COVID-19: Guidance for Multifamily Residential Buildings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa
MAKING A RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE TERRACED HOUSES DEVELOPMENT Wan Rahmah Mohd Zaki Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdul Hadi Nawawi Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Sabarinah Sh Ahmad Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The main feature of a conventional terraced housing development is rows of rectangular shaped houses with the narrow facade as the frontage. Consequently, this limits natural cross ventilation and daylight penetration into the middle of the houses; and cause for unnecessary energy consumption on mechanical cooling and artijicial lighting to make the living spaces comfortable for occupants. Such inconsideration is mainly attributed to the optimum configuration of houses which offers the most economic return desired by the developer. Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies can make terraced houses more conducive for occupants as well as gives reasonable returns to the developer. The idea is demonstrated on a hypothetical double storeys terraced scheme in a 2.5 acre site whereby it is transformed intofour types of PA terraced houses development. The Return on Invesfment of the PA terraced houses is ascertained for two situations, ie., (i) fwed sales price for all types of house; and (ii) added premium to PA terraced houses due to the positive unintended effects such as low density housing, etc. If critical criteria for demand and supply in housing remain constant, it is found that PA terraced housing development offers competitive returns to the developer relative to the returns for conventional terraced housing scheme. Keyworh: Orientation, Indoor Comfort and Operational Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Housing and Energy The recent public awareness on sustainability calls for housing to not only serves as a basic shelter but also to be energy efficient, i.e., designed to make occupants need low operational energy. -
Midvale City Council Meeting Agenda April 6, 2021
7505 South Holden Street Midvale, UT 84047 (801) 567-7200 www.midvalecity.org MIDVALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA APRIL 6, 2021 PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Midvale City Council will hold a meeting on the 6th day of April 2021 as follows: Electronic & In-Person City Council Meeting This meeting will be held electronically and in-person. Those choosing to attend the meeting in person will be required to wear a face mask (covering their mouth and nose) and practice social distancing. The City seeks to provide safe options for the public to participate in-person and electronically that comply with state and local regulations, as well as common sense. The meeting will be broadcast on the following: You Tube: www.MidvaleCity.org/YouTube If you would like to provide public comments electronically, please email your comments to [email protected] prior to the completion of the public comments portion of the meeting. You may also submit comments if the Mayor and City Council open a specific agenda item to public comment. These comments will be read aloud in the meeting and will be part of the public record. When commenting, please: • Limit your comments to 400 words (the equivalent of 3 minutes) • Include your first and last name • Include your city of residence (optional) • Include the name of the Agenda item 6:00 PM – WORKSHOP • Discuss Residential Planned Unit Developments [Alex Murphy, Planning Director] • Discuss FY 2022 Budget [Kyle Maurer, Administrative Services Director] 7:00 PM - REGULAR MEETING I. GENERAL BUSINESS A. WELCOME AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. -
Community Profile November 2017
