DOCSLIB.ORG

ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa MAKING A RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE TERRACED HOUSES DEVELOPMENT Wan Rahmah Mohd Zaki Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdul Hadi Nawawi Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Sabarinah Sh Ahmad Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The main feature of a conventional terraced housing development is rows of rectangular shaped houses with the narrow facade as the frontage. Consequently, this limits natural cross ventilation and daylight penetration into the middle of the houses; and cause for unnecessary energy consumption on mechanical cooling and artijicial lighting to make the living spaces comfortable for occupants. Such inconsideration is mainly attributed to the optimum configuration of houses which offers the most economic return desired by the developer. Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies can make terraced houses more conducive for occupants as well as gives reasonable returns to the developer. The idea is demonstrated on a hypothetical double storeys terraced scheme in a 2.5 acre site whereby it is transformed intofour types of PA terraced houses development. The Return on Invesfment of the PA terraced houses is ascertained for two situations, ie., (i) fwed sales price for all types of house; and (ii) added premium to PA terraced houses due to the positive unintended effects such as low density housing, etc. If critical criteria for demand and supply in housing remain constant, it is found that PA terraced housing development offers competitive returns to the developer relative to the returns for conventional terraced housing scheme. Keyworh: Orientation, Indoor Comfort and Operational Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Housing and Energy The recent public awareness on sustainability calls for housing to not only serves as a basic shelter but also to be energy efficient, i.e., designed to make occupants need low operational energy. Such requirement is an important design consideration because the cost of energy has been increasing and will continue to increase throughout the building's life time. In so far built environment is concerned, operational energy requirement for a house can be low if the house is designed to make occupants feel thermally and visually comfortable, naturally. 1.2 Objective of Paper This paper propagates a change in the conventional terraced houses design to emulate Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies so that the houses can be naturally comfortable for occupants that they rely less on commercially supplied energy. Based on that notion, this paper intends to demonstrate that PA terraced housing scheme is capable of offering competitive Return on Investment 01) to the developer when compared to conventional terrace housing that rarely addresses energy issue. 2.0 COMFORTABLE INDOOR CONDITIONS 2.1 Thermal Comfort There are two components of variables that influence thermal comfort. Firstly, the microclimate, namely: air temperature, radiant temperature, humidity and air speed. These are fixed variables and should be considered in the building design. The second component is highly subjective as it relates to occupant's personal (activity level, clothing), biological (age, gender), environmental (opedclose window) adaptability as well as expectation on thermal comfort (Aulicierns and Szokolay, 1997). Whilst thermal comfort can be generalized by the first set of fixed variables, people's perception of comfort is unique. Nonetheless, there have been many studies on thermal comfort values for people in the hot and humid tropics. Sh. Ahmad (2004) in her study of thermal comfort and energy performance of urban multi storey residential buildings in Malaysia reaffirmed the local thermal comfort is within 2.5K from 26.1°C. La Roche (2001) advised the largest single source of thermal gain for building in the tropical climate is by solar radiation. Hence, it is wise to aim to reduce heat gain from the sun by minimizing the amount of solar radiation that falls on to the building envelope. 2.2 Vical Comfort Meanwhile, natural visual comfort occurs when occupant feels comfortable doing specific task without the need of artificial lighting, but only using daylight. However, the quality of daylight entering a space depends on both internal and external factors, simultaneously. Whilst external factors relate to the sky and the ground covers; the internal factors are within the scope of built environment. For instance, the size, type and position of the openings; the depth and shape of the rooms; and the colours of the internal surfaces are main internal factors which affect daylight in a room (Majoros, 1998). 