HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT INTERSTATE 710 CORRIDOR PROJECT BETWEEN OCEAN BOULEVARD AND THE STATE ROUTE 60 INTERCHANGE 07-LA-710 PM 4.9/24.9 EA 249900 E-FIS 0700000443 WBS ID: 165.20.10

Prepared for

®Metro

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

February 2012

Prepared by: LS A LSA Ass0<:iat es, Inc. 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 Sklte of Cal1forriia Oepartmen1 of Transpor!ali01\ HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

1. UNDERTAKING DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION District Countv Route Post Miles Unit I E-FIS Project Number Phase 7 LA 710 4.9/24.9 I 0700000443 £isb-JCI ,=- ..,,,,, ~rm.f Ab Lam,,, tfRS.~M ,,,,.,

(For Local Assistance oroieds off the h/nhwav svstem, use headers ,n italics} Proiect Description: I The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), the Gateway Cities Council of Go~ernments (GCCOG), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), lhe Ports of Los Angeles (POLA) and Long Beach (POLB), and the Interstate 5 Join! Powers Authority (l-5 JPA), are collectively known as the Interstate 710 (1-710) Corridor Project Funding Partners. These agencies are collectively funding the preparation of preliminary engineering and environmental documenlat1on for the proposed 1-710 Corridor Project to evaluate improvements along the 1-710 Corridor from Ocean Blvd. in the city of Long Beach to State Route 60 (SR~60) (Historic Property Survey Report [HPSR], Attachment A, Maps 1-4). The proposed alternatives for this project include Alternative 1 (No Build Alternative), Alternative 5A (Freeway Widening up to 10 General-Purpose Lanes), Alternative 6A (10 General Purpose Lanes plus a Four~ Lane Freight Corridor), Alternative 6B (10 General Purpose Lanes plus a Zero-Emissions Four-Lane Freight Corridor). and Alternative 6C (10 General Purpose Lanes plus a Zero-Emissions Four-Lane Freight Corridor tolled), Alternative 5A and 6A-6C also include improvements to 42 local arterial intersections within the 1-710 Corridor Project Study Area. A detailed project description is included in the Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), Attachment C.

I 2. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project was established in consultation wrth Noah M. Stewart, Caltrans PQS Architectural History; and Abdi Saghaft, Caltrans Project Manager, on December 20, 2011 The APE maps are located in Attachment A of this HPSR.

The 1-710 Corridor Project's APE was delineated to include all resources that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by the 1-710 Corridor Project. The areas of direct effects include the areas where physical impacts will occur. These are generally limited to the proposed and existing rights-of­ way, as well as areas where utilities will be relocated, and include the horizontal and vertical limits {ranging from a maximum height of 100 feet [ft] [freight corridor construction] la a maximum depth of 150 fl [drilling for borings and bridge piles]) associated with ground-disturbing activities. The areas of indirect effects extend beyond those of the direct effects and incorporate areas that may be indirectly affected by visual. noise, or other effects- The areas of indirect effects generally Include all properties that are adjacent to the proposed right-of~way unless they are undeveloped. In most cases, the APE includes only the properties adjacent to the proposed right~of-way and/or temporary construction easements (TCEs), but additional parcels may be included where there are proposed new bridges, bridges that are being widened or replaced. or construction of new elevated features such as ramps and the freight corridor in Alternatives 6A-6C. Exceptions include properties that are buffered by topographic features, large parking and/or landscaped areas, or buildings on other properties The APE extends around the entirety of those parcels where the built environment will be indirectly affected. The vertical APE includes the maximum anticipated depth of ground disturbing activities. which is expected to be a maximum of 150 ft at bridge pile locations.

---·· . ···------For the Federal undertaking described in Part 1: To minimi2:e redundancy and paperwork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Officer, and in the spirit intended under the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (U.S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideration under California Environmental OLJality Act Guidelines Section §15064.S(a) and as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 {a)(b) and (d).

[HPSR form· 07·22·10] Page 1 ~l"'" nl C.dH~•'1!,, j\""i"~~•, '[ '•'""f'"''a,i,;" ~"ii 11,H,.inK Alo(«"~ llq,adm,•01 c.l Tr•n•p~r,~d"" HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

