DOCSLIB.ORG

Montenegro Agenda Hazardous Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montenegro Agenda Hazardous Activities Identification of Hazardous Activities Identification of hazardous activities - requirements and link to the SEVESO II Directive Identification of Hazardous Activities For the purpose of implementing the Convention hazardous activities have to be identified Legal basis – Article 4(1) - the Party … shall take measures, as appropriate, to identify hazardous activities within its jurisdiction Article 1(b) - “Hazardous activity” means any activity in which one or more hazardous substances are present or may be present in quantities at or in excess of the threshold quantities listed in Annex I hereto, and which is capable of causing transboundary effects Combination of two criteria Quantity of hazardous substances over predefined thresholds Possibility of transboundary effects Identification of Hazardous Activities Hazardous substances and respective thresholds – Annex I Generic hazard categories Named substances Possibility of transboundary effects Consequence assessment according national requirements Guidelines to facilitate the identification of hazardous activities for the purposes of the Convention (Guidelines for Location Criteria) (decision 2000/3 in ECE/CP.TEIA/2, annex IV) Subject to consultation Identification of Hazardous Activities There should be mechanisms for: Collection of data on hazardous substances from operators Analysis and validation of data by the Competent Authority Review/update of data Including evaluating potential transboundary effects! Annex I of the Convention and Annex I of the SEVESO II Directive Annex I to the Convention and Annex I to the Seveso II Directive, define substances and threshold qualties (qualifying criteria) Hazard categories and named hazardous substances There is difference in the structure and scope of both Annexes! Structure of Annex I of the Structure of Annex I of the Convention SEVESO II Directive Part I – Categories of substances and Part I – Named substances preparations not specifically named in Part II 28 Named substances – Substances of high concern /TDI, Methyl isocyanate, Phosgene, Chlorine, Dioxins, Nickel compounds, etc./ Widely used substances /Ammonium nitrate, Part II – Named substances LPG, Petroleum products/ 12 Named substances – Part II - Categories of substances Substances of high concern /TDI, Methyl isocyanate, and preparations not specifically Phosgene, Chlorine/ Widely used substances /Ammonium nitrate, named in Part I LPG, Petroleum products/ Annex I of the Convention Where a substance or preparation named in Part II also falls within a category in Part I, the threshold quantity set out in Part II shall be used Annex I of the SEVESO II Directive Where a substance or group of substances listed in Part I also falls within a category of Part II, the qualifying quantities set out in part I must be used Qualifying quantities Annex I of the Annex I of the SEVESO Convention II Directive Column 2 (Qualifying quantity) "lower tier " Column 3 One Column (Qualifying quantity) (Threshold Quantity) " upper tier " Threshold quantities in Part I and Part II of Annex I of the Convention are in compliance with adequate threshold quantities in Column 3 of Part 1 and Part 2 of Annex I of the SEVESO II Directive (upper-tier establishments) Reservation The EC reserves the right as concernes the threshold quantities mentioned in Annex I, Part I, Nos 4, 5 and 6 to the Convention, to apply threshold quantities of 100 tonnes for bromine (very toxic substance), 5000 tonnes for methanol (toxic substance) and 2000 tonnes for oxygen (oxidising substance). Conclusion The scope of the Convention follows one-tier approach The scope of the Seveso II Directive follows a two-tier approach According to Council Decision 98/685/EC of 23 March 1998, for EU member States all establishments covered by article 9 of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 (Seveso II), i.e. upper-tier establishments, are taken to meet substance and quantity criteria under the Convention. Two harmonised approaches for the same aim - identification of hazardous activities. Identification of Hazardous Activities – Annex I Structure of Annex I Part I - Categories of substances and preparations not specifically named in Part II Based on generic toxicological, physical-chemical or ecotoxicological properties Characteristic endpoints – LD50, LC50, EC50, flashpoint, etc. Part II – Named substances Substances of high concern /TDI, Methyl isocyanide, phosgene, chlorine/ Widely used substances /ammonium nitrate, LPG, petroleum products/ Explanatory Notes History of Annex I Introduced with temporary thresholds Amended in 2008 Introduction of single threshold quantities Harmonization with Annex I of the Seveso II Directive