DOCSLIB.ORG

Enoplea: Mermithidae) in a Southeast Asian Spider (Araneae: Araneidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enoplea: Mermithidae) in a Southeast Asian Spider (Araneae: Araneidae) ©2019 Institute of Parasitology, SAS, Košice DOI 10.2478/helm­2019­0012 HELMINTHOLOGIA, 56, 2: 157 – 167, 2019 First report on mermithid parasitism (Enoplea: Mermithidae) in a Southeast Asian spider (Araneae: Araneidae) O. KOŠULIČ1, Š. MAŠOVÁ2* 1Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel­University­in­Brno,­Zemědělská­3,­Brno­613­00,­Czech­Republic;­2*Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk­University,­Kotlářská­2,­Brno­611­37,­Czech­Republic,­E-mail:­[email protected] Article info Summary Received­February­1,­2019 Details­about­the­record­of­a­juvenile­mermithid­roundworm­parasitizing­the­bark­spider­Caerostris Accepted­February­14,­2019 sumatrana Strand,­1915­from­Thailand­are­presented.­The­morphology­and­ecology­of­both­organ- isms­is­discussed.­Morphological­features­suggest­this­juvenile­nematode­belongs­to­the­genus­cf.­ Aranimermis.­Due­to­the­subadult­stage­of­parasite,­identifi­cation­to­species-level­was­not­possible.­ This­fi­rst­report­of­a­nematode­infection­in­C. sumatrana­with­several­recent­fi­ndings­from­other­ studies­signifi­cantly­adds­to­the­current­inventory­of­mermithids­parasitizing­spiders.­Moreover,­our­ fi­nding­is­among­the­fi­rst­record­of­this­host-parasite­interaction­from­Southeast­Asia. Keywords: Agamomermis;­Aranimermis;­Caerostris sumatrana;­orb-web­spider;­parasitoid;­Thailand Introduction nar,­1987;­Meyer,­2014).­Apart­from­spiders,­mermithids­can­also­ be­ found­ parasitizing­ in­ mosquitoes,­ grasshoppers,­ butterfl­ies,­ Spiders­ are­ top-predators­ in­ arthropod­ communities­ playing­ an­ damselfl­ies­ or­ cockroaches­ (Meyer,­ 2014).­ However,­ for­ many­ important role in insect reduction (Marc et al.,­1999;­Michalko­&­ mermithids,­the­host­species­is­still­unknown­(Nickle,­1972).­ Pekár,­ 2015;­ Michalko­ et al.,­ 2019).­ However,­ there­ are­ many­ Up­to­now,­only­the­following­mermithid­genera­have­been­record- groups­of­invertebrates­that­also­feed­on­spiders.­In­this­respect,­ ed­ to­ parasite­ on­ spiders:­ Mermis­ Dujardin,­ 1845;­ Hexamermis parasites and parasitoids are among the very important group Steiner,­1924;­Agamermis­Cobb,­Steiner­&­Christie,­1923;­Hey­ of­natural­enemies­of­spiders.­Recently,­records­of­the­parasites­ denius Taylor,­1935­and­Arachnomermis­Rubtsov,­1978­(Poinar,­ and­parasitoids­of­spiders­are­becoming­more­frequent­and­many­ 1985;­ Poinar,­ 2000;­ Poinar,­ 2012).­ Further,­ Poinar­ and­ Welch­ authors­ have­ described­ occurrences­ of­ parasitisation­ by­ hyme- (1981)­erected­a­collective­genus­Agamomermis­for­all­identifi­ca- nopterous,­dipterous,­and­neuropterous­parasitoids­(e.g.­Allard­&­ tions­based­on­juvenile­material­unsuitable­for­species­identifi­ca- Robertson,­2003;­Finch,­2005;­Takasuka­et al.,­2017).­However,­ tion­(Poinar,­1987;­Allard­and­Robertson,­2003).­Afterwards,­Poin- very­little­is­known­about­the­relevance­of­nematode­parasitism­in­ ar­and­Benton­(1986)­and­Poinar­&­Early­(1990)­provided­the­fi­rst­ spiders­(Poinar,­1987;­Penney­&­Bennett,­2006).­These­fi­ndings­ descriptions­based­on­adult­specimens­of­mermithids­and­erected­ are­rare­and­the­parasite­is­usually­not­identifi­ed­to­species­or­even­ the genus Aranimermis­with­a­general­characterization­of­this­dis- genus­due­to­the­diffi­culties­in­identifi­cation­which­require­fully­ma- tinctive­genus­that­is­trophically­specialized­on­spiders.­ ture­adult­specimens­(Poinar,­1987;­Penney­&­Bennett,­2006).­All­ Parasitism­by­a­mermithid­is­fatal­to­the­host­(Nikdel­et al.,­2011;­ of­known­reports­of­natural­nematode­parasitism­in­spiders­be- Poinar,­ 1983).­ The­ life­ cycle­ including­ fi­ve­ stages­ is­ described­ long to the group of parasitoids from the family Mermithidae (order in­Poinar­(1983):­egg,­second­stage­juvenile­(preparasitic­infec- Mermithida),­which­generally­parasitize­on­invertebrates­only­(Poi- tive­ juvenile),­ parasitic­ third­ stage­ juvenile,­ mature­ third­ stage­ * – corresponding author 157 Fig.