3. CONSULTING PARTIES I PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ~ Local Governmenl (Head of local government, Preservation Office/ Planning Department) • City of Bell, Planning Department (Dennis Tarango, Director of Building & Planning, 6330 Pine Ave .• Bell, CA 90201 ). • City of Bell Gardens, Community Development and Planning Division (Carmen Morales, Interim Community Development Director, 7100 S. Garfield Ave_, Bell Gardens, CA 90201 ). • City of Sell Gardens, Cultural Heritage Board (Marta Solano, 7100 S. Garfield Ave., Bell Gardens, CA 90201 ). • City of Carson. Economic Development and Planning Division (Sheri Repp-Loadsman, Planning Manager, 701 E. Carson St, Carson, CA 90745). • City of Commerce, Community Development and Planning Division (Robert Zarrilli, Director, 2535 Commerce Wy., Commerce, CA 90040). .. Cily of Compton, Planning and Economic Development, Planning Division (Gay K. Morris, Interim Planning Director, 205 S. Willowbrook Ave., Compton, CA 90220). .. Cily of Lynwood. Development Services Department (Karen Figueredo, Planning Assistant. 11330 13ullis Rd., Lynwood, CA 90262). .. City of Monterey Park, Development Services Department, Planning Division (Jim Basham, Planning Manager, 320 W. Newmark Ave., Monterey Park, CA 91754). • City of Monterey Park, Historic Heritage Commission (Harry Panagiotes, 320 W. Newmark Ave., Monterey Park, CA 91754). • City of Paramount. Community Development (Joe Perez, Community Development Director, 16400 Colorado Ave., Paramount, CA 90723). • City of South Gate, Community Development and Redevelopment Planning Division (Steve Lefever, Director of Community Development, 8650 California Ave .. South Gate. CA 90280). • City of Vernon, Community Services Planning Division (Sergio Canales. Planning Assistant. 4305 Santa Fe Ave., Vernon. CA 90058). • County of Los Angeles, Regional Planning Department (Jon Sanabria, Acting Director of Planning, 320 W. Temple SI.. 13th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012). • City of Long Beach, Development Services and Planning Bureau (Lynette Ferenczy, 333 W. Ocean Blvd., 41h Floor, Long 13each, CA 90802). For more detailed information, refer to Attachment C, Historical Resources Evaluation Report; and Attachment F, Historical Consultation.

~ The following Native American tribes, groups, and individuals were contacted via a letter sent by certified mail on March 23, 2009, and again by either follow up email or telephone call between April 3 and April 10, 2009, depending on whether contact was successful: • LA City/County Nati'te American Indian Community, Ron Andrade, Director; Mr. Andrade will defer to Anthony Morales. Please see below. " Gabrielino Tongva Council/Gabrlelfno Tongva Nation, Sam Dunlap, Tribal Secretary: no response received_ .. Ti'At Society, Cindi Alvitre; Ms. Al\litre recommends having mitigalion measures in place in tho event of cultural resources discoveries, and would like to be notified of any discoveries. • Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council: Robert Dorame, Tribal Chair/Cultural Resources; Mr. Dorame would like to be notified of any cultural resources discoveries. • Tongva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation, John Tommy Rosas; Mr. Rosas responded by email to request full Section 106 consult,:ition and copies of all project related documents. He also stated his opposition to the project as having the potential lo have "many negative Impacts.'· For the Federal undertaking described 1n Part 1: Ta minimize redundancy and paperv.·ork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preser,,ration Officer, and in the spirit intended under ttie federal Paperwork R1?duct1on Act (U.S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideratfon under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section §15064.5{a) and. as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 (a)(b) and (d).

[HPSR form, 01·22-10] Page 2 .~hi<· ,,f i'alil'"~";~ llu•in~•~, l ~-.,,~,,,.~.;.," 4,.,1 ll"""'"ll' :\~t·lln lhp~rtm~t1t ,,f 'I r~""l"•chdo1c, HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

, Gabrielenoffongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Anthony Morales, Chairperson; Mr. Morales responded by telephone to state that he considers the area to be sensitive for cultural resources. He recommended monitoring by both a Native American and archaeologist during all ground-disturbing activities. He would also like to be notified of any cultural resources discoveries.

Due to changes to the APE, the above individuals were contacted again by letter dated June 17, 2011. Mr. Morales responded by telephone on June 21, 2011, to state that the gist of his comments remain the same. Mr. Dunlap responded to say that he has no specific concerns. Follow up emails were sent to the remaining Native American contacts on July 6 and July 12, 2011. Mr. Rosas responded by email on July 12, 2011, to say that he has many concerns and he hopes they can be addressed. No further responses were received.

In July 2011, the project design was updated to include 35 intersections that were added to 1he APE_ Three of these were later removed and 10 new intersections added in September 2011 for a total of 42 intersections added to the APE. Because 31 of the 35 intersections added in July 2011 are well oulside of the APE that had lhus far been referenced for consullat1on. a new SLF was requested on July 12, 2011. The NAHC responded on July 12, 2011, to state that the SLF did not identify any Native American cultural resources at any of the 31 locations. A new 11st of Native American contacts W

Letters regarding the intersections were sent to all nine parties on July 15, 2011. The two letters from the previous consultation efforts were included for the three new consulting parties so that they would have all of the Information necessary to comment.

No initial responses were received from the nine consulting parties. Follow up attempts to contact the individuals were made by telephone and email between July 25 and 29, 2011.