Need for second revision Transition to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Alignment with the Seveso III Directive Part I – Categories of substances and preparations not specifically named in Part II (Annex I of the Convention) Category Threshold Quantity (Tones) 1. Flammable (note 2) 50 000 2a. Highly flammable (note 3a and b) 200 2b. Highly flammable (note 3c) 50 000 3. Extremely flammable (note 4) 50 4. Toxic (note 5) 200 5. Very toxic (note 6) 20 6. Oxidizing (note 7) 200 7a. Explosive, where the substance, preparation or article 200 falls under Division 1.4 of the GHS criteria (note 8) 7b. Explosive, where the substance, preparation or 50 article falls under Division 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5 or 1.6 of the GHS criteria (note 8) 8a. Dangerous for the environment – “Toxic to 500 aquatic organisms” (note 9) 8b. Dangerous for the environment – “Very 200 toxic to aquatic organisms” (note 10) Part II – Named substances (Annex I of the Convention) Substance Threshold Quantity (Tones) 1. Ammonium nitrate (note 11,12,13,14) 10.000/5.000/2.500/50 2. Potassium nitrate (note 15,16) 10.000/5.000 3. Chlorine 25 4. Ethylene oxide 50 5. Hydrogen 50 6. Toluene diisocyanate 100 7. Sulfur-trioxide 75 8. Lead alkyls 50 9. Phosgene 0,75 10. Methyl isocyanate 0,15 11. Liquefied extremely flammable gases (including 200 LPG) and natural gas 12. Petroleum products: gasolines and naphthas; 25.000 kerosens (including jet fuels); gas oils (including diesel fuels, home heating oils and gas oil blending streams) Annex I, Part 1 Annex I – Categories of substances and preparations PART I. Categories of substances and preparations not specifically named in Part II No Category Threshold Quantity (metric tons) 1. Flammable2 50,000 2a. Highly flammable3(a) and (b) 200 2b. Highly flammable3(c) 50,000 3. Extremely flammable4 50 4. Toxic5 200 5. Very toxic6 20 6. Oxidizing7 200 7a. Explosive, where the substance, preparation or article falls under 200 Division 1.4 of the GHS criteria8 7b. Explosive, where the substance, preparation or article falls under 50 Division 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5 or 1.6 of the GHS criteria8 8a. Dangerous for the environment – “Toxic to aquatic organisms”9 500 8b. Dangerous to the environment – “Very toxic to aquatic organisms”10 200 Flammable – LIQUID substances and preparations having a flash point equal to or greater than 21°C and less than or equal to 55°C, supporting combustion – Long chain and/or aromatic hydrocarbons and derivates thereof • xylene, styrene • dibutyl ether • di-n-butylamine – About 130 entries – Solvents, raw materials and intermediates in the chemical industry, paints, etc. Highly Flammable – LIQUIDS – (a) Substances and preparations which may become hot and finally catch fire in contact with air at ambient temperature without any input of energy (are spontaneously flammable in air); – (b) Substances and preparations, which have a flashpoint lower than 55°C and remain liquid under pressure, where particular processing conditions, such as high pressure or high temperature, may create major accident hazards; and – (c) Substances and preparations having a flash point lower than 21°C and which are not extremely flammable. – Shorter chain and/or lower molecular mass liquids • carbon disulphide, heptane, toluene Extremely Flammable – Gaseous and Liquid State – (a) Liquid substances and preparations which have a flash point lower than 0°C and whose boiling point (or, in the case of a boiling range, initial boiling point) at normal pressure is less than or equal to 35°C; – (b) Gases which are flammable in contact with air at ambient temperature and pressure, and which are in a gaseous or supercritical state; and – (c) Flammable and highly flammable liquid substances and preparations maintained at a temperature above their boiling point. – Gaseous methane, propane, butane, hydrogen, diethyl ether, ethylene oxide Toxic – Substances with properties corresponding to those in table 1 or table 2 and having physical and chemical properties capable of creating industrial accident hazards TABLE 1 LD50(oral)(1) LD50(dermal)(2) LC50(3) mg/kg body weight mg/kg body weight mg/l (inhalation) 25 < LD50 < 200 50 < LD50 < 400 0.5 < LC50 < 2 (1) LD50 oral in rats (2) LD50 dermal in rats or rabbits (3) LC50 by inhalation (four hours) in rats TABLE 2 Discriminating dose mg/kg body weight = 5 where the acute oral toxicity in animals of the substance has been determined using the fixed-dose procedure •About 420 entries •Endpoints - lethal dose or lethal concentration •No single value – if differing LD50 values are available, take the lowest! •It is up to the operator to prove hazardous properties – substances with propertiesVery corresponding Toxic to those in table 3 or table 4 and which, owing to their physical and chemical properties, are capable of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Use and Storage of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) at Bayer Cropscience
