DOCSLIB.ORG

The United States Must Build More Men-Of-War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

26 THE SEATTLE SUNDAY, MAY R, 1900. THE UNITED STATES MUST BUILD MORE MEN-OF-WAR. Proposed Increase Through an Holland Torpedo Boat Purdue Expenditure of 5250.000.000 6y the Government (an Re Is None Too Great to main Under tfie Water Maintain the nation's lor Honrs complete- Place Amons tfie ly InvisioieDuriniS Powers. Attack. ft statement based on the nu- that the Holland ha* beet put. merical strength of ships, the chased by the government and |i T'nlted States navy occupies 11 vessel of I'ncle Sam's navy jn fourth place among the navies of gr>od and regrti'.ar standing, a trwh th« world, and authorities nOWinterest is taken in her hlstnrj- TROMthat If this country Is to maintain its characteristics. standing as a world power Its navy must The Holland is shaped like a sweet po- debate be largely Increased. In the recent tato. is R4 feet 4 inches I n* and 10 fe« j on the naval appropriation bill, Congress- Inches in diameter at the broadest part. man Loudensleger. of New Jersey, point- When erulslnir abott one-eighth of )?,j so ed out that never has thcr*- been great bulk would be above the surface, nnd Hit competition among the nations for for- would draw about eight feet of water, ghn eign commerce a« now, and foreign com- lan be wholly submerged and yet operate mere* rannot be maintained to any con- In a <ie:>th of twelve feet. siderable extent unless a nation is pre- Propulsion Is effected by a screw that pared to protect its interests against en- derives Its power from a gasoline engine argument, croachment. In clinching his when the boat is running at the surface. Congressman Loudenslagrr submitted fig- When she Is submerged the screw lj ures and tables, which are reproduced on WARSHIPS TO BE BUILT BY THE UNITED STATES, ILLUSTRATION SHOWING THE $250,000,000 ADDITION TO THE NAVY. driven by an e>etric motor and storage this page. battery. This tv-ittrry would be prevtouMy topic Fighters Sea," Speed in Speed in Speed in On the "Our of the charged bv the boat's own engines. Onj Iy-slles No. Type. Type. Rldney Graves Koon, In Wee&ly, Name and knots. No. Name and Type. knots. No. Name and knots. charge of the battery ought to enable her demonstrates that the fighting 1 Kearsarge, battleship 17 22 Des Moines, sheathed protected cruiser 17 ?42 Wilkes, torpedo boat 26.5 to run seventy-five miles under water. value of the American ships, due largely 2 Kentucky, battleship 17 23 Chattanooga, sheathed protected cruiser 17 43 Dahlgren, torpedo boat 30 When submerged her spe. 1 would not the adoption of the new high-powered to 3 Georgia, battleship 19 24 Galveston, sheathed protected cruiser 17 44 T. A. M. Craven, torpedo b0at...., 30 exceed four or five knots When cruising guns, is very evident. Not one of the she can travel a little faster. She has new Maine 4 New Jersey, battleship 19 25 Tacoma. sheathed protected cruiser 17 45 Chesapeake, training vessel for naval academy foreign ships approaches the made a speed of seven or eight knots on in this respect, and the N>w Jersey Is 5 Pennsylvania, battleship 19 26 Cleveland, sheathed protected cruiser 17 46 Bainbridge, torpedo boat ilestroyer 29 the surface, European 6 Illinois, battleship gunboat Barry, torpedo destroyer still further removed from 17' 27 Unnamed for lake service 47 boat 29 As originally designed, the Holland had standards. It may be of interest to note 7 Wisconsin, battleship 17 28 Stringham, torpedo boat 30 48 Chauncey, torpedo boat destroyer 29 three weapons. One was an expulsion that the Oregon's fighting power, comput- 8 Alabama, battleship 17 29 Goldsborough, torpedo boat 30 49 Dale, torpedo boat destroyer 28 tube of the same type that the ordinary ed on her condition when she fought at 9 Missouri, battleship 18 30 Bailey, torpedo boat 30 50 Decatur, torpedo boat destroyer 28 torpedo boat carries. This delivers th# Hantlago, may be represented by 21H.