­1.­Distribution­map­of­mermithids­parasiting­in­spiders­throughout­the­whole­area­of­Asia.­All­seven­records­(blue­circles)­from­Asia­are­taken­from­the­following­ literature:­Okochi­(1969);­Matsuda­(1999);­Iida­and­Hasegawa­(2003);­Zamani­(2014);­Ranade­and­Prakash­(2016).­Our­finding­is­marked­by­red­coloured­circle­ (for­locality­description­see­Material­and­Methods). ­postparasitic­ juvenile,­ two­ molts­ into­ adult.­ These­ parasitoids­ trana­Strand,­1915­from­the­region­of­Southeast­Asia­along­with­ have­ parenteral­ intake­ of­ nutrition­ from­ the­ host­ tissues­ and­ ecological­notes­on­the­distributions­of­spider­mermithids.­To­date,­ haemolymph­which­may­strongly­influence­the­physiological­con- there­are­no­records­of­endoparasitism­by­nematodes­in­orb-web­ dition­of­the­host­since­the­first­instars­of­parasite­development­ spiders from the Asian region and furthermore, there are not even (Nikdel­et al.,­2011).­Afterwards,­during­the­emergence­of­the­(still­ reports of mermithids in any groups of spiders from Southeast juvenile)­parasite,­the­mermithid­nematode­kills­its­host­(Poinar,­ Asia.­The­postparasitic­juvenile­stage­is­described­and­its­charac- 1987).­In­this­postparasitic­free-living­stage,­the­parasite­does­not­ teristics­are­illustrated.­The­list­of­records­of­mermithid­infections­ feed­anymore­and­only­needs­a­suitable­habitat­to­mature. made­by­Poinar­(1987)­and­Penney­&­Bennett­(2006)­is­updated­ Spiders­ from­ a­ variety­ of­ functional­ guilds­ can­ be­ infected­ with­ according­to­the­recent­findings­(Rodrigues­et al.,­2005;­Meyer,­ mermithids.­An­important­factor­for­the­completion­of­these­nem- 2014;­Zamani,­2014;­Ranade­&­Prakash,­2016)­and­amended­with­ atodes’­life­cycle­is­the­presence­of­water,­wet­soil,­or­mud­where­ the­location­and­region­of­the­host-parasite­finding.­ they can mature after emergence from the spider host (Poinar, 1987;­Meyer,­2014).­Regardless,­the­ground­dwelling­and­active­ Materials and methods hunter­spiders­are­parasitized­more­often­in­comparison­with­orb­ web­or­space­web­spiders­(e.g.­Penney­&­Bennett,­2006;­Zamani,­ The­two­Caerostris spiders­were­collected­on­the­edge­of­a­dry­ 2014).­Usually,­spiders­become­infected­by­ingesting­a­paraten- evergreen­forest­in­the­Phethaburi­province­of­Ban­Lat­district­in­ ic­host­or­directly­by­being­penetrated­by­an­infective­larva­that­ the­central­part­of­Thailand­(12°96’85”N,­99°66’53”E;­Fig.­1).­The­ has­recently­hatched­out­from­eggs­(Penney­&­Bennett,­2006).­ hilly­landscape­area­of­the­locality­was­at­an­altitude­of­300-400­m­ Infected­spiders­may­show­symptoms­such­as­an­enlarged­and­ a.s.l.­The­area­from­which­the­parasitized­spider­was­collected­was­ deformed­abdomen,­deformed­copulation­structures,­or­deformed­ sheltered­by­a­dense­canopy­of­dry­evergreen­forest­with­presence­ legs.­Moreover,­they­may­show­changes­in­behaviour­such­as­leth- of­river­streams­and­small­patches­of­disturbed­and­logged­forest­ argy,­slower­reaction­times­to­predators,­and­a­tendency­to­move­ stands.­Spiders­were­sampled­during­rainy­season­(July­2014),­ towards­water­(Poinar,­1985;­Pizzi,­2009;­Meyer,­2014).­ thus­ the­ environment­ in­ the­ location­ was­ very­ humid­ and­ influ- The­purpose­of­the­present­paper­is­to­report­the­first­finding­of­ enced­ by­ short-term­ heavy­ rains.­ Specimens­ were­ collected­ at­ a­mermithid­nematode,­which­parasites­in­the­Caerostris suma­ night­by­visually­searching­and­removing­individuals­directly­from­ 158 Table­1.­Summary­of­all­records­of­mermithids­from­spiders­around­the­world.­ *­Unknown­country,­however­the­geographic­region­can­be­determined­by­the­distribution­of­the­spider­host.­Spider­families­alphabetically­arranged. Family Host of mermithid Hunting guild Mermithid Country Continent Reference Agelenidae Agelenopsis oregonensis Sheet­web­ species inquirendae USA North­America in­Poinar­(1987) Chamberlin­&­Ivie­1935 weavers Amaurobiidae Eurocoelotes inermis (L.