3.0 PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE Passive Architecture (PA) describes a building that is designed with climate factors in mind to provide comfortable indoor conditions, naturally. The aim is to make building occupant need less of operational energy. In hot and humid tropics like Malaysia, PA design strategies mainly aim to avoid heat from the sun, promote breeze f~omthe prevailing wind and ensure daylight into the building (Hyde, 2000). The above-described idea is not new. Local Malay traditional houses have large overhangs on the east and west sides to alleviate heat gain. There are also air outlets at ceiling level to allow lnternotiono~.~?n~posiumbl 5cvclopin.g Economies: Ci~tllrnorrillitics~?n~c~~~{)Di~srrities ~~... hot air to escape. Coupled with raised floor and double volume roof, such traditional houses provide indoor comfortable conditions, naturally (Figure 1). Figure 1: 'Climate Design of a Malay House' by Ghazali, M. (2007) Abroad, others had documented the same 'thought since 1960s. Then, it was believed that a building designed with climate in mind, instead of against it would make occupants healthy (Olgyay, 1960). Subsequently, this approach was experimented and realised by other researchers such as Hyde (2000) as being a commonsensical act towards sustainability due to its direct relationship with energy conservation. 3.2 Terminology Various terminologies were used to describe buildings that are designed with climate and it is notably expressed as 'passive' to portray a 'defensive' or 'protective' attitude against climate (Table 1). Regardless the terminologies, their aims remain the same - to promote building independence from commercially supplied energy. In this paper, the term PA is applied to reflect the endeavour as being a basic responsibility of architects. Table 1: Terrainologies for Climatically Designed Buildings Terminology 1 ~uthor,year Bioclmatic Design Olgyay, 1963 CIimatic Responsive Design Hyde, 2000 Climate Sensitive Design Emmanuel, 2005 Green Building Buchanan, 2005 Passive Solar Design ~ain-bedet al., 2002 Passive House Rohracher, 2005 Passive System Design Szokolay, 2006 564IPage 4.0 TERRACED HOUSES 4.1 Local Residential Market A report by National Property Information Centre (NAPIC) in 2008 stated that the bullc of housing developments offered in the local residential market are 2 to 3 storeys terraced houses. In the third quarter of 2008, from the total 4,158,232 units of housing completed, 876,948 units were terraced houses, i.e. about 21% of the local residential properties market. A physical survey at the Malaysia Property Exhibition (MAPEX) 2008 supports this fact whereby fiom 85 residential developments offered at that time, terraced houses formed the largest type of property on offered (Figure 2) (Mohd Zaki, et al., 2008). SmsTitie Residences Sem-Detached Houses Figure 2: Four Types of 85 ResidentiaI Developments Offered at MAPEX 2008 As such, making terraced houses to be less dependent on commercially supplied energy will have a significant impact in lowering the domestic energy demand at national level. 4.2 Typical Terraced House Floor Layout A typical two storeys terraced house has a frontage measuring 18 to 22 feet (ft)' wide with depth varies from 40 to 70 feet. A close look at these typical terraced houses and the housing layouts reveal that there are two design issues that would result for uncomfortable indoor conditions and the subsequent use of operational energy to make the spaces falls into the acceptable comfort range. 4.2.1 Deep Floor Plan Firstly, a typical two storeys terraced house has deep floor plan which centre has no access to external opening. Typically, this space is assigned to be the dining area on the ground floor; whereas on the first floor it is usually the family area. As such, regardless the orientation of the house, these two areas will not get much daylight and may result for the use of artificial lighting. As a result, these spaces need mechanical cooling because the deep floor plan deprives the areas from natural cross ventilation (Figure 3). GROUND FLOOR v! 1 Lack of claylight and mtud uoss ventiMi011 South FIRST FLOOR Figure 3: Typical Terraced House Floor Layout 4.2.2 Orientation Secondly, the site layout of a conventional terraced housing scheme is pegged against commercial return whereby maximum no. of housing units gives the highest Return on Investment (ROI). Since ROI takes precedence in a housing development and in the quest to fit in the maximum number of houses, several units receive tremendous heat gain into the indoor spaces due to poor site orientation. With reference to Figure 3, the fiont of a typical double storeys terraced house is normally assigned as the living area on the ground floor and master bedroom on the