&56 10 Ohio, battleship Bagley, torpedo torpedo destroyer torpedo without any special violence. Tha foot-tons per minute, which 18 31 boat 28 51 Paul Jones, boat 29 has been In- battleship destroyer Whitehead projectile Is an automobile; or creased by the adoption of smokeless 11 Maine, 18 32 Barney, torpedo boat 28 52 Perry, torpedo boat 29 self-propelling affair, Plunger, torpedo it carries a tiny powder and the installation of six-inch 12 submarine boat 8 33 Blakely, torpedo boat 26 53 Preble, torpedo boat destroyer....: 29 screw and automatic sleeting apparatus, rapid-fire guns in place or her six-inch 13 West Virginia, armored cruiser 22 34 Be I.ong, torpedo boat 26 54 Stewart, torpedo boat destroyer 29 and takes care of itself when one* slow-Are guns, to 319.2JW. This Is far be- 14 Nebraska, armored cruiser 22 35 Nicholson, torpedo boat 26 55 Truxton, torpedo boat destroyer 30 launched. The Holland is planned to car- low the figure for any other ship men- 15 California, armored cruiser 22 36 Blddle, torpedo boat 28 56 Whipple, torpedo bo*t destroyer 30 ry three Whiteheads 12 feet long nnd II tioned by Mr. Koon, but it is only fair 16 Arkansas, monitor 12 37 O'Brien, torpedo boat 26 57 Worden, torpedo boat destroyer 30 Inches in diameter. One would be placad to remark that the bulk of the Orion's Connecticut, monitor In the expulsion tube ready for xervlo», 17 12 38 Shubrick, torpedo boat 26 58 Hopkins, torpedo boat destroyer 29 and others would be battery consists of heavy, slow-firing Florida, monitor 12 the arranged along- guns, capable of great penetration and 18 39 Stockton, torpedo boat 26 59 Hull, torpedo boat destroyer 29 side the tube within the boat. The tuba monitor Lawrence, execution, but not showing up To great 19 Wyoming, 12 40 Thornton, torpedo boat. 26 60 torpedo boat destroyer 30 opens out In front. advantage when it comes to a compari- 20 Albany, shoathed protected cruiser 20 41 Tingey, torpedo boat 26 61 Macdonough, torpedo boat destroyer 30 Beside* the ordinary rudder, a vertical son like the above. In all the ships the 21 Denver, sheathed protected cruiser 17 ?From Leslie's Weekly. plane to direct the boat's course to tha heaviest part of the energy may be trac- right or left, the Holland lias a second on*, ed to the six-inch rapid-fire guns, which extending In a horlxontal plane, nnd in- gtve, in the tended to alter the level. from three to five In Pres- times as heavy a discharge per minute Secretary I.cm*. and Incorporated in several parts of ht» body. Cook died In I heard Peterson say: "I'll be d d If The chief virtue of a submarine torpefo as message to congreiM, tfo the monster pieces heading the lists. ident M< Kfnley's NAVAL TONNAGE OF THE GREAT POWERS. an hour. I kneej down. If I've sol to die I'm going boat Is that she can render herself mors mttlenhlpe, but Includes threw dip Our now armored cruisers* will prove to contains no Joseph I*. Cook, private. Compar.y H, to standing up." Just then they be- completely Invisible than a vessel that cruisers, even larger than the \ gan tiring. pain my be the peem of any afloa't. and could at- armored i i *"n!Sßrf ] Ninth Infantry. Home at Hom.'sburg. I felt a great 1n )'?est, always stays on the surface. She could _ I Ercland. i France Russia. States. 'Jet many Italy. Japan. tack, with a high chance California cla*«. three protected cruisers Bunt- I'u. Two penetrating wounds in lit east and fell over. It seemed that somebody certainly deliver an attack by night with- of sufrees, any Columbia, | j , but the *llg"htly larger than the and j | made by Remington bullets'. Holo-wounda had struck me over the breast with a ball out detection, and It 1* even possible that mos-t powdWul battleship If, a» by Is reportfwi. the armor-belt twelve small gunboats, recommended 5M.83S 296, Ml ' 117.210 j (MM lIJ.SS9 1(8,588 31,971) on neck and logs. Died five days later. tnt. Then 1 henrd yelling nnd firing, and she could do so by day. The latter li is to be ten J*\u25a0 ' i i I Admiral Dewey for service In our new In- \u25a0y r 131.600 44 (WO 6V?16 ' 21.713 1T.203 21.560 N'orval. private, Company closet! my eyes when 1 «aw Brown altogether out question isy lncht*4 It will <> I 1 17.41 I I Edward A. n. that of the with thl'k. at once be seen to yet r 61. IV a sular possession* No action ha* been J. 181.185 125.8*8 11.977 .*39 \u25a0 .189 42.112 51.802 Twelfth Infantry. Heme at Gordon 'lty. had been killed nnd mutilated. I woke up other type of torpedo boat. Count, offer far more formidable resistance to n| ir ' 38.510 #1.063 11.397 13.5W 2.279 ! 23.778 Of taken by congress in the matter. In this 'J, " 8.401 Mo. through right groin, left thigh, again to see the colored soldiers about us. such tiny craft navigate inquisitive shell* than the of the n*w 80.080 43.328 41.300 51.884 12.001 None. 10.280 Shot cannot In rough Interesting to note what f ° light leg.
Recommended publications
  • Inventor Hollands Proposed New Semi-Submerged Torpedo Boat

