C Rim E Prevention Through Environm Ental D Esign

Prepared for: Sirius Developments Pty Ltd Date: 21 October 2020

2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) State Significant Development Application (SSD-10384) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Project and report Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design

Date 21 October 2020

Client Sirius Developments Pty Ltd

Document no. \\architectus.local\DFS\Projects\180012.00\ Docs\C_Client\CPTED

Version and date issued Issue A (Internal Draft) - 24 July 2020 Issue B (Draft for Client review) - 31 July 2020 Issue C (Final Issue) - 21 October 2020 Report contact Jane Anderson Senior Urban Planner, Urban Design and Planning This report is considered a draft unless signed by a Director or Principal

Greg Burgon Principal, Urban Design and Planning, Architectus

Architectus Australia Holdings Pty Ltd. ABN 90 131 245 684

Nominated Architect Managing Director Ray Brown NSWARB 6359

Adelaide Lower Ground Floor 57 Wyatt Street Adelaide SA 5000 Australia T +61 8 8427 7300 [email protected]

Melbourne Level 25, 385 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia T +61 3 9429 5733 F +61 3 9429 8480 [email protected]

Perth QV1 Upper Plaza West 250 St. Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Australia T +61 8 9412 8355 [email protected]

Sydney Level 18, MLC Centre 19 Martin Place Sydney NSW 2000 Australia T +61 2 8252 8400 F +61 2 8252 8600 [email protected] architectus.com.au Contents

Executive Summary 6

1 Introduction 7 1.1 Purpose of this report 8 1.2 Background 8 1.3 Site and context 8 1.4 Local context 8 1.5 Proposed development 11 1.6 Approval strategy 11 1.7 Authorship 11 1.8 Report structure 11

2 CPTED Principles 13 2.1 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles 14 2.2 Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 15

3 Crime Profile 16 3.1 Overview 17 3.2 The Rocks community profile 17 3.3 Local crime profile 18 3.4 Analysis of crime profile 22

4 Design Assessment 23 4.1 Overview 24 4.2 Architectural drawings and reference documents 24 4.3 Cumberland Street frontage and Cumberland Street forecourt 25 4.4 Through-site link 27 4.5 Northern pocket park 29 4.6 Gloucester Walk 31

5 Conclusion and recommendations 33 5.1 Conclusion 34 5.2 Recommendations 35 Figures

Figure 1. Local context map 9 Figure 2. Image of Gloucester Walk 10 Figure 4. Image of Atherden Street and the Sirius building 10 Figure 3. Image of Gloucester Walk and the Sirius building 10 Figure 5. Image of Cumberland Street and the Sirius building 10 Figure 6. Photomontage of the proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius site 12 Figure 8. Photomontage of the proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius site 12 Figure 7. Photomontage of the proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius site 12 Figure 9. Incidents of assault (non-domestic) from April 2019 to March 2020 18 Figure 10. Natural surveillance of Cumberland Street frontage and Cumberland Street forecourt 25 Figure 11. Natural surveillance of the through-site link 27 Figure 12. Section drawing of the through-site link 28 Figure 13. Natural surveillance of the northern pocket-park 29 Figure 14. Elevation of the northern pocket-park demonstrating the level change to Gloucester Walk below 30 Figure 15. Natural surveillance of Gloucester Walk 31 Figure 16. Photomontage of the proposed Sirius site 35 Figure 17. Crime Hotspot Map - Break and Enter Dwelling 37 Figure 18. Crime Hotspot Map - Break and Enter Non-dwelling 37 Figure 19. Crime Hotspot Map - Domestic Assault 38 Figure 20. Crime Hotspot Map - Non-domestic Assault 38 Figure 21. Crime Hotspot Map - Motor Vehicle Theft 39 Figure 22. Crime Hotspot Map - Steal from a Motor Vehicle 39 Figure 23. Crime Hotspot Map - Steal from a Dwelling 40 Figure 24. Crime Hotspot Map - Steal from a Person 40 Figure 25. Crime Hotspot Map - Malicious Damage to Property 41 Tables

Table 1. Crime incidence profile for The Rocks, Sydney LGA 19 Table 2. List of Architectural and Landscape Plans 43 Executive Summary

Introduction crime incidence in The Rocks area. – Safety, risk and crime analysis: review of the area was This Crime Prevention through Environmental Design undertaken to extract relevant data from the NSW (CPTED) Report has been prepared by Architectus on Bureau of Crime Statistics to gauge current issues in behalf of Sirius Developments Pty Ltd (the Proponent) in the local area. relation to the site at 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks, Sydney (‘Sirius site’). – Review of architectural and landscape plans: the proposed development plans were assessed against The proposed development is for the restoration and the CPTED principles, taking into consideration the refurbishment of the existing Sirius building, including local context, community profile and local crime alterations and additions. The existing building is proposed occurrence. to be substantially retained and restored, with new – Development strategies: as a result of the above, residential additions added to the existing structure in strategies to inform the proposed future development appropriate locations and new buildings for commercial of the site were developed to enhance safety and uses added at the Cumberland Street and Gloucester Walk security and mitigate opportunities for crime or frontages of the site. Significant attempts have been made antisocial behaviour. to improve the safety, security and amenity of the building through this process. Recommendations The proposed development is classified as State Significant Development (SSD) on the basis that it falls Recommendations outlined within this report aim to within the requirements of Clause 6 of Schedule 2 of enhance safety and security and mitigate opportunities State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional for crime or antisocial behaviour. The following Development) 2011 (SEPP SRD), being development recommendations are suggested for implementation at the on land identified within ‘The Rocks Site’ with a Capital Sirius site: Investment Value (CIV) greater than $10 million. This CPTED Report has been prepared to support the – Lighting: Provide street lighting, pedestrian lighting and submission of an SSD Application for the restoration and feature lighting that supports natural surveillance and refurbishment of the Sirius site for determination by the allows residents of the building, visitors and the general Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE). public to safely observe the space around them, especially during the evening and night time. Sufficient This CPTED report provides a review of the proposed lighting should be provided to the building entrances, architectural and landscape design for the site with Cumberland Street forecourt, the through-site link and consideration of best security practices from a CPTED the length of the Sirius building’s frontage to Gloucester perspective. The report outlines the project, CPTED Walk. principles, and crime context for the project and makes – Wayfinding: Provide clear signage at key points that recommendations about appropriate CPTED strategies to clearly indicates designated pathways through the site mitigate opportunities for crime or antisocial behaviour. for visitors. Use design features (paving, landscaping, public art) to assist with wayfinding and help channel Methodology pedestrians through the site, while mitigating against pedestrians unintentionally moving into areas where This CPTED Report has been prepared in accordance they cannot be observed. with the methodology below, which is based on the – Landscaping: Improve and embellish public and private recommended methodology by the Crime Prevention spaces using landscaping and trees to encourage and the Assessment of Development Applications activation and community ownership of spaces. Ensure Guidelines (former NSW Department of Urban Affairs and landscaping is maintained and tree canopies are kept Planning) and the Safer by Design guidelines (NSW Police several metres above the ground to remove areas Department): where activity cannot be observed. – Site visit: this provided an understanding of the – Infrastructure protection: Provide fixtures, fittings and site’s context and characteristics, in particular, the surfaces that are vandal or graffiti resistant and easy to site’s interfaces with the adjacent public domain of clean. Ensure regular maintenance of infrastructure and Cumberland Street (west) and Gloucester Walk (east). prompt removal of graffiti and vandalism. – Demographic analysis: this provided an understanding of the potential underlying factors or contributors to

6 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus 1 Introduction Introduction

1.1 Purpose of this report 1.3 Site and context

Architectus has been engaged by Sirius Developments The Sirius site is located at 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Pty Ltd (the Developer) to prepare a Crime Prevention Rocks, Sydney, and is legally described as Lot 100 and Lot Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Report to assess 101 in DP 264104. the proposed restoration and refurbishment of the existing ‘Sirius building’, including modifications and additions to The site is an irregular shape with a total area of the building. approximately 3,664m². The site has a frontage of approximately 115m to Cumberland Street (west) and This CPTED Report assesses the architectural and approximately 120m to Gloucester Walk (east). The site has landscape design of the proposed development to identify a varied topography, generally stepping down from west to and reduce opportunities for crime or antisocial behaviour east. at the site and in the surrounding local area. It will consider issues such as surveillance, activation, accessibility, The existing Sirius building varies in height from north wayfinding and impacts on local amenity. Where negative to south with the central tower being a maximum height impacts are identified, recommendations will be provided of 62.0 RL, or approximately 33m above ground level to mitigate opportunities for crime or antisocial behaviour. (equivalent to a 10 storey building). The building is comprised of 79 residential apartments (mostly split level This report has been prepared in accordance with the dwellings), community rooms, rooftop garden terraces Crime Prevention and the Assessment of Development and 70 car parking spaces in a basement level. Vehicular Applications Guidelines published by the former NSW access is provided from Cumberland Street. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (originally published in 2001); the Safer by Design guidelines The Sirius site is immediately surrounded by: published on the NSW Police Department website; and, – Cumberland Street to the west, and adjacent to the based on Architectus’ experience on CPTED projects southern approaches of the Sydney Harbour Bridge; across the Sydney region. – George Street to the north with the National heritage 1.2 Background listed Sydney Harbour Bridge further to the north; – Gloucester Walk to the east with The Rocks, Circular The Sirius building is a residential apartment building in Quay and the National heritage listed Sydney Opera The Rocks, Sydney. The building was designed in 1978 – House beyond; and 1979 by Tao Gofers for the Housing Commission of NSW, and was used for social housing from 1980 to 2018. – A commercial office building adjacent to the site to the south (86 Cumberland Street, The Rocks). The existing building comprises 79 apartments and 70 car parking spaces. It is a prominent example of brutalist Refer to the Local context map at Figure 1, and images of architecture in Australia. the site at Figures 2 to 5.