T1NO responses were received as a result. In a phone call on July 26, 2011, Anthony Morales stated that, as he has said previously, the 1-710 served as an ancient travel corridor connecting the ocean and the interior, and also the Los Angeles River. He considers the entire area to be very sensitive for cultural resources due to this. Also, many of the neighborhoods in the project were built prior to environmental laws being enacted, and there would not be reports or other written evidence regarding cultural resources that could be disturbed. He cited the Alameda Corridor as l'.ln example because many resources were exposed during construction for that proJect. He feels that 1,1igilance is necessary so that unknown resources are not impacted, and suggests spot-check monitoring by a Native American and a:n archaeologist

Sam Dunlap responded by email on July 28. 2011, to say that he would like lo talk about this aspect of the project A detailed voicemail that included the results of the records search was left for Mr_ Dunlap on July 29, 2011. No further response has been received.

Andrew Salas, Gabrleleno Band of Mission Indians, responded by email on August 3, 2011, to say that the proposed project is within aver~• culturally sensitive area that their people once inhabited. Numerous Native American village sites were located in this area due to the proximity of the nearby river and associated food sources. They are dedicated to protecting and preserving their history, and they are requesting that a Native American monitor from their group be present during all ground-disturbing activities.

For the Federal undert1;1kir'lg described in Part 1 · To minimize redundancy and paperwork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Officer, and ir'l the spirit intended under the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (U.S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideration under California Environmental Quality Acl Guidelines Section §15064 5(a) and, as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 (a){b) and (d).

[HPSR form: 07-22-1C] Page 3 .-.u,~ «r f:,li{»ro,iA 11,.,;,..,. ·1·~•"'"P""'"ti"r. ai.,I 11,.u,i,1;; A~""J Dq,,..-1,,,,•nt <>f I ra»,1.,,r1.,1;.," HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

Letters regarding 10 additional existing intersections to be modified were sent to all nine groups on September 27, 2011. Anthony Morales responded on October 12. 2011, to stale that he had no changes to his earlier comments. No other responses have been received to date (October 14, 2011 ).

For additional details of the Native American consultation. please see Attachment E of this HPSR. ~ Native American Heritage Commission • A Sacred Lands File (SLF) search was requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in a letter dated August 5, 2008. The NAHC responded on August 5, 2008 to advise that the results of the SLF search did indicate the presence af Native American cultural resources within areas of the project shown on the South Gate, California, Whittier, California, and Torrance, California USGS quadrangle areas of the project, The response included a list of six individuals/groups that the NAHC recommended be contacted for information regarding cultural resources that could be affected by the project The NAHC specifically recommended contacting Anthony Morales, Gabrielenorrongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and Cindi Alvitre. Ti'At Society, • In a letter dated July 12, 2011, the NAHC was contacted again lo request a SLF search for 31 of the 42 intersections that had been added lo the APE ;,;ind were not covered by the initial research. The NAHC responded on July 12, 2011, to state that Native American cultural resources were not identified at the locations provided. The new list provided by the NAHC contained the original six individuals/groups contacted, and an additional three Native American contacts,

~ Local Historical Society/ Historic Preservation Group (al.so if applicable, cfty archives, etc.) • Belttlower Heritage Society (16601 Civic Center Dr., Bellflower, CA 90706): ,. Historical Society of Long Beach (Julie Bartolotto, Executive Director, 4260 Atlantic Ave., Long Beach. CA 90807); • Historical Society of Monterey Park {781 S. Orange Ave_, Monterey Park. CA 91754); • Historical Society of Southern California (Post Office Box 93487, Pasadena, CA 91120); • Long Beach Heritage (Mary Kay Knouage, Executive Director, Post Office Box 92521, Long Beach, CA 90809); • Los Angeles Conservancy (Mike Buhler, Director of Advocacy, 523 W. 6th St., Ste. 826, Los Angeles, CA 90014).

For more detailed information refer to Attachment C, Historical Resources Evaluation Report, and Attachment F, Historical Consultation.

~ Public Information Meetings (list locations, dates below and attach copies of notices) Public participation meetings have been held with Local Advisory Committees (LACs), Subject Working Groups, and a Corridor Advisory Committee on an ongoing basis since the inception of the 1~710 Corridor Project. The LACs are part of an extensive community participation framework being managed by Metro and GCCOG for the 1-710 Corridor Project. The LACs were appointed by the local city council/county supervisor and provide an ongoing forum for citizen involvement at the community level. The chairs of the LACs also serve on the Corridor Advisory Committee (CAC) for the 1-710 Corridor Project, which reports to the Project Committee Key issues discussed included, but were not limited to: air quality impacts, noise impacts, aesthetics, community impacts, environmental justice, alternatives. and public transporto:ition. No concerns have been expressed regarding cultural resources.

- ·--~~~~~ For the Federal undertaking described in Part 1: To minimize redundancy and paperwork for the California Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Officer, and in the spirit intended under the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (U_S.C. 44 Chapter 35), this document also satisfies consideration under California Enviri:mmental Ouoility Act Guidelines Section §15064.S(a) and, as appropriate, Public Resources Code §5024 (a)(b) and (d).