COMMUNITY PROFILE NOVEMBER 2017 Acknowledgements Coming soon..... Table of Contents 1. Introduction..............................................1 2. The People of the Alisal..........................7 3. Land Use and Housing.........................15 4. Community Character.........................25 5. Quality of Life........................................51 6. Health......................................................57 7. Economic Development.......................71 8. Infrastructure and Mobility.................81 This page was intentionally left blank. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION chapter one INTRODUCTION ALISAL VIBRANCY PLAN: COMMUNITY PROFILE 1 The Alisal Vibrancy Plan Plan Overview City was drafting its Downtown Vibrancy Plan What We Want to and Economic Development Element in 2013. The Alisal community and the City of Salinas are Through relationship building and partnerships Achieve undertaking an exciting planning process. Since with residents, other community groups, City 2013, residents and community organizers have staff, and elected officials, City Council allocated • Create a road map to a healthy and advocated for a community-driven plan to ensure the initial funding for a plan for the Alisal. environmentally sustainable Salinas for all residents a bright future for East Salinas. Through the Plan, the Alisal community will generate their vision for a thriving, safe, and • Confirm the community’s vision for the The Alisal is an eastern neighborhood in the future City of Salinas, generally bounded by Highway sustainable future, and strategies for getting 101 to the southwest, Madeira Avenue and St there. • Commit additional resources in areas of historic disinvestment that are in alignment Augustine Drive to the northwest, E Alisal Street Community participation and empowerment to the southeast, and Freedom Parkway to the with the community’s goals to ensure social are critical to ensure the Plan is responsive to equity northeast. -
Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C
1 Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C. 2 3 Jonathan Rogers 4 Corresponding Author 5 District Department of Transportation 6 55 M Street SE 7 Washington, DC 20003 8 Tel: 202-671-3022; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 9 10 Dan Emerine 11 D.C. Office of Planning 12 1100 4th Street SW, Suite E560 13 Washington, DC 20024 14 Tel: 202-442-8812; Fax: 202-442-7638 ; Email: [email protected] 15 16 Peter Haas 17 Center for Neighborhood Technology 18 2125 W. North Ave. 19 Chicago, Il 60647 20 Tel.: 773-269-4034; Fax: 773-278-3840; Email: [email protected] 21 22 David Jackson 23 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 24 4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 800 25 Bethesda, MD 20901 26 Tel: 301-347-9108; Fax: 301-347-0101; Email: [email protected] 27 28 Peter Kauffmann 29 Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. 30 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 600 31 Washington, DC 20036 32 Tel: 202-296-8625; Fax: 202-785-1276; Email: [email protected] 33 34 Rick Rybeck 35 Just Economics, LLC 36 1669 Columbia Rd., NW, Suite 116 37 Washington, DC 20009 38 Tel: 202-439-4176; Fax: 202-265-1288; Email: [email protected] 39 40 Ryan Westrom 41 District Department of Transportation 42 55 M Street SE 43 Washington, DC 20003 44 Tel: 202-671-2041; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 45 46 Word count: 5,468 words text + 8 tables/figures x 250 words (each) = 7,468 words 1 Submission Date: November 13, 2015 1 ABSTRACT 2 The District Department of Transportation and the District of Columbia Office of Planning 3 recently led a research effort to understand how parking utilization in multi-family residential 4 buildings is related to neighborhood and building characteristics. -
Building for Everyone: a Universal Design Approach Entrances and Horizontal Circulation 2 Centre for Excellence in Universal Design
Building for Everyone: A Universal Design Approach Entrances and horizontal circulation 2 Centre for Excellence in Universal Design Creating an environment that can be used by all people, regardless of their age, size, disability or ability. The National Disability Authority’s Centre for Excellence in Universal Design has a statutory role to promote the achievement of excellence in universal design in: • the design of the built and external environment • product/service design • information and communications technologies (ICT) • the development and promotion of standards • education and professional development • raising awareness of universal design More information and updates on the website at: www.universaldesign.ie II Building for Everyone Booklet 2 - Entrances and horizontal circulation The other booklets from the Building for Everyone series: Booklet 1 - External environment and approach Booklet 3 - Vertical circulation Booklet 4 - Internal environment and services Booklet 5 - Sanitary facilities Booklet 6 - Facilities in buildings Booklet 7 - Building types Booklet 8 - Building management Booklet 9 - Planning and policy Booklet 10 - Index and terminology I Contents 2.0 Objectives 4 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Terminology 8 2.3 Design Issues 9 2.3.1 Appearance and function 9 2.3.2 To let people in or to keep people out? 10 2.4 Entrances 11 2.4.1 Entrance lobbies 14 2.4.2 Reception and waiting areas 19 2.4.3 Queuing areas and temporary barriers 27 2.5 Horizontal circulation 29 2.5.1 Corridors 31 2.5.2 Internal lobbies 35 2.6 Doors 36 -