    Inventor Hollands Proposed New Semi-Submerged Torpedo Boat

    THE CALL Sunday SAN EditionFRANCISCO, SUNDAY, APRIL 24, 1898. THE LATEST NAVALWONDERS FOR DESTROYING BATTLE-SHIPS from the coast, the water must be com- mistake on the part of the officer In INVENTOR HOLLANDS PROPOSED NEW SEMI-SUBMERGED TORPEDO BOAT. paratively smooth and clear, the tor- command may spoil everything and This new mari r be protected by being pedo must be discharged with absolute doom all on board to a terrible death. will sunk four feet under the surface of the water. The small exposed portion will he surrounded with accuracy. slightest [mentor Elolland declares that such a vessel will practically The breakdown in be irresistible and invulnerable because she will combine all the delicate machinery, the slightest i Continued on Page Twor.ty-alx: boat and a torpedo l-<.at destroyer, arid can also be used as a destroyer of torpedo boat destroyers. INVENTOR HOLLAND'S TWO NEW SEA FIGHTING MONSTERS, THE SUBMARINE TORPEDO BOAT AND THE SEMI-SUBMARINE TORPEDO BOAT. • HOLLAND has just Iboal will bo pimply rlddied and sawed Such a boat as this combines all the miles under the water, to riso and sink :into pieces bj rapid-fire ammunition. qualities ith another ma- of a torpedo-boat and a tor- at the will of her operators, and to dis- \u25a0 a Further, ;isubmerged armored torpedo- pedo-boat destroyer, and can also so her be charge a torpedo at a target. She pre- submerged torped boal will be able to get near as .id( stroyer of torpedo-boal de- target that by greatly reducing the stroyers.
  • Defeating the U-Boat Inventing Antisubmarine Warfare NEWPORT PAPERS

    Defeating the U-Boat Inventing Antisubmarine Warfare NEWPORT PAPERS

    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 36 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE WAR NAVAL Defeating the U-boat Inventing Antisubmarine Warfare NEWPORT PAPERS NEWPORT S NA N E V ES AV T AT A A A L L T T W W S S A A D D R R E E C C T T I I O O L N L N L L U U E E E E G G H H E E T T I I VIRIBU VOIRRIABU OR A S CT S CT MARI VI MARI VI 36 Jan S. Breemer Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen U.S. GOVERNMENT Cover OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE This perspective aerial view of Newport, Rhode Island, drawn and published by Galt & Hoy of New York, circa 1878, is found in the American Memory Online Map Collections: 1500–2003, of the Library of Congress Geography and Map Division, Washington, D.C. The map may be viewed at http://hdl.loc.gov/ loc.gmd/g3774n.pm008790. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. ISBN 978-1-884733-77-2 is for this U.S. Government Printing Office Official Edition only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Govern- ment Printing Office requests that any reprinted edi- tion clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The logo of the U.S. Naval War College (NWC), Newport, Rhode Island, authenticates Defeating the U- boat: Inventing Antisubmarine Warfare, by Jan S.
  • Round I: 1898 - the First Naval Law

