Water Use Conflicts in the West: Implications of Reforming the Bureau of Reclamation’S Water Supply Policies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Use Conflicts in the West: Implications of Reforming the Bureau of Reclamation’S Water Supply Policies WATER USE CONFLICTS IN THE WEST: IMPLICATIONS OF REFORMING THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION’S WATER SUPPLY POLICIES AUGUST 1997 The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office Preface onflict among water users is part of the history of the American West. The conflicts have changed over the years but have not gone away. Environmentalists, who want C water to be left in the rivers to preserve threatened species, are now competing with urban and agricultural users for the West's limited water resources. Native American water rights, long ignored, are also receiving more attention. The federal government is a key player in western water. Through its Bureau of Reclama- tion, the government developed water supplies that literally made the desert bloom. Develop- ing new sources of water&deciding where the next big water project should be built&has long been the focus of the Bureau of Reclamation. But good options for the large-scale projects are extremely limited, and the federal government now focuses more on the fair and efficient allocation and use of existing supplies. Policy changes that could lead to better use of water are being put in place in parts of California served by the Central Valley Project, the largest water supply project in the United States. Policy changes introduced in California could serve as models for changes throughout the West. In response to a request from the Ranking Minority Member of the House Committee on Resources, this study analyzes the policy tools slated for use in California, estimates the costs of those reforms to agriculture in the state, and discusses the implications of using those policy tools in the rest of the West. Marca Weinberg, formerly of the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO's) Natural Re- sources and Commerce Division, wrote the study under the supervision of Jan Paul Acton and Roger Hitchner. Gary Brown, Coleman Bazelon, and Teri Gullo of CBO; Doug Elmendorf and Aaron Zeisler, formerly of CBO; and Gregory Amacher, Richard Wahl, Daniel Hellerstein, Benjamin Simon, Dennis Wichelns, Noel Gollehon, and Amy Matthews-Amos provided valuable comments and assistance. Michael R. Moore helped develop the agricul- tural model and also provided general comments. Sherry Snyder edited the manuscript, and Chris Spoor proofread it. Angela McCollough typed the many drafts. Kathryn Quattrone and Jill Sands prepared the study for publication. June E. O'Neill Director August 1997 Contents SUMMARY ix ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 The Changing Federal Role 2 Assessing Reform Efforts with a Case Study 2 TWO WATER USE IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES 5 Types of Water Use 5 Conflicts Over Water Use in the West 8 The Role of the Bureau of Reclamation in Developing Water Supplies 11 THREE ISSUES IN REFORMING FEDERAL WATER POLICY 15 Tools for Reforming Federal Water Policy 15 Implications of Policy Combinations: Interactions and Redundancies 23 Matching Reform Objectives with Policy Tools 24 FOUR WATER DEVELOPMENT, USE, CONFLICTS, AND REFORM IN CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL VALLEY 27 The Central Valley Project and Its Stakeholders 27 The Central Valley Project Improvement Act 33 The Regulatory Environment for Implementing the CVPIA 38 FIVE QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT IMPROVEMENT ACT 41 Empirical Framework 42 Results of the Empirical Analysis 44 Environmental Benefits and Issues in Estimating Their Values 52 vi WATER USE CONFLICTS IN THE WEST August 1997 SIX LESSONS FOR THE WEST 55 Regional Differences in Variables That Influence Farmers' Response to Reform 56 The Role of Key Variables as Predictors of Farmers' Response to Water Supply Policies 57 A Role for Flexibility 65 APPENDIXES A The Central Valley Project Improvement Act 69 B The Economics of Tools for Reforming Federal Water Policy 75 CONTENTS vii TABLES 1. Diversion of Surface Water for Various Uses in Western and Eastern United States, 1990 6 2. Potential Effectiveness of Selected Policy Tools for Alternative Conflicts and Reform Objectives 24 3. Selected Crops Produced with Water from the Central Valley Project as a Percentage of Total U.S. Production, 1987 28 4. Effect of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act on Agricultural Water Use and Revenues 44 5. Effect of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act on Urban Water Use 45 6. Ranking of Crops in the Bureau of Reclamation's Five Regions, by Acreage and Revenues, 1990 61 7. Regions' Dependence on Water Deliveries by the Bureau of Reclamation, 1989-1990 62 A-1. Applicable Charges to Finance the Restoration Fund, by Type of Water Use 72 viii WATER USE CONFLICTS IN THE WEST August 1997 FIGURES 1. Water Projects and Agricultural Regions of California's Central Valley 30 2. Cost of Environmental Water Allocations Under Average Water Supply Conditions, as Measured by Reductions in Agricultural Revenues 47 3. Total Amount of Water