    Summary The Use and Storage of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) at Bayer CropScience The use of hazardous chemicals such as methyl isocyanate can be a significant concern to the residents of communities adjacent to chemical facilities, but is often an integral, necessary part of the chemical manufacturing process. In order to ensure that chemical manufacturing takes place in a manner that is safe for workers, members of the local community, and the environment, the philosophy of inherently safer processing can be used to identify opportuni­ ties to eliminate or reduce the hazards associated with chemical processing. However, the concepts of inherently safer process analysis have not yet been adopted in all chemical manu­ facturing plants. This report presents a possible framework to help plant managers choose between alternative processing options—considering factors such as environmental impact and product yield as well as safety—to develop a chemical manufacturing system. n 2008, an explosion at the Bayer CropScience chemical production Iplant in Institute, West Virginia, resulted in the deaths of two employees, a fire within the production unit, and extensive damage to nearby structures. The accident drew renewed attention to the fact that the Bayer facility manufac­ tured and stored methyl isocyanate, or MIC—a volatile, highly toxic chemical used in the production of carbamate pesticides and the agent responsible for thousands of deaths in Bhopal, India, in 1984. In the Institute incident, debris Figure 1. The Bayer CropScience facility at Insitute, WV. from the blast hit the shield surrounding Google Earth satellite image: © 2012 Google a MIC storage tank, and although the container was not damaged, an investiga­ tion by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Guidance to Protect POTW Workers from Toxic and Reactive
    United States Office Of Water EPA 812-B-92-001 Environmental Protection (EN-336) NTIS No. PB92-173-236 Agency June 1992 EPA Guidance To Protect POTW Workers From Toxic And Reactive Gases And Vapors DISCLAIMER: This is a guidance document only. Compliance with these procedures cannot guarantee worker safety in all cases. Each POTW must assess whether measures more protective of worker health are necessary at each facility. Confined-spaceentry, worker right-to-know, and worker health and safety issues not directly related to toxic or reactive discharges to POTWs are beyond the scope of this guidance document and are not addressed. Additional copies of this document and other EPA documentsreferenced in this document can be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) at: 5285 Port Royal Rd. Springfield, VA 22161 Ph #: 703-487-4650 (NTIS charges a fee for each document.) FOREWORD In 1978, EPA promulgated the General Pretreatment Regulations [40 CFR Part 403] to control industrial discharges to POTWs that damage the collection system, interfere with treatment plant operations, limit sewage sludge disposal options, or pass through inadequately treated into receiving waters On July 24, 1990, EPA amended the General Pretreatment Regulations to respond to the findings and recommendations of the Report to Congress onthe Discharge of Hazardous Wastesto Publicly Owned Treatment Works (the “Domestic Sewage Study”), which identified ways to strengthen the control of hazardous wastes discharged to POTWs. The amendments add
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation Of'hetrazan'in Body Fluids
    No. 4183 December 31, 1949 NATURE II 35 strated by a coupled oxidation of alcohol in the blank value of about 1 (J.gm.fml. Further, trichlor­ presence of catalase6 • As an artificial ascorbic oxidase acetic acid precipitation removes about 20 per cent it had a Qo8 ((.Ll. oxygen per mgm. dry weight per hr.) of added 'Hetrazan'. Therefore, although it may at pH 7·2 and 39° C. of about 10,000. Hydrogen be more tedious, it is preferable to extract serum or cyanide inhibited this catalysed oxidation of ascorbic plasma. acid by combining with modified ferricytochrome c, Urines show a blank value of about 5 flgm.fml., thus preventing its reduction, while carbon monoxide, but occasionally, in concentrated urines, the blank by combining with modified ferrocytochrome c, may reach 20 vgm.jml. prevented its oxidation. The carbon monoxide The method is sufficiently sensitive to measure a inhibition was somewhat light-sensitive. This reaction blood concentration of 'Hetrazan' of 1 (J.gm.jml. Like was also inhibited by methyl isocyanide and nitroso­ most of these methods, it lacks specificity, but has benzene. Modified cytochrome