    Round I: 1898 - the First Naval Law

    Chapter 1 Round I: 1898 - The First Naval Law General Briefing for round I The state of the nations After a series of diplomatic encounters and small wars orchestrated by Bismarck, Germany beat France in a decisive war in 1871, and exacted reparations; in that year, Germany became asingle, federal nation under a constitution written by Bismarck. There are three separate branches of government. The Presidency is held by the German Emperor (a job reserved for the King of Prussia). The Emperor has personal control of the armed forces. The Chancellor hasresponsibility for foreign policy, and appoints ministers with the Emperor’s consent. The Bundesrat represents the German princes. The Reichstag is elected. The Emperor can appoint or dismiss a chancellor; the Reichstag must approve, but cannot initiate legislation, nor can it appointordismiss ministers; the Emperor (with the approval of the Bundesrat) can dissolve theReichstag. The Reichstag approves the budget. In 1890, Wilhelm II — a great believer in personal rule by the Emperor, described as “not quite sane” by some observers and “like a balloon. If you do not hold fast to the string, you never know where he will be off to” by Bismarck — dismissed Bismarck (who also believed in personal rule, but by himself) as Chancellor and replaced him with a more malleable candidate. By the time of our game, Germany is growing very fast (see the graphs, which encapsulate the only figures I have). There are two popular visions of how Germany can grow further: either it must expand overseas by establishing colonies, which will provide raw material for German industry, or it must use its wealth to improve social conditions at home.
  • Patrol Torpedo Boats During World War II

    Patrol Torpedo Boats During World War II

    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall 12-15-2012 Firing Point: Patrol Torpedo Boats during World War II Joshua J. Schick University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Schick, Joshua J., "Firing Point: Patrol Torpedo Boats during World War II" (2012). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 1602. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1602 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Firing Point: Patrol Torpedo Boats during World War II A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By Joshua James Schick B.A. Louisiana State University, 2010 December, 2012 Acknowledgement I would like to thank my thesis committee comprised of Dr.
  • Cruel-Seas-Campaign-Pack.Pdf

    Cruel-Seas-Campaign-Pack.Pdf

    CAMPAIGN PACK 1 Introduction Table of Contents This is one of several campaign packs produced for the Warlord Games 75th Anniversary D-Day • Plywood Sleigh....................................3 Campaign. • Monitor Mayhem..................................5 Inside, you’ll find four unique scenarios written • Beach Assault......................................7 specially for the campaign. Each one presents a variety of different challenges for players, • Storm in a Teacup................................9 chronicling the actions of Axis and Allied coastal forces during the invasion of Normandy. Written & Edited By Plywood Sleigh follows a Vosper captain on his mission to recover a team of commandos from a Tom Mecredy Dutch beach while being menaced by an Photography & Graphics armoured S-Boat. Warlord Games Monitor Mayhem centres around the illustrious HMS Roberts - a Roberts-class Monitor Special Thanks engaged on bombardment duty off the Sword Beach. Richard Carlisle, Dan Hewitson, George Beach Assault tackles the kind of landing Lamb, Marcus Vine & John Stallard operations seen across Utah, Omaha, Juno, Gold and Sword beaches on 6th June. This product is not intended for use as part of any organised play or tournament Storm in a Teacup pits a flotilla of PT Boats scheme. It requires a copy of the Cruel against some marauding S-Boats against a back- Seas rulebook - any rules queries should drop of the worst storm in 40 years! be adjudicated using the book and common sense. 2 Plywood Sleigh 24th December 1943 A flash of red light flickered on the mist-shrouded Loitering just off the Dutch coast, a Royal Navy beach. From the bridge of his Vosper, Captain Stallard motor torpedo boat stands by for action.
  • A Serious Question, When Considering That a Tiny Torpedo Boat II 07Iid Destroy the Greatest Uarsjiip in a Moment

    A Serious Question, When Considering That a Tiny Torpedo Boat II 07Iid Destroy the Greatest Uarsjiip in a Moment

    Is the Battleship Doomed A Serious Question, When Considering That a Tiny Torpedo Boat II 07iId Destroy the Greatest UarsJiip in a Moment By WILLIAM G. FITZ-GERALD ffiSSSmmt'' firing a shot the eighteen thou¬ decker of a hundred and sand-ton British monster Dreadnought one guns. There are WITHOUThas made all the navies of the world courses seven different practically obsolete and sent them scurrying to for commissioned offi¬ copy her monstrous lines and five tremendous cers, four for warrant towers, each mounting a pair of twelve-inch rifles. officers, nine for artifi¬ Money is being poured out like water; yet there are cers, four for petty not a few authoritative voices raised in protest, and officers, and two for these call attention to the latest pattern of torpedo seamen France, in the discharged from submarine or torpedo boat. Im¬ person of her great tor¬ agine a missile shot from a tube, like a shell from a pedo expert Messimy, twelve-inch gun, only launched iti the sea, instead of suggests that a port directly through the air, at an enemy's ship, and shall be set aside ex¬ aimed with all of the big gun's precision. clusively for the con¬ It is a cigar shaped monster of shining steel, per¬ struction and repair of haps twenty feet long, weighing nearly a ton, alive torpedo boats. with the mechanism of one hundred and thirty As to ourselves, every horses comprised within the space of a woman's midshipman at Annap¬ 37 handbag.surely the uttermost limit of human in¬ olis is taught the details Jt About to Discharge a Torpedo.
  • British Destroyers at Jutland