In 2015, the NSW Government committed to selling 1.4 Local context the site. Following an extended bid process, Sirius Developments Pty Ltd was granted the rights to purchase The site is located in Central Sydney, with the Sydney the property under the terms of a Development Agreement. CBD extending to the south of the site (Martin Place is with Property NSW. The building is currently unoccupied located approximately 1km to the south). Circular Quay by residents. Wharf is approximately 350m to the south-east of the site, the Sydney Harbour Bridge is to the north of the site Prior to the sale of the site, the State Environmental (approximately 300m) and the Sydney Opera House is Planning Policy (State Significant Precincts) 2005 (SEPP to the east (approximately 600m) with the Royal Botanic SSP) was amended to identify the site under Schedule 3 Gardens beyond. Walsh Bay (approximately 220m) and (now amended to Appendix 18) and apply site-specific Barangaroo Headland Park (approximately 600m) are planning controls to the ‘Sirius site’. located to the west of the site.

The closest train station and light rail stop (CBD & South East Light Rail) to the site are approximately 700m walking distance at Circular Quay. Bus stops are located along Argyle Street, Hickson Road and at Circular Quay.

8 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Dawes Point Sydney Walsh Bay Harbour Bridge

Campbells Cove

Hickson Road

George Street

Sirius Site

Bradfield Highway Cumberland Street

Playfair Street Gloucester Walk

Overseas Passenger Terminal

Millers Point

The Rocks

Circular Quay Ferry Terminal

Western Distributor

Figure 1. Local context map Source: NearMaps, dated 1 June 2020 9 Cahill Expressway Introduction

Figure 2. Image of Gloucester Walk Figure 3. Image of Gloucester Walk and the Sirius building View looking north View looking south Source: Architectus, 15 November 2019 Source: Architectus, 15 November 2019

Figure 4. Image of Atherden Street and the Sirius building Figure 5. Image of Cumberland Street and the Sirius building View looking west View looking east Source: Architectus, 15 November 2019 Source: Architectus, 15 November 2019

10 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Introduction

1.5 Proposed development 1.6 Approval strategy

The proposed development is for the restoration and The proposed development is classified as State refurbishment of the existing Sirius building, including Significant Development (SSD) on the basis that it falls alterations and additions. within the requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 (SEPP SRD), The existing building is proposed to be substantially being development on land identified within ‘The Rocks retained and restored with integrity. New residential Site’ with a Capital Investment Value (CIV) greater than $10 additions are proposed to be added to the existing million. The Minister for Planning is the consent authority. structure in appropriate locations to maintain the legibility of the original architectural form, and new buildings This CPTED Report has been prepared to support the SSD for commercial uses are proposed to be added at the Application for the development of the site. Cumberland Street and Gloucester Walk frontages of the site. 1.6.1 SEARs requirements Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements The proposed works include: (SEARs) were issued by the Department of Planning, – Alterations and additions to the existing building to Industry and Environment (DPIE) on 20 November provide for: 2019 (Application No. SSD-10384). The SEARs require the preparation of a CPTED report and the application – Residential accommodation (an overall reduction in of CPTED principles within the public domain and dwelling numbers from the existing 79 apartments landscaping designs for the public domain surrounding the to a total of 76 apartments); site. This report addresses these SEARs requirements. – Commercial premises, including retail floorspace; and 1.7 Authorship – Basement car parking. This document has been prepared by Jane Anderson, – Provision of a through-site link connecting Cumberland Senior Urban Planner. Michael File, Consultant Planner to Street and Gloucester Walk. Architectus, has provided quality review. – Public domain improvements to Gloucester Walk, including landscaping and pedestrian access. The report has also been reviewed by Jane Fielding, Senior Associate at Architectus, who has undertaken the 3-day – Public domain improvements to Cumberland Street, Safer by Design training delivered by NSW Police. including landscaping and improved carpark entry. – Associated works, including: 1.8 Report structure – Minor demolition works; This CPTED Report is structured as follows: – Earthworks; – Section 1: Introduction; – Structural upgrades; – Section 2: Summary of the CPTED principles; – Services upgrades; and – Section 3: Crime profile of The Rocks area; – Landscaping works. – Section 4: CPTED assessment of the proposed development and strategies to guide development; and Refer to photomontage images of the proposed development at Figures 6 to 8. – Section 5: Conclusion and recommendations.

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 11 Introduction

Figure 6. Photomontage of the proposed restoration and refurbishment of Figure 7. Photomontage of the proposed restoration and refurbishment of AERIAL VIEW OF CUMBERLAND STREET LOOKING NORTH the Sirius site VIEW OF CUMBERLAND STREET FROM SYDNEY HARBOUR BRIDGE LOOKING SOUTH the Sirius site View to looking south from the Sydney Harbour Bridge walkway Aerial view looking north Source: BVN, October 2020 Source: BVN, October 2020

Figure 8. Photomontage of the proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius site View of the Cumberland Street forecourt looking south-east Source: BVN, October 2020

CUMBERLAND STREET LOOKING NORTH

12 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus 2 CPTED Principles CPTED Principles

2.1 Crime Prevention Through 2.1.2 Access control Environmental Design (CPTED) Access control is about decreasing opportunities for crime, by controlling access to a crime target and by creating a principles perception of risk to an offender.

The following CPTED principles from the NSW Crime The CPTED Guidelines provide the following in relation to Prevention and the Assessment of Development the principle ‘Access control’: Applications Guidelines (CPTED Guidelines) published by the former NSW Department of Urban Affairs and Planning “Physical and symbolic barriers can be used to attract, (2001) and the Safer by Design guidelines published by the channel or restrict the movement of people. They NSW Police Department, have been applied to develop minimise opportunities for crime and increase the effort site specific strategies and recommendations to reduce required to commit crime. opportunities for crime or antisocial behaviour at the Sirius site. By making it clear where people are permitted to go or not go, it becomes difficult for potential offenders to These include the following CPTED principles: reach and victimise people and their property. Illegible boundary markers and confusing spatial definition – Natural surveillance; make it easy for criminals to make excuses for being in – Access control; restricted areas. However, care needs to be taken to ensure that the barriers are not tall or hostile, creating – Territorial reinforcement; and the effect of a compound.” – Space management. Effective access control can be achieved by creating: 2.1.1 Natural surveillance – Landscapes and physical locations that channel and Natural surveillance is about creating environments that group pedestrian into target areas; keep intruders under observation. The design of physical – Public spaces which attract, rather than discourage features, can direct activities and people in such a way people from gathering; and so that maximum visibility and positive interaction occurs among legitimate users of space. Creating clear sight-lines – Restricted access to internal areas or high-risk areas is core to providing natural surveillance. (like car parks or other rarely visited areas), often achieved through the use of physical barriers. The CPTED Guidelines provide the following in relation to the principle ‘Surveillance’: 2.1.3 Territorial reinforcement “The attractiveness of crime targets can be reduced by Territorial reinforcement is about clearly defining private providing opportunities for effective surveillance, both space from semi-public and public space in order to create natural and technical” a sense of ownership. Design attention is required to ensure that territorial reinforcement is not achieved solely Quality surveillance can be achieved or improved by through physical barriers, such as gates and enclosures. considering the following design principles: The CPTED Guidelines provide the following in relation to – Clear sight-lines between public and private places; the principle ‘Territorial reinforcement’: – Streets and public spaces that can be observed from “Community ownership of public space sends positive nearby buildings; signals. People often feel comfortable in, and are more – Effective lighting of public places; likely to visit, places which feel owned and cared for. Well used places also reduce opportunities for crime – Spaces that facilitate entrapment are eliminated; and increase risk to criminals. – Attractive and well maintained landscaping that is If people feel that they have some ownership of public well lit, offers clear sight-lines and prevents offenders space, they are more likely to gather and to enjoy finding a place to hide or entrap victims; and that space. Community ownership also increases the – Activation of the space or surrounding areas that likelihood that people who witness crime will respond by encourages regular and diverse use of the space. quickly reporting it or by attempting to prevent it.”