Delivered by the Central Valley Project, 1949-1995 50 4. The Bureau of Reclamation's Five Regions in the Western United States 56 5. Average Gross Revenues from Crops Irrigated with Water from the Bureau of Reclamation's Projects in 1990, by State 58 6. Agricultural Land Values for Irrigated and Dryland Uses in 1988, by State 59 7. Average Amount of Water Delivered to Districts in 1989 and 1990, by Region 64 B-1. The Effects of a Water Market on a Farmer's Decisions About Water Use 76 B-2. The Effects of Tiered Water Prices and a Water Market on a Farmer's Decisions About Water Use 78 B-3. Water Prices and Quantities with a Water Market and an Allocation for Fish and Wildlife 80 B-4. Water Prices and Quantities with CVPIA Provisions 82 BOXES 1. Water Districts 12 2. Terms Relating to Water Prices 21 3. Using Changes in Gross Revenues as a Measure of the Impact of Water Policy Reform on Agriculture 43 Summary he Bureau of Reclamation, an agency within the to analyze the magnitudes of costs and benefits that Department of the Interior, has spent billions of reform imposes on the agricultural and urban sectors in T dollars over the past 90 years to develop water California and to explore the implications of policy re- supplies for farmers in the western United States. form for the Bureau of Reclamation's projects through- Those federal water projects have "made the desert out the West. bloom," but the bureau's policies on supplying wa- ter—including subsidized prices, long-term contracts, and restrictions on the sale of water by farmers—have resulted in a rigid allocation of major water resources to Competition for Limited agriculture. That allocation often comes at the expense of urban, environmental, and Native American water Water Resources in the West users, and at a large cost to taxpayers. Conflicts over current and future allocations of surface Reform of federal water policies that have their water resources exist throughout the western United roots in the early part of the century could improve the States. Those conflicts typically involve historical pat- Bureau of Reclamation's ability to meet the demands of terns of use by irrigated agriculture on the one hand and today. Properly done, reform could improve economic increasing (or increasingly recognized) needs for urban efficiency in allocating water among commercial water and environmental uses on the other hand. Many uses, provide more water for public purposes such as western cities—including Los Angeles, Denver, and the environment or Native American tribes, and could Las Vegas—are experiencing rapid population growth address equity concerns regarding the portion of project that will increase pressure on water supplies that are costs that the federal government must pay. both uncertain and limited. Fish and wildlife species that depend on river ecosystems for their survival are In California, where conflicts between agriculture, declining in every major river basin in the West. A to- cities, and environmental interests over scarce water tal of 184 species listed as threatened or endangered or resources are severe, reform has been brought about by proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act the 1992 Central Valley Project Improvement Act may be affected by the Bureau of Reclamation's opera- (CVPIA). In designing and passing the CVPIA, the tions. In addition, the water rights of many Native Congress created a potential model for reforming fed- American tribes have yet to be quantified and allocated. eral water policy. The act contains numerous provi- sions that encourage farmers who receive water from Historically, increased demand for water has been the Bureau of Reclamation's Central Valley Project met by developing additional supplies. However, rising (CVP) to use less, that facilitate the movement of con- economic costs and environmental sensitivities are served water to higher-valued uses, and that protect and likely to preclude future construction of major water enhance fish and wildlife populations in California's supply projects. Instead, reallocating water from exist- Central Valley. However, those reforms come at a cost ing uses—primarily agriculture—may be the best to agriculture. Passage of the act creates an opportunity x WATER USE CONFLICTS IN THE WEST August 1997 "new" supply of water for addressing urban, environ- dress economically inefficient water allocations, envi- mental, and Native American needs. ronmental problems associated with water develop- ment, tribal claims to water rights, reimbursement to the federal Treasury, or any combination of those ob- jectives. Broadly defined, the available policy tools The Role of the Bureau of include facilitating water markets, directly increasing water prices, directly reallocating water, and requiring Reclamation in Resolving that water conservation measures be carried out. Water markets, water price reform, and conservation programs Water Conflicts are tools that create incentives for farmers to reduce the quantity of water used in agriculture. Allowing farmers Participation by the Bureau of Reclamation will be nec- to sell water forces them to consider its value in other essary to alleviate water conflicts in many areas of the uses when making decisions about using water.