(H::,SR form· 07-22-10] Page 4 -~t•« <>f t:aHhn•ni~ lhuiJ>n~, J, • .,,,JlrUdot1 HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

4. SUMMARY OF IDENTIFICATION EFFORTS

National Register of Historic Places Month & Year: 1979-2002 & supplements California Register of Historical Resources Year: 1992 & supplemental information to date California Inventory of Historic Resources Year: 1976 California Historical Landmarks Year: 1995 & supplemental information to date California Points of Historical Interest Year: 1992 & supplemental information to date State Historic Resources Commission Year: 1980-present, minutes from quarterly meetings Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory Year: 2006 & supplemental information to date Archaeological Site Records [List names of !nstitutlans & date below] • A records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), California State University, Fullerton, was conducted on May 7, 2009. • Supplemental records searches a.t the SCCIC, California State University, Fullerton, were conducted on July 14. September 21, and October 3, 2011. The purpose of the supplemental records searches was to examine the locations of 40 of 42 arterial intersections that are now included in the 1-710 project but were not covered by the 2009 records search. The other two additional arterial intersections that are now included in the project were covered by the 2009 records search. ,K Other sources consulted {e.g., historical societies, city archives, etc. List names and dates below] ~ • Refer lo Section 3 above. ~ Results: (provide a brief svmma,y of records search and research results, as well as irtventoty findings) May 2009 Results for the 1-710 Corridor APE Eight historic cultural resources (19~150348, 19-178699, 19-186110, 19-186112, 19-186774, 19~186804, 19·187753, and 19-187942) were identified within 0.125 mile of the 1-710 APE, three of which (19-186110, 19-186112, and 19-186804) are plotted crossing the horizontal extent of the APE.

• Site 19-186110 is 21 portion of the UP Railroad (formerly the Southern Pacific Railrosd). The resource was previously found eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). • Sile 19-186112 is also a portion of the UP Railroad. This resource was previously found eligible for the National Register. • Site 19-186804.130-176663 is a portion of the BNSF (formerly the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe [ATSF] Railway). This site was previously found ineligible for the National Register. • A 40-mile segment of the Boulder Dam-Los Angeles 287.5,V Transmission Line that was constructed from 1936-1937 was found eligible for the National Register under Criteria A and C in 2008 (record pro1Jided by Caltrans District 7 staff). • Site 19-187854 (Map Reference No. 183) an industrial building that was previously evaluated as ineligible for Hie National Register by consensus through the Section 106 process {status code 6Y), but had nol been evaluated for the California Register or local listing. One archaeological site (19-000693) has been identified within 0.125 mile of the APE. The site is plotted approximately 300 feet east of the APE on an elevated landform relative to the APE. Site 19~000693 was described in 1974 as being landscaped and developed but containing midden visible around a tennis court and in flower beds and other areas. A large number of Native American burials were reportedly exposed in 1906 during construction of the City of Long Beach's Drake Park. The National Register lists five properties within 0.125 mile of the APE, none of which are within the APE. The California Register of Historical Resources llsts 84 properties within 0.125 mile of the

[HPSR form: 07-22·10] Page 5 /,u1c ul CalH,;,rr>i,, I\,.,;.,,.•• , l',an,pun•ti.,n and ll""'lni: i\~~n•r lhpArtm~nl ~f ·1 ~'"'l'"~rnti"" HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

APE, none of which are within the APE, The California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, and City of Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monuments listings list no properties within 0.125 mile of the APE. The Historic Resources Inventory lists 301 properties that have been evaluated for historical significance within 0.125 mile of the APE, none of which are within the APE. Eightywtwo studies have been conducted within 0.125 mile of the APE, 48 of which include portions of the APE. Approximately 60 percent of the APE has been previously examined for cultural resources. July, September, and October, 2011, Results for 40 Arterial Intersections APEs Supplemental records searches were conducted for 40 of the 42 intersections since two of the intersections were included in the research for the original APE. Fifteen historic cultural resources (19-150349, 19-150363, 19~150364, 19-180181, 19-180783, 19-186110 [also identified in initial search].19-186868, 19-187127, 19-187128, 19-187131, 19-187187, 19-187218, 19-187854, 19- 188180, and 19-188196) were identified within 0.125 mile of 12 of the 40 arterial intersections examined in the supplemental records searches, Of lhe 15 resources, one (19-186110) is plotted within the APE of five intersedions (Nos. 52, 60, 62, 63, and 68) As previously described, this resource is a portion of the UP Railroad (formerly the Southern Pacific Railroad). One other resource (19-187854) is plotted within the APE of intersection No. 41. This resource is an industrial building that was evaluated as ineligible for the ~Jational Register by consensus through the Sectlon 106 process (status code 6Y), but has not been evaluated for the California Register or local listing. Eight archaeological resources (19-000694, '19,-002839, 19-002645, 19-002859, 19-002660, 19- 002863, 19~002870, and 19-003063) have been identified within 0.125 mile of 4 of the 40 arterial intersections. Of the eight, two (19-002859 and 19-3063) are plotted within the APE of intersection No, 68 and 25 respectively. • Site 19-002859 consists of two parallel segments of vitrified clay utility conduit located within the APE. The resource meets the criteria for exemption under Property Type 1 as defined in the Section 106 PA, Attachment 4. • Site 19-003063 is described as a wood box culvert housing at least one circa 1920s abandoned oil pipeline. The site was recorded during archaeological construction monitoring of the Alameda Corridor project and the portion within the Corridor was subsequently destroyed. The resource meets the criteria for exemption under Property Type 1 as defined in lhe Section 106 PA, Attachment 4. The National Register lists one property within 0.125 mile of the APE, but 1t is not within the APE. The California Register of Historical Resources lists two properties within 0.125 mile of the APE, neither of which is within the APE. The California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, and City of Los Angeles Hislorlc-Cultural Monuments listings list no properties within 0.125 mile of the APE. The Historic Resources Inventory lists 141 properties within 0.125 mile of the APE, none of which are within the APE. Sixty-four studies have been conducted within 0. 125 mile of the 40 arterial intersections, 15 of which include the APE of 7 intersections (Nos. 13, 14, 16, 18, 25, 63, and 106).