­Koch­1855) Sheet­web­ species inquirendae Germany Europe in­Poinar­(1987) weavers Antrodiaetidae Atypoides riversi O.P.-Cambridge­1833 Sensing­web­ species inquirendae USA North­America in­Poinar­(1987) weavers Anyphaenidae Wulfila albens (Hentz,­1847) Other­hunters Aranimermis aptispicula USA North­America in­Poinar­(1987) Poinar­&­Benton,­1986 Araneidae Aculepeira ceropegia (Walckenaer­1802) Orb­web­ species inquirendae UK­ Europe in­Poinar­(1987) weavers Araneidae Araneus diadematus Clerck­1757 Orb­web­ species inquirendae UK­ Europe in­Poinar­(1987) weavers Araneidae Verrucosa arenata (Walckenaer­1842) Orb­web­ Aranimermis aptispicula USA North­America in­Poinar­(1987) weavers Poinar­&­Benton,­1986 Ctenidae Leptoctenus byrrhus Simon­1888 Other­hunters species inquirendae UK­ Europe Poinar­(2000)­in­Penney­&­ Bennet­(2006) Cybaeidae Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck­1757) Sheet­web­ species inquirendae UK­ Europe in­Poinar­(1987) weavers Gnaphosidae Cesonia bilineata (Hentz­1847) Ground hunters Aranimermis aptispicula USA North­America in­Poinar­(1987) Poinar­&­Benton,­1986 Gnaphosidae Gnaphosa lucifuga (Walckenaer­1802) Ground hunters species inquirendae Germany Europe in­Poinar­(1987) Hexathelidae Porrhothele antipodiana Sheet­web­ Aranimermis giganteus New­Zealand Australia Poinar­&­Early­(1990)­in­ (Walckenaer­1837) weavers Poinar­&­Early,­1990 Penney­&­Bennet­(2006) Idiopidae Misgolas borealis (Forster­1968) Sensing­web­ Aranimermis giganteus New­Zealand Australia Poinar­&­Early­(1990)­in­ weavers Poinar­&­Early,­1990 Penney­&­Bennet­(2006) Linyphiidae Micryphantes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nematodes and Agriculture in Continental Argentina
    Fundam. appl. NemalOl., 1997.20 (6), 521-539 Forum article NEMATODES AND AGRICULTURE IN CONTINENTAL ARGENTINA. AN OVERVIEW Marcelo E. DOUCET and Marîa M.A. DE DOUCET Laboratorio de Nematologia, Centra de Zoologia Aplicada, Fant/tad de Cien.cias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, Casilla df Correo 122, 5000 C6rdoba, Argentina. Acceplecl for publication 5 November 1996. Summary - In Argentina, soil nematodes constitute a diverse group of invertebrates. This widely distributed group incJudes more than twO hundred currently valid species, among which the plant-parasitic and entomopathogenic nematodes are the most remarkable. The former includes species that cause damages to certain crops (mainly MeloicU:igyne spp, Nacobbus aberrans, Ditylenchus dipsaci, Tylenchulus semipenetrans, and Xiphinema index), the latter inc1udes various species of the Mermithidae family, and also the genera Steinernema and Helerorhabditis. There are few full-time nematologists in the country, and they work on taxonomy, distribution, host-parasite relationships, control, and different aspects of the biology of the major species. Due tO the importance of these organisms and the scarcity of information existing in Argentina about them, nematology can be considered a promising field for basic and applied research. Résumé - Les nématodes et l'agriculture en Argentine. Un aperçu général - Les nématodes du sol représentent en Argentine un groupe très diversifiè. Ayant une vaste répartition géographique, il comprend actuellement plus de deux cents espèces, celles parasitant les plantes et les insectes étant considèrées comme les plus importantes. Les espèces du genre Me/oi­ dogyne, ainsi que Nacobbus aberrans, Dùylenchus dipsaci, Tylenchulus semipenetrans et Xiphinema index représentent un réel danger pour certaines cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae) Parasite–Host Association