14 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus CPTED Principles

Territorial reinforcement can be achieved through: Section 3.13.1 of the Sydney DCP 2012 provides the CPTED objective to: – Design with a clear distinction between public and private spaces by using physical barriers (e.g. fences Provide a safe environment and minimise opportunities and symbolic barriers (e.g. vegetation); for criminal and anti-social behaviour. – Design that encourages people to gather in a public Significant attempts have been made to improve the safety, space and to feel some responsibility for its use and security and amenity of the existing Sirius building for condition; residents, visitors and the public through the restoration – Environmental markers (e.g. signage, walkways, and refurbishment of the building. The proposed paving, lighting, bollards and fencing) which define architectural design prepared by BVN and landscape intended use and ownership; and design prepared by 360° Landscape Architects include provisions to minimise opportunities for criminal and – Regular maintenance of vegetation, infrastructure, and anti-social behaviour. It is considered that the proposed prompt removal of graffiti and vandalism. development is capable of complying with the Sydney DCP 2012 crime prevention objective. 2.1.4 Space management Space management involves the formal supervision, It is considered that the proposed development is also control and care of urban space and the development capable of complying with the CPTED provisions under itself. Public perceptions are shaped by the appearance of Section 3.13.1 of the Sydney DCP 2012, as provided below: a place. A well maintained urban environment is important 1. Active spaces and windows of habitable rooms in supporting user confidence and helping to control within buildings are to be located to maximise casual vandalism, crime and fear of crime. surveillance of streets, laneways, parking areas, public spaces and communal courtyard space. The CPTED Guidelines provide the following in relation to the principle ‘Space management’: 2. In commercial, retail or public buildings, facilities such as toilets and parents rooms are to be conveniently “Popular public space is often attractive, well located and designed to maximise casual surveillance maintained and well used space. Linked to the principle to facility entries. of territorial reinforcement, space management ensures that space is appropriately utilised and well cared for.” 3. Minimise blind-corners, recesses and other external areas that have the potential for concealment or Space management strategies include: entrapment.

– Site cleanliness; 4. Building entries are to be clearly visible, unobstructed and easily identifiable from the street, other public areas – Vandal resistant materials and fixtures; and other development. Where practicable lift lobbies, – Rapid repair of vandalism and graffiti; stairwells, hallways and corridors should be visible from the public domain. – Well maintained landscaping; 5. Ground floors of non-residential buildings, the – Well maintained pedestrian and car park lighting; and non-residential component of mixed use developments, – Well maintained public infrastructure (e.g. seats, signs, and the foyers of residential buildings, are to be bollards). designed to enable surveillance from the public domain to the inside of the building at night.

2.2 Sydney Development Control 6. Pedestrian routes from car parking spaces to lift lobbies Plan 2012 are to be as direct as possible with clear lines of sight along the route.

As described in Section 1.6 above, the Sirius site is located 7. Where dwelling units have individual main entries in ‘The Rocks Site’ under SEPP SRD. As such, no local directly from a public space, the entry is to include a controls apply to the Sirius site. clearly defined transitional space between public and private areas. However, the CPTED provisions under the Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 (Sydney DCP 2012) have 8. Building details such as fencing, drainpipes and been considered in this report for completeness. landscaping are to be designed so that illegitimate access is not facilitated by the opportunity for foot or hand-holds, concealment and the like.

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 15 3 Crime Profile Crime Profile

3.1 Overview 3.2.1 Demographic summary The summary below illustrates the key characteristics of The ‘Sirius site’ is located in the Sydney Local Government the precinct’s population. Area (LGA). It should be noted that the crime figures included in this report are based on information provided The summary encompasses the suburbs of The Rocks, by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research Millers Point and Dawes Point (sourced from census data (BOCSAR) and do not necessarily represent all crimes obtained via Profile.id in July 2020). committed in the Sydney LGA. – 2016 census data provides that the residential This section of the report provides a snapshot of the population of The Rocks, Millers Point and Dawes Point crime profile in the Sydney LGA and The Rocks suburb was 2,642, living in 2,183 dwellings with an average and has been included in this report to provide contextual household size of 1.79. understanding for the CPTED analysis and treatment measures identified. The CPTED Guidelines recommends – The population estimate for the area as of 30 June this analysis be undertaken. 2019 is 3,298. Since the previous year, the population has grown by 5.22% (compared to 1.67% in Greater Sydney). 3.2 The Rocks community profile – The population estimate above (2019) equates to a Identifying the profile of the local community is important population density of 40.36 persons per hectare. This in building an understanding of potential issues, tensions is low density when compared to the City of Sydney’s and incidence of crime. This section provides an overview average population density of 92.18 persons per of The Rocks community profile, which will form a lens hectare. through which the CPTED principles are assessed. – In 2016, 99.1% of the dwellings in the area were medium or high density (compared to 44% in Greater The Rocks is situated on a headland at the narrowest point Sydney). of Sydney Harbour. The sandstone topography, which gives the precinct its name, and the surrounding Sydney – In 2016, the area had a lower proportion of children Harbour provides The Rocks with a strong sense of place. (under 18) and a higher proportion of persons aged The Greater Sydney Commission’s Eastern City District 60 or older than City of Sydney. There were 23 people Plan (dated March 2018) identifies the unique natural over the age of 85 living in The Rocks, Millers Point and setting of the area as “one of the District’s key assets” that Dawes Point in 2016, with largest age group being 30 “contributes to the diversity of the District’s scenic value”. to 34 year olds. – The three largest ancestries in the area in 2016 were The Rocks is an established area with more than two English, Australian and Irish, with 36.5% of people born centuries of significant cultural activity, including early overseas (compared with 36.7% in Greater Sydney). contact between Aboriginal people and European people, colonial settlement, maritime activity and struggles for – 1,383 people living in The Rocks, Millers Point and heritage conservation over the last decades. These layers Dawes Point in 2016 were employed, of which 76% of history have resulted in a unique urban form and street worked full-time and 24% part-time. More people were network of laneways and pedestrian walkways. employed full-time (74.2%) than the Greater Sydney average (61.2%), and jobs were predominantly in The Sirius site (and building) is not identified as a Local professional services. or State heritage item, nor is it included on the National Heritage List or Commonwealth Heritage List, and as such no heritage constraints apply to the site. However the site is within The Rocks Conservation Area and surrounded by various State heritage items. The site is situated nearby the Nationally listed Sydney Opera House and Sydney Harbour Bridge. Given the above, significant increases in density or changes to the area’s built form is considered unlikely in the near future.

It is noted that The Rocks has a diverse range of land uses, including residential, retail, commercial, hotel/tourism, public/civic and recreational uses, which provides for a large number of transient workers and visitors to the area.

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 17 Crime Profile

3.3 Local crime profile It is noted that the subject site is included in data for the Sydney LGA, which also takes in the Sydney CBD. It is The extent of crime activity at the subject site was anticipated that crime levels at the subject site would be determined by an analysis of data from NSW Bureau of less than that of the Sydney CBD and other parts of the Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR). The CPTED Sydney LGA given the lower population density in The Guidelines recommends this analysis be undertaken. Rocks.

In Table 1, crime occurrence in the suburb of The Rocks is Crime hotspot maps for specific offence types are compared against Sydney LGA and NSW averages (rate provided at Appendix A of this report. Figure 9 below per 100,000 people) for the year prior to March 2020 to provides an example hotspot map (incidents of help quantify the local crime profile. ‘non-domestic assault’ from April 2019 to March 2020).

Figure 9. Incidents of assault (non-domestic) from April 2019 to March 2020 Site outlined in red. This crime hot spot map indicates incidents of one identified crime category (non-domestic assault) and is indicative of the general concentration of all crime incidences in the Sydney LGA and immediately surrounding areas. Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR)

18 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Crime Profile

Table 1. Crime incidence profile for The Rocks, Sydney LGA The Rocks Sydney LGA NSW (Rate per Sydney LGA 5 The Rocks Incidence (Rate per Crime offence 100,000 People) Year Trend (Number of Ranking (Very 100,000 People) Year to March (Change per Incidences) Year Low, Low, Year to March 2020 Year) to March 2020 Medium, High, 2020 Very High) Assault 823.8 1,893.6 Down 2.3% 102 High

Domestic assault 393.8 456.2 Stable 11 High

Non-domestic 398.7 1,297.1 Down 3.3% 87 High assault

Assault Police 31.2 140.3 Stable 4 Medium

Homicide 1.4 3.3 Not counted (nc) 0 Very Low

Murder 0.9 2.1 nc 0 Very Low

Attempted murder 0.4 0.8 nc 0 Very Low

Murder accessory, 0.0 0.0 nc 0 Very Low conspiracy

Manslaughter 7.0 0.4 nc 0 Very Low

Robbery 31.0 94.5 Down 9.8% 3 Very High

Robbery without a 17.3 68.3 Down 8.2% 3 Very High weapon

Robbery with a 1.8 1.7 nc 0 Very Low firearm

Robbery with a 11.8 24.6 Down 12.9% 0 Very Low weapon not a firearm

Sexual offences 181.5 306.8 Up 4.5% 14 Medium

Sexual assault 80.2 117.0 Up 4.7% 5 Very Low

Indecent assault, 101.3 189.8 Up 4.4% 9 Medium act of indecency & other sexual offences