Building a Safe Room Inside Your House COURTESY of NOAA/NSSL Includes Construction Plans and Cost Estimates
FEMA 320 FIRST EDITION October 1998 COURTESY OF NASA COURTESY Taking Shelter From the Storm: Building a Safe Room Inside Your House COURTESY OF NOAA/NSSL Includes Construction Plans and Cost Estimates Federal Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Directorate 500 C Street, SW. • Washington, DC 20472 www.fema.gov Acknowledgments This booklet and the construction drawings it contains would not have been possible without the pioneering work of the Wind Engineering Research Center at Texas Tech University, the diligent efforts of the design team, and the constructive suggestions of the reviewers. Design Team Reviewers Paul Tertell, P.E. Dennis Lee Project Officer Hurricane Program Manager Program Policy and Assessment Branch Mitigation Division Mitigation Directorate FEMA Region VI FEMA Denton, Texas Washington, DC Bill Massey Clifford Oliver, CEM Hurricane Program Manager Chief, Program Policy and Assessment Branch Mitigation Division Mitigation Directorate FEMA Region IV FEMA Atlanta, Georgia Washington, DC TIm Sheckler, P.E. Dr. Ernst Kiesling, P.E. Civil Engineer Professor of Civil Engineering National Earthquake Program Office Wind Engineering Research Center Mitigation Directorate Texas Tech University FEMA Lubbock, Texas Washington, DC Dr. Kishor Mehta, P.E. Dr. Richard Peterson Director, Wind Engineering Research Center Chairman, Department of Geosciences Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas Lubbock, Texas Russell Carter, E.I.T. Larry Tanner, P.E., R.A. Research Associate Research Associate Wind Engineering Research Center Wind Engineering Research Center Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas Lubbock, Texas William Coulbourne, P.E. Richard Vognild, P.E Structural Engineer Director, Technical Services Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc. Southern Building Code Congress International Greenbelt, Maryland Birmingham, Alabama Jay Crandell, P.E. -
Capacity Chart
Capacity Chart DIMENSIONS BANQUET ROOM FT MT FT² MT² THEATER CLASSROOM CONFERENCE U-SHAPE HOLLOW SQ BANQUET DANCE RECEPTION Crystal Ballroom 80 x 111 x 15 22 x 34 x 5 7,577 704 850 375 80 - 64 560 450 600 Crystal Foyer 48 x 56 x 12 15 x 17 x 4 3,124 290 200 100 60 60 64 100 - 450 Crystal Garden 75 x 37 23 x 11 2,775 258 500 - - - - 150 - 250 Rodeo Ballroom 54 x 96 x 10.6 16 x 29 x 3 5,213 484 420 225 80 - 50 360 300 250 Rodeo Foyer 88 x 18 27 x 5 1,925 179 - - - - - 380 - 250 Rodeo Center 54 x 44 x 10.6 16 x 13 x 3 2,376 221 200 120 60 50 64 160 120 200 Rodeo West 54 x 26 x 10.6 16 x 13 x 3 1,404 130 110 90 40 42 50 80 70 110 Rodeo East 54 x 26 x 10.6 16 x 8 x 3 1,404 130 110 90 40 42 50 80 70 110 Sunset Ballroom 87 x 47 x 36 27 x 14 x 11 2,345 218 175 100 50 50 60 150 120 220 Sunset Foyer 36 x 24 11 x 7 900 84 60 30 16 27 30 40 - 100 Polo Garden 36 x 57 11 x 17 2,052 191 180 - - - - - - 180 Polo Private Room 30 x 43 x 10.5 9 x 13 x 3 1,040 97 80 48 30 36 40 80 60 100 Polo Private Salon 12 x 19 4 x 6 228 21 - - 12 - - - - - Boardroom 30 x 17 9 x 5 512 48 - - 12 - - - - - 30,067 2,795 Aerial View N G LE N WA Y Bungalows G L E N W A Y N C R E S Loading C Polo Dock E Lounge N H T A R D T R F O I V R E D W A Y N Crystal B E Ballroom V Crescent E R Wing L Y Cabana D B R N E Cafe I N Bar V E C E Main D A Nineteen12 I Entrance M C Pool T D C E A N N Y O D N R D I R V I V E E VARD ET BOULE SUNSET BOULEVARD SUNS ARD S BOULEV UNSET BOULEVARD SUNSET R R O O D D E E O O D D R R I V I V E Will Rogers N E Memorial Park B E N V C E A R N L Y Y O N D -
Sharing a House but Not a Household: Extended Families and Exclusionary Zoning Forty Years After Moore