    British Destroyers at Jutland

    BRITISH DESTROYERS AT JUTLAND British Destroyers at Jutland: Torpedo Tactics in Theory and Action1 JOHN BROOKS Independent Scholar Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article considers the theory behind British torpedo tactics in 1916 and evaluates the success of these in the three major torpedo actions at the Battle of Jutland. By considering the technical processes and difficulties of mounting torpedo attacks in 1916 the article challenges Arthur Marder’s claim that the destroyer actions at Jutland were ‘disastrously ineffective’. During the Battle of Jutland (31 May – 1 June 1916) there were three major torpedo attacks by British destroyers against lines of German capital ships. From 4.15pm, destroyers of the British Battle Cruiser Fleet (BCF) engaged the German Ist Scouting Group (ISG) and some of its accompanying destroyers. Both sides lost two destroyers while the action ended with the torpedoing of the German battlecruiser Seydlitz. After dark, from 11.30pm the British 4th Destroyer Flotilla (4DF) repeatedly attacked the battleships and light cruisers in the German van. The flotilla lost four destroyers with three more badly damaged; but, on the German side, two crippled light cruisers had to be scuttled, while the battleship Nassau and a destroyer were damaged. Later, as dawn broke at 2am, the British 12DF delivered an attack that blew up the German pre-dreadnought Pommern with the loss of all her crew.2 Of the attacks by the BCF’s destroyers (the 13DF and four boats of the 10DF), Sir Julian Corbett declared that: ‘The whole affair must ever stand as an exemplary piece of flotilla work in battle ….
  • Introductions to Heritage Assets: Ships and Boats: 1840 to 1950

    Introductions to Heritage Assets: Ships and Boats: 1840 to 1950

    Ships and Boats: 1840-1950 Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Many of these are what might be thought of as ‘new heritage’, that is they date from after the Second World War. This overview looks at ships and boats built after 1840. Principally drawing on archaeological, technological and historical sources, it describes vessels used on English inland and coastal waters and in the open sea. The evidence of wrecks and abandoned vessels is drawn on, as well as extant vessels. Also included is the early development of submarines. This guidance note has been written by Mark Dunkley and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed at HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ First published by English Heritage September 2012. This edition published by Historic England July 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. HistoricEngland.org.uk/advice/ Front cover I K Brunel’s SS Great Britain. © David Noton, used with permission of the
  • U.S.S. New Ironsides: the Seagoing Ironclad in the Union Navy

    U.S.S. New Ironsides: the Seagoing Ironclad in the Union Navy

    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Winter 1992 U.S.S. New Ironsides: The eS agoing Ironclad in the Union Navy William Howard Roberts Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, William H.. "U.S.S. New Ironsides: The eS agoing Ironclad in the Union Navy" (1992). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/mv9c-hp68 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/31 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U.S.S. NEW IRONSIDES: IHE SEAGOING IRONCLAD IN THE UNION NAVY by William Howard Roberts B.S. March 1973, Massachusetts Institute of Technology A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 20, 1992 Approvi L. Wilson (Director) Willard C. Frank. Jr. Patrick J.N«ollinsr^Roi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT U.S.S. NEW IRONSIDES: THE SEAGOING IRONCLAD IN THE UNION NAV7 William Howard Roberts Old Dominion University, 1992 Director: Dr. Harold L. Wilson Of the ironclads completed by the Union during the Civil War, only the U.S.S. New Ironsides was a seagoing, high-freeboard design.
  • Mystery Ships of World War I Hms Hyderabad