Recommended publications
  • Riparian Ecosystems and Their Management: Reconciling
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Dividing the Water: Basic Precepts of Colorado River Water Law 1 2 David L. Hegner The extent of riparian vegetation development along the rivers and streams which comprise the Colorado River System is a function of a myriad of legal and operational factors. The utilization of Colorado River water can be identified with several key issues, federal acts, and treaties. This paper ~vill outline the major arguements and perceptions which define the present day levels of water and hence the extent of riparian vegetation along the river corridors of the Colorado River System. INTRODUCTION Thff main objective of this paper is to outline the legal and operational decisions and constraints The "Law of the River" as applied to the Colorado whith define the flow levels that have shaped and River, has evolved out of a combination of both continue to regulate the extent of the riparian Fedeual and State statutes, inter-state compacts, community. court decisions, contracts, an international treaty, operating criteria, and administrative decisions. Prior to exploring the law of the Colorado River, The cummulative effect of all these apportionments it is necessary to understand the underlying logic have defined the development and extent of the which defines ~·Jestern r1ater law. Specifically, the riparian vegetation along the river corridors of "appropriated right'" to water and the percieved the Colorado River System. neces-sity to hold the right to water use have defined the entire development of water in the The Colorado River begins its journey in the moun­ \Vest.
    [Show full text]
  • Awwa Ca/Nv Section Water Conservation Training and Certification Program “Need to Know” Criteria for Level 1
    AWWA CA/NV SECTION WATER CONSERVATION TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM “NEED TO KNOW” CRITERIA FOR LEVEL 1 The “Need to Know” criteria” presented below is based upon the general knowledge requirements expected for level 1 AWWA CA/NV water conservation certification and focuses on water end uses and conservation measures and on regional water issues and resources. Terms and definitions associated with the subjects discussed below. Units of measurement and formulas. Basic units (English) of measurement used in the water industry and formulas for landscape water use and budgets. Examples are Cubic Foot and Acre Foot, Arithmetic such as Multiplication Division and percentages, volume, pressure (psi). U.S. Water Resource Facts; Federal, Nevada and California Water Providers and Regulators; Regional water issues; Professional associations. Different types of water providers in U.S. and primary source of water for average U.S. water providers. Knowledge of water supply from groundwater and surface water in California and Nevada. Agricultural and urban demand in California and Nevada. Sources of water in California. Sources of water for Nevada Colorado River water rights; Type of water agencies in California. Roles of Federal Nevada and California water agencies and regulators. Agricultural and urban MOU and Best Management Practices; Urban Water Management Plans; California water issues including CALFED and Bay-Delta; and professional associations (including California Urban Water Council, ANSI and ASME). Utility water demand characteristics and water conservation measures. Important utility water use data and customer demand characteristics; long-term versus short-term conservation programs; utility conservation measures; type and accuracy of water meters; quantity-based rate structures; unaccounted-for water; water system audits and leak detection; system water pressure: and recycled water.