first floor. For a house with west frontage, the living area and the bedroom are exposed to heat gain in afternoon; and at night, the heat absorbed by the bricked facade is released into these spaces. As a result, occupants become thermally uncomfortable in the afternoon and at night. Consequently, they would make adjustment that involves mechanical cooling and the use of commercially supplied energy. International Sytrrposirzz Itt Devr?lo(;DtgEcorromies: Cornrrrontriities Aozong 5iversiticr.s 5.0 RETURN ON INVESTMENT (R01) ROI is a common tool used to ascertain the economic viability of almost any investment from the investor's viewpoint. Literally, it determines whether a proposed investment is wise; and how well it will repay the investor (Investopedia, 2008).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building an Adu
    BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS 1 451 S. State Street, Room 406 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 - 5480 P.O. Box 145480 CONTENT 04 OVERVIEW 08 ELIGIBILITY 11 BUILDING AN ADU Types of ADU Configurations 14 ATTACHED ADUs Existing Space Conversion // Basement Conversion // This handbook provides general Home with Attached Garage // Addition to House Exterior guidelines for property owners 21 DETACHED ADUs Detached Unit // Detached Garage Conversion // who want to add an ADU to a Attached Above Garage // Attached to Existing Garage lot that already has an existing single-family home. However, it 30 PROCESS is recommended to work with a 35 FAQ City Planner to help you answer any questions and coordinate 37 GLOSSARY your application. 39 RESOURCES ADU regulations can change, www.slc.gov/planning visit our website to ensure latest version 1.1 // 05.2020 version of the guide. 2 3 OVERVIEW WHAT IS AN ADU? An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is a complete secondary residential unit that can be added to a single-family residential lot. ADUs can be attached to or part of the primary residence, or be detached as a WHERE ARE WE? separate building in a backyard or a garage conversion. Utah is facing a housing shortage, with more An ADU provides completely separate living space people looking for a place to live than there are homes. including a kitchen, bathroom, and its own entryway. Low unemployment and an increasing population are driving a demand for housing. Growing SLC is the City’s adopted housing plan and is aimed at reducing the gap between supply and demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Terrace and Yard Plantings Ad-Hoc Committee
    SASY Neighborhood Council Proposed Terrace and Yard Plantings Ad-Hoc Committee Purpose The purpose of this ad hoc committee is to research and analyze ordinances and practices related to terrace and yard plantings; report to the SASY Council as indicated; and work with SASY, city staff, and the SASY alderperson to update ordinances to better reflect SASY neighborhood and wider community values and expectations. Background A survey of 91 properties in the heart of the SASY neighborhood showed that the majority (69%) of terraces and front yards in the neighborhood are in violation of restrictive city of Madison ordinances which broadly prohibit many plantings in terraces and private front yards. For example, prohibited are anything but grass within two feet of the curb; plantings over two feet tall in terraces; plantings and fences over three feet high within a ten-foot triangle next to driveways in each front yard; any overhang of vegetation, including grass, over the sidewalk; erection of any permanent structure on terraces, including vegetable boxes; grass over eight inches tall, including ornamental grasses; bushes and trees on terraces that are not planted by the city; plantings in a triangle ten feet along a driveway and ten feet along the sidewalk in the private front yard of each house/apartment or building; and other requirements. The city inspects and cites property owners for violations of terrace and yard planting ordinances upon submission of a complaint. The only exception is for plantings and structures for the sole purpose of erosion control. The “violations” in the SASY neighborhood almost without exception appear to enhance rather than detract from the appearance of the property and neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations As of 9/4/2021