Theft 2,800.9 6,685.3 Down 7.3% 158 Medium

Break & enter 316.2 304.3 Down 5.1% 2 Very Low dwelling

Break & enter 124.2 201.9 Stable 1 Very Low non-dwelling

Receiving / 112.7 602.8 Stable 6 High handling stolen goods

Motor vehicle theft 167.4 117.0 Down 6.6% 1 Very Low

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 19 Crime Profile

Steal from motor 471.4 483.7 Down 10.9% 3 Very Low vehicle

Steal from retail 331.6 1,198.0 Stable 20 Very Low store

Steal from a 235.9 444.2 Down 4.6% 4 Medium dwelling

Steal from a person 44.7 336.8 Down 17.4% 27 Very High

Stock theft 4.8 0.4 nc 0 Very Low

Fraud 655.6 1,585.6 Down 13.4% 34 Low

Other theft 336.5 1,410.7 Down 6.1% 60 High

Malicious damage 701.8 987.4 Down 6.1% 25 Low to property

Against justice 948.8 2,135.0 Stable 47 Very Low procedures

Escape custody 2.4 7.9 nc 0 Very Low

Breach AVO 231.0 225.2 Up 4.7% 2 Very Low

Breach bail 610.8 1,502.3 Stable 23 Very Low conditions

Fail to appear 8.4 32.1 Down 9.9% 0 Very Low

Resist/ hinder 74.9 326.4 Down 5.2% 20 High officer

Other offences 21.3 41.2 Up 6.2% 2 Medium against procedures

Disorderly 251.9 953.3 Stable 43 Medium conduct

Trespass 137.2 316.4 Up 5.8% 6 Very Low

Offensive conduct 54.1 412.9 Down 6.9% 28 High

Offensive language 28.6 89.5 Down 11.3% 9 High

Criminal intent 32.0 134.5 Up 8.7% 0 Very Low

Drug offences 647.6 3,101.6 Stable 45 Very Low

Use/possess 31.2 315.9 Up 12.4% 14 Low cocaine

Use/ possess 16.2 93.2 Down 4.7% 0 Very Low narcotics

Use/possess 219.2 696.8 Down 7.7% 6 Very Low cannabis

Use/possess 103.1 363.8 Down 2.7% 1-4 Low amphetamines

20 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Crime Profile

Use/possess 30.7 346.8 Stable 3 Very Low ecstasy

Use/possess other 72.9 393.8 Up 10.5% 3 Very Low drugs

Deal/traffic cocaine 14.2 117.4 Up 12.7% 6 Medium

Deal/traffic 8.0 43.3 Down 12.1% 0 Very Low narcotics

Deal/traffic 12.5 35.4 Up 12.9% 0 Very Low cannabis

Deal/traffic 25.7 89.9 Stable 4 Very High amphetamines

Deal/traffic ecstasy 7.3 59.9 Stable 1 Very Low

Deal/traffic other 7.1 69.5 Up 17.0% 0 Very Low drugs

Cultivating 13.6 1.2 nc 0 Very Low cannabis

Manufacture drugs 0.8 1.2 nc 0 Very low

Importing drugs 2.7 9.6 nc 0 Very Low

Other drug 82.3 463.7 Up 6.0% 4 Very Low offences

More offences 647.6 3,101.6 Stable 43 Medium

Abduction & 2.5 2.5 nc 0 Very Low kidnapping

Arson 61.6 24.6 Stable 0 Very Low

Betting and gaming 1.1 7.9 nc 0 Very Low offences

Blackmail and 1.0 2.9 nc 0 Very Low extortion

Intimidation, 451.4 594.0 Up 7.0% 16 Low stalking & harassment

Liquor offences 139.2 1,171.8 Stable 129 Very High

Other offences 15.0 33.3 nc 3 High against the person

Pornography 8.4 8.7 nc 0 Very Low offences

Prohibited and 205.6 435.8 Up 6.5% 8 Medium regulated weapons offences

Prostitution 0.3 3.7 nc 0 Very Low offences

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 21 Crime Profile

3.4 Analysis of crime profile The proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius building should incorporate design elements that Given the above analysis, the following observations are contribute to the reduction in criminal and anti-social made in relation to criminal and anti-social behaviour in the behaviour in The Rocks area where possible, and provide Sydney LGA and The Rocks area: best practice built environment outcomes to mitigate opportunities for criminal offences to occur. Refer to the – Sydney LGA has a higher incidence of crimes for recommendations provided at Sections 4 and 5 of this almost all crimes assessed compared to the NSW rate report. per 100,000 people. The only crimes where rates are lower in the Sydney LGA than NSW rates per 100,000 It is understood that the SSD Application for the restoration people are crimes of manslaughter; break and enter and refurbishment of the Sirius site will likely be referred dwelling; motor vehicle theft; stock theft; breach AVO; by DPIE to the NSW Police for comment. Input on effective cultivating cannabis; and arson. design strategies to minimise opportunities for criminal behaviour from the NSW Police would be welcomed by the – In general, Sydney LGA performs poorly for the majority project team. of crime incident indicators, however in almost all categories (except for sexual offences and some drug offences) crime levels have remained stable or have declined in frequency over the last 5-year period.

– The Rocks area has a lower population density than the Sydney LGA, however when compared to the suburbs of Sydney or Haymarket within the Sydney LGA, The Rocks generally has an equal or higher crime incidence ranking (very low, low, medium, high, very high). This is especially the case for crimes involving: – Assault – ‘high’ in The Rocks compared to ‘medium’ in Sydney / Haymarket; – Robbery – ‘very high’ in The Rocks compared to ‘high’ in Sydney / Haymarket; – Sexual offences – ‘medium’ in The Rocks compared to ‘low’ in Sydney and ‘very low’ in Haymarket. – Disorderly conduct – ‘medium’ in The Rocks compared to ‘low’ in Sydney and ‘very low’ in Haymarket.

– In each of the key crime categories, the suburbs of Millers Point and Dawes Point are identified as having a ‘very low’ crime incidence ranking.

– The five-year trend figures show the change in crime numbers per year as a percentage where there is a change. Five of the most prevalent crimes applicable to the Sirius site are liquor offences; non-domestic assault; other theft; fraud and offensive conduct. Each of these crimes have either remained stable over this period or have reduced in occurrence. Based on these trends, the likelihood of these offences occurring in the future should either remain stable or reduce.

22 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus 4 Design Assessment Design Assessment

4.1 Overview 4.2 Architectural drawings and reference documents This section assesses the proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius site against the CPTED This CPTED assessment considers the current principles of natural surveillance, access control, territorial architectural and landscape design documentation for the reinforcement and natural space management. proposed restoration and refurbishment of the Sirius site. While this CPTED assessment considers the Sirius site as The plans considered in this assessment are identified in a whole, the following key publicly accessible spaces are Appendix B. reviewed in detail to assess how the CPTED principles are implemented: Additionally, CPTED principles addressed in the Architectural Design Report, prepared by BVN Architects, 1. The Cumberland Street frontage and Cumberland and the Landscape Design Report, prepared by 360° Street forecourt; Landscape Architects, are considered in this assessment. 2. The through-site link;

3. The northern pocket-park; and

4. Gloucester Walk.

24 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Design Assessment

4.3 Cumberland Street frontage The presence of neighbouring sites will help improve natural surveillance of the forecourt space by increasing and Cumberland Street forecourt the number of people who can observe potential criminal or anti-social behaviour and ultimately report offending The proposed upgrades to the Cumberland Street public behaviour. Neighbouring sites include the popular tourist domain and generous public forecourt will activate destination of ‘BridgeClimb Sydney’ on the opposite side the western edge of the site and improve pedestrian of Cumberland Street and the commercial office building circulation. at 86-88 Cumberland Street to the south of the site. Additionally, people walking along the Sydney Harbour It is noted that further consultation with Place Management Bridge walkway will be able to view the forecourt space will be undertaken regarding the proposed public domain from above. upgrades and off-site works. The use of glazing to the Sirius building’s western façade 4.3.1 Natural surveillance will facilitate natural surveillance of the space by residents The open-plan design of the Sirius building’s public of the building. Vehicles passing by along Cumberland forecourt will encourage this space to be used as a Street will also act as another layer of natural surveillance. gathering space for residents and visitors. The new Cumberland Street commercial building with ground level The landscape design provides for additional tree planting cafe and the new through-site link connecting Cumberland that is set back from the residential entry and new through- Street with Gloucester Walk, which opens to the forecourt, site link, allowing for clear wayfinding and visibility of the will help to activate the space. plaza area for users. Tree and planting selection will allow for natural surveillance to be maintained by ensuring sight Natural surveillance will be achieved by residents of the lines are not obscured. Ongoing landscape maintenance Sirius building (where windows of habitable rooms on the will be required to ensure that tree canopies are kept western facade will maximise casual surveillance), visitors several metres above the ground to remove opportunities to the Cumberland Street commercial building and cafe, for hiding places or areas where activity cannot be and by members of the public utilising the through-site link. observed.

Figure 10. Natural surveillance of Cumberland Street frontage and Cumberland Street forecourt Source: 360° Landscape Architects Public Domain - Site Plan, with Architectus overlay of sight-lines

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 25

IMPORTANT NOTES: CLIENT ARCHITECT CHECKED ISS. AMENDMENT DATE BY Do not scale from drawings DWG. TITLE All discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect A DRAFT SSDA 31.07.20 LB Larger scale drawings and written dimensions take preference. All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated. Sirius LB 0 2m 4m 6m 10m All tree dimensions and RLs in metres. B DRAFT SSDA 04.08.20 LB Use figured dimensions only. Developments Landscape Plan - LEVEL 03-05 Verify all dimensions on site before the commencement of any works. Pty Ltd C DRAFT SSDA 07.08.20 LB Contractors shall locate and protect all services prior to construction. N All work shall be carried out in accordance with ASA, BCA and Local Government Regulations. Structural Details shall be subject to Engineer’s Specifications. PROJECT DRAFT D DRAFT SSDA 24.09.20 LB Drainage & Water Feature Details shall be subject to Hydraulic Engineer’s Specifications. 1:200 @ A1 _ 1:400 @ A3 All work shall be carried out in a professional manner by Qualified Tradesman according to Landscape Drawings and E DRAFT SSDA 16.10.20 LB Engineer’s Specifications.

