Russell G. Ragsdale, City and County Clerk
SAMPLE BALLOT CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD, COLORADO NOVEMBER 2, 2010 Page 1 of 4
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER: completely fill in the OVAL to the RIGHT of your choice like this If you tear, deface, or wrongly mark this ballot, return it to an election worker; or contact the Broomfield Elections Division at 303.438.6213 or email [email protected] to request a replacement.
FEDERAL OFFICES REPRESENTATIVE TO THE 112TH STATE OF COLORADO UNITED STATES CONGRESS - GOVERNOR/LIEUTENANT UNITED STATES SENATOR DISTRICT 2 (Vote for One) GOVERNOR (Vote for One) (Vote for One Pair) Ken Buck Stephen Bailey John Hickenlooper Republican Republican Joseph Garcia Democratic Michael F. Bennet Jared Polis Democratic Democratic Dan Maes Bob Kinsey Curtis Harris Tambor Williams Green Libertarian Republican (Signed delcaration to limit service to no more than 2 terms) Maclyn "Mac" Stringer Jenna Goss Jaimes Brown Libertarian American Constitution Ken Wyble (Signed declaration to limit service to no more than 3 terms) Libertarian Charley Miller Unaffiliated (Chose not to sign declaration to limit service to 2 terms) Write-in Tom Tancredo J. Moromisato Pat Miller Unaffilliated American Constitution
Jason Napolitano Jason R. Clark Independent Reform Victoria A. Adams (Signed declaration to limit service to no more than 2 terms) Unaffiliated
Write-in Paul Noel Fiorino Heather A. McKibbin Unaffiliated
Write-in Page 2 of 4 SECRETARY OF STATE STATE REPRESENTATIVE - Shall Judge Katherine R. Delgado of (Vote for One) DISTRICT 33 the 17th Judicial District be retained in (Vote for One) office? Scott Gessler Donald Beezley YES NO Republican Republican Shall Judge Thomas R. Ensor of the 17th Judicial District be retained in Bernie Buescher Dianne Primavera office? Democratic Democratic YES NO Amanda Campbell DISTRICT L REGIONAL Shall Judge Frederick M. Goodbee of American Constitution TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT the 17th Juditicial District be retained in DIRECTOR office? STATE TREASURER (Vote for One) YES NO (Vote for One) Lorraine Anderson Shall Judge Patrick T. Murphy of the 17th Judicial District be retained in Walker Stapleton office? Republican Bob Willson YES NO Cary Kennedy Shall Judge C. Vincent Phelps Jr. of Democratic the 17th Judicial District be retained in JUDGES office? ATTORNEY GENERAL Shall Justice Michael L. Bender of the YES NO (Vote for One) Colorado Supreme Court be retained in office? Shall Judge Jill-Ellyn Straus of the 17th Judicial District be retained in office? Stan Garnett YES NO Democratic Shall Justice Alex J. Martinez of the YES NO Colorado Supreme Court be retained in John Suthers office? Shall Judge Amy Elizabeth Bockman of Republican the Broomfield County Court be YES NO retained in office? STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Shall Justice Nancy E. Rice of the YES NO CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 2 Colorado Supreme Court be retained in (Vote for One) office? "Ballot issues referred by the general assembly or any political subdivision Angelika Schroeder YES NO are listed by letter, and ballot issues Democratic initiated by the people are listed Shall Judge John Daniel Dailey of the numerically. A ballot issue listed as an Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in 'amendment' proposes a change to the Kaye Ferry office? Colorado constitution, and a ballot issue Republican listed as a 'proposition' proposes a YES NO change to the Colorado Revised Statutes. A 'yes' vote on any ballot REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF Shall Judge Richard L. Gabriel of the issue is a vote in favor of changing COLORADO - AT LARGE Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in current law or existing circumstances, (Vote for One) office? and a 'no' vote on any ballot issue is a vote against changing current law or Melissa Hart YES NO existing circumstances." Democratic Shall Judge Nancy J. Lichtenstein of the REFERENDUM / INITIATIVES / Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in PROPOSITIONS Steve Bosley office? Republican YES NO STATE OF COLORADO Jesse B. Wallace Shall Judge David J. Richman of the Amendment P Libertarian Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in office? (CONSTITUTIONAL) YES NO Shall there be an amendment to section 2 of article XVIII of the Shall Judge C. Scott Crabtree of the 17th constitution of the state of Colorado, Judicial District be retained in office? concerning the regulation of games of chance by an authority specified by the YES NO general assembly? YES NO
Page 3 of 4
Page 3 of 4
Amendment Q Amendment 61 Proposition 101 (STATUTORY) (CONSTITUTIONAL) (CONSTITUTIONAL) Shall there be an amendment to the Shall there be an amendment to section 3 Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Revised Statutes concerning of article VIII of the constitution of the state Colorado constitution concerning limits on government charges, and, in of Colorado, concerning a process for limitations on government borrowing, and, connection therewith, reducing vehicle temporarily moving the seat of government in connection therewith, prohibiting future ownership taxes over four years to in a disaster emergency that substantially borrowing in any form by state government; nominal amounts; ending taxes on affects the ability of the state government requiring voter approval of future borrowing vehicle rentals and leases; phasing in to operate in the city and county of Denver, by local governmental entities; limiting the form, term, and amount of total borrowing over four years