    2006. The Journal of Arachnology 34:273–278 SHORT COMMUNICATION FIRST UNEQUIVOCAL MERMITHID–LINYPHIID (ARANEAE) PARASITE–HOST ASSOCIATION David Penney: Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Susan P. Bennett: Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK. ABSTRACT. The first description of a Mermithidae–Linyphiidae parasite–host association is presented. The nematode is preserved exiting the abdomen of the host, which is a juvenile Tenuiphantes species (Araneae, Linyphiidae), collected from the Isle of Mull, UK. An updated taxonomic list of known mer- mithid spider hosts is provided. The ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the direct and indirect life cycles of mermithid worms suggests that both occur in spiders. Keywords: Aranimermis, Isle of Mull, Linyphiidae, Mermithidae, Nematoda Nematode parasites of spiders are restricted to an updated and taxonomically correct list in Table the family Mermithidae but are not uncommon 1. Here we describe the first Mermithidae–Liny- (Poinar 1985, 1987) and were first reported almost phiidae parasite–host association and discuss the two and a half centuries ago (Roesel 1761). How- ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the ever, given the difficulty of identifying and rearing life cycles of mermithid worms. post-parasitic juvenile mermithids, they have re- This paper concerns three spider specimens, one ceived inadequate systematic treatment (Poinar with a worm in situ and two that are presumed to 1985). In addition, the complete life history is have been parasitized, but from which the worms known for only one species of these spider parasites have emerged and are lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumamermis Zealandica N. Sp. (Mermithidae
    Systematic Parasitology 53: 227–233, 2002. 227 © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Thaumamermis zealandica n. sp. (Mermithidae: Nematoda) parasitising the intertidal marine amphipod Talorchestia quoyana (Talitridae: Amphipoda) in New Zealand, with a summary of mermithids infecting amphipods George Poinar Jr1,A.DavidM.Latham2 & Robert Poulin2 1Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA 2Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand Accepted for publication 30th April, 2002 Abstract A new nematode, Thaumamermis zealandica n. sp. (Mermithidae; Nematoda), is described parasitising the in- tertidal marine amphipod Talorchestia quoyana Milne-Edwards (Talitridae) from the coast of South Island, New Zealand. The new species is characterised by the degree of dimorphism of the spicules, the arrangement of the genital papillae, the shape and length of the vagina and the anteriorly-placed amphids. This is the first known marine host of a member of the family Mermithidae. Published records of mermithid nematodes from amphipods are presented. Introduction likely to harbour mermithids (Poulin & Rate, 2001). Hosts were maintained in the laboratory in moist sand The family Mermithidae Braun, 1883 constitutes a at room temperature and under a natural photoperiod. unique group of nematodes, which parasitise a wide Post-parasitic juvenile mermithids that emerged from range of invertebrates, especially insects (Poinar, their hosts within 10 days of capture were used for 1983). Crustaceans are unusual hosts for mermithids the following description. They were maintained in and are limited to terrestrial members of the Isopoda wet sand until they moulted and initiated mating, then (see Poinar, 1981) and fresh-water representatives of were killed in hot water (75 ◦C), fixed in 5% forma- the Amphipoda, with hosts in the families Gammari- lin and processed to glycerine for taxonomic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Helminth Eggs from Early Cretaceous Faeces Sandra Barrios‑De Pedro1*, Antonio Osuna2,3 & Ángela D
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Helminth eggs from early cretaceous faeces Sandra Barrios‑de Pedro1*, Antonio Osuna2,3 & Ángela D. Buscalioni1 The exceptional fossil site of Las Hoyas (upper Barremian, Cuenca, Spain) yields abundant small to medium vertebrate coprolites, hindering the search for parasites. We studied the contents of 29 coprolites that were previously classifed into distinct morphotypes. Several parasitic eggs were retrieved from two of these coprolites, confrming the second record of digenea trematode eggs and nematode (ascaridid) eggs from an Early Cretaceous locality. The cylindrical coprolite containing anisakid eggs was likely produced by a crocodylomorph as the parasite host, whereas the bump‑headed lace