SHARING A HOUSE BUT NOT A HOUSEHOLD: EXTENDED FAMILIES AND EXCLUSIONARY ZONING FORTY YEARS AFTER MOORE Solangel Maldonado* INTRODUCTION Moore v. City of East Cleveland1 is undeniably a victory for extended families that do not conform to the nuclear family form because the state can no longer prevent them from living together in one household. In particular, it is a victory for families of color, immigrants, and economically vulnerable families who are more likely to reside with extended family members for cultural and economic reasons. Justice Lewis Powell, writing for the plurality, recognized the American tradition of extended family members living in one household,2 and Justice William Brennan (joined by Justice Thurgood Marshall) further noted that the extended family “remains not merely still a pervasive living pattern, but under the goad of brutal economic necessity, a prominent pattern—virtually a means of survival— for large numbers of the poor and deprived minorities of our society.”3 Like most decisions, however, Moore is not without its critics. As my students point out each year, the Court’s distinction between the City of East Cleveland’s narrow definition of a family and ordinances that allow anyone who is related by blood, marriage, or adoption to live together in a single-family household4 suggests that the Moore Court would exclude de facto parents, cohabiting partners, or close friends sharing a home from its definition of family. A definition of family that requires blood, marriage, or adoption is unnecessarily narrow and is not consistent with modern conceptions of family. * Professor of Law, Seton Hall University School of Law. -
Indoor Air Quality Guidelines for Multifamily Building Upgrades
Publication No. EPA 402/K-16-/01 January 2016 Preface How to protect public health, save energy and reduce climate change impacts — all at the same time These Energy Savings Plus Health: Indoor Air Quality Guidelines for Multifamily Building Upgrades are part of EPA’s approach to addressing three of our most pressing environmental and public health priorities: reducing asthma and other health disparities, our reliance on fossil fuels, and climate change impacts. These guidelines will be a valuable tool in helping to ensure the health, comfort and safety of the many Americans living in multifamily buildings. More than 80 million Americans, about 25 percent of the U.S. population, live in multi-unit homes. About one-quarter of these residents live below the poverty line and a large percentage of residents of affordable housing are children, the elderly or disabled. These groups are the most vulnerable, and they are disproportionately impacted by diseases like asthma and commonly exposed to serious health risks from secondhand tobacco smoke, usually at home. Heating and cooling buildings uses a lot of energy — about 43 percent of all energy use in the United States! Producing this energy requires us to burn fossil fuels like coal and oil, which contributes to air pollution and generates large amounts of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change. Improving the energy efficiency of buildings usually involves tightening the buildings through air sealing and other weatherization techniques to reduce the escape of air that we have just spent money to heat or cool. That’s a very good thing. -
Craguns Resort Map.Pdf
GULL LAKE . Steamboat Bay Irma’s Kitchen Dock Parking Grassy Knoll Lake Deck Lake Lake Access North Beach Lake Lake Access Wedding Site Access Access Access Lake Cabana Café Restaurant Access Hilltops Lounge Market 343-345 Lakeview Cabins Hospitality Bayview Villas Lake 684 Room 340 685 686 687 688 Access 689 Photo Opportunity Welcome to Cabin 115 resort on gull lake 1-800-CRAGUNS (1-800-272-4867) . LOCAL: 218-825-2700 . www.craguns.com DINING LAUNDRY FACILITIES MEETING ROOMS u u Lakeside Dining Room Poolside, by Room 230 u Lakeshore (Brown Signs) u Tech Center (Yellow Signs) Located at the Legacy Maps not to scale. Updated 10/17 68-2992 u Cabana Café u Shoreline Suites, One level below dining room One level below 200-211 Courses at Cragun’s: u by Room 280 u Tech 1: By Room 162, Irma’s Kitchen (Seasonal) Paul Bunyan (Blue Signs) u Audubon Room u u By Cabin 651, North of through Door E Bear Trap Lounge One level below indoor pool u Pavilion u Outdoor Pool (Summer Only) u Tech 2: Under Rooms 204-207, Legacy Grille (Seasonal) Pioneer (Black Signs) u Legacy Grille Halfway down dining room through Door D POP MACHINES Turn left at Cragun’s entrance FIREWOOD stairs, on right Tech 3: Under Rooms 200-203, u Lobby through Door C or B onto CR 77 toward Brainerd. Please call Ext. 8700 for u Dutch (Black Signs) u Drive approximately one mile Marina u Shoreline Meeting Room delivery and instructions. Halfway down dining room and turn left onto u The Centre At base of Shoreline Suite stairs, on left, OR halfway down CR 70. -
