An Appreciation of Oystercatchers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Appreciation of Oystercatchers BEHAVIOR An appreciation of oystercatchers Olin Sewall Pettingill, Jr. MagellanicOystercatcher. Photo/O. S. Pettingill.Jr. BlackishOystercatcher. PhotolO. S. Pettingill, Jr YSTERCATCHERSare big, robust, Oystercatchersare so distinct from Mage!lanicOystercatcher (H. !eucopo- boldly markedshorebirds that inhab- othershorebirds that ornithologistshave dus, southern South America and the it long stretchesof the world's oceanic placedthem in a family by themselves; Falkland Islands). The other three are coasts.They are black and white or black and becausethey are so much alike blackor brownishblack: the Black Oys- all over. Their bills are twice the length throughouttheir worldwiderange, orni- tercatcher (H. bachmani, western North of theirheads, and red. Uponsuch pow- thologistshave groupedthem in the sin- America and the Aleutian Islands); the erful and wonderfullydesigned bills do gle genus Haematopus. Within their Sooty Oystercatcher(H. fuliginosus, the lives of oystercatchersdepend. range,however, oystercatchers differ re- Australia and New Zealand); and the Viewedfrom abovethe oystercatcher gionally in coloration and habitat selec- BlackishOystercatcher (H. ater, south- bill is sharplytipped, but viewed from the tion in sucha way that ornithologists ern South America and the Falkland Is- side, the bill tip is squaredoff; thusthe havebeen confounded as to how many lands).In all the speciesthe sexeslook bill is like an oysterknife,suited to open- speciesthere are. alike. ing bivalvemo!lusks-•oysters, mussels, Without reviewing here the lines of Along the Atlantic coast of North andclams--or like a wedge,for prying scientificreasoning and conflicting opin- America as well as in Iceland and New limpets off rocky surfaces. Since the ions, I will state categoricallythat the ZealandI have watchedoystercatchers mandiblesare of equal length, meeting consensusamong most American and occasionally,but neverfor any lengthof firmly at their tips, the bill can pick up Britishornithologists is that thereare six time. So often they were shy and flew foodfrom any flat surface.Furthermore, species.Three are conspicuouslyblack fartheraway whenever I attempted to get thebill, longas it is andrelatively inflexi- and white: the AmericanOystercatcher near them. It was only in the Falkland ble, can probedeeply into sandor soft (Haematopuspalliatus, southeasternand Islandsthat I really becameacquainted soil for wormsand insects.Quite apart southwesternNorth America, the Carib- with oystercatchers. from its capabilitiesfor securinga wide bean, and northern South America); the This archipelagoin the SouthAtlantic, varietyof food, the bill is alsoa formida- EurasianOystercatcher (H. ostralegus, 300 milesnortheast of thesouthern tip of ble weaponfor discouragingpotential Eurasiaincluding Iceland, southernAfri- South America, has two oystercatcher predatorsby painfuljabs. ca, Australia, and New Zealand); and the species,the Magellanicand the Blackish. Volume 39, Number I 3 Both speciesalso inhabitthe coastsof Unlikethe MageilanicOystercatchers, queee, weee, weee, wee, we. When two southern South America. For six months the Blackishfed almostentirely on mol- or morebirds together gave the series, the in the late springand summer of 1953- lusks that they found in abundanceon resultwas a remarkablemedley. Each 1954 and again for five month,in the rocksand ledgesbetween high and low bird. when utteringthe seriesin flight, same austrai seasonsof 1971-1972, my tidelines.Occasionally they flew beyond alternatedmoments of flappingits wings wife Eleanor and 1 were in the Falklands sightof theirhome shores to musselbeds. more slowly. butterfly-like with mo- for b•rd studyand photography.During also frequentedby Mageilanics. When mentsof settingits wingsand gliding. the latter stay we were accompaniedby both specieswere presentat the same My appreciationof each of the two Maurice A. E. Rumboil, my assistant. time--not uncommonly--I never saw Falkland oystercatcherswas attained in Inevitablywe gave both speciesconsid- anyevidence of hostility,but rathertotal separate stages. erable attention, as they were equally disregardof one another. MAGELLANIC OYSTERCATCHERS common, and. becausethey were insu- Boththe