    Approved Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations as of 9/30/2021 Permit Exp. City Facility Address Owner Permit # Date Beaumont Slangin Plates 34936 Hagen Hts Kipp Funderburk PR0081203 3/31/2022 Blythe Davis Down Home 409 San Luis Wy Stacy Davis PR0080525 12/31/2021 Dining La Cocina de Monica 18211 Maple Dr Monica Ferrer PR0082034 6/30/2022 Quesa Virria Tacos 461 Seville Ln Gustavo Valdez PR0080222 11/30/2021 Ruelas Tosti House 380 S 5th St Nora Patricia Ruelas PR0080112 10/31/2021 Canyon Lake The Wicked Spoon Cafe 29748 Redwood Dr Samantha Gorrell PR0078967 2/28/2022 Cathedral City Carnitas Valdez 33531 Pueblo Trail Julia E Valdez PR0078655 1/31/2022 Pupusas Claudia 33609 Sky Blue Water Trail Claudia Moreno PR0080245 11/30/2021 Shep's Kitchen 30260 Travis Ave Robert Shephard PR0081048 3/31/2022 Smokey Lips BBQ 31265 Sky Blue Water Trl CAE LLC PR0081854 5/31/2022 Coachella El Reaper 84017 Manhattan Ave Omar Francisco Leon PR0081963 6/30/2022 Corona Amy's CaliPinoy Kitchen 5750 Red Haven St Amelia Victorio PR0082262 7/31/2022 B's Rollin BBQ 2620 Hawk Cir Eric Burnell PR0080792 2/28/2022 Barra De Pan 1104 Fullerton Ave Lucina Silva PR0078814 1/31/2022 BNL BBQ 1100 Newfield Cir Lupe Aguilar PR0079624 7/31/2022 Boonies Pit & Q LLC 823 S Howard St Christopher McCoy PR0081858 5/31/2022 Cazonci Mexican Kitchen 1599 Border Ave Unit F Robert Oliveros PR0080900 2/28/2022 Chef J's Table 11468 Alton Dr James Cameron PR0079569 7/31/2022 Convertible Kitchen 8911 Carnation Dr Talisha Seraj PR0080521 12/31/2021 El Jefe Cuisine 1028 E Francis St Che Galvan PR0080153 10/31/2021 Enchilame y Mas 1567 Del Norte Dr Olivia Cordova PR0080623 1/31/2022 Jerky Jerk 7581 Stonegate Dr Evon McMurry PR0078974 3/31/2022 Approved Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations as of 9/30/2021 Permit Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C
    1 Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C. 2 3 Jonathan Rogers 4 Corresponding Author 5 District Department of Transportation 6 55 M Street SE 7 Washington, DC 20003 8 Tel: 202-671-3022; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 9 10 Dan Emerine 11 D.C. Office of Planning 12 1100 4th Street SW, Suite E560 13 Washington, DC 20024 14 Tel: 202-442-8812; Fax: 202-442-7638 ; Email: [email protected] 15 16 Peter Haas 17 Center for Neighborhood Technology 18 2125 W. North Ave. 19 Chicago, Il 60647 20 Tel.: 773-269-4034; Fax: 773-278-3840; Email: [email protected] 21 22 David Jackson 23 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 24 4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 800 25 Bethesda, MD 20901 26 Tel: 301-347-9108; Fax: 301-347-0101; Email: [email protected] 27 28 Peter Kauffmann 29 Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. 30 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 600 31 Washington, DC 20036 32 Tel: 202-296-8625; Fax: 202-785-1276; Email: [email protected] 33 34 Rick Rybeck 35 Just Economics, LLC 36 1669 Columbia Rd., NW, Suite 116 37 Washington, DC 20009 38 Tel: 202-439-4176; Fax: 202-265-1288; Email: [email protected] 39 40 Ryan Westrom 41 District Department of Transportation 42 55 M Street SE 43 Washington, DC 20003 44 Tel: 202-671-2041; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 45 46 Word count: 5,468 words text + 8 tables/figures x 250 words (each) = 7,468 words 1 Submission Date: November 13, 2015 1 ABSTRACT 2 The District Department of Transportation and the District of Columbia Office of Planning 3 recently led a research effort to understand how parking utilization in multi-family residential 4 buildings is related to neighborhood and building characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE to RESIDENCE LIVING 2021-2022 Florida State University
    GUIDE TO RESIDENCE LIVING 2021-2022 Florida State University (850) 644-2860 [email protected] 1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 2 Residential Student Experience ......................................................................... 3 Learning Goals .................................................................................................. 4 Florida State University Civility Statement ......................................................... 4 Residence Hall Staff ........................................................................................... 5 COVID-19 & Public Health ................................................................................. 6 Residence Hall Information ................................................................................ 7 Moving In........................................................................................................... 9 Moving Out ...................................................................................................... 10 Personalize Your Room .................................................................................... 11 Getting Involved in the Halls ............................................................................ 12 Roommate Relationships ................................................................................ 14 Safety in the Halls ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Food