First Floor: Residential Lobby & Hotel Amenities
RESIDENT GARAGE RAMP ENTRY TRANSFORMERS EXIT LOADING BAY 1 LOADING BAY 2 TRASH FIRE MAIN ELECTRICAL COMMAND ROOM CONTROL PACKAGE SERVICE CENTER ELEVATOR CONCIERGE RESIDENTIAL SECURITY LOBBY PRIVATE DINING DECK SERVICE VESTIBULE KITCHEN MAIL ROOM PRIVATE DINING RESIDENT SERVICE HOTEL ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR T K RESIDENT RESIDENT SERVICE ELEVATOR ELEVATOR REE STATION HOTEL HOTEL LOBBY LOBBY C RESIDENT ELEVATOR ELEVATOR STREE LOBBY ELEVATOR S E C JANITOR SHOAL HOTEL RESTAURANT NUE RESTAURANT RESTROOMS CLOSET ELEVATOR DECK RESIDENT ELEVATOR BAR MGMNT DR OF RM COFFEE OFFICE OFFICE SHOP LUGGAGE STORAGE SUNKEN BAR LOUNGE HOTEL LOBBY HOTEL RECEPTION HOTEL ENTRANCE 2ND STREET FIRST FLOOR: RESIDENTIAL LOBBY & HOTEL AMENITIES SALES GALLERY & MODEL 208 COLORADO ST. AUSTIN, TX 78701 512.384.1387 LIVEAUSTINPROPER.COM Floor plans shown are not to any particular scale and are subject to change. All dimensions shown hereon are approximate and may vary from the description and definition of the unit as set forth in the purchase contract or the condominium documents. Please review the condominium documents for a description of how the units are measured. Room layouts and the location of appliances are subject to change. OFFICE UNIFORMS LOCKERS OFFICE KITCHEN STORAGE BANQUET STORAGE LAUNDRY LOCKERS BALLROOM STORAGE HOUSEKEEPING SERVICE ELEVATOR TRASH SERVICE ELEVATOR LOBBY RESIDENT SERVICE ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR WOMEN’S HOTEL RESIDENT ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR RESIDENT LOBBY LOBBY ELEVATOR ELEVATOR RESIDENT ELEVATOR MEN’S BALLROOM AV EQUIP FOYER 1 MEETING ROOM 2 FOYER 2 STORAGE TERRACE PRE-FUNCTION KITCHENETTE BAR MEETING ROOM 1 TERRACE LEVEL 2: BALLROOM AND MEETING ROOMS SALES GALLERY & MODEL 208 COLORADO ST. AUSTIN, TX 78701 512.384.1387 LIVEAUSTINPROPER.COM Floor plans shown are not to any particular scale and are subject to change. -
Building Numbers, Street Addresses, Room Numbers
www.facilities.ufl.edu BUSINESS AFFAIRS PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PDC PROJECT MANAGEMENT GUIDE PMG-E14: BUILDING NUMBERS, STREET ADDRESSES, AND ROOM NUMBERS PURPOSE: To communicate guidelines and procedures for numbering facilities, establishing street addresses, and assigning space/room numbers. A. Introduction Planning Design and Construction (PDC) is responsible for numbering, tracking, and reporting facilities-related information for the University. PDC utilizes CAD/BIM technology in the data-basing of facilities information, so a meaningful numbering and CAD/BIM standard must be followed. Additionally, PDC is required to annually submit the Physical Facilities Space File to the Board of Governors and must take necessary actions to ensure the incorporation of required data elements into its operating database. Data elements are based on the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual, 2006. B. Street Addresses A request for a street address should be made by the PDC Project Manager (PM) once a project’s physical locale has been established and before site work begins. At a minimum, the building footprint and major entry doors should be settled to establish an appropriate address. Requests for a new address will be coordinated through PDC Space Management & Analysis (SMA) staff. Upon assignment of the street address, the new address will be entered in UF-STARS for local notification to PeopleSoft, Purchasing, EH&S, and the UF community. The Alachua County E911 office will be responsible for notification to the Alachua County Call Center, USPS, major package carriers, and other external entities. New addresses outside of Alachua County should be requested by the PDC PM through PDC SMA, which will work with the appropriate local authorities.