c also catalysed the been found useful in following the concentration jn decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, being itself blood and urine after oral administration of the drug. destroyed in this reaction. Cyanide inhibited this A full account of the results of these experiments catalysed decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. will be published later. Typically, ingestion of The result of this experiment agrees with an 10 mgm.jkgm. body-weight of the hydrochloride observation of Keilin and Hartrees that when cyto­ results in a maximum plasma concentration of about chrome c is made autoxidizable it loses its catalytical 5-7 [lgm.jml., reached in three hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Interferometric Observations of Large Biologically Interesting Interstellar and Cometary Molecules
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE Interferometric observations of large biologically interesting interstellar and cometary molecules Lewis E. Snyder* Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois, 1002 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801 Edited by William Klemperer, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved May 26, 2006 (received for review March 3, 2006) Interferometric observations of high-mass regions in interstellar molecular clouds have revealed hot molecular cores that have sub- stantial column densities of large, partly hydrogen-saturated molecules. Many of these molecules are of interest to biology and thus are labeled ‘‘biomolecules.’’ Because the clouds containing these molecules provide the material for star formation, they may provide insight into presolar nebular chemistry, and the biomolecules may provide information about the potential of the associated inter- stellar chemistry for seeding newly formed planets with prebiotic organic chemistry. In this overview, events are outlined that led to the current interferometric array observations. Clues that connect this interstellar hot core chemistry to the solar system can be found in the cometary detection of methyl formate and the interferometric maps of cometary methanol. Major obstacles to under- standing hot core chemistry remain because chemical models are not well developed and interferometric observations have not been very sensitive. Differentiation in the molecular isomers glycolaldehdye, methyl formate, and acetic acid has been observed, but not explained. The extended source structure for certain sugars, aldehydes, and alcohols may require nonthermal formation mechanisms such as shock heating of grains. Major advances in understanding the formation chemistry of hot core species can come from obser- vations with the next generation of sensitive, high-resolution arrays.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Portable HAZMAT Sensors for First Responders
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Assessment of Portable HAZMAT Sensors for First Responders Author(s): Chad Huffman, Ph.D., Lars Ericson, Ph.D. Document No.: 246708 Date Received: May 2014 Award Number: 2010-IJ-CX-K024 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant report available electronically. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Assessment of Portable HAZMAT Sensors for First Responders DOJ Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Sensor, Surveillance, and Biometric Technologies (SSBT) Center of Excellence (CoE) March 1, 2012 Submitted by ManTech Advanced Systems International 1000 Technology Drive, Suite 3310 Fairmont, West Virginia 26554 Telephone: (304) 368-4120 Fax: (304) 366-8096 Dr. Chad Huffman, Senior Scientist Dr. Lars Ericson, Director UNCLASSIFIED This project was supported by Award No. 2010-IJ-CX-K024, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Safety Data Sheet Is for Carbon Dioxide Supplied in Cylinders with 33 Cubic Feet (935 Liters) Or Less Gas Capacity (DOT - 39 Cylinders)
    MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Prepared to U.S. OSHA, CMA, ANSI and Canadian WHMIS Standards 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION CHEMICAL NAME; CLASS: CARBON DIOXIDE SYNONYMS: Carbon Anhydride, Carbonic Acid Gas, Carbonic Anhydride, Carbon Dioxide USP CHEMICAL FAMILY NAME: Acid Anhydride FORMULA: CO2 Document Number: 50007 Note: This Material Safety Data Sheet is for Carbon Dioxide supplied in cylinders with 33 cubic feet (935 liters) or less gas capacity (DOT - 39 cylinders). For Carbon Dioxide in large cylinders refer to Document Number 10039. PRODUCT USE: Calibration of Monitoring and Research Equipment MANUFACTURED/SUPPLIED FOR: ADDRESS: 821 Chesapeake Drive Cambridge, MD 21613 EMERGENCY PHONE: CHEMTREC: 1-800-424-9300 BUSINESS PHONE: 1-410-228-6400 General MSDS Information 1-713/868-0440 Fax on Demand: 1-800/231-1366 CARBON DIOXIDE - CO2 MSDS EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 31, 2005 PAGE 1 OF 9 2. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Carbon Dioxide is a colorless, odorless, non-flammable gas. Over-exposure to Carbon Dioxide can increase respiration and heart rate, possibly resulting in circulatory insufficiency, which may lead to coma and death. At concentrations between 2-10%, Carbon Dioxide can cause nausea, dizziness, headache, mental confusion, increased blood pressure and respiratory rate. Exposure to Carbon Dioxide can also cause asphyxiation, through displacement of oxygen. If the gas concentration reaches 10% or more, suffocation can occur within minutes. Moisture in the air could lead to the formation of carbonic acid which can be irritating to the eyes. SYMPTOMS OF OVER-EXPOSURE BY ROUTE OF EXPOSURE: The most significant routes of over-exposure for this gas are by inhalation, and contact with the cryogenic liquid.
    [Show full text]
  • A Toxicological Review of the Products of Combustion
    HPA-CHaPD-004 A Toxicological Review of the Products of Combustion J C Wakefield ABSTRACT The Chemical Hazards and Poisons Division (CHaPD) is frequently required to advise on the health effects arising from incidents due to fires. The purpose of this review is to consider the toxicity of combustion products. Following smoke inhalation, toxicity may result either from thermal injury, or from the toxic effects of substances present. This review considers only the latter, and not thermal injury, and aims to identify generalisations which may be made regarding the toxicity of common products present in fire smoke, with respect to the combustion conditions (temperature, oxygen availability, etc.), focusing largely on the adverse health effects to humans following acute exposure to these chemicals in smoke. The prediction of toxic combustion products is a complex area and there is the potential for generation of a huge range of pyrolysis products depending on the nature of the fire and the conditions of burning. Although each fire will have individual characteristics and will ultimately need to be considered on a case by case basis there are commonalities, particularly with regard to the most important components relating to toxicity. © Health Protection Agency Approval: February 2010 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Publication: February 2010 Chemical Hazards and Poisons Division £15.00 Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ ISBN 978-0-85951- 663-1 This report from HPA Chemical Hazards and Poisons Division reflects understanding and evaluation of the current scientific evidence as presented and referenced in this document. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Chemical Hazards and Poisons Division (CHaPD) is frequently required to advise on the health effects arising from incidents due to fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalyzed Reaction of Isocyanates (RNCO) with Water
    Catalyzed Reaction of Isocyanates (RNCO) with Water Mark E. Wolf,y Jonathon E. Vandezande,z,{ and Henry F. Schaefer III∗,y yCenter for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, 140 Cedar Street, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA z1st Source Research, 617 Hutton St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA {Zymergen, 5980 Horton Street, Suite 105, Emeryville, California 94608, USA E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +1 706 542-2067. Fax: +1 706 542-0406 Abstract The reactions between substituted isocyanates (RNCO) and other small molecules (e.g. water, alcohols, and amines) are of significant industrial importance, particularly for the development of novel polyurethanes and other useful polymers. We present very high level ab initio computations on the HNCO + H2O reaction, with results tar- geting the CCSDT(Q)/CBS//CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ level of theory. Our results affirm that hydrolysis can occur across both the N−C and C−O bonds of HNCO via con- certed mechanisms to form carbamate or imidic acid with ∆H0K barrier heights of 38.5 −1 and 47.5 kcal mol . A total of 24 substituted RNCO + H2O reactions were studied. Geometries obtained with a composite method and refined with CCSD(T)/CBS single point energies determine that substituted RNCO species have a significant influence on these barrier heights, with an extreme case like fluorine lowering both barriers by close to 20 kcal mol−1 and most common alkyl substituents lowering both by approxi- mately 4 kcal mol−1. Natural Bond Oribtal (NBO) analysis provides evidence that the 1 predicted barrier heights are strongly associated with the occupation of the in-plane C−O* orbital of the RNCO reactant.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is in Your Cigarette?