The forecourt space has been identified as an opportunity 4.3.4 Space management for a major public art installation that is integrated with The Cumberland Street forecourt should be provided with the landscape. This will provide an urban beckoning to vandal resistant materials, fittings and fixtures, including passers-by to utilise the space. lighting, CCTV cameras, signage and rubbish bins to reduce the potential for vandalism. Given that the proposal is for the restoration and refurbishment of the existing Sirius building, and will The forecourt space will be maintained by the Sirius significantly retain the building’s existing structures, it building body corporate. Cleanliness of the site should be is understood that the building may have elements that maintained at all times to demonstrate guardianship of the create hidden corners where natural surveillance is not space. Vandalised elements should be quickly repaired optimal. The proposed architectural and landscape design and graffiti should be removed promptly to show that the aims to improve these areas by improving sight-lines and space is cared for by the community, thereby reducing opportunities for natural surveillance through activation of opportunities for additional criminal or anti-social acts. the public domain. Additionally, new street lighting will be Landscaping materials and fixtures selected should be provided along Cumberland Street to aid surveillance and easy to clean to allow for maintenance. CCTV cameras will be provided within the forecourt and at the residential entrance to the building.

4.3.2 Access control The utilisation of brick walls, paving and landscaping around the forecourt area will assist with wayfinding and help channel pedestrians to the through-site link, while mitigating against pedestrians unintentionally moving into areas where they cannot be observed. Outdoor seating will be provided to patrons of the cafe during operating hours. The space will attract, rather than discourage people from gathering.

Physical barriers will be provided to the basement car park entry from Cumberland Street, to the residential lobby and common room to the Sirius building and to the residential lift at Core 5 to ensure access is restricted to residents. Access to the gym and pool in the upper level of the Cumberland Street building will be restricted for residents only.

4.3.3 Territorial reinforcement While the Cumberland Street forecourt will be accessible to the pubic, and public use of the through-site link will be encouraged, there will be a perceivable delineation between the public footpath along Cumberland Street and the Sirius site. New Blue Stone paving will be provided to the Cumberland Street footpath, as per the City of Sydney Streets Design Code. The Blue Stone paving will extend into the forecourt space and bleed into a smaller format paver (brick size) at the through-site link.

26 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Design Assessment

4.4 Through-site link The through-site link has been identified as an excellent location for a major public art installation. This will provide The proposed new public through-site link will connect an urban beckoning to passers-by to utilise the space. Cumberland Street and Gloucester Walk, thereby extending the existing network of pedestrian pathways Effective lighting will be provided to the through-site link at and lanes through The Rocks precinct and improving all times of day and night to ensure that sight-lines are not public activation and occupation of the public domain. The obscured and to remove opportunities for hiding places through-site link will be undercover for it’s entire length or areas where activity cannot be observed. Additionally, (13 metres), and will ensure weather protection, continued CCTV cameras will be provided within the through-site link utilisation and public benefit. and at the residential entrance to the building.

Refer to the Section diagram of the through-site link at 4.4.2 Access control Figure 12. The through-site link will be open to the general public at all times and people will be encouraged to utilise the 4.4.1 Natural surveillance through-site link. The through-site link will provide clear sight-lines between public and private spaces. It will link two public spaces, The use of paving and landscaping around the being Cumberland Street and Gloucester Walk, and will Cumberland Street forecourt area and at the Gloucester be surrounded by active uses, including retail tenancies Walk side will assist with wayfinding and help channel to the east and west and residential lobbies. Glazing to pedestrians to the through-site link. the Philip Room residential common room and library will adjoin the through-site link. Natural surveillance is achieved Physical barriers will be provided at the entrances to the by residents of the Sirius building from the lobby entance residential lobbies to the Sirius building. and Philip Room, visitors to the Cumberland Street and Gloucester Walk cafés, and by members of the public utilising the through-site link.

Figure 11. Natural surveillance of the through-site link Source: 360° Landscape Architects Public Domain - Site Plan, with Architectus overlay of sight-lines

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 27

No responsibility will be taken by 360 degrees. For any variations in design, construction method, materials specified, and SCALE DRAWN ISSUE L-DA-06 general specifications without permission from the Project Engineer or Landscape Architect. SIRIUS, 36-50 CUMBERLAND ST, THE ROCKS This Drawing is copyright to 360 degrees. As Shown LB SSDA 0.0 6.5 10.5 14.5 17.0 21.0 25.0 29.0 33.0 35.5 39.5 43.5 47.5 51.5 54.0 58.0 62.0 66.0 70.0 74.0 78.0 82.0 86.0 90.0 94.0 98.0 102.0 104.5 108.5 112.5 116.5 120.5 123.0 124.5 RL 67.4 PR ROOF 67.370m 1550 LEVEL 28 65.820m

SERVICE PLANT 5670 PRIVATE TERRACE 3100 LEVEL 27 62.720m EX ROOF NSW ARCHITECTS REGISTRATION BOARD / NON-TRAFFICABLE PLANTED ROOF NOMINATED ARCHITECTS

3100 61.700m 6501 ABBIE GALVIN 9356 NINOTSCHKA TITCHKOSKY PR LEVEL 26 7115 JULIAN ASHTON EX PLANT 7053 MATTHEW BLAIR 59.620m 7151 PHILLIP ROSSINGTON PV 59.240m 4937 JAMES GROSE

LIFT A LIFT B 3880 EX LEVEL 26 Telephone +61 2 8297 7200 RAISED SPA / POOL 57.040m Facsimile +61 2 8297 7299 LEVEL 25 www.bvn.com.au 55.740m LEVEL 24 2610 LEVEL 23 54.535m 53.130m LEVEL 22 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 2610 51.840m COPYRIGHT BVN ARCHITECTURE PTY LIMITED. UNLESS OTHERWISE LEVEL 21 AGREED IN WRITING;ALL RIGHTS TO THIS DOCUMENT ARE SUBJECT TO PAYMENT IN FULL OF ALL BVN CHARGES;THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY 50.520m BE USED FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE AND PROJECT FOR WHICH IT LEVEL 20 HAS BEEN CREATED AND DELIVERED, AS NOTIFIED IN WRITING BY

2590 BVN;AND THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE OTHERWISE USED, OR COPIED. LEVEL 19 49.220m ANY UNAUTHORISED USE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS AT THE USER'S SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIMITING BVN'S RIGHTS THE USER RELEASES AND 47.930m LEVEL 18 INDEMNIFIES BVN FROM AND AGAINST ALL LOSS SO ARISING. 2610 46.620m NOTE LEVEL 17 CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR 45.320m TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK OR PREPARATION OF SHOP DRAWINGS. LEVEL 16 DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING 2610 SITE BOUNDARY SITE BOUNDARY 44.035m LEVEL 15 ISSUE DATE FOR 42.710m LEVEL 14 1 26.06.20 FOR INFORMATION

2610 2 30.06.20 FOR INFORMATION LEVEL 13 41.425m 3 23.07.20 FOR INFORMATION 40.100m 4 14.08.20 FOR INFORMATION LEVEL 12 5 04.09.20 NOT FOR SSDA - DRAFT 2590 LEVEL 11 38.820m 6 17.09.20 NOT FOR SSDA - DRAFT Design Assessment 7 18.09.20 FOR SSDA 37.510m LEVEL 10 2600 LEVEL 09 36.205m 34.910m LEVEL 08 2590 LEVEL 07 33.610m 32.320m LEVEL 06 2590 LEVEL 05 31.010m 29.730m LEVEL 04 2600 LEVEL 03 28.435m CAFE 27.130m LEVEL 02 4.4.3 Territorial reinforcement 2595 BASEMENT PARKING B1a LEVEL 01 25.810m 24.535m BASEMENT PARKING B1a Environmental markers will be provided to the through-site 149512701290 B1a link to clearly define the area as a public space. New B1b 23.040m Blue Stone paving will extendLOWER BASEMENT from the public domain and 21.770m B2a SERVICE PARKING B2b 20.480m Cumberland Street forecourtRL 18.72 into the through-site link, 1480 B2b 19.000m however a change in paving size and pattern DASHED:will be EXTENT used OF LOWER BASEMENT PARKING B2b to delineate the space and define it’s intended use as a public walkway to move between spaces. 1 GA_LONG SECTION 00-00-00-00-00 RL 67.4 Signage, lighting, and public art elements will also be used PR ROOF to demonstrate the space is cared for and encourage 67.370m 1550 people to feel some responsibility for its use and condition. LEVEL 28 LEVEL 08 5670 SERVICE PLANT 3100 65.820m 33.610m LEVEL 27 4.4.4 Space management LEVEL 06 PROJECT MANAGER EX 62.720mROOF The new public through-site link should be provided with 31.010m DEDICO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