A review of locally listed properties within the project vicinity revealed that one property is currently listed on the South Gate historic register.

• The South Gate Library and tile mosaic (Map Reference No. 158) has a status code of 5B1,

- (HPSR farm: 07-22·10] Page6 Ch~« <>f c~lih,11i,, llu~1n,•••• 'J'r,'1>.•p.,,1_." ,,..J llol!,in,: A)(<'1'ty lh-1'a,om,·n1 ,,J l'ca,up»c<~•""' HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

5. PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED 2S Andrea Galvin, a consultant architectural historian who meets the PQS Standards in the Section 106 Programmatic Agreement (PA). Attachment 1, as a Principal Architectural Historian, has determined 1hat the only other properties present within the APE meet the criteria for Attachment 4 of the Section 106 PA (Properties Exempt from Evaluation). ,K Bridges listed :as Category 5 in the Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory are present within the APE. Appropriale pages frorn the Callrans Historic Bridge Inventory are attached. X Properties previously determined not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places are present within lhe Project APE. (include date of determination): • In 2002 site 19-186804/30-176663, a portion of the BNSF (formerly the ATSF) railroad, was found ineligible for the National Register. • Site 19-187854 is an industrial building that was previously evaluated as ineligible for the National Register by consensus through the Section 106 process (status code 6Y). ! As assigned by FHWA, Caltrans has determined the following properties within the ProJect APE are not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places: .. 200 properties. Refer to Attachment C, the Historical Resources Evaluation Report, (tables on pages 33-41) for a full listing of properties. !{ Properties previously listed or determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places are present within the Project APE. (Include date of /!sting or determination): , In 1999 site 19-186110/:m-176630, a portion of the UP Railroad (formerly the Southern Pacific Railroad), was found eligible for the National Register, • In 1999, site 19-186112, also a portion of the UP Railroad, was found eligible for the National Register. • The Boulder DamwLos Angeles 2B7.5kV Transmission Une was evaluated by the Bureau of Land Management in 2000. SHPO formally concurred in a letter dated June 22, 2000 (attached to DPR form in the HRER, Appendix A). X As assigned by FHWA, Caltrans has determined the following properties within the Project APE are ellgible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places: , APE Map Reference Number 71, APN 7301-001-001, 4502 E. Alondra Blvd,, Compton

L :: : : ~ ~l~j ?F ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION X Project Vicinity, Location, and APE Maps (Attachment A) X California Historic Bridge Inventory Sheets (Attachment B} X Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER) (Attachment C) • Prepared by Andrea Galvin, Galvin Preservation Associates, Inc. February 2012

~ Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) (Attachment D) • Prepared by Phil Fulton, LSA Associates, Inc. February 2012 ,K Other (Specify be.low) , Native American Consultation (Attachment E) • Historical Consultation (Attachment F)

! 7. HPSR to File X Not applicable.

[HPSR form: 07-22-1C] Page 7 ~l•h or Calilornh lh••ilu-. lran•r<>•Uthin and llou,in~ A~"""t Dep~r•nHn( ol -,~"""l'"ru1i<1n HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

I 8. HPSR to SHPO ~ As assigned by FHWA, Caltrans has determined that there are properties evaluated as a result of the project that are not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places within the Project APE. Under Section 106 PA Stipulation VIILC, Caltrans requests SHPO's concurrence in this determination.

~ As assigned by FHWA, Caltrans has determined that there are properties evaluated as a result of the project that are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places within the Project APE. Under Section 106 PA Stipulation VIII.C, Caltrans requests SHPO's concurrence In this determination.