    Suggested Grades: 2nd - 5th BACKYARD FOOD WEB Wildlife Champions at Home Science Experiment 2-LS4-1: Make observations of plants and animals to compare the diversity of life in different habitats. What is a food web? All living things on earth are either producers, consumers or decomposers. Producers are organisms that create their own food through the process of photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is when a living thing uses sunlight, water and nutrients from the soil to create its food. Most plants are producers. Consumers get their energy by eating other living things. Consumers can be either herbivores (eat only plants – like deer), carnivores (eat only meat – like wolves) or omnivores (eat both plants and meat - like humans!) Decomposers are organisms that get their energy by eating dead plants or animals. After a living thing dies, decomposers will break down the body and turn it into nutritious soil for plants to use. Mushrooms, worms and bacteria are all examples of decomposers. A food web is a picture that shows how energy (food) passes through an ecosystem. The easiest way to build a food web is by starting with the producers. Every ecosystem has plants that make their own food through photosynthesis. These plants are eaten by herbivorous consumers. These herbivores are then hunted by carnivorous consumers. Eventually, these carnivores die of illness or old age and become food for decomposers. As decomposers break down the carnivore’s body, they create delicious nutrients in the soil which plants will use to live and grow! When drawing a food web, it is important to show the flow of energy (food) using arrows.
    [Show full text]
  • Patio Design Has Photos from Real Homes and Yards Across the Paci C Northwest
    NW HOME & YARD IDEA BOOK Clay & Concrete Pavers PATIO Permeable Pavers Slate & Patio Stones DESIGN Architectural Slabs At Mutual Materials, we are proud of what we do and are inspired to see our products chosen by professionals to build communities. Our products build beauty that lasts through hospitals, schools, stadiums, businesses, family homes, public parks, and backyards. Mutual Materials has long served a professional network of architects, interior designers, builders, masons, and landscape design professionals. Today we also serve residential homeowners, both through our professional networks and through our retail branch locations. A Message from our President Have you ever spent time looking at your local sports stadium, or your child’s school, or even your neighbor’s backyard and wondered where the products come from that put it all together? Well, that’s what Mutual Materials does – we have been part of building beauty that lasts over one hundred years. Since 1900, we have been providing masonry and hardscape products to customers in the Paci c Northwest to help them create inviting communities that stand the test of time. Our products are used to create schools, stadiums, public landscapes, business parks, family homes and gardens, and much more. Mutual Materials is also a family business and we locally manufacture the products we Kendall Anderegg sell. From humble beginnings with one brick plant in 1900, we have grown today into a President, Mutual Materials major regional employer operating more than 10 manufacturing plants and 16 branch o ces across Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia. Our Idea Book for Patio Design has photos from real homes and yards across the Paci c Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Safe Room Inside Your House COURTESY of NOAA/NSSL Includes Construction Plans and Cost Estimates
    FEMA 320 FIRST EDITION October 1998 COURTESY OF NASA COURTESY Taking Shelter From the Storm: Building a Safe Room Inside Your House COURTESY OF NOAA/NSSL Includes Construction Plans and Cost Estimates Federal Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Directorate 500 C Street, SW. • Washington, DC 20472 www.fema.gov Acknowledgments This booklet and the construction drawings it contains would not have been possible without the pioneering work of the Wind Engineering Research Center at Texas Tech University, the diligent efforts of the design team, and the constructive suggestions of the reviewers. Design Team Reviewers Paul Tertell, P.E. Dennis Lee Project Officer Hurricane Program Manager Program Policy and Assessment Branch Mitigation Division Mitigation Directorate FEMA Region VI FEMA Denton, Texas Washington, DC Bill Massey Clifford Oliver, CEM Hurricane Program Manager Chief, Program Policy and Assessment Branch Mitigation Division Mitigation Directorate FEMA Region IV FEMA Atlanta, Georgia Washington, DC TIm Sheckler, P.E. Dr. Ernst Kiesling, P.E. Civil Engineer Professor of Civil Engineering National Earthquake Program