3300 61.700m 3480 SITE BOUNDARY SITE BOUNDARY SITE BOUNDARY 2080 vandal resistant materials, fittings and fixtures, including LEVEL 04 PREX LEVEL PLANT 26 CLIENT SITE BOUNDARY 28.435m 59.240m59.620m any proposed public art and lighting, to reduce the 2580 PRIVATE PRIVATE CUMBERLAND STREET

3500 potential for vandalism. SOHO 3500 EX LEVEL 26 COURTYARD COURTYARD LEVEL 02

1300 LEVEL57.040m 25 25.810m GLOUCESTER WALK 55.740m The through-site link will be maintained by the SiriusBASEMENT PARKING B1a SIRIUS DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD

2610 RL (EXT) 22.4 LEVEL 23 building body corporate. Cleanliness of the site should be CLIENT NUMBER 53.130m maintained at all times to demonstrate guardianship of the 2610 LEVEL 21 space. Vandalised elements should be quickly repaired PROJECT 50.520m and graffiti should be removed promptly to show that the 2590 LEVEL 19 space is cared for by the community, thereby reducing 47.930m opportunities for additional criminal or anti-social acts. SIRIUS SITE 2610 4 LEVEL 17 Materials andGA_CROSS fixtures SECTION_SOHO selected should be easy to clean to 2-60 CUMBERLAND ST, THE ROCKS AR-G50_XX-02 45.320m allow for maintenance. BVN PROJECT NUMBER 2610 LEVEL 15 1712011 42.710m DRAWING KEY 2610 Draft Issue -LEVEL Not 13 for SSDA Issue 40.100m 2590 LEVEL 11 LEVEL 11 37.510m 37.510m 2600 LEVEL 09 LEVEL 09 CUMBERLAND BUILDING BEYOND 34.910m 34.910m

2590 CUMBERLAND BUILDING BEYOND SITE BOUNDARY SITE BOUNDARY LEVEL 07 LEVEL 07 TRUE NORTH PROJECT NORTH 32.320m 32.320m 2590 LEVEL 05 LEVEL 05 GRAPHIC SCALE 29.730m 29.730m THROUGH SITE LINK 2600 PUBLIC FORECOURT CUMBERLAND STREET PHILLIP ROOM CUMBERLAND STREET LEVEL 03 LEVEL 03 0 2000 5000 SCALE 27.130m 27.130m GLOUCESTER WALK GLOUCESTER WALK BASEMENT PARKING B1a BASEMENT PARKING B1a BASEMENT PARKING B1a 1 : 200@A1 STATUS B1a B1a 23.040m 23.040m FOR INFORMATION LOWER DRAWING BASEMENT LOADING LOADING DOCK B2b PARKING B2b RL 18.72 RL 17.97 19.000m RL 17.97 B2b 19.000m SECTIONS 2 GA_CROSS SECTION 3 GA_CROSS SECTION_THROUGH SITE LINK ISSUE R-99-04 R-99-04 PART SECTION AR-D-10-01 7 C:\REVIT_LOCAL2019\AR_1712011_SIR_SIRIUS_2019_Selina_Qiu.rvt 18/09/2020 9:55:43 AM

Figure 12. Section drawing of the through-site link Source: BVN Architects, GA Sections, Plan AR-D-10-01

28 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Design Assessment

4.5 Northern pocket park 4.5.1 Natural surveillance Natural surveillance of the pocket park will be achieved The area adjacent to the Sirius site to the north is an by visitors to the cafe during operating hours, by residents existing pocket park that consists of steps, a terrace of the Sirius building that overlook the park, and by area, low brick walls and trees. The park is currently low pedestrians passing along Cumberland Street. Vehicles amenity and not an inviting space. As part of the proposed traveling along Cumberland Street will also provide natural development for the Sirius site, off-site works to the public surveillance. The presence of neighbouring sites, including domain are proposed, including rejuvenation of the park to the ‘BridgeClimb Sydney’ office, will help improve natural provide new paving of the terrace, ramp access and new surveillance. People walking along the Sydney Harbour landscaping works. Bridge walkway will be able to view the park from above. It is noted that further consultation with Place Management The proposed new tree plantings appear to provide will be undertaken regarding the proposed public domain adequate spacing that would encourage the ability to see upgrades and off-site works. from the street into the pocket park without obstruction. If maintained, the canopy of the new trees should not restrict It is anticipated that the commercial tenancy at the northern the ability for users of the pocket park to maintain sight- end of the Sirius site is likely to operate as a cafe and that a lines to the street. Landscaping within planter boxes are permit for outdoor seating would be obtained to utilise the low and are not anticipated to impede on sight-lines. terrace space of the pocket-park during operating hours.

Figure 13. Natural surveillance of the northern pocket-park Source: 360° Landscape Architects Public Domain - Site Plan, with Architectus overlay of sight-lines

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 29

IMPORTANT NOTES: CLIENT ARCHITECT CHECKED ISS. AMENDMENT DATE BY Do not scale from drawings DWG. TITLE All discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect A DRAFT SSDA 31.07.20 LB Larger scale drawings and written dimensions take preference. All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated. Sirius LB 0 2m 4m 6m 10m All tree dimensions and RLs in metres. B DRAFT SSDA 04.08.20 LB Use figured dimensions only. Developments Landscape Plan - LEVEL 01-03 Verify all dimensions on site before the commencement of any works. Pty Ltd C DRAFT SSDA 07.08.20 LB Contractors shall locate and protect all services prior to construction. N All work shall be carried out in accordance with ASA, BCA and Local Government Regulations. Structural Details shall be subject to Engineer’s Specifications. PROJECT DRAFT D DRAFT SSDA 24.09.20 LB Drainage & Water Feature Details shall be subject to Hydraulic Engineer’s Specifications. 1:200 @ A1 _ 1:400 @ A3 All work shall be carried out in a professional manner by Qualified Tradesman according to Landscape Drawings and E DRAFT SSDA 16.10.20 LB Engineer’s Specifications.

No responsibility will be taken by 360 degrees. For any variations in design, construction method, materials specified, and SCALE DRAWN ISSUE L-DA-05 general specifications without permission from the Project Engineer or Landscape Architect. SIRIUS, 36-50 CUMBERLAND ST, THE ROCKS This Drawing is copyright to 360 degrees. 1:200 @ A1 LB SSDA NSW ARCHITECTS REGISTRATION BOARD / NOMINATED ARCHITECTS 6501 ABBIE GALVIN 9356 NINOTSCHKA TITCHKOSKY 7115 JULIAN ASHTON 7053 MATTHEW BLAIR 7151 PHILLIP ROSSINGTON Design Assessment 4937 JAMES GROSE Telephone +61 2 8297 7200 Facsimile +61 2 8297 7299 www.bvn.com.au

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COPYRIGHT BVN ARCHITECTURE PTY LIMITED. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED IN WRITING;ALL RIGHTS TO THIS DOCUMENT ARE SUBJECT TO PAYMENT IN FULL OF ALL BVN CHARGES;THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE AND PROJECT FOR WHICH IT HAS BEEN CREATED AND DELIVERED, AS NOTIFIED IN WRITING BY BVN;AND THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE OTHERWISE USED, OR COPIED. 4.5.2 Access control 4.5.4 Space management ANY UNAUTHORISED USE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS AT THE USER'S SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIMITING BVN'S RIGHTS THE USER RELEASES AND INDEMNIFIES BVN FROM AND AGAINST ALL LOSS SO ARISING. The pocket park is situated to the north of the Sirius site. The pocket park should be provided with vandal resistant NOTE materials, fittings and fixtures, including public domain CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK OR PREPARATION OF SHOP DRAWINGS. It is noted that there is a significant level change furniture, CCTV cameras, signage and rubbish bins to DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING between the pocket-park and the pedestrian pathway of reduce the potential for vandalism. Gloucester Walk below. As such, access to the park is ISSUE DATE FOR PR ROOF RL 67.4 RL 67.4 PR ROOF 1 23.07.20 FOR INFORMATION limited67.370m to Cumberland Street, which is not a particularly Lighting of the pocket park will be particularly important CONC-01 CONC-01 67.370m 2 04.09.20 NOT FOR SSDA - DRAFT 3 07.09.20 NOT FOR SSDA - DRAFT busy pedestrian route. Refer to Figure 14 below that to ensure users can view the area surrounding them and LVR-01 ? 4 15.09.20 NOT FOR SSDA - DRAFT LEVEL 28 1550 LVR-01 1550 LEVEL 28 demonstrates the significant level change to Gloucester avoid creating a potential dark spot. MTL-01 5 17.09.20 NOT FOR SSDA - DRAFT RL 64.1 MTL-01 Walk.65.820m 65.820m 6 18.09.20 FOR SSDA MTL-01 3100 Any plantings should be trimmed regularly to ensure 3100 LEVEL 27 LEVEL 27 The park is likely to be used by visitors to the cafe during places to hide are limited, as spaces that have dark or 62.720m EX ROOF EX ROOF 62.720m operating hours, and by residents of the Sirius building and obscured spots encourage anti-social or criminal activity. 61.700m 61.700m localsPR outside LEVEL 26of cafe operating2460 hours. The cafe will rely on 2460 PR LEVEL 26 EX PLANT MTL-01 EX PLANT successful59.620m wayfinding signage to channel visitors to it. Cleanliness of the park should be maintained at all times 59.620m 59.240m RL 57.3 to demonstrate guardianship of the space and discourage GL-02 59.240m CONC-02