coprolite indicates the role of a fsh as an intermediary or defnitive host of the trematodes and ascaridids. These trace and body fossils show that the Las Hoyas 126–129 Ma lacustrine ecosystem documents the early connection between basal Gonorynchiformes fsh and digenetic trematodes. Te identifcation of parasitic material in coprolites (fossil faeces) remains a challenge, but can provide sub- stantial information on the habitat of parasitic hosts and the feeding habits of infected animals. However, the identifcation of parasites in fossil faeces is complex since such parasites must be accurately located to avoid their destruction. Furthermore, these parasites need to be preserved and they must be recognized according to their modern analogues. Fossil parasites are mostly in eggs and cysts whose preservation depends on the presence of layers that degrade slowly and conditions that favour the integrity of the faecal mass. For example, preserva- tion of coprolites bearing parasite remains would have been aided by quick drying to prevent the dispersion of parasitic elements, occurring in an anaerobic environment to slow the destruction of the faecal mass by bacteria and fungi, and quick covering by microbial bioflms and mats1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographia Trichopterorum
    Entry numbers checked/adjusted: 23/10/12 Bibliographia Trichopterorum Volume 4 1991-2000 (Preliminary) ©Andrew P.Nimmo 106-29 Ave NW, EDMONTON, Alberta, Canada T6J 4H6 e-mail: [email protected] [As at 25/3/14] 2 LITERATURE CITATIONS [*indicates that I have a copy of the paper in question] 0001 Anon. 1993. Studies on the structure and function of river ecosystems of the Far East, 2. Rep. on work supported by Japan Soc. Promot. Sci. 1992. 82 pp. TN. 0002 * . 1994. Gunter Brückerman. 19.12.1960 12.2.1994. Braueria 21:7. [Photo only]. 0003 . 1994. New kind of fly discovered in Man.[itoba]. Eco Briefs, Edmonton Journal. Sept. 4. 0004 . 1997. Caddis biodiversity. Weta 20:40-41. ZRan 134-03000625 & 00002404. 0005 . 1997. Rote Liste gefahrdeter Tiere und Pflanzen des Burgenlandes. BFB-Ber. 87: 1-33. ZRan 135-02001470. 0006 1998. Floods have their benefits. Current Sci., Weekly Reader Corp. 84(1):12. 0007 . 1999. Short reports. Taxa new to Finland, new provincial records and deletions from the fauna of Finland. Ent. Fenn. 10:1-5. ZRan 136-02000496. 0008 . 2000. Entomology report. Sandnats 22(3):10-12, 20. ZRan 137-09000211. 0009 . 2000. Short reports. Ent. Fenn. 11:1-4. ZRan 136-03000823. 0010 * . 2000. Nattsländor - Trichoptera. pp 285-296. In: Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2000. The 2000 Red List of Swedish species. ed. U.Gärdenfors. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala. ISBN 91 88506 23 1 0011 Aagaard, K., J.O.Solem, T.Nost, & O.Hanssen. 1997. The macrobenthos of the pristine stre- am, Skiftesaa, Haeylandet, Norway. Hydrobiologia 348:81-94.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 New Fossil Nematodes in Dominican and Baltic Amber George O
    New fossil nematodes in Dominican and Baltic amber George O POINAR JR Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Received: 2011: revised: 2011 Accepted for publication: 2011 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Summary- Four new species of fossil mermithids (Nematoda: Mermithidae) are described from amber: Heydenius arachnius n. sp. from a spider (Arachnida: Araneae) in Dominican amber, Heydenius phasmatophilus n. sp., from a walking stick (Phasmatodea: Phasmatidae) in Baltic amber, Heydenius podenasae n. sp. from a moth (Lepidoptera) in Baltic amber and Heydenius trichorosus n. sp. from a caddis fly (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) in Baltic amber. With previous descriptions of fossil mermithids from Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera and Hemiptera, there are now representatives of seven insect orders as hosts of fossil mermithids. With these additional four fossils, the total number of described nematode fossils is now 90 with 70 occurring in amber. Keywords – Heydenius arachnius, Heydenius phasmatophilus, Heydenius podenasae, Heydenius trichorosus, Lepidoptera, Trichoptera, Phasmatodea. 