This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain.

Dividing the Water: Basic Precepts of River Water Law 1

2 David L. Hegner

The extent of riparian vegetation development along the rivers and streams which comprise the System is a function of a myriad of legal and operational factors. The utilization of Colorado River water can be identified with several key issues, federal acts, and treaties. This paper ~vill outline the major arguements and perceptions which define the present day levels of water and hence the extent of riparian vegetation along the river corridors of the Colorado River System.

INTRODUCTION Thff main objective of this paper is to outline the legal and operational decisions and constraints The "Law of the River" as applied to the Colorado whith define the flow levels that have shaped and River, has evolved out of a combination of both continue to regulate the extent of the riparian Fedeual and State statutes, inter-state compacts, community. court decisions, contracts, an international treaty, operating criteria, and administrative decisions. Prior to exploring the law of the Colorado River, The cummulative effect of all these apportionments it is necessary to understand the underlying logic have defined the development and extent of the which defines ~·Jestern r1ater law. Specifically, the riparian vegetation along the river corridors of "appropriated right'" to water and the percieved the Colorado River System. neces-sity to hold the right to water use have defined the entire development of water in the The Colorado River begins its journey in the moun­ \Vest. Hhen the first settlers made their way into tains of Colorado and flows nearly 1400 miles before the Basin, they quickly realized that the key to it terminates in the Gulf of . The development and control centered around who had Colorado River is the second longest river in the the ultimate control of the water. In contrast to and holds the dubious distinction of the water law of the East, the developers initiated being the most closely regulated of the major rivers. a reservation system of water that defined that The 900 mile long basin can be seperated into two use had to be beneficial to development and in distinct basins: the Upper Basin, consisting of most cases led to complete diversion from the portions of Hyoming, Colorado, and New ; river channel. Since water 'vas of very limited and the Lower Basin, consisting of portions of supply, the user had to hold a legal right to , and California. Numerous Federal, beneficially utilize the 'vater. The right was State, and private water projects utilize the river allocated on a first in time logic and as such basin water both directly and indirectly. For the the first ones on the scene laid claim to the period of time from 1976 through 1980, the states primary use of the water and were defined as the of the Colorado River Basin collectively utilized "senior"' holders. The initial users over 15 million acre-feet of water (BOR, 1984). of the river generally gained the major control of the water resource, With this basic concept in mind, the remainder of the paper will outline some of the major development issues associated with 1 Paper presented at the North American tha Colorado River. Riparian Symposium. Tucson, Arizona, April 16-18, 19"85. EARLY DEVELOPMENT (PRE-1900) 2 Grand Canyon Study Manager, U.S. Bureau o f Reclamation, Division ·Of Water and Land, Salt The first non-native irrigators in the Colorado Lake City, Utah 84147 River Basin were the Jesuit missionaries in the Tucson area around 1732 (U,S. Dept. Int., 1946). After the Civil 1-lar had ended, a number of people began to move into the Colorado River Basin and specifically the California and Arizona areas.