Office Wind Engineering Research Center Mitigation Directorate Texas Tech University FEMA Lubbock, Texas Washington, DC Dr. Kishor Mehta, P.E. Dr. Richard Peterson Director, Wind Engineering Research Center Chairman, Department of Geosciences Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas Lubbock, Texas Russell Carter, E.I.T. Larry Tanner, P.E., R.A. Research Associate Research Associate Wind Engineering Research Center Wind Engineering Research Center Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas Lubbock, Texas William Coulbourne, P.E. Richard Vognild, P.E Structural Engineer Director, Technical Services Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc. Southern Building Code Congress International Greenbelt, Maryland Birmingham, Alabama Jay Crandell, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Improved Design Criteria for Low-Rise Buildings in Developing Countries to Better Resist the Effects of Extreme Winds
    AlllDD TTEtD?! ~..,».o. BUILDING SCIENCE SERIES 56 fi™i?}™?*''°S * TECH R.I.C. f ""proved Design Criteria to Better Resistthe Effects of Extreme Winds for Low-Rise Buildings in Developing Countries U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards The Building Science Series ^Yo. I'he Building .Sciciico Series disseminates technical information developed at the National Bureau of Standards on liuilding materials, components, systems, and whole structures. The Series presents research results, test methods, and performance criteria related to the structural and environmental functions and the durability and safety char- ac^terisUcs of building elements and systems. These publications, similar in style and content to the NBS Building Materials and Structures Reports <1938-59), are directed toward the manufacturing, design, construction, and research segments of the building industry, standards organizations, and officials responsible for building codes. The material for this Series originates principally in the Center for Building Technology of the NBS Institute for Applied Technology. The publications are divided into three general groups: Building Systems and Processes; Health, Safety and Comfort; and Structures and Materials. For further information regarding these publications please contact the Scientific and Professional Liaison Section, Center for Building Technology, Institute for Ap- plied Technology. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234. I See mailing list announcement on last page l NOV V 1374 Development of Improved Design Criteria for Low-Rise Buildings in Developing Countries to Better Resist the Effects of Extreme Winds Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Dr. Paulino J. Garcia Memorial Hall National Science Development Board Manila, Philippines November 14-17, 1973 Edited by Noel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Keys to Safer Food Manual
    FIVE KEYS TO SAFER FOOD MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SAFETY, ZOONOSES AND FOODBORNE DISEASES FIVE KEYS TO SAFER FOOD MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SAFETY, ZOONOSES AND FOODBORNE DISEASES INTRODUCTION Food safety is a significant public health issue nsafe food has been a human health problem since history was first recorded, and many food safety Uproblems encountered today are not new. Although governments all over the world are doing their best to improve the safety of the food supply, the occurrence of foodborne disease remains a significant health issue in both developed and developing countries. It has been estimated that each year 1.8 million people die as a result of diarrhoeal diseases and most of these cases can be attributed to contaminated food or water. Proper food preparation can prevent most foodborne diseases. More than 200 known diseases are transmitted through food.1 The World Health Organization (WHO) has long been aware of the need to educate food handlers about their responsibilities for food safety. In the early 1990s, WHO developed the Ten Golden Rules for Safe Food Preparation, which were widely translated and reproduced. However, it became obvious that something simpler and more generally applicable was needed. After nearly a year of consultation with food safety expertsandriskcommunicators, WHOintroducedtheFive KeystoSaferFoodposterin2001.TheFive Keys toSaferFoodposterincorporatesallthemessagesoftheTen Golden Rules for Safe Food Preparation under simpler headings that are more easily remembered and also provides more details on the reasoning behind the suggested measures. The Five Keys to Safer Food Poster The core messages of the Five Keys to Safer Food are: (1) keep clean; (2) separate raw and cooked; (3) cook thoroughly; (4) keep food at safe temperatures; and (5) use safe water and raw materials.