9. Findings for State-Owned Properties

~ Caltrans has evaluated and determined that the following State~owned buildings and structures within the Project APE do NOT meet National Register and/or California Historical Landmark eligibility criteria. • 53~0836 East Walker Underpass (UP) • 53-0832 South Gate UP • 53--0816 Dominguez St. UP • 53 1170 Standard Oil Pipeline Overcrossing

10. CE:QA IMPACT FINDINGS K Caltrans, pursuant lo CEQA Guidelines §15064.S(a), has determined that the following resources do NOT meet National Register criteria but ARE historical resources for purposes of CEQA because they: are listed in the California Register or were determined eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission [§15064.5(a)(1 )], are included In a local register or identified as significant in a local survey meeting OHP standards [§15064.5(2)], or Caltrans, as the lead agency, has determined that they meet the criteria for listing in the California Register (§15064.5(a)(3) - (4)]: • APE Map Reference Number 158, APN 6210-017-909, 8660 California Ave., South Gate ~ Caltrans has determined a finding of no impact is appropriate because there are no historical resources within the Project Area limits, or there are no impacts to historical resource(s), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(b)(3).

11. HPSR PREPARATION AND DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

Prepared by (sign on line)'. 01slr1ct Caltrans PQS: PQS level and discipline] Date Prepared by: (sign on /mt)

Feb. 3, 2012 Consultant/ discipline: Andrea Ga/v[n, Principal Architectural Historian Date Affiliation Galvin Preservation As.sociates 231 California St El Segundo, CA 90245

[HPSR form: 07-22-10] Page 8 Su1t •' C1UferftU 81ninu1. T••·•up11r11tian aiu! lioudft( AC" n.c-, 0,;p,•roa••• of Tr•••porhtlon HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

Revieweo for approval by: /sign on ffno) Z? U1~ ~N~"J!r::-:---l,,,~~---4.~---n,z; District 7 Cultrons POS Oata dlsclpline/level: A rtJ/ Historian Approved by; (s/Qn en fin&) -~tto 311&12.. Olsl1et 7 EBC : , Office Chief Oate la/ StU(l/1/S, Cultural Branch

IH?SR ro,m 01-22.101 Page 9 ,¼""" or (:~l,f.,rnio l.h,$iocsa, ·1 r~lUf"'"••i->n ~,.J ll"»~i,",; A,:e"q 11,r~~,m~r,i c.f "\ ,.d,Hl"'~••1i,,,. HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT

ATTACHMENT A

MAPS Map 1: Project Vicinity Map 2: Project Location Map 3: Area of Potential Effects

- ··---.. -·-· [HPSR form; 07-22-10] San 8crnudiro CouOI)'

1,EGBND MI\P I D Project L.ocu1ii.rn Pill: Ill.I IIIH{ATIV~ mv,n

1-7 /0 C'1m•id1J1' l'mjec, II I () (}J./.A,7/0, PM ,f.YIU.9 l'.A 2499()() l' rojc~• Vicinil y MUJ) sot l({'h I UM {!IJCMJ I 1l MS(l}OIA\l,ll\\(_·1111111 111\!\.. f J 'ff'l..V1c11,1ty M l•~-!1'¥1 (Ol li! I t ._. '- I MAP 2 Shci:.1 I or II l'l~l•- IW.I lllE•l~1\TIVH Olli\l' f

1-710 Con /,Jr,,• Pm}ert p jcct Ll11:n1ion Mnp ro,O'H i\-7 10 l'M 4.9124.9 • Ill\ '.!A~'lOO LEGEND MAl' 2 SlT ~cl 2 of 11 CJ Projm Limit, l' IU • l)JII l lll-lu\TIVI l}JW I

l0 710 Crm-/dor Pmje<·J Projec1 Loca, ion Map 11111 Ol-1, \ ,7111• l'M 4.91211.9 SOllkt 'fT l~~(IS 1 1'0ti.ld I ONO llll,l\fll ('II I) SC•\ 1·11 O"TI ••~ t), li(.)S ANnl l~l1S t'gt) li,\249900 l:\l1J.c;S0801A\01)'1:'~ ll ,1n1M fltll'~• I» ·-\lq, ,md 1~'2 \11 1) •

,,

-,,,Ourl • :. :~•/ ,

·.t ~·::'' 't: r.; ...: \ £. , :J;J. • •••C :

,, ~ ,-tr,• '1± n , '---,.,1.-,.a.e,'"~ :·l , f ~ f lit Iii ,,,. I ~ I ,. '••ic • 1: ,, ' ,. iJ~~ • 'I • • LEOB\ID M,\P l Sh~llof ll Cl PmJocl Llinh!' l'Rt:,.t)LI llll'lt1\'rlVI' llH Al"I' $ /.7J O Corl'/tlor f'm)crt • 1,,11 hl+ Project l.ocmhm Mup II I • 07 1,1\-710 P~U.9/l,1.9 SOllkCI ' ~•so~ 7 ,Ii' Q,11111 l..(»NO lltil\C:H ('lll ). smm-c Cli\11! ( 11). LOS ANCIULl!S ('IJl l EA24WUO I \lt1Ct.i63i)IA\t1L'rl' 11 111111!\Al'll.lV<'LI oc_M•p,n~ (O/'}.J/ 11) ......