EX LEVEL 263500 3500 EX LEVEL 26 4.5.3 Territorial reinforcement loitering or anti-social behaviour. Vandalised elements GL-02 LEVEL 25 57.040m should be quickly repaired and graffiti should be removed 1 57.040m LEVEL 25 The pocket park will be designed to attract, rather than 55.740m LEVEL 24 promptly to increase perception of safety. C-11-02CONC-02 LEVEL 24 55.740m discourage people 54.535mfrom gathering.2610 This area is located GL-02 2610 54.535m adjacentLEVEL to 23a broad area of paving on CumberlandGL-02 Street RL 52.4 RL 52.4 LEVEL 23 2695 2695 which53.130m is clearly designatedLEVEL 22 public space, whichCONC reduces-01 LEVEL 22 53.130m

2610 CONC-02 2610 the ambiguityLEVEL 21 that the51.840m pocket park is also intended for 51.840m LEVEL 21 ? 2620 public50.520m use. The open-plan design of the pocket park, as MTL-01 2620 50.520m LEVEL 20 MTL-02 LEVEL 20 well as the new landscape elements2590 will encourage people 2590 LEVEL 19 49.220m 49.220m LEVEL 19 2600 to utilise the space for rest and relaxation. 2600 47.930m LEVEL 18 RL 46.0 LEVEL 18 47.930m 46.620m 2610 2610 46.620m LEVEL 17 RL 44.1 LEVEL 17 2585 RL 43.5 2585 45.320m LEVEL 16 RL 43.5 LEVEL 16 45.320m 2610 2610 LEVEL 15 44.035m 44.035m LEVEL 15 2610 2610 42.710m LEVEL 14 LEVEL 14 42.710m 2610 RL 39.7 2610 LEVEL 13 41.425m 41.425m LEVEL 13 2605 40.100m 2605 40.100m LEVEL 12 RL 37.5 LEVEL 12 2590 2590 LEVEL 11 38.820m 38.820m LEVEL 11 2615 2615 37.510m LEVEL 10 LEVEL 10 37.510m 2600 MTL-01 2600 LEVEL 09 36.205m 36.205m LEVEL 09 2595 2595 34.910m LEVEL 08 LEVEL 08 34.910m PROJECT MANAGER 2590 2590 LEVEL 07 33.610m 33.610m LEVEL 07 DEDICO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2600 2600 32.320m LEVEL 06 LEVEL 06 32.320m CLIENT 2590 2590 LEVEL 05 31.010m 31.010m LEVEL 05 2575 MTL-02 2575 29.730m LEVEL 04 LEVEL 04 29.730m GL-02 BR-01 2600 2600 LEVEL 03 28.435m 28.435m LEVEL 03 2625 27.130m 2625 27.130m LEVEL 02 LEVEL 02 SIRIUS DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD 2595 2595 LEVEL 01 25.810m 25.810m LEVEL 01 CLIENT NUMBER 24.535m 24.535m B1a B1a 23.040m 2765 23.040m BR-01 PROJECT B1b GL-01 B1b B2a B2a 21.770m 21.770m 20.480m 20.480m B2b 19.000m B2b SIRIUS SITE 19.000m 2-60 CUMBERLAND ST, THE ROCKS Figure 14. Elevation of the northern pocket-park demonstrating the level change to Gloucester Walk below BVN PROJECT NUMBER Source: BVN Architects, GA North Elevation Streetscape, Plan AR-C-10-02 1712011 Draft Issue - Not for SSDA Issue DRAWING KEY 30 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus

1 GA - NORTH ELEVATION 2 GA - SOUTH ELEVATION GRAPHIC SCALE

0 2000 5000 SCALE

As indicated@A1 STATUS

FOR INFORMATION DRAWING

NOTE: Relative Levels (RLs) indicated may be within 150mm of final levels, due to survey discrepancies NORTH & SOUTH and allowing for building tolerances. ELEVATIONS - OVERALL ISSUE

AR-C-10-02 6 C:\REVIT_LOCAL2019\AR_1712011_SIR_SIRIUS_2019_Selina_Qiu.rvt 18/09/2020 11:26:44 AM Design Assessment

4.6 Gloucester Walk 4.6.1 Natural surveillance Natural surveillance of Gloucester Walk will be achieved by Gloucester Walk is a public clifftop pedestrian walkway residents of the Sirius building, visitors to the commercial that traverses the top of the cutting above Atherden Street tennancies within the Sirius site and further along and Playfair Street and connects George Street with Argyle Gloucester Walk, and by members of the public utilising Street. The walkway provides views and vantage points Gloucester Walk and the through-site link within the Sirius over The Rocks area and to Circular Quay beyond. The site. existing Sirius building presents a 120m long elevation to Gloucester Walk. The presence of neighbouring sites will help improve natural surveillance by increasing the number of people As part of the proposed restoration and refurbishment who can observe potential criminal or anti-social behaviour of the Sirius building, the existing security screen to the and ultimately report offending behaviour. Neighbouring basement carpark will be replaced by a mix of residential sites include the Mercantile Hotel at the George Street and retail tenancies. Additionally, off-site works are side of Gloucester Walk, which has approval for a new proposed to upgrade Gloucester Walk. The works will roof-top terrace that will overlook Gloucester Walk, as well activate and enliven the walkway as it passes the Sirius as the commercial office building at 86-88 Cumberland site. Street to the south of the site. Additionally, people using the pocket-park to the north of the Sirius site will be able to It is noted that further consultation with Place Management view Gloucester Walk from above. will be undertaken regarding the proposed public domain upgrades and off-site works. The use of glazing to the Sirius building’s eastern façade will facilitate natural surveillance of the space by residents of the building.

Figure 15. Natural surveillance of Gloucester Walk Source: 360° Landscape Architects Public Domain - Site Plan, with Architectus overlay of sight-lines

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 31

The landscape design for Gloucester Walk will remove 4.6.3 Territorial reinforcement some of the existing shrubbery, allowing for clear Gloucester Walk is a public walkway and will be open wayfinding and visibility along the length of the walkway for to the general public at all times. Upgrades to the brick users. Ongoing landscape maintenance will be required to paving in consultation with Place Management will ensure ensure that tree canopies are kept several metres above Gloucester Walk feels part of The Rocks precinct. the ground to remove opportunities for hiding places or areas where activity cannot be observed. Signage and lighting will be used to demonstrate the space is cared for and encourage people to feel some Given that the proposal is for the restoration and responsibility for its use and condition. refurbishment of the existing Sirius building, and will significantly retain the building’s existing structures, it 4.6.4 Space management is understood that the building may have elements that create hidden corners where natural surveillance is not Gloucester Walk will be maintained under current optimal. The proposed architectural and landscape design arrangements by Place Management. aims to improve these areas by improving sight-lines and opportunities for natural surveillance through activation of Any new street furniture should be provided with vandal the public domain. resistant materials, fittings and fixtures to reduce the potential for vandalism. Existing street lighting and CCTV cameras along Gloucester Walk will be retained to aid surveillance and Cleanliness of the site should be maintained at all times new lighting and CCTV cameras will be provided at the to demonstrate guardianship of the space. Vandalised residential entrance to the building. elements should be quickly repaired and graffiti should be removed promptly to show that the space is cared for by 4.6.2 Access control the community. Gloucester Walk is a public walkway and will be open to the general public at all times. Pedestrians will be encouraged to utilise Gloucester Walk to move between George Street and Argyle Street, to access Cumberland Street via the through-site link, and to access the retail tenancies, offices and public spaces along Gloucester Walk.

The use of brick paving and landscaping along Gloucester Walk will assist with wayfinding and help channel pedestrians along the walkway. Wayfinding signage will clearly designate public spaces and help to identify where legitimate access is for this space and provide directions for users to reach their intended destination.

Physical barriers will be provided at the entrances to the residential lobbies to the Sirius building and entrances to SoHo apartments.