2 After publication of The evolutionary history of nematodes (Poinar, 2011), several new nematode fossils were made available to the author. These specimens, which are described in the present work, include mermithids infecting a spider in Dominican amber and a moth, caddis fly and walking stick in Baltic amber. Materials and methods The piece of amber containing the fossil spider originated from mines in the Cordillera Septentrional mountain range in the northern portion of the Dominican Republic. Dating of Dominican amber is controversial with the latest proposed age of 20-15 mya based on foraminifera (Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1996) and the earliest of 45-30 mya based on coccoliths (Cêpek in Schlee, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Cucumber Beetle, Diabrotica Balteata Leconte (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)1 John L
    EENY-093 Banded Cucumber Beetle, Diabrotica balteata LeConte (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Introduction and Distribution Larva The banded cucumber beetle is basically a tropical insect, The three instars have mean head capsule widths measuring and until the early 1900s, its distribution in the United about 0.24, 0.35, and 0.51 mm, respectively. The body States was limited to southern Arizona and Texas (Saba length during these instars is reported to be about 2.3, 4.5, 1970), and south through Mexico and Central America and 8.9 mm. Larval color is somewhat variable; initially it is (Krysan 1986). It has since expanded its range throughout white, but may also take on a pale yellow color depending the southern United States from North Carolina to on the food source. Development time is temperature southern California, though its intolerance to freezing dependent, but the range is about 4–8, 3–11, and 4–15 days temperatures probably limits its northward distribution for instars 1 to 3, respectively. Total larval development to its current status. Within Florida it is most abundant in time is usually 11–17 days. the organic soils near Lake Okeechobee, though it occurs throughout the state, where it is known as a vegetable pest. Life Cycle and Description The banded cucumber beetle does not enter diapause (Saba 1970). It remains active as long as the weather remains favorable, with up to six to seven generations per year reported in Louisiana (Pitre and Kantack 1962) and Texas. Under optimal conditions, a life cycle can be completed in 45 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Insects and Mites: a Worldwide Catalogue of Pathogen and Nematode Introductions
    United States Department of Agriculture Classical Biological Control of Insects and Mites: A Worldwide Catalogue of Pathogen and Nematode Introductions Forest Forest Health Technology FHTET-2016-06 Service Enterprise Team July 2016 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET Classical Biological Control of Insects and Mites: as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ A Worldwide Catalogue of The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information Pathogen and Nematode Introductions and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. ANN E. HAJEK Department of Entomology Cover Image Cornell University Dr. Vincent D’Amico, Research Entomologist, U.S. Forest Service, Urban Forestry Unit, NRS-08, Newark, Delaware. Ithaca, New York, USA Cover image represents a gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) larva silking down from the leaves of an oak (Quercus) tree and being exposed to a diversity of pathogens (a fungus, SANA GARDESCU a bacterium, a virus and a microsporidium) and a nematode that are being released by a Department of Entomology human hand for biological control (not drawn to scale). Cornell University Ithaca, New York, USA In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling the 99%: Can We Begin to Understand the Paleoecology of the Small and Soft-Bodied Animal Majority?