_, " ~--1 • --f'I Lf " "1~::,:w111111a11-.1,,:r, ". , :., ·+ "~ :w.,... . -~~,~ ~ '-'~:., I ' I•. ••.. . --~.... . 0 - -.--.~=··;JF,.;Mnt:-:"'~:2.1.. ~ol:... ,. !f

lQJI.G qrArH AI RPO~f r )CN()M(R'IY FICLO) ~ I~ , ■ 'lJ, in~ f!C 'Jlt " ~­ ... . tr \ ii i ~ - ., .·

MAP 2 Sheet d ,,( 11

l'IU , l>i'I llll'ICl\'I IV I 11ICI\VI

/.'JfO Ct>r1·{t!m· P,r,jcc, Pl'O,jccl Location Map "ii l!I 01 1-"~1 ICJ• PM ,t.9/2d.9 SOI 9((1] •~os 1 \' Ql't;I. I._Ot'-KJ llP.,\<'11 f'"I ~. ~!).!"11 1(1A111 ,t'ltl). Lfl~ AMlH..,PS 1'11 IJ e,, 2i11Jv00 li'il,~M0IA\(11~\C\1h1• 4M l'l·_1'1,)j_lJ 1C_,\ h1i,111.11I t,i'l VI I> MAP 2

1'10' IJf,1 lllH~,, nvr, 1)RAFr

1-710 Corridor Projerr Project Location Mn~ h?-t A- 71 11• PM 4 9(~::.. v J..J\24-,,.m,, ---:..~ <.,--,. ~;:=:-=1-',.;.,!.;:~~~a.!:;...... r= -=..,..,, -=..... :1t-:'": 1,i,1·:u ,i:'[~~-·,..,.,;.,;=:--=

:~-.-,-.,'1 :----. ) ~' :I - "i' •-.:,·.:.:··,n.·-.....: ---

_.,,_.,_..,~ •IO!WOO " ' .1,~ " 1

• ~

""• r..- .., ... ~. ~-- :• •: u ,., I •; l.l!OliND M/\P2 Sh"' fof II □ P,ujcc:1 l.irllh• l~E-IJl•I Ill! R/\l IVI IJR,\IT

1-710 Co,ddor Pn,j,,,, " llhl , Project l.ocation Map rnn· 07~LA•710• PM ti 9/2.(U) SOl.lltCl!! IJSOS H ' ~ lid. LbN

/. 710 Cm·1·lt!or Jl mjt•t·/ " '" Projcc1Loca tion Map m rr 07-1..A,110. PM • .'ln4 ~ SC)UJtCU: l su.s iS U1&lld. l.tl,-c~ lll.Af'll l'lll), S~l l nt n..:n: l'Jt l), U)S AN!ll.lJ'q 111) llA 2<991JO l '\\lllS!>II0IA\(IIS"C\ll111,.MPI- Pl'~U « • .M t11.,,M,I {':V,Z.1111} ~ ; ,.

•$, • .•-t. . ~~ ~· -§l' >,..,... i• lt,thl . ~ .. !, ....._ J

- •►'"._~:lll;~tt- ~ I l •

- l,110HNIJ MAP2 Sltc..:18ur t I o:::l] Plll,i

/,710 Corridor P,vj,cl " Pmjcc1 Lucmlon Mar 111 J 0? I.A ?10- l'f,H.9f.24.') li,l l19P!X> ~(,t!Rf'I 11.trl~ 7,;\'Quad, 111HC1111.M'fl llll 1, -StlU1 II tlA'I Ii ('i!H. l .O~-- ANOt'JJ_'\ (·--811 ( .li~ I 1301)1 ~'I'E I ,

J,EOEND ~ MAP 2 Shccl 9of 11 IC Prujct1 Llmh, 1'1\l••IWI llllclti\'I IVI lllt1\f'l' 1-7 /0 Corridor Projcc1 p, jcci Locnllon Map '\ 1I A ,110• PM ,I f//24.9 • IJA 2·199

" It ..J... I ',c \J >,' '. '&;. ..

Shc..:1 10 of 11

l'l(l;.01 1 IUhR,\1 IVh IJR /1171

1-7 JO Corridor l'roj,cr • Ull Project Locu1ion Map , mr 07-1..A,-710 PM 49111,9 SIMJHt'I..: USCiS 7.l'Q- ,nl. L0)1,( j UltAt"--·I I t II). snu-- rll tlAll!-- ( t i ) l .t>.!i A--~------"l'rll!I.J.!.li (lll) HA 2-19900 U,CBN I) Sl1L'tl l II of l l IC}) µruJur.:1 Luml~ PRI• UEI.IIJLlll\llVI IJRAFT 1-710 Cm·,·hlur Pmjea Projec1 l..ocmion Map nm 07,L,\ 710. J>M J.Q/24.9 SUl UCB_: llSGS '1,'i'011•1 I I ONO IJPM11('JIII SOl.l nlO,\'lll fll,11, l_,fk~A ,'-Cl,l l'-..,,;(•~I) I,,\ 2119900 I \l!M~'l>;Ol,\\CJl~ul1umM.Jlll.l'i°flf U.lC_~l;1p.■1~1/ I I I ., Ii ..._ .J- - '- • t-1 •;; ~ "' ~ "' i -i)'- ~