32 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus 5 Conclusion and recommendations Conclusion and recommendations

5.1 Conclusion diverse use of spaces. – Access control: decreasing opportunities for crime This CPTED report has been prepared in relation to the by controlling access to crime targets through proposed restoration and refurbishment of the existing environmental markers, symbolic barriers or physical Sirius building, including alterations and additions. This barriers. report provides commentary on the proposed architectural and landscape design for the site in consideration of – Territorial reinforcement: clearly defining private space best security practices to mitigate opportunities for crime from semi-public and public space in order to create a or antisocial behaviour. Significant attempts have been sense of ownership and responsibility. made to improve the safety, security and amenity of – Space management: formal supervision, control and the building through the restoration and refurbishment care of spaces. process, however it is noted that the Sirius building is an existing building and therefore interventions to mitigate This CPTED report has identified how these principles opportunities for crime are limited to alterations and are implemented in the following key publicly accessible additions to the building. spaces:

On review of the demographic and crime statistics for The 1. The Cumberland Street frontage and Cumberland Rocks (as provided at Table 1), the area has a relatively Street forecourt; high incidence of crime. Sydney CBD is located to the 2. The through-site link; south of the site (approximately 1km to Martin Place) and also has a relatively high incidence of crime compared with 3. The northern pocket-park; and NSW rates per 100,000 people. Refer to the localised crime 4. Gloucester Walk. hotspot maps at Appendix A which demonstrate select offence types. The proposed architectural design prepared by BVN Architects and landscape design prepared by 360° The CPTED principles used to assess the proposed Landscape Architects for the restoration and refurbishment architectural and landscape design for the Sirius site are of the site (plans as listed at Table 2) is considered to be based on the CPTED Guidelines, as summarised below. acceptable from a crime prevention, safety and security perspective. The proposed design is not considered to – Natural surveillance: creating environments that keep have a detrimental impact on the safety of the surrounding intruders under observation by creating clear sight-lines area, subject to adopting key strategies to guide the future and activating public spaces to encourage regular and

34 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Figure 16. Photomontage of the proposed Sirius site View of the Gloucester Walk forecourt Source: BVN, August 2020

development of the site. the length of the Sirius building’s frontage to Gloucester Walk. 5.2 Recommendations – Wayfinding: Provide clear signage at key points that clearly indicates designated pathways through the site The proposed restoration and refurbishment of the for visitors. Use design features (paving, landscaping, Sirius building should incorporate design elements that public art) to assist with wayfinding and help channel contribute to the reduction in criminal and anti-social pedestrians through the site, while mitigating against behaviour in The Rocks area where possible, and provide pedestrians unintentionally moving into areas where best practice built environment outcomes to mitigate they cannot be observed. opportunities for criminal offences to occur. – Landscaping: Improve and embellish public and private In consideration of the design assessment, the following spaces using landscaping and trees to encourage recommendations are suggested for implementation at activation and community ownership of spaces. Ensure the Sirius site. These recommendations primarily include landscaping is maintained and tree canopies are kept natural surveillance and space management measures to several metres above the ground to remove areas improve the CPTED characteristics of the current plans. where activity cannot be observed. – Infrastructure protection: Provide fixtures, fittings and These recommendations are: surfaces that are vandal or graffiti resistant and easy to – Lighting: Improve street lighting, pedestrian lighting and clean. Ensure regular maintenance of infrastructure and feature lighting that supports natural surveillance and prompt removal of graffiti and vandalism. allows residents of the building, visitors and the general public to safely observe the space around them, especially during the evening and night time. Sufficient lighting should be provided to the building entrances, Cumberland Street forecourt, the through-site link and

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 35 A Appendix

Crime hotspot maps for specific offence types Sourced from BOCSAR website Crime Hotspots Maps

Figure 17. Crime Hotspot Map - Break and Enter Dwelling The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Figure 18. Crime Hotspot Map - Break and Enter Non-dwelling The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 37 Crime Hotspots Maps

Figure 19. Crime Hotspot Map - Domestic Assault The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Figure 20. Crime Hotspot Map - Non-domestic Assault The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

38 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Crime Hotspots Maps

Figure 21. Crime Hotspot Map - Motor Vehicle Theft The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Figure 22. Crime Hotspot Map - Steal from a Motor Vehicle The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 39 Crime Hotspots Maps

Figure 23. Crime Hotspot Map - Steal from a Dwelling The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Figure 24. Crime Hotspot Map - Steal from a Person The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

40 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Crime Hotspots Maps

Figure 25. Crime Hotspot Map - Malicious Damage to Property The Rocks suburb outlined in blue Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 41 B Appendix

List of Architectural and Landscape Plans Crime Hotspots Maps

Table 2. List of Architectural and Landscape Plans Architectural Drawings prepared by BVN Architects Drawing No Revision Name of Plan Date A-00-01 2 Cover Sheet 18 September 2020 A-00-02 4 Drawing List 27 October 2020 A-00-03 2 Local Context Plan 18 September 2020 A-00-04 2 Site Context Plan 18 September 2020 A-00-05 2 Lot Boundary / Site Area 18 September 2020 A-00-06 2 Exsitng Site Plan 18 September 2020 A-00-07 8 Proposed Site Plan 18 September 2020 A-00-08 2 Environmental Analysis 18 September 2020 A-00-09 2 Bulk Earth Work Plan 18 September 2020 B-10-01 29 Basement B2b-B2a 23 October 2020 B-10-02 25 Basement B1b-B1a 27 October 2020 B-10-03 18 Level 01-03 23 October 2020 B-10-04 19 Level 03-05 28 October 2020 B-10-05 14 Level 05-07 18 September 2020 B-10-06 13 Level 07-09 18 September 2020 B-10-07 13 Level 09-11 18 September 2020 B-10-08 12 Level 11-13 18 September 2020 B-10-09 12 Level 13-15 18 September 2020 B-10-10 12 Level 15-17 18 September 2020 B-10-11 11 Level 18-19 18 September 2020 B-10-12 11 Level 20-21 18 September 2020 B-10-13 12 Level 22-23 18 September 2020 B-10-14 8 Level 24-27 18 September 2020 B-10-15 5 Roof Plan 18 September 2020 B-11-61 3 DDA Apartments_Type 3H and 3F 18 September 2020 B-10-62 4 Liveable Apartments 23 October 2020 B-21-01 4 Basesment B2b-Ba Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-02 4 Basement B2b-Ba Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-03 4 Level 01-03 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-04 5 Level 03-05 Demolition 23 October 2020 B-21-05 4 Level 05-07 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-06 4 Level 07-09 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-07 4 Level 09-11 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-08 4 Level 11-13 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-09 4 Level 13-15 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-10 4 Level 15-17 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-11 4 Level 17-19 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-12 4 Level 19-21 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-13 4 Level 21-23 Demolition 18 September 2020 B-21-14 4 Level 23-24 Demolition 18 September 2020

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 43 Conclusion and recommendations

B-21-15 4 Level 24-25 Demolition and Plant 18 September 2020 Demolition B-31-01 5 Demolition – East and West Elevations 23 October 2020 B-31-02 4 Demolition – North and South Elevations 18 September 2020 C-10-00 9 East and West Elevations – Streetscape 23 October 2020 C-10-01 8 East and West Elevations – Sirius Building 23 October 2020 C-10-02 6 North and South Elevations – Overall 18 September 2020 C-10-03 6 North and South Elevations – Sirius tower 18 September 2020 C-10-04 4 North and South Elevations – Cumberland 18 September 2020 Building C-10-05 2 Material Board 18 September 2020 C-11-01 1 Typical façade details – west elevation 18 September 2020 C-11-02 1 Typical façade details – north elevation 18 September 2020 D-10-01 7 Sections 18 September 2020 D-10-02 3 Sections 18 September 2020 T-30-01 2 ADG Part 3B – overshadow analysis 25 September 2020 T-30-02 4 ADG Part 3B – overshadow analysis 25 September 2020 T-40-01 2 ADG Part 4A – solar analysis 18 September 2020 T-40-02 2 ADG Part 4A – solar analysis 18 September 2020 T-40-20 3 ADG Part 4B – ventilation analysis 23 October 2020 T-40-21 2 ADG Part 4B – ventilation analysis 18 September 2020 T-40-22 3 ADG Party 4B – ventilation analyiss 23 October 2020 T-40-23 6 Apartment Schedule / Mix / Storage 23 October 2020 U-10-01 11 GFA level B2b-11 27 October 2020 U-10-02 9 GFA level 12-plant 18 September 2020 U-10-03 11 GFA schedule 27 October 2020 Landscape and Public Domain Drawings prepared by 360° Landscape Architects L- DA- 01 F Cover Page 27 October 2020 L- DA- 0 8 F Landscape plan - Basement B4-B3 27 October 2020 L- DA- 0 9 F Landscape plan - Basement B2-B1 27 October 2020 L- DA-10 F Landscape plan - Level 01-03 27 October 2020 L- DA-11 F Landscape plan - Level 03-05 27 October 2020 L- DA-12 F Consolidated Ground Floor/ Public 27 October 2020 Domain Plan L- DA-13 F Landscape plan - Level 05-07 27 October 2020 L- DA-14 F Landscape plan - Level 07-09 27 October 2020 L- DA-15 F Landscape plan - Level 09-11 27 October 2020 L- DA-16 F Landscape plan - Level 11-13 27 October 2020 L- DA-17 F Landscape plan - Level 13-15 27 October 2020 L- DA-18 F Landscape plan - Level 15-17 27 October 2020 L- DA-19 F Landscape plan - Level 18-19 27 October 2020 L- DA-20 F Landscape plan - Level 20-21 27 October 2020 L-DA-21 F Landscape plan - Level 24-25 27 October 2020 L- DA-2 2 F Landscape plan - Level 27 27 October 2020

44 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) | Architectus Conclusion and recommendations

L- DA-23 F Consolidated rood plan 27 October 2020 L- DA-24 F Typical private roof terrace 27 October 2020 L- DA-25 F Typical non-accessible green roof 27 October 2020 L- DA-26 F Planting palette - trees 27 October 2020 L- DA-27 F Planting palette - ground floor and 27 October 2020 courtyards L- DA-28 F Planting palette - green roofs 27 October 2020 L- DA-2 9 F Boundary Wall / Fence Plan 27 October 2020 L- DA-3 0 F Cumberland St Elevation 27 October 2020

Architectus | Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design | 2–60 Cumberland Street, The Rocks (Sirius Site) 45