    [Show full text]
  • Water in California
    CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY CALIFORNIA HISTORY SECTION RESEARCH GUIDES WATER IN CALIFORNIA VISIT US California History Section 900 N Street Room 200 9:30-4 Monday-Friday 2 Are you a California resident? Have you eaten California produce? Then you are affected by California’s history of water resources development. From dams, to canals to flumes and groundwater replenishment, water planning affects almost every aspect of California life and industry. Explore the vibrant political history of California’s most precious resource via the California History Section's rich collections! Digitized Resources ………………………………..………………4 Reference Works: Books…………....……….……………………………………..5 Periodicals…………….....……………………………………...8 Manuscript Collections…....……………………………………..9 Photograph Albums……....……………………………………..11 Search: Catalog General Research Tips.…………………………………..12 Subject-Specific Resources in our Catalog.………………………..13 County-Specific Resources in our Catalog.………………………..14 On-site Research Resources….…...……………………………..15 Other On-site Resources….……...……………………………..16 Other Places to Look….….……….……..……………………..17 Enjoy Your Research! 3 Can’t come to the library just yet? No worries! There are a number of online resources you can explore related to water in California! Digitized Publications A few years ago we digitized some of our more fragile resources on California’s water. You can see them on Internet Archive! URL: https://archive.org/ Type in Search Box: (water* OR irrigation) AND collection:(californiastatelibrary)&sin=TXT Select Option: “Search full text of books” Digitized Images We have scanned and digitized a portion of our image collection. Check them out and remember that we have a lot more in the library. URL: https://calisphere.org/institution/51/ items/ Type in Search Box: ( (water) OR (irrig*) OR (dams)) 4 Unsure about where to start? Consult a book! If you are interested in the history of California’s water resources, these items will point you in the right direction.
    [Show full text]
  • California Water & Sierra Nevada Hydrology
    - Adaptive management - California water & Sierra Nevada hydrology - SNRI & UC Merced Roger Bales Sierra Nevada Research Institute UC Merced Forest adaptive management: water 3 objectives: Measure changes in water quality & water budget in representative areas subjected to Framework/SPLATS treatment Estimate the impact of forest treatments on water quality, water budget & aquatic habitat at three levels: watershed, forest, bioregion Provide basis for continuing operational assessment of how Framework treatments will impact streams, water cycle & forest health Sierra Nevada Adaptive Management Program snamp.cnr.berkeley.edu Tasks: Water Quality & Quantity Field measurement program – before/after treatment – controls in parallel w/ treatment – stream temperature, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity – stream stage/discharge, soil moisture – meteorology, erosion, soil temperature, snowpack, precipitation Modeling & spatial scaling – integrate observations using hydrologic model – estimate model parameters from satellite & ground data – extend impacts across hydrologic & watershed conditions – couple watershed, erosion, stream responses Sierra Nevada Adaptive Management Program snamp.cnr.berkeley.edu Tahoe NF catchments Hydrology focuses on 3 smaller catchments: − treatment − control − higher elevation, future treatment Same strategy in Sierra NF California’s water resources challenges: increasing pressure on mountain resources 1. Changing urban & agricultural water demand 2. Sea level rise 3. Reduction of average annual snowpack
    [Show full text]
  • Water Availability for Cannabis in Northern California: Intersections of Climate, Policy, and Public Discourse
    water Article Water Availability for Cannabis in Northern California: Intersections of Climate, Policy, and Public Discourse Betsy Morgan 1,2,* , Kaitlyn Spangler 2,3 , Jacob Stuivenvolt Allen 2,4 , Christina N. Morrisett 2,5 , Mark W. Brunson 2,3,6 , Shih-Yu Simon Wang 2,4 and Nancy Huntly 2,6,7 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 2 Climate Adaptation Science Program, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA; [email protected] (K.S.); [email protected] (J.S.A.); [email protected] (C.N.M.); [email protected] (M.W.B.); [email protected] (S.-Y.S.W.); [email protected] (N.H.) 3 Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 4 Department of Plant, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 5 Department of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 6 Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 7 Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Availability of water for irrigated crops is driven by climate and policy, as moderated by public priorities and opinions. We explore how climate and water policy interact to influence water availability for cannabis (Cannabis sativa), a newly regulated crop in California, as well as how public discourse frames these interactions. Grower access to surface water covaries with pre- cipitation frequency and oscillates consistently in an energetic 11–17 year wet-dry cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Available for Replenishment
    State Water Project and Central Valley Project: Reliability and Availability Water Available for Replenishment Appendix B. State Water Project and Central Valley Project: Reliability and Availability 1 State Water Project and Central Valley Project: Reliability and Availability This page left blank intentionally. 2 State Water Project and Central Valley Project: Reliability and Availability Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Background on the Central Valley Project and State Water Project ............................................................ 4 Regulations Governing Operation of the CVP and SWP ............................................................................... 7 State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1485 .......................................................................... 8 Coordinated Operations Agreement .................................................................................................... 8 Water Right Order 90-5 ........................................................................................................................ 8 Central Valley Project Improvement Act .............................................................................................. 8 1995 Bay-Delta Water Quality Control Plan and State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1641 .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Water and the Rhetoric of Crisis
    UC Berkeley Berkeley Planning Journal Title California Water and the Rhetoric of Crisis Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gg4203t Journal Berkeley Planning Journal, 23(1) ISSN 1047-5192 Author Pollak, Josh Publication Date 2010 DOI 10.5070/BP32318173 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California 1 California Water and the Rhetoric of Crisis By Josh Pollak Abstract Water management in California has always been politically charged and fraught with controversy. In the summer of 2009, the last year of a three-year drought, a specific type of “water crisis” emerged in political rhetoric, in which constructing new dams and lifting protections for endangered fish species could solve California’s water problems. This piece critically examines these claims by presenting a brief background on how water is used and managed in California, highlighting the disconnect between the cost to deliver water and the price users pay, and explaining misconceptions that led endangered species protections to be attacked. California needs to take a proactive stance in water management by examining how water is currently allocated, reforming our water rights system, and dealing with difficult water issues before they reach a “crisis” level. Keywords: Water crisis; California water; water management; water infrastructure; water allocation “California’s water system is in a crisis.” -Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) “Our water crisis underscores the urgent need to update California’s water infrastructure so we are able to capture excess rain in wet years and have the necessary reserves in dry years like this one.” -California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, February 2009 “The San Joaquin Valley continues to face a water crisis in which our water supplies have become inadequate to meet expanding needs .
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Water in California
    Saving Water in California California is a mosaic of diverse culture, climate, and geography from its hot, dry deserts to its snowcapped peaks and foggy shores. The state’s varying water needs and resources are both a reflection and a consequence of this diversity. Balancing water supply and demand is a perennial problem for California. This has made the state a national leader in water efficiency and conservation initiatives. SOURCES OF WATER California relies on three main, interconnected water sources: mountain snowpack, reservoirs, and aquifers:1 • The Sierra Nevada snowpack, which melts in the spring and summer, provides runoff to rivers and reservoirs. In normal years, melted snowpack typically supplies about 30 percent of the state’s water supply.2 • The state’s reservoirs store water from precipitation events and receive the runoff from melting snowpack. Less precipitation and snowpack results in decreased reservoir storage. • When the supply of surface water is unable to meet 2011 demand, groundwater is pumped from aquifers, accounting for nearly 60 percent of the state’s water supply in a dry year.3 SUPPLY ISSUES • Beginning in 2012, California experienced not only its driest three consecutive years, but also historically high temperatures. This resulted in well­ below-average snowpack. A survey of the Sierra Nevada snowpack in April 2015, when snowpack is typically highest, revealed that there was no snow.2 • Due to declining snowpack, the supply of water in the state’s reservoirs has also decreased. In August 2015, the major reservoirs were at 17 to 62 percent 2014 of their historical average storage levels.4 Drought conditions have caused water levels in California’s • As a result, Californians have increased their Lake Oroville to consistently decline over the years, as seen reliance on groundwater, causing the depletion of by the change in visible land surroundings highlighted above aquifers.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Amendments to the 1994 Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins The Third Edition of the Basin Plan was adopted by the Central Valley Water Board on 9 December 1994, approved by the State Water Board on 16 February 1995 and approved by the Office of Administrative Law on 9 May 1995. The Fourth Edition of the Basin Plan was the 1998 reprint of the Third Edition incorporating amendments adopted and approved between 1994 and 1998. The Basin Plan is in a loose-leaf format to facilitate the addition of amendments. The Basin Plan can be kept up-to-date by inserting the pages that have been revised to include subsequent amendments. The date subsequent amendments are adopted by the Central Valley Water Board will appear at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, all pages will be dated 1 September 1998. Basin plan amendments adopted by the Regional Central Valley Water Board must be approved by the State Water Board and the Office of Administrative Law. If the amendment involves adopting or revising a standard which relates to surface waters it must also be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [40 CFR Section 131(c)].