Magellanicand Blackishoys- lar, non-migratorybirds more or lessiso- tercatcherswere noisy. The most com- YFroST opportunity towatch these latedin an areawith a sparsehuman pop- moncall of the Mageilanicwas a piping strikinglyhandsome shorebirds for ulation and not subjectto predationby kleee-eeeee,loud and piercingwith a ris- any lengthof time was on December landmammals, they were muchless shy- ing inflection, uttered when flying or 1953, at CarcassIsland. Here, only a --hence more approachable--thanany standing.The call had great carrying shortdistance away on a beach,two for- oystercatchersI had observed elsewhere. power;we could hear it despitewind and agingMageilanics were suddenlyjoined The Mageilanic Oystercatcherswere surf.Among a varietyof othercalls was a by twoothers flying in from afar. At once mostlyresidents of the extensivesandy prolonged,plaintive I,ee-kee-kee-kee of- all fourbegan piping loudly as they drew beachesalong the two big islands, East ten given in flight, somtimesbutterfly- closertogether. What followeddefies co- Falkland and West Falkland, and some of like. Many timesour attentionwas drawn herentdescription. They quick-stepped the largeroutlying islands. The Blackish to a flock of several birds by hearing forward one beside another and occasion- Oystercatchers,on the other hand, re- themas they passedfar out from shore. allybobbed plover-like; they stopped and sided along the many rocky shores The most common vocalization of the faced one another, then turned away, throughoutthe archipelago.Thus, in an Blackish.given when flying or standing, sometimescompletely around to faceone ecologicalsense, the two specieswere was a piping quee-ee, clear and ascend- anotheragain. All this they did with separated,each occupying its own niche. ing but shorterand lesspiercing than the shouldershumped, necks arched, heads Although both specieswere equally Mageilanic's.An additionalvocalization occasionallyjerked up but bills always common,I first thoughtthat the Magei- that I never heard from the Mageilanic pointedstraight down, primariesslightly !anic was more numerous,chiefly be- was a series of loud, ringing, musical lowered,and tails lifted straightup, un- causeat the outsetwe spentmore time on sounds,ascending in a rapid, trill-like fanned. yet clearly showingthe white beacheswhere it wasconspicuous by vir- purrrrrr. followedby high-pitchedqueee basalportions. The entire performance, tue of its black and white plumageand notes. then by slower and descending accompaniedthroughout by pipingcalls orange-redbill. But later. aswe explored •'eee notes that gradually faded from that were variouslysharp, high-pitched. the shoresof rocky headlandsand many hearing. The sequencewas roughly: and discordant, was over in a minute or of the smallerislands with shoreslargely purrrrrr queee, queee, queee, queee, so. The visitingpair movedaway, then of rock, I soon realized that the Blackish Oystercatcherwas probably as numer- ous. My early misconceptionwas due to the bird's uniformly brownish black plumage,which blendedso effectively with thegrayish black rock strata,ledges, and bouldersthat a bird could be easily overlookedunless it moved or unlessby chanceI caughtsight of its scarletbill and stout, pinkishwhite Cuntanned") legs. Mageilanic Oystercatcherssought a w•devariety of foods.On the beachesat ebbingtide they probedfor sandworms andpicked up strandedjellyfish. If there were exposedrocky reefs, they foraged for musselsand limpets. Farther up on the beaches,beyond the normal tides. theyflipped over pebbles and small heaps of washed-upkelp and seaweed to uncov- er and catch whatever insects and crusta- ceansthere might bc underneath.Some- times they moved inland from the beachesto low, grassy wet areas near streams,where they probed, presumably for earthworms. BlackishOystercatcher opening mussel still attached to rock.PhotolO. S. PettingillJr. 