i~ : "i t

It I It'..:. ~o

::,...,.j ~ -~•

1) f 'U I • ,, . ! t••t ,ii\~ .il '· t\•U·,;i, t\J. Lll013Nn MAP:l ,l:ll\~ 1 2 or1 4 D Arei orP ohmtiul urr~u. 13).1)\lllllf e alloms ROW Ahern"1lvc 1,Ncll!/(,C - l'roro~~dC" lll'llnN lW PRr l)FI lllFllATIVr; l}Ri\n d ~f'.\!TICl(IC~ -- 11inipur•1)'C'u 11mucllun 1-710 C,imitlur l'n>jft'I ~ Piup0.5L'\l Bttt1~,11t11.n tJ Ei1,onlofll 1Uru Coiridor Are:i of - lllovrlltd S1ruc i rutl.!IJI~ )J!I .., Po1~mlol FJffcc~~M np 11,.1 l'rt'WNJd Hi!llnnlng Wall&\ K.:&ourcesU vnlun.11.1d " r-- -- OHA 710 l' M 4.Q/24,Q SOURt'UlO !M 11'»)).'I B•IIIOOll 1'01onll11l Sound Uurrlcr11 cm::J(I • 14'1 , 1!! ~•I 118) ill\ 24\l'J0U

I \URii(~(ll,\\fil'\lt'l,II0111!\Af'U.J•lllp ,C1,i111J,11,m ~,J I HWl:Vl j) I I

-u ~ • Cl ~:;; ~ < .,.C:" "'~2 ~ C ~i s "~ -;: c:: ~ <6- ' ~ 0 - .,"' □ I I "'i,/""· <~ ~ ~ ,.; s i ! ., "'~ "' .. ~ ~ 0 ~ I., ~ ..~ "' .. :,: :., "' ~ -~ .--©- " 51 1::: - ... • ,. t- f •

3,, l.,J ~ ;; i p ~ ' ~ J: ·cc ~ -~ ~ Q EE ~ C ~ -== ~ Cz < o~cd lfo1til11i11»W tllh, . l{cPmurcet:8 vah1111L-d iTTff 07-l.A-7111-PM 4,0/l4,0 r.>--<> l'ut, r,11111So11m l ll iu•ri,ir, lli)J (1•1<19, l&S, 188) !'IIJ l)HGU: illNG t~l.11',i,>;'rl lM 12(11.ili) _,_ F.A 2490

1, ui.sOMU1,.'llliS\i',~·111ul'Al"l~~1.11•..(~ n tt,,. !'l'i•I t Ill/I 'Z/1I ! r:" J,; •,11 r,Ui' I 'i 1• 1 , I ,.1H111"J I 1 I J '

l,IJGrJND M,'\1' 3 Sheol9 ur2• D /\rc11o f ~01,n11t,1 Bffocb l1xl>1l1111C"n hrnnsIIOW 1 Allvn11111,. MIM!J(>(' - l'rnpllliod Cnllrnns lttltlOS ) _.. Potential Sn41nrllla rrlcn, [I'[J (i-i4'J, IK~- IKII) HA 249000

I \UftS080IAinlS'.C11llu1•1\Al11.M1111~(.\1,rldnnt,d ! IWIUI I 1 0 1 ~

DI

------. ' ~ - .-- .... ~ F li "'~--~ , * 0 1 ~ ;1 ::..

DI ~ ; - :a,_,_____ -,--- - _-:.;;;;!~ '

• ....,_ r if C I I

D I

:r - .....- . ..,.r" ~­ ! . ,~ . . ~ < .. ~

,

- ~ ; Y~n -l

--.,._,.,r..,. - "<.?' ~ ~ -- ~ ...:

II

1..t?,1. t\ii\. • • ....,;. I....._ - • }., .I ~ -1.A

Sht\•I 20 uF24 D /\re,, of Po10111i11l llrfrtL< f!xl<1lng Collr~n, 1\0W Alwrnnllvo IJA/(iH/M' - l'ropr.icd C'nilmn, KClW l'lRi\fT -- (ie1111io1rlc~ 'rc1n1M.ll'III')' C'OllMIUl'1k111 1-7/{) Cr-Jrrltl,1r f'1YJ},·1 Propusedo, •idgc, t111J r Bm,cnu:,m $ Corridor Arnn of ,., - 81ovmcd S1rucu1ru~ Pnrl'l.'ll!i II . Po1umlnl F.ffec1~ Map ""' • l'r11po,od Rclninin~ Wall, l!Q'l1llrcc~ f!vplu"10il I UI I (J'/,L.,\,711). l't>l 4.Wl4,I) eu, ;JtlO•i: II £• 14U, K~ Kd) ....:::-,t i;1,u11 '"'" 'l' MilOl '•l Po1emlnl Sou~d HMrlcr• [m:J