    [Show full text]
  • Cvp Overview
    Central Valley Project Overview Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation Table Of Contents The Central Valley Project ......................................................2 About the Author .............................................................15 Bibliography ................................................................16 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................16 Government Documents .................................................16 Books ................................................................17 Articles...............................................................17 Interviews.............................................................17 Dissertations...........................................................17 Other ................................................................17 Index ......................................................................18 1 The Central Valley Project Throughout his political life, Thomas Jefferson contended the United States was an agriculturally based society. Agriculture may be king, but compared to the queen, Mother Nature, it is a weak monarch. Nature consistently proves to mankind who really controls the realm. The Central Valley of California is a magnificent example of this. The Sacramento River watershed receives two-thirds to three-quarters of northern California's precipitation though it only has one-third to one-quarter of the land. The San Joaquin River watershed occupies two- thirds to three-quarter of northern California's land,
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Assessment of the Sacramento River Basin, California Water Quality of Fixed Sites, 1996-1998
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Assessment of the Sacramento River Basin, California Water Quality of Fixed Sites, 1996-1998 Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4247 cience for a channina world Water-Quality Assessment of the Sacramento River Basin, California Water Quality of Fixed Sites, 1996-1998 6/Joseph L Domagalskl and Peter D. Dileanis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4247 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM tn CNI i o CO CVJ CO Sacramento, California 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 Placer Hall Denver, CO 80225-0286 6000 J Street Sacramento, California 95819-6129 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey Improve understanding of the primary (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the natural and human factors that affect earth resources of the Nation and to provide informa­ water-quality conditions. tion that will assist resource managers and policymak- This information will help support the development ers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound and evaluation of management, regulatory, and moni­ decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and toring decisions by other Federal, State, and local trends is an important part of this overall mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Use in California MAY 2019 Jeffrey Mount, Ellen Hanak
    Water Use in California MAY 2019 Jeffrey Mount, Ellen Hanak Water in California is shared across three main sectors. Statewide, average water use is roughly 50% environmental, 40% agricultural, and 10% urban, although the percentage of water use by sector varies dramatically across regions and between wet and dry years. Some of the water used by each of these sectors returns to rivers and groundwater basins where it can be used again. Environmental water provides multiple benefits. Environmental water use falls into four categories: water in rivers protected as “wild and scenic” under federal and state laws, water required for maintaining habitat within streams, water that supports wetlands within wildlife preserves, and water needed to maintain water quality for agricultural and urban use. Half of California’s environmental water use occurs in rivers along the state’s north coast. These waters are largely isolated from major agricultural and urban areas, and their wild and scenic status protects them from significant future development. In dry years, the share of water that goes to the environment decreases dramatically as flows diminish in rivers and streams. At the height of the 2012‒16 drought, the state also reduced water allocations for the environment to reserve some supplies for farms and cities. Agricultural water use is falling, while the economic value of farm production is growing. More than nine million acres of farmland in California are irrigated, representing roughly 80% of all water used for businesses and homes. Higher-revenue perennial crops—nuts, grapes, and other fruit—have increased as a share of irrigated acreage (from 16% in 1980 to 33% in 2015 statewide, and from 21% to 45% in the southern Central Valley).
    [Show full text]