4 AmericanBirds, Spring 1985 returned,and all four repeatedthe com- plex d•splay. Again the pair moved away, againthe pair returned,and so on for six separateperformances that were essentiallythe same. Not once did one bird chase another or show the least incli- nationto attack.After the last perform- ance,the visitingpair simplytook off in the direction l¾om whence they had come. I realizedthat I hadwitnessed the "pip- ing ceremony"that Europeanornitholo- gists have frequentlyobserved in their native EurasianOystercatcher and have describedin their publicationswhile ad- vancingtheir ideasof its function. I had neverseen any suchperformance in our AmericanOystercatcher. Again later in January,I watchedMa- gellanicspiping, this time when they were in smallgroups on a beachat New Island.Piping in eachcase was triggered MagellanicOystercatchers performing piping ceremony. Photo/O. S. Pettingill,Jr. as more Magellanicsjoined them. Both the arrivalsand the birdsalready present pipedloudly with billsdown and tails up; a close acquaintancewith Magellanics. the ground(displacement feeding), dab- therewas little moving or turningabout. Within easywalking distance of the little bingat the feathers(displacement preen- In a minuteor so the performancewas farm settlement were two nests about 50 ing), and then standingat intervalswith over. The newcomersstayed, apparently feet aparton a grassyflat ("sheeppas- bills slippedunder
Recommended publications
  • American Oystercatcher
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Haematopus palliatus (American Oystercatcher) Priority 3 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Aves (Birds) Order: Charadriiformes (Plovers, Sandpipers, And Allies) Family: Haematopodidae (Oystercatchers) General comments: First nesting record in Maine - 1994. 4 - 8 breeding pairs in Maine, range expansion, Northern Atlantic population 11,000 and considered stable. Listed as Critical risk category because of high vulnerability to climate change - Gilbrathe et al. 2014. Species Conservation Range Maps for American Oystercatcher: Town Map: Haematopus palliatus_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Haematopus palliatus_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: Haematopus palliatus is listed as a species of Special Concern in Maine. Recent Significant Declines: NA Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: United States Shorebird Conservation Plan: Species of High Concern North Atlantic Regional Shorebird Plan: Highly Imperiled United States Birds of Conservation Concern: Bird of Conservation Concern in Bird Conservation Regions 14 and/or 30: Yes High Climate Change Vulnerability: Vulnerability: 3, Confidence: High, Reviewers: Decided in Workshop (W) Understudied rare taxa: NA Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Habitats Assigned to American Oystercatcher: Formation Name Cliff & Rock Macrogroup Name Rocky Coast Formation Name Intertidal Macrogroup Name Intertidal
    [Show full text]
  • Black Oystercatcher
    Alaska Species Ranking System - Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Class: Aves Order: Charadriiformes Haematopus bachmani Review Status: Peer-reviewed Version Date: 08 April 2019 Conservation Status NatureServe: Agency: G Rank:G5 ADF&G: Species of Greatest Conservation Need IUCN: Audubon AK: S Rank: S2S3B,S2 USFWS: Bird of Conservation Concern BLM: Final Rank Conservation category: V. Orange unknown status and either high biological vulnerability or high action need Category Range Score Status -20 to 20 0 Biological -50 to 50 11 Action -40 to 40 -4 Higher numerical scores denote greater concern Status - variables measure the trend in a taxon’s population status or distribution. Higher status scores denote taxa with known declining trends. Status scores range from -20 (increasing) to 20 (decreasing). Score Population Trend in Alaska (-10 to 10) 0 Suspected stable (ASG 2019; Cushing et al. 2018), but data are limited and do not encompass this species' entire range. We therefore rank this question as Unknown. Distribution Trend in Alaska (-10 to 10) 0 Unknown. Habitat is dynamic and subject to change as a result of geomorphic and glacial processes. For example, numbers expanded on Middleton Island after the 1964 earthquake (Gill et al. 2004). Status Total: 0 Biological - variables measure aspects of a taxon’s distribution, abundance and life history. Higher biological scores suggest greater vulnerability to extirpation. Biological scores range from -50 (least vulnerable) to 50 (most vulnerable). Score Population Size in Alaska (-10 to 10) -2 Uncertain. The global population is estimated at 11,000 individuals, of which 45%-70% breed in Alaska (ASG 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 General Introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds
    CHAPTER 1 General introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds, sometimes referred to as waders, are birds that rely on coastal beaches, shorelines, estuaries and mudflats, or inland lakes, lagoons and the like for part of, and in some cases all of, their daily and annual requirements, i.e. food and shelter, breeding habitat. They are of the suborder Charadrii and include the curlews, snipe, plovers, sandpipers, stilts, oystercatchers and a number of other species, making up a diverse group of birds. Within Australia, shorebirds account for 10% of all bird species (Lane 1987) and in New South Wales (NSW), this figure increases marginally to 11% (Smith 1991). Of these shorebirds, 45% rely exclusively on coastal habitat (Smith 1991). The majority, however, are either migratory or vagrant species, leaving only five resident species that will permanently inhabit coastal shorelines/beaches within Australia. Australian resident shorebirds include the Beach Stone-curlew (Esacus neglectus), Hooded Plover (Charadrius rubricollis), Red- capped Plover (Charadrius ruficapillus), Australian Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) and Sooty Oystercatcher (Haematopus fuliginosus) (Smith 1991, Priest et al. 2002). These species are generally classified as ‘beach-nesting’, nesting on sandy ocean beaches, sand spits and sand islands within estuaries. However, the Sooty Oystercatcher is an island-nesting species, using rocky shores of near- and offshore islands rather than sandy beaches. The plovers may also nest by inland salt lakes. Shorebirds around the globe have become increasingly threatened with the pressure of predation, competition, human encroachment and disturbance and global warming. Populations of birds breeding in coastal areas which also support a burgeoning human population are under the highest threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds 22: 9-19
    Scottish Birds THE JOURNAL OF THE SOC Vol 22 No 1 June 2001 Roof and ground nesting Eurasian Oystercatchers in Aberdeen The contrasting status of Ring Ouzels in 2 areas of upper Deeside The distribution of Crested Tits in Scotland during the 1990s Western Capercaillie captures in snares Amendments to the Scottish List Scottish List: species and subspecies Breeding biology of Ring Ouzels in Glen Esk Scottish Birds The Journal of the Scottish Ornithologists' Club Editor: Dr S da Prato Assisted by: Dr I Bainbridge, Professor D Jenkins, Dr M Marquiss, Dr J B Nelson, and R Swann Business Editor: The Secretary sac, 21 Regent Terrace Edinburgh EH7 5BT (tel 0131-5566042, fax 0131 5589947, email [email protected]). Scottish Birds, the official journal of the Scottish Ornithologists' Club, publishes original material relating to ornithology in Scotland. Papers and notes should be sent to The Editor, Scottish Birds, 21 Regent Terrace, Edinburgh EH7 SBT. Two issues of Scottish Birds are published each year, in June and in December. Scottish Birds is issued free to members of the Scottish Ornithologists' Club, who also receive the quarterly newsletter Scottish Bird News, the annual Scottish Bird Report and the annual Raplor round up. These are available to Institutions at a subscription rate (1997) of £36. The Scottish Ornithologists' Club was formed in 1936 to encourage all aspects of ornithology in Scotland. It has local branches which meet in Aberdeen, Ayr, the Borders, Dumfries, Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Inverness, New Galloway, Orkney, St Andrews, Stirling, Stranraer and Thurso, each with its own programme of field meetings and winter lectures.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    BlackOystercatcher — BirdsofNorthAmericaOnline Page1of2 From the CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY and the AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS'UNION. species or keywords Search Home Species Subscribe News & Info FAQ Already a subscriber? Sign in Don'thave a subscription? Subscribe Now Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani Order CHARADRIIFORMES –Family HAEMATOPODIDAE Issue No.155 Authors:Andres, Brad A.,and Gary A.Falxa • Articles • Multimedia • References Articles Introduction Welcome to the Birds of North America Online! Welcome to BNA Online, the leading source of life history