    What Is In Your Cigarette? There are more than 4,000 ingredients, including 43 known cancer-causing (carcinogenic) compounds and 400 other toxins in a cigarette other than tobacco. Common additives include yeast, wine, caffeine, beeswax and chocolate. Here are some other ingredients: • Ammonia • Cadmium • Megastigmatrienone (Household cleaner) (Used in batteries) (Chemical naturally found in grapefruit juice) • Angelica root extract • Cyanide (Deadly poison) (Known to cause cancer in • Maltitol • DDT (A banned insecticide) animals) (Sweetener for diabetics) • Ethyl Furoate • Arsenic • Napthalene (Causes liver damage in (Used in rat poisons) (Ingredient in mothballs) animals) • Benzene • Methyl isocyanate • Lead (Used in making dyes, (Its accidental release killed (Poisonous in high doses) synthetic rubber) 2000 people in Bhopal, India in 1984) • Formaldehiyde (Used to • Butane preserve dead specimens) (Gas; used in lighter fluid) • Polonium (Cancer-causing radioactive • Methoprene (Insecticide) • Carbon monoxide element) (Poisonous gas) Important to know: • Fungicides and pesticides -- Cause many types of cancers and birth defects. • Cadmium -- Linked to lung and prostate cancer. • Benzene -- Linked to leukemia. • Formaldehyde -- Linked to lung cancer. • Nickel -- Causes increased susceptibility to lung infections. If you are angry that so many things have been added to the cigarettes you enjoy so much, you should be. Many of these chemicals were added to make you better able to tolerate toxic amounts of cigarette smoke. Make sure that you have the last laugh. Regardless of the countless chemicals in your cigarettes, quitting is always your option. Cigna Members: Call (855) 246 – 1873 to speak with a health coach today! Non-Cigna Members: Call (877) U – Can – Now for the Florida Quit Line to speak to a health coach today! .