a $10,000 vehicle sale and, in connection therewith, requiring the price tax exemption; setting total yearly general assembly to convene in a by each local governmental entity; directing all current borrowing to be paid; and registration, license, and title charges temporary meeting location designated by at $10 per vehicle; repealing other the governor and authorizing the general reducing tax rates after certain borrowing is specific vehicle charges; lowering the assembly to determine by law a temporary fully repaid? state income tax rate to 4.5% and location for the seat of government of the YES NO state? phasing in a further reduction in the Amendment 62 rate to 3.5%; ending state and local taxes and charges, except 911 YES NO (CONSTITUTIONAL) charges, on telecommunication service customer accounts; and stating that, Amendment R Shall there be an amendment to the with certain specified exceptions, any (CONSTITUTIONAL) Colorado constitution applying the term added charges on vehicles and "person", as used in those provisions of the telecommunication service customer Shall there be an amendment to section 3 Colorado constitution relating to inalienable accounts shall be tax increases? rights, equality of justice, and due process (1) (b) of article X of the constitution of the YES NO state of Colorado, concerning an of law, to every human being from the exemption from property taxation for a beginning of the biological development of Proposition 102 (STATUTORY) possessory interest in real property if the that human being? actual value of the interest is less than or Shall there be an amendment to the equal to six thousand dollars or such YES NO Colorado Revised Statutes requiring amount adjusted for inflation? that only defendants arrested for a first Amendment 63 offense, non violent misdemeanor may be recommended for release or YES NO (CONSTITUTIONAL) actually released to a pretrial services program's supervision in lieu of a cash, Amendment 60 Shall there be an amendment to the property, or professional surety bond? (CONSTITUTIONAL) Colorado constitution concerning the right of all persons to health care choice, and, in YES NO connection therewith, prohibiting the state Shall there be an amendment to the CITY AND COUNTY OF independently or at the instance of the Colorado constitution concerning United States from adopting or enforcing BROOMFIELD government charges on property, and, in any statute, regulation, resolution, or policy connection therewith, allowing petitions in that requires a person to participate in a QUESTION 1A all districts for elections to lower property public or private health insurance or taxes; specifying requirements for property coverage plan or that denies, restricts, or Proposed Ordinance 1928 - Prohibition tax elections; requiring enterprises and penalizes the right or ability of a person to on the Operation of Medical Marijuana authorities to pay property taxes but make or receive direct payments for lawful Businesses. This ordinance prohibits offsetting the revenues with lower tax rates; health care services; and exempting from the operation of medical marijuana prohibiting enterprises and unelected the effects of the amendment emergency businesses such as commercial boards from levying fees or taxes on medical treatment required to be provided medical marijuana centers, optional property; setting expiration dates for certain by hospitals, health facilities, and health premises cultivation operations, and tax rate and revenue increases; requiring care providers or health benefits provided marijuana-infused products school districts to reduce property tax rates under workers' compensation or similar manufacturing facilities in the City and and replacing the revenue with state aid; insurance? County of Broomfield. The ordinance and eliminating property taxes that exceed also establishes penalties for violation the dollar amount included in an approved in accordance with Chapter 1-12 of the ballot question, that exceed state property YES NO Broomfield Municipal Code. tax laws, policies, and limits existing in For the Against the 1992 that have been violated, changed, or Ordinance Ordinance weakened without state voter approval, or that were not approved by voters without certain ballot language? YES NO Page 4 of 4
Page 4 of 4
BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT ISSUE 3A
SHALL BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE 2 TAXES BE INCREASED BY $22,500,000 DOLLARS IN 2010 FOR COLLECTION IN THE 2011 CALENDAR YEAR, AND BY SUCH AMOUNTS AS MAY BE COLLECTED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER BY THE IMPOSITION OF A MILL LEVY WHICH GENERATES REVENUE, WHICH TOGETHER WITH THE REVENUES PRODUCED BY PREVIOUS VOTER AUTHORIZED TAX INCREASES OF THE DISTRICT UNDER 22-54-108, C.R.S., AS AMENDED, IS NOT GREATER THAN TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE DISTRICT’S TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING PLUS SUPPLEMENTAL COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT, TO BE USED FOR GENERAL FUND PURPOSES, WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
· RESTORING CRITICAL BUDGET CUTS; · MITIGATING FUTURE BUDGET CUTS; · SUPPLEMENTING TEACHER AND STAFF COMPENSATION; · FUNDING EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION PROGRAMS;
AND SHALL SUCH INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVIES THE DISTRICT IS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO IMPOSE; AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAXES AND THE EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AN EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? YES NO
Card 2dx