information for North American breeding birds.This free, Distinguishing Characteristics courtesy preview is just the first of 14articles that provide detailed life history information including Distribution, Migration, Distribution Habitat, Food Habits, Sounds, Behavior and Breeding.Written by acknowledged experts on each species, there is also a comprehensive bibliography of published research on the species. Systematics Migration A subscription is needed to access the remaining articles for this and any other species.Subscription rates start as low as $5USD for 30days of complete access to the resource.To subscribe, please visit the Cornell Lab of Ornithology E-Store. Habitat Food Habits If you are already a current subscriber, you will need to sign in with your login information to access BNA normally. Sounds Subscriptions are available for as little as $5for 30days of full access!If you would like to subscribe to BNA Online, just Behavior visit the Cornell Lab of Ornithology E-Store. Breeding Introduction Demography and Populations Conservation and Management Appearance Measurements Priorities for Future Research Acknowledgments About the Author(s) Black Oystercatcher in flight, Pt.Pinos, Monterey, California, 18February 2007. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/155/articles/introduction 11/14/2015 BlackOystercatcher — BirdsofNorthAmericaOnline Page2of2 Fig.1.Distribution of the Black Oystercatcher.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic Facilitation by the Oystercatcher Haematopus Palliatus Temminick on the Scavenger Snail Buccinanops Globulosum Kiener in a Patagonian Bay
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 325 (2005) 27–34 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Trophic facilitation by the oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Temminick on the scavenger snail Buccinanops globulosum Kiener in a Patagonian bay Pedro Daleoa,b,*, Mauricio Escapab,c, Juan Pablo Isaccha,b, Pablo Ribeiroa,b, Oscar Iribarnea,b aDepartamento de Biologı´a (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina bConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas y Te´cnicas (CONICET), Argentina cInstituto Argentino de Oceanografı´a (IADO), Argentina Received 25 August 2004; received in revised form 4 April 2005; accepted 7 April 2005 Abstract This study investigated the role of the American oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) as a resource subsidizer for the scavenger snail Buccinanops globulosum in a northern Patagonian bay (40845VS, 64856VW, San Antonio Bay, Argentina). The most frequent food item for the snails was dead crabs Cyrtograpsus angulatus Dana, and the snails preferred this item. In the field, most dead crabs (78%) resulted from oystercatcher predation. Field densities of dead crabs were within the 95% confidence limits of the estimated densities produced by oystercatcher foraging activity, suggesting that a large proportion of carrion available for snails is a byproduct of oystercatcher predation. Dead crabs with injuries were more rapidly detected and consumed by snails, probably because injuries produced by oystercatchers increase leakage of body fluids and facilitate penetration of the proboscis of the snails. Our results suggest that oystercatcher predation subsidize this scavenger snail by increasing availability of food, decreasing variability in their provision and facilitating their consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]
  • Black Oystercatcher Foraging ­ Hollenberg and Demers 35
    Black Oystercatcher foraging ­ Hollenberg and Demers 35 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) foraging on varnish clams (Nuttallia obscurata) in Nanaimo, British Columbia Emily J. R. Hollenberg 1 and Eric Demers 2 1 406­3905 Quadra St., Victoria, B.C., V8X 1J1; email: [email protected] 2 Corresponding author: Biology Department, Vancouver Island University, 900 Fifth St., Nanaimo, B.C., V9R 5S5; email: [email protected] Abstract: In this study, we investigated whether Black Oystercatchers (Haematopus bachmani) feed on the recently intro­ duced varnish clam (Nuttallia obscurata), and whether they selectively feed on specific size classes of varnish clams. Sur­ veys were conducted at Piper’s Lagoon and Departure Bay in Nanaimo, British Columbia, between October 