    [Show full text]
  • 20.17.000 Building Size and Floor Area Regulations
    20.17.000 BUILDING SIZE AND FLOOR AREA REGULATIONS 20.17.010 MINIMUM REQUIRED. Any building intended in whole or part for residential purposes shall provide a minimum floor area, and basement or utility area as hereinafter specified by the regulations for the District in which such building is located. A. The minimum floor requirement for residential use shall be based upon the number of bedrooms, as defined by the Building Code, and total rooms, as defined by the Building Code exclusive of bathrooms, and is stated in terms of the total useable residential floor area required per family on a single floor level. B. In any district which requires minimum floor area for purposes and an attached garage requirement (sic), the district may credit a portion of the garage area toward the required minimum floor area. Carports shall not be so credited nor garages built at a basement level. C. In the case of any residential building which has more than a single floor level, the total of all liveable floor area which is not over any other liveable floor area shall be called the First Floor Area, and shall conform to the required minimum total floor area, except that the required First Floor Area may be reduced, to any further minimum as established and in proportion to an increase in total liveable floor area as set forth in the individual district regulations. 1. The individual district regulations may allow that a percentage of any such increase in total liveable floor area may be unfinished floor space capable under the Building Code or this Ordinance below of being finished to liveable floor area, provided such unfinished area is in the second story of a two story home as defined on the fold-out chart, (see 20.33.000.) In addition to requirements of the Building Code, such space shall meet the following requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Lighting: a Review of 80 Years of Standards and Recommendations
    LBL-35036 WG-31I Published in the Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Industry Applications Society AnnUalMeeting, October 2-8, 1993 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Office Lighting: A Review of 80 Years of Standards and Recommendations Wemer K.E. Osterhaus Energy and Environment Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, Califomia 94720 May 1993 This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Building Technologies, Building Systems and Materials Division of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE- AC03-76SF00098. Office Lighting: A Review of 80 Years of Standards and Recommendations . Werner K. E. Osterhaus Windows and Daylighting Group Building Technologies Program Energy and Environment Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 U.S.A. Abstract - This paper traces the development of Lighting conditions were among the dominant complaints quantitative office lighting standards from its from workers. Illuminating engineers recognized that beginnings to the present. It discusses the inadequate lighting was responsible for many industrial oources of recommended lighting practice, the accidents. Extensive data, accumulated by Simpson [i] and nature of the quantitative recommendations, and others provide convincing proof of this condition. The loss trends in recommended values on a comparative of visual power through improper lighting could not be so basis. A critical assessment of contemporary easily recorded, but ophthalmologists [2 and 3] warned about standards is provided within this historical its dangers. context. "Insufficient and improperly applied illumination is a prolific cause of industrial accidents. In the past few years I. INTRODUCTION numerous investigators, studying the cause of accidents, have found that the accident rate in plants with poor lighting is In exploring the development of lighting standards for higher than in similar plants which are well illuminated.
    [Show full text]