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Detta Föreställer Kapitelrubrik (1K Kapitelrubrik)
    SCOEL/SUM/118 September 2006 Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Methyl Isocyanate 8-hour TWA: - STEL (15 min): 0,02 ppm Additional classification: - Substance Identity and Properties CAS No.: 624-83-9 Synonyms: isocyanic acid methylester Structure: H3C-N=C=O Molecular weight: 57.06 Boiling point: 39°C Melting point: -45°C Vapour pressure: 46.4 kPa (20°C) Conversion factors: 1 ppm = 2.4 mg/m3 1 mg/m3 = 0.4 ppm Classification: F+; R12 Extremely flammable Repr.Cat.3; R63 Possible risk of harm to the unborn child T+; R26 Very toxic by inhalation T; R24/25 Toxic in contact with skin and if swallowed R42/43 May cause sensitization by inhalation and skin contact Xi; R37/38 Irritating to respiratory system and skin R41 Risk of serious damage to eyes 1 This summary document is based on a consensus document from the Swedish Criteria Group for Occupational Standards (Montelius, 2002). Methyl isocyanate (MIC) is a monoisocyanate and should be distinguished from the diisocyanates. At room temperature MIC is a clear liquid. It is sparingly soluble in water, although on contact with water it reacts violently, producing a large amount of heat. MIC has a sharp odour with an odour threshold above 2 ppm (Römpp and Falbe, 1997). Occurrence and Use Methylisocyanate (MIC) occurs primarily as an intermediate in the production of carbamate pesticides. It has also been used in the production of polymers (Hrhyhorczuk et al., 1992). Photolytic breakdown of N-methyldithiocarbamate releases some MIC, and it can therefore occur in the air around application of the pesticides (Geddes et al., 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent Office Patented Jan
    3,712,911 United States Patent Office Patented Jan. 23, 1973 1. 2 Another possibility is for R1 and R2 to jointly form an 3,712,911 alkylidene radical, as in the compound METALLIZED SOCYANDES Ulrich Schoellkopf, Bovenden, and Fritz Gerhart, Gottin EC-CEI-CE=C-N=C gen, Germany, assignors to Badische Anilin- & Soda Fabrik Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen (Rhine), Ger Me many or to denote a carboxylic radical together with the alpha No Drawing. Filed Oct. 20, 1969, Ser. No. 867,941 carbon atom of the isocyanide, as in cyclohexylisocyanide. Int, C. C07c 119/02 The radicals R in the ROOC- and ROC-groups may U.S. C. 260-464 8 Claims in principle have the same meanings as the radicals R and R. In ROOC-R may also be a metal ion (Me) and in O ov-ROC-hydrogen. ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Me in the first-mentioned general formula stands for ov-Metalated isocyanides containing the radical alkali metal, i.e. lithium, sodium or potassium, or an equivalent of magnesium, zinc or cadmium. 5 As can be seen from the details given above, the metal lized isocyanides of this invention constitute a new class Me of compounds characterized by the as an essential portion of the molecule. Me stands for alkali or an equivalent of magnesium, zinc or cadmium. Their manufacture is accomplished by replacing hydrogen 20 on the cy-carbon of an isocyanide with said metals. The portion of the molecule. compounds open up new routes for organic synthesis and Examples of individual compounds of this class are therefore have outstanding importance as intermediates, c-metal methyl isocyanide, a-metal ethyl isocyanide, c e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Methyl Isocyanate (Mic)
    METHYL ISOCYANATE (MIC) I. Protocol Overview Methyl isocyanate, classified as a choking/pulmonary agent, is a water reactive liquid at room temperature. Methyl isocyanate is irritating and corrosive to the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract, including asthma-like allergy. Exposure to methyl isocyanate can result in cough, difficulty breathing, chest pain, excessive tearing (lacrimation), swelling of the eyes, and unconsciousness. Late stage exposure (next 24 to72 hours) can include acute lung injury, cardiac arrest, and death. Decontamination of patients is absolutely critical. For all suspected chemical exposures, consult the Poison Control Center (800-222-1222) located at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Information and treatment advice is available to the public and healthcare professionals at no charge. Methyl isocyanate is an intermediate chemical in the production of carbamate pesticides (such as carbaryl, carbofuran, methomyl, and aldicarb). It has been used in the production of rubbers and adhesives. The Bhopal India Disaster of 1984 was caused by the accidental release of 40 tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas from a Union Carbide pesticide plant. Greenpeace cites 20,000 total deaths from related illnesses as its conservative estimate with nearly 3,000 people dead initially. Bhopal is frequently cited as the world's worst industrial disaster. There are no clinical biomarkers known for methyl isocyanate exposure. Routine laboratory studies include chest radiography and pulse oximetry (or ABG measurements). Rapid toxicological screening may rule out other exposures. Air samples may be analyzed using XAD-7 adsorption tubes followed analysis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a fluorescence or ultraviolet (UV) detector. The Delaware Public Health Laboratory does not perform this testing.
    [Show full text]