2013 and February 2014. Foraging oystercatchers were observed, and the number and size of varnish clams consumed were recor­ ded. We also determined the density and size of varnish clams available at both sites using quadrats. Our results indicate that Black Oystercatchers consumed varnish clams at both sites, although feeding rates differed slightly between sites. We also found that oystercatchers consumed almost the full range of available clam sizes, with little evidence for size­selective foraging. We conclude that Black Oystercatchers can successfully exploit varnish clams and may obtain a significant part of their daily energy requirements from this non­native species. Key Words: Black Oystercatcher, Haematopus bachmani, varnish clam, Nuttallia obscurata, foraging, Nanaimo. Hollenberg, E.J.R. and E. Demers. 2017. Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) foraging on varnish clams (Nuttallia obscurata) in Nanaimo, British Columbia. British Columbia Birds 27:35–41. Campbell et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan for the Conservation of the American Oystercatcher
    Business Plan for the Conservation of the American Oystercatcher A 10-Year Plan to Secure a Coastal Keystone Species American Oystercatcher Working Group National Fish and Wildlife Foundation October 26, 2008 i WHAT IS A BUSINESS PLAN? A business plan serves two broad, primary functions. First, it provides specific information to those (e.g., prospective investors) not familiar with the proposed or existing business, including its goals and the management strategy and financial and other resources necessary to attain those goals. For outside individuals, it is imperative that the business plan offer a clear rationale for why the goals represent a good investment and why the strategy for achieving those goals is the best one possible. Second, a business plan provides internal guidance to those who are active in the operation of the business, allowing all individuals to understand where the business is headed and the means by which it will get there. The plan helps keep the business from drifting away from its goals and key actions through careful articulation of a strategy. In the context of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s conservation efforts, business plans represent the strategies necessary to meet the goals of Keystone and other initiatives. At its core, each business plan emphasizes the type(s) and magnitude of the impacts (benefits) that will be realized through the initiative, the monetary costs involved, and the potential obstacles (risks) to achieving those gains. Readers of the business plan must be able to see the strength of the relationship between the activities identified within the strategy and the anticipated outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN Black OYSTERCATCHER
    1 1 2 2 3 3 4 African Black Oystercatcher 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 Between 8 9 9 10 10 11 the tides 11 12 Text by Phil Hockey 12 13 13 14 he African Black Oystercatcher’s 14 15 15 first entry into the scientific ‘led- 16 16 17 ger’ happened only 141 years 17 18 T 18 19 ago, when a specimen collected at the 19 20 Cape of Good Hope was described by 20 21 21 22 Bonaparte. Bonaparte named the bird 22 23 moquini after the French botanist, 23 24 24 25 Horace Benedict Alfred Moquin Tandon, 25 26 director of the Toulouse Botanical 26 27 27 28 Gardens. Its first entry into the litera- 28 29 29 ture, however, predates this by more 30 30 31 than 200 years. 31 32 32 33 In 1648, Étienne de Flacourt, the 33 34 Governor-General of Madagascar, 34 35 35 36 visited Saldanha Bay. He wrote: ‘There 36 37 are birds like blackbirds, with a very shrill 37 38 38 39 and clear cry, as large as partridges, with 39 40 40 a long sharp beak and red legs: they are 41 41 42 very good to eat and when young they 42 43 43 44 taste like Woodcock’. The first descrip- 44 45 tions of the bird’s biology date from the 45 46 46 47 late 19th century – much of what was 47 48 written then was culled from knowledge 48 49 49 50 of the European Oystercatcher, and much 50 51 51 of it was wrong! 52 52 53 Now, at the end of the 20th century, it 53 54 54 55 seems as though this striking bird may 55 56 be moving from a confused past into an 56 57 57 58 uncertain future.
    [Show full text]