    TACKLING THE 99%: CAN WE BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND THE PALEOECOLOGY OF THE SMALL AND SOFT-BODIED ANIMAL MAJORITY? ERIK A. SPERLING Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA <[email protected]> ABSTRACT.—Not all organisms have an equal chance of entering the fossil record. Previo—us attempts to quantify this percentage suggest that for megascopic marine organisms (megafauna), ~30% would be predicted to leave no identifiable fossils. Here, that exercise is repeated for marine macrofauna, for which ~80% are predicted to leave no identifiable fossils. The percentage will be far higher for meiofauna, the numerically most dominant marine animals. The organisms which are often most abundant in marine sediments, such as small polychaetes and nematodes, have essentially no fossil record. Yet such organisms are ecologically important in the modern oceans, and almost certainly were in ancient environments as well, so it is useful to consider the roles they play in different ecosystems. Insight into the evolution and paleoecology of these groups can be gained by using molecular divergence estimates to infer temporal origins combined with modern distributional and ecological data. As a case study, this approach is applied to the small and soft-bodied early animal fauna living under low levels of atmospheric oxygen that likely characterized the Precambrian. INTRODUCTION circumstances. In a seminal study of the megascopic intertidal fauna at Friday Harbor, “Here we have a fossil: what went wrong?” Washington, Schopf (1978) predicted that ~30% of species would leave many identifiable fossils, —Adolf Seilacher (2006, Extraordinary Glimpses regardless of whether they lived on mud, sand, or of Past Life course, Yale University) rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Poinar, G . O ., Jr . 1985 . Mermithid (Nematoda) Parasites of Spiders
    Poinar, G . O ., Jr. 1985 . Mermithid (Nematoda) parasites of spiders and harvestmen . J. Arachnol ., 13 :121-128 . MERMITHID (NEMATODA) PARASITE S OF SPIDERS AND HARVESTME N George O. Poinar, Jr. Division of Entomology and Parasitology University of Californi a Berkeley, California 9472 0 ABSTRACT Nematode parasites of spiders and harvestmen are restricted to members of the family Mermithi- dae. A literature review shows that nematode parasitism of arachnids is worldwide and at least 5 1 species of spiders and harvestmen have been recorded as hosts of mermithid nematodes . Infected spiders have varied habits and it is postulated that two types of parasite life cycles probably exist and that the indirect life cycle (involving a paratenic host which falls prey to the arachnid) is probably th e common type . INTRODUCTION Representatives of the family Mermithidae are the only nematodes known to parasitize spiders. Their effect on spiders is similar to that on other arthropod hosts, namely hos t mortality at the time of parasite emergence . The difficulty in rearing adult mermithids from postparasitic juveniles that have emerged from parasitized spiders has prevented a systematic assessment of spider mer- mithids . However, it is apparent that mermithid parasitism of spiders is widespread an d occurs in various habitats . The present work tabulates previous instances of these associa- tions, adds some, and discusses the host parasite relationship . Reports of spider parasitism by horsehair worms are not discussed here . The latter, commonly referred to as Gordius, are not nematodes and belong to a separate phylum, the Nematomorpha . Early reports o f spiders parasitized by the horsehair worms may actually have involved mermithid nema- todes and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Preliminary Studies on the Pathology Caused by Mermis nigrescens Duj. in Orthoptera Melvin W. Denner Department of Life Sciences Indiana State University Evansville, Evansville, Indiana 47712 Abstract Parasitic Mermis nigrescens Duj. juveniles may cause tissue damage during migra- tion within the host. As these juveniles develop, they may cause tissue distortion, under- development of structures, and mechanical damage to tissue. Mechanical damage by the parasite may act to reduce the number of eggs laid by the host grasshopper. Introduction The importance of mermithids as a possible means of biological control of insect pests has been recognized by a number of investigators (1, 6, 10, 11). The Uuited States Bureau of Plant Industry has used Agamermis decaudata and Mermis subnigrescens in an effort to control grasshopper populations. The government has also used members of the Mermithidae to control mosquito populations in the Arctic (2). Japansese investigators have reported that mermithids, parasitic in the rice borer, help to keep this pest within bounds (7, 12). The purpose of this paper is to present some of the initial observa- tions on the damage that M. nigrescens causes to the internal tissues of several host species of Orthoptera. These observations will be used to determine the extent of damage caused by the parasite and how this damage may play a role in the biological control of economically impor- tant Orthoptera. Methods All grasshoppers in this study were sacrificed using ethyl ether, then fixed in Bouin's fixative, washed in several changes of 50% ethyl alcohol, one change of 70% alcohol containing one per cent potassium acetate, and dehydrated according to the Martignoni (9) methyl benzoate method.
    [Show full text]