453 Thomas Blythe recorded the first use of Colorado 1925 TO PRESENT River water for irrigation purposes in the Palo Verde Valley in 1856 (U.S. Dep~. Int., 1946) By With the passage of the Compact, the Lower Basin 1877, Blythe made the first legal filing for immediately took advantage of several studies Colorado River water in California. Within this investigating mainstem storage and irrigation The same time period of the late 1800's, the Mormon Kincaid Act (1924) and the Fall-Davis Report (1922) pioneers were developing and designing extensive documented the need for flood control and storage irrigation works in Hyoming, Colorado, and Utah. to provide water for the of south­ By 1883, the Grand Valley had been built and ern California (U.S. Dept. Int., 1978). Out of was supplying irrigation water to a large area of these studies, irrigation were recommended the Western Slope area of Colorado. for the Imperial Valley and the need was seen to develop a storage in the Lower Basin, These and other recommendations led to the Federal govern­ 1900 TO 1925 ment pass·ing the Boulder Canyon Project A'ct in 1928. This· Act provided for the building of In the history of the Colorado River water develop­ and the definition of the amount of water that ment, the early 1900's were the most significant. California could legally utilize. To finance the During this period, the use of water in the Lower project, irrigation and hydroelectric power contracts Basin had reached the maximum possible without the were initiated to repay the development over time. development of extensive storage and regulation. The major component of the Boulder Canyon Project The passage of the Reclamation Act of 1902 signaled Act, Hoover Dam, was completed in 1935. the beginning of the investigations. into to feas­ ibility of building large regulation and irrigation The country of Mexico became concerned that the works in the West. Several reports and studies were development in the United States would utilize all conducted and analyzed. Several of these plans led of the Colorado River water before it had a chance to the development of the modern day Bureau of to get to Hexico, In 1944, a treaty was signed Reclamation. between the United States and Mexico to provide on an annual basis, a quantity of 1,500,000 acre­ By the 1920's, the development of the Upper B.asin feet of water to be supplied to Mexico, The treaty was considerably lagging behind that of the Lower required that ~1exico construct a diversion struct­ Basin. However, mainstem development in both basins. ure and that the United States would build the was impeded by the lack of storage facilities, water Davis storage dam and for regulatory shortages, and the continual threat of floods and and flood control purposes. the aggravated siltation problems. During this time period, several public and private agencies and In 1948, the Upper Basin States entered into a groups were seeking the rights to develop hydro­ compact of their own defining'· individual state electric power and were proposing to provide storage percentages of water available for development and and flood control on only an incidental basis. established a commission to explore the potential These recommendations were analyzed, but the Upper for developing water and irrigation projects within Basin states regarded any development in the Lower the Upper Basin. After numerous studies and Basin as threatening to their established priorities investigations, the federal government, at the to the water and could preclude future use of the insistance and pushing of the rpper Basin states, resource. The states thought that they s.hould passed the Colorado River Storage Act of 1956. The control the use of water within their own states, major features of this act were to provide for the but the Federal government claimed the ultimate development of four major storage projects within jurisdiction over the water based on it being an the Upper Basin ( Glen Canyon, Flaming Gorge, interstate waterway. Some form of agreement was the three of the Currecanti Unit, and obviously needed before any comprehensive develop­ Navajo)J for the establishment of repayment contracts ment of the Colorado River Basin could proceed. for the structures and for the future development The Lower Basin favored a compact becaus.e they of other storage and irrigation features within the desired to enlist the support of the Upper Rasin basin. Glen Canyon Dam was initiated in 1956 and states in securing federal legislation for main-­ completed in 1963. The primary purpose of Glen stem development. The Upper Basin states favored Canyon Dam and Lake Powell is for the regulation any type of decision which would secure their of water to the Lower Basin and to provide for rights to future development of the water. Thes:e hydro~owe~ revenues for the Upper Basin. concerns and hopes were consumated through. the development and passage of the Colorado River As the m~in features of the Colorado River Storage Compact in December of 1922. The divisi.on point Act were being built , the State of Arizona was between the basins was set at Lees Ferry, Ariioha pushing for the full recognition of their water and it was determined (based on existing annual rights and to restrict California from excessive flow information) that the Upper; Basin must guar­ us·age of the the Colorado River water. California antee to the Lower Basin statesl an aggregate of had been developing and expanding far faster than 75,000,000 acre-feet of water for any period of any other s·tate of the Colorado River Basin and te~ consecutive years. The passage of the Colorado has: 5.een utilizing any excess water that ~.vas not River Compact cleared the way for legislation that utilized by the other states. This worried the authorized the constuction of major water projects other States and still is a sore point in regards and removed a major cause of rivalry between the to future development. Several legal scuffles over two basins. these rights and future usage were entered into

454 and led to the legal definition of how much water traints which ultimately control the quantity and Arizona and California were legally entitled to. quality of the river water. To say that the Once the legal aspects were resoled, the State development of the water resources of the Colorado of Arizona quickly pushed for the development and River Basin is complex would be an understatement. funding of the Central Arizona Project for irrig­ Before any thought can be given to future changes ation and municipal and industrial water for the that will occur along the vegetation corridors, state. In 1968, the Colorado River Basin Project it is necessary to understand the precepts and Act was passed which authorized the Central attitudes which define and limit the amounts of Arizona Project, defined priority rights, author­ water available. This paper was not intended to ized the Navajo Generation Station, established define every decision point that has been reached the Mexican Water Treaty as a national obligation, in the regulation of the Colorado River. Instead and established the need to define operating the intent was to define the major decisions and criteria between the basins. Operating criteria logic patterns which shape the Colorado River of were developed between the basins and were based today. on the legal needs of the Colorado River Compact, the Mexican Water Treaty, and the need to maintain parity between the levels of Lake Powell and . LITERATURE CITED SUMMARY U.S. Department of the Interior. 1946, The Water holds the. key to the development of the Colorado River. Planning Report No. 34- resources of th~ Colorado River B~sin. In very 8-2. 392 p. simplistic terms, it represents the "critical" element in any development that has occurred. The U.S. Department of the Interior. 1978. Updating development of the riparian vegetation that occurs the Hoover Dam Documents. along the Colorado River Basin corridors, is the result of the amount of water that has his.torically U.S. Department of the Interior. 1984, Operation and is currently available. The vegetation is of the Colorado River Basin~ 1983 Project regulated by the legal and jurisdictional cons- Operation. 32p.

455