    Mystery Ships of World War I Hms Hyderabad

    The Naval Historical Society of Australia Inc. MYSTERY SHIPS OF WORLD WAR I HMS HYDERABAD M K Horsfall MONOGRAPH 171 Mystery Ships of World War I - HMS HYDERABAD M K Horsfall Monograph No. 171 BRITISH MYSTERY SHIPS OF WWI PREFACE I always felt honoured and fascinated by my maternal Grandfather, George Herbert Fluke’s, somewhat unusual life. Old enough to see Louis Bleriot land his aircraft in Britain on the first flight across the channel, attending the same school as Charlie Chaplin (although Chaplin was older) and as he moved into adulthood, he began his military career, firstly belonging to a London regiment of the British Territorials1 achieving the rank of Lance Corporal, then joining the Royal Navy as a regular in early 1914 and trained as a Cook, achieving the Petty Officer rank of Cook’s Mate. During WWI the Minesweeper HMS RODEAN he was serving on was sunk tied up alongside in Gibraltar Harbour by a Destroyer which had dragged its anchor during a storm. He then served on another Minesweeper HMS WHITBY ABBEY2 which was heavily engaged in the Gallipoli Campaign where his ship was sunk by Turkish shell fire from the shore. He then moved on to the Mystery Ship HMS HYDERABAD, about which a large part of this article is devoted. After WWI he served on HMS MEDWAY a destroyer which had been converted to survey work. The two sinkings he had received led to lung problems and his honourable discharge on medical ground. He was advised by his doctors to seek a drier climate than England and so emigrated to Australia with his family in 1926.
  • PT-305 Timeline of Events and Milestones

    PT-305 Timeline of Events and Milestones

    PT-305 Timeline of Events and Milestones March 30, 1943 – PT-305’s keel is laid down at the City Park Plant of Higgins Industries in New Orleans. May 27, 1943 – PT-305 is launched. November 10, 1943 – PT-305, along with PT-302 through PT-313, is assigned to Motor Torpedo Boat Squadron 22 (Ron 22). Ron 22 is commissioned under the command of LCDR Richard J. Dressling and assigned to the Mediterranean. December 8, 1943 – PT-305 is commissioned into the US Navy. June 18, 1944 – Boats from Ron 22 participate in the Invasion of Elba. July 18, 1944 –PT-305 sinks a German Flak lighter of Palamaria Island, Italy. August 15, 1944 – Ron 22 is part of Operation Dragoon, the invasion of Southern France. September 15, 1944 – PT-305 sinks a German F-lighter off Point Del Mesco, Italy. April 24, 1945 – PT-305 sinks an Italian MAS boat off Cape Della Arma, Italy. Late April 1945 – Ron 22 is returned to the United States to be overhauled in preparation for deployment to the Pacific. The war, however, ends while the squadron is still in New York Harbor. November 15, 1945 – The squadron is decommissioned, still under the command of LCDR Richard J. Dressling. June 18, 1948 – PT-305 is sold for $10. After stints as a tour boat in New York City and a fishing charter, PT- 305 is eventually modified for work as an oyster boat in Chesapeake Bay. To save on fuel, the three Packard engines—which required 100 octane aviation gasoline to operate—are removed and replaced with two diesel engines.
  • Palmetto Navy: Ironclad Construction and the Naval Defense of Charleston During the Civil War

    Palmetto Navy: Ironclad Construction and the Naval Defense of Charleston During the Civil War

    Palmetto Navy: Ironclad Construction and the Naval Defense of Charleston During the Civil War by Charles Wexler A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 09, 2015 Keywords: history, civil war, Charleston, navy, industry, ironclads Copyright 2015 by Charles Wexler Approved by Kenneth Noe, Chair, Professor of History Angela Lakwete, Associate Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Randall Holmes, Professor of Mathematics and Statistics Abstract This dissertation traces the creation and operation of the Charleston Naval Squadron in the Civil War through a look at the different ships and construction strategies implemented within Charleston Harbor. Under the direction of Stephen Mallory, the Confederate Navy pursued armored warships to defend local ports. Charleston shipyards completed four ironclads and started two others. The Confederate Navy did not enjoy a monopoly on maritime procurement, however. Navy shipwrights, army engineers, South Carolina government officials, the Charleston Daily Courier, independent contractors, and private citizens all participated in the shipbuilding process. These different entities promoted differing designs and concepts that included shot-proof steamers, lightly armored torpedo boats, and the submersible Hunley. Confederate naval construction in Charleston ultimately suffered from two critical problems: a congested procurement pipeline and an increasing resource scarcity, particularly of iron plate. The return of Gen. Pierre G. T. Beauregard in September 1862 contributed towards both problems when he championed an army-designed torpedo boat at the expense of additional ironclads. Regardless of what local shipwrights produced the sailors of the Charleston Squadron provided the best hope for success against the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron.