "Boars Head" on College Road above "Eight Locks" (Ryders Green Top Lock). Farmers Bridge top lock & Cambrian Wharf. Perry Barr Lock No.11. DUDLEY NO.1 CANAL Aston Business Park (offside between Locks 8 & 9 DAW END BRANCH & RUSHALL Black Country Museum end of Dudley Tunnel K on Aston flight). P K Longwood Boat Club towpath side Parkhead end of the Dudley Tunnel Cuckoo Wharf – at the bottom of Aston flight near Salford or on club moorings by arrangement. Some quiet spots between Parkhead and Woodside Bridge. Junction. Outside the “Manor Arms” Waterfront (Merry Hill) – moorings on hotel side of basin.
  • Post Boundary

    Post Boundary

    Boundary Edition 206 Post Autumn 2014 I was joined by Ivor Chambers & Brian Ward to meet four representatives from CRT to discuss the reed infestation on the Wednesbury Old Canal. There was Ian Lane, Acting Area Manager, Ian Derby, Maintenance Manager, Paul Wilkinson Senior Ecologist and Alex May, Environmental Scientist. Because of the known toxins in the water the cost of dredging out the reeds would be financially prohibitive at pre- sent but various considerations are being made. Brenda Ward, Chairman The Journal of the Birmingham Canal Navigations Society Free to members 50p when sold bcnsociety.com Boundary Post Autumn 2014 Edition 206 Boundary Post Autumn 2014 Edition 206 Council - 2013 - 2014 President : David Smith Vice-Presidents : Martin O’Keeffe, Ron Cousens, Phil Clayton, Cllr. David Sparks, Rob Starkey, Chairman & Boundary Post Editor BRENDA WARD Press & Publicity: [email protected] 0121 355 6351 Kath O’’Keeffe [email protected] Vice Chair & Rally Organiser BARRIE JOHNSON 0121 422 4373 Sales: [email protected] REBECCA SMITH KEARY [email protected] 01562 850234 Treasurer: DAVE DENT Health & Safety 38 Greenland Mews, London, SE8 5JW ARTHUR FARGE tel: 0121 745 4266 020 8691 9190 [email protected] email: [email protected] Secretary: & Planning Officer Supporting members to Council IVOR CAPLAN tel: 07778685764 [email protected] Talks and Presentations PHIL CLAYTON 07890921413 Membership [email protected] ALAN VENESS tel: 0121 355 4732 43 Pilkington Ave, Sutton Coldfield, B72 Work Party
  • M6 JUNCTION 10 Design and Access Statement

    M6 JUNCTION 10 Design and Access Statement

    M6 JUNCTION 10 - Highways Improvements Design and Access Statement | 1 M6 JUNCTION 10 Design and Access Statement August 2017 1 | M6 Junction 10 – Highways Improvements Design and Access Statement Contents 1. Introduction 5. Design of Development 1.1. Purpose of the Document ... 2 5.1. Introduction ... 10 1.2. Background and Introduction to Development ... 2 5.2. Design / Scheme Evolution ... 10 Introduction to M6 and J10 ... 2 Do-nothing alternative ... 10 Brief introduction of the development ... 2 Do-minimum alternative ... 10 1.3. Application Material ... 3 Strategic alternatives ... 10 Local alternatives ... 10 Design Alternatives ... 11 Design Selection Process ... 12 5.3. Proposed Development ... 13 2. Site Context 5.4. Use and amount ... 13 Scale ... 13 2.1. Location and Description ... 4 Layout ... 13 2.2. Site Movement and Access ... 4 Highway Alignment ... 17 2.3. Surrounding Uses ... 4 Structures ... 17 2.4. Site Analysis ... 5 Junction Strategy and Traffic Signalling ... 19 Heritage ... 5 Lighting Gantries and Signage ... 19 Ecology and Vegetation ... 5 Drainage ... 20 Flood Risk ... 5 Construction Compounds ... 20 2.5. Site Photos ... 6 5.7. Site Visuals ... 21 3. Planning Policy Context 6. Landscaping 3.1. Introduction ... 7 6.1. Proposed Landscaping ... 24 3.2. Planning Policy Matrix ... 7 Highway Verges within the Roundabout ... 24 Motorway Approaches ... 24 Central Reservations ... 24 6.2. Landscape Plans ... 25 4. Consultation and Engagement 7. Access Statement 4.1. Introduction ... 9 4.2. Statement of Community Involvement ... 9 7.1. Introduction ... 29 Pre-Application Meetings with Local Planning Authority (LPA) ... 9 7.2. Vehicle Access ... 29 Public Consultation ... 9 7.3. Pedestrian and Cycle access ..
  • DARLASTON (Inc

    DARLASTON (Inc

    HITCHMOUGH’S BLACK COUNTRY PUBS DARLASTON (Inc. Butcroft, Moxley, Wood's Bank) 3rd. Edition - © 2014 Tony Hitchmough. All Rights Reserved www.longpull.co.uk INTRODUCTION Well over 40 years ago, I began to notice that the English public house was more than just a building in which people drank. The customers talked and played, held trips and meetings, the licensees had their own stories, and the buildings had experienced many changes. These thoughts spurred me on to find out more. Obviously I had to restrict my field; Black Country pubs became my theme, because that is where I lived and worked. Many of the pubs I remembered from the late 1960’s, when I was legally allowed to drink in them, had disappeared or were in the process of doing so. My plan was to collect any information I could from any sources available. Around that time the Black Country Bugle first appeared; I have never missed an issue, and have found the contents and letters invaluable. I then started to visit the archives of the Black Country boroughs. Directories were another invaluable source for licensees’ names, enabling me to build up lists. The censuses, church registers and licensing minutes for some areas, also were consulted. Newspaper articles provided many items of human interest (eg. inquests, crimes, civic matters, industrial relations), which would be of value not only to a pub historian, but to local and social historians and genealogists alike. With the advances in technology in mind, I decided the opportunity of releasing my entire archive digitally, rather than mere selections as magazine articles or as a book, was too good to miss.
  • Environment Agency Plan

    Environment Agency Plan

    g A . \m a d la M>S ce?vfs- ?ox local environment agency plan WEST MIDLANDS-TAME CONSULTATION REPORT MARCH 1998 Brownhills Tamworth Wolverhampton Aldridge Sutton Coldfield Atherst Kingsbury West Bromwich Nuneaton Birrplngham Fillongley Meriden C oven Solihull B alsall Common Dorridge En v ir o n m e n t Agency Your Views What is this report about? This report is about the environment of Birmingham, Solihull, much of the Black Country and parts of Warwickshire, what we call the West Midlands - Tame area. It is all the land that drains to the River Tame up to Kingsbury, just upstream of the River Purification Lakes at Lea Marston. The report looks at the physical environment of land, air, water, wildlife and heritage. It highlights the current quality of the environment, the natural resources of the area and how they can be protected. It also identifies specific environmental problems in the area and how they can be tackled. Why should I read it? The Environment Agency wants to hear your views on the issues facing the environment of the area and what you think should be done about them. Telling us your views will enable you to contribute to environmental protection and improvement and influence what the Environment Agency and others do. We will be pleased to receive any comments that you wish to make but in particular we are very keen to know: o what you think should be done about them? o how important do you think the issues are? o What you think of our proposals? o are there problems or opportunities that we have not included? o whether you can help to tackle any of the issues.
  • Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study 2016

    Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study 2016

    Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study – Stage B Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study – Stage B Prepared for WCL Quarries Ltd Quarries House 2 Cobbett Road Burntwood Staffordshire WS7 3GL Report reference: 63918R2, July 2016 Report status: Final Confidential Prepared by ESI Ltd New Zealand House,160 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 6FD, UK Tel +44(0)1743 276100 Fax +44 (0)1743 248600 email [email protected] Registered office: New Zealand House, 160 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 6FD. Registered in England and Wales, number 3212832 Lichfield Canal Water Supply Study – Stage B This report has been prepared by ESI Ltd. (ESI) in its professional capacity as soil and groundwater specialists, with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the agreed scope and terms of contract and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with its client, and is provided by ESI solely for the internal use of its client. In respect of this report the financing client is WCL. The client / user group for this report is The Lichfield and Hatherton Canal Restoration Trust (LHCRT). The advice and opinions in this report should be read and relied on only in the context of the report as a whole, taking account of the terms of reference agreed with the client. The findings are based on the information made available to ESI at the date of the report (and will have been assumed to be correct) and on current UK standards, codes, technology and practices as at that time. They do not purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion.